Full text of "Jambalaya [yearbook] 1971"

Digitized by the Internet Archive

in 2010 with funding from

Lyrasis IVIembers and Sloan Foundation

http://www.archive.org/details/jambalayayearboo76edit

AMBALAVTV

NIVERSITY

LOUISIANA

OOK 1

^1A

L^vil

The automobile license plates label the state as the
"sportsman's paradise," but common sense and or
a few months' observation would lead one to think
of Louisiana as a paradise for the sociologist or the
photographer. By living in New Orleans for any length
of time, one can easily detect the contrasts along the
major arteriel streets, absorb the facial expressions,
the structural facades, both wooden and crystaline,
that frame those same faces, and realize that the stra-
tification in the parish is nearly complete.

But where does that put Tulane University and its
students? Perhaps we too are part of the New Orleans
syndrone. On a day to day basis, it is fairly easy to
overlook the problems of this area by staying near the
uptown campus during the day, or by selecting Clai-
borne or St. Charles over Freret when using public
or private transportation to travel to the Vieux Carre
or the central business district. In our own way, we
have created our own form of paradise, our own little

J"' •-<f ***- " *•*

Utopia on our precious tract of land in the "university
section." What better place is there to forget about
national or global problems, or the slum conditions
that are just a few blocks away on Freret Street?

In our own sphere of influence, that is, in New Or-
leans, and at Tulane, each of us have to make a choice.
As individuals, or in groups, we can be content to
educate ourselves, or we can try to educate and in-
teract with the community and the University for the

betterment of both parties. Relaxing on the U.C. squad
may have its benefits, but there are better things to

be done.

As for the "sportsman's paradise," and the Utopian
life style— try Biloxi.

Matt Anderson

Editor.

Jambalaya 1971

\i\

^ J5 • < ^

■P'^; ft

Hi-, '^'-'

\ :

t*''^"'

B.^*^:::'

rv ;

^'i*---.^-

iC*^^

• .-.• ¥-.^-??aiSiS>a'Ss.

m m-^

r*f^

fi^**'.

iii^^ ^ .

^^..^

;rl

15^ -

S55 ;8'

ll«

iis -•;'>^'

v^ 5,

«, ^*

,:.- .Vi

8 / SOW THE SEED

10 / BUCKPASSING 101

14 /A COUPLING

16 / MAGAZINE STREET

24 / THE TALE OF NINE RATS

38 / A CRISIS'

40 / THE BIRTH OF A MUSHROOM

44 / FOR THE LOVE OF SCIENCE

48 / AN EDITORIAL

50 / WHO SHALL GOVERN, WHO SHALL RULE

56 / JAZZ: DISCOVERY AND DIFFUSION

64 / DORMS

72 / THE COLONEL

76 / C.A.C.T.U.S.

82 / STOPPING TO THINK ABOUT IT . . . AGAIN

88 / LOOKING BACK: J.Y.A.

94 / LAW AND THE PUBLIC

98 / ARCHITECTURE: EVOLUTION BEYOND ALL PRECEDENT
102 / FREE UNIVERSITY
104 / A SNACK BAR
106 / RUSH

110 / FRATERNITIES: HOW LONG WILL THEY BE ABLE TO STAY?
114 /IT'S ALL RIGHT
118 / FROM THE VILLAGE TO THE DALE
122 / THE TULANE ATHLETE. CIRCA 1971
126 / RELIGION AD HOC
128 / ODE TO A NEWCOMB GIRL
130 / THE NEWCOMB IMAGE

136 / HOMECOMING COURT 1971 BEAUTY AND THE BEAST
140 / SUNDAY AFTERNOON
148 / "POETS AND THEIR WORDS"
152 / OCTOBER 24
158 / DICK GREGORY
162 / THE U.C. BOARD
166 / MEDIA

180 / THE HOLLYWOOD FORMULA
182 / MONTACHINO AND SmiMER LYRIC
186 / CAMPUS NITE SEVENTi'-ONE
188 / KUYPERS AT 70
190 / A CAPPELLA CHOIR A C4PPELLA
192 / TULANE UNIVERSITV THEATRE
196 / OH WHAT A LO> ELY WAR!
200 / R.O.T.C.
204 / MESSAGE FROM SEOUL

PAGE 8 /

sow the seed

The growth of the consciousness within the university is like a tree. Tulane

has matured a great deal in the last tew years. Some of this growth has
been painful. Students and faculty felt the chill of a new season, and were
blown from the branches of the University. Some felt that the school had
lost its sap. and others viewed the tree as bare. A few leaves fell to the earth
to produce fodder for the winter season and to replenish the tree.

Underground, the students and the faculty organically broke down to feed

the tree, while other forces from without felt the best way to improve the
University would be to bulldoze it into shape. The science complex sprung
up after a tree had been bulldozed, so that ideas could blossom from the
building. That tree had flourished on campus due to the special soil and
climatic environment, and because a doctor had taken care to plant a
special seed. This seed was one of two that had been sent by a colleague
with the hope that the species, which was near extinction, would survive.
Only six seeds were known to exist, and two were sent to Tulane. One of the
seeds grew next to the old history department, but both gave way to a
scientific computer card.

That tree was one of the casualties on the great wheel of life. But its brother
grows tall between Richardson Memorial and Dinwiddle Hall. And in that
tree, about three quarters of the way up. one could see on the vernal
equinox, nestled among the branches, a basket of twigs.

And so it is in the arms of the University that we build our consciousness in
which we will nestle our off-spring until they are strong enough to fly away

on their own.

— r. Collins vallee
march 1971

/ PAGE 9

buck
passing

torn
Ireland

Whenever there is a spark of originality

Whenever there is a gleam of hope,

As long as there is life,

Wherever there is the spirit of living,

In whatever possible form,

It must be crushed by committees.

— Paul Schulman (A & S '69)

This University is dedicated to the proposition that all problems can be
"dealt with" by committee. Besides increasing the frustration of
people who try to do things on this campus, this type of committee
system has two other important drawbacks. An idea is frequently aged
and distorted beyond usefulness or recognition through the committee
process. A good idea, even if it were to come out of the committee
intact, is generally so old that it no longer carries the piquancy and
relevancy it once had.

Also, an idea, once approved by a committee, becomes an
institution — it can only be changed or modified by repeating the same
process of committee consideration. Minor repairs require just as
much effort as a total overhaul.

By mid-fall of 1969, there seemed to be no solution to the problem.
Then, during the T.L.F. uprising of the following spring, it became
painfully apparent to everyone that something had to be done to speed
up the decision-making process.

PAGE 10 /

N r^jx^<? '^ H

/ PAGE 11

PAGE 12 /

The University's Academic Council suggested

a conference of all segments of the University

Community to try to answer some of the critical

questions the University faced; and somehow,

the 1970 Summer Conference got off the

ground. For three days, students, faculty,

administrators, alumni, and others sat opposite

each other and "talked" (or shouted, or argued,

or accused, or denied).

The members of the Board of Administrators

claimed that they were only businessmen and,

consequently, amateurs at handling academic

affairs. They specialized in handling the

University's money and had hired the president

and all the other administrators to handle

academic affairs, they said. The administrators

feigned shock at the paralyzingly slow process

of change in the University and said they only

wanted to handle matters affecting the financial

situation of the University.

An idea began to take root: lower-level
administrators could make decisions and act on
them without having to endure the stifling
committee process. Students, faculty, and
administrators began changing the decision-
making process of the University so that the
buck would stop with them. New constitutions
and by-laws flourished. Changes began to
occur in less than a year, less than a semester,
sometimes even less than a month.
Administrators were beginning to have a
function besides trying to placate and further
delay students already infuriated by frustration.

And now that administrators could actually

DO things, another new idea began to take

shape: it actually does some good to talk to

people; something might actually get done even

if no demonstrations take place. Students,

faculty, and administrators began to talk to

each other and things started getting done.

An outgrowth of the same ideas that created

the Summer Conference also created the

weekly University Forums. Originally, the

Forums were designed to increase the amount

of contact between the president and the

student body. However, during the early

Forums, the president almost invariably

referred questions to one of the "lower-level"

administrators in the audience in whose special

province the question fell. The students soon

caught on. By second semester this year, the

Forums consisted largely of students grilling all

of the administrators, alerting each of them to

problems in his specific area.

Action-producing conversations are now

taking place on a "lower-level" and things are

getting done. The result? For the first time in

many years at Tulane, a president of the student

body has said that there is good communication

between the students and the administration.

/ PAGE 13

L*^.:i.2«

PAGE 16 ti

\'-.-;\--'

- V-' V

"^^

■'.'.'■>;

'&.

■ ■'< y

' ' ■ " 'i''

^ *'

j^'

".' -':■<'

^"^^ i.ti

•4"

■■,i

j> ;

''■'V''i

• -' .••:

.',;--

-^,-,

r.-va

^Hj

'^.y^j

0(J11/T

nf iQu

PAGE 18 /

Old, blind, and lonely for those summers whose

slack now gathers as wrinkles in their skin, their

apathetic fingers throb numb with the idleness of

sixty false winters. The soft deadness in their eyes is

sometimes mistaken for that darkness which falls as

a shadow from the prophet's brow and they are

called Immortal.

But the dust of grave's first layer, the mark of

earth's own, clings snowlike to their old-rolled

trousers and time-whitened heads, and waits like

Fate upon their breasts making each breath more

like those drawn through the lips of the dead.

The children roll like quarters down the nickel-
coloured sidewalks. But here value lives not m
simile, but in the novelty of the old wood and iron-
stoppered bottles which the Immortals sell to buy
false teeth and coffin nails.

— Farrell Hockemeier

/ PAGE 19

PAGE 22 /

Dirty old storefronts.

So peacefully quiet inside.

A welcome rest

From the continuous traffic

and screaming children.

Dusty bottles and rotting furniture
Echo the age of the street.
Storekeepers' faces express
Their most frequent complaint:

"Business is slow."

It all seems so useless.

The irony, of course. Magazine Street

Is essential to New Orleans.

— Tom Lee

/ PACE 23

the rat of
the tale of

tales

PAGE 24 /

v*,*^

tales by
jim dalfares

illustrations by
rusty Josephs

In recent years. Tulane has been most adept at at-
tracting certain students who seenned to have formed
definite campus cliques. It is not our desire here to in-
form the world of the characters Tulane seems to be
currently plagued with: on the other hand, they cannot
simply be ignored. We imagine that the preemment
success Tulane has had in this regard is a simple case
of "build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a
path to your door."

And you might catch a few mice while you're at it. For
despite rumors about "rats deserting a sinking ship." it
is known that several species of rats are currently still
attending the University. No immediate cause for alarm.
but we think we should perhaps pause now and reflect
on who plagued the universities of Europe in 1349 with
their mysterious "black death". (Sounds like the title of
a Flash Gordon thriller, doesn't it?)

It is now. of course, de rigueur to attack such a clas-
sification of campus types. After all. isn't everyone now
doing his own thing, and doesn't "doing your own
thing " preclude doing it like everyone else? We think
not. though we admit we might well be forced to defend
our essay with all the fierceness and tenancity of a cor-
nered rat.

The world-renowned scholar Arthur Koestler. in his
book The Ghost in the Machine, attacks what he calls
the philosophy of "ratomorphism' . In previous times.
man committed the error of anthropomorphism — or at-
tributing to animals and objects human qualities. With
the present emphasis of psychology and behavioralism
however. Koestler feels that the opposite fallacy is
coming to the foreground — ratomorphism. or at-
tributing to humans only animal characteristics. Thus.
Koestler deplores the fact that Pavlov counted the
drops salivating from a dog's mouth, and from this, dis-
tilled a philosophy of mankind.

Certainly we would deny a desire to support a belief in
such a Kafkaesque metamorphosis. In a true sense
however, all Tulane students are caged rats in an ex-
periment, and it is not by any means unpredictable that
so many will turn out to be neurotic, to have behavior
pattern fixations. They have perhaps been constantly
conditioned to act so. having no more real freedom
than a citizen in 1984. And Winston Smith in that novel
perhaps realized, in his absolute horror of being placed
in a cage full of rats, that he was no more free than
they.

So. on we persevere in our attempt to depict several
easily recognized campus species, knowing all the
while how easily we might be proved guilty of not being
completely serious in our endeavor. At the same time,
we hope only that our voices are not as completely
quiet and meaningless "as wind in dry grass or rats'
feet over broken glass in our dry cellar' .

/ P.\GE 25

the dorm-ouse

When awake, usually between 6
p.m. and 6 a.m., the Dorm-ouse
feels safe within his womb, hiding
in his room, encased within his
tomb. College is to while away four
or five or six years learning how to
be a slob. Class is that rare ritual of
diversionary activity — finding
another place to rack out
occasionally. Registration is to
schedule your classes between one
and three in the afternoon, and to
see that you never have to walk up
a flight of stairs or cross Freret
Street. Luckily, Eddie's is just on
this side of your self-set territorial
limits.

In any case, you don't go outside at
all if the temperature is below 60°
or if it looks like rain. You just
remain inside your room — your
pride and joy, your warm mother,
your lover, your wife. Your new
lady friend lives in. She has ample
knobs and she's colored. Her name
is Zenith. When you're bored with
Zenith, you go and console your
friend General Electric, who really
likes to open up. The General is full
of the good things in life — like
food. Or 500 hits. And last, but not

least, is your bed, with whom you
share your most intimate moments.
She says you talk in your sleep but
only use four-letter words.
If you can manage to stay in bed all
day, you figure you've just about
broken even with life.

Life is also an all-night bridge
game.

You do emerge from your cocoon
to fly high every Friday and Sunday
night. No matter how bad, boring
or bloody it might be — come rain,
or sleet, or dark of night — you
cannot miss seeing a free flick. As
everyone knows, the show must go
on. At least until you light up.

You've been in the same room for
five years. Advisors come and
advisors go, but you live on.
Tacked to your door is a sign
stating, "I am Who Am." People
walk by silently and reverently. .
They respect you and occasionally
come to you for advice. Especially
at registration time. You know the
secret love life of every professor
on campus. You can get a
freshman's car registered, a library
fine erased. You know when the
next bust will be. The Greenie cops

call you by your first name, the
ladies at Bruff give you an extra
helping, and Herbie knows you well
enough to grimance as he walks
past you.

You are a lurker. If you are up
during the day, there is nothing
better to do than to go over to the
U.C. and lurk for five or six hours.
Your booth is the second from the
jukebox, unless you retire to one of
the tables to play bridge. You know
Fast Freddie and Manny down in
the pool hall; they reserve table
five for you.

Basically though, you are a child of
the night. You love dark corridors,
gloomy skies, hard blues. Your
favorite book is Dracula.
Other people on your corridor don't
know your real name. They refer to
you by silently shaking their heads.
You do have a nickname the whole
dorm knows though, pointing out
your peculiar idiosyncracies. It
might not be "Birdman" or "White
Rabbit" or "The Alien", but it is
recognizable enough.

10:30 p.m.: Pretzels and beer and
"It Takes A Thief."

PAGE 26 /

the frat rat

Like the other rats, you — the frat

rat — have your own distinctive

costume, which you believe is a

signal flag to members of the

opposite sex that you are the type

of man who reads ■Playboy" — i.e..

a real plastic swinger. From your

fashion-collared pocket-stayed

Gant shirts to your weejun boots.

you are in the height of style.

Those of you frats who are rich, but
don't want to be particularly
ostentatious or engage in
conspicuous consumption, own
only a regular Cutlass instead of a
442. Even so. it is equipped with a
vinyl roof, black vinyl interior, a
stereo tape deck with a four-
speaker system, and bucket
seats — with the middle hump
covered by a pillow so you and
your date can. thus neutralizing
one of the most effective means of
birth control today. To create your
own rhythm, you can also use your
variable-speed windshield wiper.

Booze and boobs used to be your

staple. On big outings, you were

always ready with a bottle in the

car as soon as your date got in.

When fixing a date for one of your

brothers, the greatest compliment

you can pay a girl is, "Like, man,

you'll really dig her: she can drink

me under the table." For you know

you have to pour drink after drink

down the almost-insatiable

Newcomb gullet before you can

hope for some ACTION.

In the liberated Tulane of today

though, grass has assumed all the

mystique of a fifth of Scotch or

Bourbon. Now when you pick up

your date, you often just ask. ■'Hey.

baby, ya' wanna turn on? ' In one

way or another though, you are still

looking for your Southern Comfort.

You sucker pledges into joining the

fraternity because they pay the

dues. They are greeted by the

Face — the rush chairman with the

$100,000 smile. Funny how all you

big brothers, who promised the

freshmen to get them dates and to

tutor them, now either ignore them

completely once they are pledged.

or go to them on a Friday before a

football game with a "Hey, Sam, I

PAGE 28 /

bet you know a lot of freshman

girls in your classes." Your

brothers are your real pals until

they get the paddle into their hand,

with a sadistic gleam to their

eye — then watch out! When drunk

though, you form your collective

womb, and hold hands, and sing.

and stomp through the beer sludge

while your dates look on.

Cute, isn't it?

Your greatest possible pleasure is

a football weekend. If you want to

be true to your name as a frat rat.

you must already be bombed at the

pre-game cocktail party. The

purpose of the football game itself

is to get your date excited, to yell

obscenities and to thereby parch

your throat. And after the game

there is the glorious dance, more

appropriately called the ball.

You have Playboy nudes on all four

walls and your bible is the Frosh

which comes out every year just in

time for you to call up prospects to

inquire. "Say, do you look as neat

as your picture? And would you

like a date with a real live Frat

Rat?"

minnie mouse

It is hard to characterize the
thoroughly modern Minnie. You are
rapidly changing your image from
that of the villager-clad, weejun-shod,
well-bred filly (sired by Who's Who
out of Social Register). In accord with
the changing trends of fashion, you,
the Newcomb co-ed are now sporting
faded blue jeans, tie dyed T-shirts
(sans bra), and an occasional maxi-
skirt: the midis never did quite make
it on campus. The coiffure has
remained basically unchanged: with
the exception of an occasional shag,
you still grow your mane long enough
to be able to shake it in the breeze.

Socially our young lady finds

herself in quite a quandry. The

frat man just isn't movmg swiftly

enough to keep pace with her

liberated attitudes. But that only

leaves the REAL FREAKS! And

everybody knows that in addition to

being dirty, and smelly, and addicted.

they are also victims of various

unmentionable sexual diseases. This

leaves you no alternative but to

demean yourself on Friday and

Saturday nights and to don your Dior

originals and make the scene at the

Top of the Mart (capitalism is really

disgusting isn't it?). But after all.

Mommy and Daddy didn't shell out

516,000 to have you graduate

ringless.

Another traumatic problem which
confronts the "new " Newcombite, is
the old sorority hang-up. Like it or not
girls, it is still part of the 'status-
quo' . Thus even the girl who is trying
desperately to become part of the
•Now" generation must subject
herself to pangs of Rush. Although
the emphasis is not quite as heavy
(girls no longer transfer to LSU for a
semester to pledge Chi Omega there,
and the suicide attempts when the
Kappa rejection list comes out are not
quite as prevalent), the bidding is still
very important.

The sexual revolution is not quite the
scene at Newcomb yet. Although it

has been rumored that there has not

been a virgin Newcomb grad since

before the days of Sophie herself,

Nancy cannot quite bring herself to

fornicate on the quad. Drugs? Well.

everybody is smoking now. I mean

even some of the straight people

engage m illicit marijuana activities.

But hard dope? Do you think I would

do that to My bod? They cant prove

that the pill is medically harmful you

know.

Alas everybody knows that the Real

world isn't very interested m what the

"Now" generation is doing to change

the Newcomb co-ed. After four years

as a fashionable freak you will

obviously have released all of your

hostilities and surrender. You will

take your place among the ranks of

other "educated ' housewives.

/ P.\GE 29

mighty mouse

Life is like a game of football.
And football develops mature,
responsible young men. That's why
you need bed check and study hall.

But all work and no play makes
Jock a dull boy. You have two main
recreational activities — machine
smashing and queer bashing.
Bystanders might be appalled at
first to see you singlehandedly
reduce a sparkling new candy
machine into a squeaking hulk of
junk before their very eyes. But to
watch a wild beast in anger is a
beautiful thing.

The philosophic undertones of your
actions are apparent moreover, to
anyone who has studied the
Luddite movement or the risings of
the German Handwerker in 1848.
You stand as the unsung hero of all
those unable to cope in the
increasingly technological,
complex world of today. You use

only your brute instincts for
survival, bringing back ancient,
fond memories of an earlier era.

For college has taught you that
"intellectual means ineffectual.
Isn't that what your whole
education has been about?

As for queer bashing, you define a
queer as anyone who has long hair
or who stands under six feet in
height and who (horrors) doesn't
care to work out with weights daily.
Or who (worst of all) perhaps even
likes classical music. It's enough to
make a decent American sick.

After all, there's nothing really
wrong with roughing up a few
"queers." So roll on. Green Wave.
Violence is as American as apple
pie.

It's not that football glorifies
violence or ir-rat-ional solutions to
your problems, whether you're
blitzing in on defense or tossing
the long bomb. It's not that football

PAGE 30 /

overemphasizes blind obedience to
your leader and fascistic
discipline. But what ever happened
to the old Statue of Liberty play?

Actually, the campus has a
disturbing'tendency to lump you
together with all the others who
live on the upper floors of Sharp,
whereas, you might not have all that
much in common with your
floormates. You might be in college
to study primarily and to play
sports only secondarily. You might
even be a weekend hippie.

But the campus does group all of
you together, for they come into
little contact with you, thinking that
there are two entirely separate
cultures living side by side,
speaking separate languages and
having little regard for each other.
Thus, your language is thought to
be marked by the extensive use of
monosyllablization and by the use
of a different system of morphemes
and phonemes than the rest of the
campus — in short, your speech is
blunted, stunt6k:l, grunted.

And the almost superhuman
initiation rites intiSlx3(SKeiom prevent
the plebeian student from ever
being admitted into your august ^
SQclety. And on youftpwtfyojj do " \
jpbt care to mingle with the scholar.

In facj^you strangely enough 4
engage in foraging raids into the
scholarly community only in
January and May, for reasons asufi
yet undetermined. Like uphill |
Indisin tribes who annually raid.fj^e
lowlands in search of salt however,
your raids are thought to be^;^^^'-^
caused by the need for sq.
commodity you are ordinaril
unable to naturally produce

Mens sane in corpore sano^
be an excellent classical
educational dictum, but the student
sometimes feels it becomes
ludicrous if the administration
promotes a sound mind in an
entirely separate and distinct
group frorh those whose sound
body it glorifies and immortaliz
in the annals of sports history.
Somehow, the student gets the
feeling that, given a time door to
ancient Greece, the University
would not even try to retrieve Plato
or Aristotle or Pericles but rather
turn its sole attention to the 300
Spartans who held back the
\mmortals of Xerxes at Thermopoli;

Imagine them with shoulder pads
on, clad in the old olive and blue!

the pack rat

You denizens of the Quad, you

Frisbee freaks, dance to the beat of

a different drum. You wear

designer clothes — army surplus

originals, with sandals and beads.

It's your uniform.

You also grow your hair long and

frizzy because hair is all protein,

life's essence, and the more hair

you have, the greater your life

essence. Frizzy hair also acts as

receptor antennae for the dark

interplanetary forces, cosmic rays,

emanating from heavenly bodies in

the zodiac belt and giving you

power.

You say you need neither food nor

water to survive, only the scent of

wildflowers.

It's not that you believe in

astrology, but it never does one

harm to consult one's daily

horoscope, does it? You were born

on the cusp of the third house. You

no longer toss a coin when you

take multiple-choice tests;

consulting your ouiji board is. after

all. much more scientific.

Hard-core freaks live in the

Quarter or in their Volkswagen

vans (very high status). And then

there's Cherokee Street, the zoo

and Creighton House. You do not

live on twelfth floor Monroe. You do

find splendour in the grass

(Shakespeare's words, not ours) at

the Festival of Life, every Sunday in

the park. You move frequently, and

your forwarding address reads

simply "parts unknown." The same

could be said of your hair.

You sit on the U.C. steps, eight-by-
two abreast.

"What we have here is a failure to

communicate. " So the warden tells

Cool-Hand Luke. Your own

conversation at times fails to get its

message across to those over

thirty, who — you complain — never

can talk to us. Like, man, ya know

what I mean? Real heavy,

otherwise a bummer. All you can

talk about is how high you got last

night, which shows your superiority

over the frat man whom you

degrade. They only can talk about

how bombed they got last night.

You can also rap about what a

lousy, stinking, rotten place the

U.S. is. constantly criticizing and

carping the straight society. Let he

who is stoned cast the first.

Anyway, you're soon migrating

(you fly very high). Crete is a great

place this time of year, almost as

good as Morocco, though not quite

as good as Nepal or Sikkim.

You are ingenious. Who would

have guessed that the best place to

hide your lid is in the elevator

shaft, between third and fourth

floor, or in the hung ceiling?

You drop out. College, after all. is
just subsidized by the military-in-
dustrial complex to turn out those
half-human products that they use
as tools to meet their needs. Who
needs it? That's why a lot of you go
only part-time and hang around

here. If you work really hard at it.

you can manage to do absolutely

nothing all day long, except maybe

listen to the great vibes from your

set. And then there's the

Warehouse on the weekend.

If you are going full-time, you are a

drama or psychology major. The

real weirdos go m for philosophy.

You are definitely, definitely not a

freak if you read the Jamb. After

all. Marshall McCluhan says you

have turned away from the Western

tradition of a visual culture to

audio-tactile one. And you know

that's true.

Marshall McLuhan said it.

PAGE 32 /

the king rat

Suave and slick, you are on an ego
trip of your very own as a student
politician. Neatly groomed, you
wear wing tips and flair trousers
(you wouldn't be caught dead in
anything as wild as bell bottoms).
You stand in the front at senate
meetings while delivering your
prepared impromptu speech

worrying whether or not your fly is
open.

You are a schemer — an insipid,
immature, colorless manipulator, a
weasel, a worm. Student politics
for you is only a stepping stone to
greater deeds. "Today student
senator, tomorrow . . . ?"

Student government could be an
effective way of getting things done
around here, but you must
formalize and impersonalize it to
such an extent that it stagnates
under the weight of your created
inertia. You transfer all the errors
of national government — unwieldy
in its stifling mass of
bureaucracy — to student
government, which should be much
more effective in transferring
desires into practice because of its
size.

Under the facade of legal
procedure, you thwart such goals
and see to it that only your plans
are enacted. On your nightstand,
Robert's Rules of Order is your
daily inspiration. You read it 15
minutes a day, before retiring. You
want to be a Big L.

You either cop out to the
administration daily or you "go to
the people" and tell them that you
are going to be a different kind of
representative by getting everyone
involved in improving the campus
academia and campus
atmosphere. "I'm not talking about
having 30 or 40 really involved
people on campus; I'm talking
about having two or three thousand
people up in arms over what is
happening to Tulane." In any case,
plastic radical or not, your fourth
year you cut your hair short for
your job interview with Scott Paper
Co.

You have a firm, dry handclasp and
nothing up your sleeve; you use
Chapstick (because you talk so
much) and Lysol Breath Spray and
Glorets gum and the all-new Hot
Comb.

Some people respect you because
they think you know how to pull
strings to accomplish your goals.
More often than not, though, you
are yourself a puppet on a string.
You do have contacts, though; they
look so much better than glasses.

You also have the gift of gab. Too
bad Pandora let it out of the box to
plague mankind so.

lere is
more satisf

jWT^., 30.-^0

glcks^_ Mouse,'" the

you, "but wait until you get into the

R^ALARMY." :'— > _ - ■

/hat he doesn't tell, you -feth'

rople who have been" in the ser-

,vice, whether army or navy or air

|fDrce. for 20 years have yet to scale

v&'Dove the MicKe^j^ous|^hat is

peitinent h^fc^TowevPr is to

discuss where you can find the

REAL ROTC.

It is hard to find you right now,
for it is no longer acceptable to be
in ROTC on campuses throughout
the country. Rumor has it, though,
that you are alive and well and liv-
ing in the barracks. You slink over
to the Stadium to drill on Tuesdays,
11 a.m. All this reeks of a clandes-
tine operation, which is a shame
really. For as long as the armed
services must exist, the officers
might as well come from liberal
enlightened campuses as from
isolated military enclaves of
"higher education." The hassle
students give you is just to remind
you that not everyone agrees with
the military propaganda you have
to daily imbibe, to make you aware
that not everyone blankly accepts
and supports all of the military's
policies.

But you do go to drill and march
around like mmdiess automotons
or carefully crafted androids. The

later has to give you courses

|litary Iq^dt^rship and initiative

in revive any lifelike

fhe warm bodies it has

fostered.

mow nothing. You only

follow orders. You do not question.
This is the connection ROTC has
/ith an inquisitive liberal e(i,uca-/,
tion. Too bad, even so, your trai
thought doesn't run on time.

If you are an underclassman in
ROTC, you are a real fanatic. "I'-Q^
going to go airborne armor," you
say, "because on your dress uni-
forms, you get to wear not only a
long, sharp, shiny sword, but also
silver spurs on your low quarter
dress shoes."

You buy cold beer at Eddie's,
and then put it into your footlocker
for three hours to let it warm up
because "that's the way they drink
it in Nam." Some of the more hip of
you might even smoke pot, unbe-
knownst to your ROTC leaders, but
even then, it's only because you're
in combat training for Nam and
want to experience battlefield con-
ditions.

If you go to airborne school you
don't even have to make five jumps
to get your wings. You just have to
complete four. If you don't make it
down in one piece the fifth time,
the army will mail your wings (reg-
ular postage) home to mother.

If you are an upperclassman, you
might not be quite so fanatic
because you have been caught
signing your life away before the

The lptter^3{^ects all of you
tremendously. Some really gung-ho
idQvil dogs drop out of ROTC once
they learn their number is too high

r them ever to be ^p^ to se,
,nd some of you a^^^n r'
lecause your numbe/'s up. a(
'ou gotta go, go as an officer
it's a good exercN

pocricy. And off in the di§?ance
you hear the s^ken sTrar»ds of
Uncle Sam singing "r,v§j^^Your
Number. " You certairTiynope he
has some for you: it's pleasant to
have at least some amenities that
far from civilization.

And after all, where would this
country be without the military-in-
dustrial complex? So kill for a
better America.

Some of you don't really have
blood lust though: that's why you
backed President Nixon when he
sent forces into Cambodia and
Laos to show the Hanoi govern-
ment our great desire for world
peace.

And then some of you are only in
ROTC to learn a good trade. One
might even qualify to get a com-
mercial pilot's license, or a river
pilot's one. After all, what can one
do with just a B.A. but drive an ice
cream truck? At least in the armed
forces, you can learn something
that will be beneficial to you once
you get out — if you get out. Like
maybe: you could become a mer-
cenary.

the yat b-rat

If you can remember when Eddies
was called Kollege Korner, and the
Hob Nob was Casamento's, you
qualify as a neighborhood b-rat.
You learned how to walk and skate on
the oak-tree lined tennis courts where
Butler House now is. You rapidly
grew up to become the terror of the
campus, the Creature from Audubon
Park Lagoon, racing around on your
Vroom bicycle, tripping up college
students, acting generally obnoxious.

After school every day, you used to
rush straight over to Kollege Korner
(remember?), drop your first quarter
into the machines, and light your first
Marlboro simultaneously. You
practiced in front of a mirror for
fifteen minutes a day to make sure
you let your ciggie droop at precisely
the correct angle. Kookie on "77
Sunset Strip" was your idol.

Then you'd go over to Newcomb quad
to play football, knowing that the
passing Newcomb girls (whom you'd
like to make a pass at — "Where y'at,
dawlin' ") were secretly eyeing your
bronzed bod as you cocked your arm
back for a pass, letting them furtively
glimpse at the newly-grown tuft of
underarm hair that proved you were
now ALL MAN.

Upon puberty, you, the neighborhood
b-rat, can qualify as a Yat. As a young
adult Yat, you are fairly easy to spot
with the naked eye. Generally
speaking, the male Yat is usually
attired in faded blue jeans, the waist
of which is placed between twelve
and fifteen inches from the neck.
Furthermore, a male Yat-in-heat is
often seen carrying a pink or blue
hair bruah which protrudes from the
back pocket of his jeans. Generally,
the male Yat will wear (along with his
jeans) a chic Ban-Lon shirt with an
alligator stitched on. Often though,
male Yats can fool even the
experienced Yat-watcher, for they
may on rare occasions, be dressed in
coat and tie. If by chance, the sight of
eight feet of axle-greased, combed-
straight-back hair doesn't give one an
inkling that this may be a Yat, he may
look for the minor trademark: white
socks, usually worn with dark suits.

The female Yat, though somewhat
less colorful, is fairly easy to detect.
One definite giveaway is fourteen feet
of teased hair in combination with six
falls (pronounce "Fawls"). But if she
is not chewing gum (Juicy Fruit) or
teasing her hair even more, she may
not be a Yat at all, but rather just a
Loyola student.

Once you are accepted at Tulane, you
try to deny your heritage by
condemning everything you have
NEVER been ashamed of. Your 1957
metallic blue Chevrolet with mag
rims, dual exhausts, Mardi Gras
beads hanging from the rear-view
mirror, defunct St. Christopher on the
dashboard, and "Hell no, we ain't
forgettin' " licence plates must give
way to a Corvette or a Cougar at the
least. Now the real transition; all your
clothes must be altered. Your mother
has to buy "Gant" labels for all your
shirts, including the alligator Ban-
Lons. Not only do you have to get rid
of your white socks, you have to get
rid of socks altogether.

Next comes the complete personality
take-over: you have to find a place on
your head to put a part. The brush
goes, and eventually the "security
comb" you carried your first few
months as a freshman. And then (the
most unkind cut of all) you will be
forced, by ridicule, to renounce your
favorite chant, "Where y'at, ya
motha?" "Where y'at?" is reserved
for upper-class Westchester County
residents who alone can make fun of
this saying. Worst of all, you have to
sneak in to .the Saints games so none
of your new friends will see you.

PAGE 34 /

and the mole

"I study, therefore I am."
As a mole, you are very accustomed
to night life. Not on Bourbon Sreet or
in Eddie's or in any of the other
symbols of the pseudo-decadence of
New Orleans, but rather, locked up in
your room, pouring over the delights
of your medical or law tracts.

Hauntmg, enchanting the little
bald mole

Are dim-lit halls, musty stalls.
Sacred spell of book-smell.

Undergraduates, or apprentice moles,
can learn the basic techniques of
your rare art easily — an utter disdain
for fellow students (groundlings), a
blank stare on your sleepless face as
you gaze out at the world through
your myopic haze, an almost
complete inability to communicate
with others. Who wants to talk about
tort cases in loss of consortium or of
the crisis of the aristocracy in 17th
century England all the time?

Your ability to criticize all aspects of
the University are simply amazing.
You criticize, but never participate in
anything going on at Tulane. If you
are a med student, you might go to
football games: otherwise, you may
as well be in Timbuktu. You live in a
different world; more appropriately,
cloud nine. You are already studying
intently to become an absent-minded
professor.

What is really amazing about your
dislike of the plebian student is that
going to Tulane might be a step up
for him and only a resting place
before going on to a better graduate
school, while your very being at
Tulane in most of the graduate
departments and professional
schools usually means that you have
been a failure elsewhere.

You did go out on a date once — you
remember, don't you? You brought
her home right after the opera and
rushed back to your room because
you knew you could still get in
another four or five hours of serious
booking before turning in.

You inhabit the library: some people
think you just crawl out of the

woodwork. You are not one of the

regular second or third floor
socialites, who go there only to make
dates for Friday night or xerox
someone's notes in the
photoduplication room or flit around
generally or go to the water fountain
or the bathroom every fifteen minutes
to spec out the new chicks who are
also wandering around looking for a
date for Friday night. Instead, you
thrive in the carrells, in the rear
typing stalls, on the fourth floor.

You are not completely straight. You
take speed — not to fly high, but to
cram better.

A hallmate once remarked of you,
"This is the stuff professors are made

of. " Strangely enough, you took it as

a compliment.

You would not degrade yourself by
studying anything useful: if you are an
expert in Chinese Ming dynasty vase
distribution in the East African
highlands, society should find a niche
for you to fit in. After all. it is the duty
of the scholar to research and to
write: it is the duty of the society to
accept those revelations the scholar
deems fit to make. Unfortunately, this
policy of yours has somewhat
backfired. Last week, you placed an
ad in the Times-Picayune:

"For sale: One Philosopher. Cheap.
Can Carp and can speak with pebbles
in mouth. 865-771 1 , ext. 420."

^'^♦'

•N

, S

v;. \

QO^

^:-i^

\< ^

emsis

As Tulane University entered the 1970's, the
outlook for its future seemed, in many ways,
bleak. Tulane was not unique in having
problems, of course. "The crisis of the
private university" had already become a
cliche during the late 1960's, as even the
wealthiest schools began finding red ink
on their ledgers. Costs for faculty salaries,
staff wages, building construction, library
purchases, student housing, etc., had
increased much faster than the ever-rising
tuition payments could match. The Vietnam
war limited the amounts of Federal aid

available after 1965, and the recession of
1970 caused a further tightening of both
Federal and private contributions. Tulane's
endowment was much smaller than those of
other leading Southern universities.

In addition, of course, the student disruptions
at countless schools, beginning about 1965,
caused many more problems for all American
higher education — physical destruction,
hostility between students, and faculty, and
administrators, polarization of opinions, and
over-politicalization of education. At Tulane
the amount of actual destruction and
disruption was small; and in this respect the
school was more fortunate than many richer
and more famous institutions. But even here,
the antagonisms created between various
parts of the University community (especially
over the case of mathematics Associate
Professor Edward Dubinsky, fired in 1969 for
his part in several campus disturbances)
were often deep and divisive. (Moreover,
alumni unhappiness over campus unrest, and
over the entire youthful "counter-culture,"
was unlikely to increase their willingness to
make the large contributions Tulane badly
needed.)

The effects of the financial squeeze at Tulane
were evident — cutting back on the number of
graduate degree programs, limiting the
number of new instructors and professors,
restricting the purchase of new equipment.
Yet the nature of the crisis at Tulane, on the
threshold of the 1970's, went deeper than just
the lack of money.

One aspect of the crisis could be seen In the
results of the 1969 survey of graduate
programs, sponsored by the American
Council on Education. Of 24 Tulane graduate
departments rated, none received either of
the top two (out of six) possible ratings, and
only four received the third highest rating,
"Good". Most of Tulane's departments were
graded only "Adequate" or "Marginal". In
short, despite the reputation this University
had long enjoyed as one of the foremost

PAGE 38 /

educational institutions in the South, the
quality of its educational offerings was just
not rated very highly by fellow professionals.
And there could be no denying that during
the 1960s, the quality of several important
departments had deteriorated noticeably.

A second aspect of the crisis could be seen
in the report of a special committee of the
American Association of University
Professors, sent to Tulane to investigate
whether standards of academic freedom had
been violated by the dismissal of Professor
Dubinsky.

On the basis of the report, issued in
December, 1970, it seemed unlikely that
Tulane would be censured for its actions, but
the committee was critical of the procedures
followed by President Longenecker and the
Board of Administrators in overriding faculty
recommendations in the matter. More
important perhaps, this outside committee
found that the case had "Produced
dissension and antagonism among different
groups within the faculty, and on the part of a
substantial portion of the faculty toward the
administration and the governing board." and
that this dissension had been "further
aggravated by decisions on other matters."
such as the graduate program reductions, the
intensified athletics program, etc.

"In our view," the investigating educators
said, "if this dissension continues, it can have
grave consequences for the effectiveness of
Tulane University as an institution of higher
education."

Its financial problems alone did not seem
likely to destroy Tulane, particularly if
increased Federal aid should be resumed in
the 1970's. Those problems could be faced
and overcome, if the whole University
community were to work together. But first
there had to be a community. The
disaffection among many faculty members.

both old and young: the consequent
departures of many outstanding teachers and
scholars: the inability to attract top-caliber
graduate students and administration: the
growing isolation of the President from the
rest of the University, both faculty and
students — these and other related problems
struck at the very life of the University. If not
corrected or ameliorated before long, they
indeed seemed able to plunge Tulane into a
possibly fatal crisis.

— Bruce Eggler

/ PACE 39

Seeds for the student owned and operated bookstore

were planted somewhere in the midst of the spring

events of the Tulane Liberation Front. More an

attitude than actuality, the Mushroom sprang up

impromtu in Student Senate Room B of the University

Center. Its main attraction was low priced used

books and records. Its purpose: to offer an

alternative to the University bookstore. Routine

returned after the dismissal of classes, but the

Mushroom did not fade away.

During the calm of the summer, the Mushroom was
permanently located in Zemurray Hall in a former
trunk storage room. Settled and recognized in
September as an authorized student activity, the
Mushroom, expanded and thrived. And
establishment did not sour the attitude.

Limited only by space and the restriction against
selling new textbooks, the student manager and staff
aim to serve the entire Tulane community. The
atmosphere is informal: music plays as the customer
browses for his books, records, film, threads,
paraphenalia. Nobody is pressured. People who drop
in to talk or to see what's new are as welcome as the
student who dashes in just before closing time.
Orders are placed for items which are not stocked.

Despite a hesitancy within certain elements of
Tulane to take advantage of the Mushroom's
potential, a profit was recorded by the end of first
semester. So, prices were further reduced and in
early spring, air conditioning was installed. Cool
attitude complemented by cool temperature — an
unbeatable combination.

Working through the Housing and Finance Office, the
student-run operation can rely on the backing and
the facilities of the University for assistance. The first
managerial change comes up this summer, but no
alteration of the store's character is anticipated. The
Mushroom is now one year young; that must make it
a perennial?

—Pat Parks
Newcomb '73

PAGE 42 /

/ pa«;e 4.3

[DII1II[

iov[ or

"It was a vertical slab . . . perfectly sharp-edged and symmetrical, it was so black It seemed

to have swallowed up the light falling upon it; there was no surface detail at all. It was

impossible to tell whether it was made of stone or metal or plastic — or some material

altogether unknown to man."

Thus Arthur Clarke described the monolith in his book, 2007.- A Space Odyssey. It was around

this crystalline slab that sub-human primates performed their first rituals which would for later

man, become the techniques for realizing the Universe. How could such a shapeless form

create within man the potential for exploring the Universe?

The question could very well be asked about the very monolith which has deposited itself with

tombstone precision across our campus. How can such a giant and featureless slab inspire

scientists engaged in creative research to seek greater understanding of such a varied

Universe?

Affectionately termed the new science center, this structure spans the length of the campus
along Freret Street and graces the entire academic Tulane campus with its imposing five

PAGE 44 /

stories. Effectively it slices the academic campus from the non-academic, not unlike a wall with
several gates. As one architect commented, "Its a nice place to walk through."

Historically speaking, the idea of improving science facilities at Tulane has been around since
World War II. Not until 1964 however, did serious planning begin. With prospective funds in
sight, two buildings which were to form a science complex were considered. What followed
seems to be little more than bad planning and bad luck. In the absence of a campus
development plan, a site was chosen, which proved to be aesthetically as well as structurally
unsound. One University official estimated about a year's delay as a result of the relocation.
Inflation and labor drain caused by Hurricane Betsy sent construction prices sky-rocketing.
The plan for two units was dropped, and the new site on Freret was selected.

The 1968 undergraduate bulletin showed the artist conception of the building, by then under
construction, with the completion date listed as 1969. The building was not to be completed
until two years later. Completion was set formally as March 1, 1971, but incomplete construc-
tion and delays in furniture and equipment installation caused problems which resulted in
delaying use of the building until the fall of 1971. By this time, a frightening financial situation
had caused the University to cut back a number of items including an auditorium, a green
house, an elevator, several environmental chambers, quite a few fume hoods, architectural
concrete for the ends and second floor of the exterior, and some of the intercom, clock, and
thermostat systems. Plans are still indefinite about the building of two more additional stories,

which the foundations were laid to support.

This varied and unfortunate history doubtlessly had a number of effects on the monumental
design of the building, inside and out. Physics department Chairman Robert Morris believes the
interior exhibits a distinct lack of design. Chemistry Professor William Alworth partially agrees.
Alworth says even though the faculty was originally consulted about the lab design, the
teachers were not consulted again after their plans had been revised. The chemistry
researcher blames this as the reason for much of the superfluous equipment and furniture
which complements a lack of other more essential items.

One of those mostly responsible for the faculty input that went into the design is a biology
professor, who today is considerably upset by the building. He is Dr. Frank Sogandares, who
will be leaving this year partially because of the new science complex. "It's an insult, " he
claims. "The move to the new building will be a move to mediocrity." Sogandares has been
here 12 years, and served as coordinator for science planning before construction. He believes
the building can only adequately accommodate two departments; but persistent deans, not
familiar with scientific laboratories, have tried to "give everybody a piece of the cake." The
well known biologist went on to say that the government may withdraw some of their support
because of the building's inadequate animal facilities and substandard cages.

Sogandares is understandably upset. If he were to move into the new building from his newly

renovated lab in Richardson Memorial, he would lose nearly two-thirds of his present
space — "a physical impossibility," he calls it.

One of the departments which was moved in at the last minute was Physics. The entire
department with the exception of Riverside facilities, a machine shop, lecture rooms, and a
Newcomb departmental office will move into the building. Dr. Morris explains the new facilities
are adequate; a great improvement over the present research facilities. The Physics

/ PAGE 45

department, with its departmental office, four undergraduate labs, and several advance
research areas will cost the Chemistry department six research labs and an office. Chemistry
will retain its freshman labs and lecture room in the chemistry building.

Psychology, the fourth of the science quartet, is rather happy to find a consolidated home for
its scattered department. Nevertheless, departmental Chairman Jack Buel intends to hold on to
other psychology space currently held by that department.

What then, considering these shortcomings, did Tulane get for its $6.8 million? Obviously since
$5 million of that is Federal money, and the government only buys research labs, Tulane got a
lot of lab, teaching, graduate, faculty, and research facilities. In fact, it is just a little astounding
that the first academic building on campus since the 1930's has no class rooms. Architecture
Professor Bill Turner explained what this means: Something less than desirable area is serving
as renovated classroom facilities for Tulane. "But makeshift classrooms are the penalty we
pay, until the government decides to start subsidizing them," he said.

Aside from the labs, little money is being spent on new equipment, according to several

teachers. "We will be sitting in nice new labs, but working with outdated equipment,"

complained one biologist. The Physics department gets no new equipment to speak of,

according to Dr. Morris, who claims an eye will tiave to be kept on the old equipment brought

in to make sure it's not outdated. Again, Sogandares comments, with limited janitorial service,

old furniture, equipment, and overcrowded conditions, the place will resemble a slum.

But where then, did the $6.8 million go? Another professor explained, "The designers told the

architecturally-minded persons that the money was going into providing good labs and

equipment, and they told the science professors that it was going to make an attractive

exterior." There are some who feel neither was accomplished. Professor Turner describes the

building as being "anonymous," having no great attraction, but also no great offense. "It's

rather neutral," he claims, and he adds, "the best thing about it is the hole." Referring to the

pedestrain plaza. Turner feels it is the only graceful thing about the structure. Graduate School

Dean and University Provost David Deener likes the design. "The building represents the

sciences." he once told a University forum. "It looks like a big computer card." Few would

disagree on the last point. The temptation to paint "IBM" on the corner of the building is great.

Despite its contemporary architecture, (or more likely, the lack of it), the building does have a

number of good features. Tulane Resident Architect Edmond Bendernagle likes the staggered

windows (including the ones assigned to the dark-rooms). The pastel interiors are nice, and

each floor has a different color to help one distinguish the rather non-descript halls from each

other. Turner likes the flexibilities which the design gives.

Unlike the specialized buildings which rapidly become outdated, the center is as useful as a

warehouse. Even Sogandares thinks the building is the most functional in Southeastern United

States. Chemist Dr. Dwight Payne finds the slate topped benches, the wooden cabinets, and

PAGE 46 /

the new offices very attractive. However, it is perhaps Dr. Morris who found the most attractive

aspect of the building: it offers an excellent opportunity for unity in the sciences; hopefully by

co-operation among departments with similar inter-disciplinary interests. "Besides." he

continued, "I've seen worse."

Despite the debate about the design, it is obvious that the space can be nothing but a most

welcome addition to an already overcrowded campus. It is unfortunate that a number of

territorial disputes will accompany this building. This however, is not uncommon for any

construction which fails to satisfy the needs of all the departments concerned. Perhaps the true

test of the building will be its ability to unify the quests of man, and stress this co-operation

over the imperfections of structure and space. Only when the structure of the "monolith" can

be ignored and more introspection given to human achievment. can mankind begin to realize

the Universe.

— Robert Thompson

A & S 73

Ji li

111

AN EDITORIAL

"A political resource is a means by which one person
can influence the behavior of other persons; political
resources therefore include money, information, food,
the threat of force, jobs, friendship, social standing,
the right to make laws, votes, and a great variety
of things."

— Robert A. Dahl, Modern
Political Analysis

The Tulane Board of Administrators is historically a self-perpetuating
body composed of men who have represented the same relative power
positions in the New Orleans business, civic, and social worlds since
Tulane 's inception in 1882. They have consistently possessed the
political resources necessary to influence the behavior of other
persons. Inter-acting with each other in numerous firms, organizations,
and activities, they have established interlocking relationships that
allow them to communicate, influence, work, and associate with each
other. Because of this inter-action, the channels for collective
political action have been established. However, despite the potential,
the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund do not act collec-
tively and cohesively as the Tulane Board on political issues. Since
these men possess the political resourecs to exercise individual power
through other outlets, the Tulane Board is but a collective political
power in dormancy.

— Taken from "Power in Dormancy:
A Study of the Tulane Board of
Administrators as a Political
Power," a research paper pre-
pared for the Department of
Political Science by Mark Davis
and Steven Felsenthal.

PAGE 48 /

A Board Chart*

METROPOLITAN AREA CO?.MITTEE

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

COUNCIL FOR A BETTER LOUISIANA

BOARD OF LIQUIDATION CITY DEBT

INTERNATIONAL HOUSE

UNITED FUND

OCHNER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL BOARD

AMERICAN RED CROSS

BUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH

SEWAGE AND WATER BOARD

METARIE PARK COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL

EDUCATIONAL T.V. FOUNDATION

INTERNATIONAL TRADE MART

BOSTON CLUB

NEW ORLEANS COUNTRY CLUB

TIMBERLANE COUNTRY CLUB

LAKEWOOD COUNTRY CLUB

LOUISIANA CLUB

PICKWICK CLUB

SOUTHERN YACHT CLUB

— 1

PLIMSOL CLUB

<
<

K
W
O

(-1
Q

•

a
w

K
<

Q
<
o

t-H

a:
o

Q
W

>-■

w
a:

•

>-^
K

►^

w
w

>-■

■3;

a
w

E-l

>^
a
a

Q
W

a
<

w
a

1— (

CO
W

o:
tn

E-l

HH
10
LO

C.I

l-i
w

EH
CO

Q
W

:x
u
w

E-l

* or — A Chart of the Board, or Who Belongs to What?

/ PAGE 49

^■^'(r^ ;•<

Kfftf-^.!

n-- ■♦■■

Who governs the university? Who

should govern the University? The
answer has yet to be established
after almost 1000 years of the Uni-
versity as an institution. In fact, the
state of university governance is
perhaps as much embroiled in con-
troversy now as it has ever been.
The controversy stems mainly from
the desire of students to have a
voice in the affairs of governance,
a voice commensurate with the
students' numbers, concern, and
involvement. Inevitably, sugges-
tions of such a radical departure
from tradition give rise to heated
feelings in the camps of all those
intimately involved and makes res-
olution of the question that much
more difficult.

Even as the controversy rages,
though, it should be pointed out
that the question of university
governance is not one of over-
riding concern to a great many
persons, including students. In-
deed, to the vast majority, the mere
problem of determining just who
makes the decisions now, is a dif-
ficult enough question. Trying to
understand the governance proce-
dures of the University can best be
described as an exercise in futility.
Opinions vary from one that says the
University is a hopeless bureau-
cracy that is totally unresponsive to
the needs of its members, to one
that says the University is an effec-
tive, although troubled, institution
that is attaining new heighths.
solving new problems, and re-
sponding to calls for reform.

The lack of interest on the part of
students in the method of operation
of the University stems primarily, I
believe, from the fact that students
have had so little involvement in
university governance that they are
not aware of the importance that
student involvement can have in
gaining not only student rights and
freedoms, but also a voice in other
university decisions that have been
previously determined without
benefit of student input.

Until very recently, students en-
tered college duly conditioned and
programmed to the fact that they
were to have little, if any, input into
the operation of the institution. The
job of governing and running the
University was in the hands of pro-
fessionals with elements of "de
facto" control vested in the faculty.
The student accepted such condi-
tions on face value and for years

blissfully ignored the entire state of
affairs. That day is past.

Students everywhere are beginning
to assert their right to be involved
in the decision-making process
within the university, and students
at Tulane are, again, no exception.
After years of leaving the task of
decision-making to others within
the university, American students
have realized that it is their own
education that is hanging in the
balance, and feel that it is time for
student voices to be heard in the
formulation of university policy.

With the initiation of the movement
for student participation in deci-
sion-making, the structure and
form of university governance
systems have come full circle. It
has taken 900 years for a fully
cooperating form of governance to
be proposed in universities. It is
small wonder that higher education
is constantly in crisis when one
views the history and the
development of university
governance. The first western
university was founded in Bologna,
Italy, during the final years of the
twelfth century. At the University of
Bologna, the student guild
controlled all aspects of institution
except the determination of those
persons eligible to teach. Beyond
this one prerogative held by the
teachers, students held an
all-encompassing power
that lasted for centuries, and
although the teachers began to
form guilds themselves, they were
powerless to overcome the student
guilds. By the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries, though, the
resentment of the teachers, public
pressure, and the availability of
funds from sources other than
students made it possible for the
power to be transferred from the
student to external governing
bodies such as the Church or the
city. In England at the same time,
another pattern was emerging.
There, power was transferred from
the civic and church officials who
had founded the educational
institutions to the faculties of these
institutions. Such a transfer of
power meant that the faculty was in
complete control of the institution,
including the control of student life.
Institutions founded in America,
though, followed the example of
the Scots and added another
source of power and control, a
governing body of laymen. The new
American institutions left control of

\A/HO

SHALL

GOVERN,

NA/HO
SHALL

RULE?

BY RALPH WAFER.

STUDENT SENATE PRESIDENT,

JUNE 1. 1970 to MAY 31, 1971

student life in the hands of the
faculty, but vested control of the
institution in a board of laymen.
Since that time, "de facto" power
of the faculty has increased to the
point where they effectively
controlled the forming of academic
policies. Concurrent was this rise
in power of the faculty, the state of
the student declined. Institutions of
higher education took on a
paternalistic air as the role of the
student became more like that of a
child, a ward of the institution. In
such a patriarchial and autocratic
environment the student was
powerless to exert influence in any.
but the most indirect methods.
Finally by the end of the nineteenth
century, students were being
allowed to think and act for
themselves, but only in their non-
academic lives. In 1971 students
are still fighting for control of their
own lives, both in the academic
and non-academic sphere. The
resistance on the part of
administration and faculty is not
nearly so great, but until such
power IS gained, there will be
continuing pressure for reform.

The goal of the student movement
in this sense is not only student
control of student lives, but also
student voice in decision-making
for the university. The goal is to
have all constituencies of the
university determine policy and
goals rather than have any one
constituency make determinations
for the other. Justification for
student involvement in the
university decision-making process
can be made in several ways. Dr.
Earl McGrath, in Should Students
Share the Power, provides six
basic rationales for student
participation in decision-making.

/ PAGE 51

WHO

SHALL

GOVERN,

WHO

SHALL

RULE?

One, if education is so important to
life's well-being, and if students
are to be recipients of the benefits
of education, they should have a
voice in determining its character
and quality. Two, because of
increased concern with their own
education and concern over
inadequacies of many university
processes, student participation in
governance offers much in the way
of potential for the reform of higher
education. Three, providing
students opportunities for
participation in university
governance is a logical concept
when considered in light of the
purposes of a democratic society
and the purposes of institutions of
higher education within that
society. Four, providing students a
voice in academic bodies could
bring instruction closer to what
contemporary society requires that
students learn and make higher
education more relevant to the real
needs of people. Five, students
should have the right to govern
their own lives, which can be
provided by student participation
in governance and the abolition of
"in loco parentis." Six, because
students are in such a unique
position for the observation of
teaching, they are perhaps best
prepared to judge the teacher's
fulfillment of his professional
duties and obligations; therefore,
the student's role in the evaluation
reform of teaching should be a
major one.

In addition to Mr. McGrath's
reasons, there are others, one of
which is that the shared
responsibilities of students, faculty,
and administration of a joint
authority creates a vehicle for freer
communication and by including
students, creates a much greater
likelihood for responsible student
involvement in university affairs.
Another reason is that the
increased communication inherent
in cooperation between all groups
generates better understandings
and better feelings all around and

PAGE 52 /

significantly lessens the chance for
misunderstanding. Thirdly, joint
efforts at decision-making
engender a community feeling
which arises from participation in a
common enterprise. Joint effort
makes cooperation necessary;
tolerance and respect for other
groups and their opinions are
required in order to make the
concept work. An important
underlying concept that supports
student participation in university
governance, though, is the concept
that in a free society all those
affected by a social policy have a
right to a voice in its formulation.
This concept is applicable to the
formulation of policy and to the
decision-making processes within
institutions of higher education.

The symbolic workhorse of
university governance at Tulane is
the University Senate, a body made
up of administrative officers and
deans, faculty members, and
students. The total number of
voting members is 48, with the
largest group represented being
the faculty with 30 members. There
are four student members in the
Senate, the 11 college deans, and
the three top administrative
officers of the University. In the
origanizational structure of the
University, the University Senate is
the legislative body through which
legislation must pass on its way to
the President and the Board.

The highest authority within Tulane
is the University Board of
Administrators, whose power is
established by an act of the
Louisiana State Constitution (Act
43, 1884). The Board delegates
authority to the President of the
University, who in turn delegates
much of his authority to other
officers of the University, such as
matters of admissions to the
Director of Admissions, academic
matters to the Deans of the
respective college, athletics to the
Director of Athletics, and financial
matters to the Business Manager
and Comptroller.

The University Senate is
empowered to make
recommendations to the
administration on all matters of
general University concern as well
as the right to review actions of any
division of the University. If a
Senate recommendation is not
acceptable to the Board of
Administrators, the Board must

notify the Senate in writing of the
reasons for its decision. All
changes in academic policy that
are of general University concern
must be submitted to the Senate
for consideration. The Senate may
in turn delegate matters within its
jurisdiction to its standing or its
special committees.

The committee structure of the
University Senate is one of the
wonders that is Tulane. There are a
total of 20 standing committees,
ranging from the Committee on
Faculty Academic Freedom,
Tenure, and Responsibility, to the
Committee on Patents, to the
Committee on Student Affairs, to
the Committee on Admissions, to
the Committee on Committees.

Every conceivable function of the
University is covered by a
committee of one sort or another.

True to the sense of bureaucracy
by which all universities operate,
the University Senate is not all
adverse to referring things to
committee.

Students have direct input to 13 of
the 20 University Senate
committees by way of student
members who are nominated and
elected by the Student Senate. The
Student Senate, by way of quick
definition, is the duly elected
governing body for the students at
Tulane. It is comprised of 53
senators, who are elected by a
proportional representation system
to represent the 1 1 colleges of the
University. The Student Senate,
although quite large, is not nearly
so bogged down in procedure as
the University Senate. The Student
Senate has eight standing
committees which it uses rather
infrequently, choosing to conduct
most of its business on the floor of
the Senate. As a result, the Student
Senate is guilty of some extremely
long meetings, but because the
meetings are generally informal
and Robert's Rules are largely
ignored. Student Senate meetings
are not nearly as stultifying as
those in the University Senate. The
Student Senate's relationship with
the University Senate, other than
the four student members of the
University Senate, is through the
Student Affairs Committee. This
committee, a group of 15 faculty
and staff and five students, is
advisory to the Dean of Students
and to the University Senate on
matters dealing with student
affairs. By playing this role, the

committee is constitutionally
empowered to deal with many
matters that come out of the
Student Senate involving such
things as conduct, housing, and
student organizations.

A redeeming factor of the
committee system of the University
Senate is the frequent
independence of some of the
committees in regard to issues or
questions over which they feel they
have jurisdiction. In many cases a
committee will consider a matter
on its own initiative, or on the
request of another party within the
University. The more traditional
method of placing a matter before
a committee is for it to be referred
by the University Senate. The more
industrious committees do not wait
for such a referral from the Senate
to begin work as they strive to find
their own issues to consider. Other
committees are not so eager to
work and are quite content to do
nothing until the Senate requests
them to act.

A non-redeeming factor of the
University Senate committee
system lies with those inactive
committees that seem determined
to meet as infrequently as possible
and to steer clear of any and all
controversial matters. In several
cases the inaction of a committee
is due to the fact that it might deal
only with an annual event, such as
the awarding of honorary degrees,
the aegis of the Committee on
Honors, or graduation and
commencement, the aegis of the
Committee on Academic
Ceremonies. But in many other
cases the inaction is the result of a
resolution by the committee to
meet rarely and to do nothing.

Student participation on University
Senate committees has had
noticeable effect in many
committees, in the sense of helping
create a more active committee.
The primary reason any committee
is active is due to the desire for
involvement of the chairman, but
probably the second most
prominent reason is the desire for
participation and activity of the
student members. Unfortunately,
the enthusiasm of student
members is quite limited due to the
very small number of students on
University Senate committees. The
majority of committees with
student membership have only two
student members, with a typical
faculty membership of about ten.

Such a minority of students makes
it very difficult for effective student
participation, especially when the
rest of the committee wants to
meet as infrequently as possible.
Basically, though, such a
proportion of students to faculty is
really nothing more than tokenism
masquerading as student
participation.

The problem of determining the
proportion of student membership
on any committee of the University
Senate is a difficult one. At present
there is no rationale at Tulane for
determining the student proportion
on committees. On those
committees which have student
representatives the average
proportion is 20 per cent. The most
student on any committee is five on
the Student Affairs Committee,
which is 25 per cent of that
committee, but two is the more
common number.

One proposition that is put forth by
some theorists in the field of
university governance is the
concept of "one man, one vote,"
for the basis on which to determine
the make-up of university
governing bodies. This theory is
based on the notion that in a
completely democratic society in
which all electors are
presumptively qualified to cast
their ballots, the Supreme Court
doctrine of one man. one vote is
the doctrine to follow. Realistically,
though, in a university setting the
doctrine of "one man, one vote" is
inherently unfair as it would
transfer the power from the Board,
the administration, and the faculty
to the students, or as some others
might submit, to the alumni.
Several other reasons can be
submitted to invalidate a proposal
such as one man, one vote in the
university setting, but vesting all
the power in students, who are by
definition a transcient group,
violates the stability necessary for
the operation of a university.

Another proposition that is put
forth concerning university
governance does have much
credibility is the abolition of the
concept of "student
government "as it applies to
modern colleges and universities.
The connotation of "student
government" is inconsistent with
the present conception held by
students of their role m the
governance of an institution. The

concept of "student government"
accentuates the mythical
separation of education taking
place outside of the classroom as
well as inside. "Student
government" perpetrates an
artificial separation between two
aspects of a student's life that
should not be separated, that is.
his life inside the classroom and
out. The concept of "student
government" and the practice of it
violates the whole concept of
community. A proponent of student
participations strongest argument
is based on the concept that all
members of the University
community have a right to share in
the formulation of the rules and
laws under which they shall live.

Taking into consideration what has
been said so far and the
implications it has for Tulane. the
logical conclusion is that there is a
need for a master plan for student
participation. To date students are
included on many University
committees, but there is no reason
for the number of students on each
committee. Students are members
of the University Senate, but in
such a small minority that the mere
numbers of faculty and
administration present can be a
very numbing experience and can
make effective participation
extremely difficult. The other
conclusion that becomes apparent
is the great desirability of creating
at Tulane a community
government, suited to Tulane. and
abolishing in name and symbolic
importance of "student
government" or. for Tulane. the
Student Senate. The Student
Senate will almost always be
needed to serve as a forum for
opinion of the students as well as
coordinator of student activities,
but for the purposes of
government, hopefully the Senate
will no longer be needed. The new
form of government for Tulane
would be nothing more than
putting on a sound basis the
concept of student participation in
University government. To effect
the change in government requires
two things; one. an infusion of
students, and two. a basis for the
proportion of student membership.

The proportion of students on
University committees varies
greatly at Tulane. The highest
proportion is 40 per cent on the
Committee for the Academic
Freedom and Responsibility of

/ PAGE 53

WHO

SHALL

GOVERN,

WHO

SHALL

RULE?

students, and the lowest is 15 per
cent on the Committee on Health
Services. Of course there are many
committees where the proportion is
zero per cent because there are no
student members. Due to the fact
that many committees have
functions that are not directly
concerned with students, it makes
sense not to have the same
percentage of students on all
committees. Those committees that
have the greatest degree of
relevance to students should have
the largest percentage of student
membership, but that percentage
should be established.

There are three committees whose
functions deal almost solely and
directly with students: the
Committee on Student Affairs, the
Committee on Housing and Food
Services, and the Committee on
Academic Freedom and
Responsibility. A 40 per cent
student membership already exists
on the latter committee, and using
that as a basis, student
membership on the other two
should be increased to equal 40
per cent of the membership.
Student membership on the
Student Affairs Committee should
continue to increase beyond the 40
per cent established here because
that committee is the most
important one when it comes to
dealing with University rules
affecting students' lives.

There are a great many other
committees within the University
Senate structure that should have
increased student participation.
The percentage of student
membership proposed for these
committees is 33 per cent. The
basrs for this comes naturally from
the tripartite make-up of the
committees, but attempts to
equalize the divisions somewhat
At present the University Senate
constitution states that fulltime
research and teaching faculty must
comprise 75 per cent of a

PAGE 34 /

committee membership, exclusive
of voting student members, and
where otherwise not provided for in
the by-laws. This ruling could still
stand and absorb the new concept
for determining proportion of
student membership. Committees
that would fall under the 33 per
cent rule would be such
committees as the Committees on
Libraries. Admissions. Educational
Policy, Health Services, and others.

For those committees that have
only an indirect effect on students,
student membership equal to 25
per cent is proposed. The basis for
this is that 25 per cent of a total
committee membership would go
beyond the current token student
memberships that now exist on
many committees, but would not
necessitate a complete shift in the
make-up of the committee.
Committees that the 25 per cent
would apply to are: Committees on
Academic Ceremonies. Budget
Review. Physical Facilities, and
Honors. On one University Senate
committee, the Committee on
Faculty Tenure, Freedom, and
Responsibility, a student
membership of two, or 17 per cent
is proposed. The small student
membership is determined by the
importance of the committee in
regard to faculty rights. The
student voice is required on the
committee for the reasons given
earlier, specifically those relating
to the students' unique opportunity
to observe the performance of a
faculty member as a teacher. There
are other committees on which a
small percentage or perhaps even
no student membership is
proposed. Committees such as the
Committee on Faculty Benefits,
Committee on Patents, and the
Committee on Research might
have two "token" students in
recognition of the prerogative of
faculty rights, but also in keeping
in mind the need for student
participation in faculty affairs just
as faculty participate in student
affairs.

In the University Senate itself, it is
proposed that student membership
be increased from the present four
to 20. This large increase is
dictated by the need for
representativeness and for
effectiveness. The system that
would be established for electing
students to the University Senate
would be a proportional
representation system operating

within the Student Senate. Based
on the number of fulltime students,
just as faculty are elected based on
fulltime faculty, the proportional
representation system would place
the emphasis on the college or
division, rather than the Student
Senate at-large. The Student
Senate would be an important
element in the selection process,
but the concept of the Student
Senate being the students' only
legitimate spokesman would be
dispensed with by putting the basis
of power back in the separate
colleges. The Student Senate
would then serve to bring the
colleges together, but not to usurp
their positions. The basis for the
college's representation would be:
one to 500 fulltime students — one
representative; 501-1500 fulltime
students — two representatives:
1501-2500 fulltime students — three
representatives. This would
produce 16 representatives. In
addition the Student Senate will
elect three members of the Student
Senate Executive Cabinet to serve
on the University Senate. (The
Executive Cabinet is the four
officers of the Senate plus the
Chairmen of CACTUS and the
University Center Programming
Board.) The Student Senate will
also elect one member of the
Student Senate Coordination
Board to serve on the University
Senate. (The Coordination Board is
made up of the chairmen of the
seven Student Senate standing
committees). The total number
elected to serve would then be 20.
In comparison, there are 30 faculty
members on the University Senate,
11 deans, and three University
administrative officers. With the
addition of 20 students the total
Senate membership would become
64, giving students just over 30 per
cent of the membership. This is in
line with the concept of committee
membership that would fluctuate
from 25 per cent to 40 per cent.

Ten of the persons elected to serve

on the University Senate would
also serve on the University Senate
Committee on Student Affairs. The
reason for this is the fact that a
great percentage of the legislation
that comes from the Student
Senate must go to the Student
Affairs Committee and thence to
the University Senate. Hopefully
this outmoded method of dealing
with student decisions will be
discarded in favor of letting
student decisions be made by

students or by the appropriate
University official. By effecting
such a change in policy, the
Student Affairs Comniittee would
not spend the better part of a year
debating a matter such as
dormitory visitation hours, which
then had to go to the University
Senate, and then to the Board of
Admmistrators. The four persons
elected from the Executive Cabinet
and the Coordination Board to
serve on the University Senate
would automatically serve on the
Student Affairs Committee as
would six of the 16 other University
Senators. The six would be elected
by the Student Senate after the
elections for positions in the
University Senate had taken place.
The elections for the University
Senate might also take place in the
Student Senate, but only among
the senators from a respective
college rather than the Senate at-
large. The other possibility is that
when each college holds its
elections for the Student Senate a
provision be made to determine the
senators for the University Senate
at the same time.

Without question this proposal
constitutes a radical change in the
form of University governance
employed at Tulane. Without a
need for constitutional change,
though, an effective operating
community government can be
installed to take the place of a
government that approaches the
concept of community, but falls
woefully short. The improved
communications made possible by
including students in decision-
making has shown its worth this
year. To stop the process now
would have negative effects in the
very near future. What needs to be
done is to go forward with the
community government concept
and install it at Tulane. The
benefits of showing such a
confidence in the abilities of the
student body would certainly be
shown in increased responsibility
on the part of students. When
students know the stakes at hand
and are allowed to carry their
share of the load, their perspective
of the institution and its problems
changes, and a total community
effort to improve the quality of
institution can ensue with much
fewer obstacles to overcome than
if students are cast in the role of
second class citizens not eligible
for full citizenship such as now
exists at Tulane.

/discovery
and
diffusion/

It usually starts In Preservation Hall,
one door away from Pat O'briens. In
many cases, the initial jazz encounter
occurs during the same week that a
student first arrives in New Orleans. But
when and where the student finds or
pursues the music during his years in
New Orleans and at Tulane will depend
on his own curiosity, on luck, and often
on the development of his own interest
and understanding of the musical form
and its traditions . .

... In the city, the situations where
the music is played and the reasons
for playing it will vary, A brass band
will turn out for a convention, a festival,
a funeral, or to welcome the Delta
Queen at dockside (for what was to
have been her last visit to New Orleans.
A recent federal dispensation, however,
has allowed the riverboat to continue
its service along the Mississippi). The
New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Fes-
tival, held each spring, will bring out
the silver-haired Bill Russell, the former
curator of the Museum of New Orleans

PAGE 58 /

Jazz, to entertain in Congo Square The
same festival will also feature a concert
aboard another riverboat with the most
articulate drummers in New Orleans.
Lovig Barbarin . . .

. . . and perhaps the smoothest clarine-
tists in the person of Pete Fountain.
Emcee for the evening, a Georgian
named Allen . . Back in Congo
Square, one can find the unique Bongo
Joe, switching his role to piano, while
Dizzy Gillespie assists on the oil drum
Further, one will meet a man named
■Fats", with a derby & a sash that's
labeled "Olympia."

/ PAGE 59

... On the Tulane Campus, variety
is again the password. On the right
night, one can catch an earful of Ger-
man Jazz in der Rathskellar. or the "big
band" sound of Lee Hoppes Tulane
Stage Band. But live performances
don't have to be limited to a stage;
Somehow, WTUL managed to get Dizzy
Gillespie into their studio for a live in-
terview in April. Recorded interviews
and other historical data can be found
in the Jazz Archive on the fourth floor
of the Howard-Tilton Library. There,
one will again meet Richard Allen, who
serves as the curator for the archive.

But to reach a greater awareness of
the entire jazz theatre in New Orleans.
try sitting in on the Music department
course. "The History of Jazz." Taught
by John Joyce, the class (and its two
sections) have been averaging over 70
students in each section; although the
course has many complexities, the
main result which Joyce strives for is
an awareness of musical "perception

. . Perhaps the best way to under-
stand the New Orleans jazz tradition is
to meet and talk with a member of one
of the brass bands (usually a member
who is over 55 or 60 years old). Cur-
rently, the man to see on the Tulane
campus is Matthew "Fats" Houston, an
employee for the Physical Plant since
1946. The same "Fats" Houston leads
almost every major jazz parade or fu-
neral as the Grand Marshal for the
Olympia and Eureka brass bands.

"Fats" can recall the jazz rage back
in the "horse and carriage" period, but
began to get involved in jazz groups
in the mid-forties:

"I began to organize my band at the
end of World War II. I played from one
group to another until I organized my
own band. I played with Louis Dumaine,
and after he died. I organized the group
that was left into Matthew Fats' Hous-
ton's Dixieland Jazz Band. I played up
here in the University vicinity, at the
different fraternities, the SAE. the ATO.
the Kappa Sigma. I played Dixieland
Jazz until rock and roll broke out. When
that happened, every job that I bid on,
they would tell me, I can get two rock

/ PAGE 61

PAGE 62 /

and roll bands for the price that you
want, Fats' I said, ■Well, you can get
the rock and roll!' So that's when I took
my drums and put them up in my living
room, on the side. They're still stored
there.

After that, I started to grand marshal.
I grand marshalled with the Eureka. We
buried Picou first, then Papa Celestin
died. (Papa Celistan had the biggest
funeral, then Picou had the next big-
gest funeral that I grand marshalled
with the Eureka.) Then Bill Matthews
died— he was one of the Eureka. Then
the trombone player died. He was an-
other one of the original Eurekas. And
we buried Kid Clayton. Finally, so many
died out— there were only one or two
left. There was Percy Humphery, he
was the leader. He would sometimes
borrow some of the men from the
Olympia, and would make up a band.
He would bring them together for a
special show or occasion. But after
that, I joined the Olympia myself, and
on up to now, I'm still with the Olympia

. . . Jazz is still part of my life, and
I love it. I will love it until I die. I want
to be put away with the next biggest
funeral that we have in New Orleans.
The last big one was with Cap'n Handy.
We buried him in Pass Christian. Be-
tween seven and nine thousand people
participated in that parade . . .

. . . The jazz funeral means the old
tradition that if you pass, you want to
be waked. At the church we march out
with a dirge, and if the cemetery's
close, we'll march on for a few blocks
with a dirge, then we'll turn the proces-
sion loose, and let it go When they get
about three blocks out of sight, that's
when they start the rejoicing.

With a boom, boom, boom, they start
playing 'When the Saints Go Marching
In. The old folks still feel the same way
about jazz but the young-folks they go
for the new feelings in their rock and
roll and modern jazz . . .

... My whole life, I've been playing
jazz. I still love jazz. I expect to die.
and want to be buried with a traditional
jazz funeral ..."

Matt Anderson

Engineering '71

/ PAGE 63

DORMS

PAGE 64 /

Nearly half the dormitory residents in men's
housing are freshmen. The other residents live on
campus because it is more convenient and possibly
more financially reasonable. This year all men
above the freshman level were given the option of
living off-campus. Because many already "lived" in
fraternity houses and elsewhere off-campus, and
because off-campus housing is generally scarce and

expensive, there was no giant exodus. Men's housing
was operated at capacity level all year.

Dormitory residents who complain about their housing
are usually freshmen. "Its a drag.' The visitation hours,
which prescribe times during which women can visit in
the rooms, have been restricted to Friday. Saturday, and
Sunday evenings from noon until 2 a.m. This has been
the biggest frustration of the residents. To some extent

/ P.4GE 65

these frustrations will be removed when more liberal
hours and weekday privileges are put in effect.

Other "hassles" in dormitory living include excessive

noise and dope. For the most part noise levels are

moderate, and students are able to study in their rooms.

Residents seem fully capable of putting pressure on the

low noise level deviant and there are few problems.

Dope is another bag of its own. Generally speaking,

men have not smoked in the dorms. After the early fall

Conduct Committee cases resulting in stiff fines and

probation, there was little discernable activity in the

rooms. Besides, watching the stars on the University

Center quadrangle while turning on appears to make

people much happier. The dorm room is too confining

and an adviser might get nasty. Rumor has it that there is

one hall in Monroe where it's all a different story. . . .

Campus living can be as good, or as bad, as the

residents want to make it. The mechanism and financing

are available for a variety of social events. Advisers,

being students themselves, generally are aware of

student problems. They can be especially helpful to the

freshman, not so much as an answer man, but more as a

"where-you-can-find-out" man.

If a student lives in a dorm because that is what he wants

it is not unpleasant. If one lives on campus because he

has to live on campus, there results a frustrated resident.

Frustrated residents only frustrate other residents. There

are more than enough frustrations as a student, and

dormitory living should not add to the list.

— Richard Bretz

G.B.A. 72

PAGE 66 /

/ PACE 67

"The residence halls of Newcomb College continue to be a part of the

organizational structure of the College. . . . Regulations for the Newcomb

residence hall . . . are matters of special concern of the

College. . . . The Senate Committee on Student Affairs may inquire and

recommend to the Senate concerning policies in student life matters

throughout the University; consideration of any recommendation affecting

Newcomb College should include recognition of the concern and structure

that exists for these matters within the College."

University Senate Resolution
March, 1971

PAGE 68 /

Newcomb dormitory regulations
change, but not with the times.
Since the members of the Class of
1971 passed the compulsory
examination on the rules and
regulations of resident student in
the fall of 1967. many of the
restrictions with which the
examination was concerned have
been eliminated, but the principle
upon which the rules — and the
tests — are based, continue
unchanged. According to the
constitution of the Resident
Government Association, one of
the purposes of the restrictions is
the "regulation of social activities
in order to protect the welfare of
each student and to obtain
development of individual honor
and the best result in scholarship."
The Newcomb woman must be
looked after.

The changes, as listed, sound very
impressive. Instead of the weekday
1 a.m. curfew, upperclassmen now
have self-regulated hours, and

most own keys to their dormitories.
They are no longer required to sign
in and out every time they wish to
leave the dorms after 8 o'clock.
Freshmen curfews have been set
back two hours, so that on
weekdays, they may return at 1
o'clock instead of having to check
in at 1 1 p.m. Men are allowed into
the women's rooms on week-ends,
within the hour limits set by the
college.

Yet it becomes necessary to ask
why the rules are there in the first
place. They are not needed.
Newcomb women are mature
individuals. By the time they enter
the University, their personalities
are basically developed, and their
character already formed. If their
interests in Newcomb are not
academic, no rules will ever
change that. And if they intend to
make their years in the college a
fulfilling intellectual experience,
they will know how to find the
resources needed for this without
having to be directed to them.

/ P.VGE 69

PAGE 70 /

There has been, in fact, no
noticeable change in the individual
honor or the academic output of
Newcomb students since the
relaxation of the dormitory
regulations. The Newcomb
administration, in allowing the
reforms, showed confidence in the
women's maturity and
responsibility, and have found out
that their confidence was not
misplaced. But there are still rules,
too many rules, which prove only
that the administration's trust is
only partial. And the administrators
have made it clear that new
changes are not likely to occur in
the next two years.

If the need is felt for social as well
as academic guidance for
Newcomb students, especially
freshmen, then the administration
should look to the dormitory
adviser program, not to dormitory
regulations, as a positive way of
providing it. If a student has
problems, she will not find the
solution for them in a set of rules,
but in a set of well-trained,
capable, responsible individuals
willing to respond to their needs.
The adviser system, in the past

year, has been reworked to do just
that. The rules, as they stand, are
superfluous and, for the most part.
they are resented.

Ironically, some of what may be
considered the strictest regulations
imposed upon the women are
almost impossible to enforce
efficiently. It takes little skill to
devise methods of entering and
leaving the dormitories without
ever needing to sign in or out. The
sign out sheets, on the other hand,
help no one by stating that the
student is "in town " or "on
campus." and create only even
more useless paper work.

Often the rules are confusing.
Freshmen are allowed two key
nights a week, a regulation which
has led the house mothers often to
wonder whether a particular
Sunday key night should be
counted with those of the week the
Sunday ended, during which the
student took no key nights, or with
those of the week which the
Sunday began, in which the
student took two. Should the
student be punished with countless
calldowns for taking an illegal

keynight. or congratulated for
keeping her numbers straight? Or,
to ease the complex situation,
should Sundays be made
independent entities and no part of
the week at all?

The time is overdue for
reevaluation and redefinition.
Newcomb College is not now what
it was five or even two years ago. It
is educating a new breed of
students who do not particularly
want to think of Newcomb as one
of the "Seven Sisters of the South."
They wish the emphasis to be
placed on student-faculty-
administration communication, not
condescention.

Slowly, the past years have seen
the parental walls of the Newcomb
fortresses tumble. Like all solidly
built medieval institutions,
however, the structure is not easy
to destroy. Before reconstruction
can begin. Newcomb students, it
seems, will have to wait until
erosion overcomes the remaining
walls.

— Ileana Oroza

Newcomb 71

for: fiirfh control infcrn.afiC
Or -fo Kau* Ol prtqnancu -k
- Qo "h) Dr. SeasTrunck;^ <m
rt^c second, floor' of -H^t
f4«CLlt-h Center' — ihe.

' Counceii'>^Ci J FSyCh.alr.t
Seciion ^-- call eni. 2SI
Onrt ask for hin]

^ fJoT go +* ih€ reaular
nwdtcaL c/paK .'

^auLtl\i'\, OMcL discuss Jui.

'■

I '.'* '

/ PAGE 71

f TlIENEWOKLEAI«SCatOiJI>,in.iMi»^ MI^IXON

f ''VICTIMS ©F DUTViA-^"-"^"")

I iMVIL II Ihrwifh :». >l«l)ll:i rxrrpt Mnmlny * Wnliit-Mli»; mrulo OiUI RM.

it terwllTh|i*In-*i»V«.i«iurT<mSl.l%««'»HT«>rlrr«..V^«rt™i»«

I adndHdwdXJe a<adnuji«I.IHt rmrmulowiXK>'«7IX.IX«Mi-l«MIKM.

Like most major universities in the United States,

Tulane lias had its share of campus unrest. Unlil<e

other campuses, however, Tulane has yet to witness

bloodshed or over-reaction by campus or municipal

authorities. The man responsible for keeping the

peace on the Tulane campus. Director of Security

Robert Scruton, has won the admiration of students,

the respect of most faculty members (in itself, no

mean accomplishment), and consideration of his

viewpoint by the University administration.

The Colonel, as he is called, is a study in complexity.

He's a retired army officer who rose from the ranks;

he's an accomplished tennis player; he won a

shipboard costume contest by dressing as Tiny Tim;

he's a man with a theatrical sense of timing that can

provide good copy for any campus newspaper

reporter.

Scruton's a difficult man to work for. Many officers

have quit the force in disagreement with the Colonel

or his policies. Students faced with multiple traffic

offences get a taste of his "sting 'em a little"

policy — reducing the fine so that it still hurts, but it

does not bankrupt the student for the rest of the

semester. The vast majority of Tulane students, when

involved in a security matter, come away impressed

by the fairness and helpfulness of the security

department.
PAGE 72 /

From Tulane's first anti-ROTC demonstrations

staged by the theatre department, to the

Dubinsky — ROTC demonstrations to the birth of the

Tulane Liberation Front and the ROTC barracks fire

in the spring of 1970, Scruton has competantly and

efficiently handled the situation without recourse to

excessive force. Scruton's calmness and good sense

are credited by many with saving the day during the

T.L.F. occupation of the University Center. He was

the one voice of moderation who would not close the

U.C. and evict the demonstrators.

Observing the Colonel is a study of a man under

pressure. The nature of his job subjects him to

pressures from faculty, staff, students,

administration, alumni, and the community. As such,

he is perpetually out on a limb. Only his flexible

attitude and uncanny sense of what each special

interest group will tolerate has kept Scruton's

position reasonably secure. When asked what he

would like to be remembered for after he leaves

Tulane, Scruton replies: "well, I think the biggest

accomplishment would be simply having been able

to survive in this job with all the pressures on me."

-Bill Klinkenstein

G.B.A. '71

SCRUTON ON TULANE STUDENTS: "Tulane students are much smarter, less
docile, they want to know why and wherefore, far more curious . . . they don't
like a lot of bullshit and crap thrown at them.'

SCRUTON ON THE SECURITY DIVISION:". . . a force of ten or twelve
seasoned officers can serve the University well. The word "seasoned" bears repe-
tition. Seasoned." (Tulane Self-Study. 1967-1968)

SCRUTON ON SCRUTON: "Fortunately. 1 can see the funny side of everything,
no matter how serious a situation can be. A sense of humor is a saving grace to
keep you going in this job. . . . As long as I'm here (and this is a natural thmg)
theforce will represent what I want it to be. . . . A great part of my life was
devoted to dealing with young people — not young students, but young soldiers—
basically they're not much different. They can spot a phoney at a thousand
yards. . . . I've always said, that when I do quit, its going to be under the most
favorable conditions when things are going smoothly and everything is runnmg
right so I can turn over a going organization to my successor."

/ PACE 73

THE GOMPLEAT

. . . at Tulane, a campus officer needs to be
competent in 17 different skills. He must be prepared
to exercise his competence at any time, so varied are
the situations he must contend with.

He must be taught enough practical law so that he
does not ensnarl the university in a legal action
because of his ignorance. He must be taught the
rights of others in police procedure.

He must be taught how to handle a wild drunk or a
deranged person, male or female. Such techniques
are not learned overnight. Neither are the special
ways of dealing with teenage deliquents.

He must be shown how to put out a fire, and when
to call the fire department, and what to do when the
engines arrive, and how to deal with toxic smokes
generated by fires.

He must know about drugs and narcotics, the
stimulants and the depressants— enough so that he
can recognize abnormal behavior and the reason for

it.

He must know how to help an injured person, what to
do for that person and where to take him.

He must be taught how to write a proper parking
ticket and a speeding ticket. And he must be shown
how to investigate an accident.

He must be shown how to write a proper report,
factual and objective, why reports are important and
why they should be reasonably literate.

He must be taught to understand the nature of young
people, young students, and why some are perhaps

not as orderly as they should be. He must be trained
to be neither over-harsh nor over-easy in dealing
with their pranks and high jinks. He must be taught
to understand that matters are not always black or
white but often are "gray" and hard to define. It must
be explained to him that some persons make a
practice of baiting or insulting police, and that this is-
aimed not so much at the officer as a person, but at
the symbol of law and order in general.

He must be taught courtesy — a firm politeness under
any and all conditions. He must be shown that an
officer who descends to rudeness and brutality even
in dealing with human trash is a poor officer and a
liability to his unit.

He must be trained to deal witl;i sexual deviates, to
know that often such people are less criminal that
"sick" in mind. He must be shown about fingerprints,
how to lift them from evidence and transfer them to
photographs or tape for comparative purposes. He
must be taught the techniques of elementary
investigation and interrogation, and the rights of
persons undergoing questioning. He itiust be taught
how to operate the high-speed camera equipment
used to make identification cards, and he must know
how to make background checks of persons seeking
employment with the University.

He must be taught how to use and fire his gun, that
an officer may use his gun only to save his life or that
of another, beyond reasonable doubt in a Court of
Law.

He must study the Division Policy Manual and the
University Traffic Regulations, and he must know
these documents as he would the alphabet and the
multiplication tables. He must be shown how the
university is organized and the names and functions
of its principal officals. It must be explained to him
that his unit is but a part of a complex organization
and that its primary purpose, aside from the
numerous chores and services assigned to it, is the
protection of property and people.

Finally, the officer must be periodically examined to
determine his proficiency and to aid in the decision
whether he should be discharged or retained and
given recognition in the form of a pay raise or
promotion in rank

— Robert A. Scruton

Tulane University Self-Study,
1967-1968

PAGE 74 /

/ PACE 73

*" ""- "'i-,. 'ci.'^/,, %. % 'Jj; Si. .# :«^ ^ .a"- .<o -.o'^

'°«c,

jaykaysergeofgekee-K/o,^^^ °<:n,p^^

'^iiyk

••■"Pp*

"'"'We

o*"^'

«ti^"'

*v^^

^e^^^t..^

-'*^:^cxx:e^^o^^^^s^^...^ .„^<^=^^^^

baAarahickingbotlomandyWcldmanmarg,e,,„„^^ "'"ncferdhen ™*;;'--''Pla„ja„„;^PW 4=«'SBa«<n8««''-''"'"""""'"'^'='"J^"^l"'ea2leymeryibccker

guerardpgi
marciagumpe

!!;:!!^^^'".'e;si-fi-"::r:S^-::e>-

riosM'

griccca,hygnrr,srredgrubisswaltB™ndyrongubac4"f„7,"';7'^A'rsc/,^,";i^^^^^^^^^ , ^Us.abemsuomannebeu'

„i.Ubro«"''-bl,ckma„cvabl,ck™„,,,,„,bookoscli.abe'hboycrfeL«envana„nallern,,c

iclalanbeychokcharlouerbeycr

biW8«

„„eUssabtammeT>a.

■lollendebbiedmi

I u,,r,nop^rpThver';bcnnvai;ame!anncaredojohnccarcymarchandersonjoanarboiiraniiearnoldbotsiaro(isi>iirayatiaiiasiobetsybatdridgeshei!abaloIstevebancrofI
lencbuchallercourtneyburgesanaraouniigtsL'-iLrjvi j

{

•

i^i^

'CACTUS: A Thorn m the Side of Indifference.

Although many of us cringe today when we hear this rather

dated slogan, it is still a valid description of what CACTUS

does and what CACTUS hopes to do in the future. Over the

past few years the thorns may have changed direction, and

the sides may not be the same ones as before, but the

premise behind CACTUS still exists unchanged: that a

college education cannot and must not be limited to a

classroom — an awareness of ones environment and

participation in it is necessary for an education and the

understanding and betterment of one's world.

It is for this reason thatCACTUS exists: to provide students

with opportunities to learn about their surroundings while

applying their knowledge to help the community, be it city,

campus, or both.

'^t*'.-L:^i:>»

^^:c5j^t^i^^^^^•

Although CACTUS has had programs
operating in the New Orleans community for
many years, a campus direction is new for
the organization. It was decided over a year
ago that if a group is to be an effective lini<
between the campus and the community then
it must be a viable force on campus as well.

For this reason, Campus Projects was
established to investigate the opportunities
for CACTUS involvement on campus, and to
develop programs of on-campus activity. As
an initial task. Campus Projects has
undertaken a comprehensive study of student
attitudes at Tulane. The results of this
research will be available to anyone, and it
will enable CACTUS to better evaluate the
desires and needs of our students, leading to
the development of campus programs.

In addition. CACTUS, in co;>f5eration with
the Sub-Committee on IVlmority Employmen
is preparing a booklet fo(r distribution to all
wage and staff employees at the University.
This booklet will contain
obtaining such commun
aid. health care, and farr

information on

ty resources as legal

ily assistance.

In the community as we as on campus

CACTUS is expanding to provide types of
involvement different from those that have
been offered in the past. This year CACTUS
was allowed direct input into a citizen's
planning group when it was given a seat on
the Regional Planning Forum. This year a
major part of the Forum's activities revolved
around the controversial fvlississippi River
bridge crossings. Hopefully, opportunities for
direct student participation in decision-
making bodies in the community will increase
in the future. In another new type of
involvement for the organization. CACTUS
worked with Tulane law students in the
setting up and operation of the Legal Referral
Service of the Mardi Gras Coalition.
providing legal assistance to hundreds of
people during the holiday period. In addition.
Volunteer Clearinghouse, a new CACTUS
program, is providing students to fill
specialized volunteer positions throughout
the city.

These are but a few of the many new
directions that CACTUS has explored and
must continue to explore in the future. The
possibilities for different types of student
involvement and input into the community
and campus are great.

Recently CACTUS has been emphasizing its new

directions. These are, of course, important to the

organization, equally important are the regular

programs in which a majority of the CACTUS

members participate. These projects have proven to

be worthwhile for both the Tulane students as well as

the recipients of the aid, and are continued because

they can effectively fill needs. Project Opportunity,

CACTUS' first program, graduated its first group of

high school seniors last year. 32 of the 33 seniors

currently attend college, and these seniors were able

to generate $45,000 in first year financial aid.

Project DARE, expanded this year to include two

schools, McDonogh 15 in the French Quarter as well

as Henderson Dunn in the Desire Area, is beneficial

to and enjoyed by the children, and parents and

school officials believe it is a great experience.

CACTUS volunteers to Kingsley House have

provided tutorial and recreational services needed

by this settlement house in the Irish Channel.

In CACTUS' earliest days, many people expected

infant mortality to strike the organization at any time.

However, during the early stages of the group, there

were enough people dedicated to the CACTUS

concept to see that this potential problem was

overcome. Since then, involvement in CACTUS has

grown at a rate to insure its continuance. But this has

caused many problems to arise in the organization.

Solutions to very mechanical problems, such as

maintaining good volunteer records, are easy to

implement; the most difficult problems arise in the

fact that CACTUS programming involves

interpersonal relationships, where motivational

factors, expectations, dedication, and personality

differences all come into play. Progress has been

made in being able to employ these factors to the

benefit of the organization, but often a conflict arises.

This is the organization problem to which CACTUS

must continue to direct itself, in order to be as

effective as it possibly can.

The time of hard decisions is not over for CACTUS.

CACTUS must continue to be self-critical to work for

better programs and be searching for new ideas

which meet needs of the campus or community, and

fit student interests. By its very nature, CACTUS must

continually change in order to achieve its goals. In

ten years CACTUS may still be using "The Thorn in

the Side of Indifference" as its slogan, but the thorns

and the sides will be different — if they weren't,

CACTUS would not exist.

— John Carey

A&S'71

PAGE 82 /

NE score and two years ago, I played Doctor-Dan-the-Band-
age-Man and decided, in a moment of ridiculous grandiosity,
that I wanted to be a physician.

Two years later, I underwent some interviews that were

pregnant with foreshadowing. A favorite question at these

"talks" was always why I wanted to be a doctor. At the time,

the answer that that's what my daddy did seemed quite adequate. Another

point which appeared to impress my judges was that I had instigated

original research into Little Golden Books, built my own log cabins, and

even experimented with handwriting.

Needless to say, (pardon the pretention) I was easily accepted that year to
the P.S. 38 Queens Kindergarten (it may be that the letter of Rec. from the
Chief of Nursery School helped a little), and began the arduous graded
educational journey culminating with, as I Freudianly slipped often in later
years, med stool.

I turned to find my hand below my waist and the surgical scrub nurse yelling
at me to quickly divest, depressurize, and desist the "Field," or something. I
informed her that I was an expert puzzle-fixer. She asked (exclaimed!)
"Where'd YOU go t' skewl, bo-eh? ' I answered proudly, "P.S. 38." Later,
the surgeon supported my ego by reassuring me that he felt I had the hands
of a psychiatrist.

I began to perceive that time had not been at all quantized, for the years of
primary, secondary, tertiary, and the first three years of quaternary amentia
had obiously congealed and clotted in my mind. Only scattered were debris
of a spelling bee, swim meet, high school play, physics instructor vague
football games, a dismembered corpse in the lab, == ■==>-■ -h for the obev
snoring in boredom of the dog, grey-yellow nights > and neck-a

midnight mornings with needles, noise and nu
in a fetid fecal-odored ward, writing and achii..
enduring professors who didn't believe in psychiatry or abortions.
Newcomb girls who didn't believe in God or fellatio.

Of a sudden, it is all interesting cocktail clack t, whatever your

favorite metaphor, is gone, the long proverbia eryone always talked

about lies more in the crevasse that follows e. ^tep. The future may

not be quantized, eith ' "cially the next fou; .l' icn years, which I will
spend in further train n the everpresent. non-belabored hope that I

am not squandering the best years of my life in preparation for the worst.

/ PAGE 83

HISTORY NIGHTMARE

¥:

Doctor: Hello there. What's the trouble?
Patient: That's for you to find out, ain't it, Doc
Doc: Yes. Uh-huh. What I mean is, how you feelin'?

Doc: Where?

Pt: All over.

Doc: Any specific pain?

Hi; uri no. I jusi nun irom my head to my toes.

PAGE 84 /

Doc: Can you describe the pain?

Doc: How long have you been feeling this way?

Doc: What I mean is, how long have you had this pain?

Pt: Oh, I'd say since about the time when I got sick.

Doc: And when was that?

Pi. Auoui the same tune as rny sistei J.

Doc: Well, how old is the child now?

Pt: Poorthinci died in childbir

Doc: OK. Let's try another approach — Are there any members of your

family who are or have been sick with this type of thing?
: .. _ - Liy Miuvv. naveii l i^en none ui uiein since i

Doc: Have you ever been in this hospital before?

3 about four years old.
Doc: Why was that?

arxc^o, yuu cApect me to reriici, c.

Doc: Excuse me a moment.
Pt: What's the trouble?
Doc: I have a headache.

.. .-^..^ ..^.^ y^-^ oeen feelin' this way?

'Written in Sophomore year, while on the wards
awaiting instructor the first day of Physical
Diagnosis. We were to begin that day to apply the
history-taking method we had been taught to real
people.

/ PACE 8.5

LOVE

The chimera fibrillates

On a filionyx agar

And flaunts its papillary nebulae

At the mediastinal flaw.

The arytenoid emanates
A deep pleural spasm:
A cataplectic murmur
From philiogenic entombment.

As anarthria bows
To pterygoid transmutation
Of the ablated embolus,
The sceptre speaks.

10/30/67

GOODBYE, ZEAL.

When digitalis left me cold,
I tried an hour of Donne;
And realized, thus, anon, behold:
That school just is not fun.

As basic sciences are pedantic
and bore for factuality,
So the humanities crawl in semantic
Paradox and generality.

I thought — To transcend Medicine!
— The world of live or die . . .
In novel class, I found but Sin,
Reality, and Why.

Oh sad, that after years to train
Through studies long and grueling,
To come to terms with one's own brain
That's learned to loathe all schooling.

4/4/69

REFLECTIONS ON A 1-DAY VACATION.

Fastly free
fixed at anonymity
in the tornado of time

Ecstatically alea
with unit homonymity
and indulgence of prime

Diseased of delight
fever of nothingness
convulsant with relief

Triumphantly trite

afloat in the meaningless
devoid of belief

One pillow-case-calm night;
then back to parading
the plague of ambition

In the prescribed rite
of Thirst mascarading
with false deglutition.

1/70

PAGE 86 /

SUTURING LEON

Drugged and lacerated
Bundled like a bunny

in a straight-jacket of stupor

and silent pain
he sleeps.

O Mother,
thou wouldst leave little bunting for
an obscene phone call
Leave him to the merciless guilt-laden hands
of the amateur seamster

equipped with hypo and masked with gown.

In a tile torture cubicle
seeming punishment

for defending Quijote
this chamber of screams
incongruity intrinsic
poverty prolific
ignorance staple

the eye meticulously mended
the Selvage rebeckons

needle-tracks

drunken-auto gash

stab to the stomach

hatchet to the head

bullet to the groin
O, Mother

for which atrocity

in his personal melodramic
will he next call.

Emergency Room,
Charity, 5/19/70

/ PAGE 87

^<ing back

It is a year to know loneliness: to feel it envelope
you in the chill romance of more light rains than you
thought possible, or to recognize it through the
incomparable joy of meeting up with a friend and
the two of you setting off to visit cities you may still
feel you had no right to see: for the cities were
there long before you and will not change with your
coming, and there is something profane in your
American newness and glitter which you wish you
could shake, leave hidden in an Austrian snow or
up in the room in your pension.
But then again, the cities are too grand to be
harried by your small vulgarity.
-And, strangely enough, it is a year to feel the
surprise in yourself when you look at the stone
turned into a man by a mere man, and a cathedral.

god, the cathedrals, and a painting, and you fight

the tears and the awe in admitting that there had to

be something somewhere, some glorious

meaning— maybe in the artists themselves, or maybe

they knew what it was. and maybe you're closer to it

now for being closer to them. You do know, and

you feel yourself becoming so very much greater

and smaller as you realize, and your interests

increase five fold and your emotions ten.

And then, if you're lucky and if you're willing, and

we all were, you have become a part of it all and

you can see the difference between you and the

visitors, and you're proud and humble, and

independent, and so much older, and some of It

even remains through the beating you take in

coming home.

—Rick Drake, A & S '71

University of Hamburg
1969-1970

poem written in paris caf^

sitting in a cafe
rue Dante
parispicturesque
the thing

to do

you know
writing a poem
bitchy mood

couldbeanywhere
sitting alone in pariscafelife
writing a poem
the thing

you know

to do

doing nothing

only wasting paperthoughts
sitting alone in pariscafelife
writing a poem about:

writing a poem
you know
the thing
to do

cafe select, blvd. montparnasse

sipping days

hours
blinks

afternoon poured by sighing

into mist of hot wine thoughts

eyeing through cafe-window passing

in and out of cafe-world

to streetworld

some never voyaged near our land

we scanned the universe

of us

touching very little

maybe even then too much

of what never has an answer

we did not save the world

nor try to save ourselves

the trouble

of asking the question

only our empty wineglasses know

PAGE 90 /

champselyseeseyes

champselyseeseyeslife peopling through eyemind
parisdrunk on peoplesights impressions
heavy air-incensed jasminemist
greenjade-screened city
mystery-clung spectred lovestoned city
walking down champselysees

fractionglimpsed eyes of one whom i loved splitsecondly
rushdistance crowdfaced hypnotized

unspeakable

ohiloveyou champselyseeseyes

forever
I'll search everywhere for your holygraillove
craning through street-throngs metrobodies

until i find you
or

something approximate

la pubeile

below

boul' miche street

so winterbarren yesterday

is today

springreened of monet tints

leafbrushed thickly

on canvasbarked branches

splotched yellow sometimes

blossoms

dogs shit on sidewalks

for unwary pedestrians

bereted frenchmen pee in pissoirs

one can whiff it in the parisair

perfumed with channel or st. laurent

and from my windowseat

i see irontip of eiffel tower

peek above parisgray rooftops

as i spysecretly on sunset pinktinge

a whitebent man with

red-and-green-plaid sack

crookedly rumages in garbage can

across the street

for something

he doesn't find

so leaves

without

putting back the lid

-Nancy Harris. Newcomb 71
Sorbonne, 1969-1970

/ PAGE 91

I spent my first two years at Newcomb learning to be a clocl<-

watcher. Having to cram five courses into 960 minutes of my

working day, my life ran on a schedule so that not one

productive moment would be lost. With such efficiency. I

became what was demanded of me, an academic machine of

mass production. Not until my Junior year abroad in England

did I bury my clocks and discover people.

"Man should not live by the clock alone." This is perhaps

the most valuable lesson I learned from the English. Time

became dependant not on the passing of minutes, but on the

experiences that occurred within those minutes,

experiences that transcended the purely academic sphere

and involved "living in the moment with people."

Such experiences were possible in an educational

environment that placed more emphasis on independant

studies than required assignments, more emphasis on

creative thinking than memory skills; a system where

pressure is an American word. I do not mean to idealize the

English system, for in several areas it is weak. But I do think

the confidence given to the student to create his own

learning schedule promotes a much healthier attitude

towards time.

The British students seemed to place as much importance

on hours spent in discussion during coffee breaks as on

hours spent in the isolation of books and the library. As a

consequence, the learning experience became not a mere

compartment of one's life, buta total activity. Returning to

New Orleans. I can feel myself being caught up again in the

clockwork machinery. One hopeful note is that the clocks in

the library are never on time.

— Nora Riley, Newcomb '71

University of East Anglia.

1969-1970

HI-

PAGE 92 /

Each returning Junior Year Abroad student returns to
Tulane his senior year with his own set of memorabilia.
Each underwent a separate and unique experience,
and I can only talk about how living abroad affected me
personally.

First of all. you notice the differences in the
educational system. The British system encourages
much more initiative on the part of the student. He is
not constantly deluged with bi-weekly quizzes or mid-
terms in each subject. Indeed, many students in the
liberal arts, like myself, had only one battery of
examinations (in May and June), covering the course
work for the entire year. The students thus have much
more opportunity to ration their own time, and can, for
instance, spend a few weeks going into depth in just
one of his courses he is interested in following up.

All final examinations are essay, giving the student a
wide range of questions from which to pick. It is
assumed that he will have a basic understanding of his
course; so rather than examining a superficial
knowledge of the entire course, finals test students in
several particular aspects of the course which the
student himself picks to study.

Instead of quizzes, term papers are stressed and
tutorials are offered with specialists in your field.
Extensive outside reading is required, but you don't
notice how much you are reading because you are
picking out the books you want to read, rather than
having a single textbook you have to memorize the
night before a test.

You are not as dependent on the professor for learning
his interpretation of a work of literature or of a period of
history. Instead, you are forced into making your own
interpretations and defending them In your papers and
in your discussions with your tutor. Thus, individual
research is stressed, and not simply copying down a
lecturer's notes and memorizing his own point of view
and his own bias.

You emerge from your year of study with a feeling that
perhaps you have not learned more individual facts or
picky details that you can recall at a moment's notice.

but that you have certainly made your own opinion,
formed your own interpretation. This gives you a much
greater pride of accomplishment and scholarly feeling
than you usually get in an undergraduate American
institution.

What, though, is it like to live in Europe for a year? First
of all, you realize that you cannot possibly hope to
comprehend a foreign culture, to immerse yourself in it
completely and to understand it fully without living
there for an extended period of time. You can truly
understand neither Shakespeare nor the British general
election without having experienced England. Indeed a
year seems really so short! But how much better it is
than simply going over in the summer, travelling around
with other Americans, rapping with them, visiting the
typical American college summer tour haunts: 14
countries in 21 days! You can understand English
history and politics. English literature — indeed, the
English themselves — only by being constantly
bombarded by the same impressions and feeling the
same pressures they do, on a day-to-day basis,
certainly not by staying at the London Hilton for a week.

The University hall is a great place to meet people. You
actually get to know all the people in the hall. Mine was
a typical example. I was the hall Yank. The rest of the
residents were English, about 160 of them, together
with about 20 Scots, two Nigerians, a Syrian, two
Melanese, a Welshman and a Russian. The hall is much
more of an integral unit in England than the dormitory
is here in the U.S. We ate out meals together, we
studied and played together. There was no cer
campus at my university (typically so in Englar
was a 20 minute walk to the classroom buildmgs and
the halls themselves were separated from each other.
You gradually become Anglicized after about live or six
months there. On weekends we would roam the
Yorkshire moors.

I miss it all.

Jim Dalfares, A. & S. 71

University of Sheffield.

1969-1970

/ p.vcE 93

r ^

fs.

Law students are often accused of living in oblivion
to the community and the campus. Yet, two of the last
three presidents of the Tulane Student Senate were
law students. This year's head of the University
Center Board is a law student. And the Direction
program was conceived, organized, and still is
staffed in important roles by law students.

More dramatic, however, are law students' activities
off campus. For example, this year they created a
Consumer Protection Clinic, under the auspices of
the Law School, to help wage the consumers' war for
better products and less abuses. At present, the
Clinic involves only law students, but soon it will
include students from other schools in the University.
Already, it has valuably aided many harried
consumers and, in the process, afforded students
practical experience in a widening area of law.

The most important work by law students this year
came via the internship some clinic members served
with the New Orleans Legal Assistance Corporation.
Through this organization, students worked in
neighborhood offices, advising consumers of their
rights and remedies for certain problems. In another
area, other students formed a research team to study
and evaluate data on specific consumer problems.
This team focuses upon a particular area each year,
and in its first year has analyzed credit practices and
debt collection measures in New Orleans.

PAGE 94 /

In the future, Clinic members will move into
consumer education, hoping to make people more
aware of comparison shopping, and of typical fraud
practices, and of what they can do to fight them.
Finally, the Clinic will examine existing legislation to
help draft new laws. This work comes from careful
economic and legal research, and may prove a
useful tool in guiding local legislative action.

/ PACE 95

r ^

r^l

s?:

While consumer problems occupy some students,
others work in programs aimed at securing the due
process rights of the poor. The Release On
Recognizance program has helped many people
charged with crimes to secure bail for which they are
eligible, but too poor to afford. The Constitution
assures a quick trial and a fair judicial process; both
assurances however, are abrased when they must sit
in jail for weeks and even months awaiting trial,
merely because they could not afford bail.

Under tightly supervised government procedures,
students help to secure the release, on their
recognizance, of some of these indigents. To qualify,
the indigent must show ties to the community strong
enough to insure a high chance that he will turn up at
his trial. To date, the program has proved a large
success.

I i

In another dramatic development this spring, the
Louisiana Supreme Court ruled to permit students an
opportunity by which they can tell prospective
employers they've had actual courtroom experience.
Under the supervision of practicing attorneys,
seniors can now work in civil cases that do not
involve a fee, and in some criminal cases. In the
criminal area, they can work for either the defense or
the prosecution. This program is a unique
educational venture that should also aid defendants
whose cases require close attention, but who cannot
afford a good lawyer. It will be run under the

PAGE 96 /

J Y L/L- , I g/// 7 0/''-''' ^' •

You have the right to use the telephone .

You need not make any statement i thot is. you have a
right to remain silent ■•

Anything you say may be used against you in +ria\ .

You have a right to consult UJrth ond obtain the advice of an
attorney , before ansiuering any questions .

\f you cannot afford an alforncy . the court \3S\\\ obtdvn
on attorr\ey io represent you and advise you .

You have a right to have your ottomey or an appointed aHorney
present at the time of any questioning or giving of ony statements .

If you are charged Luith a -felony, you have a right to reauest
pref/minary examinotion by a magistrate ■•

DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
CITY OP NEW ORLEANS

JOSEPH \. G\^^RUs.so

SUPEMNTENDENT

auspices of the law school and the Moot Court, and
honors organization that provides training and
experience in trial w/ork.

These activities represent a shift from what law
students have long been taught to do. Obligations to
scholarship are not. however, less today. But when
the Law School moved this fall into its new quarters
in the former library building, it moved also into a
new era. The curriculum is much expanded, and new
programs such as these now exist to carry students
to new steps beyond the confines of the classroom,
affording them practical education and the
community needed and constructive services.

—James Farwell

Law 71

/ PAGE 9'J

ARCHI

PAGE 98 /

FECTURE

evolution

beyond all precedent

|"We stand with one foot in the Renaissance and the other in a world which
announces itself through the most profound social and technological
revolution in man's history. It is an evolutionary revolution, but unlike any
before, the pace of the evolution is accelerated beyond all prior
precedent. "

It was as an effort to respond to the changes referred to in the above by the
late John W. Lawrence. Dean of the School of Architecture, that a reevalua-
tion and modification of the structure of the School has occurred. Buildings
do not exist independent of their surroundings: they must be woven into the
intricate fabric created by an ever increasingly complex culture.

In recent years, questions have been raised concerning the environment
which is being created, and the needs of the people who live in it. During
the past two years, through the efforts of both students and faculty, the
School of Architecture embarked on its reevaluation.

A curriculum committee consisting of students and faculty was established,
and questionaires were distributed to help determine what courses shoud
be added, changed or dropped to make the curriculum more relevant to the
students' needs. Under the resulting changes, certain humanity and science
requirements were reduced. Increased emphasis has been placed on
conceptual sketches and drawings in the early years of study and the
understanding of present problems, as well as some glimpse of possible
future problems through reading and lectures.

Technical knowledge such as structural and mechanical systems is also
being made available at an earlier point in the curriculum, serving
multipurpose objectives. Not only does it give the student tangible
knowledge and materials with which to work, but it also allows more time in

later years for investigation into other fields.

A seminar system through which students study fields such as real estate,

financing, urban sociology, and the use of computers in program analysis

has been established and is on an elective basis. The seminar system also

allows for the exchange of ideas between students and professors on a

more informal basis.

/ PAGE 99

A platform system, allowing students who have completed their sophomore
year to choose their design instructor and projects, is being tested.

Combined, these changes present more relevant information to the student
faster and allows more freedom in developing particular interests.

Each problem issued in design class has a myriad of solutions, each having

its own merits and weaknesses. By analysis of varying solutions and the

testing and exchanging of ideas between students and professors of

different backgrounds and experiences, students are taught to think in

conceptual form and to make decisions without attempting to reach

predetermined answers, hopefully developing within the student a mental

process applicable to future problems regardless of their nature.

The School periodically tests theories developed in the academic

atmosphere against existing problems, such as QUARTERFRONT, a study

of the Vieux Carre Riverfront, and takes part in community activities such as

Metro-Link, a local Community Design Center. Under the River Front Project

alternate designs for an expressway along the riverside of the Vieux Carre

and the impact of each on the Quarter were studied. Through Metro-Link,

partically staffed with Tulane Architecture students, persons who would not

normally have access to an architects services may obtain it, and students

hopefully acquire a better idea of problems facing the architect in the future.

Changes in the School of Architecture came about due to the inherent
nature of the subject, the size of the student body, the near total autonomy

the School has within the University system, and an overall willingness, if
not desire, on the part of the students and faculty to find and explore new
ideas and methods for solving the problems facing the architect. The
increased time students spend with each other and with professors is of
major importance in that it allows for a more intense and extensive
exchange of ideas than is found in the normal three day-a-week
lecture. The future of the Tulane School of Architecture, as well as any
educational institution, lies in the continuing exchange of ideas between
students and professors, and the School's ability as a formal structure to
remain philosophically open, allowing students and professors to project
into the future and react in a responsible manner to the demands placed on
them by their society.

The School of Architecture has made a conscientious effort to update the

structure of its curriculum relative to the current changes and needs of our

society. If the end product of a college education is to be an informed,

thinking individual, all schools within this University would do well to

undergo a similar periodic reevaluation.

PAGE 100 /

- KnoxTumlin

/ PAGE 101

PAGE 102 /

SMALL group of Tulane graduate students,

) in an effort to provide educational
alternatives in New Orleans, organized the New Orleans Free University.
The concept of providing information so that people couJd find new and
more suitable educational experiences was best put forth in the first
catalog:

"As schools and universities respond inflexibly and unimaginatively to
changing human needs, their unquestioned right to monopolize
education becomes increasingly untenable. Communication between
the growing numbers of those dissatisfied or alienated serves as
catalyst to unite isolated efforts and thereby create a new form and style
of education. The free school movement is an outgrowth of a new
culture seeking to release the individual's perception from unnecessary
constraints."

The Free University in the New Orleans area is a means of providing
information which will enable people of diverse interests and
backgrounds to interact creatively. Since course moderators are not
paid, the F.U. attracts people committed to the intrinsic rewards of the
learning process rather than to financial gain or status. All courses are
free and non-credit and anyone may participate as instructor and/or
student. Involvement in the F.U., whether teaching or learning, can
begin to penetrate communication barriers and to reorient attitudes
toward education.

The result of this effort so far has been the offering of courses ranging
from film making to anarchism to transcendental meditation, and the
involvement and interaction of students from all campuses in New
Orleans, heads from the Quarter, and others. More than 50 people
(though no Tulane faculty members) have taken the time to conduct
courses. Free University is thus one of the all too scarce ways that
Tulane extends itself as a true university should, even to those
dissatisfied with it.

— Ben Weathersby

/ PAGE 103

/VOC

4 —

mk'

ei>

'«^.

C«:i

((ii\4;'

^>s^

^'^r

0*^

*«' •

-p

■j

aSi

^i^U^^tf

id a

!:;V

>:^

4'u,

1- ,1

VUV,

\(M

i>.

-Of

e7<

'oo,

//,

rci.

-y/

ktl-

l^^>y^^NJ>^a\X■Tw^;>y^J;^J;^^J^

HOW LONG

Fraternities have found, as have American troop

commanders in Viet Nam, college administrators,

and frustrated parents, that young people are a lot

less willing to take orders without question than in

the past. More aware, more articulate, more

demanding than before, today's kids hesitate to

accept established mores and authority at face

value. They ask "why" and expect to be answered.

Inside they are growing and gaining an

appreciation of their own complexities. They are

reluctant to sacrifice their beings to the goals of a

technological society, which are unexplained, not

understood, often "plastic," and sometimes

worthless. "Do your own thing" is the publically

proclaimed method for developing the total

personality and achieving a realization of self. Those

who prohibit the implementation of this principle risk

rejection by the youth culture.

The modern mood is anti-organizational because

kids want individual freedom to create their own

styles. But they are unsure of which direction to take.

A few years ago, when conformity was not only

acceptable, but necessary for social survival,

security was available at a very small intellectual

cost. In addition to a specified wardrobe, guaranteed

to impress everyone on campus, fraternity men were

provided with enough prestige and good times to

make four years at college relatively painless.

This is no longer adequate for today's more

serious and thought-probing students. They have

found the traditional kibitzing and hell-raising a poor

substitute for the meaning they are seeking.

Sensitive to criticisms that they are "irrelevant,"

fraternities are finding it necessary to adapt

themselves to the changing tones. Aware of the

antagonism towards stereotypes, the organizations

are playing up individualism to attract new members

and have become more tolerant of differences. They

are trying to convince people that group

participation does not necessarily mean a loss of

identity.

The stringent enforcement of norms and mores in

the House has dissipated because the whole thing is

more "open" now. The House is requiring less of a

total personality involvement, instead of the with-us-

or-against-us attitude. The hard knocks caused by

deactivation and loss of pledges last year made

some fraternities realize the need for change.

Clearly the biggest problem facing the frats is the

change in attitude of freshmen. Aside from being

more inclined towards academics than in the past,

freshmen are much more independent than before.

They want to find out who they are without somebody

telling, and they seem not to need the fraternity as an

organization.

The mass media have had much to do with the

awareness of young people, causing them to "grow

up faster." Viewing the campus as an outlet for

political expression, some incoming freshmen are

questioning the purpose of an organization like the

fraternity. People are scrutinizing the

fraternities — questioning the system, and needing to

be convinced. There are fewer people being

shepherded in. However, more of those who came

through rush were commitied to joining and not just

enjoying the parties. They were looking harder.

Some freshmen who have joined fraternities have

made themselves heard. The freshmen of one

fraternity last year were responsible for a change in

the master-pledge relationship. By this year, all the

fraternities have revamped their pledge programs to

accommodate the changing youth. As one fraternity's

rush chairman put it, "The pledges are a little

smarter now. They know more about the world than

they used to, and we can't tell them what to do.

That's why we have to be more reasonable with

them."

Apparently, the days when the pledges had to fetch

PAGE 106 /

WILL THEY BE ABLE TO STAY?

matches, wash cars, do push-ups. and bounce balls
on the end of their noses, are coming to a close. The
trend is definitely away from the old hazing and
personal servitude practices. The reason is
simple — freshmen refuse to take it anymore.

Now, in many cases, the pledge period is limited to
approximately six weeks, after which time the
individual becomes an associate member. During
this stage, unlike before, he is permitted to attend
the meetings and have a voice. Some organizations
permit their pledges to vote.

There was no big snow-job attempt on the part of

fraternities this year during rush. A more informal.
person-to-person, less expensive rush took place.
instead of the orientation marathons of the past. The
"hard sell" was abandoned in favor of something
more casual and leisurely. Fraternities didn't go to
the dorms to drag rushees out.

Previously, the pledge training was used to fulfill
the somewhat sadistic needs of the active members.
It is now aimed at the needs of the pledge, with the
emphasis on the success experience, rather than
failure. Where before antagonism was employed to
unify the pledges as a class, new members are now
integrated into the chapter as indiiduals.

The biggest change has been from the concept of
"pledges until they prove themselves" to the concept
of an individual within the fraternity to be educated
in the workings of the structure. Indeed, several of
the groups seem to be following this method.

In spite of these efforts, rush this year has not
been as successful as in the past. The number of
pledges this year reaches at least 300. whereas last
year's total was over 100 people higher. These

/ PAGE 107

figures are somewhat misleading in that the present
policy of open rush permits fraternities to take new
members all year. What's more, though there have
been various rumors circulating that said fraternities
are on the decline, several organizations reported
that they have more pledges in their organizations
than before.

Some individuals pointed to the anti-fraternity
literature that bombards freshmen as soon as they
arrive on campus. The Hullabaloo, with its traditional
editorial stand against the Greek system, was not
popular among them. Another indicated that the
inflationary tendencies in the National economy have
affected the financial ability of people to join. The
fraternity is a business organization too, and must
have capital in order to run. At the same time, some
point out, there was a definite reluctance on the part
of actives last year to cough up the fees. The actives
didn't feel they were getting enough out of it.

There is some concern that, with fraternities losing
their grip on the campus, they may disappear
completely within a matter of years. Most fraternity
members believe that fraternities will last quite a
while longer, though perhaps, not in their present
form. In fact, most of the organizations seem to be
getting away from the formality and ritual. There is
less emphasis on fraternity structure; some don't
bother with meetings.

One fraternity representative had some interesting
comments to make about fraternities, aside from the
point that he is against them. Students have gone
through the social aspect in high school, and are
now looking for something more, he explained. "You
have to broaden the scope to keep them interested.
The University should come first, and the fraternity,
second. If the fraternity is going to be useful, it has to
give something to the University, it has to start
getting involved. The fraternity has been happy to be
isolated, but it was always taking away."

PAGE 108 /

It seems that now, a few fraternities are interested

in taking the ideas of their individuals and turning

them outside to deal with the more meaningful

problems of today. Furthermore, these fraternities

feel that they could fulfill some important roles that

the University should be, but isn't, taking on, like

academic counseling, particularly in regard to class

selection.

Not all fraternity men feel that their organizations

should have a deeper role in the University and

society as a whole. Many believe that the fraternity's

sole purpose is that of a social unit. Furthermore, the

frats don't seem to be as progressive as all their

stress on individualism and social awareness would

indicate. There is some evidence of the traditional

pranks like overturning Volkswagens, and customs

like answering the phone Army-style, "This is pledge

so-and-so. . ."

But the image of fraternities has been somewhat

updated as they all have their share of long-haired

people who wear bell-bottoms and peace symbols.

"In frats," as one such person says, "if you used to

use drugs, you were a freak; now, if you don't, you're

a freak."

Fraternities can hardly be considered revolutionary

with their acceptance of hairy people and trippers.

since these are symbols of the modern age. In fact.

it is clear that fraternities are struggling to keep up

with the contemporary trends, rather than initiating

any. It is difficult to measure how far fraternities have

come from the old stereotype. What is most evident

perhaps, is that there exists an understanding that to

survive, they are going to have to adapt. Clearly,

there are traces of the old image around.

The interesting question is. "How long will they be able

to stay?"

— Cindy Stevens

Newcomb 71

/ PAGE 109

Has the white-gloved image of
sorority rush gotten slightly dirty?
Has all the hand clapping become off-
beat and the songs a little out of
tune? Some people seem to think so.
When rushees and actives wonder if
it's real and pray for the day the
whole affair will be over, it's time for a
change. Their radical heritage is
creeping out of the mothballs and,
thank God, things are really
changing. From faces and family to
personality and intellect; from
homogeneous milkshake
organizations towards a diversified
hodgepodge, the bonds of the
goldfish swallowing days
are fading into oblivion
and the reincarnation of
individualism is here.

Individualism that requires a rush

geared to the selection of members

for what they are, not who they know.

A rush that says "this is what we've

got and are offering you" instead of

one that announces that "this is what

we are and you will become." The

focus of rush has shifted from clothes

to the person, from "she's just so

sweet" to intelligence, talent, abilities

and interests.

Times have changed and people

are concerned with finding out who

they really are. The existence of

sororities hinges on their part in

helping to answer this question. It is

to this role that the "new rush" is and

has to be oriented. The modern

version of rush must stress the

freedom for growth in a sorority — that

everyone doesn't hold their cigarette

the same way or cross their legs in

the identical fashion; that sororities

want and need people who are

different, who do question and

sincerely want to find answers.

Without this vitality, without these

people who question, how can

sororities ever find out what is real?

Something new had to be created,
something that would put across this

^w"-«' J^IJJJI.

t Ml good '^*' "- KKr ,.

J^mmm?-

h UV.''A

L Algoodg-*

^^H

"•»^

necessity for vitality. And so a
new method of rusii was born — one winere tine
emphasis is based on the individual, centered on
finding out what makes a rushee tick, what does she
have to offer the sorority and what can the sorority
offer her. With birth came death — death to a great
deal of trivia, a great deal of the superficial, the
insignificant. Instead of the songs, skits and
conversation have become centered around what the
sorority has to offer, what it is and can be, why it is
real.

And so a metamorphosis has occurred. The
cocoon that has encircled sororities and rush for so
many years is beginning to crumble. What will
emerge, only time will tell. Its form is beginning to
appear, its wings are starting to break free from the
bonds of the old lifeless cocoon. The change has
occurred, but whether a butterfly or a moth emerges
remains to be seen.

— Karen Lautz

Newcomb 73

PAGE 112 /

..■SSrtri

LJ^^r;

'I'i^

i f^-.

BY HAROLD SYLVESTER

It took a long time for Black people to realize

that to actualize themselves was not to

acculturate to White society. 400 long hard

years have passed and finally we Black

people can see ourselves through the

camouflage of American Society.

We are different. Our Black skins and

empty pockets set us apart from other

Americans. Black people are not a part of the

same apocalyptic intrigue that propels the

world from one war to the next, from suicidal

death to suicidal death. We have our own

cause.

■ <r*<r

/ PACE 115

Black people at Tulane, as Is evident by

the chosen seclusion of the Afro-American

Congress, struggle as do brothers and sisters

all over the world to build our own empires.

Resegregation? A sick word but call it what

you will. Realize though that it is necessary in

order for us to establish an identity strong

enough to break the symbiosis that we have

had with white society for much too long. We

have been playing pseudo-masochistic

games with each other for too long. What we

want to do is stop the game, but if we can't,

then we'll just have to reverse the order.

Being separate from the rest of society is

nothing new for Black folks. We have been

that way all along. The difference now is that

we have chosen this way ourselves. We have

PAGE 116 /

<^v,<

a new awareness of the fact tfiat the rest of
society is just not that pretty. We have had a '
good thing going for us for a long time. Blacl<
society is poetic. It is beautiful and dramatic.
What we learn in a society is both good and
bad. We sift through the mess and try to
grasp what is good.

Black people know two worlds and their
preference is obvious. Also it is obvious that
we are living in a real world where all of the
different groups have to compromise or
destroy each other. We are not bent on ■'

destruction so we must compromise. Our
compromise will no longer cause us an
expense, for we have an Identity.

We know who we are.

/ PAGE 117

W^J^^

S chita^rS,'^,;;^;^;-/.^-, , ,ost ny West
looked like What a 0X0! ^ '"^° ^^^ ^^'"s. Tulane
compared to the La Sn^ T^ supposed to, "^

oame. My educatforwas k' n'' '''°'^ ^^«^<^- '
exotement. The F?ee Soepnh '^ "'^' ^"^ ' ^^^^ '-^
been heard at Tulane bufT r°'^^^"t had not yet
orth With beer and good rock an^^'/^ "'^^ ^'^^^^
tactics class at the arTdo^ "^ '°"- ' 'eft the
we were in Vietnam 'St ^.f"' 1°:^°^ ^^^^^ ^hy
classmates, along wihou^lr"'^'^^ *° '^^
surpass the '67 cls ' Smce thatT"°T:"^°'^^ ^^^H
to a greater understanri^ . i^^ *"^e I have come
^otto. My Class was the one°L'°J' ''' ^^^ ^"^ th?
casualties in the war Bun wl f * ^'^ '" *^^^s of
eden, clothed with a lis ' '^^^ '" -^^ S^rden of

The first time I r-arr,^ ■ ^

administra^on Sr tn'" ?.°"*^^* ^1*^ the

-as over th'i'is'e'oVa fratern^''^ *'<=^^* ^-^au.

resulted in the imposition nf^ ^^'^^ ^^ich

probation for my chamer ^ h^ °."^ ^^^^ ^°cial

"ext year by a total sSpens ion' T" '°"°^^d *he

repeat of the "DebuSp ^"f ^""''"'"''^^ for a

fhe underground, andT^as fun ""' '"'' ''''' °f

SL^;rsrp:rdTs£ T

paranoia began to build With tL'^l^"^' ^^^ the
hassle students off campu^ anHlH^"'* beginning to
use of mind effecting intoxicant. ^ ^'"^^^ °f ^he
ghetto began to gesta e Fnn °" campus, the
censorship of the aHeTed 'ih?'"^ *'^" ^P'^°^e of
P^o-graphs, the ann^afsp^^nr^:- ^^^^^^^^^^^

PAGE II 18 /

•Ui

/ PAGE 119

•,"«! I-

«^**1

V'^i

:*^

^■■■^ *he ACT Vibrations

faculty committee. The on y p An^erican univers ty

■ ,..>on which triggered ^^e Am ^^^^^ us

handled poorly, and the ^^^^ ^^^ commemo-

bomb was qiuhp

^. ^.^^^^

PAGE 120 /

/ PAGE 121

The

Tulane 'Jock'

Circa 1971

by Joel
Henderson

PAGE 122 /

Situation; Jim the Jock meets Walter the Whimp on
the sidewalks of McAlister. Immediately a stereotype
is formulated in the mind of each party. Walter the
Whimp makes the assumption that Jim the Jock,
along with his short hair, white socks, forty-four inch
chest, and Tulane T-shirt, represents the lowest of
Darwin's evolutionary forms. This assumption is due
primarily to the concept that every Jock, the student
athlete, is enrolled in the University College physical
education program. The above concept is. however,
more myth than reality.

In 1952, the University administrators decided to
abolish the physical education major due to
excessive expenditures by the Department of
Athletics. With the abolition of the physical education
major, Tulane began to fall to the lower rungs of the
tough Southeastern Conference ladder. As the loyal
supporters of Tulane football looked for a means of
rebuilding Tulane as a football power, all roads
seemed to lead to the reinstatement of the physical
education major, in hopes of recruiting better
athletes. The groups debating the issue were
divided, it seems, into those who thought that a
physical education program would be Tulane's
"savior, " and those who viewed a physical education
program as disgraceful to the academic standards of
their institution.

The University Self Study, completed in the summer
of 1968. stated that "the immediate goal of the
athletic program is to raise itself to a point of
excellence that is compatible with the academic
reputation of the University." Statistics prove that the
reinstatement of the physical education major in
1968, under the auspices of the University College,
was neither the "savior" of Tulane football, nor a
disgrace to the University academically.

The question arises as to whether or not the success
of Tulane football in 1970 was a direct result of the
physical education major. A glance at the academic
files of those men who made "1970: Year of the
Green" a reality will answer the question. The 1970
Tulane Varsity Football team included some 85
student athletes with only 25 percent of the varsity
team enrolled in the University College program, and
53 percent enrolled m the College of Arts and
Sciences. The remaining 22 percent were enrolled in
the School of Engineermg.

Varsity football was not the only sport in which the
physical education major represented a minority. In
the minor sports — golf, swimming, tennis, and
track — there are no men on athletic scholarships
enrolled in the University College. Of those not on
scholarship, only one in 20 is a phys.-ed. major. In
the other two major sports, baseball and basketball,
similar statistics can be found. Of those athletes
playing baseball on scholarship, only three of 17 are
enrolled in the University College. Only two out of 16
basketball players on scholarship are currently
majoring in physical education.

/ PAGE 123

The student athlete at Tulane seems to have
been attracted to Tulane, not out of aspiration
for a professional career, but primarily for the
chance to receive a first-rate academic
education in one of the University's fields of
study. Athletes, upon arriving at Tulane, are not
so naive as to believe that their sole purpose
here lies in the achievement of an athletic
career. Instead, the athlete, just as the non-
athlete, seeks first to receive a formal
education.

Often the athlete perceives his role in the
manner of the student who works his way
through school via a part time job. A
scholarship is not merely a gift; it encompasses
many hours of fatiguing physical and mental
work. Those athletes who truly wish to dedicate
themselves to career work in the physical
education field make use of the physical
education program to achieve their goal. It is
only right that such an institution as Tulane
should offer these athletes this opportunity. The
physical education major program is not a
method for recruiting the less intelligent student
athlete. Granted, there are those athletes who
wish to study only physical education, but it is
not true that physical education, in some form
or fashion, is of interest to the majority in
America's society?

Finally, as our athletic department shifts gear
and moves into "1971, the Year of the Green
Plus One," it must be stated that the return of
the physical education major at Tulane
University was not responsible for the success
of Tulane football in 1970. Those who believe
that the student athlete at Tulane is a
detrimental academic figure are neither rational
nor realistic. The reinstatement of the program
at Tulane has not proven to be an academic
handicap. Instead it seems that an element of
pride might exist in the fact that a University
which offers a physical education program, only
about 25 percent of the athletes choose to take
advantage of it. The remaining 75 percent of the
student athletes are enrolled in the other
academic fields of study.

The crux of the reinstatement controversy,
however, seems to lie not in academics, but
rather in finance. For the first time in many
years, Tulane has tasted success on the
gridiron, and has caught the whiff of post-
season television revenues and gate receipts.
There is little reason why this success cannot
be continued. The nationwide telecast of the
1970 Liberty Bowl was a giant stride in elevating
athletics to a level of quality compatible with the
general "academic reputation" of the
University. This stride was not accomplished by
athletes per se, but by student athletes, with
academic, as well as athletic pride.

PAGE 124 /

/ PAGE 125

RELIGION

HOC

Like many traditions, the close bond between reli-
gion and man seems to be breaking. Religion has
lost a great deal of its centrality and sacredness
in campus life. The chaplains at Tulane, however,
are attempting to recapture and revitalize this the-
ological intimacy through their interdominational
spirit.

Their endeavor is to spread this fellowship
among the students, faculty and community by
different activities. The religious centers have
many levels of operation, some more manifest than
others, which have as their central purpose the
spiritual well-being of people on this campus. As
one chaplain explained, "We do things in answer
to needs as they arise, more on an ad hoc basis
than on some kind of standing committee basis."
Since the Chaplains realize that students often feel
a sense of void and emptiness, they hope that the
services provide a sense of belonging and a feel-
ing of being accepted. Many centers are attempt-
ing to speak to the emotional and intellectual life
of the students in the University in that the services
are informal and direct.

Saturday or Sunday worship is not all that the
Chaplains have to offer, in cooperation with the
health services on campus, the centers provide
counseling for their own denominations as well
as counseling on a non-denominational basis in
the new Chaplains Counseling Center in the
basement of Warren.

Other events consist of regularly scheduled
suppers open to campus students, and a variety
of speaker and lecture programs. Besides these,
the Chaplains offer seminar courses on contem-
porary theologians and also on historical ap-
proaches to the Old Testament. In connection with
these courses, one chaplain said that, "A student
might choose to accept his faith or reject it. but
at least he wont be ignorant of it." There is a
profound need to be Intellectually aware of religion
in shaping our culture, as well as in the misshap-
ing of it. independent of whether or not people
"practice their faith."

—Diane Burnside

— Newcomb '71

/ PAGE 127

>'«^J

•-*;

ODE TO A NEWCOMB GIRL:

We'll sing you the story

Of Harriet Sophie

Who diediat l^in her bed

The grass grajt above her

There's no on^to love her

Now that she's buried an* dead.

«
\^. Sophie i;°« told «

WSs pure as gold ■

<6he was alMrairs innocent and gay
And Ihfn orfh nigli '
Out ofpure'Wespile
She met Pafel Tulane att4 away.

Now Paui he tallied sweet
Swept her right olther (eet ^

IHer head w^an innocent maze
Though J.L^^d taught her
That she h^n't ought er
*Poor Harriet SOphle got laid.

Paul gave her his kisses

If shed be his missus

Would love her4o eternity

But when came the dawn ,

Paul Tulane was gone

Reaving Sophie heartbroke with v.d.

One thing we're neglecting
P^or Sophie was expecting
Tbeie wasn't a thing to be done

the coujdn't have marriag#
<j.she had ■ miscarriage
Instead of a t^st^ son.

H. Sophie was weak
But she just had to speak
To J.L. this dying retrain
Build a house for bthers
The unmjrriad Inothers " ■
Caught in the wilds al Tul8he.

Now there is thy stogr •

OfHarriet Sophie

Her fnemory shines like a pearl

Let's follow tradition .

AAd carry oLi her mission

For we are the Newcomb girls.

—Anonymous

I'd grown too old for small towns
and too young for tired people. With one
trunk of jeans and another of dresses

I came, I saw, and I put on my
jeans.

But then again everyone wore
jeans — old jeans, new jeans, and jeans
sans sorority pins. I had to wear my own
kind of jeans though.

No one else's fit right.

I met the people behind the jeans
and the ideas behind the people. The
people change, their ideas change
Them — time — and 1.

— Myra Zilahy

Newcomb '74

PAGE 130 /

The Newcomb girl is now in as much a state of
change as is the school itself. Three years ago, my
freshmen year, the campus population seemed to be
a very homogenous group. With the exception of a
small minority of students, the kids on campus gave
the impression of a blend of basically unconcerned
nothingness. In the past years, however, a new trend
has developed; the oblivious attitude which
dominated the campus earlier is more and more
being replaced by a feeling of engagement. Factions
have emerged. And although you probably disagree
with a lot of ideas floating around here, you must at
least respect the fact that people are coming forth
with any ideas at all. This is just one symptom of a
larger momentum.

This same shift has come about in the "Newcomb
image." The prim, proper, "Southern women's
college" ideal has wallowed in its own vacuum long
enough. And fortunately, a large percentage of the
females here have begun to realize this and to do
something about it. It's not that all the girls are
running around getting "involved" and setting up
women's lib clubs; the "qroupies" were here before,

and I'm sure that they'll be around for a long time to
come. It's more than that — more subtle. For the
change that has occurred in the "Newcomb image"
is a change from something that was so present and
so obvious that it was almost tangible to something
that exists so deeply in the girl that it is not readily
perceived to be an image.

For the "image" of the Newcomb girl today is a
"personal" image, an image that adapts itself to the
individual. And the main characteristic of this
"image" is the very opposite of what the term
"image" connotes. This is FLEXIBILITY. The
Newcomb girl no longer acts only through the
dictation of the rigid ideal which is deemed "proper"
to the Southern tradition. She has learned to respond
according to what she feels and has created a more
relaxed atmosphere for herself.

Sure, there's still a 'Newcomb image." but it's a
different image, a more subtle image, a nicer image.

Jane Zimmerman

Newcomb '71

/ PAGE 131

.h,
like

/0L4»« > • • I 1 0U>

The Newcomb image is sometimes lost amidst

relished ideas of Southern chivalry, beautiful belles,

and conventional stereotyping of the typical college

coed. A woman attending Newcomb however, is

neither, although she clings, at times, to the first, and

usually abhors the second. Her location, style of life,

and educational surroundings mold her into a unique

species of coed.

As a Black freshman at Newcomb. I find that the

problems and pleasures are numerous. In the end,

they balance out, and right now, I enjoy attending

Newcomb. Contrary to popular belief, the Newcomb

student is not as studious as she first appears,

although at times (especially before exams) there is

a furious flurry of study. The biggest flurry however,

takes place on the week-end, for this is when the

typical Newcomb woman is at her best — "date

nights." In one respect, she is no different than her

fellow college women across the nation — she likes

men, and is definitely man-hunting. The fact that I'm

Black would work as a handicap if I allowed it — there

aren't that many Black men here; and inter-racial

dating has not yet captured my heart. Heaven forbid I

should ever attempt to snatch a prospective mate

from one of my fellow classmates.

Of the two most important items to a Newcomb

woman, the second one must be appearance. It is

only logical. How can one hunt, if one is not dressed

properly? At this point, there is quite a show of

individualism. The "typical" Newcomb student may

be a pseudo-Freak; a jeans girl (that's me), or a real

dresser. To label one or the other as the typical

Newcomb image would be presumptious.

Regretfully, I find that interest in affairs

surrounding their lives ranks third among my fellow

"Newcomb-ites." If the reaction to a situation isn't

apathy, the interest shown is usually close to

patronizing boredom. The possibilities for

involvement are manifold for the average student, yet

on the whole, she chooses to ignore them.

That is what it's been like to attend Newcomb so far.

Perhaps some will call this an unfair interpretation,

but it is what a close look at Newcomb women has

revealed to me. Happily enough, we black women are

about as studious, are not losing our minds over

men, and do care what happens around us.

Newcomb women, we leave you Women's Lib.

Independently Variable Newcombness. Come to

Newcomb only to face Sorority Rush and peer

pressure to pledge. For what or why matters little in

the Stream of things. The Stream of Newcombness is

a reflection of self and defies the use of "image" in a

mass mirror sense.

The "Newcomb Girl" is self-professed dilettante; a
currently unmarketable figure who hassels with self-
identification, and with the futures game. She is
variably vulnerable, easily influenced, and ultimately,
defensive. By the nature of her education, she is
master of no trade, and must look to other
involvement for self-fulfillment. She is willing to try
anything once, if pushed, and tends to
dabble . . . with Community Involvement; with
Campus Politics; with Personal Affairs and
Introspection; even with majors and minors. Quite
often she doesn't find her niche until Newcomb is far
behind. Yet the independently variable
Newcombness goes with her.

— Marian Shostrom

Newcomb '71

PAGE 132 /

— Candy Capel

Newcomb '74

Go to the Head of the Class: A Game

Number of players: quantity rather than

quality: increasing annually
Age Range: tall enough to reach the

admissions table
Aim of the game: To sustain the four years

without the need to visit Dr. Seastrunk or

the need for a brief interlude in New

York.
Preparation for play: braces, contact lenses,

nose fixing, charm school, and a well

worn copy of Sex and the Single Girl
Rules of the game: Rules are so universally

disregarded that you need only be

concerned with them if you are stupid

enough to get caught and be made an

example of.
How to play: Stay stoned so as to be

unaffected by the stimulating Sophie

Newcomb scene.
Caution: Forfeit all points earned if God

forbid you lack a date on Saturday night.
Bonus: Add 20 points for the regular usage of

"far out".

— Cissy Pass

Newcomb 73

How a "Newcomb image" evolved, with no
accompaniment of an "A & S image" or an
"Architecture image," is another fragment from
Newcomb's mysterious past. The Newcomb image is
at least no monolithic picture, however distasteful
the various segments of the image are: the finishing
school sorority debutante: the bronzed Floridian or
Texan sunbathers of Butler quad; the rich art
student; the copious note-taker with a 4.0 who
memorizes homogenized notes without considering
their implications.

But the Villager days are gone. And I rejoice. I am
tired of unfair stereo-types. While they do seem to
apply to some Newcomb students, we should all be
nauseated at the audacity of those members of the
community who seek to perpetuate them.

The question must be asked however, are we
nauseated? do we accept these descriptions of us?
Most of all, do we Newcomb students ourselves
perpetuate them?

We are not fighting against the images, we do indeed
prolong them. And the images appear to be changing
to other equally disgusting ones. It is possible, for
example, that the Newcomb technical virgin has
changed from the feminine equivalent of Joe College
to a Joe Hippie. The archaic syndrome of sorority-
girl-turned-neo-freak is banal. It is time to repudiate
both categories of sorority-sweet girl and no-bra-
dope-smoking chick. Our individuality is confined
into enclaves we did not seek and do not deserve,
yet seem to want.

Which brings us to another question: Structurally
speaking, where are we positing an identity? Are we
Newcomb students, members of Tulane-at-large.
residents of New Orleans community? Yes. we are all
three, and more, but in what order, what priority?
What are our responsibilities to each and to
ourselves?

You see. very few of us really think about it. Very few
of us would allow conflicts between the three parts of
the Venn diagram. The problem as to how we define
ourselves — not just ourselves qua ourselves, not
merely ourselves per se — but within this rubric, this
context, is preeminent.

And partly because we do not define our position, we
are more easily subject to impositions by other
people. Unless a Newcomb student makes deliberate
moves against it. and often even when she has, she is
typed within quotation marks, becomes a proverbial
Newcomb Bitch, and is other-defined. It is time for us
to stop letting our lives be measured out
in coffee spoons: it is time for a Newcomb
student to be self-defined.

— Louisa Rogers

Newcomb 73

/ PAGE 133

uow- like h>

A Recapitulation

An artful snare, and the chauvinist Jamb editor

chuckles behind his blueprints. Our thoughtful little

essays vilify the old visage, reinforce the new,

proclaim widened horizons, changing awareness,

and a better "typical Newcomb girl". Yet we have

failed to grasp the primary annoyance — being

tricked into defending ourselves at all. Our vocal

patchwork inadvertently admits that (1.) there is

indeed a "Newcomb image" and (2.) that the

"Newcomb image" is (or was) true. And however

thoroughly we repudiate a stereotype, we have

simply sewn one more tightly to our backs.

It is hardly the time for self-defense. The only
"Newcomb image" at Tulane was spawned by
men — not women, and is the function of male ego,
not female ineptitude. The Newcomb girl is a
"Newcomb dog" — studious, plump, bespectacled,
and unattractive — when Tulane can do without her
(generally early freshman year while the high-school-
stud halo lingers and male pride remains delicately
intact.) She is suddenly a "Newcomb bitch" — gold
digging, spoiled, conceited, cold — when Tulane's
lopsided genital ratio becomes apparent and it is
damned hard to get a date with her. In neither case is

she labeled fairly.

Nor does the usual male grumbling produce sound

advice. The Newcomb girl is simultaneously (A.) a

lusty manhunter playing the future game; (B.) a

haughty, frigid, don't-touch-me chick with a virgin

complex; (0.) a sloppy dope-smoking freak; (D.) a

prim white-gloved slice of sorority row; (E.) a

useless, unmarketable dabbler in experimental

psych, Nicolas Berdyaev, and the population

explosion; and (F.) an all-too-dedicated Women's

Lib-er prefering careers to babies, adventurous

creativity to cleaning the toilet. The complaints are

clearly incoherent; the complainants superficial,

sanctimonius — even whiney.

It is curious indeed that no "A & S image"
accompanies the supposedly tangible Newcomb
one. Turnabout is fair play and defining A & S (or any
other college at Tulane) would amuse us. But
perhaps Newcomb girls don't choose to deal in
stereotypes. Perhaps we see our male counterparts
as separate human beings — fluid, indefinable, many-
sided. Perhaps over-simplification disgusts us; we
relate to personalities, not formulas, and our vision of
mankind — even Tulane mankind — is
expansive. ... In seething summation, a
mature appraisal of the "Newcomb image" should
cast doubt on you thimbleheads applying the term.
Are you insulating yourselves? Sanctioning a retreat
from the Newcomb girl? If you really knew who we
were, you wouldn't be fingering our image\

— Martha Harris

Newcomb '70

PAGE 1S4 /

THE 1970 HOMECOMING COURT

^.i_«j^^ ;■ : ■»«;

PAGE 136 /

AND THE BEAST

EDITOR'S JOURNAL

Anti Sexist (?) Homecoming

It all started at a party m Ben
Smith's back yard. Collins
Vallee said to me. "You know,
about the most sexist thing
around that school is the beauty
contests," I said. "Yeah." He
said, "How about running a guy
for Homecoming Queen?"
We never thought that the
Alumni Relations Committee
would accept the nomination of
a male, but the HULLABALOO
and Student Senate submitted
nominations of two males each
anyway. Eventually, I crashed
a meeting of the committee and
got them to change the rules.
Collins Vallee, Paul Baxter,
Ralph Wafer, and a fourth can-
didate (who prefers to remain
anonymous) were all invited to
the selection tea held at Alumni
House. Ralph and Collins were
the only ones who showed, but
they had a nice time and were
given blue-and-green-striped
ties with the Tulane crest on
them. Needless to say, the
selection committee did not
approve our boys as nominees.
The next step was to get our
candidates before the public
eye, give them a chance for
recognition, and most impor-
tantly, COMBAT SEXISM. We
decided on a "guerilla booth," to
be set up next to the "real" elec-
tion booth. In the spirit of liber-
tarianism and free-thinking, we
also decided to let anyone who
wanted to be a candidate in our
election do it.

Someone ran out and recruited
some guys who were sitting
around in the Rathskeller, and
the show, as they say, went on.

^^^^^^^W by (Aargaret Blain

There was Collins with a flower
coming out of his fly; there was
Matt Anderson in my scarf, car-
rying a parasol, fluttering the
plastic Japanese fan Allen Gins-
berg gave me, and looking like a
mail-order bride from the prison
farm at Angola; there was Bob
Schwartz blowing bubbles with
his bubble gum (getting if all
over his moustache) and strad-
dling a large bamboo pole.
Eventually, there was Ken Opat.
Ken came in wearing yippie-
style (Uncle Sam) clothes.
Everyone kept saying that
someone (of the candidates)
should take off his pants for his
pictures. And lo and behold,
there was Ken Opat, dropping
trou.

The rest is history. Ken won,
primarily because he took off
his pants in front of the camera.
Now, I ask you, does that or
does it not prove that Tulane is a
sexist institution in a sexist
society?

When we put up the board with
the pictures {fine photography
by Bud Brimberg, Third Eye: art
work by Leon), we labelled it the
"Anti-Sexist Homecoming
Court." It was sexist. Its greatest
triumph was in actually being
just as sexist as the establish-
ment homecoming court (there
were no female candidates), and
in revealing to every liberated,
anti-sexist one of us that we are
just as sexist as the next guy
(even the cliches are
sexist . . .).

THE TULANE HULLABALLO
NOVEMBER. 1970

/ PAGE 137

Emily Barnes
& Lory Lockwood

^tfSJtfSna :■

Ji/«

Darlene Hildreth & Maria Davis

Judy Ross & Diane Burnside

Sunday
after

noon

FA'Gf

/ PAGE 141

Sunday afJternoon

/ PAGE 143

PAGE 144. /

sandanr afternoon

I PAGE 145

PAGE 146 /

Sunday afternoon

I PAGE 147

"POETS AND im WORDS

In October, the Fine Arts and the Lyceum

Committees initiated a new type of

program which was to be a three-day

poetry symposium entitled "Poets and

Their Words." Plans called for five

modern poets, Denise Levertov, Allan

Ginsberg, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, William

Everson, and Nikki Giovanni, to do

readings of their own works on Thursday,

Friday, and Saturday, October 19-21. On

Sunday afternoon, Tulane students and

faculty were to be given the opportunity

to read their original poetry.

However, the result was something new

and exciting. The symposium turned into

an academic festival. The Tulane

community responded to the program

with tremendous enthusiasm, and there

was an intellectual atmosphere which

developed throughout the community.

A great deal of the success of the

program must be attributed to the poets

themselves. With the exception of

Levertov and Giovanni, all arrived in New

Orleans earlier than expected. Everson

and Ginsberg were particularly

fascinated with the Tulane student body,

and were more than willing to attend

classes, parties, and discussions that

were planned for them by the two

committees.

The poets, though all diverse and

individualists in their work, generally fit

into the category of the radical eccentric

poet. As a result of pre-symposium

publicity of this fact, over 2000 people

participated in the program. On both

Thursday night (Levertov and Ginsberg

presentations) and Friday night

(Ferlinghetti readings) McAlister

Auditorium was sold out for the readings.

However, as a result of the Soul Bowl

held on Saturday afternoon, the audience

for Saturday night's readings was

considerably less in number. For those

who did have the opportunity to view

Saturday night's readings, many

considered the readings by Everson to be

the most intense and inspiring of all.

PAGE 148 /

/ PAGE 149

Following completion of the program,

many have examined the meaning of its

success. It seems as though the

enthusiastic support of the symposium is

an indication of the ability of Tulane to

accept innovative events.

Whereas this type of program is generally
considered commonplace in universities
throughout the West and Northeast, it is
relatively new to the South and especially
to Tulane. It is the hope that such a forum
can be accepted as a common happening
at Tulane throughout the years to come.

For those connected with the poetry

symposium, it was an unforgettable

experience. The intensity of the minds of

the poets left lasting impressions on

those persons in their company. The

informal atmosphere which prevailed

throughout enabled anyone interested to

reach a poet with questions. From open

interviews with Hullabaloo WTUL

reporters, to open-house parties at

students' apartments, to merely sitting on

the U. C. quad during the day, the entire

program was open and friendly.

It has finally been realized that programs
presented by University Center
Programming Board committees are for
the benefit of the students and faculty of
Tulane, and all measures must be taken
to insure more contact between the
programs and the University community

as a whole.

—Bill Boyer

A&S 73

iiA

/ PAGE 151

OCTOBER 24

PAGE 152 /

MOOM
rUUXNE STADIUM

/ PAGE 153

OCt 24

PAGE 154 /

Tulane may never have seen anything like it. Six
nationally knov\/n rock and soul music groups
performing one after another in the middle of Tulane
Stadium one Saturday afternoon in October.
Headlining the show/ . . . some of the biggest
names in Soul — James Brown, Ike and Tina Turner,
Isaac Hayes. In the stands, and then on the
field . . . tens of thousands of toe-tapping, swaying,
singing, dancing Orleanians. An incredible profusion
of colorful costumes . . . bright purple jump-suits,
gold net see-through shirts, huge flaring orange bell-
bottoms. There is no doubt that the staid old
University on St. Charles Avenue received at least a
small infusion of Soul that day.

/ PACE 155

OCT.

It was. of course, a disappointment that, because of
the huge cost of putting it on. the Soul Bowl did not
in the end raise any money for scholarships to
minority group and disadvantaged students — the
purpose for which it was conceived in the first place.

And even more disappointing to the student,
faculty, and administration organizers was the failure
of so many Tulane students and other local whites to
attend, though whether out of disapproval, fear, lack
of interest, or whatever it was hard to say.

The most heartening aspect of the day's events was
the large turnout by New Orleans' Black community:
maybe at least a small start toward closer ties
between campus and ghetto was made that day. And
that in itself seemed a strong argument in favor of
holding a second Soul Bowl next year, when (with
the benefits of one year's experience) a considerable
profit might well be made. But. in any event, there
was obvious satisfaction among many of the
hundreds of Tulanians who had worked to make the
show a reality. In view of their inexperience and the

difficulties they had faced, it was quite an
accomplishment for the event to have taken place

at all.

It is true that there were some lengthy delays
between some of the acts. And that the concessions
ran out halfway through the eight hours. But once
Junior Walker began blaring out the music from his
thunderous saxophone, once Tina Turner and the
Ikettes started shaking their fringes and wailing of
their hopeless loves, once Isaac Hayes doffed his
great fur cape and launched into his seemingly
endless soliloquy on "By the Time I Get to Phoenix."
once James Brown bounced up from a full split and
shouted "i Wanta Make You Scream," who cared
about minor troubles?

The day was warm and beautiful, the crowd was
enthusiastic, the music was infectious.

It was an occasion not soon to be forgot.

-Bruce Eggler

PAGE 158 /

You do know Agnew finished

college? I spend about 98°o of my

time today on college campuses for a reason, that
simple reason, you young folks in America, you're
probably the most morally honest, ethically
dedicated, committed group of young people ever
lived in the history of this country, bar

none We old fools have left you

youngsters a hell of mess to clean
up. . . ... Rockefeller spent 8 million dollars

so he could run for Governor, again! For 8 million
dollars. Hell, I could run for God . . . and

win! We can not solve our problems

confronting America today with political muscle. It
has to be statesmanship ability Forty-
four million Americans go to bed every night hungry.
hmmm. Law and Order? Law and Order.
hmmm. , .

/ PAGE 159

PAGE 160 /

. . . Looks like it's going to be
another depression. Sure is. Niggers never got out ot

the first one I was so damn glad Nixon

got elected . . . black folk knew for the first time
that we didn't have a friend, that we'd have to get it
ourselves. . . ... Only Dick Nixon could take

the riots out of the black ghettos and into the white
suburbs. White kids runnin' down the streets with
signs, "Get Whitey". . . ... Respect the

police? If the cop that patrols your community, was
the heathen that you sent to patrol my community,
you would only not respect him, but you would have
wiped his ass out a long time ago. . . ... I lived

in the black ghetto. At five years old, I knew what the
whore looked like. At five years old, I knew what the
pimp looked like. At five years old, I knew what the
hustler, the bookie, and the dope pusher looked like.
I just can't believe that at five years old I was that
much smarter than the police. . . ... Treat a

man like a pig, he'll onk. . . ... Dick Nixon is a

home-grown American boy Understand

repression. Repression is more detrimental to the
oppressor than the oppressed. . . ... Ask five

year old kids in the ghetto to draw a picture of

himself, he draws an animal The

cowboy has one fringe benefit, when he gets him a
nigger or an Indian, and that fringe benefit is simple:
all Indians and all niggers look
alike. . .

. . . Only prejudice . riots,
hunger, — America — , could cause a comedian to
become an enraged, philosophical reactionary.

Phillipa Anderson

Newcomb '73

/ PACE 161

gBOARD

The University Center Board, comprised of four officers
and the chairmen of the eight programming committees,
is the arm of the Student Senate responsible for
providing extra-curricular entertainment and educational
events for the Tulane community. Due to the
cosmopolitan nature of the campus, the great variety of
taste, personality, and age, and to some extent the
apathy of members of the University community, it is
difficult to program to the approval of everyone.

The Board is a student-run organization. Participation in
the Program at all levels, from committee membership to
being on the Board itself, is open to all students, and
only students, on a voluntary basis. Each of the eight
committees is responsible for programming a specific
interest area and determining the type of events desired.
The success of a committee's programming depends
upon the input value of each committee member: his
awareness of the desires of his fellow students, his
knowledge of the field served by the committee, and his
willingness to work and carry out the program. The
results can be seen in wide range of programs offered
this year: the Poetry Symposium, free flicks, Buffalo Bob,
Latin American Week, TGIFs, the Bridal Fair, and
numerous art exhibits.

PAGE 162 /

/ PAGE 163

Due to inflation, however, tlie financing of programs has
been a big problem for the chairmen. The rental cost of
films alone has tripled over the past two years, big name
entertainers demand $10,000 to 15,000 per performance,
and even the price of beer has increased, limiting the
number of free TGIFs. This has made it necessary for the
Board to request a larger budget each year just to
maintain programming variety and quality from the
previous year.

The increased activities fee, voted into effect second
semester, lightened the financial restraints allowing
Spotlighters to bring the New Seekers, Lauro Nyro, and
Jeremy Storch; Lagniappes to co-host the Iron Butterfly
with Loyola, bring higher-quality bands for the spring
dances; and Fine Arts to sponsor three performances by
the National Shakespeare Company.

Such financial responsibilities require justification of per

capita expense in determining the size and nature of
each program. For example, Spotlighters committee
must face the question of spending $10,000 for a concert
in McAlister which will be attended by 1500 Tulane
students (or fewer), or using the funds instead for weekly
TGIFs and entertainment in the Rat, which during the
year would reach more people. Lyceum must decide
whether they will bring three major speakers of general
interest, or many special interest speakers for smaller
groups. This year, concentration has been centered on
the big name entertainment and speakers, helping to
build the image of the Board, and interest in the
committees, but efforts also have been made to improve
the quality and number of other events, such as Open
Stage in the Rat, Lyceum's backing to bring the authors
of TUT's spring productions, and Recreation's speaker
on mountaineering. In addition to this, if a certain group
of students feel that their needs are not being filled by
one of the existing committees, they may petition to

PAGE 164 /

become a Programming Affiliate of the Board and
receive financial underwriting for the program which
they plan. There have been two Programming Affiliates
this year: one group produced the play, Anything for a
Rush, and the Mexican-American Student Association
received financial backing for its programs.

This spring, the Board rewrote its constitution and by-
laws to allow more flexibility within the structure. Two
new committees were created, Cinema and Travel. Other
committees such as Hospitality and Cosmopolitan were
redefined, allowing broader fields in which to operate.

Some students complain that the University Center Board
is a closed-minded, bureaucratic, self-perpetuating
organization which takes a large "chunk" of the
student activities fee, without yielding a proportionate
amount of entertainment. This may have been true in the

past, but the Board has changed and evolved with the
new trends of student life and thought. If a student has
complaints about the programs being offered, it is not the
total fault of the Board, but also the fault of the student
who refuses to offer his complaints in a constructive
way, by taking advantage of this open, student-con-
trolled system, and working to implement his desired
changes, either from within through the committees, or
from without through Programming Affiliate status.
Hopefully, more students will take advantage of the
experience provided by such participation and decision
making by cooperating and working with fellow students
to achieve a certain goal — the success of a committee in
providing entertaining and/or educational activities for
fellow members of the student body.

— Sharon Carrigan

Newcomb '71

I PAGE 165

media

PAGE 166 /

/ PAGE 167

KEVIN ALLAIN / 1

RONALD NIERMAN / 2

MITCH BARBER / 3

LEE WILKIRSON / 4

TONY LANASA / 5

TOM IRELAND / 6

MIKE SIMPSON / 7

RICKSTREIFFER / 8

ALAN LOEB / 9

PAT SCHUSTER / 10

PAUL BAXTER / 11

JUDYMOFFIT / 12

L.M. BLAIN / 13

LINDA WILLIS / 14

AT THE BUREAU:

FRANCISCO ALECHA

FRANK COYNE

JIM DALFERES

BLAINE LEGUM

CHRIS MOORE

ILEANAOROZA

MIKERUDEEN

ANDI SERVOS

CINDY STEVENS

PAGE 168 /

The Hullabaloo has this year, as usual,
gone through its share of staff
members, associate editors, editors.
The stamina, the dedication, the sheer
energy needed to face the pressure of
meeting a weekly deadline each Friday
has taken its heavy toll.

Still, It seems that the paper has suf-
fered little from its traditional staff turn-
overs, success has been made in turn-
ing out a paper of consistent high qual-
ity The Associated College Press has
awarded the Hullabaloo an "All Ameri-
can" rating for the fall semester, when
Margaret Blain took over the editorship
from a retiring Tom Ireland.

Miss Blain in turn handed over the
editorship to Pat Schuster in the spring
semester, stating that she wanted to
establish a policy of changing editors
according to the calendar and not the
school year, in order that the new editor
could benefit from "being broken into
the office." Although only a sopho-
more. Miss Schuster has seemingly
taken her new position in stride, thus
portending at least a possible success
for the paper in the upcoming school
year.

Fortunately enough, both Ireland and
Miss Blain have remained on hand to
help the paper and its too-small staff.
Possible friction between the old-timers
on the staff and a large new generation
of reporters and editors has to a large
extent been avoided or overcome; in
any case, next year the paper will be
composed entirely of staff members
who were not on hand two years and
who will have to handle all aspects of
putting out the paper themselves. This
semester has been a good, and a nec-
essary proving ground for them.

The paper has suffered from a short-
age of reporters who would later be
in a position to move up onto the edito-
rial staff. This can be attributed to a
number of factors, not the least of
which has been the necessity of pro-
moting the few good reporters the
paper did have to editorial positions
only weeks after they had first entered
its basement offices. Nevertheless, the
Hullabaloo has had a larger crop of
senior reporters who could be called
upon from time to time to handle stories
the rest of the staff has had no time
for or to go into some in-depth report-
ing on specific issues. One of the great-
est problems in the upcoming year,
however, will be to insure that more
reporters, who are both good and de-
pendable, will be writing for the paper

This year's paper has tried to reach
more elements of the campus commu-
nity than it has. perhaps, in the past.

A mark of its success in this regard has
been the large number of letters and
"One Man's Opinions" the paper has
received. The student senate president
has been given a column, as well as
the photography editor; the editorial
pages have been expanded; the whole
editorial quality has been improved;
and an excellent series of articles con-
cerning the whole communications
media in New Orleans has been pub-
lished. Film Week and Scenes have
provided drastically needed services
forthe University community, giving the
best list of events happening on or off
campus that is to be found in any city
publication. Bulletin Board continues to
provide its needed services.

DAVID MAGRISH
DAVID FINKEL
MIKE KUTTEN

The Hullabaloo has had its share of
problems this year. The technical qual-
ity of the paper has dropped during the
spring semester. Some intra-office fric-
tion between old and new members of
the staff has developed, thus mitigating
the camaraderie needed to keep staff
members working and to function as
a well-oiled and happy unit. The Hulla-
baloo will undoubtedly face difficult
problems in the upcoming year. But
then, it has always seemed to eventu-
ally overcome whatever shortcomings
it might have, at least until new, dif-
ferent ones spring up.

—Jim Dalferes

A & S '71

/ PAGE 169

JAMBALAYA

STAFF

FRONT:

TRICIA HOPKINS
MATT ANDERSON
SHELIA SILVER

BACK;

RICKSTREIFFER
WYLIE DAWSON
JON BLEHAR

ARTISTS

BILL CLARK

RUSTY JOSEPHS

FRANCISCO X.ALECHA

TOM PELLETT

Publication
Photographers

not pictured:

Matt Anderson

Bud Brimberg, 3rd Eye

Farrell Hockemeier

John James

Mike Smith

/ PAGE 173

Frosh

& Student

Directory

JON BARNETT
RICHARD BRETZ

PAGE 174 /

Tulane

Law

Review

The Tulane Law Review, now completing its 45th year, is
a scholarly legal journal published quarterly (December,
February. April, and June) by honor students from the
Tulane School of Law. The Review publishes articles by
heading legal commentators — scholars, professors,
judges, lawyers — and by students on the Review. Its
current circulation is about 2,000, including one of the
highest foreign circulations of any law review in the
country. Because it is located in Louisiana, the only state
using the Civil Law as its basic law, the Review has
traditionally concentrated on the Civil Law and the
Louisiana Civil Code and has become a major authority
on the Civil Law. Comparative law and codification have
also been of special interest to the Review. While
maintaining its civilian traditions, the Review has in
recent years broadened its scope into areas of the law
that are of a more national interest and that are more
relevant to contemporary legal, social, and economic
problems.

— William E. Brown
Law 71

1/ David F. Edwards

2/ Bruce M. Horack

3/ William L. Guice

4/ Robert R. Casey

5/ Anita H. Ganucheau

6/ Charles B. Hahn

7/ W. E. Noel

8/ Cynthia A. Samuel

9/ Joseph L. Parkinson

10/ James A. Burton

11/ Lawrence P. Simon

12/ Andrew L. Plauche

13/ Clinton W.Shinn

14/ Walter C. Thompson

15/ William E. Brown

16/ William N. Kammer

17/ Rutledge C.Clement

18/ Edward 8. Dubuisson

19/ Judy N. Tabb

20/ Machale A. Miller

21/ P. J. Stakelum

22/ Donald A. Shindler

23/ Sergio A. Leiseca

24/ Helton G, Marshall

25/ David A. Marcello

26/ Harry A. Rosenberg

27/ Robert E. Washburn

28/ Irving 8. Shnaider

29/ Thomas T. Steele

30/ Geoffrey H. Longenecker

31/ David A. Kerstein

Missing:

Gerald A. Bosworth

Kenneth E. Meyer

Malcolm A. Meyer

This year's editions of the Frosli and the Student
Directory were the efforts of primarily two people.
Jonathan S. Barnett and Richard Bretz. Frosh '74
provided a brief pictorial essay of student life on
campus and in New Orleans. For the first time,
freshmen received the publication JDrior to their
arrival at Tulane. with a glimpse of what to expect in
September. The Student Directory received a big
assist from Bill Nelsen. Director of Records and
Registration. His registration records were the
source of the names and telephones of the
students. As a result the Directory was the most
accurate ever published and was available in early
October. For the first time in many years there were
no severe criticisms of either publication.

-J.S.B.andR.B.

/ PAGE 175

PAGS 176 /

1/ Ian Shupeck
2/ Greg Kopp
3/ Al Agricola
4/ Ann O'Brien
5/ John Ramirez
6/ Tom Planchard
7/ Dave Epstein
8/ Kathi Zemann
9/ Don Newcomb
10/ Alan Orkin
11/ Marty Dietelbach
12/ Rick Calcote
13/ Gary Gerson
14/ Cathy Doran
15/ Steve Bancroft
16/ Sam Hills
17/ Kerry Barnett
18/ Annette Breazeale
19/ Scott Gardner
20/ Steve Murphy
21/ Adrian Dickstein
22/ Don Oliver

23/ Bob Schwartz

24/ Jeff Chilldon

25/ Ladson Webb

26/ Jerry Clark

27/ Mary Beth Curtin

28/ Larry Kaiser

29/ Ed Porter

IN STUDIO B:

Steve Bancroft

Bobbie Bledsoe

Jill Ehrenberg

Scott Gardner

Ellie Hellman

Amy Kotick

Marty Nasdan

Steve Rappeport

Dave Ream

Bob Ruderman

Dynamite Slade

Greg Stec

Robert Thompson

/ PAGE 177

PAGE 178 /

Metropolitan
New Orleans/

population:
1 .3 million/

two daily
newspapers

'news papers ;

/ PAGE 179

It is only natural that the cinema is the art
form that today's student is interested in, for it
is the Twentieth Century's major contribution
to the field so long delineated by such
standard art forms as the play, the epic, the
novel, and the poem.

Here at Tulane, we have witnessed the birth of
a course in appreciating films, as well as
workshops in photography, camera technique,
and film making.

Students are also as interested as ever in
attending movies, perhaps now with a slightly
more critical eye. The movies of 1970-71, as
shown by the major Hollywood producers,
have indicated a desire to capture the college
audience; to make their products "relevant" to
today's society. In this, some have
succeeded; many have failed. What is
particularly deplorable are those producers
who seem to think that a certain "formula" is
all that is necessary to insure financial and
critical success.

The following review is of such a movie,

T.H.E.

Hollywood

Formula

By Jim Dalfares

S'T'U'D — produced by Joseph E. Levine,
directed by Stanley Kubrick, screenplay by
Harold Robbins, adapted from the book by
Gore Vidal, music by Burt Bacharach, starring
Charlton Heston, Rex Reed, Clint Eastwood.
Senta Burger, and Mickey Rooney: with
Caesar Romero. Flip Wilson, Desi Arnaz, Joann
Worley, Woody Allen, and the Guatemalan
Army. A Paramount Pictures release in
Panavision and Technicolor and color. 156
minutes.

S'T'U'D is an adaption of the timeless story
of the Prodical Son, illustrating the conflict of
the generations as well as the sociological
process of initiation into manhood. Since
Turgenev, modern art forms have tended to
emphasize the political turmoil between
fathers and sons (and mothers), and S'T'W D
is no exception. In this tasteful adaptation by
Harold Robbins, however, the son returns
home not to seek forgiveness but rather to
burn down the farm.

If this is indeed a film for all ages, its relevance
to the contemporary scene is soon made
explicit. The father (Charlton Heston) is the
President of the United States. Rex Reed
plays his rebellious son Harvey — a liberated,
gay, college radical.

Father's troubles are overwhelming. Besides
having to deal with problems of National
Security and helping to stop a riot in the
college his son attends, his all-precious time is
consumed by trying to squelch rumors started

by muckraking journalist Chill Wills (always
on the lookout for "moral degenerates") that
son Harvey has just been picked up by the
vice squad on a morals charge for going
AC/DC in D. C. with a black beauty queen
named Geraldine.

Harvey's troubles, across the generation gap,
seem no less formidable. His ideological
commitment is on the radical left, but he is not
man enough to hold a gun and level it to a
pig's head. He is alienated from his
background, but his Weathermen friends soon
ostracize him for "copping out." He can never
take full control of a situation.

Fortunately for Harvey, Heston rescues him
from his internal turmoil by acting as a deus
ex machina (he's had a lot of practice) and
seeing to it that Harvey is conscripted into the
army.

Harvey tries to fail his physical by getting
turned down on a Section 8, but to no avail. In
a brilliantly conceived black comedy sketch,
the Army psychaitrist (Woody Allen) lisps,
"The United Thtates needth more tholdiers like
you."

The remaining 30 minutes before the
intermission is taken up by the subplot, in
which Heston is scheming to embroil the U. S.
in a war so that the special forces contingents,
which have recently returned from a war "in
Southeast Asia" can go fight somewhere
else — anywhere other than U.S. shores.

PAGE 180 /

w ^<' ^J I 1 QJ (

150¥3H0WlM^n I \

uU('lr//40l|/'Mlf///0ll///:

Kj ^^' L.j — K^ — y,:^/ ' \^ - ^^.^.r - v.-/

Pulling out a C.I. A, directive for such an
emergency, Heston learns that in the past,
whenever the U. S. has been faced with the
dreaded reality of the blood-lusty Marine
returning home, she has involved herself m a
war south of the border so she could ship out
the Marines at first opportunity. Heston
therefore maps out a plan for the overthrow of
the dictator (Caesar Romero) of a Central
American banana republic.

As luck would have it. Harvey is assigned to
one of the head units leading the invasion task
force, known as S'T"U*D (so secret a
detachment that Its full name Is never
revealed). S*T"U"D, led by Colonel D. L. Doe
(Clint Eastwood) is trying to place a puppet
ruler (Desi Arnaz) in the governmental palace.

Just before the fadeout ending the first half of
the movie, we see that Harvey has not yet
changed, and that it will take S'T"U*D to
make a man out of him. Instead of practicing
calisthenics and bayonet attacks, Harvey
spends all his time oiling the bore of his M-16
and rubbing linseed oil into the stock.

By the start of the second half, we see that
Harvey is finally becoming acclimated to
Army life. I.e.. learning to kill with pleasure. In
one terse scene, an exasperated Doe however,
tells Harvey to "get thee to a nunnery." an
order that he takes at face value. There he
meets a winsome Sister Virginia (Joann
Worley). and he soon puts his army training to
good use.

After raping the somewhat reluctant nun of
Monterrey, Harvey feels that he is now a man
since, as he explains, he has "made it with a
woman." In a brilliant soft focus shot, director
Kubrick captures Harvey's grim determination
and his viril fortitude as he mows down a
village of peons with his machine gun.

In subsequent fighting around the Presidential
palace (the one used for Bobbins' "The
Adventurers"), Harvey's skull is grazed by a
rifle shot, and he later wakes up in a guerilla
jungle village with a complete memory loss.

Nursed back to health by a demented
Albanian dwarf in exile (Mickey Rooney),
Harvey is fed only cornmeal and Maoist
propaganda by the dwarf's interpreter (Senta
Berger), since the guerilla leader himself
speaks only the Serbo-Croat,

His mind dazed by amnesia. Harvey is only

the more receptive to Marxist rhetoric, and he
is programmed by Senta Berger to lead a plot
to assassinate the President of the United
States; the guerillas not realizing that the man
is, in actuality, Harvey's father.

The irony of Harvey's relationship with his
father Is fully realized. Before, Heston decried
Harvey's radical attitudes and his
unmanliness. He had him dratted to make him
a man. Now though, Harvey has become man
enough to become the real radical
revolutionary who returns home to burn down
the farm.

Harvey quickly infiltrates the net of security
surrounding the President, not understanding
all the while, how he knows where the Secret
Service lookouts are posted.

He enters a darkened room: a light in the
corner illuminating only a man bent over a
large oval desk. Raising his revolver. Harvey
is on the point of squeezing the trigger when
the rising crescendo of his emotions. In turn
triggers his memory, and he realizes what he
is about to do.

In the climatic scene which follows. Harvey
confronts his father with all his fears, his
frustrations, his sublimated hostilities. He
reprimands his father for "not accepting me for
what I am " In the tear-)erklng reconciliation
that follows, we learn that father and son are
not completely devoid of communication with
each other, as Heston falls to his knees and
embraces his son.

In the epilogue. Harvey is found back in
college, his lather is content once again with
having only World War III to worry about, and
Harvey finds eternal bliss with an assistant to
an associate deputy undersecretary of Health.
Education, and Welfare.

Rex Reed certainly delivers a commanding
performance, worthy of an Oscar nomination
at least, Kubrick, Levine, and Robblns have put
It all together in S'T'U'D. so if you want to
know where it's at, this is one you shouldn't
miss.

/ PAGE 181

MONACHINO
& SUMMER LYRIC

The Tulane Summer Lyric Theatre began in 1968 as a joint
venture by the Department of Theatre and Speech, the
Department of IVIusic, and the Center for Teacher Educa-
tion. For each of the past three summers, Lyric Theatre
has presented a series of three musicals or operettas. The
program has grown from an experiment into a fully recog-
nized, permanent, University program, offering graduate
and undergraduate credit in each of the three depart-
ments.

The creator and director of the program is Francis
L. Monachino, associate professor of music. The
JAMBALAYA interviewed Monachino in December.

Monachino joined the faculty of Newcomb College irl
1967, coming from the University of Southern Mississippi.
Prior to that, he had had a 17 year career as a profes-
sional singer in New York. He has worked with such peo-
ple as Gian Carlo Menotti, Mike Todd, Laurence Olivier,
and Leontyne Price in the original television presentation
of "Tosca." He appeared monthly on NBC for 12 years,
and he has made appearances on Omnibus, and the Hall-

PAGE 182 /

mark Hall of Fame. In addition, he has performed with
numerous opera companies.

From its conception, Monachino has felt that Summer
Lyric Theatre should be a "showcase for regional talent."
The University is an ideal setting for this type of endeavor.
Here one can find available, existing facilities, a base of
community support, administrative services, and faculty
members qualified to direct the various aspects of the
program. In return. Lyric Theatre offers talented students
and faculty a chance to gain valuable experience and
work side by side with professionals, and it offers the
community a form of entertainment that might not be
available otherwise.

In the past. Lyric Theatre has offered such shows as
Carousel, The Sound of Music, The Mikado, The Pirates of
Penzance, and The Merry Widow. Plans for the 1971
season include Die Fledermaus, South Pacific, and The
Vagabond King. In 1972, the program will be expanded to
four shows, and plans now call for extending the opera
workshop part of the program to include presentations
during the regular school year.

What does it take to get an audience to something like the
Summer Lyric Theatre?

First you have to come to an understanding of your audi-
ence. If you decide that the purpose of your theatre is en-
tertainment, then you put your emphasis on people, the
people in the audience, and the people on the stage . . .
and there is nothing to be ashamed of in that.

Once that choice is made, then what does one do? What
do you do here?

You try to create an atmosphere where everyone is com-
fortable. Up until the 1950's, people went to the theatre
precisely to be entertained. That doesn't mean that from
time to time a play doesn't come along to instruct —
Winterset is a good example. Plays also have "messages, "
but a play that is just message is not really a play. So, the
person that has a message usually tries to cloak it in an
entertainment package. People have stopped going to the
theatre because they don't have a good time. No one
enjoys going to the theatre to be instructed in their social
consciousness. Now that's not saying that the message
doesn't have validity; it may have all the validity in the
world. But it is like a religious message. People aren't
going to church either. People just aren't comfortable
being preached to. The^e has been this change to Europe-

an pessimism in the hands of great artists — Sartre and
lonesco. And this change has taken place on stage, too.
Essentially there are two ways of looking at man. through
rose colored glasses or blue — steely blue — cold glasses.
And right now we are looking through blue cold glasses.

What about the New Orleans audiences?

Strictly rosy. People enjoy commg to Summer Lyric
Theatre. Think of the creature comforts we offer. We serve
refreshments for practically nothing. We encourage
children to come, which makes it easy for a man and wife
to bring their family. And the audience has some feeling
for what they are seeing, some familiarity. After all. the
American musical theatre is something we are brain-
washed in. But it is also renewing something. Doing the
type of theatre we do is, of course, an exercise in nos-
talgia. New York and London, for example, are renewing
old shows. No No Nanette and The Vagabond King. Old
movies. Laurel and Hardy, Bogart, have a wide followmg.
even the old movie techniques are being used. It's like a
Max Sennett comedy. But nostalgia is not the only
influence by any means. Art moves forward rapidly. Hair is
already passe today. Art is both a reaching back and a
moving forward.

■|

■

^Hb i '"^

^^gpj

Don'i people still use this tendency towards nostalgia to
draw crowds?

Sure. Everyone tries to get the crowds. Anyone who thinks
that MaratlSade isn't a crowd pleaser doesn't know what
they are talking about.

What do you think of what happened at La Mise En
Scene? (This refers to the raid by the New Orleans Police
during a performance of MaratlSade which resulted in the
closing of the show.)

I think it is extremely unfortunate. I had seen the Royal
Shakespeare Company production, but they used older
people. This production was more a gathering of young
people. Of course, obscenity is in style now. There are
movies in town far more obscene and they are completely
exonerated.

What do you think will happen with the plans to bring
in Hair?

I have a hunch that they are going to try to keep Hair out?
Hair has, of course, played in many other places. But I
think that they may have been trying to serve warning to
the people bringing in Hair. (We are informed as of April that
the Civic Theatre did cancel the planned engagement.)
What can be done to improve the arts at Tulane?
Our arts are channelled through student activities as con-
trasted with some of the great schools of fine arts, where
it is considered important and handled as an academic af-
fair.

What about bringing in the National Shakespeare Com-
pany? Doesn't that suggest that Student Activities is
taking a more serious approach to the arts?

That is booking. Something like that is handled by a com-
mittee as it should be. But that's different. No, it's difficult
to suggest that chorus and theatre and opera workshop
be removed from student activities.

Do you think we need more facilities or just more money
channelled into the old ones?

We need both. Being realistic, new facilities are not likely.
We need a lightning rod for money. This means that the
programs have to expand — very carefully expand as
we grow.

How do you see Tulane students in relation to the arts?

Tulane students are culturally deprived. They are exposed
to the arts, but they come, in the main, from homes where
the emphasis is not on the arts. They become critics too
soon. One would hope that they would stop being critics
for awhile and pick up a paint brush, or study an instru-
ment for ten years or join a summer musical company.
One would say how marvelous that they are reaching out
and exploring, feeling and getting the sensual kicks of
this experience. Our people withdraw into self-contempla-
tion rather than becoming a part of these things. We
need to do.

Summer Lyric Theatre is a success, isn't it?
Yes. We are now a permanent program. People in the
community are now raising money for us, and we are in
the black. We hope to have a little profit to put towards
opera during the regular year. I'd like to have $5,000 for
an opera. Old Baroque operas or modern operas which
are not getting produced. I don't know how the students
would buy this, but we owe it to the students, the Universi-
ty, and the community to try. Here is an example of how
you build an audience. I'm giving them their candy during
the summer. Lyric Theatre is the candy store, but then in
1972, Summer Lyric Theatre is being expanded to four
shows, with more opera workshop performances planned
during the regular year.
What motivates you?

I think it is my feeling about performers. Regional oppor-
tunities are what is needed. The thing to do is develop a
theatre which is not based on the star principle. People
don't come to our performances to see a name; they come
because they have a good time. And the cast has a good
time and gains valuable experience.

PAGE 184 /

What would you prescribe for students here /n order to
overcome their cultural deprivation?

I would prescribe that people jom a musical organization,
that they join the theatre, that they get involved. And this
may strike some chords that hurt, but they should stop
thmking automatically that they have extraordinary ex-
pertise at the age of 18 or 19. They should be willing to
learn from someone who is being paid to teach them. The
idea that to get together with some friends and do the
same thing you've always done — that this is some great
mstructive device — is fallacious.

You seem to have some rather unusual ideas for a
professor. Not to put it in political terms, but you seem to
be both liberal and conservative at the same time.

Well. I like to think of myself as a true revolutionary.

- Greg Ridenour & Matt Anderson

/ PAGE 185

campus nitei

FIRST ROW:

Dick Sparpstein
Pat Lee

SECOND ROW:

Robby Smith

Lie Steele

Steve Jones

Sondra Daum

James Guyer

Susie Davidson

Hal Crocker

Lucile Page

David Carey

Patti Prescott

Punki Burghauser

Dwight Bowes

Alma Cuervo

Fred Herman

THIRD ROW:

Jim Merrill
Helen Sneed

PAGE 186 /

)

"Confessions of a Carpathian
Chanteuse", whicfi opened Wednesday
night and runs through this Sunday, is a
witty musical-comedy concerning the
plight of a jinxed summer theater.
The plot revolves around the director's
(Robby Smith's) attempts at organizing
a cohesive show under impossible
conditions: his two stars (Punki
Burghauser and Dwight Bowes) are a couple
of back-biting narcissists trying to
regain their former professional status. The
sets delivered to the troupe are
hopelessly mixed up. and underlying it all
are some just as confused love affairs.
The resulting play-within-a-play is
an outrageous series of flubbed lines
and upstaging, and the consequences are
just as surprising.

Co-authored by Don Oliver and Patrick
Shannon, the story flows naturally, and
the humor ranges from broad satire
to the sharp cutting exchanges between
Burghauser and Bowes . . . Oliver has
also composed the musical score which is a
high point of the production. He has obviously
been influenced by good show music, but
this is not to say the score is in any way
unoriginal . . . coupled with the score are
Annette Harper's fine lyrics. No lines are ever
forced, and they can be funny ("The
Innuendo Tango"), satirical ("Ah! Love!").
or touching ("I Guess Someone WillTell Him").

Flashy sets and costumes are critical
to this type of play, and "Confessions" has
them — thanks to Richard Gaines, The sets
are bright and harmonious and can change
rapidly with a minimum of distraction. His
costuming is colorful without being gaudy.
except in the cases of Burghauser and
Bowes where they are suitably tawdry.
The only flaw in the opening night
presentation seemed to be the
choreography. Only about one-third of the
songs were dance numbers and these

seemed strained as expected.

the actors were a little shaky during the
opening night first act. but by the second
act they were in complete control and put on
the steam. The cast is to be praised for
braving the less-than-perfect acoustics
of Dixon Hall and emerging successfully . . .

CHRIS MOORE

Tulane Hullabaloo

March 12. 1971

Kuypers

Seventy

PAGE 188 /

Being free from fhe obligafions

and regimens of the musical

profession is a state to which

John Kuypers is not accustomed,

but not one alien to his nature.

However, his retirement this year

from a 45 year career in music

has released him into such a

state. This imminent retirement

caused Kuypers to become the

subject of several articles in the

local news media, including an

interview broadcast by WWL-TV,

in which he looked back over the

first 70 years of his crowded and

active life.

Kuypers began teaching at

Hamline University in 1932 when

a cut on his hand temporarily

forced him to quit playing the

viola with the Minneapolis

Symphony, a position he had

held since his 1926 graduation

from Carleton College, where he

had majored in English and

music. Since that time he has

taught continuously, with the

exception of one semester.

Though his first experiences with

JHi

^^^

^^H

l^gV. ^'

New Orleans came through the annual tour visits of the
Minneapolis Symphony, Kuypers' first teaching job here
was as a visiting professor at Dillard University in 1958.
He began teaching at Newcomb in the fall of 1960 as
director of choral activities, which involved the training
and direction of the Tulane-Newcomb A Cappella Choir.
In addition to his teaching, Kuypers has been very
involved in the music life of New Orleans. He has
directed the Concert Choir of New Orleans since 1959.
and he has appeared as guest conductor with the New
Orleans Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra a number of
times.

To his teaching, Kuypers brought a love for and
personal involvement with his subject matter. His
lectures were sprinkled with stories from his longtime
study of musical history, and with anecdotes on
conductors, fellow orchestra members, and certain
works from his days with the Minneapolis Symphony.
These, his thorough knowledge of the works
themselves, and his frank comments on the life and
problems of the professional musician combined to
make his courses fascinating, and even thrilling.
Apart from music, Kuypers' greatest love is the sea and
sailing on it. He has been fascinated by the sea since
boyhood: at the age of 13. he sailed to India from his
native Holland as an apprentice sailor. This love for
sailing has never diminished. He taught several people
here how to sail and regularly spent a good deal of time
sailing on Lake Pontchartrain.

Upon his retirement, Kuypers is moving to Italy. He will
spend his summers near the sea in a villa at Arpino
which has belonged to the family of his wife, Donatella,
for four centuries. "I have no plans for doing anything,"
he said. "I will simply follow my fancy,"

Lee Wilkirson
A. & S. '74

ACAPELLA CHOIR A CAPELLA

SOPRANOS: Christine Boyer, Mary

Carrigan, Susie Cooke, Lisette

Hays, Jenny James, Rose

McCabe, Margaret Miller, Peg

Miller, Nanette Mollere, Guamnetta

Plummer, Linda Raspolich, Shelley

Seaman, Jan Shanhouse, Janet

Taylor and Nancy Williamson.

ALTOS: Stephanie Arthur, Carol

Coleman, Jane Faulkner, Kathy

Hagaman, Janet Hume, Ram

Jones, Chachi Martinez, Ann

Muller, Diana Nadas, Debby

Olivera, Debbie Sabalot, Karin

Swenson, and Connie Zendel.

TENORS: Alan Hill, Ray Johnson,

Jerry Mercier, Dick Orwig, Emmett

Price, Bill Toups and Keith

Wismar. BASSES: Tyler Apffel,

David Carey, Bob Dawalt, David

George, Lee Goodman, Steven

Hartberg, Charlie Hill, Roger

Longbotham, Bob Mendow, and

Russell Weaver.

PAGE 190 /

CHAMBER CHOIR: Stephanie
Arthur. Susie Cooke. Bob Dawalt.
Lisette Hays, Alan Hill. Janet
Hume. Pam Jones. Roger
Longbotham. Chachi Martinez.
Bob Mendow. Jerry Mercier. Peg
Miller. Emmett Price. Jan
Shanhouse. Karin Swenson.
Russell Weaver. Nancy
Williamson, and Keith Wismar.

/ PAGE 191

The Arena
30, 31 and Nov. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, ]

~* o

^ ^•

^^ ^

o ss

I-- sr

•-' o

- s

I— ' CO

Ins n

PAGE 192 /

HE SPRING OF 1967 was certainly a dark period for
Tulane's Department of Theatre and Speech, During
that semester, six of the nine faculty members
resigned their positions at Tulane. Among them was
Dr. Monroe Lippman. the man who had initiated
theatre courses at the University in 1937. and had
served as Chairman of the Department from the time
it was created a few years later. Not only did the
Department lose many of its valuable personnel, but
it also lost the nationally known and respected
Tulane Drama Review, a scholarly magazine devoted
to the art of theatre. The sudden and drastic
reduction of the faculty also necessitated
cancellation of the doctorate program in theatre.

Those of us who remained in theatre were
determined, as was the University administration,
that theatre at this institution was not to die. Of
course, we had to reassess our capabilities in

/ PAGE 193

theatre education and production, and redefine our
goals. But we knew that a valid and valuable theatre
program was possible within our limitations, and
under the leadership of George W. Hendrickson, we
began to rebuild.

One of the problems with the former Department was
that it had, to the detriment of the undergraduate
studies and activities, become top-heavy with
graduate programs. When I first arrived here, the
number of graduate students in the Department was
almost ten times the number of undergraduate
students. For a Department that had started out as an
undergraduate extra-curricular activity, this result
brought many priorities into question.

We felt that one of our responsibilities in
reorganizing the department was to strengthen the
undergraduate program and make it the core of our
activity. The two graduate programs, the Master of
Arts and the Master of Fine Arts, would then take
their proper place as extensions and elaborations of
that central undergraduate core.

To accomplish this, the undergraduate major and its
courses were completely revamped and enlarged.
Many of the advanced graduate courses were
opened to undergraduates as electives. And in our
production undergraduates became the foundation
of the talent pool, both onstage and backstage,
where they had once been elbowed into the
background by graduate actors and technicians.

While dealing with these matters "at home," we also
had to correct the widespread notion over the rest of
the country that Tulane Theatre had been laid to rest.
Advertising and personal contacts helped. But such
recent attention as our production of Oh What a
Lovely War being chosen to represent the State in a
National Theatre Festival is our best weapon against
this "rumor of death."

Where is the Department of Theatre and Speech
today? We have a strong and varied Bachelor of Arts

PAGE 194 /

program with 32 majors, each getting training and
experience in all areas of theatre with opportunities
for advanced study in each area. We have a strong
academic degree in the Master of Arts program. And
we have the Master of Fine Arts programs and pre-
professional advanced degrees in the areas of stage
design and directing. Production activity is at its
height, with major productions. M.F.A. graduate-
student-directed shows, studio performances, one-
act afternoon productions, and classroom exercises.
Workshop series in acting and body movement are
filled to capacity. Performers and teachers have
come to the University for special performances and
training sessions.

Theatre dead to Tulane? — Don't believe it!

—Larry Warner

/ PAGE 195

'*, ./*^y,..

^^^

rfOI-l'WHATA
LOVELY WAR!

"M'lords, ladies and gentlemen, may we present for
'^^mmgBt- you the ever-popular War Game!"

With these words and the crack of a whip, the eighth

and supposedly final public performance of Oh What

A Lovely War began. However, who of us realized on

that evening of December 13, 1970, that this was not

to be the culmination of five weeks (seven days a

week, including Thanksgiving recess) of rehearsal.

Who ever imagined that this was'not good-bye to the

play which had once again made the Tulane

University Theatre an integral part of the Tulane

Campus . . . Oh What^a Lovely War was just

beginning its career as "the show that never died,"

pa«;f. 196 /

■

^^^^^^H^^^^^^B^^^^^^^^^^^^^^IP^B^^^^^^^H

j^^Hi

E^^

iJli

1^.

^^^B^^Bfl

This play had been different from the very

first day of auditions, when "experienced

TUT actors" had been called upon to sing

and dance in order to be considered for a

role. There had been problems: the little

lady in Washington, D.C., who all alone

handled the rights to "Lovely War" in the

United States, but who was never available

(she only worked part-time) for information

about the size of World War I slides; the

posters that didn't quite mal<e it; the

handwritten score that no one could seem

to play; and "Uncle Roy" Longmire

constantly wailing that we just didn't have

any more money.

However, there were the advantages:

tremendous actor training stemming from

the need to change roles about twenty

times during the show; grueling dance

rehearsals yielding better body control;

and the discipline gained from knowing that

one had to be exploding with energy for

every performance, because pace, timing,

and bright eyes were so important to this

show.

The play had cost a lot, and so we had to
be sure to" have large audiences every

night; that is, large audiences that would

like and understand the show, and would

encourage their friends to come.

Attempts had been made in the way of

direction to make the play more relevant to

American college students of the Viet Nam

era. The style of the beginning of the play

was changed from that of a pierrot show to

a minstrel show, a form of theatre more

familiar to American audiences, and then,

the viewer was gradually eased into the

very British sort of humor — and

history — which dominated the play. A

very Brechtian newspanel rolled out

statistics in Allied-Chemical style, with

messages such as; "ALL QUIET ON THE

WESTERN FRONT . . . ALLIES LOSE

850,000 MEN IN 1914 . . . "Meanwhile,

pertly dressed actors sang and danced the

songs of that period. The contrast between

the oblivious joy of the people and the

deaths on the battlefield was poignantly

displayed in this manner.

Publicity was even different from the usual
sort, being highlighted by a parade through

all the cafeterias on campus (excluding
C.R., where we were banned) during
lunchtime on the first Friday of the play's
run. Armed with costumes, props, and a lot
of guts, the singing cast met applause and
received recognition wherever it went. We
also had full houses just about every night

afterwards.

Perhaps one of the greatest moments of all

came with the arrival of a telegram from the

American Educational Theatre Association

on the day after we "closed" telling us that

our production of Oh What A Lovely War

had been selected to represent Louisiana in

the Region V conference of the American

College Theatre Festival. We were

surprised and happy to hear that the

University had responded to our need by

offering to foot the bill. (Uncle Roy was

elated!)

Once again there were problems. Dance

numbers had to be re-worked for a bigger

stage, and two cast members had to be

replaced. This meant a whole new series of

rehearsals — this time in Dixon Hall and/or

PAGE 198 /

the Cram Room. However, despite the

natural complaints, there was still a

tremendous enthusiasm and unity which

sprang up within the Department, because

at long last, something we were proud of

had been ostensibly appreciated outside

the Theatre Department.

On the morning of January 19, we all

boarded the bus for Fort Worth, where the

festival was to be held. That evening we

pulled into the Worth Hotel and nervously

awaited the upcoming performance the next

day.

The show went well, despite our inability to

use the important newspanel due to

technical difficulties. We were all awed by

the comparative extravagance of the Scott

Theatre (the new IVIet compared to our

Phoenix Playhouse), as well as by the

quality of the majority of the productions.

Five states were represented by seven

plays. We saw them all, made many

friends, and gained invaluable experience

in theatre.

Although Tulane was not chosen to go to
Washington for the national festival, our

local reviews were quite good, and two

members of the cast were given awards by

AETA for their individual performances. Of

the twelve such awards given, eight were

given to actors from the winning shows.

We brought back memories, friendships.

and regional recognition for Tulane, as the

kind of theatre school it had once been.

And. happily for all concerned, TUT

Players were able to bring to Tulane the

director of one of the winning plays to

conduct a weekend acting workshop for

theatre majors as well as for the cast of

Campus Night.

Obviously, "Lovely War" was lovely, and

performing once again for the alumni on

tVlarch 28 was an honor and a pleasure.

For Tulane University Theatre, thanks to
.his play:

"A little further we will go, oh, oh, oh, oh.
Then we'll drop both our oars
Take a round of applause
And then we'll go, go, go."

— Alma Cuervo
Newcomb '73

/ PAGE 199

The Tulane campus acceptance
of ROTC is another case of "isn'f's.
It isn't militantly hostile nor
enthusiastically supportive. In
the wake of prior years' demon-
strations, the worst harrassment
the freshman cadets and mid-
shipmen have received is good-
natured kidding from acquaint-
ances. At the same time, ROTC is
no longer touted as the repose of
the most dynamic, talented lead-
ership on campus, even by the
commanding officers. The mood
now seems to be one of accep-
tance of ROTC as a valid option to
those who desire it, and harmless
to those who don't. Cadets are no

PAGE 200 /

longer considered to be war-
mongers, and those opposed to
ROTC are no longer considered
criminal anarchists.
To the ROTC participant himself,
things are considerably different
from prior years. Curriculum
changes in all three programs
have changed the ROTC class
from a crib "A", busywork course
to a serious academic effort. Par-
ticularly in the Army program,
changes have included the insti-
tution of history and political
science courses taught in the re-
spective Arts and Sciences de-
partments, and the introduction of
academic study of management

and leadership in the military
classes. As a result, the ROTC
curricula at Tulane are consid-
ered among the best and most
progressive in the nation. This
was borne out by the ROTC
freshmen, who generally praised
their classwork as interesting and
challenging. Still around, howev-
er, are regulations concerning
hair, dress, and discipline: these
seemed to represent the area
which elicited the greatest
amount of dissatisfaction among
the cadets and midshipmen.
One of the more sustaining
aspects of the ROTC picture
which is not generally known or

1968-69 1969-70 1970-71

AIR FORCE enrolled

scholarships

ARMY enrolled

scholarships

NAVY enrolled

scholarships

200 112

(not available) 23

appreciated is the University
Committee on ROTC Programs.
This year, the committee, which
began as an ad hoc committee
resulting frorn the ROTC demon-
strations, was formally chartered
as a permanent University com-
mittee. Composed of seven facul-
ty, two students, one adminis-
trator, and the three senior ROTC
officers, the committee serves as
the governing "department" for
the ROTC programs at Tulane. It
is empowered to "advise the uni-
versity ... on all matters con-
cerning ROTC Programs at Tu-
lane", to "review all ROTC
courses . . . about both content
and University credit", to review
and make recommendations on
all new ROTC officers proposed
for faculty duty at Tulane (with full

veto power over appointments),
and to "hear appeals from
students enrolled in ROTC on
matters concerning their academ-
ic standing in ROTC" (quotes
from the Committee charter).
These., extensive powers are a
direct result of objections raised
by students and faculty to the
operation of ROTC at Tulane.

In the spring of 1971, it seems
more appropriate to write of what
ROTC at Tulane isn't, instead of
what it is. That ROTC prepares
students for commissioning in the
armed forces, and includes
classes, drill, and summer train-
ing is generally known. What is
not known, even by many of those
in the ROTC programs, are some
of the profound, if subtle, changes

which have taken place in recent
years.

Participation in ROTC has quite
obviously experienced a signifi-
cant decline. In interviews con-
ducted with the unit senior com-
manding officers, the consensus
opinion was that this is due at
least in part to the general
decline of the image of ROTC and
the military as a whole. Even in
the short span of four years, the
change in attitude from one of re-
spect and admiration to one of
reluctant tolerance has been
noted by many observers. Col.
R.W. Aronson of the Army astutely
characterized this disenchant-
ment with the military as periph-
eral to the larger "national
debate" over our goals and val-

PAGE 202 /

ues, which has been motivated by
questioning of the American in-
volvement in Southeast Asia.
Other reasons suggested for the
decline are lower draft quotas,
the initiation of the lottery system,
and the reduced activity in
Vietnam, whereby many college
students feel less threatened by
the likelihood of induction.

So why join ROTC? A number of
freshmen related that they en-
tered with the intention of waiting
to learn their lottery number, and
then continuing on to the ad-
vanced program or dropping out
on the basis of their number.
Indeed, the attractiveness of
serving one's military obligation
as an officer rather than as an in-
ducted enlisted man was the most

frequently cited reason for joining
ROTC. The scholarship programs
offered by ROTC also attracts
some participants. The number of
scholarship recipients, who re-
ceive full tuition and fees,
increased while the total enroll-
ments decreased. In fact, for the
academic year 1970-1971, Tulane
received approximately $330,000
in scholarship tuitions from
ROTC. Proposed legislation rela-
tive to establishing an all-volun-
teer armed force would almost
double the total number of schol-
arships available nationwide, as
well as increasing the monthly
stipend paid to each recipiant
from $50 to $100, in order to at-
tract more participants. Tulane is
one of the few universities to still
offer its student body a choice of

all three ROTC programs. Next
year, pending university adminis-
tration approval. Air Force ROTC
will begin accepting women in the
advanced program, leading to a
commission in the Women's Air
Force.

Perhaps ROTC will not survive at
Tulane, especially if selective ser-
vice is eliminated. But for now.
ROTC offers a choice to those
who desire it. brings considerable
scholarship monies to Tulane.
and is attempting to improve and
bring the ROTC programs up to
the academic level and responsi-
bility expected of any other
department in the University.

—WALTER LAMIA

/ PAGE 203

(^ ^ — _ ' -i'

k ,

4X'

.!)'■ w y

^ n (»

» .■ t

Qrrnr-j

^-^^ ^ c^ ._^ ...a^ ^ ^ .^ ^.< . ^ ---^- Y

, / ^..„^.. -- ^^~— ^ ^ ^^' -' 6 '

V*MrN_<[^

'^^^ ^ iJ «-) -^^o->^ ■f^'-r-^ -.<v— ^- , T^I^ cO

x^s^-^A^

I PAGE 205

i^s^^o

^ ^ Yt. ^^ ^' ^j^-— (^ CM .Ur <U^ l^i^t^ ■ '-^ ^

u-^i. -fe ^ --3 •/-- -^--- -^-' ^^,^ p-uu -. .^ ^

Jt 4 —J- -<U -UV -i--!^ '— ^-A^--'' "^- "• iK'

V ^^-^ --- ^—^ -^ ^^' ^-.t'-^

cUj

PAGE 206 /

Matt,

It would appear that I have been quite negligent in conveying
any thoughts to you, but the situation is always one of confusion
and general chaos. I suppose that you have heard by now that
I'm stationed in Korea. I've never been so cold. Seoul is one of the
most polluted cities in the world, and they just started to industri-
alize in the late 50's. Without the U.S., Korea would be one big
garbage heap. We are greeted here with open palms and very
little else. A couple of generations of Koreans have learned to
play on the sympathy of the average G.I. Away from home and
with few friends, the G.I. usually searches for a little entertain-
ment. The clubs here play American music, the prostitutes dress
like American girls, and the G.I. winds up spending his paycheck.
I am keeping away from all that because it's just not for me. I'm
angered at the double standard of many who come over here.
They write home about the hardships and loneliness, yet they
keep what is called a "moose" for about $100 a month. What she
is, is nothing more than a steady whore. Americans are ob-
noxious as hell and try to push a lot of these people around.

You would love the attitude of a lot of guys here. They all con-
sider the Army a great big joke. We go to work each day and
forget it after 5 P.M. Everyone plays the Army game for what it
is. There is always a lot of discussion and people keep their
minds healthy. The whole peace movement has not been in vain.

I can remember how the yearbook once was so antimilitary.
and I wholeheartedly agreed. Being in the military now, things
have changed a good bit. Being a soldier is a rather thankless job.
Nobody wants to be away from their home, family, and friends.
We agree with the objectives of the peace movements, but are
rather limited as to what we can do. You know how the military
judicial system works. Kids shouldn't condemn us all as if we
were the criminals. We are fighting our own battles within the
Army, and we have won a few concessions. The Army is scared
of what can happen. We just don't take orders without question.
All of us are men who think of what the situation would be like
back home if we just followed blindly. Please try to make the
kids back home understand how we feel. There is nothing in this
world that we want more than peace. Whenever they see a sol-
dier, they should try to smile and not curse at him. We have
decided to play the game for a short while, then go out into the
real war to change the world. School is fine and entertaining, but
there is so much more. One has to be committed, not to a grand
scheme, but to his fellow man. Don't be pushy about it. just be
honest.

I'm sending this small drawing executed during a fit. Also, it
you want to print some of my letters, go ahead. I shall probably
hear about it, but I must be heard. You can edit all you want — in
other words whatever would be most dangerous to me. Let me
hear from you.

Peace,
Chief

/ PAGE 207

.|AMII\I.AYA 1971

MATT ANIIERSUN

l»RIN«:iPI.K ACCMMI'I.ICES
FRANC:iS<:<> \I.E(:iIA. JIM IIAI.FAKKS.

wyi.ie itawson. i*atri<:ia hopkins,
kic:k strkiffkr. am> siifii.a silvkk

ARTW<»RK

FRAN«:i.sf;<) Ai.E«:iiA/ 76, 98, 179. nii.i. ri.ARK/ 17.
20. 12. RisTV josF-Piis/ 26-;{5. tom pellet/ 61,
104.

photography

MATT anofrson/ rover, i, 8-9, 10-13, 46, 47, 58
(lowtT n.). 39 (lop). 60 (loji, mill., lower left), 62,
66 (lifl), 69 (nii.l.), 70-71. 73-7.'>, HA, 106. 109,
110-113, 111-117, 121, 122.12.S, 126-127, 136-139.
110-115. M6-I17 (ihhI. .-inil lioi.). 148-149. 1.50
(l.oi.), 151 (lop), 153 (rl.), 1.56. 1.59. 160 (lop).
161. 162-165. 169. 174. 182-191. 193-199. 201. ri<:k

l>RAKE/ 90-91. STEVE FEPER/ 88-89. EI.LEN

ha><:kki./ 38 (top), farrei.i. iiorKEMEiKR/ 2-3, 5,
I 1-15. 18-19. 24. 37. 38. 41. 43, 41, 49. 58 (hot.
Irfl), 60 (l.ol. rl.). 64, 65 (rl.), 66-67. 69 (l.fl &
iirl.). 77. 78 (lioi.), 79, 80, 81 (lop l<fi ^ ••m-). 96-
97. 128-129. 150 (lop), 151 (lioi.). 170-171. 17.3.
177. 179. 202-203. .ioiin .iamks/ 146-147 (s.-
<liiini<). damp i.AN<;sroN/ 157. t«im i.ee/ 22-23.

AARON NAVAIl/ 100-101. «:OI.VIN NORW«»OI»/ 50, 55.

p\T PRINS/ 92-93. MIKE smith/ 6. 45. 59 hoi.).
63. 72.84.86-87.91-9.5, 102. 118-120. 1.30. 132-133.
1.52-153. 154. 1.55 (lifi), 167. 168. 176, 208. Har-
old SYLVESTER/ 160 (bol. rl.).

'(IT"

TULAN

NE\A/ ORLEAN

VOLUME

JAMBALAVTV

UNIVERSITY

LOUISIANA

4 / ARCHITECTURE
10 / ARTS & SCIENCES AND NEWCOMB
54 / J. Y. A.
58 / ENGINEERING
66 / COMPUTER CENTER

68 DELTA REGIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER
70 / GRADUATE SCHOOL

84 / GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
88 GRADUATE ENGINEERING

92 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MEDICAL RESE.4RCH AND TRAINING

93 / HEBERT CENTER

94 / SCHOOL OF LAW

100 / SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK
104 / SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
114 / LODGES

Fifth Year

PAGE 4 / Architecture Seniors

MIKE MATASSA / 1

CHKIS KMGH T / 2

ROC.KK IIKOWN / 3

.MAH^ s( IIAI IJ / 4

UESSIE WVMA> / 5

JERKV STEPHKNSON / 6

PETEK SMII.KSINGER / 7

HI I>V IIAKTO> / 8

JOHN HA.NNA / 9

lUHJ OEMAFU <) / 10

JAMES SAI.MI / 1 I

I.KWIS <,H Vf.m / 12

I'KIUfi ( OUKI II / l.'i

E\E VAI.KVIINE / 14

KALI'll WAtEH / lo

KE.N LEVINE / 16

nil.I. STAI.EY / 17

MI< HAKI, M IS / 18

BOIl CAMPFIEI.I. / 19

I.EE IRK E / 20

MIKE <;ahiiom / 21

lULI. UAER / 22

RANDOLPH VON BREYMANN / 23

MANIEI. DEI-EMOS / 24

HENRY 1)1 PI.ANTIER / 25

JOH HI KMVK / 26

WYLIE HAWsoN / 27

JEFF <.ARin / 28

BETSY BALDRIIM.E / 29

STEVE MANN / 30

ON THE BIS:

BOB FLACK

CEORfiE MILLER

GROVER MOLTON

BOB RICH

/ PACE 5

Fourth Year

1 / DALE ZINN

2 / ANN QUARLES ZINN

3 / JOAN KING

4 / BOB FATOVIC

5 / ALVIN COX

6 / BRYAN THOMPSON

7 / LEE TMCE

8 / CHARLES MCGEE

9 / JEFFREY ARMITAGE

10 / DR. BERNARD LEMANN

11 / JAMES REID

12 / SHELDEN CANTOR

13 / ANTHONY TAFFARO

14 / AARON NAVEH

15 / SAM CRAWFORD

16 / DANIEL SIGAL

17 / ROBERT WILSON

18 / JOHN DRYE

19 / RON BARLOW

20 / HAROLD PIQUE (SKIP)

21 / WALTER DALY

JURY WEEK CASUALTIES;
RICHARD BAUMANN
WILLIAM CAMIN
JOHN HOBBS
JACOB KATSMAN
GEORGE KELLY
MARY MCELROY
NICHOLAS MUSSO
HENRY POTTER

PAGE 6 / Architecture Undergraduates

Third Year

1 / JOHN SAIBER

2 / DONALD BERG

3 / WILLIAM KENDRICK

4 / JOHN FERNSLER

5 / MIKE MASON

6 / BILL SEALY

7 / BOB LE-VY-

8 / LARRY WIZNIA

9 / ANDY SPATZ

10 / PALL NAECKER

11 / STEVE NEWMAN

12 / BRIAN SAYBE

13 / GARY CONNOR

14 / COLLINS HAYNES

15 / TAYLOR BLOOD

16 / KEITH HOOKS

17 / LLCAS CAMBO

18 / STEVE RICK

19 / RICHARD REEVES

20 / JANE EVANS

21 / ANDRE \TLLERE

22 / STEVE GARDNER

23 / JIM FARR

24 / F. L. WRIGHT

25 / MERRILL BROWN

26 / STEVE SOBIERALSKE

27 / GLEN LEROY

28 / KNOX TIMLIN-
STUCK 1> ELEVATOR:
ELIZABETH ACOSTA
BETSY BALDRIDGE
MARY CINNINGHAM
DEAN JOHNSON
CHARLTON JONES
MIRIAM LEMANN
JERRY LEMANN
SALLY NETTLETON
HARRIET SEIDLER
ROBERT TOM

ERIC VAN REED
KAREN WIZMA

/ PAGE 7

Second Year

1 / GILL JAFFE

2 / THOM JEIVKS

3 / TIM FRECH

4 / FRANK RIEPE

5 / SUE VAN HART

6 / LEO WIZNITZER

7 / TERESITA CASTELLANOS

8 / HARRY B. SMITH

9 / LARRY HESDORFFER

10 / MIKE HOWARD

11 / CHRIS BENTON

12 / CLAUDE BEAUDREAULT

13 / JOHN BRADLEY

14 / STEVE ROBBINS

15 / SONNY SHIELDS

16 / J. AUSTIN

17 / CAL JONES

18 / MARTY CYBUL

19 / PETE SMITH

20 / CARLOS CESPEDES

21 / CHARLES MONTGOMERY

22 / FRANK MASSON

23 / MIKE STEIN

24 / STEVE KITKO

25 / JAMES REINHART

26 / CLIFF ROSS

27 / MARK MILLER

28 / CHUCK MCKIRAHAN

29 / MARK BADGER

30 / AL MARTINEZ

31 / JAMES CRAWFORD

32 / FRISCO X. ALECHA

33 / TOM PORTER

34 / THORN GRAFTON

AT THE ZOO:
ALICE EICHOLD
SARA HILL
PAT LAREDO
RICHARD MASON
TANNAZ NIZPOUR
EUGENE OGOZALEK
BOB TURNER

PAGE 8 / Architecture Undergraduates

FinsT Yeah

1 / MARK SPELLMAN

2 /THOMAS SAINDEKS

3 / «:nius young

4 / Ol It LOCAL FKIEND

5 / DAVID «;kant

6 / HANK LONG

7 / NICK POWELL

8 / PHILIP DREY

9 / CHICK AVEHBACH
10 / DENNIS I>RE<;0

I 1 / JANINE COLLINS

12 / JOHN Ronit

13 / PETER SniPSON

14 / ROBERT OLIVIER

15 / CARL VIAGILL

16 / ALEX ALKIRE

17 / PETE BARICEV

18 / MARSHA BROWN

19 /.IE AN DE BARBIERIS

20 / BOB STRIIMM

21 / R. C. SMITH

22 / CHARLES SPANSEL

23 / DENISE MICHELET

24 / DWIGHT THEALL

25 / STEVE TOl'SEY

26 / :M0N TY SMITH

27 / MICHAEL RICHARDSON

28 / JOSEPH DAVIS

29 / ARTHl R PEDLEZ

30 / ROBERT RICHEY

31 / CRICKET MOORE

32 / ROLAND FANGUE

33 / SERENA RANDOLPH

34 / ROBERT SCHOEN

35 / STEVE JOHNSON

1 28 I 29 \30 ) 31 Viz

73 3(34 L

V-,

('~nV \ j / \ ^

r~0 / U'* } /

<^\(yY

vXr^

^-fiWM^^

"^^ H 1

Mr")).

I V

\ ts V, /I J(

s ^ \

> r1 ^ k

OIT TO LUNCH:
GENE BATES
TONY BILTMAN
KENNETH Bl RNS
MIGIEL CARLO-COLON
CLYDE CARROLL
ROBERT CHAPMAN
LAWRENCE COMISKEY
JOHN DABNEY

ROSS DOW mm;

PAl 1. Dl PRIE
lERHY KVBER
PATRICIA FISHER
DANIEL HALL
TIIO-XIAS H VYDEN
DON \I.I) HOMINGS
SI SAN lion ION
KENT JOHNSON

LA^^R^:M K J(>sephson
ciRi jorc;ens

ANTONIO LI CAS
ROBERT -Mi KENNON

Rolu i<r MONs Mtn vi

HE< roR N VD\L
I \l RIK PETIPVS
PEI'EH S( IIMIDT
JOHN rVMPMN
sIMHOS VAMVAS
(.ERAI.D WA«;N0N
JERRY WITHERS
WII I I VM >\ UK. Ill'

DAVID ABERCROMBIE

CHUCK AtLEN

MARTOEL ALLEN

RICHARD K. ANDERSSEN, JR.

SAMUEL HENRY ANDREWS

LINDA ARONSON

MARILYN ASHER

JOHN AUDICK

CECILIA AUSTIN

JOSEPH BAGGETT

EMAY BUCHANAN BAIRD

VICTOR J. BARBIERI

ROBERT B. BARBOR

JONATHAN S. BARNETT

STEWART R. BARNETT, HI

THOMAS BARTON

JEFFRY A. BASEN

BRIAN BASH

BERYL BECKER

MARCIA BENNETT

GREGORY E. BERTUCCI

RONALD S. BERTUCCI

DON BLACKARD

ALEXANDER H. BLUESTONE, JR.

LES BOCKOW
OFELIA CRISTINA BOGRAN

DAVID CORIELL BOOTH
C. DE FOREST BOUDREAUX
RALPH STEWART BOWDEN

BARRY HOWARD BRAUN

STEVE BOYD

BONNIE BRODY

CORMETT R. BROOKS

PUDDIN BROWN

CHARLES W. BROWN

JOSEPH R. BROWN, JR.

R. LEONARD BROWN, JR.

JOSEPH BRUCE

LILLIE BRUM

ANDREA BUCARO

ILENE BUCHALTER

BRUCE A. BURGA

PAGE 10 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors

1)1 VNK HI H.NSIDE
LINDA f;. CAIIAI-

cordon ransdell cain

«:athy cai-Isch

.JOHN PAi I. c;ampbeli.. hi

< I.Al DKITe' CAMPBELL

DAVID B. CAMPBELL
RI< IIAKD A. f:ANTOR
JOHN E. CAREY
H. PHILLIP CARNES
MARKIE C:aRRELL
SHARON CARRIGAN

ELLEN CARTER
SHELLEY CITRON
SUSAN CLADE
PEACHY CLARK
CLAfDE CLAYTON, JR.
CRvVWFORD CLEVELAND

Hti li 'f n

BILLY F. CLINCON
JOAN CLONINCER
ROBERT COIVILLON

BRLCE CRAIG
PALL EDWARD CROW-
MARY MARTHA CVRD

STEPHEN C. CIRTIS
JAMES G. DALFERES
DALE DANE

ROBERT t . DART
CECILIA C. DARTEZ
SONDRV DAIM
CWEN DAVIDSON
KENNY DAVIS
MARK S. DAVIS

HECTOR DEL CASTILLO
SIZANNE M. DEL MARMOL
GERALDINE S. DE LONG
SANDRA L. DENARI
CHARLES E. DK. WITT. JR.
RICHARD DOBKIN

/ PAGE 11

SHELLEY DORFMAN

JOHN CLAY DORRIS

JIMMIE DRESNICK

GEORGE BRYAN DUCK

KENNETH DUCOTE

PRISCILLA DUNN

W. CLARK DURANT, III

DONNA JEAN DYKES

JEAN B. EAGAN

TERENCE D. EDWARDS

RICHARD EICHENHOLZ

JAMES S. ELLIOTT, JR.

GENE ELLIS

RANDALL C. ELLZEY

CHRIS EVAJNS

MARY FABRE

DAVID M. FAJGENBAUM

STEVEN B. FEDER

STEVEN FELSENTHAL

MARTIN FENSTERSHEIB

THOMAS N. FIDDLER

ELLEN FINLEY

LORI FINN

LOXLEY FITZPATRICK

SUSAN FLAMM

SHERRY FLASHMAN

MARY FRANCES FONTE

ELIZABETH WILL FOUTS

PHILIP L. FRANK, JR."

KATHERINE ERASER

CLAY B. FREDERICK

CAROL FREEMAN

LOUIE D. FREEMAN

PATRICIA FRIELDER

CHRISTOPHER BURKE FRUGE

JIM GARTS

PAGE 12 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors

■v»u ii\Ki. (;f.krke.n

MHIN (.11.1.
It Mill VH A (.INSni RG
M Al(^ ANN <.I.L<.K
ll\l(IIV GOLDSMITH

Kt N Ml 11 ri. (.()[ lis I y [N

JANirE I.. MARIA GONZALES

LINDA «. ON/, A IKS

HOIIKKI f . «.<MH)\VIN

ULn V GORDON

PEGGY F. i.ORDON

RAY f;ORDON

II \RVEY GROSSMAN
JAY GRIBER

WALTER GRLNDY
EDWARD GSCHWENDER

GORDON GSELL. JR.
MARTIN RICH.ARD H.AASE
GWENDOLYN C. HAGER
JOHN HALEY
BARBARA B. HALL
LISA HALL

MEREDITH A. HARPER
NANCY HARRIS
VIRGINIA HARRIS
SANDRA S. HARTLEY
STEPHANIE HAYNES
ELISE C. HAYS

A. CHRIS HEINRICHS

NED HEMARD

JOEL HENDERSON

JEAN BARTON HENRUKSON

MIKE HENRY

JANET HETHERWICK

DAI F R. H!I nING

DEIHDKV mil

NAN! Y «.OLDSTKIN HOFFMAN

PHILLIP H. HOFFMAN

CAROLYN HOLDEN

RICHARD r. HOOVER, HI

/ PAGE 13

PATRICIA LOUISE HOPKINS

MARK R. HOROWITZ

TOM IRELAND

ROBERT IRVINE

SHELLY ITELD

JOAN L. JACKSON

MARY ELIZABETH JACKSON

SARALYN JACOBSON

HARRY JOE

GREGG JOHNSON

KAREN GAIL JOHNSON

BRUCE S. JOHNSON

STELLA A. JONES

MARCIA LEE JORDAN

KIM JOVANOVICH

RONALD KAPLAN

DENNIS KASIMIAN

MARY KAY

SAM KAYSEN

CHARLES F. KELLEY, JR.

THOMAS N. KENNEDY

MICHAEL J. KHOURI

LANA KILLGORE

BARNEY KING

RICARD KINGREA

JOHN C. KIRCHNER

RICKEY C. KIRKPATRICK

MANUEL L. KNIGHT

PEGGY ANN KOVEN

KAY KRAFT

STEVE KRAMER

MONTY KRIEGER

ALAN D. LAFF

CATHY LAMPARD

TUPPER LAMPTON

ANTHONY V. LA NASA

:- .->

i^ili

m. ^"*- /

PAGE 14 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors

f) A f^

ELRCIA C. LAND, JR.
LUCY LANE
LEE LATIMER
EDWARD LE BRETON
BRLCE F. LEE
ROBERT LEE

RICHARD H. LELCHUK
TERRANCE J. LESTELLE
RICARD D. LESTER
JAMES LELNC
ROBERT N. LEVINSON
GARY ■MORTON LEVISON

CLIFFORD J. LE\'Y'
LESLIE ALL LEWIS
RANDOLPH G. LEWIS
LORAINE A. LOCKWOOD
DALE C. LONG
PETER A. LOPEZ

ALBERT S. LOW, JR.
SALLIE LOWENSTEIN
STEPHEN P. LIKIN
MICHAEL H. LLTZ
WILLIAM B. MABRY
MICHAEL MACWILLIAMS

MICHAEL L. MAGEE
LAUREL L. MALOWNEY'
IRW^N MANDELKERN
KAREN MANEMANN
SANDRA MANSOm
ROBERT L. MARCUS

LEON E. MARTINY
MARY MATHEWS
MARYANNE MC ALPIN
JOHN C. MC CARRON, JR,

MARY J. MC CLINTOCK
ED MC CORD
GEORGE F. MC COWIN
LEO MC KENNA

MARY MC KINNEY
EUGENE B. MC LEOD. JR.
JAMES R. MC NEAL
DAML MERDES

/ PAGE 15

MARY MEREDITH

JILL J. MEYERS

MARGARET MILLER

PATRICIA MILLER

STEPHEN A. MOGABGAB

PATRICIA ELSE MONACO

FRANCIS M. MOORE

RON MOORE

MARGO C. MORET

EILEEN DWYER MORRIS

MARCIA G, MORTENSEN

EDWARD J. MOSKOWITZ

MELINDA MOSS
PHYLLIS MURPHY
GEORGE MUSHKIN

MARGARET N. MUSSER

JOHN C. MUTZIGER

FRED B. NEGEM

JULIE ANN NGUYEN

ANDREW G. NICHOLS

ELAINE NODEN

WALTER NORTON

ELLIOTT NOVY

PHYLLIS NUGENT

ILEANA OROZA

CHERYL A. PALERMO

RUSSELL PALMER

MURIEL S. PALMGREN

ARTHUR F. PAULINA, JR.

JOHN R. PEMBERTON

SUSAN POLACK

H. LOUISE PORZIG

JAMES P. PRICE

PATRICIA E. PRINS

DANIEL E. RASKIN

CHARLES H. REDMOND, II

PAM REICH

A. L. RICE, in

EDWARD C. RICHARD

%J^/'

^^[

PAGE 16 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors

i^M

FAV AYfeX K RIDDLE
<;HK<,0H\ p. ItlDt.NOLR
XHIA KII.EV
A.N.NK HISER
LEWIS S. ROACH
E. HOBERSON

WILLLIAM A. ROBINSON
KATHLEEN L. ROi.GE
E. < VTHERINE ROSE
LOUS HOVELLI
CHARLES S. RIARK. JR.
RORERT RIDERMW

CLIFFORD NEIL SACINOR
JOHN SALSTONE
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
K. DICK SANDERSON

MIKE SANFORD
SAM SCELFO
JAY SCHILLER
TERRY SCHREIER

NANCY- JO SCHWARTZ
SHELLEY A. SCOTT
JOH. W. SE,VRCY
RAYMOND C. SECHERS

THOMAS SENETTE
PAMELA JANE SHAW
STEVE E. SHAW
DONNA SHERH)CK
H. EDWARD SHERMAN
MARIVN SHOSTROM

CYNDI SHOSS
JERRY E. SIMS
TAMARA SINDLER
BETH SINGLETON
RANDLOW SMITH, JR.
ROSE SMITH

SHVRMAN S-MITH
STl \RT S'^lll s
VI \ I> H. >(>! OMON
DON \l.D .). SOMMERS
W\1.TER SOMMERS
V\ VN It. s(1l I y. IR.

/ PAGE 17

CHARLES L. SPENCER

STEVE SPOMER

LOUIS J. STANLEY

DIANE STASSI

WILLIAM D. STEGBAUER

PEGGY STEINE

CYNTHIA STEVENS

RONNIE STEWART

SUSAN STINE

D. KIRK STIRTON

MARK STOOPLER

MELVIN V. STRAHAN

TERENCE K. SULLIVAN

JOHN R. SUTTER

CAROLE SWANAY

HAROLD SYLVESTER

BETTY SUE TALBOT

JAMES P. TATUM

FRANK TEDARDS
RICHARD TELLER

KATHERINE TEMPLETON
DOROTHY TOBY

JUDSON E. TOMLIN, JR.

SHELBY TOMLINSON

JOSEPH F. TOOMY

CRIS TRAXLER

ANDREW M. TREICHLER

LAURA TURNBULL

PAGE 18 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors

STKPIIAME L. TWII.nECK
IIHlMAS K. VAN IJt sKIItK
SIKI'HKN A. VANN
< AI«»LI>K VINCENT
JOAN D. VI NOT
ANNA WADE

SI SAN ,1. W VDE
RO<;En W \<,M VN
SI SAN W\(,NKR
JOSKI'H M. \V VI.KER

VASCO WALTERS
JACQl EI.YN K. WARR
ROBERT H. WATSON
STEPHERN B. WEBB, HI

CRAIG WEIL
RIKI WFINSTEIN
RITH E. WEINSTEPS"
ROBERT r. WESSLER

DEBORAH WHALLEY
CASSANDRV WHEELER
DIEDRE P. WHITE
MILDRED WIENER
ALICE WILBERT
A. SHERRY WILENSKY

JOHN WILLIAMS
JOHN S. WILLIAMS
LINDV WILLIS
TV^T VR \ WINTER

CAROLYN S. WOOSLEY
ERK WORRVLL
C. K. H. WRI(;HT
WILLIAM WRIGHT

MARt.ARET YANIS
STEPHEN ZAGOR
SISAN ZELINGER
CONSTANCE ZENDEL
M^RTHV JVNK ZIMMERMAN
ROBERT Zl RC HER

/ PAGE 19

WILLIAM ABERMAN
CONSTANCE V. ABRAHAM

BILL ABRAMOWTTZ
LAWRENCE M. ABRAMSON

GALE ADAMS

PATRICIA ADKINS

BONNIE ADLER

AL AGRICOLA

STEPHEN AKIN

CHRISTY ALLEN

DANIEL ALLEN

VAVANN B. ALLEN

MICKEY ALLWEISS

JORGE ALVAREZ

THOMAS AMADIO

JEFF C. ANDERSEN

BEVERLY ANDERSON

CRAIG ANDERSON

DOUGLAS W. ANDERSON

LAURA ANDERSON

DENNIS M. ANGELICO

JAY ANTIS

TYLER APFFEL

EDWARD B. ARCHBALD

BILLIE ARMSTRONG

NEIL ANN ARMSTRONG

STEWART ARMSTRONG

RONALD J. ARONOFF

ELIZABETH P. ARONSON

JO ARPIN

STEPHANIE ARTHUR

PAUL ARVITES

MICHELE ASMUTH

NEVAH ANN ASSANG

RAY ATTANASIO

YUK LUN AU

TAYLOR AULTMAN

GIL AUST

ROBERT H. AUTENREITH

JIMMY ALTIN

PAGE 20 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

M Ml III \ A/AH
< mils M. A/IIILL
MIIIN .1. II\KIII(. Ill
llfM(^ I. IIVIIK
KOIIKKI II. II\II.KY
\I.A> K, IIAIHD

DIANK IIAI.KI.N

< IIAKI.KS W. nAI.I.

"NI \II(. \IIK I It M.IKNf.KH

MI< II VKI. t . IIM lOiri

slIKI.IV llVl.tll

l>OI<.l.\s MIC IIKI. IIAKIiKR

MAUI IN II\RI.s
DALE BARKEN
ItVRIlVHl IIVRNVRD
l( VKII VH V II \ltNt s
PMII.V I.. II VHVKs
KEHHV A>> HAHNETT

(.VII. l.'iNNK IiAK(JlL)I
MINDY BARRAR

nvwN nvRRios

Win.! VM T. H VRRV
JOHN BARTHELL
K. B. BASTIAN

I) Win A. BATEMAN
DAMP BATT
DAMD C. BAVMAN

MKRHII I 11 VI M V>
srE\ E II VI M VN
CARLOS A. BAVMVXN

k VHKN II VI M<. VKTF.N
K VM>I II VI MM f IN
,1 V>E HE V/.I.f/l

Isk V < . BECK

1. 1 HII VHI> UK KER

I Iss V K. IlEKHs

I IIOM vs IIHI.III KV

KKMV llEll.

(.EOEKREV r. UELLAH

/ PACE 21

DAVID P. BELLAMY

CHRIS BELLARD

BEV BENNETT

LISA BENNETT

KATIE BENTON

STEVE BENZULY

AL BERCER

BARBARA BERGIER

HOW^ARD C. BERMAN

GARY BERNARD

ROLAND LOUIS BERNELL

SUE BERNIE

MARILYN J. BERNSTEIN

RICHARD BERNSTEIN

ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN

MELISSA BERNSTROM

EARL BERTRAND

FRANCES BETHEA

JANE BETTS

ROBERT F. BIGHAM

MIKE BILLINGSLEY

DONNA BILTON

DOAK BISHOP

TtD BISKEND

BRUCE J. BIVONA

ROBERT C. BLEDSOE

JIM BLENDER

CATHY BLEVINS

EVA BLICKMAN

SANDY BLUMENFIELD

I^^HBP^

3t, ^

ANNE BODENHEIMER

LUCILE BODENHEIMER

BRUCE BOLYARD

BETH BONART

ALBERT S. BOND, II

ROBERT M. BONO

TONY BONO

GLENN BOQUET

BARRY S. BORDENAVE

THOMAS BORNSTEIN

JOSEPH BOUCHE

ANN BOUDREAUX

X .1 :.

PAGE / 22 Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

ANN \ MMIIf IIOI Itl.KOIS
J. \MI.I.I \M nut Hi
KI.I/.AIIKIII ItO^KK
PAT BOYLSTON

II Mill M( V nil Mil lll(l)
IIHIIX.KI IlKMllft
Mf I !«.>> \ 111! \MMKK

^^ II I 1 \ M I . iin wdes

NEAI IIHVVTLEV

\NNK I I K iiHt \/y: \i r

\MI,I I \M I. I11(K MIH.. JH.
I'M I liltK.M \N

NANf;^ T. BRES
MARGARET BRETZ
BRICK BRODNfiV
STEVE BROOKsHER
RI(H\RI) ItH()\Vl)\
BEN BIKJWN

ELLEN BROWN
H. WILLIAM BROWN
MARTHA BROWN
PAIL BROWN
ROBERT DROWN
RISSELL I.. BROWN

SISAN BROWN
SrSIE BROWN
BEVERLY K. BRINSON
BONNIE BRYAN
KOHKRT I.. BH^ \N
I'l I in l>. BR^ DEN

ALOISE Bl CKLEY
JEAN E. Bl KTrNER
JOE BILL VRI)
ELIZBETII Bl NTON

1 I ll^ I) V. Bl R vs

(111 KINE^ Bl RGE

rt NM III RGHAl'SER
.1 VNF 1 HI RNEV
■M \U\l/\ N Bl RRl S
\I \N Bl HTON

ixn t.i vs ^I. innNFS

N VM \ I . t VDK

/ PACE 23

JAMES CAIRE

IRENE CALDWELL

BARBARA CALI

BETSY CAMPBELL

MARTHA CAMPBELL

DANIEL CAPLAN

DAVID CAREY

WILLIAM C. CARLIN, JR.

PATRICIA CARLOCK

GAYLE D. CARP

MICHAEL CARRICO

MARY CARRIGAN

CAROL CASPAR

DENISE CASSENS

MICHAEL J. CASTEIX

DEBORAH CAVANAUGH

TONY O. CHAMPAGNE

JANE CHAPMAN

ROBERT CHAUVIN

MISSY CHEESEMAN

CAMILLE CHERBONNIER

SONIA T. CHIAL

MAURICE G. CHIDESTER

ALFRED B. CHILDS, III

WILLIAM P. CHISHOLM

ROBERT B. CHOATE

EMILE F. CHOPIN

MICHAEL P. CHRISTIANSEN

ERANKLIN CHU

MAUREEN CLANCY

DAVID F. CLAPP

BILL CLARK

CATHY CLARK

JERRY CLARK

STUART G. CLARK, IV

EVELYN L. CLAUSNITZER

PAT CLOSE

LEONARD L. COHAN

ALBERT COHEN

CYNTHIA J. COHEN

PAGE 24 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

GARY rOIIEN
HOHKFn I.. <:f)HEN
N \ TAI-IA rOKINOS
JKANNE <:OLAIIAN
< HARI.ES CULEE
J K ANNE COLEMAN

SA>DRA COLLIE
M Mfi vrxniE rOLONEV
IIAKIIAKA ((JMEAIX
KAHE.N CONLEY
srSAN J. fOOKE
.JAME <:0()PKR

JEKHtK^ It. ( OOPERMA.N

1.(11 coors

DKMSK COFM.ON
I'EGCY COPI'ERSMITH
MIKE rORNELILS
BRICE ANN CORNELL

THOMAS J. CORNELL
ALBERT J. «:ORNinE
SANDRA >I. CORRVO
MARY MARGARET COIRT
EMANIEL COIVILLON
FRANK COYNE

CARMEN CRAMER
1> V> ID » K VND\LL
M<»HHI> ( HISIKR
HAl. 1 1U)( KKH
TRl DY t Ht)M
ALMA E. CIEHVO

D V\ IK « I 1 \\ ELL
VI I \ (I VMN(.lliM
M \lt^ HI I II < I HTIN
I) V\ ID D VI I V
UK VDEOKI) DALLAS
Sll IRON DALOVISIO

/ PACE 25

CATHY DALTON

JACK DAMPF

MOLLY DANIEL

STEPHEN DANNER

WILLIAM H. DAUME

PATRICIA DAVENPORT

ISABEL DAVIDSON

SUSIE DAVIDSON

MARIA J. DAVIS

NUBBIN DAVIS

SCOTT DAVIS

MARY ANN DAY

LEE A. DAYNE

JOSEPH DE FR_4ITES

LAN DE GENERES

LAURA DEL PAPA

ANN DE MONTLUZIN

KYLE DENNIS

ANDY DESALVO

MARTIN DETTLEBACH

TERRI DIAZ

GINGER DICKEY

BARBARA DICKSON

DONNA DICKSON

KEITH DIFFENDERFFER

MARGIE DI JOHN

ELIZABETH DILLON

MARGARET L. DILLON
JAMES DI RIENZO
GLENN DISMUKES

LISA DIXON

WARD DIXON

FREDERICK S. DOBARD, JR.

WESLEY DOBBS

STEVE DOBRINIC

ERIC DOERRIES

DAVID R. DOLKART

MARTIN A. DONOVAN, III

CATHERINE DORAN

KATHERINE DORRIS

SUSAN DORSEY

MIMI DOSSETT

PAGE 26 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

MAHIHA I)f)VF:R
JKAN'MK IXJWI.IX,
MICHAEL DOYLE

I.F.K.II DH^KE
.JA\ [ll(f>KI>

TEDDY DRLSS
lUCIIARD L. DLCOTE

ciiiLDS E. Dr>n\n. in

JII.I. Dl.NCAN
RAY DINN, JR.
JAMES DINMGAN

COLEMAN DLPRE
MILTO M. DLREAl, JR.
DA.MELLE M. DITREY
DEBORAH DITTON
HOLLY EARL
HAND! ECHOLS

ALBERT F. EDWARDS
JEFF EDWARDS
MARGIE EDWARDS
BENNY S. EICIIHOLZ
nol <;i.AS ELHART
kVIHY ELLIOTT

KYI.F FLI.IS
nvRIIVRA ELM\N
VNGELI F. EL MERI
PA»;E ELMORE
N VI II VN R. EI.SON

jFi F enc;el

NOFI. KNCEMOEN
FHON H. EPSTEIN
UK II VIM) EPSTEIN
rnllN H. FRNST
M \H1 FNF FsKIM)
FENN II. El 11 VNK>

/ PACE 27

FLORA EUSTIS
MICHAEL E. EVANS

PAULA EVANS

NICHOLAS F. EWING

BETH EXUM

PHILIP A. FANT

REID FARMER

SIDNEY C. FARMER, III

JANE M. FAULKNER

GREGORY J. FAVRET

CHARLES FECHTEL

BRUCE FEINGERTS

ROBERT FELL

RONALD FELLMAN

WILLIAM C. L. FENG

JUDITH E. FERENCZY

MARY FERRARA

BARBARA FERTEL

CHARLES FETZEK

BRUCE FIERST

LIZ FINK

SUZANNE FIFE

VANCENE FINK

NATHAN FISCHMAN

JOHN S. FITZGERALD

MIMSY FITZPATRICK

MARSHA FLANZ

JEFF FLATER

THOMAS FLETCHER

DAVID FLOWERREE

MARGARET E. FLYNN

ANTHONY J. FONTANA

JULIE ANN FORB

BRUCE OMAR FORD

DAN M. FORESTIERE

STEPHEN FORRESTER

PAULA S. FORWARD

RICHARD FOUILLE, JR.

FLORENCE FOWLKES

PAGE 28 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

RiniAItl) KRA>ro
JA.NK I). F><\>K
I' AM KHANK
TIIOM A. KHANKLI.N
rORIK FRANZ
< . KirtK f RASKR

KI(H\Rr> \. FR\SER. Ill

HI I II f HA/.IOR

» Ml V fREKDMW

MM IIVKI. I.. FREEMAN

PETER I). FREEMAN

<;KFf;OHY I. FREIMKN

SISAN FRERE
KATHH^N FREY
ROBERT « . FREV
SISAN FREY
MAX FRIDMAN
ROM)V FRIEni. ^NDER

ELLEN FRIEDMAN
STEPHANIE FRIEFIELD
SHELLEY FROCKT
MARY E. FICET
JAMES K. FILLER
DE>rARClS CADDIS

BETH CADDY
DEBBIE CADDY
R\NDI CALANTI
Bl BBA CALLANDER
SEAN CALVIN
SCOTT CARDINER

AMY CARDNER
BECKY CARDNER
WILLIAM T. CARLANT)
<.WEN CARNER
SANDRA CVRRiRD
%VAYNE CVRRFTT

VLVN RFID C\RTENHOrSE

K \ltF\ (; VRTNFR
IlRl ( K H. CAYNES

< HVRLES CELLEH
mniK *. CEOCHECAN
DARYL CERBER

/ PACE 29

SHERYL E. CERBER

FILLIS GERSGN

GARY GERSON

JOSEPH L. GETTYS, JR.

PAM GIBBONS

PAM GIBSON

RILEY LEE GIBSON

TIMOTHY C. GIBSON

PETER R. GILLESPIE

RICHARD P. GILMAN

SCOTT K. GINSBURG

DAVID GLADDEN

MARCIA GLASS

ROBERT GLASSER

STEVEN M. GLAZER

R. BRADLEY GLENDENING

STEVEN L. GLICK

MARK GLIMCHER

STEVE GODWIN

DENNIS GOERNER

ELLEN GOLD

LISA GOLDBERG

WENDY GOLDBERG

GRANT GOLDENSTAR

MELVIN L. GOLDIN

PAUL GOLDSMITH

DEBBIE GOLDSTEIN

ESTHER GOLDSTEIN

JEROME ERIC GOLDSTEIN

SANDRA GOLDSTEIN

HAROLD T. GONZALES, JR.

RANDY GONZALES

GEORGIA A. GOODELL

JAMES K. GOODLAD

DAVID GOODMAN

DEBORAH L. GOODMAN

M^^i __\

PAGE 30 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

KOIIl.K I I.. (.(JOIlMA.N

«»vu.>KY (;<><)i)Ki(:ii

l)C»NN \ (,Ot SS

UK II \riii \ I \ N i.oi'ss

Mil II VKI. s. (.KADCS
V \I<()N <.i<AT/.

I)A\ 11) (.H VVK^

ttr.v.n onAVES

Mf Ki f.nFKvnFnr.

I(I( H Mtl) I . (.Hit I IN

< MiiMiiNf «.nu US

I.IMtV M. (.Hlf HTH

HOItFRT D. GROSSMAN
(ULCK GRLLL

RON GCBA

DENIS M. GtlLLOT

PATRICK D. GlILLOT
MARCIA GVMPERTZ
JANE GVRTMAN
JOHN C. GISTIN
ANDREW CITERMAN
LESTER GIT-M VN

PHVI LIS GITTERMAN
M ^H(.\RET H \( KLEY
NAN( \ H \( KNK^
Vl( KIE HVDinNHORST
CATHERINE HAGAMAN

K \iin II VI ntiwKn

ion HVLE

M>|)U II VI.L

imt s V H \I PIN

I JU)M \> 11 VMIU RCER

PAl L F. HANLON

V7II I H VNSEN

MI< H \EI P. HANTEL

I iiin^ II vnniN

J \>E H VRDER
KENNETH HARMON
M ^RK H\RNER

JOSEPH M. TivnniNCTON

/ PACE 31

JAMES E. HARRIS

KIM HARRIS

ROSLYN HARRIS

WANDA HARRIS

WILLIAM R. HARRIS

STEVEN HARTBERG

JOHN W. HARTLEY

RODNEY T. HARTMAN

DEBRA E. HARTZMARK

ELIZABETH HARVEY

JAMES H. HARVEY, JR.

JOHN HASPEL

TOM HASTINGS

JOCENTA L. HAWKINS

MARK HAWKINS

SUZANNE HAYDON

KENNETH HAYES

GEORGE ANN HAYNE

CHRISTINA K. HEABERLIN

DEBERAH ANN HEABERLIN

KAREN HEAUSLER

ROBERT F. HEBELER

DAVID B. HEBERT

KIRK J. HEBERT

GLENN HEDGPETH

ELLIE HELMAN

GLENN S. HELTON

AHMED M. HEMEIDA

RICHARD HENDLER

JOE HENDRIX

MARION HENLEY

JOHN RICHARD HENRY

ADRIAAN R. J. HERKLOTS, H

CAROL HERMAN

GILBERT L. HERMAN

JUDY HERMAN

NICOLAS HERNANDEZ

JAMES HERNQUIST

ELIZABETH HEROD

PATRICIA A. HERRING

PATRICK HERRINGTON

STEVEN HERRON

PAGE 32 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

WAITER IIFIER
LAI HIK IIKWIIT

SISA> HKwn-r

J«)H> A. HKYMAN
IIAiniAII\ UK KrNGBOTTOM
MK.IIAKL UK KOK

VNVF. Hir.r.INS
riNDV HK.MVS
Willi \M I. HUBERT
I)AHI.E>E HIIIIKKTH
HRI<;E \. Hill.
DOLGLAS W. HILL

GEORGE D. HILL
JEFFREY im I.
WILLIAM W. IIINKHEY
SrZA>NE IIIRSfH
ERir A. HITCIirOCK
PETER HITT

MARILYN MODES
PAM HOLBROOK
MITCHELL H. HOLLEB
DONAD HOLMES
FLIP HOMANSKY
CLIFFORD HORNBACK

EMILIE C. HOWARD
JIDY HOWARD
MARD HOWARD
EDDIE HOWELL

SALLY HOWELL
.JIIIVNNF III RER
WILLIAM HIRER
CHARLES HICKS

W. CAMBELL Hn)SO>, III
STEVE HIMCKE
JAMES J. lURLEV
PATRICIA HIRLEY

JAMES M. in -Nl V>
JOHN W. IIYSI av
SISIE ILI.INGWORTH
DAN IMMI>C

/ P\GE 33

DONAU) E. OIPSON

DEBRA IXKLES

ai. ISR-4EL

SHARLENE J. JACKSON'

GLENNA C. JACKSON

HEATHER A. JACKSON

JENNY JACKSON

JLDI JACOBS

LARRY JACOBS

SIDNEY JACOBSON

ANITA JARRETT

JUDITH ELAINE JEE

RONALD M. JEWELL

JOSE L. JIMENEZ

TOMAS JIMENEZ

KATHERINE A. JOHNSON

S.AR-4H JOHNSON

WEBB JOHNSON

FLELTl JOHNSON-MVLLER

ERIC JONES

GARY A. JONES

HENRY B. JONES

KAREN JONES

IVnCHAEL JONES

PAMELA JONES

SAMLEL A. JONES

STE-VEN JONES

SUSAN' H. K_AHLMUS

PAUL R. K.\HN

ANDREW J. KALLOK

RICH.ARD KANFER

BARB.AEl.\ KAPLAN

MICHAEL KAPLAN

SH.ARI K-4PLAN

ROSALYN K-4PLAN'

MRTIN KASDAN

JAMES KATULA

EDDIE KATZ

RICHARD KATZOFF

SCOTT KAUFFMAN

JAMES ROBERT KAY

LILA KAY

PAGE 34 / .\rts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergr-aduates

UK II \HI) I . KAV

Ml< II VKI .1. KKEFFE

<.K)H<,f. KLK.N

DOROTHY KfENAN
KIKT y. KKKSLER
KAim KLI.M

MERRILEE ANN KELL
VAX V KER>
RONALD J. KERR

DAVID L. KERSHAW
ROBERT KERSHAW
CHARLES KESSLER
BETSY KEYS
BRYAN EARL KIEKE
ERIC L. KIESEL

JANICE KILLEBREW
GINNY KIMZEY
FRANK M. KINDER
LtCIE M. KING
RAYMOND KINNEY
DEBBIE KIRSCHENFELD

JACQIELINE KIRVEN
ELIZABETH KLAFF
KAREN KLEGER
DEGRA LEE KLEIN
JENNY KNAPP
AMY SI E KNIGHT

DAVID J. KNIGHT
IIEDV I. KNOFF
KVIHIFKN TVIFH KNOPH
TONI KNORR
SALLY KNOWLTAN
JANE KOCHANSKI

.1 VMFS Konv
(.KOHGF KOHN
ROSVIIK M. KOLB
(.IIFGORV A. KOPP
I> VNIEL H. KOREM
WENDY KORNECAY

^r«j

/ PA«.E 35

AMY R. KOTIC

EVE KOVEN

DAVID KRACHE

LINDA KRAMER

SUE KRANTZ

THOMAS A. KREFFT

ROBIN E. KRIEG

SEVEN L. KRINGOLD

GEORGE G. KUBACH

ARTHUR F. KUEHN

JAMES KUNTZELMAN

MITCHELL KUSHNER

MELANIE KUSIN

MICHAEL JAY KUTTEN

JIM KWIATKOWSKI

J. SCOTT KYLE

DAVID LA CLAIRE

KENNY LA COUR

PAUL LACROIX

JONATHAN M. LAKE

ANTHONY LAMEY

STEPHEN LANDIS

LYNN LANDRUM

EDMUND C. LANDRY, JR.

J. MICHAEL LANDRY

NAN LANDRY

KIM LANDSMAN

LEE LANIER

PAUL LASKY

SUNIE LASKY

MARK LASSITER

SARAH T. LATHAM

SHARON LAUFER

KEITH E. LAURIE

STEVEN LAUSELL

KAREN LAUTZ

STEVE LAVEN

CAROL LAVIN

JIM LAVIN

JORGE LAW

H. HILLIARD LAWLER, III

ELIZABETH LAWLOR

^■^^ "^T^

PAGE 36 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

ROBERTA B. LAWRENCE
STEWAKT LAWRENCE
ALAN R. LAX
LALRA LEACH
GREG S. LEAF
CHARLES LEANESS

ELEANORE LEAVITT
BRYAN P. LE BLANC
StZANNE M. LE BLANC
JAMES LEE
BLAINE LEGLM
LYNN LEHNHARDT

PATRICIA LEIB
ALICIA LEONARD
STEPHEN LEPLEY
SHELDON LERMAN

CINDY' LESTER
RICHARD LEVENSTEIN
BARRY LEVINE
STAFANIE LEMNSON

ELYSSE LEvnrov

DEBBIE LEVY
ANN LEWIS
BETH LEWIS

DENNIS LEWKA
RENEE LIEBER
ELIZABETH J. LINDSAY
VERNA LINDSAY-

SARAH R. LINES
CAROLYN LIPSON
DEBORAH LIPSTATE
CIRTIS LU
CARY D. LIVINGSTON
MICHAEL R. LOCKWOOD

ALAN P. LOEB
JA>1ES LOGAN
HELEN LOKER
JOANNA LOMBARD
DANIEL A. LONG
DEBIE LONG

/ PAGE 37

JOHN LEE LONG

ROGER LONGBOTHAM

ERIC LOWE

RALPH MICHAEL LOWENBAUM

KIT LOZES

FRED LUERA

MARLENE LURIE

REIDY M. LUSTIG

WILLIAM LYON

LYNNE LYONS

HARRY J. MACEY

ELIZABETH MACKAY

RICK MACKIE

KIERAN MAGGARD

GALVIN MAH

PAUL MAIER

CAROLYN MANN

PEGGY MANNING

RAY MANNING

STEVEN J. MARCELLO

NORMAN MARCUS

JOHN W. MARKHAM

GEORGE MARKS

JIM MARKS

ALICE MARQUEZ

ELIZABETH MARSAL

DAVID MARTIN

FREDERICK W. MARTIN, III

HOLLY S. MARTIN

LYNNE MARTIN

SANDY MARTIN

BETH MARX

JOEL D. MARX

PHILIP E. MASQUELETTE

PATSY MATHIEU

DANIL MAUTHE

BARBARA MAXWELL

BETH L. MAXWELL

CATHERINE MAYER

JOYCE MAYERS

i
I

PAGE 38 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

NANCY ANN MAZIR
KATHERINE MC AKTHIH
FIOSK A. Mr. CABE

HosN.N.NA M«; <:affrey

Mll.onV Mf; TALIP
JAMES I.. MC CLLLOCH

JOHN M<; CLTCHEN
DANNY MC DAMEL
WVRREN I.. MC FERRAN
EI. K WOK II. MC fiAHEY
CAROL MC CEEHAN
DONALD MC GLY.NN

MIKE MC GLIRE
CARLCS MC INERNEY
JOHN MC INTYRE
MICHAEL MC INTYRE
ROBERT MC KAY
MICHAEL .MC KEEVER

JAMES A. MC KEIVER
JOHN MC LEOD
JOAN -MC Ml LLEN
JOHN MC >U RTREY
ANTHONY MEADOW
HLGH MEAGHER

VINCENT T. MEIS
JERRY MELTON
ELAINE MENDEL
MIMI >IETHVIN
DOUG MEYER
STEVE MEYER

PAl LA MICHAEL
ROBIN A. MICHAELS
JO\N ^IICHELSON
BETTY MILES
BRIAN >IILLER
MARGARET MILLER

Ml SYDNEY R. MILLER

MmiK MIIIOY

K VREN MILZER

/ PACE 39

SARAH MINARD

LOUIS MIRON

CLARISSA MITCHELL

DAVID MITCHELL

TRACY MITCHELL

BARRY MITTENTHAL

DEBORAH MOBBERLY

SUSANNA MOBLEY

JUDITH ANNE MOFFITT

PAM MONAST

MONICA L. MONICA

KENT W. MONIER

BILL MONNET

KATHE MOON

RAYMOND E. MOON

CHRISTOPHER G. MOORE

REINALDO MORE

GREG MOREY

DEBBIE MORRIS

JEFFERY B. MORRIS

SCOTT MORRISON

CHARLIE MOSS

PAT MOSS

JOSLYN MOUCH

GORDON W. MOUGHON

BONNIE CAROL MOULTON

THOMAS MURDICK

CAROLINE MULLEN

ANN MULLER

COLLEEN MUNDS

JEANETTE MURDOCK

FRANK MURPHY

RANDY MUSE

JANIS MYER

ROBERT MYERS

JACK NAFTEL

ti 4

PAGE 40 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

,11 VN I.. \ \M\
M MIK «. NKKUHAM
I) VM» M. >KIL
•ATHY NELSON

GEORGE D. NELSON. .JH.
VIRGINIA F. NELSON
ALBERT V. NELTHROPP
HARRIETT NETTLES

nON NEWCOMB

WILLI \M S. NEWSOM, III

JILIANNK MCE

SCOT! MfHOLAS

HOOPER NICHOLS

RONNIE NIERMAN

SUSAN E. NILES
SLELLEN NIXON
MARILYN NOBILE
GREGORY J. NOLAN
JLLIE A. NORMAN-
JIM NORRIS

EDWARD NORVELL
CHERYL D. NOVAK
JOHN M. OBERG
ANN H. o'BRIEN
CHARLES o'BRIEN
MARIA I. o'BYRNE

john o hearn
john c. oldfield
<;erry o'leary
peter m. oleck
don \ld oliver

DEBOR VH OLnXRA

STLART L. OLNEY-
PETER o'MALLEY
KENNETH OPAT
PAl L M. ORDOCNE
CI RRIE OVERBY
ROBERT \ OWEN

TOM OWEN
VNNK I.. PACKER

M \n\ n. p vrKER

ALLVN S. PADAWER
CATHY PAINE

JOSE PVNnv

/ PAGE 41

JAMES PANIPINTO

CATHERINE S. PANNILL

FRANCES PAPPAS

MARIA A. PARADELO

PAM PARDUE

PAMELA C. PARKER

ISABEL B. PARKS

JANIE PARTIN

SUZY PASCH

L. CISSY PASS

WILEY A. PATTERSON

HELEN C. PATTISON

WILLIAM T. PAULL, JR.
PAUL W. PAUSTIAN, JR.

ALBERT PAVY
JOHN B. PAYNE

SHARON PEARHNE

CRAIG S. PEARLMAN

ROBERT S. PEARSON

STEVEN S. PEDEN

CRAIG PEDERSEN

JANE C. PEELER

if'

^Bjt

LANDON C. PENN

^' "^

READ PENSON

WH -^

EDITH S. PEPPER

LIZABETH PEPPO

E. S. PERRETCK

LEILA PERRIN

PAULA A. PERRONE

GAIL PERRY

L. DELIA PERRY

JOANNE PESSA

BARBARA A. PETERSON

MARY M. PFLUMM

MARY C. PHILIPS

SIDNEY H. PHILLIPS, JR.

ERAN PICKENS

KEENAN PICKERT

MILLIE PILIE

MICHAEL PINNOLIS

■i

l^'a

PAGE 42 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

( If

i^^ ^

.V a<->

I ItlstvN I'lNZON

noimi I'iSAN

IIAKIIMIA N. PISANKO
ll\l(l(\I(\ PITTS
KMIIKIIINK I'LAlCIli
MAFtV PLALtHE

« UIU^TOPUKR POLIZZI
DKIIOKAIi POLLACK
MKVK POLLARD
>Vn.I.IAM n. POPE
( I.Ari)L\ POTTS
THOMAS POUNDS, JR.

<.>iK(; powF.i.i.

.10 V\ POWKI.L

M vm HELEN POWELL

KICKY POWELL

EI>I>IE PRATT

«;aIL PRATT

KENT S. PRATT
WILLLVM H. PRATT
MONTY PREISER
PATRICIA C. PRESCOTT
CLAIDI PRICE
NED PRICE

jane pritchard
:marcia prosser
a. pall protos

BOBBIE PROVOSTi'

PATRICIA PRIETT
ANN QIVVE
■VI VI KEEN (11 EBEDAU
M AKK W. yiH;LEV

PVTKICK J. QIINLIVAN
M VH^ KADFORD
KI( II Vltl) RAFES
KKNEK KVFFALOVICH

STEPHANIE RAGLAND
< \llKOLL n. RALEY
I \l <,)l F R WIEY
JOHN HA-VIIREZ

/ PAGE 43

ELAINE RAPHAEL

JEFF RAPOPORT

STEVE RAPPEPORT

ROBERT RASKIN

LINDA RASPOLICH

RICHARD K. RATHBUN

AIDA RAVERTA

BECKY RAY

DAN RAYMOND

RANDY READ

ANNE REARDON

DEIBY O. REELE

BARBARA REGENSTEIN

W. H. REINBOLD

JOHN REINSCH

HOWARD REISMAN

JEROME REPHAN

IRVEN RESNICK

PATRICIA RICH

PATRICIA RICHARD

CATHERINE RICHARDSON

DEBORAH A. RICHARDSON

ARNOLD RICHER

JERRY RICHMAN

SARAH I. RICHTER

MARY RICKARD

JOHN RIGNEY

DEBORAH J. ROBERTSON

DANA ROBINSON

NEIL H. ROBINSON

GREGG ROCK

CAMILLE A. ROGERS

LOUISA ROGERS

JOHN L. ROKOVICH

MARLEEN S. ROOSTH

GAY ROPER

SHARON ROSE

CATHERINE ROSEN

J^jgj^ ' ' r-*>-

PETER ROSENBAUM

ELLEN ROSENBLOOM

HENRY B. ROSENTHAL

GARY ROSMARIN

PAGE 44 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

STKVE ROSNER

C AM>V HOS!i

KAIUAHINK ROSS

C.K.N KKN <:. ROTH

SrSA.V ROZANSKI

JODY ALAN HLbE.NSTEIN

JEFFREY RIBI.N
SANDRA Rl KIN
BEMTA Rl BINETT
EILEEN Rl BMTZ
MirilAEI. H. HLDEEN
ANN RLDOLPH

PETER A. RIST
JOHN G. RUTH
DIAN L. RYAN
JOHN F. RYAN
RANDY RYAN
JAMES SAADI

DEBORAH A. SABALOT
MELAME SALE
THOMAS SALYER
SUE SALZ

PATRICIA SAMMONS
KAY SAMPSON"
MAUREEN SAMUELS
STEPHEN" SAMUELS

VICKI SAMUELS
SCOTT SAMUELSON"
ANA MARIA SANCHEZ
ROBIN K. SANDACE
MARTHA SANDERS
BRUCE SANDERSON"

DIANE SANDERSON
CHRISTINE M. SANTHIN
JAMES D. SATROM
JACK SAUL
LINDA J. SAUL
ANN SAVAGE

PHILIP A. SAVOIE
SALLIE A. SCAN LAN
JOHN SCARPINATO
MITCHELL SCHACK
FREDERICK SCHATTMAN
CATHY SCHATZ

/ PAGE 45

PETER SCHAUMBERG

SAMMIE SCHENKER

MITCHELL SCHER

HAROLD SCHERR

BOR SCHIESS

STEVEN SCHIFF

FREDRIC C. SCHLESINGER

KATHERINE SCHNEIDAU

DAVID SCHIVELL

MARY ELLEN SCHOENBERGER

STEVEN H. SCHOENBERGER

KENNETH SCHUBB

LITT SCHULINGKAMP

MARTHA SCHULL

MARTIN A. SCHULTZ

STEPHEN SCHULZ

J. STEPHEN SCHUSTER

PAT SCHUSTER

S. SCOTT SCHWAB

JULIE SCHW^AM

MAURI SCHWARTZ

PHILLIP H. SCHWARTZ

LYNNE SCHWOTZER

MARY LOIS SCOFIELD

ISABEL S. SCOTT

ROSALYN ANITA SCOTT

CYNTHIA SEALE

MELVIN SEARS

SAMUEL I. SEHNERT

ALLAN SEIBEL

RICHARD A. SELAKOVICH

MARTHA SELLERS

CAROL SELONICK

ANDI SERVOS

DEBORAH SHACKLETON

SARA SHACKLETON

LAWRENCE B. SHAFFER, III

MARY JO SHAFFER

JAN SHANHOUSE

STEPHEN SHANKS

RUTH SHAPIRO

DONALD SHARP

DICK SHARPSTEIN

BEN SHAW

CLAUDE SHAW

JOSEPH L. SHEA

JIMMY SHEATS

STEVEN SHELLEY

PAGE 46 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

LEOPOLD SHER
SIIAHT SIIERiriAN
I. \l HKI. SIIKKMA>
IlKIIIlIK Mlf.KKII.L
VI( lOHIA SIIKKUOL'SE
KENNETH SHINBAL'M

.lElNETTE n. sHIPMAN
■VIARV SII.VEHMAN
HDIJERT SIMEONE
VMTA SIMMONS
<.V\ SI'M'MONS
KONA l>. SIMMONS

/ pm;F 4-7

STEVE SIMONE

SUSAN A. SIMONTON

MICHAEL T. SIMPSON

SALLY SIMPSON

BRENDA SIMS

LAWRENCE J. SINDEL

GLENN SINGER

CAROL SIR

TIM SLAUGHTER

NANCY A. SLOAN

SCOTT SLONIM

JOSEPH M. SMAZAL

ANDREW M, SMITH

ARTHUR C. SMITH

CARL M. SMITH

DARNISE MARIE SMITH

DIANE SMITH

EUGENIA E. SMITH

JAMES F. SMITH

KATIE SMITH

MARLIVE SMITH

NANCY SMITH

PAXTON J. SMITH

ROBERT M. SMITH

WILLIAM R. SMITH

BETTY SMOLKIN

HELEN E. SNEED

MARILYN SNOOK

ERNEST C. SNOW, JR.

GLEN G. SOBEY

SARAH JANE SOGIN

DANIEL SOKOLOFF

BETTY SOLNIK

BARRY SOMERSTEIN

JANICE SOMMERS

DAVID C. SOROE

JOEL SOROSKY

KAREN I. SOTO

MARY SCOT SPAAR

JEFFERSON SPANN

PETER SPANN

GLENN SPEAR

DON SPECK

JOHN SPENCE

RALPH SPINDOLA

JOHN M. SPOTTSWOOD, JR.

CAROL SQUARCY

CHRIS STEED

mj m

' — -

^^V'^

^ ^

K" .

PAGE 48 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

KO.^ALIE STLELE

STANLEY H. STEIN

A HUE STEI.M.E

MIKE VIEHN

PEr;(,V JEANNE STERNBERCER

EMILY STEVENS

ALICE STEVENSON
BARBARA STEWART
fllAHI.ES STEWART
l*ATRI(.I\ STEWART
IMUSriLLA STEWART
JOAN STILLMAN

LINDA STINNETT
MARY LEE STINSON
NANCY E. STOCKBRIDCE
BEN STOKELEY
CAROL RLTH STONE
JIMMY STONE

MARK STONECIPHER
MARCO STOWERS
ELLEN STRAVS
RICK STREXFFER
GARY STRELAL
MARK STRIDER

JIM STROHM
SHEELAH STRONG
JILL STIART
ROBERTA STUART

HARRY W. SlLLnAN, JR.
RETT SlLLrVAN
ERIC T. SWANSON
RACHAEL SWEIG

DEAN SWEITZER
KARIN SWENSON
JACK D. SWETLAND
DE DE SWIFT

ANNE TALBOT
\RTni R TALLEY
t AMPnEIl TALLY
GRFC TVMBLYN
ESTHER TVNNENBAIM
LEON TARANTO

/ P\CE 49

GIN TAYtOR

HUGH TAYLOR

JANET TAYLOR

SUZANNE E. TAYLOR

BECKY TEETER

CLIFFORD TEICH

BILL TEMPLETON

C. LAUCHLIN TENCH

ROBB S. TENNANT

TIMMY T. TERREBONNE

CATHY TERRY

SEAN TERRY

RICHARD A. THALHEIM, JR.

THOMAS R. THIBODEAUX

DOUGLAS THIEL

THOMAS M. THIELE

STAN THOMAS

HOLLY THOMISON

JAMES E. THOMPSON

KRISTINA THOMPSON

DON THORNBERRY

JAMES D. THRASHER

ANDY TITEN

PAM TITLE

KATHRYN TOMBERLIN

RONALD TOMPKINS

LYNNE TORBERT

ARLENE TORBIN

WILLIAM I. TOUPS

SUSAN TOTZKE

CRAIG S. TRAMPIER

WARREN E. TRASK

MARY MARGARET TRAXLER

STANLEY TREITLER

ORRIN M. TROUM

PETE TSCHUMI

WILLIAM L. TUCKER

BRENDA TUDOR

LINDA TUERO

NOREL TULLIER

jK^ 4(rM

K''

PAGE 50 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

JOAN r. TLLLMAN
HKHT TLRNER
MARY A. TIRNER
I'HII.IP TIRNKR
MARTHA TIRRE.NTINE
JANET LDE.N

BRECK ULE
MARV LMLAND
DAVID INCER
ANNE VADEN
Jf)E \ AMGORSKY
LLtlE VAN METER

TAMARA VANNOY
MICHAEL VARCON
K. NEIL VAICHAN
VIRGIL C. VALGHAN
LESLIE VENNERS
STEVE G. VENTLRATOS

GLESE ANN VERLANDER

WAYNE VIAL

MARY MARGARET VIATOR

STEPHEN C. VOSS

STEVE WADE

THOMAS D. WADE

GEORGE WAGNER
J. MARK WAGNER
MARTIN WAGNER
WADE WAGISEPACK
CHARLES R. WALDRON
CONNIE WALKER

ERIC WALLACE

J (IF WALLACE

M\RV ELLEN WALLACE

J \NET WALLER

SANDRA WALLICK

WENDY WALLNER

/ PAGE 51

MAUREEN WALSH

VANNA WARMACK

WILLIAM P. WATSON

PENN WAUGH

JULIA J. WEBB

BETH WEBER

JOHN WEBRE

WILLIAM H. WEBSTER

STEVE WEHRLE

PAUL WEIDENFELD

ALICE WEIL

KENNETH C. WEIL

JAMES WEINACKER

GUY L. WEINBERG

BARRY WEINER

MICHAEL WEINSTOCK

ANN WEISLER

GARY WEISS

BONNIE WEITZENKORN

GORDON WELLER

JOHN S. WELLES

ANDREW WELLS

BRUCE WELLS

JOY WELLS

SAYRA WELLS

CONNIE WERNER

MELINDA WEST

MARINA Y. WESTERSTROM

JUDY WESTON

ELIZABETH WETZEL

PAULA S. WEXLER

SUSAN WEXLER

RONALD WHEAT

JEDDA WHITE

ANNE WHITED

LOYD WHITLEY

lONE WHITLOCK

BECKY WHITTEN

KENDRICK O. WHITTINGTON

DOUGLAS M. WIEDER

HEATHER WIGGINS

ROBERT V. WIGGINS

PAGE 52 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates

A LAN P. K. WILD
A.NDV WII.K
A.NC;ELA WILKES
LEE T. WILKERSON
l(I( HARD WILKOF
UAMU M. WILLIAMS

DEBBIK WILLIAMS
IRVI> J. WILLIAMS
LIZ WILLIAMS

GEORGE T. WILLIAMSON
NANCY SCOTT WILLIAMSON
CLARENCE L. WILLIS. Ill

THEON WILSON
DIANE WINGO
BARRY WINN

DIANA WINOKER

KEITH M. WTSM.\R

BRIAN S. WTTKOV

LOLTSE WOLF

RITA WOLFF

MARY FREIDA WOLFSON

JOAN WOLKIN
DAVIS WOODS
BRANDON WOOL

LIZA WRIGHT
RICHARD W1-DE
MARC YELLIN

JOANNE YIANILOS
MKI YIAMLOS
SYLVIA J. YOING
MATTHEW ZALE
CHARLEY ZEANAH
KATHIMARIE ZEMANN

M>RA ZILAHY
RANDAL ZIPSER
SHKRRY ZOX
MINTA S. ZILKEY
WAYNE ZWICK
MIKE D. ZYGMINT

/ PAGE 53

GARY LEE ADAMS/ UNIV. OF YORK

LINDA J. ALTENBERG/ UNIV. OF PARIS

GARY E. BAIR/ UNIV. OF HULL

RHONDA J. BALDINGER/ UNIV. OF SOUTHHAMPTON

GARY M. banks/ QUEEN MARY COL.

EDWARD R. HERMAN/ UNIV. COL. LONDON

ARTHUR S. BERNSTEIN/ BEDFORD COL.

LEE K. BOOCKER/ LONDON SCHOOL OF ECON. & POL. SC.

WILLIAM D. BRIZZEE/UNIV. OF HAMBURG
DEBRA KAYE BROWN/ UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL

MICHAEL F. BRUTON/UNIV. OF GLASGOW
JANICE L. BUCHSTANE/ UNIV. OF PARIS

DON A. BUKSTEIN/uNIV. OF SHEFFIELD
THOMAS H. BURGUIERES/uNIV. COL. LONDON

MARY SUE CAMPBELL/uNIV. OF LIVERPOOL
DENIS A. CLEGG/UNIV. OF BIRMINGHAM

PAGE 54 / A. & S., Engineering, and Newcomb J.Y.A. Undergraduates

^ik

I.INDA K. fOFFFH/lMV. f)F PAFUS

.ia<;k k. coiien/ iMv. <»j heading

DIANA SUE COPEI-ANo/yiEEN MARY COL.
JAMES M. CITSHAW/lMV. fOI.. LONDON

DONNA A. DALFEHES/l NIV. OF MADRID
CARLOS DE LA VEGa/lNIV. OF PARIS
ETTA JANE DOVITH/iMV. OF MANCHESTER
JOAN SYDNEY ENGLAND/ L NIV. OF MADRID

GAIL FEINBERC/lNIV. OF BRISTOL

MICHAEL F. FINK/i NIV. OF BRISTOL

STEVEN M. FISCHER/ IMV. OF MANCHESTER

ARTHUR G. GRIMSAL/WALES & MONMOITHSHIRF ' VRDIFF

EDMUND S. cross/ UNIV. COL. OF WALES ABERYSWYTH
KENNETH W. HVGAN/iMV. OF H VMBURG
DEBORAH A. II\WKI>s/lMV. OF T VRIS
BARBARA JO HEI>l/lNIV. OF >.HEFFIELD

^Ji\h

KAREN M. heller/ INIV. OF P \RIS

WIIIIVAT M. nFMETFn/lNn. OK SOI THH\MPTON

JON. K. H<Htlls/lM\. OK inKKI'MOI

<.FK\III II. JOHNSON/ I MN. COI . OF SWANSEA

PACE 33

SHIRLEY C. KIRKCONNELL/UIVIV. OF BIRMINGHAM

DAVID H. KLINGENSMITH/uNIV. OF PARIS

ERLING LARSON, IIl/UNIV. COL. OF NORTH WALES, BANGOR

JAMES W. LEATHERMAN/UNIV. OF ABERDEEN

JAMES A. LINDERMAN/uNIV. COL. OF SWANSEA

SCOTT G. MARKOFF/uNIV. OF PARIS

BRIAN J. MARKS/UNIV. OF EAST ANGLIA

TIMOTHY A. MARKUS/UNIV. OF PARIS

JAMES M. MCCREADY/UNIV. OF PARIS

WILLIAM F. MCDONNELL/ UNIV. OF SUSSEX

PAULA JEAN MCKENZIE/ IMPERIAL COL.

MICHELE AMME METZ/uNIV. of PARIS

JOE elkins moore/westfield col.

PHYLLIS M. POTTERFIELD/UNIV. OF NOTTINGHAM
FRED D. prentice/ UNIV. OF HULL
JOHN W. RANKIN/ UNIV. OF LEEDS

KALMON M. RENOV/UNIV. OF READING

MARK E. REYNOLDS/ UNIV. OF WARWICK

RALPH Z. RICHARD/ UNIV. OF EDINBURGH

JEAN E. RIOPELLE/ UNIV. OF PARIS

PAGE / 56 A. & S., Engineering, and Newcomb J.Y.A. Undergraduates

/ 1

' f

f <;i.KN.N I. HONES/UNIV. OK KDINIil R(;|I

CATII^ SUE SALIMAN/i M\. OI I'VIIIS

ROBIN C. SILVER/l'MV. OF MADRID

KATHY S. SLOCOMBE/LMV. OF ST. ANDREWS
DAVID A. SLOSKY/lMV. OF LEEDS
EDRIE B. SOWELL/uNIV. OF PARIS
JANIE M. stone/ tNTV. OF PARIS

BARBARA LYNN VAN EATON'/ LONDON SCHOOL OF ECON. &

POL. SC.

MICHAEL G. ward/ LNIV. OF BIRMINGHAM

i^W\^ v' PATRICIA J. WATSON/LNIV. OF WALES ABERY
Y^ *^i JERRY W. WEBSTER/ LNIV. OF LEEDS

STWATH

RICHARD H. WEISLER/ INIV. OF GLASGOW
WILLIA^l H. wheeler/ IMV. OF P VRIS

KATHIE LOl WILLIAMS/lMV. OF M VOHIll
MICHAEL WOSCOBOINIK/i NIV. OF PARIS

/ PAGE 57

Chemical
Engineering

ARNOLD FERGUSON / 1

E. A. MAUTERER, III / 2

DAVID FONTAINE, III / 3

HUGH MCCLAIN / 4

REINALDO CASTELLO-VARGAS / 5

MIKE FARNELL / 6

JOHN MORRIS / 7

SAMUEL TILDEN / 8

CARLOS SAUREZ / 9

PAUL MALLON / 10

MARK EVERS / 11

FINESSED:
VINCENT PROVENZA

PAGE 58 / Engineering Seniors

Civil
Engineering

1 / CHRIS SHERIDAN

2 / JOHN GRAY

3 / BIFF BLRK

4 / MIKE ENGLER

5 / WARD PIRDUM

6 / MA'IT ANDERSON

7 / JACK LABORDE

8 / III GH BLAIN

9 / DIDLEY RICHTER

10 / DOl'G WILLIAMS

11/ JOE «;endron

12 / TONY FRI<;iLS

l.'i / int. JOHN MKLAl'S

11 / "rHE < HIEF." WALTER BLESSEY
1.1 / «;eRRY HANAFY

16 / WILL CHARBONNET
I 7 / STEVE WALTON
\i\ I JOE CALI
I*) / IMC H DISAN<;

20 / MIKE HEIN

21 / STEVE LEBLANC

1M)F.TEBMINANT:

<;ynthia
john flanagan
ron >icginnis
j»»h> stewart

STEVE HIFFMAN

1948-1971

/ PAGE 59

Electrical Engineering

Hfini'^^' \m

10 1

^ r

^\fim

) S

(M ur

T^-

' V-S?i '^ A

/^ \

/i5 ^ n /

(V/'

11.

f\ vl'^'k

')%

/ ib \

Vv.

U^j/ I"* }

IMli

ERNIE CESPEDES / 1

TOM PLANCHARD / 2

DAVID PEREZ / 3

MIKE BOLTON / 4

DAN GARCIA / 5

WAYNE JOHNSON / 6

TOM SMITH / 7

JOEL PENICK / 8

TILDEN CHILDS / 9

T.H.E. DOUBLE 'e' SHAFT / 10

BILL MCCRAY / 11

LANSING EVANS / 12

LEON PESSES / 13

JULIAN KOCH / 14

TOM LAZA / 15

DAVID CASTANON / 16

ROBERT MENDOW / 17

JOHN KRUPSKY / 18

I.E.E.E. OFFICERS / 19

IN THE LAGOON:

GEORGE PLAKOTOS

VICTOR WALZ

PAGE 60 / Engineering Seniors

ROGER SCHR,\i\II\I / 1

DOUG GROG AN / 2

DANIEL LEWIS / 3

DAVII) MILES / 4

IVIICHAEL COBO / .1

CHRIS CHURCH / 6

TKI) SILVKK / 7

WALTER LA^IIA / 8

DOUGLAS ROBINSON / 9

M0H«;AN JONES / 10
RICHARD WAVELL / 11

MOONLICIITINC:
ROBERT (;REENE
ROBERT HYMAN

STEVE ki:mble

JIM KOONTZ
RICHARD STRAIN

c:-.:jst-i^^mmT~\, .-.*

Engineering Curriculum

JOHN MUELLER / 1

HUGH MANSON / 2

TOM TWIFORD. JR. / 3

CARV CO>IARDA / 4

CARR LEE FLETCHER / 5

LUIS MALDONADO / 6

JIMMY Y VRTER / 7

GERALD <:1IAMPAGNE / 8

DUDLEY SMITH / 9

III <;il I ri.I.ER / 10

MAURY riCIIELOUPE / 11

PHILLIP SUTHERLAND/ 12

TED LONG / 13

ItWDY CASSERLEIGII / 14

l> TlIK SHOP:

riM III "VIATEL

ROBERT Kl BLANDER

LESTER PALLISER. JR.

DENNIS RIDDLE

STEVE SZYAllRSKI

JOHN WUST. JR.

Mechanical Engineering

/ P VCF 61

JOHN GARNET ABBOTT

JERRY F. ADAMS

ROBBIE J. ADAMS

CHRIS ALBRECHT

THOMAS E. ALLISON

CHARLES AMANN

DONALD ASPELUND

ASHTON B, AVENGO

JEFF AYCOCK

MATT BAKER

FRED A. BASHA

EVERETT L. BEASLEY, JR.

ART BECKER

FREDERICK L. BELL

ALAN BEYCHOK

JOHN BIVONA

MOHAMED SADIK BIZANTI

PHIL BOOGAERTS, JR.

WILLIAM H. BRUNDIGE

WILLIAM J. BURKETT

PETER CALI

WILLIAM W. CAMERON

THOMAS A. CANALE

VIC CARRIERE

ANTOINE CHALHOUB

CRAIG CHANEY

JOHN CHERAMIE

RICHARD B. CLARK

VICTOR C. CRANE

EILEA CRUMP

JOSEPH CUTRO

JOHN CVEJANOVICH

MOHAMED DAHAB

JAMES DALY

GORDON S. DANN

KENT B. DAVEY

OMEER C. DAVIS

LEO DIBENEDETTO

DENNIS DUCOTE

JAC DUDENHEFER

DOUGLAS V. DUVIGNEAUD

DAVID EBERT

PAGE 62 / Engineering Undergraduates

M MU.IAI. FAf;iO
JOHN L. FEGLEY
KOIX.KR FIKI.nS
IIKIUIKKT <.. flSIIKR

Dvv \. fi.a>ac;a>

MI* IIAKI. KfXiARTy

KO.N (.ASH«»
FRA>K A. CEISEL
DAVE GERSTENGERGER
DE.VMS GIESEMANN
HFGHAKr) T. GI.\M\NO
JAMES B. GODWIN, III

DAVID GRIENER
CLIFTON E. GRIM, HI
G. BRLCE GRIMES
GARY B. GRISHAM
FRED GRLBISS
RONNIE GLZMAN

JOHN M. HARLAN, JR.
JOSEPH T. HARMLTH, III
GLENNON J. HARRISON
DAVID HEBERT
ANTHONY C. HENRIQIEZ
NICHOLAS HERNANDEZ

DARJIYL J. HICKMAN
RICHARD HIRSCH
JEFF HODGES
REX M. HOLMLIN
DANIEL HOM
DALE HUNN

GEORGE INDEST
JOHN JAMES
PERRY >V. JENNINGS
JERRY WAYNE KEEL

THOMAS KENNA
TANVEER SAMI KHAN
W. A. KLEIN
MICHAEL ALLAN KNAPP

nORERT P. LACLEDE
DAVID LANDRY
JAMES B. LANE
DAVID I.ANGSTO:<

/ PACE 63

MICHAEL F. LARKIN

GARY LARSEN

DOUGLAS R. LAWRENCE

HENRY LEE

THOMAS LEE

CARL LEEDY

ROBERT A. LEESON, JR.

JOHN LOCANTRO, III

JOHN T. MAHONEY, JR.

ROBERT W. MAHOOD

JOHANNES J. MARKUS

BEN MARTIN

ARTHUR MARTINEZ, JR.

CARLOS MATA

BRYAN S. MC GINNIS

JOHN MELLO

ROLANDO MENENDEZ

CHARLES L. MOORE

RICHARD J. MOSS

ROBERT JAMES MOTCHKAVITZ

JAMES B. MULLIS, III

WAYNE NAIMOLI

DANIEL R. NASH

CARLOS NEUARES

PETER NEWHOUSE

MICHAEL S. NOBLE

CORT O'BRIEN

JACOB PLICQUE

LAWRENCE OERLING

ALAN ORKIN

JOHN ORR

JAMES ORTH

WILLIAM PAYER

JAMES L. PERREIN

LOUIS JOS PETRIE

H. PICARDI

BRUCE I. PRINTZ

HARRY F. QUARLS

GARY QUENAN

MICHAEL L. RACHELSON

DON M. RANDOLPH, II

GARY W. RAUBER

PHILLIP W. RAUSER

DENNIS V. RAYMOND

ALI RIAHI

GEORGE ROBINSON

WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ, JR.

LEON J. ROGERS

(^^^^ F-^ ^/

PAGE 64 / Engineering Undergraduates

S. MARK HOWE
STEPHKN SAI.LMAN
.JIMMY I,. SAN MARTIN

ERIC SAWYER

WILLIAM D. SEILING, JR.

ROBERT SILVERMAN

DAVID M. SIMS
WILLIAM SLOAN
SANDER SMILES

ED SMITH

JAMES A. STANCZAK

SAMUEL J. STOKES, HI

MIGUET A. SLAU
DANIEL J. SULLrVAN
MARK SYTtOR.A
LEE TERRELL
BARNELL J. THIBODEAl-X
MALRICE G. THIELE, JR.

CHRISTOPHER J. TIMKEN
LARRY P. TOIPS
STEPHEN A. TROXLER
JOHN TURNER
ROBBERT W. VORHOFF
JOSEPH WALL

GEORGE M. WEBB. JR-
ALAN S. WEBER
DAVin E. WEIDNER
W. n. WEIDNER
THOMAS W. WEST
WARREN W. WHITE. JR.

GORDON >IILLER WIECAND, H

STEVE WOLFE

FELIPE WOLL

JOHN VOING

OTIS WINGO YOING. JR.

MARK ZEITVOGEL

/ PAGE 65

PAGE 66 / Computer Center

/ PAGE 67

-TV 1-

»1^':«

PAGE 68 / EteLTA Regional Primate Research Center

/ PACE 69

Anthropology

SEATED :

DAVID POTTER

JACQUELYN DAY

JOHN CARROLL

ALTHEA TESSIER

KAY HUDSON

BRENDA SAUNDERS

MALCOLM SHUMAN

STANDING:

MAURICE ONWOOD

CURTIS BUCK

DALE REES

DON DONHAM

JEANNE EVANS

NEWELL WRIGHT

JACK SAUNDERS

PAGE 70 / Graduate School

vKATFIl:

H Mill \II \ AMIKKSON

STAMIINC:

PROF. DONALD ROBERTSON

f.i:r»Rf;F. mani>zv< k

ItOC.KR i.RKKN

SI SAN lURKNIIM'M

HANABA >Tl NN

PROF. (; VK<:iI.IA DAVIS

TKRRY SI.M^IONS

PROF. JE.SSIE POESCH

M \!n I.Ol ISE HENDERSON

< Anoi. <;o^in»;ton

I.IRKING AT DF.I.CADO:

SI SAN GRADY

•MARY KLAASEN

>IARY LAWSON PENDLETON

LINDA MILLER

Art/History

Art Studio

FRONT:

BILL MCCLARY-
STEPHEN LOWRY
WILLIAM SELANDER

MIDDLE:
DELAN BLSH
HAROLD SWAYDER
JESSEE POIMOELF
MART POLDMETS

BACK:

DEMSE Y'ALLON
MICHAEL O'BRIEN
PATRICIA JESSEE
SAM JOHNSON
ALBERT H. SMITH, JR.
STEPHEN WILSON
JOANN CREENBERC
ROBERT PARKS

Ll-RKINC ELSEWHERE:

SISTER SANDRA ARDOY'NE

ROBERT EVANS

JACK GATES

ROBERT LEWIS

RI< HM«1ND STIBBS

LINDA WALKER

/ PAGE 71

FRONT HOW:

DR. ARTHUR WELDEN

JOYCE VERRETT

DR. RICHARD LUMSDEN

DR. ALFRED SMALLEY

BARBARA CLARKE

DR.

SECOND ROW:

DR. JOHN SEED

DR. RICHARD MILLS

WILLIAM MCDONALD

KENNETH ROUX

TBIBD ROW:

EDWIN POWELL

LINDA VACCA

DR. ROBERT GROOVER

JOHN CONNER

♦

FOURTH ROW:

JOYCE LEVINGSTON

DR. ERIK ELLGAARD

DR. DENNIS NEW

DENNIS DUPLANTIER

FIFTH HOW:

JUDY ZETTERGREN

FLORENCE ROSE

LESLIE ZETTERGREN

STANDING:

DR. E. PETER VOLPE

DR. JOHN BARBER

AUSTIN FITZJARRELL

JAMES TURPEN

CLAUDIA DEGRUY

DR. JOAN BENNETT

DR. S. MERYL ROSE

GERALD DOLLAR

CARL MOHRHERR

DR. MERLE MIZELL

PHILLIP MOUNT

Biology

PAGE 72 / Graduate School

Chemistry

SEATED:

ACHYIT KIKADE
MICHAEL KEENAN
WILLIAM THORN
EDWARD GAVSE
MOHI>DER CHATTHA
MARY FRANCES WINKLER
SHIRLEY YANG
SHEIE Lf
JIN-RONG CHANG
HAVEN SCOTT ALDRICH
MILO HASSLOCK

STANDING:
CARL DOIMIT
EDITH ONG
VRAJESH TIWARI
SI NG-PING CHEN
ROBERT VIGNES
PETER LOSAVIO
EDWARD DAVIS
ROBERT BENNO

INOnCANIC :

GWENDOLYN MORRIS
TIMOTHY R0<;ERS
JOHN WILLIAMS
HEIT-KENG YEH

DR. JOE POE
MATT HOGAN
BRUCE SNYDER
LISA COVINGTON
BRIAN MORAN

Classics

Economics

MARY MALCHOW
DONALD KEMP
JULES LEBON III
PETER JACXSENS
MASAHIKO HORIE
JAIME POMBO
HANS FLICKENSCHILD
OLIVER HORD

PAGE 74 / Graduate School

'uiT^I v.-i.<^e^>: --i->c.,-*^'>.v,««rt'-:'^i»».

Education

/ PACE 75

WANDA SAKOWSKI
DR. WEBER DONALDSON
VIRGINIA TICE
NELL BORAH
MARY MARQUARDSEN
HOLLY MORGAN
LUCILLE BOILARD
BETH MOUNT
CAROL TELFORD
MERRIT BLAKESLEY
BONNIE KELLER
STEPHEN KATZ
SUSAN FITCH
JOE LACOUR
SANDY MUTINA
MARGARET ROSE
MARILYN WOLF
EILEEN o'NEIL
LYNN FRANK
KAREN JANSSEN

PARMI LES ABSENTS:
SANS NAHNYBIDA
JEAN RUELLO
STEPHANIE SIGAL
MARIE LOUISE RAPHALEN
ROSS DONNELLY
JOANN KLING
BECKY CLOUDMAN

English

LARRY NORWOOD

DIANA DUVALL

CHRISTINE MORTENSEN

DAN PHILLIPS

DAVID ARNETT

LOUIS BAUGNON

ALICIA ALDAYA

REV. JAMES HURLEY

ALICE RUSBAR

DR. PURVIS E. BOYETTE

BARBARA MELITZ

RICHARD MARSHALL

French and Italian

PAGE 76 / Graduate School

Geology

LUCY PERROIV
RUSSELL GODWIN
SUSAN OGDEN
NORMAN KEUL
DIANE KUIVIPF
AUBREY FORD
GENE BARR
ROBERT DEWELL
HEIDI HEADLEY
GLENN DELATTE
BOBBY POARCH

NICHT IM DAS PHOTO:
MARIELnSE CHAMPAGNE
DWIGHT LANGSTON
ANN MARTIN
ALBERT FINK
BRIGITTE MAY
DIANA NEWTON
MICHAEL NIEBERGER
WILLIAM ODOM
SAMUEL OSBORNE
WERNER SCHROEDER
.1. T. THORNTON

COfNTERCLOCKWlSE :

BILL WILBERT

DR. RONALD PARSLEY

DR. H. E. YOKES

MANDY HUNT

LORILEE MCDOWELL

JOHN MCDOWELL

KRISHNA KUMAR ROY

H. C. SKINNER

DR. HAMILTON JOHNSON

NOEL ANDRESS

JOACHIM MEYER

ELLY ROLAF

JIM EDISON

SCOTT SN^TIER

W. L. WELLS

MANECK G. CHICHGAR

WILLIAM E. DAUGHDRILL

German

/ PAGE 77

History

Latin

American

Studies

SEATED:

KATHY DYER (M.A.T. )

RUDOLPH HAMMACK

STANDING:

ARTHUR WHITE

NANCY F. ANDERSON

RAYMOND NUSSBAUM

GERALD CARPENTER

ROCER SUBLITT

ANDERSON CHILD

PAPPY

SYLVIA FREY

TRACY ROMERO ( M.A.T. )

WILLIAM L. HOGAN

TOM FIEHRER

DON COERVER

HILDA TEN BRINK (L.A.S. )

TONY BRUTON

ERIC GORDON

JAMES RAMSEY ( L.A.S. )

SEATED:

MARILLA FURCOLOW

DR. ALBERT VAZQUEZ

DR. RICHARD GREENLEAF

NANCY WINGATE

STANDING:

JOHN EVANS

BEN AGUIRRE

PHILLIP THOMPSON

SISI DI LAURA

JOHN CUNNINGHAM

KATHLEEN GAMBLE

LOIS VENDITTO

JANET BENDER

SHELLEY BOWEN

LARRY BOYER

ANNE ARNOLD

CYNTHIA SMITH

LANNY JOHNSON

ON A SLOW BOAT:

OLIVIA P. KEETH

EILEEN KIRK

MARY C. STRETCH

HILDA TEN BRINK

PAGE 78 / Graduate School

Mathematics

SEATED;

PATRICK KELLEY MEEHAN

WILLrAM WILFONG

JOHN YUAN

JOE HENDRICKSON

LARRY CAMPBELL

BILL JONES

STA>'DI?fG:

MIKE VON KlILENBERC
PETER DEPAEPE
ALONSON TAKAHASHI
BRINO WICHNOSKI
ROGER TISHLER
DAVID WALLACE
DIETRICH HELMER
TUCKER HATHORN
GUS GINSBURG
FRITZ KRAUSS

Music

SEATED:

nONME ZAKOTNIK
( II \KLES RLANCy
JOHN JOYCE

STA>DI>C:
WILMWI M \Y
(.KR\I niNK HI nnELL
KI.IZVIIKI'H S(HWARZ
P VTRK I V WOOnvRD
KITH FALCON
THOMAS RUSHING

I>' THE PIT:

itKTi^ III. vn<:q

H) HHOl SSVRD
I I IsK < \MIMJN
l)\\ II) DKVI'KR
M VR^ H\T(HFTTE

WAVNF iionns

■M VKGARET JOHNSON
H\V 1.1 PER
slSAN M( ni FFEE
KLLEN PI.VTVMONE
(.1 VMNETT\ PI.l >IMER

M vin i(>rtorh:h

/ PACE 79

Philosophy

JAMES O. BENNETT
JAMES N. LANGHOFF
WILLIAM J. COSKREY
VAZKEN N. ASADOUKIAN
JOHN L. HOLLEMAN
HENRY J. FOLSE
EDWARD G. BALLARD
MICHAEL E. ZIMMERMAN
ROBERT I. JUHASZ
VAUGHANA MACY
CHARLES R. SCHMIDTKE

Physics

FRONT ROW:

JACK MEEHAN

BILL MEY

BRADLEY ELFMAN

ALAN JOHNSON

TERRY SONNONSTEINE

SECOND ROW:

BILL PAPAIOANNOU

RALPH LINN

JOEL AXT

JOHN HICKS

DON MOREL

MASAO NAGAO

THIRD ROW:

NGUYEN HANH

MARVIN JONES

CRUSE MELVIN

TOM RUSSELL

BOB HILL

POLARIZED:

CLIFF BOASSO

VERNON COTTLES

DARRELL GALDE

DEEPAK GUPTE

BARRY HAINDEL

RICHARD HARRISON

KAI-LI KO

SAL LONGO

JOE PENG

PAGE 80 / Graduate School

SEATED:

bill avery

i.kk i)owt)y

doik; youngren

larry moore

standing;

earl bender

glen nighols

britt pearlman-ahlferd

paul iierrick

cathy harmon

ladom wong-nom albergotti

chris miller

steve fisher

dave collins

willie walf

don dickson

in a smoke filled room:

david bethlne

margaret gates

tim gibbons

diane jennings

candy' perchan

frank petrusak

dennis schill

Political Science

PSYCHOLOGY

KNEELING:
SHARON CARLTON
J. C. RILEY
LAIR\ KAUFMAN
DICK NASH

STANDING:

BARBARA MCCLINTON

TOM SPRINGER

CHRISTINE CALDWELL

PAT EDSON

TOM o'bRIEN

FE LAI GH LIN

SALLY DIVELY

TIM ROSEN

JOAO OLIVEIR-A

TOM HEEBINK

MARTY WAITE

DAN MIRPHV

DAN MORIARTY

/ PAGE 81

Sociology

SEATED:

BARBARA GIULLARY
FLORA BLACKSTOCK
SALLY SEAMAN
ROBERT TERDEMAN
CLARK CROPP
PAMELA POISSONT

STANDING:

DR. THOMAS KTSANES

MEYER REED

JOHN MCCALLUM

JACK KRON

BILL CAMPBELL

GEORGE HOAG

Spanish and
Portuguese

FRONT ROW:

MARC MENEGHINI

DAVID WARREN

PROF. DANIEL S. WOGAN

MARIA LAGO

SECOND HOW:
JAMES RAMSEY
CRISTINA JOHNSON
CAROLINE MASSEY
JORGE REYES
MIRIAM PERRICONE
RON MULLER
JOSE VILASUSO

THIRD ROW:
CLAIRE MORRISON
MERCEDES TIBBITS
CARLOS ROMO
MARY STRETCH
NORKA DIAZ

NO ESTAN PRESENTE: I

MAS DE LA MITAD DEL DEPARTMENTC

PAGE 82 / Graduate School

Theatre

CENTER STAGE:

PATRICIA LAZARO

L. J. DECriR

MARI WEBER

MICHAEL WRIGHT

MAKIKO TAKACI

IN THE WINGS:

CLUNTON CLEAVER

JOHN GALBREATH

MAY WELLS JONES

QIEALY KEYES

CORA LEE PHILLIPS

ROBERT MOYER

/ PACE 83

A. W. ALLEN

JAMES WILLIAM ARMBRUSTER

STEPHEN MARK HERMAN

RICHARD H. BRETZ

STEPHEN A. BRINKMAN

JEROME THOMAS BROUSSARD

MICHAEL W. BRYANT

STANLEY K. BRYDE

WILLIAM W. BURSON, JR.

GLENN PHILIP CARSON

JOHN WARD CARSON

HENRY LAWRENCE CHANIN

ALLEN RYAN CHRISTENSEN

CHARLES BURTON CLARK

DANIEL DAVID CLARK

LOUIS HOLT CLOUD

ROGER W. COLLINS

MICHAEL JAMES CONNOR

CHRIS CONRAD

GREGORY JAMES COTTER

ROBERT W. CROSBY

NORMAN JOHN CURRIER

CHARLES R. DAUL

JACQUES F. DEBORSBLANC

JEAN PIERRE DECORMIS

TODD L. DEMPSEY

RICHARD P. DIEHL

BALAJI DORAISWAMY

PHILIP J. DORSEY

WAYNE A. DOWNING

HUGH M. DURDEN

PAUL EDWARD EBEL

ELROY WALTER ECKHARDT

STANLEY E. ELLINGTON, JR.

SAMUEL W. ENFIELD

WALTER CLARENCE FARMER

•J

PAGE 84 / Graduate Business Administration

^ ..J.n

mm:

INDUSTRIAL »-•""«=
MANUAL ""^

JULY *""'■

19B9 1969

^^^^

♦T

t >.

RALIMI FRANCIS FELDER
MICHAEL FERMAN
WILLIAM ROBERT FINNECAN
.JOHN R. FLINT
JLLIAN CHARLES FREEL, JH.
MERLE FREITAC

JOHN MASON FRYE
JOSEPH T. GADDIS
RICHARD W. GARFINKEL
CHARLES C. CAZAREK
GEORGE N. CIACOPPE
RICHARD HOWARD GOLDSMITH

FORREST V. GRAVES
JACK H. GRIFFITH, JR.
DAN S. GRIMES
GREGORY KENT GROVE
JAMES LAWRENCE HANSEN
WILLARD ENGENE HARRISON

JEFFREY' K. HARTMAN
GEORGE P. HIGDON, JR.
OLIVER A. HORD
JOHN C. HOUSE
LEAMON E. HOWELL
WILLIAM MCCAW HL'GHES, JR.

RICHARD E. HULL, JR.
CHARLES A. HUTST
STEVEN G. JAHNCKE
MARVIN A. JEFFCOAT

ERIC V. JOHNSON
GARY D. JOHNSON
JEFFREY HIRST JOHNSON
SCOTT A. JOHNSON-

JERRY W. JOHNSTON
OWEN L. JONES, JR.
WILLIAM A. JONES
PETER DE KANWrr
CHESTER E. KEITH, JR.
ALLEN R. KELLER

AUGUST L. KE1TES
NELSON J. KIESWETTER
DAVID n. KI.INGENSMITH
WILLIAM KLINKENSTEIN
EDWARD M. KNOFF, JR.
RICHARD A. LACQUEMENT

/ PAGE 85

BRUCE THOMAS LAMMERS

KEITH D. LAROSE

DICK TURNER LECtERE

ALBERT R. LEPAGE

SUSAN P. LEVIN

MIKE LEVY

JOHN L. LINDARS

JOHN A. LOSSE, IH

THOMAS W. LOTT

KAM HOONG LYE

EMANUEL P. MAIMONE

JERRY W. MANGRUM

DAVID J. MANIFOLD

MARCUR F. MARKS

JAMES P. MARTINEK

MICHAEL J. MATT

JAMES L. MATTHEWS

GEORGE A. MCCAMMON

DAVID K. MCDUFFIE

JOHN L. MCHALE, in

BRIAN M. MENZEL

RUSSELL A. MERICLE, JR.

EDWARD H. MILER

ALBERT J. MILLER, JR.

WILLIAM E. MILLER

GEOFFREY S. MOAKLEY

CHARLES L. MONNOT, III

RUSSELL F. MOON

JAMES F. MULLEN

DON H. MURDOCK

WALTER L. MURFEE

HUDSON R. NICHOLS

WILLIAM G. O'CONNOR

TAYLOR A. ONCALE

NIHAT A. OZAN

JOHN R. PAGE

PAGE 86 / Graduate Business Administration

f Nj^T' >?i|. p«7.'

RICHARD R. PACE
NICHOLAS H. PARKER
RALPH E. PARKHOUSE
MELVI.N C. PAYNE
JAMES M. PEEPLES
ROBERT H. PEERY

LUIS A. PEtLICER

JOSE M. DE OLIM PERESTRELO

NANCY B. PINSON

JAJVIO CASH POWELL

ROBERT >I, POWERS

JOHN L. RAFFERTY

JOSEPH RAFFIANI, JR.
BRAD C. REYNOLDS
JACKSON S. ROBBINS
CHARLES H. BOEDER
JOHN C. ROTH
LOUIS K. ROTHBARD

ASHTON J. RYAN, JR.
JORGE A. SARRIA
CHARLES H. SEAL
CATHERINE E. SEARCY
JOHN R. SHERBLTINE
RICHARD L. SIMMONS

EDWARD W. SKINNER
VINCENT L. SLACEL
WILLIAM E. SNEEL
ALV.4RO G. SOLERA
JOANNE R. STERBENZ
DEXTER STEVENS

DONALD G. SYLVESTER
RALPH S. TAGGART
WILLIAM L. TARNEV
DAVID C. TATO>I
JERRY TENBRINK
PETER D. THACHER

BRUCE A. THOMAS
KENARD N. TURPIN, HI
JAY E. VAUGHN
REBECCA V. WARD
DWICHT C. WEST
ANDREW T. WHITLEY

DAVID A. WIENER
HENRY G. WILLIAMS
WILLIAM WILLOUGHBY'
WAYNE J. WILSON
MARC C. ZAVADIL
ROBERT W. ZIIFLE

/ PAGE 87

Chemical Engineering

RElVOtD S, YU
CHING-YUAIV HSIEH

C. U. PATEL
JIM FORD

V. D. PRABHU

PAUL WILLIAMS

ROBERT GIARDINA

TSIN-CHAN LI

GEORGE SWAN

D. D. DOSHI

ON THE RIG:

JAMES BISHARA

MIRIAM E. JOHN

MARVIN K. JONES

ALLEN LAMBERT

LEWIS MAYARD

JULIUS NEUMEYER

MILES C. SEIFERT

MICHAEL TROSCLAIR

G. VILLAFANE

FRANZ VOGT

PAGE 88 / Graduate Engineering

Civil Engineering

CLOCKWISE:

NAVICHANDRA PATEL
RAJMIKANT AMIN
JERRY SCHROEDER
DAVE STEVENS
BILL POWELL
PERCY FREEMAN
LARRY MICKAL
SUDHIR MEHTA

UP A CREEK:

SAHABETTIN ALGANATAY

ALBERT COOCH

BEN HANEY

ROLLAND MURA

HERBERT ROl'SSEL

CLIFFORD STREET

/ PAGE 89

WILLIAM E. BARKMAN

POPAT D. MAKADIA

R. P. KUMAR

SOHRAB D. CHOKSEY

GOKALDAS GAJARIA

SYED MOINUDDIN

YIH-YOUNG CHEN

DU-TOIV DOUNG

SHEIH HSEIH

GREGORY MCGAR

VIKRAM SESAI

M. P. JANI

Electrical Engineering

PAGE 90 / Graduate Engineering

KANA PAREKH
DHIRAJ KOTHARI
MAGAN KANSAGRA
WAYNE MORSE
CHUCK WAUGAMAN
FREDERICK J. BROWIV
ED MOFFATT
DA>1D J. GARLAND
HANK GLINDMEYER
LOUIS O. SMITH, JR.
WARREN WHITE
FRED PARTUS
DOUGLAS BOY'LAN
WALLY GRANT
JOHN HUERKAMP
GOPAL SUTHAR
JAGDISH PATIDAR

UNDER THE TABLE:

BOB CHAN

JWO-MIN CHEN

CHARLES H. GOODMAN

DAVID HALL

ADAM HARRIS-HARSANYI

DAVID HEGEDUS

PRAKASH KARKAL

RAHMAN KHAN

SAM LIN

PAUL MUNAFO

HE MAN PATTANI

UWE PONTIUS

PANKAJ SHAH

SKIP SMITH

YI-LUNG SU

PATRICK TOU

FRITZ WILL

Mechanical Engineering

/ PAGE 91

Riverside

Research

Laroratories

PAGE 92 / Hebert Center

International

Center

For

Medical

Research

And

Training

Cali,

Columbia

NOT PICTURED:
CALI, COLUMBIA

I. C M. R. & T. / PAGE 93

Seniors

1 / MEG RITCHEY 20 /

2 / MAX TOBIAS 21 /

3 / ED SCHLESINGEK 22 /

4 / JOHN LANDREM 23 /

5 / JOHN STEINER 24 /

6 / PAT SHELDON 25 /

7 / HARRY HENDERSON 26 /

8 / CLAYTON RAMSEY 27 /

9 / ED CASTAING 28 /

10 / TOM BARR 29 /

11 / STEVE SHARBER 30 /

12 / MIKE COSSEY 31 /

13 / PHIL MONTELEPRE 32 /

14 / BEN HATFIELD 33 /

15 / JOHN DEVLIN 34 /

16 / WALLY QUINN 35 /

17 / ERNIE CARRERE 36 /

18 / BOB GREEN 37 /

19 / FRANK PARRATT 38 /

JOHN POINDEXTER 39 /

BOB CASEY 40 /

BUD NOEL 41 /

BILL DEMARS 42 /

DAVID KERSTEIN 43 /

EARL MCCOLLAM 44 /

ALEX ASHY 45 /

JON MASSEY 46 /

CHARLIE LECHE 47 /

LENNY BOUZON 48 /

RICARDO BILONICK 49 /

GEORGE CROUSE 50 /

RONNIE COX 51 /

HARRY ANDERSON 52 /

ED MCCLOSKEY 53 /
RICHARD CHRISTOVICH 54 /

PETER KEENAN 55 /

MIKE o'keefe 56 /

WAYNE ANDERSON 57 /

DAN DELPRIORE 58 /

RUBEN FREIDMAN 59 /

COURTNEY WILSON 60 /

MIKE HUGHES 61 /

JOHN MANARD 62 /

ABBOTT REEVES 63 /

COLLINS VALLEE 64 /

HENRY JUMONVILLE 65 /

CHARLIE GRUBB 66 /

DENIS BANDERA 67 /

DAVID OESTREICHER 68 /

FRED BLANCHE 69 /

DON SHINDLER 70 /

IRVING SHN AIDER 71 /

BILL WHITE . 72 /

DON PICKNEY 73 /

MIKE FITZPATRICK 74 /
JOEL LOEFFELHOLZ
GERALD BOSWORTH

DAVID CRAIG

KENNY MEYER

ALAN BOOKMAN

BRAINERD MONTGOMERY

ROBERT MAHONY

JERALD BLOCK

DAVID MARCELLO

HENRY BERNSTEIN

LYLE PHILIPSON

JUDY TABB

ANITA GANUCHEAU

CHARLES HAHN

DEE DRELL

SERGIO LEISECA

HARLEY CLUXTON

JOHN HOLMES

PETER EVERETT

BARRISTER BRAWL
CASUALTIES:

HERBERT ALEXANDER
BILL T. ALLISON
PAUL ANDERSON
AL L. ANDREWS
PHIPPIP AZAR
KEITH BELL
LEONARD BEUINS
RON BERTRAM)
JACQUES BEZOU
HAROLD BLOCK
RICHARD BOITALL
JOHN BRODERS
BILL BROWN

HUGH CHERRY
RUTLEDGE CLEMENT
TIM CLOUDMAN
DAVID <;OMBE
MICHAEL EI.IAS
JIMMY FARWELL
GREY FERRIS
DAVID <;II.I.IS
EDITH (;OMES

JOE «;rant

JOHN GROUT
RONALD <;i RTLER
HARRY HAHDIN

JAMES HAYES
ROBERT HEARIN
JAMES KAMBUR
HAROLD KUSHNER
ROBERT LEE

GEOFFREY LONGENECKER
IRv\ MARCUS
LOUIS MARRERO
ELBERT MARTIN
MALCOLM MEYER
CHESTER PARKER
JOSEPH PARKINSON
RONALD POyi ETTE

LIONEL PRICE
DONALD RICHARD
JAMES ROSS
JOHN SCHOEN
PHILIPP SEELIG
STEPHEN SKI.AMBA
DIANE SPIES
HELEN SI LLIVAN
WALTER THOMPSON
LOUIS TRENCHARD
JEFFREY VICTORY
RALPH WHALEN
JAMES WHEELER
MICHAEL WOLFSON

School of Law / pace 95

1 / MO LEGARDEUR

18/

2 / BARRY PERCH

19/

3 / BRUCE HORACK

20/

4 / JOHN BEATON

21/

5 / JIM BURTON

22/

6 / HAL SCOTT

23/

7 / MIKE KATZ

24/

8 / ANDY PLAUCHE

25/

9 / JERRY SAPORITO

26/

10 / ST. PAUL BOURGEOIS

27/

11 / GIL STAMP LEY

28/

12 / WES SHINN

29/

13 / JOHNNIE CLAYTON

30/

14 / GAYLE MARSHALL

31/

15 / SIMON ODERBERG

32/

16 / HARRY ROSENBERG

33/

17 / DAVID EDWARDS

34/

DOUG WALKER 35 /

ED DUBISSON 36 /

WILEY LASTRAPES 37 /

SONNY WIEGAND 38 /

DAW DELPRIORE 39 /

BOB PEARSON 40 /

FRAZIER RANKIN 41 /

JEFF SEIDMAN 42 /

RAINER LORENZ 43 /

P. J. STAKELUM 44 /

BOB CAUDLE 45 /

DON BERNARD 46 /

DONNA GUSTAFSON 47 /

BOB TRACHMAN 48 /

TOM SLINGLUFF 49 /

RICK VERLANDER 50 /

GUS MANTHEY 51 /

GERALD HADDICAN 52 /

MARCELLA ZIIFLE 53 /

DAN SCHEUERMANN 54 /

BILL KAMMER 55 /

TOM MAHFOUZ 56 /

ROGER ODGEN 57 /

PAUL GAROFALO 58 /

SKIP ORDEMANN 59 /

BILL BRUMFIELD 60 /

GAYLE LETULLE 61 /

BILL GUISE 62 /

BILL AXSON 63 /

GLENN BRADFORD 64 /

TOM STEELE 65 /
BRAINERD MONTGOMERY 66 /

JAMES WALLEY 67 /

DAN RESTER 68 /

JIM POPHAM
BOB HACKETT
THE "op"
CYNDY SAMUEL
NICK PIZZOLATTO
PARKER DINKINS
GREG GR.U)Y
DAVE HERMANN
ALAN PARR
ANDY DORA
CHARLES NESTOR
ERNIE BARROW
FLIP WILSON
ERNIE SMALLMAN
ROGER ROMBRO
GENE KATZ
MAC HANCOCK

Second Year

AT COFFEE:

LARRY ABBOTT

.1. D. ALVERSON

DARRYL D. BERGER

ANDRIS BLOMKALNS

FREDRICK BOESE

CHARLES BOURG

ERNEST CARRERE

RON CARROLL

DAN <.ARl SO

HARLEY CLliXTON

KATHRYN COLBERN

CLARENCE DOYLE

DIEGO GIORDANO-ECHEGOYEN

JEFFREY HACKER
BARBARA HIRSCH
LUCIIS HORNSBY
ROBERT HIGHES
GARY JOHNSON
LAWRENCE JONES
CHRISTIAN KEEDY'
JEANNE KRIEGER
JOHN LIPANI
CHARLES LOZES
ROBERT MANARD
PATRICIA IMATHES
DAVID MCGOWAN

ED MCLLHENNY
LEE MCMILLAN
ERIC MEIERHOEFER
MACHALE >IILLER
RONALD NABONNE
JOHN NICHOLSON
COLVIN NORWOOD
JOHN ROBBERT
JOSEPH ROl SE
LEON RIDLOFF
RICHARD SALLOIM
JOHN SAINDERS
JAMES SCARLVTA

DAN SCHEIERMANN
KEVIN SCHOENBERGER
LARRY SIMON
JOHN SNELL
ELLIOT SNELLINGS
WILLIAM STAHL
ROBERT SITHERLIN
ROYAL Till RSTON
GEORGE TROXELL
ROBERT WASUni RN
ALBERT WATSON
LEROY WATSON
ADRIENNE WESSLER

School of Law / page 9'

First Year

FRONT ROW:

BOB MORGAN

WALDEN HINGEL

CARL TRIESHMANN

BOB HOFFMAN

KERRY MASSARI

CHARLIE DUFFY

SECOND ROW:

HERNAN FRANCO

RICK EPSTEIN

GAIL HAFNER

GERRY WASSERMAN

DON SHLIMBAUM

CHARLES BRENDT

AMY KENNON

SANDRA GOLDSMITH

THIRD ROW:

EARLE BLIZZARD

HENRY DEVENS

BILL POUDRIER

LARRY LOMBARDO

NED KOHNKE

DAVID WEIGEL

BRIAN SONDES

JERRY ALBUM

JIM STOVALL

FOURTH ROW:

BORRIS UDDO

MIKE PAWLUS

IAN HIPWELL

ROUMI GONZALEZ

ROGER LANDHOLM

JIM KNUDSON

DON TAMBURO

ROBERT LAKEY

BILL WARD

FIFTH ROW:

TOM NOSEWILZ

ALFONSO ARIAS

ROGER SIMS

MARSHA FEINBERG

JIM RYAN

MILTON LORENZ

RON FAHRENBACHER

PETER PICCIONE

RON HARRIS

BRIAN BEGUE

DICK NORWOOD

LENNIE GEYER

SUSAN KORNS

CRAIG KELLERMANN

PAGE 98 / School of Law

FRONT ROW:
RALPH ALEXIS
WALTER STUART

SECOND ROW:
STAN IRVIN
WARREN MIGUEZ
JOE NOLLY
JIM CUNNINGHAM
JEFF SAKAS
HENRY BERTHELOT

THIRD ROW:
RONNIE HARRIS
DAVID GOLIA
DAN ELROD
WAYNE CRESAP
JOHN PICKRON
JANICE GONZALES
FRANK BARRY
CALVIN FOX

FOURTH ROW:
DAVID SPENCER

GEORGE GRAVES
HARRY MORGAN
TOM CARRAWAY
RICH BURKE
ED BURCHELL
GEORGE BYRNE

FIFTH ROW:
EARLE BLIZZARD
JIM WHITTENBURG
HOWATT PETERS
ROWLAND HEIDELBERG
FRED BOYNTAN
NED KOHNKE
ROGER SIMS
FRANK BURNSIDE
BASILE UDDO

SIXTH ROW:
FRANK YOHAN
DWIGHT NORTON
LARRY DEAN
PATRICIA ANN HAIR

SF.VENTII ROW:
MIKE WELLFORD
GEORGE PEREZ
TUCKER MELANCON

F.ICHTH ROW:
CINDY WEGMANN
LENNIE FISHER
DAYTON BAKER

IN THE STACKS:
JOSE ACOSTA
JOHN ALBANESE
FRANCOIS ALLAIN
PAUL BARICOS
JOHN BAUM
MARK BEYER
ROBERT BIRTEL
HERBERT BOWERS
FRED BRADLEY
RANDALL BROOKS

ANDREW BROWN

PORTEUS BURKE

LARRY CAMPBELL

BILL CHERBONNIER

GREG EATON

GREG EATON SHIRLEY ECAN

SHIRLEY EAGEN

ROBERT ELLIS

PATRICK FANNING

ALFRED FARRELL

DAVID FORSYTH

WALTER FRIEDERICHSEN

CLYDE GIORDANO

GARY GOCHNOR

KATHERINE GOLDMAN

KENNETH GOLDSTEIN

RAYMOND HAEUSER

MORRIS HILL

LUTHER HORTON

CHARLES JENSEN

JON JOHNSON

DAVID KESLER

HENRY KINNEY

FRONT HOW:
TRAN HUU DINH
SANGUAN LEWMANOMONT
FRANCOISE PECCOUD

SECOND ROW:
KATHY PIERSON
BRIAN JONES
JEFF KING
BRAGG WILLIAMS
PAUL MINOR
JERRY o'KEEFE

THIRD ROW:
MICHAEL CUCULLU
TERELL BROUSSARD
GLEN FIELTON
RONALD HARRIS
MICHAEL KULCZAK
DENNIS LARUSSA
JIM SCUTTI

FOURTH ROW:
ROBERT FISHER
FRANCOIS JOUVEL
JACK ROBINSON
LARRY BUCHTEL
PAUL LEBAS
ELMER GIBBONS
BILL BENHAM
PHIL ALLEN
TOM SPROTT

FIFTH ROW:
LEE WALLACE
STEVE LUNDSTROM
MIKE COLEMAN
RUTH ELLEN REVZEN
CHARLES H. DE ST. CROIX
PEGGY BERCK
JOY BROWN
RICHARD FELDMAIV
JOSEPH RAULS

TORGER OMDAHL
GUY HUARD

SIXTH ROW;
JOE HANSEN
GLENN ABEL
LAMAR RICHARDSON
RALEIGH OHLMEYER
DAVID DAUME
NORMAN WEAKER
BARBARA JACKSON
EARLE BLIZZARD

SEVENTH ROW:
CHARLES DUKE

EIGHTH ROW:
MITCH EX
KEVIN WEIN

IN THE STACKS:

JESSE LEBLANC
OCTAVE LIVAUDIAS
BAHMIN LOFTI
KEITH MAY
BILL MORGAN
IRA MOSS
JOSEPH MYERS
ADAM ORTEGO
BRIAN PERRY
MIKE PIPER
THOMAS PIXTON
ELON POLLACK
LEO POORT
LEONARD RADLAl ER
BILL RANDS
TIM ROMGER
VALENTINE SCHEIRICH
RICHARD SHERMAN
JAMES WADLEY'
SID WALTON

/ PAGE 99

ELLEN MAYO / 1

SYLVLA. MINOR / 2

LYNN HARRISON / 3

DORINDA NOBLE / 4

ESTHER MCBRIDE / 5

KAREN COMMARATO / 6

MARTHA HUGHES / 7

STELLA NARCISSE / 8

KAREN LEWIS / 9

KAREN HEDDEN / 10

PAULETTE COTHREN / 11

GAIL RUBIN / 12

HERMAN GATES / 13

HOWARD STANTON / 14

ANN MUSICK / 15

ROBERTA GILL / 16

BILL PETTY / 17

ROSEMARY MCCRAHAN / 18

LEWIS KECKLEY / 19

PAGE 100 / School of Social Work

20 / SARAH RAHAIM

21 / DOUGLAS POSEY

22 / JACK MARTIN

23 / STELLA BROWN

24 / SHELIA FLO^T)

25 / CAROLINE DOTSON

26 / ELAINE LORD

27 / KAY GRANT

28 / JAMES FRANK

29 / LOUISE CATE

30 / BOB DUET

31 / SHARON CHUDY

32 / JOE BRYAN

33 / MARY HART

34 / LYNN STURGEON

35 / ANTONIO LUHAN

36 / GLEN MCQUAGE

37 / BEV SCHNEIDER

38 / FR. JOHN NOONE

39 / SUSAN KINGSTON

40 / BARBARA JONES

41 / SIS. MARY ANNE FRANK

42 / JEWELL TURNER

43 / KAREN THORNTON

44 / KAYSEY SANCHEZ

45 / MARY CORYN

46 / PEGGY RICHARDS

47 / DOUG HOLT

48 / PENNY SHOLARS

49 / THOMAS DEMARTTNI

50 / HENRY LEE

51 / PATTY NEALON

52 / GINNY NEWLAND

IN THE FIELD:
ROSEMARY BARNHARDT
DEWAIN BELGARD
SUSAN BLATCHFORD

PAMELA BUCHANAN
MURIEL BURNSTEIN
DAVID CARLETON
CORA ALL CHANDLER
SARA ANN CRAWFORD
CONSTANCE CULBREATH
MILO FAUSTERMANN
BARBARA FEATHER
RENNA GODCHAUX
LINDA GRAVATTI
CAROLYN HARDEN

MALCOLM HESS

ELAINE JOHNSON

WILLIE KELLER

EILEEN KRAUSS

ANDRINA MCCAFFREY'

EVA MCLEOD

GAY MINES

JAY NIEMAYAR

GORDON PAGE
DONALD PIERSON
SUSANNA RENO
RUTH STAM
ANDRE E THIBODEAL'X
REBEKAH VANHOOSER
MARY VANOSTENBERG
EARLEEN WAGNER
GARY WHELCHEL
DAN WILLIAMS
BARBARA WOLITZ

/ PAGE 101

ANN JOHNSON / 1

PAM WOOTEN / 2

REITA TROUM / 3

GEORGE INGLE / 4

BILL SCHOOF / 5

JOHN KING / 6

EILEEN DAVIS / 7

JAQULYN KENT / 8

BRENDA BOCAGE / 9

YUPA TUMPRAYOT / 10

JUDY ROSS / 11

DIANNE DRINKER / 12

BARBARA LAUGHLIN / 13

JACQUELINE SIMONEAUX / 14

RUTH WELK / 15

ELWOOD KLINE / 16

ANNE ROBERTSON / 17

EDWARD WOJNAROWSKI / 18

DIANE LAMBLY / 19

BEN KNOTT / 20

ROBERT COOPER / 21

JERRY CLARK / 22

JAMES BROUSSARD / 23

KAY KEMBLE / 24

DON BOBO / 25

LINDA JONES / 26

ADA YOUNG / 27

EVA MAE BOWIE / 28

DAVID NIEMAN / 29

EVELYN HOLT / 30

SALVATORE CARUSO / 31

EDWARD BUVENS / 32

BRENDA KELLEY / 33

VICKIE WILLIAMS / 34

PHYLLIS HEATON / 35

KATHY GRAFF / 36

MIKE WHITE / 37

BARBARA SMITH / 38

MARY DEE FAIRCHILD / 39

PATRICIA REED / 40

JEANETTE LEWIS / 41

WILMA DUNCAN / 42

JEAN RINGLER / 43

JUDITH FAUST / 44

SHIRLEY HASPEL / 45

CAROL CHANDLEE / 46

PAGE 102 / School of Social Work

/ PAGE 103

JOHN ALSTON

ROGER ANASTASIO

ROBERT ANCIRA

RICHARD ANDERSON

THOMAS ANDERSON

WINSTON ANDERSON

LAURENCE AREND

HENDRICK ARNOLD

RONALD BARBIE

STEPHEN BINNS

JEROME BLACKMAN

STEVEN BLACKWELL

DAVID BONHAM

JAMES BONNET

ISAAC BROWDER

ARCHIE BROWN

SHERMAN BROWN

GEORGE BURGESS

RONALD BUSUTTIL

HARRY CAZZOLA

JOSEPH CHIAPELLA

GEORGE CHU

DELLIE CLARK

STEPHEN COCHRAN

GLORIA COKER

CLIFFORD COLEMAN

KENNETH COMBS

JOHN CURTISS

GARY DANOS

RISE DELMAR

PAGE 104 / School of Medicine — Seniors

DALTON DIAMOND
JON EDWARDS
GERY EPLER

REAVIS EfBANKS
RICHARD EVANS
MICHAEL FINN

JACK FLEET
BARRY FRAME
JAN FRIEDMAN

MARC FRIEDMAN
LAWRENCE GALINKIN
MICHAEL GALLIGAN
PETER GOLDMAN
MILES GRABER
SANDRA GRABER

JAY GRIMALDL
CHARLES HADDAD
RICHARD HALL
CHARLES HANES
GEORGE HARRIS
WILLIAM HELVIE

JEREMIAH HOLLEMAN
JA>IES HOOKER
RXNDOLPH HOWES

%t%

WALTER JAMES
JOHN JOHNSTON
JOHN JONES

GERALD JOSEPH
ROBERT KAMINSKI
SCOTT KELLERMANN

/ PAGE 105

JAMES KNOEPP
CONRAD KBEBS

IRIS KRUPP
IVRI KUMIN

GLENN LAMBERT
DOUGLAS LANDWEHR

WAYNE LARRABEE

CHARLES LILLY

ROBERT LIPSON

CHARLES LONG

ALFRED LOTMAN

DONALD LUEBKE

ARTHUR MATTHEWS

RICHARD MAY

JOHN MCCABE

THOMAS MCLURE

JAMES MCQUITTY

JAY MERTEN

FLOYD MEYER

BRUCE MEYERS

MICHAEL MOORE

TED MOORE

JACK MORGAN

JAMES MOROCK

HAROLD NEELY

DALE NICKEL

PETER NIELSON

JAMES NORTHINGTON

DONALD NOVICK

ARTHUR NUSSBAUM

PAGE 106 / School of Medicine — Seniors

C^ ^- ^;

c3> ^ c^

{'^ U^f 1^

WILLIAM o'MARA
MHHAEL RAYBECK
JOHN REA
JOSEPH ROMGER
ROBERT ROYBAL
JAMES SAALFIELD

RANDOLPH SEYBOLD
ROBERT SHAW
JAMES SHELLEY
HOWELL SLAIGHTER
JAMES SMITH
JOSEPH SOSNOW

ANDREA STARRETT
HENRY STELLING
TOMMY SWATE
LAURENCE TANAKA
THADDELS TEAFORD
WILLIAM THOMPSON

PAUL TIBBITS
TIMOTHY- TRICHE
LAWRENCE TRUE
JEFFREY TUCKER

JOHN VAN BODEGOM
M.AX VAN GILDER
WILLIAM WALSH
RICHARD WARD

PHYLLIS WICGERS
THOMAS WILDES
DAAin WOLF
JOHN YOUNGBERG

/ PAGE 107

Third Year

Medicine

31 / MARVIN SMITH

32 / JIM WATTS

33 / BRUCE SAAL

34 / CHRIS SKINNER

35 / DR. HANS WEILL

36 / PETE GOTH

37 / MIKE MASCIA

1 / ARTHUR HADLEY

11 / BRIAN TRAVIS

21/

2 / BEVERLY MATTHEWS

12 / CARL SOLOMON

22/

3 / BILL GARRETT

13 / FRED WOOD

23/

4 / HARRIETTE CLAY

14 / STUART MAY

24/

5 / KARL KARLSON

15 / WOODY SANDERS

25/

6 / KEN ROY

16 / GARY JANKO

26/

7 / HERBERT HENRY

17 / JOHN TURBA

27/

8 / JOHN DALTON

18 / GARY HOLT

28/

9 / JOHN COOPER

19 / ELTON MCAMIS

20/

/ CRAIG MAUMUS

20 / JOYCE ISAACS

30/

RON CYGAN
JIM PATTERSON
PETER MEYERS
BILLY FRIEDMAN
LAUREL SCHULTZ
ANDY SCHWARTZ
GEORGE FERENCZI
STAN CARSON
DONALD MAHONEY
JOHN HOWE

MAKIIVG HOUNDS:
STEPHEN BRINT
BILL BUFFAT
DAN DOHERTY
COLLINS FINNEY
JAMES JOST
RICHARD NESS
P. J. ROSS
MELVIN SCHULTZ
GEORGE SMITH
JAMES WHITE

PAGE 108 / School of Medicine

Pediatrics

EUGENE CARPENTER / 1

TOM DAVIS / 2

PETE PROSSER / 3

LARRY ANGLIN / 4

PRESLEY JACKSON / 5

WILLY ORR / 6

BRENT AIN / 7

DAVID WRIGHT / 8

THOMAS WRIGHT / 9

JACK HOBBS / 10

LOWELL BAREK / 11

HOWARD WEISS / 12

PHIL POTH / 13

DAVID JARROTT / 14

BOB ANCIRA / 15

HAROLD JURAN / 16

ROGELIO MENENDEZ-CORDOVA / 17

DAVID MCFARLING / 18

STAN SMITH / 19

JOHN STOVER / 20

LARRY SPRATLING / 21

STEVE ABSHIRE / 22

ALVIN AUBRY / 23

JOE BLINDERMAN / 24

BILL BUTLER / 25

JUM HURST / 26

JOE GARVIA-PRATTS / 27

DON GALE / 28

MIKE ZOLLER / 29

IN THE WARD:

PAUL BEST

BONITA CARSON

JOHN COLEMAN

HUGO ENGELHARDT

JEFF GORDON

JONATHAN LORCH

ROGER MCCLELLAN

MADELYN MANNING

LARRY MATSUMOTO

TOM MORRIS

RANDY PARKER

RON RIEFKOHL

RON RITCHEY

/ PAGE 109

Third Year

1 / BRUCE PATTERSON 11 /

2 / DREW LOGUE 12 /

3 / RANDY BUCHANAN 13 /

4 / FRED OCHSNER 14 /

5 / FRANK REED 15 /

6 / BEN GUIDER 16 /

7 / RICHARD EPSTEIN 17 /

8 / JAMES GOODNER 18 /

9 / ELDA HOGUE 19 /
10 / LYLE MASON 20 /

SUSAN BOSTON 21 /

PAUL GULBAS 22 /

MILES BRETT 23 /

FLIP SMITH 24 /

CALEB HERNDON 25 /

JAY KRAVITZ 26 /
MICHAEL MCCLINTON 27 /

JIM BOOKMAN 28 /

MICHAEL DESHAZO 29 /

STEVE SORGEN 30 /

DAVID PLOTNER
KEN BREWINGTON
MIKE MAFFETT
LESTER MARION
BILL AUSTIN
BUDDY PERROTT
BILL WRIGHT
JOHN SALISBURY
TED KLOTH
BILL BETHEA

Surgery

31 / MARK STRAUSS

32 / RICHARD SMITH

33 / PHIL MCKINLEY

34 / BILL TURNER

35 / CRAIG WINKEL

36 / JAY MAGGIORE

37 / BOB HOLZHAUER

38 / CHRIS ROBINSON

39 / ALLAN MELMED

40 / LYNN GREELEY

41 / DAVID WILENSKY

42 / BRUCE HUGHES

43 / FURMAN WALLACE

44 / DAVID SORENSON

SCRUBBING UP;
JOHN BOURGEOIS
LOUIS JEANSONNE
DAVID SANDERSON

PAGE 110 / School of Medicine

Second
Year

1 / BETTY SMITH

2 / MIKE BOFF

3 / MARCILLE MAHAN

4 / BICK FERRYMAN

5 / ANN FERGUSON

6 / DAVID ELIZARDI

7 / CHARLIE JOHNSON

8 / MARK WARSHAW

9 / RICHARD SABATIER

10 / JAMES BERGMAN

11 / DICK MITCHELL

12 / JOHN LUBER

13 / BILL CARRIERE

14 / ED DAPREMONT

15 / BOB MILLER

16 / FRED SCHERT

17 / PAUL MORRIS

18 / DAVID HAFT

19 / ED SHAHEEN

20 / JOSE PORTUONDO

21 / BOB RUSSO

22 / VINCENTE LAGO

23 / BRITT WEST

24 / JOHN GURDIN

25 / IRVING JOHNSON

26 / RENNIE CULVER

27 / JOHN SIMMONS

28 / MARK AVERBUCH

29 / JIM CHANGUS

30 / BILL CLARK

31 / TOMMY HAWK

32 / HOWARD MOORE

33 / ELLIOTT COULD

34 / MAURICE NASSER

35 / HOWARD MILLER

36 / GARY GOLDBARD 71 /

37 / JOE DALOVISIO 72 /

38 / TERRY HABIG 73 /

39 / GARY MAYES 74 /

40 / BILL GARTH 75 /

41 / JIM NUNLEY 76 /

42 / GARY MORRISON 77 /

43 / PAT PERKINS 78 /

44 / JAMES JOHNSTON 79 /

45 / JOHN WELLS 80 /

46 / CRAIG KESSLER 81 /

47 / CHARLES O'MARA 82 /

48 / JOE MCCRARY 83 /

49 / JEAN JEW 84 /

50 / MARSHALL SCHREEDER 85 /

51 / DAVID DUNN 86 /

52 / CHUCK STEWART 87 /

53 / DAVTD BROMBERG 88 /

54 / LESSA PHILLIPS 89 /

55 / BILL RASKIN 90 /

56 / BROBSON LUTZ 91 /

57 / HARRY CREEKMORE 92 /

58 / DICK WOOD' 93 /

59 / BOB BASS 94 /

60 / BILL REED 95 /

61 / CATHY SAMPLES 96 /

62 / PAUL CAMPBELL 97 /

63 / GEORGE DESORMEAUX 98 /

64 / NICHOLAS SELF 99 /

65 / JOEL COHEN 100 /

66 / JOHN SAARI 101 /

67 / BOB GRIFFITH 102 /

68 / WARREN HAGAN 103 /

69 / RICK CALVIN 104 /

70 / NICK PETRELLI 105 /

BOB CUMMINGS

GLEN LIBBY

RON WENDER

MONTE IKEMIRE

JOHN HOBART

ED LAYNE

BOB RYCHLY

LARRY MAZZOTTA

JOHN MARTIN

JOHN WINTER

BOB TOFTE

PETER RABIN

BILL HOCKING

ART CHANG

BILL RAWLINGS

BRENT JOSEPH

JANET YOUNG

TERRY MARKS

BOB HOSEA

KENNY SMITH

KEN MULLEN

ARNOLD FINKELMAN

JOEL ROSENBERG

BOB BLANKENSHIP

DON ROSENBLUM

MIKE RAIFE

DAVID LUBIN

ULLA JO ULE

ROBERT FREEDMAN

PETE LEVINE

HAL ROSENBLATT

TOM HARPER

TONY NG

CRAYTON CIBOROWSKI

MONTY BELL

106 / RICHARD AIBHART

107 / VIRGINIA WILLIAMS

108 / MARTIN EVANS
109 /bill OLSON
110/ JEFF LAU

111 /tom steffen

112 /adrian dean

113 / cuff crafton
114/ joe hobton

115 / craig colman

116 / bruce iteld

117 /donlacrone

118 /ED lUFF

119/ JAMES LABORDE

120 / JIM AVERS

121 / TOM GWMSTAD

122 / GREER MCHETSON

123 / BARRY NAGEL

124 / MIKE MOSER

125 / BOB TANNER

126 / RICHARD BRINNER

127 / JEFF MABMELZAT

128 / RICK LUKASH

129 / DAVID BOUBHEAUX

130 / ANN LOVITT

131 / MIKE FITZSIMMONS

132 / ROCKY KENT

133 / DWIGHT LEE

134 / JIM WEAVER

135 / PAULINA ROGNONI
OFF FAEX HUNTING:
STEVE HENSON

BILL LONG

BOB MERIWETHER

MIKE VOLSKY

/ PACE 111

PAGE 112 / School of Medicine

First
Year

Second
Year

1 / PAUL HUNT

2 / ART MCLEAN

3 / ALTON HOMEBO

4 / GEORGE HOFFMAN

5 / JAY BOHN

6 / VAN DAVroSON

7 / JIM OWEN

8 / MICHAEL GOLDBEBG

9 / BONALD WYCHE

10 / MOBBIS MANN

11 / STEVEN TAYLOB

12 / HAHVEY MARICE

13 / MIKE HUNT

14 / HENRYNNE LOUDEN

15 / COBDON HEALEY

16 / W. R. COLLIE

17 / DAVID CABNEB

18 / PAUL PACE

19 / SHEBBY BBAHENY

20 / C. B. SKINNEB

21 / KEBMIT WALTEBS

22 / DAVID MCLAIN

23 / BICHARD OTTS

24 / WILLIAM CALDWELL

25 / MICHAEL TOOKE

26 / MICHAEL MCFADDEN

27 / JIM BEAN

28 / HEATHER BUTLER

29 / DENNIS SUICH

30 / J. E. JOHNSON

31 / CAROL TIPTON

32 / KENNETH GORDON

33 / ROBERT BAXTEB

34 / THOMAS HOWABD

35 / LABBY OSBUBN

36 / PAT DOLAN

37 / STEVE HEABD

38 / LOUIS MOBGAN

39 / JIM FLOBEY

40 / EBMAN RAWLINCS

41 / JOHN MEYEB

42 / DENNIS BADEMACHEB

43 / GEBBY DEFRAITES

44 / JOHN EICK

45 / IRA UDELL

46 / MIKE LUNDY

47 / BOB CALDWELL

48 / BBUCE SAMUELS

49 / HANNAH CLABK

50 / MITCHEL THABIT

51 / STEVE BAHOU

52 / WHITNEY BEADEB

53 / CHABLES SIMONSON

54 / BALPH ASBUBY

55 / HENBY KWONC

56 / TOM WATSON

57 / JANICE BLUMENTHAL

58 / CANDICE BOHB

59 / BOD BABNHABDT

60 / STEVE HABBISON

61 / JIM MUBPHY

62 / STANLEY WATSON

63 / GBETA HERMAN

64 / ART FOUGNER

65 / ROBERT CLARK

66 / CRAIG FERBELL

67 / BICHABD STBOBACK

68 / ABTHUB GBEEN

69 / DAN JACOB

70 / BOB FLANDBY

71 / LEE WINELAND

72 / ACE JONES

73 / J. p. ELLISON

74 / BOBERT JEFFERS

75 / STEVEN KLEIN

76 / CHABLIE FISCHMAN

77 / LABBY BARNES

78 / TOM REED

79 / MIKE KELLY

80 / E. K. BLYTHE

81 / EBIC GEWOLB

82 / BILL LACOBTE

83 / MABK STEIN

84 / JAMES COOK

85 / MICHAEL MCDONALD

86 / DAVID OLSON

87 / EUGENIA GABY

88 / PAUL CATBOU

89 / MICHAEL HICGINS

90 / MARTHA SLATER

91 / DOUG WAGNER

92 / CAROL DUNN

93 / STEPHEN HARRIS

94 / LELAN SILLIN

95 / JUDY CIOLITTO

96 / STUABT AGBEN

97 / STOKES DICKINS

98 / STEPHEN HOBWITZ

99 / BABBABA DENAIS

100 / JOE MARNELL

101 / DON FISICHELLA

102 / VICTOR GARCIA-PRATS

103 / PHILLIP KELLY

104 / ROBERT CABD

105 / DAVID ABBOTT

106 / PAUL ZELNICK

107 / BOB PATYBAK

108 / MIKE WILENSKY

109 / BBUCE WALLACE

110 / BICHARD SILVER
111/ LOUIS BONITA

112 / ED SPITZ

113 / FRED JACQUES

1 14 / J AN KAUFMAN

115 / MARC ARMSTBONG

116 / LINDA KESSLER

117 / JASON SMITH

118 / STANLEY LEONG
119/ STEVE SOTMAN

120 / JUD SHELLITO

121 / JOSEPH LOCICEBO

122 / SAM WATERS

123 / BICHABD PABKINSON

124 / ANDY CAHTEB

125 / BAND SPENCEB

126 / BARBY SIMON

127 / JAYNE GUBTLEB

128 / ARNOLD SPANJERS

129 / RICH WESTFAL

130 / GEORGE RODCERS

131 / KIRK BELLAKD

132 / TRAVIS KENNY

133 / JOHN HESS

134 / GARY SANDER

135 / GENE BOSENBEBG

CADAVER BALL CASUALTIES:
NICHOLAS CAMPO
WILLIAM COLEMAN
MABGABET GUSTAFSON
STEPHEN HARBISON
JOHN HUDNALL
NEIL MANOWITZ
CHABLES PERBINE
KAL SHWABTS
LAWBENCE VINIS
PATBICIA WEBSTEB
GEOFFREY WIEDEMAN

First
Year

PAGE 114 / Lodges

Alpha Delta Pi

1-7 / SEVEN LITTLE DWARFS

8 / CORIE FRANTZ

9 / JANE BETTS

10 / LAUREL MALOWNEY

11 / MEGAN KELLY

12 / MARGARET MILLER

13 / KAREN SMITH

14 / JOAN JACKSON

15 / CINDY ECKERT

16 / SARAH MINARD

17 / JOANNA PESSA

18 / CATHY BOUDREAUX

19 / ELAINE NODEN

20 / MARY ADORE COLONEY

21 / BETZIE PEPPO

22 / JUDY MOFFITT

23 / DEBBIE SABALOT

24 / KAREN ABBOTT

25 / JEANNE COLEMAN

26 / JEAN BUETTNER

27 / LINDA HELMAN

28 / JANET TAYLOR

29 / PAT DAVENPORT

30 / BECKY DOZIER

31 / BUTCH GOLDENSTAR

PAGE 116 / Lodges

§ ^

w.. ^-^

^p^.^^

Wl '

^ — 1

^IPI^%

K-:: . «,

iBv

^^m

■:^

.-^^t

v^/

1 / BETH MAXWELL

2 / EDIE PEPPER

3 / VICKI KEIKES

4 / ELLEN FRIEDMAN

5 / MARILYN BERNSTEIN

6 / MARLENE ESKIND

7 / SUSAN FORSYTH

8 / DERBY KLEIN

9 / CINDY COHEN
10 / STEPHIE FRIEFIELD

11 /DEBBIE GOLDSTEIN

12 / PAM TITLE

13 / BLAINE LEGUM

14 / PAULA SHAPIRO

15 / ARLENE TORBIN
16 / RUTH SHAPIRO

17 / LOUISE WOLF

18 / KAY SAMPSON

19 / ILENE DOBROW

20 / ELLEN GOLD

21 / DEE ALTFATER

22 / SHERRY' ZOX

23 / PAM FRANK
24 / CAROL HERMAN

25 / PAULA WEXLER

26 / VICKI SAMUELS

27 / LINDA KRAMER

28 / LIZ FINK

29 / TRICIA RICH

30 / PATTI RICHARD

31 / JOAN ROSENFELS

32 / PAT PRINS

33 / IRENE CALDWELL

34 / JUDY ROSS

35 / PATSY FRIEDLER

36 / MARSHA FLANZ

37 / CAROL LAVIN

38 / CAROLYN LIPSON

39 / LINDA SAUL

ELSEWHERE :

DALE BARKEN

MINDY' BARRAR

BARBARA BRIN

SHELLEY' DORFMAN

FILLIS GERSON

JANET GETZ

BARBARA GINSBERG

SUSAN GOLDFADEN

BETTY GORDON

SARALYN JACOBSON

MADELON JAFFE

MELANIE KUSIN

BETH MARX

JOAN MICHELSON

JANE MOOS

MARGO MORET

PEGGY MORRISON

CISSY PASS

SHARON PEARLINE

ELLEN ROSENBLOOM

SUE SALZ

PATSY SEWEL

BRUCIE SILVERMAN

PEGGY STEINE

CAROL STONE

SUSAN WAGNER

DIANE WALKER

RIKI WEINSTEIN

CONNIE WERNER

SUSAN WEXLER

Alpha Epsilon Phi

Lodges / page 119

Alpha Omicron Pi

12.6

1-5

'30

22.

• L

^1§^

^^^

1 / PETER PONTCHARTRAIN

2 / TOMMY TWO-LANE

3 / ANDY AUDUBON

4 / FRANCES PAPPAS

5 / TOMMY

6 / BETH FOUTS

7 / MIKE SCHAUB

8 / FLORA EUSTIS

9 / KAREN MANEMANN

10 / KAY WARR

11 / LISA HALL

12 / JOAN KING

13 / MIKE

14 / LINDA GURTLER

15 / NAN LANDRY

16 / BETSY KEYS

17 / CATHY GRIFFIS

18 / GEORGE

19 / ADELE SALZER

20 / CHERYL PALERMO

21 / KATHY SCHNEIDAU

22 / LESLIE LEWIS

23 / AMY KNIGHT

24 / STEPHANIE TWILBECK

25 / PRIS MIMS

26 / SUZANNE TAYLOR

27 / VIRGINIA SCHNEIDAU

28 / MARTHA SELLERS

29 / LEAH STRAUB

30 / BRUCIE CORNELL

31 / DIANE RYAN

32 / SUSAN VAN HART

33 / GWEN HAGER

34 / COLLEEN MUNDS

35 / BETH SINGLETON

SOMEWHERE ELSE:
JAN GONZALES
LINDA GONZALES
KATHLEEN LAMBERT
GUSSIE MORRIS

PAGE 120 / Lodges

^ '4

-'^'^ -^^^

It"

'K^

I^^BgjSI ^ili

F««« ^

1! .J-.

1 / MIKE HICKOK

2 / STEVE REILLY

3 / DAVE MARTIN
4 / DAVID PEREZ

5 / JIM REED

6 / GEORGE MCGOWIN

7 / PHIL DEPP

8 / TIM FRECH

9 / DAVID C.ASTANON

10 / MIKE JAMES

11 / ART PAULINA

12 / JOHN MARKHAM

13 / BERT TURNER

14 / ROCK PAULL

15 / JACK BURKETT

16 / JOHN PEMBERTON

17 / GARRY LARSEN

18 / TOM ALLISON

19 / GLEN GREINER

20 / BOB LACLEDE

21 / KEITH PYBURN

22 / DICK SALKIN

23 / FRED SCHLESINGER

24 / DAVE EBERT

25 / KYLE DENNIS

26 / ROB PETERSON

27 / PHIL DOMINGUEZ

28 / CHARLIE SNOW

29 / LEONARD BROWN

30 / CHARLES RUARK

31 / SID FARMER

32 / FARCH ANDERSON

33 / SAM ROBINSON

34 / CHICK CALDWELL

35 / ALEX ASHY

36 / GLENN ABEL

OUT BACK:

JIM AITIN

JEFF AYCOCK

DAVE BEI.LVMY

MIKE COLLINS

TO>I GREY

MAC HYMAN

DAY JIMENEZ

DENNIS K\SIATI VN

MILES KEHOE

RAY KINNFY

HIM, KLEIN

JOHN KRl PSKY

WAYNE I.OI.AN

JERRY MCGLOTHLEN

KENNY MCNEIL

FRED MONTERl BIO

JAY SHAI K.ri

BOB WHITEMVN

Alpha Sigma Phi

Lodges / page 123

Beta Theta Pi

1 / WOODIE

2 / RICHARD ATWOOD

3 / DAVID FLOWERE

4 / CHUCK BRENT

5 / MILES PRATT

6 / MORGAN JONES

7 / GEORGE LARSEN

8 / CHARLES HARRISON

9 / HARRY QUARLLS

10 / BOB MCKINNON

11 / MARK BADGER

12 / DAVID SYMS

13 / JIM WILBERT

14 / YAT COLOMB

15 / JOHN MCCUTCHEN

16 / NICK POWELL

17 / JOHN DOWELL

18 / BOB MYERS

19 / RICK RICHDUX

20 / THOM FRANKLIN

21 / JIM REES

22 / JIM GOODLAD

23 / DOC MEHURIN

24 / CY BOWERS

ABSENT:

RICK DRUMMOND

NED HEMARD

CHUCK MCGEE

LOUIS GURVICH

SPARKIE

STEVE VONBEVRON

RICHARD WEINBERG

WOOGLIN

PAGE 124 / Lodges

,:-?^.

^ m

'^^\

.>~i!!^

^fr' :

■■«*•*

■^'

^^^

^^▼>.

;^^%.'

%;->vv.;^'^.

1 / DALE DANE

2 / CANDY ROSS

3 / C;WEN GARNER

4 / NANCY HALL

5 / SrSAN DORSEY'

6 / .lANIE AFFOLTER

7 / <;k«)R«;e ann iiayne

8 / deidre white

9 / karen russi

10 / tricia hopkins

11/ kit lozes

12 / SrZANNE LE BLANC

13 / NEIL ANN ARMSTRONG

14 / CAROLYN NELSON

15 / HOLLY EARL

16 / ANN BOIDREAUX

17 / LESLIE ALBERTINE

18 / MARGIE BOOKER

19 / BETH WEBER

20 / SHARON CARRIGAN

21/ SALLY SIMPSON

22 / ANDREA RICARDS

23 / DANIELLE Dl'TREY

24 / KATHY PLAICHE

25 / BETTY MILES

26 / BECCA ODOM

27 / MARY CARRIGAN

28 / CATHERINE HAGAMAN

29 / SALLIE SCANLAN

30 / LAN DE GENERES
31 / DONNA DICKSON

32 / BECKY RAY

33 / PATTY ADKINS

34 / MIMSEY FITZPATRICK

35 / MARTHA DOVER

36 / O. B. O'BRIEN

37 / B. B.'S BOYFRIEND

38 / MIMI METHVIN

MISSING IN ACTION:

GAIL ADAMS

MARIDEL ALLEN

LOGAN BYRNE

CRAIG CHRISTENSEN

MOLLY DANIEL

MIMI DOSSETT

PAGE ELMORE

NOEL ENGOMEN

INDIA FLEMING

KATHY FREY

BARBARA HALL

JANET HEVTHEHWICK

ITNDA HI<;«;iNS

MEB JACKSON

SL'SAN KAHI.MIS

KATHY KNOPH

KATY KOSTKA

LICY U\NE

sally lines

tibby penn

«;ail perry

bobbi petersen

mary beth plaiche

KATHY POSEY

JACZIE RAMEY

KATHY ROSS

PEGE STERNBERGER

MISSY TENCH

CHRIS TRAXLER

MARY' MARGARET TRAXLER

CARRIE VINCENT

VANNA WARMACK

CANDY WEGENHOFT

DIANE WINGO

BARRY WINN

SYLVIA YOUNG

Chi Omega

Lodges / page 127

f ^^

W^'^-

iO«-i,

hS V

SS9

■

^«

^^— -U

*^'-|H-

vi^Nfl

PJH

■HMjy^y^

iMkM

"iKi fl

0(V ■,■--. -

—

«:'.,a

Li:

.SIM*-

.y L,^

Mk.'. -fl

^B~-_

-w-

^KB ~ K '

■ :

"^ ^fiT^.

S-l

am i"W

■

'St.rr-itea

■

■J

^i^H^H^^HS^^^^^^^^^^E

.■^«#w««^a

1 / STEVE GILMER

2 / CHARLIE IMONTGOIVIERY

3 / ROBBIE FAUST

4 / BILLY GRACE

5 / DAVID L'HOSTE

6 / ALAN SEWART

7 / HARDY RICHARDSON

8 / JOHN KANE

9 / WILLIE WHITE

10 /ANN

11 / SPARKY WELLES

12 / DAVID FAUST

13 / GORDON GSELL

14 / JOHN DANE

15 / ROBIN PUNCHES

16 / RITA

17 / BOB VORHOFF

18 / DORA

19/ ANDY EDWARDS

20 / GEORGE RIVIERE

21 / INDIA

22 / BILLY' WYNN

23 / STEVE FORRESTER

24 / JOHN CROSBY

25 / BILL BRUNDIGE

26 / OSCAR GWIN

27 / DAVID WILLIAMS

28 / CHARLIE MACKIE

29 / RICHARD HAEUSER

30 / PETER ASMUTH

31 / COP PEREZ

32 / CALVIN JONES

33 / SONNY SHIELDS

34 / CHARLIE MILLER

ON LEA^I:

CARL ANDRY

DINKY AITENREITH

TEDDY BARKEKDING

STAN DENEGRE

JACK DENIS

DAVID DE(;RI!Y

JO JOACHIM

SANDY LOWE

HANK LONG

BAHHY ■VIAKRY

BILL M ALLOY

FERNANDO SANCHEZ

CI RT SEH'ART

RIC THISTLE-THWAITE

Delta Kappa Epsilon

Lodges / page 129

Delta Tau Delta

1 / JOHN BAEHR
2 / JOHN MAHONEY
3 / DON SHARP
4/ BOB LEE

5 / DAVID WALKER

6 / PETE EMIGH

7 / BRUCE DANNER
8 / STEVE DANNER

9 / DANNY MCDANIELS

10 / BILL PETERSON

11 / BUDDY ERASER

12 / JIM BARNTHOUSE

13 / DON FREEMAN

14 / DOUG MILLER

15 / PETE KWIATKOW^SKI

16 / RICK CALCOTE

17 / GORDON STONE

18 / BILL FONES

19 / RON NEV^'TON

A.W.O.L.:
HANK BARTON
DAVE BATT
JOE BOAZ

MILLARD BOSWORTH
PAUL CROV*^
DAVID DOLKART
KIM FROSELL
TOM HAYDEN
BOB IRVINE
LEE MOWE
LLOYD MUTTER
EDDIE PRATT
TOM VAN BUSKIRK
DAVID WELLEN
SONNY WHEELAHAN

PAGE 130 / Lodges

^,<,-.^,.iM»»y.«yg:ssaiiJy' W i j. ii VTi-taaift i

1936

i/» -J*

,^-

' f

iitl

r?"

.' 1

ti»*i

• •

■ c

'. 1

•»- - - ^!|l ^

^^jr

■*;-

Kappa Alpha

1 / CHRIS R. SHERIDAN

2 / CHUCK WICKSTROM

3 / ROCKY ROCKSTROH

4 / JIM LANE

5 / LITTLE WILLIE

6 / CHRIS WHITTY

7 / JACK DAMPF

8 / WESLEY DOBRS

9 / OMER DAVIS

10 / JIM FULLER

11 / HOOPER NICHOLS

12 / JOHN PAUL FLEMING

13 / RICHARD FOSTER

14 / SEWELL ELLIOTT

15 / TATHAM HERTZBERG

16 / CRIS BENTON

17 / JOE SCHWARTZEL

18 / VIRGIL FOX

19 / BERRY THOMPSON

20 / JIMMY SHEATS

21 / MARSHALL ORDERMANN

22 / MEADE GRIGC

23 / CLARK CROMWELL

24 / RANDY SMITH

25 / JOE HENDRIX

26 / SCOTTY MILHAS

27 / BILL WEBSTER

28 / RUSS NOLAN

THUANT:

BOB BIRTEL

BUDDY BLUE

TOM CROSBY

JOHN DAVIS

TOM FABACHER

PANCHO FLEMING

WARD HOWARD

BRET LEBRETON

RANDY LEWIS

KING LOGAN

DIXSON "MONTAi.UE

EDDIE ORDERMANN

DICKIE POL< HON

BEN SLATER

CHRIS STEG

RICK TAMPl.IN

ROLY VON KUUNATOWSKI

BILL WIIK.VT

Lodges / page 133

Kappa Alpha Theta

1 / EMMY BARNES

2 / HEATHER WIGGINS

3 / MARILYN MILLWEE
4 / FANNY

5 / CHRIS

6 / JANE ZIMMERMAN

7 / JANIE PARTIN

8 / ANNE MULLER

9 / JENNIFER JAMES

10 / KAREN HEAUSLER

11 / MARGO STOWERS

12 / MARTHA CAMPBELL

13 / CATHY SMALL

14 / BARB DICKSON

15 / ANNE PACKER

16 / MARTHA AZAR

17 / LYNNE TORBERT

18 / BONNIE BRYAN

19 / NANCY CASSADY

20 / CATHY CLARK

21 / PEGGY DILLON

22 / SUSIE FRERE

23 / BETH EXUM

24 / CRICKETT MOORE

25 / SUE SIMONTON

26 / SUELLEN NIXON

27 / BUSS PACKER

28 / PATTY HOUSER

29 / BETTY DILLON

30 / OZ HANSEN

31 / PAT BOYLSTON

32 / SALLY NETTLETON

33 / ALICIA LEONARD

34 / PEGGY BARNES

35 / BETH SMITH

36 / TREVI PEARSON

37 / LIZ WETZEL

38 / MARY SCHOENBERGER

39 / LEILA PERRIN

MISSING:

PEGGY ABRAHAM

CLAUDETTE CAMPBELL

JANE CHAPMAN

MARY MARGARET COURT

DERRY HILL

MARTHA JORDY

ANN KAPLAN

KAREN LAUTZ

LORY LOCKWOOD

JOANNA LOMBARD

CAROL PIPER

DONNA SHERLOCK

KATIE SMITH

GLESE VERLANDER

LAURELLE VERLANDER

MELINDA WEST

MINTA ZULKY

PAGE 134 / Lodges

|HHIH

m n

«^'

»^,

^:s;

'^i

-A>1

0^n

•»//-<

# -^ . >

I / BETH CHILDRESS
2 / JANICE KILLEBREW

3 / SCOTTY SPAAR

4/ KARIN SWENSON

5 / CATHY DALTON

6 / ANN LEWIS

7 / JULIA WEBB

8 / MARTHA SCHULL

9 / JENNY JACKSON

10 / BEV ANDERSON

II / TERRY TERRILL
12 / KATHY ELLIOT

13 / LUCY VAN METER

14 / PAM PARKER

15 / PAULA PERRONE

16 / CINDY' AVEGMANN

17 / REGAN ALFORD

18 / MARY UMLAND
19 / SUZANNE HAYT)EN

20 / MARY' MARTHA CURD

21 / SHIRLEY PRATT

22 / SUSAN BRADLEY

23 / MARTHA SANDERS

24 / ROSIE MCCABE

25 / DEBBIE HEABERLIN

26 / PATSY' MATHIEU

27 / PEACHY' CLARK

28 / BOBBIE LAWRENCE

29 / BARBARA GOTT

30 / KREIS BAILEY

31 / JANET WALLER

32 / LU ANTHONY'

33 / DIANA FOX

34 / SIDNEY' GOODRICH

35 / BOBBIE PROVOSTY
36 / MARCIA PROSSER

37 / LAURA WHITNEY

38 / BRIDGET BRADLEY

39 / ALICE HOLLER

40 / CHRIS HEABERLIN

41 / MARY LOIS SCOFIELD

42 / JOANIE CLONINGER

CLOSET CASES:

JOAN ARBOUR

KATIE BENTON

CHARLOTTE BEYER

SUSAN BROWN

BETSY CAMPBELL

TRICIA CARLOCK

COURTNEY' CURTIS

JEANNIE DOWLING

KATHY HALBOWER

ELLEN HANCKEL

JUDY' HOWARD

SALLY HOWELL

LY'NNE JOHNSTON

LANA KILLGORE

SARAH LATHAM

GAY' LEBRETON

LIBBY MAHORNER

PEGGY MANNING

ALICE MARQUEZ

MUFFIN MAYER

BARRY MCGAHEY

MARCIA MORTENSON

PATTY' NEALON

DONNA PIERCE

SHELLY' SCOTT

JANIE STONE

GIN TAYLOR

SUSAN TUCKER

DEBBIE WILLIAMS

BETSY WHITTEY

Kappa Kappa Gamma

Lodges / page 13'

Kappa Sigma

1 / JACK NAFTEL

2 / STEVE NEWMAN
3 / STEVE KORBECKI

4 / JOHN ERNST

5 / RON BERNEL

6 / BOB COHEN

7 / JOHN HANKINS

8 / MERRILL BROWN

9 / BOB MCBRIDE
10 / JOHN NELHOFF
11/ GERRY GATO

12 / ROBERT OLIVIER

13 / STEVE VOSS

14 / CHRIS HALL

15 / STRETCH LEWIS

16 / SKIP FALGOUT

17 / ANGELO MATTALINA

18 / STEVE SALMON

19 / BOB NIEMERA

20 / JACK LABORDE

21 / BAIRD ARCHBALD

22 / MIKE CALDWELL

23 / JERRY SKINNER

24 / PETE OLIVIER

25 / JIM WITHERSPOON

26 / RICH.ARD GRIFFIN

27 / STEVE SHULTZ

28 / FRED MARTIN

29 / BRUCE GRIMES

30 / CHRIS THOMPSON

31 / CHIP DEWITT

32 / DAN KIESLING

33 / PEPE SAAVADERA

34 / JOEY FAVALORO

LOST:

JOE BL'LLARD
STL CLARK
PAT DIAL
TERRY EDWARDS
ROBERT FLEMING
JOE GENDRON
SCOTT HEAPE
SCOTT KAUFMAN
DAVID KNOX
STEVE MARCELLO
NICK MUSSO
JOHN MUTZIGER
DOUG ROBINSON
JIM THOMPSON
KEVIN WALSH

PAGE 138 / Lodges

^^^^^^^^^^H

^^^^^HH^

— i

-J

■■-

"^ 1

— '^

\&i

-X- —

. .^^

■•*.T

-t

O '^-^

■1

mm.

Wm.

^ ^ Su^ r

^•if-

- .^1

-^fe*:«jli/ii^?

> J

p»«»l

-4

ti^l>01

afc=r ?

•^'if^^KjiJM

■Tm^f^

i^fotM^

— '3?^

r-'\

r%J

;!;?

I -

■ • I — .

jfD'jumvWf

INN

ifri

i-^^

■■-v'^<

■"^^^;

">^-

.^-Cf'.- ■

■■>i:v^

Phi Kappa Sigma

1 / ED FEUILLE

2 / GLENN HELTON

3 / RAY MOON

4 / CLIFF CAMP

5 / PETE GRIFFIS

6 / BILL PRATT

7 / TOM KENNA

8 / SANDY WRAY

9 / JERRY KEEL

10 / HERB VALLON

11 / LEE ROGERS

12 / CHUCK MCKIRRIHAN

13 / JOHN BRADLEY

14 / ALAN LAX

15 / john mccarron

16 / tom pounds

17 / jeremy belong

18 / leo varlander

19 / bob wiggins

20 / ducky riess
21 / john kirchner

22 / clark dur,vnt

23 / david wade

24 / randy pick
25 / kim podkulski

26 / steve faller
27 / dickie feuille

28 / david fabre

29 / pan arvites
30 / alex cunningham

31 / rob oklesian

32 / dean switzer

33 / curt jurgens
34 / :mark holt

35 / john beatty

36 / lke bruner

37 / chris heinrichs

38 / mark lassiter

LACKING:

JACK BONNER

BEN BROWN

CARL FOSTER

BILL GORDON

JIM >ic<:ready

REGGIE MORE
ARTIE RASKIN

Lodges / pace 141

Phi Mu

1 / JANE PEELER

2 / DEBBIE HERRING

3 / PHYLL NUGENT

4 / DENISE CASSENS

5 / MARY MEREDITH

6 / MILLIE PILIE

7 / LILI HOWARD

8 / WENDY KORNEGAY
9 / KAREN MEADOR

10 / ANN RUDOLPH

11 / SUSAN NILES

12 / ANN CARTER VADEN

13 / LYNNE MARTIN

14 / JUSTINE TALLY

15 / CAMILLE ROGERS

16 / CURRIE OVERBY

17 / IBBY PARKS

18 / JAN SHANHOUSE

19 / SUZANNE BARRERE

20 / LYNN LEHNHARDT

21 / GINNY KIMZEY

22 / LISETTE HAYS

23 / BETSY MARSAL

24 / SUSAN ROZANSKI

25 / GAY SIMMONS

26 / KELLY JACKSON

27 / lONE WHITLOCK

28 / LYNNE SCHWOTZER

29 / NANCY KERN

30 / TAMARA VANNOY

31 / NOREL TULLIER

32 / BONNIE MOULTON

33 / MAUREEN WALSH

34 / DOROTHY KEENAN

35 / GAIL BAROUDI

36 / ANNA WADE

37 / BECKY REY

38 / LYNN LANDRUM

39 / MARIANNE LIPSCOMBE

40 / KATHY' TOMBERLIN

41 / EMILY STEVENS

42 / CATHY TERRY

43 / BEAU BOOZER

NOT PRESENT:
MICHELE ASMUTH
HELEN BAILEY
Z. BOURGEOIS
SUSAN COOKE
GWEN DAVIDSON
JANE DOVITH (JYA)
BARBARA ENSENAT
NANCY ESCHETTE
GENI MERRITT
ANN METRAILER
STEPHANIE RAGLAND
SARAH RICHTER
ROMA SIMMONS
KATHY SLOCOMBE (JYA)
LINDA STINNET
PATTY WATSON (JYA)
ALICE WILBERT
NANCY WILLIAMSON
LINDA WOODSON

PAGE 142 / Lodges

11!

z^^^w

't'A^^-tr

♦ • /> f r. . ^^.-^

r's-ii

;? f^.

1^ "^i

r> '

»>.

-m^

\~.-~- ^ :?C£f

^ki

L<^i

l<55>.

1 / CATHY NELSON
2 / ANNE TALHOT
3 / LISA nENNETT
4 / >IARY ANN DAY
5 / SUGAR COKINGS
6 / MARCIA BENNETT
7 / ELLEN CARTER
8 / KAREN CONLEY'
9 / KATHY TEMPLETON
10 / KATHY' FERGUSON
11/ MARY MCKINNEY
12 / JEANIE EACAN
13 / RECKY' WHITTEN
14 / IRENE BRIEDE
15 / CARMEN CRAMER
16 /KIM HARRIS
17 / MARY HELEN POWELL
18 / BETH LEWIS
19 / MARY MARTIN
20 / TRICIA RAMSEY
21 / BOBBIE MAXWELL
22 / TRUDY CROW
23 / DEBBY GADDY
24 / BETH GADDY'
25 / TONI OWEN
26 / JAN SHIPMAN
27 / DEBIE LONG
28 / ERAN PICKENS
29 / JOAN MCMULLEN
30 / JOAN POWELL
31 / LOU ANNA COOTS
32 / SALLY JOHNSON
33 / MARY ELLEN WALLACE
34 / SUZY FIFE
35 / SUSALEE NORRIS
36 / RANDI ECHOLS
37 / MARY' PLAUCHE
38 / SHARON DALOVISIO
38 / TRICIA SAMMONS
40 / ANNE STRACHAN
41 / BARBAR.V BARNARD
42 / KATHY JOHNSON
43 / ANNIE SANCHEZ
44 / DIANE SANDERSON
45 / MARY RICKARD
46 / PAM IVIONAST
47 / DANA ROBINSON
48 / GAIL PRATT
49 / ISABEL JUNCO
50 / ELEONORE LEAVITT

UNDISCERNIBLE:

STEPHANIE ARTHUR

NANCY BACKUS

BEVERLY BENNETT

TERRY BOS WELL

SUSIE BROWN

COURTNEY BURGE

JANET BURNEY

NATALIA COKINOS

LAIRA DEL PAPA

DEBBIE DUTTON

DONNA DYKES

MUFFET FONTE

FONCIE FOWLKES

SANDY GARRARD

VIRGINIA HARRIS

ANNE HIGGINS

NANCY LANDRY

MIMI O'CONNOR

MARIA PARADELLO

DELIA PERRY

CATHY ROSE

LAURIE SALE

HELEN SNEED

MISSY' WEBER

LINDA WILKINSON

LIZ WILLIAMS

Pi Beta Phi

Lodges / page 145

Pi Kappa Alpha

1 / GENE TOMLIN

2 / SKIP BEASLEY

3 / TRICKY DICK SANDERSON

4 / DAVE DAUME

5 / RANDY GONZALES

6 / STEVE SHANKS

7 / MIKE CHRISTIANSEN

8 / GEORGE MARKS

9 / INNOCENT BYSTANDER

10 / JOHN GARISON

11 / FRITZ KNARR

12 / BOB BLEDSOE

13 / HECTOR DEL CASTILLO

14 / ED ROBERSON

15 / LENNY CAROTA

16 / STEVE CURTIS

17 / STEVE SPOMER

18 / PETE SPANN

19 / JOHN HARLAN

20 / ANDY ANDREW^S

21 / JOHN AGNONE

22 / AL CHILDS

23 / BOB BIGHAM

INDISCERNIBLE:
STEVE AKIN
GARY BANKS
VIC BARBIERRI
JOHNNY LEE BURNS
BILL BUSH
BILL DAUME
HAROLD GONZALES
CHAMP HOLLAND
JIMMY DALE KOONTZ
PAUL MALLON
JIM MCNEAL
VIC MISTRETTA
BILL MIZE
GENE PIQUE
STEVE ROMIG
CAM TALLY
SANDY W^EBB
RICK WORRAL
KEVIN WRIGHT

PAGE 146 / Lodges

■■■- --M/

'«v>;...

1 / MRS. EMILE BERTlCri

2 / TIIOM <;ONZALEZ

3 / HAL DECELL

4 / HILLY WESSLER

5 / TIM FARMER

6 / SAM BANKS

7 / LISA

8 / GEORGE NELSON

9 / BOB BROWN

10 / ALEX WOOLDKIDGE

11 / ERNEST MARTIN

12 / MARTY DRAMUS

13 / LARRY JACOBS

14 / ART SMITH

15 / MIKE FLORIE

16 / JACK SPOTTSWOOD

17 / STUART SMITH

18 / BOB JOHNSON

19 / BOB BARBOUR

20 / JOE BRUCE

21 / LEA CRUMP

22 / TOM SMITH
23 / BILL MCGREGOR

24 / JERRY HILL

25 / BILL ANDERSON

26 / STEVE MUNRO

27 / BILL HINCHY

28 / CREW CLEVELAND

29 / RICK RATHBUN

30 / GEORGE BAKER

31 / PAXTON SMITH
32 / MIKE BERTUCCI

33 / ERIC SWANSKN

34 / FRAN NEWBERGER

35 / HUGH MEAGHER

36 / BILL BAILEY

37 / RON BERTUCCI

38 / STEVE PEDEN

39 / DAN FORESTIERE

40 / HILLIARD LAWLER

41 / ACE MULLER

42 / TOBY HECHT

43 / TY TAYLOR

44 / SAM JONES
45 / RICHARD HENRY

46 / B. J. LYON

47 / JEFF KINSELL

48 / MARK WAGNER

49 / HUGH TAYLOR

50 / PEIE BRYDEN

51 / STEVE ROBINSON

52 / CHARLEY FECHTEL

53 / JOHNNY WILLIAMS

54 / JIMMY LEE

55 / MIKE MASON

56 / ROBIN SANDAGE

57 / CARLOS MCINERNEY

58 / JACK SWETLAND

59 / JIM MERRELL

60 / HARRY MOON

IMPEHCEPTIBLE:

MIKE BILLINGSLEY

CLAUDE CLAYTON

STEVE CORTELYOU

BOB DART
GEORGE FERGUSON
JOE GETTYS
JOHNNY GILL
RONNIE GUZMAN
CHUCK HERLIHY
CHARLES MOSS
CRAIG PETERSON
HENRY POTTER
BILL ROBINSON-
CLAY SPENCER
BILLY WEIDNER
BOBBY WESSLER
JOHN WESSLER

Sigma Alpha Epsilon

Lodges / page 149

Sigma Alpha Mu

1 / BARRY WEINER

2 / RICHARD SCHLAISGER

3 / JIJMMY DRESNICK

4 / BRUCE BERMAN

5 / HEFF EFFRON

6 / FRED KERSTEIN

7 / HOWIE HOFFMAN

8 / HUGH RAWN

9 / STAN SHAPIRO

10 / MIKE SHTEAMER

11 / ELLIOT NOW

12 / MIKE ROBBINS

13 / MIKE FREEMAN

14 / STEVE LUKINS

15 / PAUL SILLS

16 / MIKE LEWIS

17 / SANDY BERNES

18 / ROBERT KURLANDER

19 / BOBBY HIRSCH

20 / RICHARD WEINMAN

21 / TRACY ROSEN

22 /JEFF RUBIN

23 / RICHARD BROWDY

UNAPPARENT:
CHUCK AUERBACH
ROBERT BENNO
ALBERT COHEN
PAUL ELLENBOGEN
ALAN GOER
BARRY GOLDSMITH
HOSS HERTZBERG
MERRIL HICKS
LARRY KARP
STEVE KRINGOLD
RICKY LEVENE
JOHN LEVINE
ROBERT LEVY
RICHARD LICHTBLAU
ALLEN RICHARD
RICHARD MILLER
JEFF PETERMAN
BRAD ROLLER
JOHNNY SALSTONE
JOHN SCARPINATO
DANNY SAKOLOFF
KENNY SUTTMAN
ANDY WILK
TED ZELMAN

PAGE 150 / Lodges

\^-.-

•A.

-i -.-

1 / WIESS LEVERT

2 / LEHMAN PREIS

3 / STEVE KRAMER
4 / MARTHA KLEY

5 / ALBERT LOW

6 / RAY BARNHILL

7 / DAVID "L.D." gladden

8 / GOLDEN GARVIN

9 / CHARLEY ZEANAH

10 / TERRY GUILFORD

11/ SIGMA ALPHA EVERYBODY

12 / STEWART KEPPER

13/ BERNIE CHILL

14 / MARC STONECIPHER

15 / PAUL MOGABGAB

16 / STEVE WOLFE

17 / S'i'D MILLER

18 / BILL WRIGHT

19 / STEVE BROOKSHER

20 / NORMAN VINN

21 / DON SOMMERS
22 / FRED LFVAUDAIS

23 / HUGH "flame" BLANCHARD

24 / STEPHEN MOGABGAB

25 / JOE BROWN

26 / JEFF ARMITAGE

27 / CARL LEEDY

28 / STEVE MEYER

29 / BRIAN MUELLER

30 /RICK WHITTINGTON

31 / BOB CHAPMAN

32 / ELI HOWELL

33 / GUITAR RAY

34 / MIKE STANTON

35 / REED FARMER

36 / MANNING CURTIS

37 / JERRY CLARK

38 / KENNY MARTINEZ

39 / WALT GRUNDY

40 / FRANK BURNSIDE

41 / DABNEY EWIN

42 / JOHN MUELLER

43 / WENDEL STOtFT

44 / PHIL SCHWARTZ

45 / BILL SEALY

46 / RICK SMITH

47 / DAVIS WOODS

NON-APPARENT:

BOB FATOVIC

jrvr CARTS

BILL HEMETER

TIM HUMMEL

DAVEY MATTISON

BILL MCDONNELL

LARRY SHEA

MACKIE SHILSTONE

STEVE SLADE

MONTY SMITH

ALAN SPROWELS

LEE TERRELL

RONNIE TOMPKINS

SiCMA Chi

Lodges- / pace 153

Sigma Delta Tau

1 /ANDY SERVOS

2 / ELYSSE LEVITOV

3 / DEBBIE POLLACK

4 / PHYLLIS GUTTERMAN
5 / SUZY PASCH

6 / JOANNE BERLIN

7 / CLAUDI PRICE

8 / ALICE WEIL

9 / NANCY SWIREN

10 / KAREN BAUMGARTEN

11 / ANITA JARRETT

12 / BONNIE WEITZENKORN

13 / DEBBIE SHACKLETON

14 / SALLY SHUSHAN

15 / LIN CHURNEY

16 / JUDY HERMAN

17 / DEBBY GOODMAN

18 / CAROL SHURE

19 / SHERRY BENDER

20 / SUSAN SACKS

21 / DEBBIE RACHLIN

22 / LAURIE SHERMAN

23 / JAN DRESKIN

24 / RONDA FRIEDLANDER

25 / JAYCE MAYERS

26 / JEAN EICHENBAUM

27 / JULIE FORB

28 / DEBBY HARTZMARK

29 / CAROL SELONICK

30 / PEGGY BLACKMAN

31 / SARA SHACKLETON

32 / DONNA GOUSS

33 / SUNIE LASKY

34 / EVE KOVEN

35 / AVA SEGAN

36 / DEBBIE INKLES

57 / SANDY BLUMENFELD

38 / JAN JACKERSON

39 / KAREN MILZER

40 / BETTY SOLNICK

41 / JUDI JACOBS

42 / JUDY WESTON

43 / BARB KAPLAN

44 / RIEDY LUSTIG

45 / LYNN HODES

OUT OF SIGHT:
PUDDIN BROWN
BARBAR ELM AN
WENDY GOLDBERG
ELLIN GOODMAN
ROBBIE GORDON
PEGGY KOVEN
PAULA MICHAEL
MILLIE PELOFSKY
GAIL ROSOFF
GENIE ROTH
CYNDI SHOSS
STEPHANIE SWERDLIN
SHERRY WILENSKY

PAGE 154 / Lodges

1 / TOM HARMOUTH

2 / HUDSON SMITH

3 / HARRY MACEY

4 / BILL STECBAUER

5 / STEVE JONES

6 / DAVE CAREY

7 / BABBETT

8 / ST. ANN

9 / HOLLY

^0 / JOHN IIYSLOP

11 / KIT

12 / LESLIE

13 / CAROL

14 / SID JACOBSON

15 / PHIL FANT

16 / JOHN MILLER

17 / SID MARLOW

18 / PAT HERRINGTON

19 / KEN VOSS

20 / LANSING EVANS

21 / TIM RATHBUN

22 / ANN

23 / MIKE VERON

24 / LARRY COMISKY

25 / ROSALIE

26 / WES DOBRIAN

27 / JOE WALLACE

28 / SALLY

29 / WILEY PATTERSON

30 / STEVE JOHNSON

31 / MIKE BOONE

32 / DOUG JOHNSON

33 / SCOTT DERICK

34 / JIM TUDOR

35 / GLEN MCELROY

36 / SCOTTY

37 / LEWIS ROACH

38 / BETSY

39 / ERIC DOERRES

40 / LADSON WEBB
41 / TONY THOMAS

42 / HAL CROCKER

43 / KATHY'

44 / GORDON CAIN

45 / ANN

46 / CLIFF HORNBACK

47 / FRANK KINDER

48 / NANCY

49 / BUTCH BAKER

50 / MITCH SCHER
51 / MIKE RICHARDSON

52 / ROB STUIVI

53 / MARY

54 / JACKIE

55 / JOHN DRYE

56 / RICHARD LESTER

57 / TOM SINKS

NOT IN SIGHT:

DANA ABBOTT

MIKE CUTSHAW

DOAK FOSTER

SCOTT GARDNER

BILL KRUCKS

BRIAN MCGINNIS

RON MCGINNIS

SAM MILNE

RUDY MURPHY

P. J. PAPALE

KEVIN PYLE

PHIL SAVOLE

ED WOLFF

Sigma Nu

Lodges / page 157

Sigma Pi

9
10/
11/
12/
13/
14/
15/
16/
17/
18/
19/
20/
21/
22/

MITCH BARBER

TIP THIEDEMAN

TAYLOR BERRY

MARK KARPOFF

DON RANDOLPH

JERRY STAHLER

JOHN YOUNG

TOM MEACHAM

CHARLES TERRACINA

STEVE WATKINSON

PETE BOCK

LAWRENCE CHISOLM

RON CARO

NORMAN MATSUZAKI

CHRIS MODENBACH

MRS. GEORGIA WILLIAMS

DAVE RUBIN

DAN HORTON

PAM GIARDINA

STEVE WEBB

DRUE WANDS

DAN MAUTHE

UNAVAILABLE :
DENNIS DERBES
STEVE GALE

PAGE 185 / Lodges

>i>fe

. -V >

'i~^

■•-•.•t«*i

/-^/^^ 'i

^ .^r

< \ N-I . 'V,:^*;.

■^•■'ii

FrTini

III BF

aei^ «^

■ ---

^^B -~..._^,- ■

B^^^- — '

^H''

^H 1

JSliifi

h:^E

~-fr ■ ■ ^R

-r

,rL

l^5B»l

^ r-

«^

' ^ >.-J

■■■• 1^

T^J

gajagj',. ■,

I / SKIP HURLEY
2 / JEFF GARTH

3 / RICK WEISS

4 / ALAN WAGIVER

5 / MIKE ISRAEL

6 / ERIC SAWYER

7 / LOIV GOODMAN

8 / SETH MICHELSON

9 / LIN FARMER

10/ (crazy) DALE HILDING

II / STEVE KATZ
12 / RANDY WINN

13 / LEE GOODMAN

14 / DOUG WILDER

15 /KEN SIMONS

16 / BOB GREENSTEIN

17 / PETE SCHAUMBERG

18 / NORM MARCUS

19 / SCOTT ELLIS

20 / BILL BEHRENDT

21 / FRED SUSSMAN

UNSEEN:

JEFF BASEN

AL BERGER

CHARLIE DUKE

BRUCE FINK

PAT FLORY

MEL GOLDIN

JEFF HACKER

JOHN HEYMAN

PETER JACOBSON

GARY KAPLAN

ANDY KASSMAN

BRUCE KRELL

JIM MARKS

JOEL MARX

ELON POLLACK

JIM RICHELER

AL SWARTZBACH

SCOTT SLOMIN

SANDY SMILES

SIDNEY S. SUNTAC

ANDY WELLS

LEO WIZNITZER

ALAN YESNER

STEVE ZAGOR

STEVE ZETLEY

Tau Epsilon Phi

Lodges / page 161

^rr

1 / B. J. HARRIS
2 / SUNNY

3 / MARK DAVIS

4 / JAY GRUBER

5 / CRAIG WEIL

6 / RANDY MARCUS

7 / LARRY AND BOURBON SLUNG
8 / DON WORLY

9 / JAY ANTIS

10 / STEWART ARMSTRONG

11 /TOM SAUNDERS

12 / "whoosh" FISCHER

13 / BRUCE HILL

14 / DAVID SILVERS

15 / BOB BONO

16 / ERON EPSTEIN

17 / JIM LEWIS

18 / RON FELLMAN

19 / MARTY BARIS

20 / CRAIG PEARLMAN

Zeta Beta Tau

21 / BOB LEVY

22 / JEFF PERLMUTTER

23 / ALAN BEYCHOK

24 / STEVE BENZULY

25 / ALAN BERGER

26 / MICHAEL WEINSTOCK

27 / STEVE CAVALIER

28 / LARRY HAMBURG

29 / "HOLLYWOOD" SOMERSTEIN

30 / JOHN BAUM "F.M."

31 / BARRY "p.m." ARGINTAR

32 / RANDY GALANTI

33 //DAVID ROSS

34 / RICKY KANFER

35 / RICKY HIRSCH

36 / STEVE "fro" LAVEN

37 / TED BISKIND

38 / RANDY UNGAR

39 / BOB DIAMOND

40 / ALAN ORKIN

41 / GARY JONES

42 / "MILHUNKIE" SCHWAB

43 / BENNY EICHHOLZ

44 / HOWARD REISMAN

45 / SCOTT GINSBURG

46 / BOB GROSSMAN

INDISTINGUISHABLE :
RONNIE ARONOFF
DAVID BAUMAN
STEVE BAUMAN
ALAN BURTON
SHELDON CANTOR
MARTY DETTELBACH
RICK DOBKIN
BRUCE FEINGERTS
DAVID FINKEL
FLIP FRANK
IRA FRANK
MAX FRIDMAN
JOHN HASPEL
DOUG HERTZ
DAVID HESDORFFER
LARRY JOSEPHSON
LARRY KAISER
EDDIE KATZ
GLENN KATZ
JAY KAYSER
PAUL LASKY
CHUCK LEANESS
WALTER LEVY
LEE LEVINSON
DON LINSKY
PAUL LUBIN
DAVID MAGRISH
LEON MARKS
RUSTY PALMER
STEVE PORDY
NED PRICE
DANNY RASKIN
JAY SCHILLER
JIM SNIDER
MIKE STERN
PHIL STYNE
MICKEY WALL
GORDY WEIL
KEN WEIL
GARY WEISS
MATT ZALE.

PAGE 162 / Lodges

M>.>

itii-

.Ulinif

5 ci: Millilk'j-MSff^if'^ '

-ifc^

)

>«v.

^**^

•^.J

•J

;!^-

>^.f*fe>'

r-*'-

% »

•-•••' k .'■!«,

„m Actio" "^"S""

SECOND

PRINI

The
Problems

and
Prospects

LSD

IHOM«llMf'ff«J'i

;^'^--".'"'r„Tr««-" ;

t-ruA ct'-* iwt*^'

^ ,. w» t«» •" ""r; d -which "*•

CH*«l« C rw.»*s

^r. »■"■ '"•' "^ »^ *• "^

^il.

NON-MEDICAL
« -^ OF DRUGS

■^

l!f

Phi Alpha Delta:

IIORACIO ALFARO AROSEMENA
ERNEST E. BARROW
WILLIAM T. BENHAM
RICARDO A. BILONICK
EARLE L. BLIZZARD
GLENN E. BRADFORD
MICHAEL D. COSSEX
DANIEL R. DEL PRIORE
ANDREW F. DORA, JR.
SHIRLEY EGAN
RICHARD L. EPSTEIN
RONALD J, FAHRENBACHER
CALVIN L. FOX
DAVID E. GOLIA
WALDON M. HINGLE
CHARLES B. HAHN, JR.
EUGENE M. KATZ
JEANNE F. KRUEGER
HAROLD B. KUSHNER
JOHN L. LANDREM, JR.
ROBERT A. LEE
HELTON G. MARSHALL
PATRICIA A. MATHES
WILLIAM R. MORGAN
MICHAEL T. PAWLUS
ROBERT A. PEARSON
JOHN A. POINDEXTER
ABBOTT J. REEVES
DANNY K. HESTER
HARRY A. ROSENBERG
JAMES V. SCARLATA
STEPHEN B. SHARBER
DAVID B. SPENCER
HELEN L. SULLIVAN
WALTER C. THOMPSON, JR.
GEORGE H. TROXELL, III
JAMES M. WALLEY
JAMES C. WILSON

Phi Delta Phi

PHILIP ALLEN

WILEY LASTRAPES

WILLIAM ALLISON

C. LAYTON

HARRY ANDERSON

CHARLES LECHE

ALEXANDER ASHY

FRANK LOMBARDO

PHILIP AZAR

GEOFFREY LONGENECKER

BRANK BARRY

CHARLES LOZES

JOHN BAUM

ROBERT MANARD

BRIAN BEGUE

JON >IASSEY

DARRYL BERGER

EARL MCCALLON

LEONARD BERINS

EDWARD MCCLOSKEY

HENRY BERNSTEIN

EDMUND MCILHENNY

EARL BLIZZARD

MALCOLM ME-i-ER

HAROLD BLOCK

MACHALE MILLER

GERALD BOSWORTH

BRAINARD MONTGOMERY

JOHN BRODERS

RICHARD MONTGOMERY

RANDALL BROOKS

B. NOEL

ROBERT CASEY

RALEIGH OHLMEYER

EDWARD CASTAING

JEREMIAH O'KEEFE

WILLIS CAUDLE

MICHAEL O'KEEFE

HUGH CHERRY

TORGER OMDAHL

RUTLEDGE CLEMENT

MARSHALL ORDERMANN

RICHARD CHRISTOVICH

LYLE PHILLIPSON

GEORGE CROUNSE

JOHN PICKRON

INMOND DEEN

n. POUDRIER

DEE DRELL

WALLACE QUINN

DAVID EDWARDS

JAMES ROSS

PETER EVERETT

JERRY SAPORITO

jim:\iy farwell

JOHN SAUNDERS

MICHAEL FITZPATRICK

DAN SCHEUERMANN

PAUL GAROFALO

EDWIN SCHLESINGER

DIEGO GIORDANO-ECHEGOYEN

KEVIN SCHOENBERGER

JEFF HACKER

DONALD SHINDLER

HARRY HARDIN

ERNEST SMALLMAN

RONALD HARRIS

IRVIX; SIINAIDER

ROBERT IIEARIN

THOMAS SPROTT

HARRY HENDERSON

JOHN STEINER

HENRY JUMONVILLE

LOUIS TRENCHARD

WILLIAM KAMMER

LEE WALLACE

DAVID KERSTEIN

ROBERT WIEGAND

k<m;fk landhol:m

.) WIKS WILSON

JOHN I.ANDREM

1 KVNK VOHAN. JR.

Lodges — School of Law / page 165

Phi Chi

DAVE ABBOTT

GARY EPLER

AL LOTMAN

GREER RICKETSON

RICHARD ANDERSON

CHARLIE FISCHMAN

MIKE MAFFETT

GENE ROSENBERG

TOM ANDERSON .

ROB FLANDRY

NEIL MANowrrz

JIM SHELLEY

HANK ARNOLD

JACK FLEET

JOE MARNELL

CHRIS SKINNER

RALPH ASBURY

BARRY FRAME

ART MATTHEWS

CLAY SKINNER

ALVIN AUBRY

JOE GARCIA-PRATS

CRAIG MAUMUS

JASON SMITH

JESSE AUSTIN

VIC GARCIA-PRATS

PAUL MEYER

JIM SMITH

STEVE BAHOE

BEN GUIDER

LEE MCAMIS

STEVE SORGEN

RON BARBIE

PAUL GULBAS

HOWARD MOORE

JODY SOSNOW

BOB BAXTER

DICK HALL

TED MOORE

GEORGE STELLING

KEN BREWINGTON

TOM HARPER

JIM MOROCK

DENNIS SUICH

BILL BUTLER

JOHN HESS

KEN MULLEN

BOB TANNER

STAN CARSON

BILL HOCKING

MAURICE NASSER

BILL THOMPSON

RICH CAVIN

JERRY HOLLEMAN

HAL NEELY

BOB TOFTE

ART CHANG

GARY HOLT

DON NOVICK

LARRY TRUE

JOE CHIAPELLA

PRESLEY JACKSON

ART NUSSBAUM

JOHN TURBA

GEORGE CHU

DAN JACOB

BILL OLSON

MIKE WALSH

BILL COLEMAN

CHARLIE JOHNSON

DAVE OLSON

JIM WATTS

KEN COMBS

BOB KAMINSKI

JIM OWEN

JIM WEAVER

JIM COOK

ROCKY KENT

LAT PARKER

BRITTON WEST

JOHN COOPER

CRAIG KESSLER

JIM PATTERSON

LEE WINE LAND

JOHN CURTISS

WAYNE LARRABEE

LOU POPEJOY

CRAIG WINKEL

DALTON DIAMOND

JEFFREY LAU

BILL RAWLINGS

JOHN WINTER

JON EDWARDS

BOB LIPSON

JOHN REA

JOHN YOUNGBERG

DAVE ELWONGER

CHARLIE LONG

WHIT READER

Alpha Kappa Kappa

Phi Delta Epsilon

PETER BREIDENBACH
MICHAEL DESHAZO
WAYNE HENRY
DREW LOGUE
MIKE LUNDY
JOE MCCRARY
MORRIS MANN
LARRY MATSUMOTO
JOHN STOVER
LARRY SPRATLING

Nu Sigma Nu

LOWELL BARECK

GARY JANKO

JEROME BLACKMAN

JAN KAUFMAN

JANICE BLUMENTHAL

IVRI KUMIN

RICHARD EPSTEIN

HAL ROSENBLATT

LARRY GALINKIN

DONALD ROSENBLUM

ERIC GEWOLB

S. ANDREW SCHWARTZ

MICHAEL GOLDBERG

RICHARD SILVER

PETER GOLDMAN

RICHARD STROBACH

KEN GORDON

STEVEN TAYLOR

DAVID HAFT

DAVID WILENSKY

MICHAEL HIGGINS

MICHAEL ZOLLER

GEORGE HOFFMAN

LAURENCE AREND

ART FOUGNER

WILLIAM LACORTE

BILL REED

LARRY BARNES

BOB GRIFFITH

JAY MAGGIORE

JAMES SAALFIELD

RODNEY BARNHART

THOMAS GRIMSTAD

DONALD MAHONEY

RICHARD «ABATIER

STEPHEN BINNS

WARREN HAGAN

HARVEY MARICE

WOODY SANDERS

BOB BLANDENSHIP

GEORGE HARRIS

JOHN MARTIN

DAVID SANDERSON

STEPHEN BRINT

STEVE HARRIS

PHIL MCKINLEY

FRED SCHERT

RANDY BUCHANAN

STEVE HARRISON

DAVID MCLAIN

MARSHALL SCHREEDER

WILL BUFFAT

THOMAS HAWK

BOB MERIWETHER

RANDY SEYBOLD

BILL CALDWELL

JOHN HOBBS

HOWARD MILLER

JOHN SIMMONS

BOB CARD

ROBERT HOSEA

ROBERT MILLER

BILL SLAUGHTER

BOB CLARK

THOMAS HOWARD

GARY MORRISON

KEN SMITH

BILL CLARKE

JOHN HUDNALL

JIM MURPHY

MARVIN SMITH

RONALD CYGAN

PAUL HUNT

CHARLES O'MARA

ARNOLD SPANJERS

GARY DANOS

WALTER JAMES

WILLIAM O'MARA

BILL SPENCER

THOMAS DAVIS

ROBERT JEFFERS

RICHARD OTTS

LAMAR TEAFORD

GEORGE DESORMEAUX

WILLIAM JOHNSON

PAUL PACE

TIM TRICHE

PAT DOLAN

JIM JOHNSTON

ROBERT PATYRAK

JAMES TUCKER

REA VIS EUBANKS

SCOTT KELLERMANN

RICHARD PERRYMAN

BILL TURNER

RICHARD EVANS

JAMES KNOEPP

PETE PROSSER

ROBERT WALLACE

BRICE FISICHELLA

RICHARD WESTFAL

PAGE 166 / Lodges — School of Medicine

'•N

.■y '•

^/f • .£j^ ^^

..^'

r ^

•><*1_-

»>^-

-,v

1 --^

f 4

't.

•1^

I^H

^Im

^iy^

^v-'

^•t??l

"'Sait, ]

JAMBALAYA 1971

EDITOR
MATT ANDERSON

PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLICES

FRANCISCO ALECHA, WYLIE DAWSON,

PATRICIA HOPKINS, AND SHEILAH SILVER

HELPING HANDS

LISA BENNETT, JOHN BLEHAR, ANNE BOUDREAUX,
DIANE BURNSIDE, GAYLE CARP, MISSY CHEESEMAN,
JEAN COLEMAN, MARIA DAVIS, JIM DUNNIGAN,
TERRY EDWARDS, ELLEN HANCKEL, JOHN JAMES,
LUCY LANE, KAREN LAUTZ, SUZANNE LEBLANC.
SUZANNE LIGHTER, DEBIE LONG, KIT LOZES, AARON
NAVAH, PAULA PERRONE, SANDY' RUBIN, TAMMY
SINDLER, AND KATHY TEMPLETON

PHOTOGRAPHY

MATT ANDERSON/ cover, 2, 4, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 23,
26, 30, 33, 36, 39, 44, 45, 47, 67, 70, 72, 73, 74, 76
(bottom), 77, 78, 79 (bottom), 82, 83, 84, 85, 86,
89, 90, 104, 105, 106 (top), 107 (bottom), 115,
121, 122, 125, 126, 132, 136, 139, 144, 152.
BUDDY brimberg/ 22, 34, 62, 65. jim dunnigan/
15, 21, 24, 38, 40, 63, 68 (sequence), 69. farrell
hockemeier/ 10, 11, 12, 18 (lop), 27, 29, 35, 37,
41, 49. JOHN JAMES/ 31, 32, 58, 60 (top), 80 (bot-
torn), 91, 117, 155, 160. PAT PRINS/ 16, 54-57.
MIKE SMITH/ 6, 7, 8, 9, 25, 28, 42, 50, 51, 52, 53,
59, 60 (bottom), 66, 68 (middle), 71, 75, 76 (lop),
79 (top), 80 (lop), 81, 88, 89, 92, 94, 96, 98, 99,
100, 103, 104, 105, 106 (bottom), 107 (top), 108-
113, 118, 128, 131, 135, 140, 143, 147, 148, 151,
156, 159, 163, 164, 167, 168. georce welch/ 43.

^STI

AIMS

JAMBALAWV

UNIVERSITY

LOUISIANA

4 / THE YEAR OF THE GREEN:
FRO>I LIBBOCK TO >IE.^IPHIS
38 / BASKETBALL
44 / GYMNASTICS
46 / S\^ liVnHNG
50 / TRACK
54 / TENNIS
58 / GOLF
60 / BASEBALL
64 /VARSITY SCORES
66 / SAILING CLUB
70 /BARRACUDA CLUB
71 / SCI BA CLIB
72 /NATIONAL >IOOT COURT

73 /DEBATE CLUB

74 / SOCCER CLUB
76 RT GBY

78 INTRA>Il RALS
78 PAN-HEL SPORTS

80 CI n? SCORES

82 SIT DENT SENATE

81 I.F.C.

8.^ PAN-HELLENIC

In case you

did not happen

to notice any of

the 20,000 decals,

8,000 window posters,

50,000 bumper stickers,

150,000 schedule cards,

50,000 lapel pins, or 500,000

billing stutters, 1970 was the

Year of the Green. The success

enjoyed by the Green Wave on the gridiron

in 1970 was anticipated by a mammoth publicity campaign

that proclaimed that 1970 would be the year the drought ended. The advertising program was a success

because interested alumni and local media officials donated freely of their time, talent, and facilities.

During the summer, the slogan proclaiming that 1970 was the Year of the Green appeared on billboards,
public transit, and radio and television broadcasts, all of the space and time donated to the University
at cost. The fact that the drought did end in 1970 is a tribute to Tulane's football team; the fact that
it did not go unnoticed is a tribute to a group of dedicated alumni and citizens concerned with the future
of their University.

•

-G. P. L.
April 27, 1971

PAGE 4 / Varsity Sports

From Lubbock
to Memphis

Gayle Patrick Letulle
& Matt Anderson

/ PAGE 5

-t

"We have to win

. we neech§p,

,000 in the Stadium next weeit."

—Dr. Rix Yard

s^^ Director of Atlij^y^^

'-^

<Ti,.....-'-7'."Ky.5^

PAGE 6 / Varsity Sports

The Year ot the Green moved \fom the practice field to
Texas Tech's pHush artitical turit on September 12. 1970.
The jitters normally present lor the opening o( a new
season were multiplied on this mugg^5ummer evening
by the importance of this particular sea^n to the future
o( Tulane football. Quite a bit o( time and energy had
been expended in the promotion of this TulaW football
team as a legitimate winner and the time had cdnie to
prove it <

Things looked good for a while as Tulane look a 14-74
lead into the fourth quarter but the Red Raiders struck
twice (in the last nine minutes of play.) to lake a 21-14
victory. "We were a desperate football team after that
loss to Texas Tech," linebacker Ricky Kingrea
reminisced after the season. "Before the game we
didn't leel that anyone could beat us . . . but that fourth
quarter collapse brought us down to earth, and we were
a better football team (or it. Tailback David At>ercrombie
picked up 117 yards running (rom the Green Wave's
newly installed "I " lormation and the defensive unit
looked sharp as Joe Bullard picked off the, first two of
an eventual team record 28 Interceptions "ruiane would
make during the season. " »

-G.P.L.

Tulane Stadium /September 19th

"It's going to be a little wet out there tonight. The grass Is wet. The footing seems real good.
So, relax and try to take care of the football. Take care of that football when you're getting hit

and when you're catching the football.

The main thing we need to do, men, is go out there and play our game of football. Our

aggressive, balls out game of football. This is the way we've practiced; this is the way we should

play. And the thing about is— we ought to go out there and have a lot of fun. Let's not go out

there and take chances. Let's go out there and have a lot of fun and knock those bulldogs' tails

off. We'll get some points on that scoreboard! And then we'll have a hell of a lot of fun! Right?

This is the only way to play the game. Go out there and have a lot of fun and

get after their ass and keep at it for the entire 60 minutes. We can't for one minute let down.

And remember as I told you yesterday: should a break go against you, and they get something

good happening to them, it is a 60 minute ballgame, and we're going to play it for 60 minutes

this week. Do all of you agree that you are going to play for 60 minutes? {Team: "Yes, sir!")

Alright! Let's go out there and get them!"

—Coach Pittman

PAGE 8 / Varsity Sports

i'^'k ''«^,^«^

'*.■■ ■■ »

k-J^ - Jrp 1 * *■ "^Cmi^^lH^^^H

Rix Yard had to settle for a crowd of 30,000
fans, but nonetheless, the Year of the Green
began to pick up steam as the Wave opened
its home stand with a 17-14 victory over
Georgia The Bulldogs did all of their scoring in
the first half on a 62 yard punt return, a two
point conversion and a pair of field goals.
Tulane scored only once in the first half on the
first play after rover Joel Henderson recovered
a Georgia fumble which had been forced by a
fierce punt rush. Fullback Bob Marshall raced
Into the end zone from 11 yards out for the
score.

The Green Wave continued to peck away at
the Bulldog lead in the third quarter, with
heads-up defensive play figuring prominently in
the comeback. An interception by sophomore
linebacker Glenn Harder at the Bulldog 27 on
the second play of the period set up the tying
touchdown, scored by quarterback Greg
Gleason on a one yard sneak seven plays later.
Joe Bullards third interception of the season
came a bit later in the third quarter and set up
a 26 yard field goal by Lee Gibson that proved
to be the margin of victory. Things got a bit
heated in a scoreless fourth period, as the
Green Wave successfully fought to insure that
a 35-0 licking administered by the Bulldogs the
previous season would be properly avenged.

-G.P.L.

/ P.VGE 9

Memorial
Stadium/

September 26th

A wet, wintry day greeted the kickoff
of the Tulane-lllinois game in Cham-
paign, but the off track did not bother
Joe Bullard. The junior defensive
back forged into the national leader-
ship in interceptions as he picked off
three lllini passes to raise his season
total to six. He then capped off an
already sensational performance
with an unbelievable 77 yard punt
return that insured a 23-9 Tulane
victory. The game film revealed that
Bullard evaded no less than eight
Illinois tacklers as he swept down the
sidelines en route to paydirt and an
award of the game ball from his
teammates.

A field goal and a one yard sneak
by outstanding Illinois sophomore
quarterback Mike Wells staked the
lllini to an early 9-0 lead, but Tulane
wiped that out with a 32 yard field
goal by Lee Gibson at the close of
the first half, and a 20 yard touch-
down scamper by Abercrombie at
the beginning of the third period. The
fourth quarter opened with Tulane
on the march, climaxing as quarter-
back Greg Gleason tossed a one
yard touchdown pass to tight end Art
Ledet, standing alone at the rear of
the end zone. Bullard's punt return
later in the fourth period put the final
nail in the lllini coffin. The following
Tuesday, Tulane's name appeared
for the first time on the Associated
Press' list of the top thirty teams in
the nation.

-G.P.L.

Nippert Stadium /October 2nd

■>*ssersrVT

The Green Wave made it three wins in a row with a heart-stopping 6-3
victory over the surprisingly tough Cincinnati Bearcats. Tulane amassed
its highest offensive yardage total of the season in the contest, but all
assaults on the Bearcat goalline failed until sophomore quarterback Mike
Walker came off the bench to guide his mates on a 75 yard march to
paydirt midway through the fourth period. Walker completed five of six
pass attempts during the drive, hitting split end Mike Paulson with a
23 yard strike for the winning score. Dame Fortune notwithstanding,
an unyielding defense (that wound up sixth in the nation) merited most
of the praise for the Green Wave's three game win string.

-G.P.L.

'*W* w*r« f«al lodurut* lo com* ofl
thai fWd lonighL bvcaus* w* dktnl
pl«T wflll We made way too many
mistahvt- We |u*t wefen'i rea<ty to
play and make (bote hind ol
mistake* We were real lucky thai we
won the lootbali game Now. a wm •
a win. txjl you can b«l your att. that
we're nol ready to play rveil we efc .
when we go lo Cdofado Springs . . .
or we're goir^ to be a tad group.
They ve got a hell ol a lootbali leam.
that's rated ten in the nation We
were real lorlunale tonight, and il
you want lo g«l a lot of altonlion jutl
step up there ar>d choose one ol
those learns in the top ten arxJ
knock their asses oft And III
guarantee you that you wtN get all
kifKJs ol f«cogntttor\,'*

—Coach PIttman

/ PACE 11

Falcon Stadium
/October 10th

"We've got a challenge out there today, and
of course, as I told you earlier, the hat ought
to be on those people because they're the
ones who are nationally rated. We came in
here to take that away from them. That's
the only reason we came up here, to get
at them and play the good ball game that
we're capable of playing, free of mistakes.
If we do this for the entire 60 minutes, men,
well, then we can win this football game .

. . . Don't worry about the weather. The
only thing that we're concerned about is
those people across the line of scrimmage
from us. . . . As talked about it earlier, you
might get winded the first minute or two of
the ball game, but we'll come back. Don't
worry about that. We've practiced a hell of
a lot of afternoons. We've run a lot of sprints
when It was hard to breathe, haven't we?
And we've always managed to run one or
two more. So this is where you've got to
suck it up, and then that air will come back
to you. . . ."

—Coach Pittman

Tulane's mid-season clash with unbeaten
and nationally ranked Air Force provided the
Green Wave with an opportunity to grab a
little national acclaim for itself, not to men-
tion a chance to impress bowl selection
committees. The Green Wave blew that
chance in a disappointing 24-3 loss. From
this point on. the pressure continued to build
as each succeeding contest became crucial
to the team's hopes of a post season invite.

'■|'ifyu^.y^^w,

^J>k^ ^ ^^ ^

Tulane's defense in the loss to Air Force was almost as
good as its offense was bad and that's saying a lot. With two
offensive line starters out with injuries and number one rusher
David Abercrombie playing sparingly because of an attack of
influenza, the Green Wave's offensive unit sputtered to its
lowest output of the season (131 yards), fumbling eight times
in the process.

The Falcons came into the game with the number one pass-
ing attack in the nation, but managed only 159 yards through
the air against 'Bullard's Bandits." Safety Paul Ellis accounted
for two of the Green Wave's four interceptions. The Falcons,
however, did manage to complete the only touchdown pass
thrown against Tulane in 1970. but the Wave defense showed
It could hold Its own against the best. Another thing the Air
Force loss showed was that Tulane, without David Abercrom-
bie, was a team without an effective offense, a fact that became
painfully obvious two weeks later in rainy Atlanta.

-G.P.L.

/ PAGE 13

Tulane Stadium
/October 17th

Sophomore quarterback Mike
Walker got his first collegiate
starting assignment against the

North Carolina Tar Heels and
made good, passing the Green
Wave to a 24-17 victory. The win
was an important one since a
second consecutive loss would
probably have eliminated Tulane
from consideration for a bowl
invite. Walker got a little help
through the airways from tailback
David Abercrombie, who threw a
74 yard option pass to wingback
Steve Barrios on the second play
from scrimmage, staking the Green
Wave to an early 7-0 lead. North
Carolina used the running of
All-American Don McCauley to tie
it up and then went ahead by
converting a fumble recovery into
a 20 yard field goal. But Walker
came back with a strong air game
that brought the Green Wave
down to the Tar Heel goal line and
finally snuck over from the two
yard line to give Tulane a 14-10
halftime lead.

Walker's 28 yard strike to split end
Mike Paulson set up a 21 yard
Tulane field goal in the third
period, but the running of
McCauley led to another Tar Heel
touchdown and a 17-17 deadlock.
A 42 yard pass from Walker to
Barrios and a one yard plunge by
David Abercrombie accounted for
a 43 yard drive that produced the
winning score for Tulane. North
Carolina came back with a
desperation drive down to the
Tulane five yard line in the dying
minutes of the contest but the
Green Wave made a stand to
preserve the victory. The
emergence of Walker as an
offensive leader marked a turning
point in the effectiveness of a
Tulane passing attack that
heretofore had been a sore
disappointment.

-G.P.L.

PAGE 14 / Varsity Sports

/ PAGE 15

Grant Field
/October 24th

". . . Men, the weather conditions aren't the best in the world, but it is the
same for Georgia Tech as it is for us. The thing we want to do is take care
of the football . . . the kicking game is going to be a real important phase
of this game under these conditions, so we have got to play our kicking game
right up to the hilt. We've got to handle the kicking situation with a lot of
poise and a lot of confidence . . .

. . . men, we've got a lot at stake out there, and we've got the ability to
go out there and get it. All that it amounts to Is that real fine effort. Let's
go out there and play a tough one and get after their ass. Let's take it on
out . . ."

—Coach Pittman

PAGE 16 / Varsity Sports

The bowl pressure continued to mount as Tulane and Georgia Tech, both
with 4-2 records, met in a game that would virtually assure the winner of
a post season invitation,

A devastating downpour greeted this clash between the two top ranked
Independents in the South, and the two teams sloshed into the fourth quarter
in a scoreless deadlock, Tulane seemed to have the upper hand in the
fourth quarter when, with a fourth and 11 to go at the Tech 39 yard line.
Ken Sanders dropped back to punt for the Green Wave. The snap from
the center sailed far over Sanders' head, and when he retrieved it on his
own 30 yard line, he was clobbered by a host of Yellow Jacket rushers.
The ball popped into the air where it was picked off by a Tech defensive
back Rick Lewis— remember that name— who carried in for the score.

Down 7-0 with the field conditions worsening. Tulane had to throw the
wet football if it hoped to win. On the first play after the kickoff. Lewis picked
off an errant Mike Walker pass, returning it 56 yards for Tech's second
score within a 30 second period Three minutes later. Lewis picked ol( a
pass thrown by substitute quarterback Greg Gleason. and returned it to
the Tulane 23 to set up the final Yellow Jacket score.

Gleason took the Green Wave on a 67 yard scoring march after the ensuing
kickoff. but if was obviously too late to get Tulane back in the tiall game.
David Abercrombie rushed for 70 yards in the second half of the contest.
after being held out of the first half with a bruised thigh Without Abercrombie.
Tulane managed only 19 yards rushing in that first half.

-G.P.L.

/ PAGE 17

Dudley Field/october 31st

PAGE 18 / Varsity Sports

Defensive back David Hebert's

interception in tine end zone during

the final minute of play thwarted a

desperation drive by plucky

Vanderbilt and preserved a 10-7

Tulane victory. David Abercrombie

returned to the starting lineup

against the Commodores and added

101 yards to his season rushing total,

scoring the Green Wave's only

touchdown on a 21 yard sweep of

his right end early in the first quarter.

Vanderbilt got on the scoreboard

with a 55 yard drive early in the

second half that knotted the score at

7-7. Later on in the third quarter

quarterback Mike Walker hit fullback

Bob Marshall with swing passes that

gained 16 and 12 yards and got the

Green Wave close enough for Lee

Gibson to boot a 40 yard field goal

that proved to be the margin of victory.

That three point lead didn't look very

healthy late in the fourth period when

Vandy quarterback Denny Painter

(whose 79 yard touchdown pass had

given the Commodores a 26-23

victory in the final minute of play the

year before) completed four of five

passes in a drive that reached down

to the Tulane ten yardline. Hebert

stepped in front of Painter's next

toss, however, and the Vandy threat

ended right there.

-G.P.L.

raiRi

^^^flOTSw

A --.r<«5

r^^^SH i^HjHi \b9?^^ ~^

/ PAGE 19

•a

qui

(0 o

All hell broke loose in the Tulane

defensive secondary during the

Miami game as "Bullard's Bandits"

burned frustrated Hurricane

quarterbacks for a team record eight

interceptions. The Green Wave built

up a 31-0 lead before Miami

managed to score a pair of quick

PAGE 20 / Varsity Sports

touchdowns in the final two minutes

of play accounting for the 31-16

outcome. Paul Ellis and David Hebert

each made three interceptions, while

Joe Bullard and Randy Lee had one

apiece as the Hurricanes just kept

putting the football in the air. Five

different players shared in the

scoring as Hebert started it off with a

32 yard interception return for a

score Split end Mike Paulson later

grabbed a 49 yard TD pass from

Mike Walker to give Tulane a 14-0

halftime lead. Short touchdown runs

by David Abercrombie and Jim Batey

and a 32 yard field goal by Lee

Gibson capped off the Tulane

scoring in the second half. The big

win over the Hurricanes before a

happy Homecoming throng kept alive

the Green Waves slim hopes for a

Bowl bid.

-GPL.

/ PACE 21

S'lgwaaiaa'g^^ia

Tulane Stadium
/november 21st

A record breaking rushing performance by

David Abercrombie and shutout defense

combined to spark the Green Wave to a 31-0

wn over North Carolina State, prompting the

Liberty Bowl to send Executive Director Bud

Dudley down for a personal look at the team

the following week, when Tulane hosted

arch rival LSD. Abercrombie raced through

the Wolfpack for 246 yards in 33 carries to

wipe out the previous single game record of

238 yards set by Eddie Price in 1949. But a

knee injury sustained on the carry that broke

the record, left him in doubt for the LSD

clash.

Tulane's defensive front nailed Wolfpack
quarterbacks for losses 13 times during the
evening, as North Carolina wound up with
only 50 yards of total offense. Abercrombie
scored three times for the Green Wave, with
the other points coming on a one yard run
by Maxie LeBlanc, and a 39 yard field goal

by Lee Gibson.

The romps over Miami and North Carolina

State were Tulane's best efforts of the

season, as the squad parlayed opportunistic

offense and defensive play that literally

frustrated anything the opposition tried into

a pair of easy wins. More significant,

however, was Coach Pittman's declaration to

the team after the North Carolina State

game. "If we don't get after those guys

(referring to LSU) next week, I'm going to

throw in the towel."

^ ^ -G.P.L.

PAGE 22 : /; ^ VKSn V J^roiTT^i

"This is {he football game that I think we've been
waiting to tee up again, against these people, since
a year ago. It's one that we can handle. We're ready
to play a football game. We're ready to get out there
and get after their tails.

The thing that we want to do is have poise, don't
make those mistakes that get you in trouble. Let's
go out there and execute, and play our football game.
Just relax. The damn pressure is on them, right?
Let's go out there and really go after their tails .

... As i said this morning, we have won six straight
games on our field out there. We're going to make
this number seven. The people that are responsible
for this, men, are the seniors on our football team
today. They have given us the leadership to come
from an average football team to a winning football
team. I think that we owe them a great deal. This
is the last football game that they're going to play
on our home field representing Tulane University.
I'd like to have those seniors come over here and
line up right against this wall, and we will all come
over and shake hands with you."

—Coach Pittman

Tulane Stadium

/november 28th

That long awaited win over LSU eluded the Green Wave again, but the squad
showed enough in a 26-14 loss to the Tigers to merit a bid from the Liberty
Bowl immediately after the game. All four LSU touchdowns were set up by
Tulane mistakes (two fumbles, a pass interception and a bad snap from center
in a punting situation all turned the ball over to the Tigers deep in Tulane
territory) as what once would have been considered a "moral victory" proved
to be nothing but a bitter defeat. Tulane's touchdowns came on a 22 yard
pass from IVlike Walker to Steve Barrios and on a one yard run by David
Abercrombie, the first rushing touchdown by LSU had given up in 12 games.
David Abercrombie rushed for 29 yards against the Tigers to bring his season
rushing total to 993 yards, a figure surpassed only by Eddie Price in 76 years
of Tulane football history.

-G.P.L.

After observing the emotional outpouring

that had preceded the LSU game, and

having witnessed the team's reactions to

defeat on all three of the road losses, I

really didn't l<now what to expect in the

way of emotion as the team returned to

the ioclter room after the game. What I

least expected to happen, however, was

the undiplomatic way in which one of

the assistant coaches bodily threw John

James and myself out of the locker

room just prior to Coach Pittman's talk

with the squad. That all of our camera

equipment and our tape recorder lay idle

while Pittman spoke to his team hurt me

almost as much as did the loss itself.

After the speechmaking was over,

however, we were again permitted to

re-enter the locker room. I was

approached ftrst by junior tailback Maxie

LeBlanc, who oftered what I thought to

be an extremely sincere apology for

what had just happened. The next few

minutes seemed an eternity as I went

from one side of the room to the other,

very quietly conveying whatever words

my already choked voice could deliver.

The facial expressions of the players

varied, because each probably took this

loss ever so much more deeply than he

had any other, and the way that it

attacked the senses was, to me, a very

frightening, yet moving experience.

Finally I came to rest on the floor beside

my cameras and the tape recorder.

I must have stayed there for five or ten

minutes or longer, and was enveloped

with that same emotional draining that

the team was going through. I then

gathered everything together and left for

a duration of about 40 minutes. When I

returned I found Rick Kingrea still In

uniform, sitting by his locker. At this

point, I believe he was aware of the

Liberty Bowl bid, but that couldn't have

been what was on his mind. The Baton

Rouge senior and team captain for two

years running, had lost— his dream of

beating his hometown rivals had been

shattered. As a photographer, perhaps I

should have taken a picture. But, the

thought was stricken from my mind

almost immediately, ft simply wasn't the

thing to do. I had too much respect.

»-^?r^*r*- tfl^.Ji^-',

C-%'J

I»i£f{'<'

-M.A.

The Morning

After

to the Day

Before

Some people didn't find out about

it until they read the Sunday

sports section of the Picayune that

following morning. But word

generally got around during the

night that Tulane had indeed

received an invitation to play in the

Liberty Bowl. The news was

received by many as though it

were a cruel joke (the type which

only an LSU fan would dream up),

and by others as first aid relief

from the pains which a true Tulane

fan suffers after seeing another

LSU game end with Tulane on the

short end of the scoreboard.

Few fans, however, would ever
realize what a large role Lady Luck
played in securing the invitation.
First, one must realize that one of
the principal teams being
considered by the Liberty Bowl's
selection committee, the University
of Florida, had just barely lost to
the University of Miami earlier that
same day That a Gator receiver
tripped over his own feet on
Miami's five yard line, and a
desperation field goal attempt
which followed from the Miami 15
somehow went wide must not be
overlooked. Second, the Director
of the Liberty Bowl Festival
Association, Bud Dudley, after
witnessing the North Carolina
white-washing, had committed
himself to attend the LSU-Tulane
contest. Consider what Dudley
must have thought as our defense

denied the Orange Bowl bound
Tigers late in the fourth quarter
when they took over with a first
and goal situation (when any other
team would have probably
succumbed.) This "Year of the
Green " team had just stopped one
of the strongest ground-based
offenses in the country. Dudley
was so impressed— he didn't even
bother to confer with any of his
committee members.

Regardless of the 'if's and 'but's of
the situation, Tulane was finally
going to a bowl. What ensued
during the days that followed and
the frivolity of preparing for a
'nationally televised game" will
probably amuse people as much
as the game itself would. The
cheerleaders? They had to get new
uniforms Of course, they wouldn't

be ready until a few days before
the game, so all the publicity
photos were taken in the old
outfits And the Alumni? They
concerned themselves with the
planning of a mid-winter Mardi
Gras. While Bea Field's mystical
krewe worked out the official
scheduling for the upcoming
festivities, Ted Demuth and the
skeletal Tulane band were faced
with the problem of putting
together an eight-minute half-time
show, to be seen by millions of
sports fans everywhere! The
resulting talent hunt swelled the
bands' size past 70 (with many of
the new members eventually
staying with the band for the
duration of the year.)

Next came the problem of
transportation and timing Various
groups and organizations,
including the Athletic Department
Greenbackers. and the Alumni
Association sponsored charter
package plans via jet. bus. and
train.

Over at the ticket office, more than
7.000 tickets were sold (at S7.50
each), with more than 3,000 sales
coming on the first day. The
Hullabaloo determined that the
game would, or could mean as
much as S190.000 to the
University, with the greatest
portion drawn from the television
broadcast rights The Alumni
krewe further determined that their
festivities would need a few extras
to please the old grads who would
be making the pilgrimage to
Memphis How about an official
"hostess? " to act as Hospitality
Queen? Why. of course! Enter Bev
Bennett, Homecoming Queen. And
how about some singers to keep
them happy during the Friday
evening banquet and the Saturday
morning buffet. Enter the
Tulanians and Director Leiand
Bennett . .

Meanwhile, game-time
approacheth— the students began
to hear strange things about the
fabled Peabody Hotel, and about
the pet ducks that parade m and
out of the elevators and loiter
around the lobby fountain. By
Friday. December 11th. a good
portion of the University had
disappeared from campus with
close to 2,500 students and faculty
adjourning to Memphis. (Few
people, however, were able to see
the Peabody ducks. It seems as
though their metabolism got
fowled up that weekend.)

-MA.

^F^

■1

■

^^^HHSk ' ^^

r^^l

Memphis
/dec. 11th

Tulane Football fans came out of

the woodwork in droves to

descend on Memphis' proud, old,

Peabody Hotel, a 12 story

structure that served as the

Green Wave Liberty Bowl

Headquarters. Alumni, faculty,

students, and plain old gridiron

fanatics came together and gave

the Peabody a night of

merrymaking that left its veteran

staff wide-eyed in disbelief. "You

people sure know how to have

fun," an elderly elevator

remarked as another mob of

passengers debarked to join an

already packed lobby. And the

game hadn't even started yet.

-G.P.L.

PAGE 28 / Varsity Sports

/ PAGE 29

Memphis Memorial Stadium

/december 12th

"It's like I told you yesterday: These people think

that they have quite an advantage over our ball

club. They're a big, strong bunch of people and

they think they're a tremendous football team, but I

guarantee you that hitting will equalize that size in

a hurry. We've played big football teams this year

and we've come out with the hitting edge, and

we've won. So that's exactly what we've got to do

out there today, is go out and get after their ass

and play our ball game."

—Coach Pittman

Appropriately, the nationally ranked defensive unit

that was largely responsible for getting Tulane into

its first bowl game in 31 years got to start the game

when Colorado won the toss and elected to receive.

After an exchange of punts, the Buffaloes gained

possession on their own 12, and cranked up a 43

yard drive that reached into Tulane territory. With a

first and ten situation at the Tulane 45, sophomore

defensive end Randy Lee made one of the key

defensive plays of the game as he nailed Colorado

quarterback Paul Arendt for an eight yard loss

before Arendt could pitch out.

Colorado tried its first pass of the afternoon on

the next play. Rick Kingrea intercepted it for Tulane

at midfield, returning it to the Colorado six yard line

as a partisan Memphis crowd went wild. Three

thrusts at the mammoth Colorado defensive line left

Tulane two yards short of paydirt and Head Coach

Jim Pittman sent sophomore Lee Gibson into the

game to boot a 19 yard field goal.

The Green Wave's 3-0 lead was short-lived as

Colorado drove 68 yards with the ensuing kickoff to

set up a 22 yard field goal that sent the two teams

into the locker room at halftime in a 3-3 deadlock.

PAGE 30 / Varsity Sports

tKilf^}^JWA

"W<

SEC 8

lii

'Ifii —

JS^.

SEC It

f^^

.■"^i

,'C-i ^l~

^ i

'■^'^

■^'?Stf,

"7*

r^^'

»=^ t- is'^ijj^i" 1

PAGE 32 / Vaksity Sposts

Backed by a beefed-up version of Tulane's student band. Frankie
Assunto and the Dukes of Dixieland warmed up Tulanes portion
of the halftime show with an impromptu Dixieland jazz concert. Actor
Ed Nelson, a Tulane alumnus, narrated the proceedings as the
Green Waves all volunteer band whooped it up in the background.

The Liberty Bowl Association's portion of the halftime ceremonies
featured the usual patriotic motif, with Pat O'Brien reciting Wash-
ington's Prayer for Our Country while the West Point Glee Club
performed in the background. The Liberty Bowl halftime show
always ends with a rendition of God Bless America and the waving
of thousands of minature American flags by the fans in attendance,
a spectacle that came over with amazing sincerity in spite of the
fact that public display of such sentiment is not as fashionable
as it used to be.

/ PAGE 33

David Abercrombie gathered in the second half
kickoff for Tulane at his own four, headed for the
left sideline, found daylight, and 65 yards later the
Green Wave had the heavily favored Buffaloes on
the run. Tulane decided to challenge the hefty
Colorado defense on the ground and the strategy
worked. Fullback Bob Marshall roared through the
right side of his offensive line for successive runs
of 16 and 13 yards, setting up a first and goal
situation at the two yard line for the Wave. A fine
block by Marshall cleared the path for Abercrombie
on the next play as Tulane's tailback bulled over
right guard, putting the Green Wave ahead to stay.

PAGE 34 / Varsity Sports

ikt

The rest of the third quarter turned into a tight
defensive struggle with each team managing only
one first down. However, Tulane changed all that
on its first possession of the fourth period. Aided
by a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty on the Co-
lorado bench. Tulane took over the Buffalo 42 yard
line and marched to paydirt as Marshall and Aber-
crombie carried the football on all eleven plays of
the drive. In its two remaining possessions, Co-
lorado's offense failed to get past the Tulane 47
yard line, and the clock ticked a 17-3 Tulane win
into history.

-GPL.

/ PAGE 35

"Men, I've got to say thank you for the greatest thing that's ever happened to me.

I appreciate and love every one of you, and you've given us a great season. You've

done an outstanding job for us and I love every one of you. Bless your hearts. . . .

let's have a good time tonight!"

—Coach PIttman

"I can't keep this ball. This is for Tulane University. We beat the hell out of
Colorado. Not one man did it, not two men, not three men. The whole 55 that
dressed out, and everybody that worked all year for this. When we came up here, we
were nothing. . . . And we showed'em we were something when we finished."

—Rick Kingrea

PAGE 36 / Varsity Spokts

It was a long, slow journey back, but
Tulane football finally arrived in 1970.
The winning season, the bowl bid.
and the victory over Colorado before
a national television audience, came
at a time when Tulane football sorely
needed two things: money and
friends.

The payoff for Tuiane's participation
in the Liberty Bowl reached well into
six figures and the teams impressive
performance convinced the ABC
network to include the Green Wave's
1971 clash with Georgia Tech on
their regular season schedule. The
result: another sizable extra payday,
and a more solvent athletic
department.

Direct financial considerations aside,
a successful football program is a
rallying point for alumni, alumni with
the resources to considerably aid the
University's financial plight. Not many
old grads are going to get excited
about an academician's latest
publication and few understand or
sympathize with the aims of a
student movement. But a winning
football team can revive the spirit
and loosen the purse strings.
The Memphis joy ride could come to
a screeching halt, however, if the
football success does not continue.
The important need to maintain
momentum caused a good deal of
concern when Head Coach Jim
Pittman rendered his resignation two
days after the Liberty Bowl and
departed for a new job (and raise) at
Texas Christian University.
After a week and a half search,
Arkansas State Head Coach Bennie
Ellender, a Tulane Alumnus and
NCAA small college Coach of the
Year in 1970, agreed to take up the
post. The squad responded well to
Ellender and his new staff in their
spring workouts, and it is obvious
that the soft spoken newcomber has
inherited a much healthier situation
than his predecessor fell heir to in
his first season. The 18,000 fans who
turned out for the fvlay 1 spring game
would indicate that things will indeed
be much greener in the immediate
future.

-GPL.

/ P.4GE 3'

PAGE 38 / Vaksity Sports

Basketball

/ PAGE 39

GEORGE FERGUSON
HAROLD SYLVESTER
JIM KWIATOWSKI
MIKE BILLINGSLEY
RICK MILLER
JOHN SZPONAR
MIKE DRESSLER
MIKE HENRY
JOHN SUTTER
DAN IMMING
ED HARRIS
DAVE ALSPAUGH
STUART KURTY
WAYNE GARRET

"The Year of the Green" turned pale for the
1970-71 edition of the Tulane basketball team as
the roundballers bounced their way to a
deflating 8-18 season record.

Starting off with a spurt. Tulane rode the
scoring and rebounding of John Sutter and
Harold Sylvester, and picked up four wins in
their first six contests. Green Wave optimism
was short-lived however, as the team dropped
nine decisions in a row to watch their record
plummet to 4-11. Doing most damage during this
time was a disastrous road trip over the
holidays.

Coach Ralph Pedersons charges came out of
their lackadaisical shells only twice the entire
season. Playing before the home crowd on both
occasions, the Wave took the measure of LSU

and Florida State

Against the Bengals. Harold Sylvester had the
best night of his disappointing career at Tulane.
Harold popped in 33 points and pulled down 15
rebounds to spark the Wave's 93-86 demolishing
of the Tigers.

Highly-regarded independent Florida State was
also unfortunate to catch the Greenies on a hot
night. Inspired by the stunned home crowd.
George Ferguson. Mike Henry, and company
opened up an early 20 point lead and coasted to
an easy 88-69 victory.

Other than these two efforts, the team showed
little class in dropping 18 games The Greenies
seemed to lack conditioning, drilling, and
everything else that makes a top-notch
basketball squad.

/ PAGE 41

PAGE 42 / Varsity Sports

Under fire at midseason, Coach Pederson

made the decision to retire from coaching at the

end of the season. The decision seemed a good

one as Coach Pederson's heart condition and

temperament seemed to preclude Tulane from

ever reaching basketball excellence under his

tutelage.

For his replacement, the Athletic Advisory

Board stayed at home and picked Dick Longo,

the freshman coach. Coach Longo's credentials

merited the shot at the top job. In the past two

campaigns, Longo's charges have posted a 37-4

record, including a 19-2 worksheet for the past

season. Record-wise, the frosh team was ranked

among the best in the nation.

Coach Longo will be bringing a combination

of youth, imagination, and experience to the job

next year. In coaching for the past 12 years, the

trademark of Longo's teams have been

conditioning and hustle, accented by verve on

the court. An innovator, Coach Longo has the

talent for molding winning teams out of

disparate spirits.

Looking at the upcoming season optimistically.

Coach Longo is convinced that he can not only

bring Tulane a winner in basketball, but he fully

expects to field a post season tournament team

in the near future. The future looks Green for

the basketball team.

—Tony LaNasa
A&S '71

/ PAGE 43

SEATED:

GUY WEINBERG

PEGE STERNBERGER

ERIC KIESEL

standing:

MIKE BALLOTTI

AZILE MANSEN

BRUCE DANNER

GREG SCHRAMEL

COACH PAUL PRINCE

BETSY ADAMS

STEVE DANNER

RINGERS:

BEV ANDERSON

GAIL PERRY

PEGGY ROBERTS

Since the arrival of Coacli Paul Prince in September of

1969, gymnastics has slowly been rising in popularity on the

Tulane campus. Today there are not only men's and

women's gymnastics classes in the P.E. department, but

there is also the addition of a neophyte gymnastics team,

which has started to compete on the inter-collegiate level.

The only factor which keep the team members going is

the individual appreciation each member has for the sport

and the encouragement of Coach Prince. Since the

allocation of funds from the University Is minimal, additional

money which Is needed to cover the team's expenses is

earned by team members themselves through teaching and

other money making projects. Should the Athletic

department budget include adequate funds for the support

of the team's development in the next season, the outlook

for the success of the sport in the future would be much

brighter; the key is In finding those adequate funds.

—Bruce Danner
A&S '72

PAGE 44 / Varsity Sports

/ PACE 45

EVENT

TIME

TULANE RECORD HOLDER

YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.
YDS.

FREE STYLE
FREE STYLE
FREE STYLE
FREE STYLE
FREE STYLE
BREAST STROKE
BREAST STROKE
BACK STROKE
BACK STROKE
BUTTERFLY
BUTTERFLY
INDIVIDUAL MEDLEY
MEDLEY RELAY
FREE STYLE RELAY

'21 4'

^ LARRY CURRAN '

100

'48.3'

' LARRY CURRAN "

200

■■1^

' SAM MILNE '

500

muam

' SAM MILNE

1000

' DON BARNES

100

1039'

' SAM MINE

200

flUBiC

^JOHN ROUQUETTE '

100

• •

' BILLY WEIDNER '

200

' BILLY WEIDNER '

100

'535 '

' CHUCK O'BRIEN *

200

' CHUCK O'BRIEN '

200

' CHUCK O'BRIEN

400

•3:42.5'

^BILirWEIMER ■• CHliCll O'BWEII -.'

400

'3168'

- scon KiuFraui ■ ■ cuis petekm ■ ,

STEVE JOHNSGK ' StM MIINE

PAGE 46 / Varsity Sports

Swimming

With heavy attention focused on such sports
as football, basketball, and baseball at Tulane.
It's not surprising that a sport like swimming
rarely gets noticed by people other than its own
participants and a few close followers. It
doesn't make money. No professional swim
teams exist for swimmers to join after gradua-
tion. Yet. when a team rises from the depths
of mediocrity to a position of power among its
peers, and does so with relatively little support
from the school, there must be some solid
reason for it.

In this case, the "reason" is Coach C. Ri-
chard Bower. Since taking the position as swim
coach two years ago. Dick Bower has cata-
pulted his team from a 6-6 record to successive
season marks of 10-5. and this year 17-3, yield-
ing only to powerhouses Alabama and Florida
State, and a one point loss to South Florida.

The record board has been changed 32 times
this year and only one record out of 1 7 remains.
Of the 16 new records, half are owned or
shared by swimmers not on athletic aid of any
type. That these swimmers have achieved this
level is attributable only to Bower's ability as
a coach. The team respects him not only be-
cause of his even rule and discipline, but also
because of his ability and knowledge of the
sport. In twenty years of coaching, he has met
with people in all aspects of the sport, stayed
abreast of current techniques and innovations,
and has experimented extensively with his own
theories.

Under Bower's training, two Tulane swim-
mers. Scott Kaufman and Sam Milne, qualified
for the NCAA championships this year. Several
others iust missed the cutoff times. The team

/ P.\GE 47

Itself finished second behind Florida State in
the Independent Southern Intercollegiate
Championships this year.

Two years ago, Tulane's team consisted of
two returning varsity swimmers and a handful
of good and average high school swimmers.
Building it to Its present level of strength was
a remarkable job, but if Tulane is to enjoy
national prominence In swimming, we will have
to start recruiting high school swimmers of high
ability. Doing this will not be possible without
additional aid In the form of scholarships.

We have the coach and the making of a great
team, but we'll need the better high schoolers
to build this team into a national power, which
can be done with additional aid. Tulane has
the potential for gaining fame as a swimming
power— to Ignore It would be senseless.

—Dana Abbott
A&S 72

SITTING;

SAM MILNE

CHUCK O'BRIEN

BILLY WEIDNER

DANA ABBOTT

CHAMP HOLLAND

DONNY BARNES

ON THE BOARD:
SCOTT KAUFFMAN

STANDING:

COACH DICK BOWER

HUDSON SMITH

DON SPECK

MIKE MCKEEVER

CRAIG PETERSON

JOHN WILSON

ANDY SMITH

BILL SLOAN

WILEY PATTERSON

JIM HARVEY

ON THE TRAMP:
BOBBY LANGDON
ROBERT FLEMING

PAGE 48 / Varsity Sports

i^fl^ir^:

PAGE 50 / A^ARSITY- SpOKTS

Track

The 1971 track season has to be considered m some respects
a great success, yet in others a failure Three individual
school records— one mile. 4:04,4. Bill Brown; three mile.
14:27. Taylor Aultman: and shot put. 54'1". Steve Meyer-
were set, as well as records in the distance medley and (our mile relays Tulane
scored its first-ever victories at both Florida and Texas Relays, with the (our mile
relay team of Fred Basha, Jud Tomlin. Bob Sahuque. and Bill Brown winning at Flori-
da, and Brown capturing the open mile at Texas.

Now the disappointments: early in the season Coach Oelkers had dreams of a great
distance medley relay. Then, at the Astrodome in February. Mark Stonecipher severely

/ PAGE 51

pulled a hamstring, and was lost for
theseason. WithoutStonecipher, the
first three legs of Sahuque, Mark
Welch, and Brown led, but then lost
on the anchor leg as Villanova won
in world record time. The distance
medley never again materialized with
this kind of performance, and proved
to be a great source of disappoint-
ment for Coach Oelkers as the sea-
son progressed. Then later, during
the outdoor season, Harry Moon,
long and triple jumper, finally getting
back in shape after being the victim
of injuries for two years, once again
suffered a serious injury, a hyper-ex-
tension behind the right knee, cur-
tailing his season. At the time of this
writing, there are several meets left,
and everyone is hoping to improve
their performances. Brown has al-
ready qualified for the NCAA na-
tionals in Seattle in June.

On the basis of team results, the
Greenies once again were weak. I
feel that this warrants some expla-
nation. Tulane, being very limited in
funds, has never furnished enough
money to recruit and sign a real track
team. Therefore, Tulane's team con-
sists of a few athletes, usually fairly
proficient in their events, but unable
to pick up enough points to score

• .j&W.a'' »^^

well in a team meet. Tulane's team
is, for instance, about one quarter
the size of LSU's. What might be
done aboutthis, I don't know; maybe
things will remain as they are, maybe
they will improve, or maybe track will
eventually be phased out.

Coach Oelkers said that he felt the
season as a whole was fairly suc-
cessful, despite the number of ill-
nesses and injuries which slowed
people down (Stonecipher, Moon,
Kevin Hammar to injuries, B. J. Lyon
and Welch to sickness). He added
that he expected improvements in
performances during the remainder
of the spring season, and that he was
enthusiastic about next year, with
almost the entire team returning.

Mark Welch added, "I think we
need more girls out to watch track
practice."

— Bill Brown
A&S '72

an:^3t

> si«<»fe&!ScJi>aoS3a:*— "Cufci*

SITTING:

BOBBY SAHUQUE

B. J. LYON

HARRY MOON

STEVE BROOKSHER

BILL BROWN

TAYLOR AULTMAN

FRED BASHA

IRWIN MANDELKERN

STANDING:

MARK WELCH

COACH JOHN OELKERS

FRANK MURPHY

STEVE MEYER

MARK HOLT

KEVIN HAMMAR

JUDSON TOMLIN

GARY WEISS

lapped:

MARK MARLEY

MARK STONECIPHER

PAGE 52 / Varsity Sports

/ PACE 53

Tennis

Coach Emmett Fare's netters

bounced back from their first

losing season in ten years to post

a 7-5-1 mark in 1971. The talent

drought that has befallen the dean

of American college tennis

coaches in recent years was

complicated by the loss of top

singles player John Williams due

to a pre-season leg injury.

Sophomore Andy Shields came on

to post an 8-6 record in the

number one singles spot vacated

by Williams.

The brightest spot for the 1971

squad was the play of mammoth

Sean Terry, a six foot-ten inch

freshman with a basketball

grant-in-aid, who came on to

record a 5-0 singles record and

teamed with Alex Coxe for a 9-1

mark in doubles play. After a late

start due to basketball competition,

Terry moved up to the number

three singles spot in winning five

consecutive matches. The ability

wore thin after these two as Pare,

who now has an unbelievable

268-52-18 college coaching

record, had to settle for another

average season.

— Gayle Letulle
Law 72

PAGE 54 / Varsity Sports

W&^^^M

SEATED

ANDY SHIELDS

SEAN TERRY

LINDA TUERO

ALEX COXE

STEVE SCHULTZ

STANDING:

MIKE ZYGMUNT

LEON MARKS

JOE GETTYS

COACH EMMETT PARE

ROBIN SANDAGE

MARK HARNER

/ PAGE 51)

PAGE 56 / Varsity Sports

Despite the mediocre seasons which
the tennis team has gone through in
the last tew years, national
recognition has once again come to
Tulane via the tennis court. Linda
Tuero. the first female to receive an
athletic scholarship at Tulane. has
won three major national titles in the
last two years. She won the U.S.
Women's Amateur Championship
twice, in 1969 and 1970, and then
added the US Clay Court Open for
Women to her list of achievements
last August. Although she is the
number two ranked person in the
National Women's Amateur ratings at
present, she holds only the number
eleven spot in the Women's Open
Division (this includes professionals).
She does have a better record
however, than some of the women
ranked ahead of her.

Linda's situation is an increasingly
difficult one in that she is one of the
few girls playing competitively, while
still a student. Most of the other
women have either never gone to
college, or have quit in order to
devote full time to perfecting their
game. This has been a handicap to
Linda's national rankings because
she must divide her time between
studies and tennis. She loves tennis,
but to her, it is a matter of priorities,
and right now, she feels there are
more important things to accomplish.

Linda is a unique member of the
Tulane Tennis Squad in that she is
the only girl on it. This had
unfortunately, affected her chances
of playing frequent intercollegiate
matches. Some schools refuse to
match their boys against her, while
others, like those within the S.E.C. or
the Big Ten, are prohibited from
playing girls by their conference
rules. Because of this, Linda's record
as a member of the Tulane team was
three wins against no defeats this
year, and eight wins and one defeat
in three years.

Being the only girl on the squad
could present some very frustrating
difficulties. The only people she can
practice against are boys. Linda
readily admits that boys are much
better than girls because they are
bigger, stronger, and faster. Shots
which would have been sure scores
against a girl, are easily returned to
her by the boys. She must constantly
remind herself that had she been
playing girls, she would be faring
much better.

Outside of these difficulties. Linda
has had a tremendous effect on the
whole squad Both players and
coach agree that she is an
inspiration to all. Coach Pare says of
her, "She gives up size, strength,
and speed to nearly everyone she
plays, yet she seldom loses She has
a wonderful attitude, and wins
through her concentration and her
will to fight. I know there are times

when this attitude rubs off on the
rest of the squad '

As for her teammates, they do not
mind playing against her at all. To
them, she is just one of the guys
And most would rather practice
against her than anyone else on the
team. She is steady, and returns
most shots during workouts. Besides,
playing her can often be amusing:
she s easy to drop shot.

-Tony Fontana
A&S 72

/ PAGE 57

PAGE 58 / Varsity Sports

•i:*.

' '^^/>l^3t Tulane remains
^^^/l I little more than an
exercise in futility, quite the same
condition that has prevailed for
several years . . . The outlook is
bleak." So read the description of
the golf team in the 1969 Jamb.
But since that time the Green
Wave golfers have changed
coaches, courses, and their losing
attitude.

With the hiring of Jim Hart, pro at
Lakewood Country Club, golf at
Tulane has seen a remarkable
resurgence. With four freshmen,
tw/o sophomores, and one senior,
the Green Wave recorded its first
winning season, 14-8, in several
years. After a loss to U.S.L. in the
early spring, Tulane golfers won
nine of ten dual meets. The major
highlight of the year was a tri-meet
victory over Loyola and L.S.U.N.O.
Although tournament golf was not
as strong as it could have been,
the record was extraordinary for a
golf team that had won four
matches in the past three years.

Contrary to the words of the 1969
Jamb, the outlook has never been
brighter.

-Ken Weil
A&S 74

• • fJ^ ..♦♦•• ♦♦♦♦ • ♦

'* * f •rz, . \ •* • ^ • • ' *

♦♦•♦••♦♦
♦♦♦•♦♦

back:

ALAN SPROWLS
MAURY PICHELOUP
SCOTT NICHOLAS
TED BISKIND
COACH JIM HART

trapped:
KEN WEIL

Baseball

Running into a rainless season for
the first time in years, the 1971
edition of the Tulane baseball
team started and finished strong in
posting a 16-10 season record.
Coach Milt Retif fielded a young
team this year, one that was long
on experience, but short on depth.
The only seniors in the starting
lineup were catcher Butch Raley,
second baseman Ned Reese, and
third baseman Marty Donovan.
On the mound, the Wave ran into
deep trouble. Despite having a fine
front line of Bobby Thomas, Chris
Winter, and Ed Bernard, the loss
of Steve Walton for the entire
season left the Wave in a bind for
relief pitching. Realistically, the
dearth in the bullpen probably cost
Tulane four or five victories this
year.

For the past two years. Coach
Retif had been criticized for not
scheduling more games, and thus
losing out on the chance to
compete in the regional playoffs
because other teams had more
victories. This year, the 26-game
slate was a godsend. With only
freshman John Ryan and outfielder
Don Hartman available for pitching

PAGE 60 / Varsity Sports

FRONT:

JOHN MUELLER

DOUG ROBERT

WARD PURDUM

GARY LIVINGSTON

STAN TREITLER

BRUCE BURGA

CHUCK DUNBAR

GARY RAY

middle:

CURT ZIMMERMAN

STEVE WALTON

BOB THOMAS

DON HARTMAN

TOM GARDNER

JOHN RYAN
CARLOS CESPEDES

BACK

COACH MILT RETIF

MARTY DONOVAN

MIKE ROVAN

GARY STRELAU

EDDIE BARNARD

GEORGE KUBACH

GARY BERNARD

BUTCH RALEY

CHRIS WINTER

BOB WHITMAN

COACH ANDREW GANGOLF

NED REESE

/ PAGE 61

PAGE 62 / Varsity Sports

duty, the Wave would have been
in dire straits with a 40-game slate.
Defensively, the Greenies played
adequate to good ball all season.
One of the bright spots here was
the double play combination of
Ned Reese and Gary Bernard.
Against the Miami Hurricanes, the
pair teamed up to initiate three
double plays in one game Overall.
however, the Wave had poor team
speed, and this showed up several
times in the outfield on deep fly
balls.

Except for the day when they
shelled Loyola for 20 hits and 16
runs, the Wave bats were quiet
most of the season. A good
example of the ineffectiveness of
the Tulane hitters was pitcher
Bobby Thomas. He finished the
year with a 5-4 record, and had to
pitch four shutouts to do it. Three
of Thomas' losses came when the
Greenies failed to score a run
against the opposition.

One bright exception to this
blight at the plate was the hitting
of centerfielder Gary Livingston,
who led the Wave with a .380
batting average, and pummelled
the opposing pitcher unmercifully
during the second half of the
season. In the Loyola series.
Livingston had nine hits in 12 at

bats with two home runs and six
runs batted in. The only other
Greenine stickman to hit over 300
was right fielder Don Hartman.
who hit .310

Next year could be a tossup for
the Wave as ace pitchers Thomas
and Winter both graduate The
pitching load would then fall upon
the shoulders of John Ryan, Ed
Bernard, and whoever Coach Retif
can sign this summer. In the
infield. Curt Zimmerman and Gary
Bernard will be back to anchor the
diamond, with Gary Livingston and
his bat leading the outfield.

In order to get Tulane back in
shape to compete for national
honors. Coach Retif will have to
do some shoring up for the next
season In addition to the need for
more depth on the pitching
mound. Retif will have to find
some way to get more speed in
the outfield and power at the
plate. Finally, if he can find a
suitable replacement for the
departing Butch Raley at catcher.
1972 might be a good season for
the baseballers.

—Tony LaNasa
A&S 71

TEAMS M

™i^

■^ .'-^

BALL STMICE QUIT

Baseball

,V..-i

football

T.U. OPPONENT

14 TEXAS TECH

17 GEORGIA

23 ILLINOIS

6 CINCINNATI

3 AIR FORCE

24 N. CAROLINA

6 GEORGIA TECH

10 VANDERBILT

31 MIAMI, FLA.

N.C. STATE

L.S.U.

17 COLORADO

basketball

T.U. OPPONENT

77 NORTHWESTERN LA.
75 CITADEL
100 SOUTH DAKOTA
60 HOUSTON
89 TEXAS A & M
109 INDIANA STATE
79 L.S.U.
77 WISCONSIN
PURDUE
OLD DOMINION
66 XAVIER, OHIO
I N. CAROLINA
I TEXAS

GEORGIA TECH
RICE

FLORIDA STATE
71 MIAMI (FLA.)
66 MIAMI (OHIO)
65 VALPARAISO
93 L.S.U.
81 UTAH STATE
85 VIRGINIA TECH
37 STETSON
93 TAMPA
^6 MARQUETTE
74 GEORGIA TECH

swimming

T.U. OPPONENT

51 L.S.U.

52 RICE 42
59 KENT STATE 54
66 UNIV. of EVANSVILLE 45
66 UNIV. OF MISSOURI (AT ROLLA) 47
36 ALABAMA 77
56 SOUTH FLORIDA 57

65 MIAMI (FLORIDA) 48
63 AUBURN 44
55 UNIV. OF THE SOUTH 51
62 'KENYON COLLEGE 33

50 *SANTA BARBARA 45

51 *MIAMI (FLORIDA) 44

83 'FREDONIA (N.Y.) 12
79 'BLOOMSBURG (PA.) 16
73 L.S.U. 4e^
60 *E. CAROLINA UNIV. (N. Car.) 53

66 VANDERBILT 47
53 FLORIDA STATE 60

84 GEORGIA TECH 26
2nd INDEPENDENT SOUTHERN

INTERCOLLEGIATE CHAMPIONSHIPS

'TELEGRAPHIC MEET

tennis

T.U. OPPONENT

FURMAN
' RICE

HOUSTON
I TEXAS

I SOUTH ALABAMA
WILLIAM & MARY
MICHIGAN STATE
MISSISSIPPI STATE
N.O. LAWN TENNIS
MISSISSIPPI STATE
I GEORGIA TECH
1 FLORIDA STATE

L.S.U.
7 ALABAMA

baseball

T.U.

OPPONENT

304

L.S.U.N.O.

290

311

SOUTHERN MISS.

290

311

MCNEESE

331

309

SOUTHERN MISS.

319

308

NICHOLLS STATE

321

LOYOLA

3rd

NICHOLLS QUADRANGULAR

307

SOUTHEASTERN

324

309

SOUTHEASTERN

305

309

LOYOLA

313

327

L.S.U.N.O.

307

330

SOUTHWESTERN

298

13th

SENIOR BOWL TOURNEY

412

SOUTHWESTERN

381

396

MCNEESE

398

16'/.

LOYOLA

lOVk

4th

TULANE INVITATIONAL

401

L.S.U.N.O. 382 S. ALA.

407

401

421

5th

RICE INVITATIONAL

8th

SOUTHERN MISS. TOURNEY

301

LOYOLA 303 S. ILLINOIS

308

392

SOUTH ALABAMA

397

381

LOYOLA 383 L.S.U.N.O.

389

5th

lA INTERCOLLEGIATE

T.U. OPPONENT

SPRING HILL
SPRING HILL
MURRAY STATE
COAST GUARD ACADEMY
COAST GUARD ACADEMY
COAST GUARD ACADEMY
SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI
SOUTH ALABAMA
L.S.U.N.O.
L.S.U.N.O.
1 L.S.U.

NORTHERN ILLINOIS

BAYLOR

XAVIER

MIAMI. FLA.

MIAMI, FLA.

LOYOLA

L.S.U.

CENTENARY

^m £GlU/f, ■* 0M6 j

D^T F6CZ) ^/v/tt (Ja;
THE ^HiiLS.

•gO^■'^:

Sailing

One of the few actively independent group;
on campus is the Sailing Club, It's prograi
is mainly centered on teaching interested
students how to sail; the teachers are fello!
students, and all plans of the club are mai
by students under the direction of advisor
Bob Mason.

The training program has been quite
effective this year. Novice sailors were
organized into five groups with two skippei
permanently at the head of each group.
Wednesday night classroom instruction
sessions were held along with weekend
sails on the lake in Tulane boats. At the
end of each semester the skippers
organized a novice regatta, giving their
students a chance to sail competitively ant
test their training.

Perhaps the best-known aspect of the
Sailing Club is its Racing Team., Composet
of the skippers who have become proficier
enough at sailing and racing rules to quail-
for competition, Tulane's team has been
acknowledged as the best in the South am''
one of the best in the nation. The team ha
captured the Douglas Cup and the Kennec
Cup in 1970 and again this year, a feat
which never before had been done by any
school. In our own Sugar Bowl regatta, the
Tulane team placed second only to San
Diego State College, whose sailors
specialize in dinghy sailing. Tulane will
again send a team to the North American
Dinghy Championships to be held in
Annapolis, and also to the Women's
Nationals at the Coast Guard Academy.
Both contests are for national
championships.

—Sylvia Youj
Newcomb '

PAGE 66 / Club Spokts

1 GREG BERTUCCI
2 /JOE JACKSON
3 SYLVIA YOUNG
4/TOM PLANCHARO
5'BILLY BUDO
6/BILL TARNEY
7 /DAN NASH
8/ LOUIS SWANN
9/CAPT AHAB
10/CLIFF GRIM

11/POPEYE
12'CAPT HOOK
13/MIKE RELIHAN
14 OLIVE OIL
15/MARGO BRETZ

16 VAN BOYETT

17 MARCIA GUMPERTZ

18 JOHN ORR

19 PAT BOYLSTON

20 CLAY DORRIS

21 JOE DAVENPORT

22 ROB ROBINSON

23 WARREN TRASK

24 BOB RUDERMAN

/ PAGE 67

^ .ri^r'

*,^

At Newport. Rhode Island, the rallying cry ol the 1970 America's Cup
was "Ficker is Quicker." It was inevitable that intercollegiate sailors
modified that to "Dane's a Pain " Alter all. lots ol people have lathers
.vho sail; lots ol people have lived near a lake all ol their lives: lots
jf people have associated with some ol the top sailors in the country
and learned Irom them, but it seems that only John Dane. Ill has used
all ol these ellectively enough to t>e called "America's brightest hope
for the 1972 Olympic gold medal in sailing " by everyone (rem Sports
Illustrated to the Washington Post to our own Hullabaloo

Sailors have been putting up with the civil engineering junior Irom Tulane
since he won the 1967 Sears Cup. representative of the North American
lunior sailing championship He first created waves in intercollegiate
circles by earning regatta low point skipper in the 1969 Nonh American
Dinghy Championship when just a freshman Since then. Dane and his
crews from Tulane have handed bitter defeats to the top collegiate sailors
and dominated intercollegiate large boat competition by winning the
Douglas and Kennedy Cups for the past two years.

The Douglas Cup. collegiate counterpart of the America's Cup and the
intercollegiate match-racing championship, is sailed in Columbia 26's
in Long Beach. California The record of the Tulane team in attaining
these two championships is 14 wins and no losses.

The Kennedy Cup is sailed at Annapolis. Maryland, in 44 foot yawls.
and IS the symbol ol the intercollegiate big boat championship The
two victories in this event are won over 20 ol the linest intercollegiate
sailing teams in the country.

But Dane is a pain as lar as the rest ol the sailing world is concerned.
too For starters, he won the 1969 North American Soling Championship.
the Canadian Soling Championship, and the 1970 British Soling National
Championship He finished as runner-up in the 1970 World Soling Class
Championship having defeated that legendary Dane. Paul Elvstrom But
Elvstrom got his revenge when he forced our Dane to take second place
in the Olympic preview. Kiel Week Soling competition m Germany It
must be pointed out. however, that most people simply consider Elvstrom
as the best sailor in the world today

John does relax periodically, though Consider the summer of 1 969 when
he "won the World Windmill class competition As much as anything.
he did It for a friend who wanted to sell the championship boat Or
there is the month he spent in Australia, all expenses paid, crewing
for a friend in the Flying Dutchman World Championships

It's fairly clear that John deserves his two year title of collegiate sailing
All American and that Tulane can be justly proud of "Our Great Dane."

-Kathy Kein
Newcomb "72

/ p.*cE 69

Scuba

The Tulane Scuba Club was formed at the beginning

of the spring semester in 1970. The nature of the

sport in this area made diving either inaccessible or

prohibitively expensive except when attempted in

fairly large groups. It was felt that formal organization

would facilitate communication among the divers on

campus. The club made several dives in the gulf off

the coast of Louisiana that year, but because of the

late start and the early end of the semester, there

was little time to establish the necessary foundations

for an efficient organization.

This year, the club has expanded substantially.

Although the membership is not large as yet, the

present members are active and enthusiastic about

the club and the sport. A number of diving

expeditions took members to the Florida Coast at

Destin, Pensacola, Tampa, and the Florida Keys, as

well as to Florida's inland springs and rivers. In

addition, the club has made one dive in the

Carribbean off the coast of British Honduras and has

another such trip planned for the end of this year.

Aside from the recreational aspects of the club,

however, it has a much more serious and vital

function. Through the use of films and research on

new techniques and equipment, the club helps keep

its members informed about the latest advances in

diving, making it safe to enjoy the sport. In addition

to helping one another, the club members are active

in assisting with scuba classes held at Tulane. This

activity, besides aiding the novice divers, and keeping

the club members in touch with the very latest and

most professional information, serves as a

promotional effort since these classes are the club's

main source of membership. About thirty to forty

percent of the students in the classes will become

active club members, and by the end of the year,

they will probably boost active membership to around

fifty students.

1 /JAMES MONEAL

2/CATHY TRUSCOTT

3/FRED BELL

4/CARL LEEDY

5/DOUG JOHNSON

6/JAMES MOERS

7/MIKE RACHELSON

8/PHYLLIS NUGENT

9/JAMES HARVEY

10/MIKE KNAPP

11 /ROGER FIELDS

12/JEFF FLATER

13/LISA GOLDBERG

14/ERIC HITCHCOCK

15/NIK BEDNARSKI

PAGE 70 / Club Sports

-Jim Harvey
A&S '72

1/TONI KNORR

2 NANCY PATTERSON

3 VICKY SHERROUSE
4,PEGI BALLENGER
5/JILL DUNCAN

6 PRISSY STEWART

7 JILL STUART

8 MURIAL PLAMGREN

9 JANE FAULKNER

10 MUFFIN MAYER

11 KAY HAAS

12 VICKI REIKES

The Barracuda Club originated in 1945
primarily as a class in water ballet,
emphasizing water skills such as
synchronized stroking and floating.
Recently, the group has been reorganized
as a club. Competitive tryouts have
produced greater team strength and
enthusiasm for the art form as a means of
creative expression. As such, the emphasis
has moved from a "sport" club to a
competitive team. By participating in the
Southern Aquatic Art Symposium in
Greenville. South Carolina, in November,
the Barracudas worked with teams from
other universities and were introduced to
new ideas In synchronized swimming.
This was a year of experimenting with
various approaches to creative expression
in the water. After thoroughly researching
the history of voodoo in New Orleans, a
seven-member team performed during the
Easter break in the International Festival of
Aquatic Art in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Their
number "Voodoo Rites on the Bayou" was
enthusiastically received by critics and
audience alike.

This year, funds were utilized to improve
the program by purchasing necessary
training equipment and costumes. The
1971-72 program Includes several team
competition trips and a spring show. The
Barracuda Club Is especially interested in
incorporating strong male swimmers for
mixed duets and team numbers. This Idea
will provide new challenges for the club.

—Jill Duncan
Newcomb '73

Barracuda

/ PAGE 71

J. Wayne Anderson
David A. Marcello
James A. Hayes

National
Moot Court

The National IVloot Court is an annual competition in whicli tine participating
teams, representing more than 100 law schools from throughout the nation,
argue a moot point of law before a panel of judges. The case is presented
as an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The question for
1970-71 involved a defamation of character suit in which a journalist claimed
a right to withhold the names of his confidential sources of information.

The competition is staged in two phases, the first being a series of regional
competitions throughout the nation. This year the School of Law hosted the
regional competition for Region VII— a region comprised of several Southern
states. The moot court team representing Tulane advanced from the regionals
into the final rounds of competition in New York. The team advanced to the
semifinal round, after having been paired against Nebraska, Stanford, and
Northwestern University. Tulane was defeated in the semi-final round by Ohio
State, the ultimate winner of the competition.

J. Wayne Anderson
Law '71

PAGE 72 / Club Sports

In 1848. with a donation of S500 to establish an award (or outstanding elocutron on campus,
the Glendy Burke Society was founded The donor was a local businessman, a contemporary
o( Paul Tulane. The Glendy Burke Debate Society is the oldest debate in the South and \he
third oldest in the nation. It has a long tradition and claims many famous alumni

Glendy Burke began this year in a rebuilding program, but by the time mid-season came along.
Tulane had already established itself by a strong winning trend The argumentation centered
around the topic of Federal wage-and-price controls, with intercollegiate competition done at
the tournament level.

The tournaments attended this year included Middle Tennessee State. LSU. Emory. Samtord
University. Louisiana Tech. and the Citadel. Significant among the awards received this year
are quarter-finals at the Citadel (losing to nationally ranked West Georgia), third at Samford
(defeating Ohio State, but then losing again to that same West Georgia team): and first at Louisiana
Tech. Analysis and organization are stressed in the speaking, with tournament competition provid-
ing the forum to perfect these skills

Besides travel and competition. Glendy Burke also sponsors the Mardi Gras National Invitational
Debate Tournament, with more than 50 teams from all over the country participating in the four-day
session. This year's winner was Oklahoma City University, with Loyola of Chicago finishing second.

With the teams of Hickok & Pinnolis, and Shea & Buras returning, Glendy hopes to expand
its success by developing a program for all those interested in intercollegiate debate An important
step in this development would be a return of the Glendy Burke Debate Scholarship now being
withheld by the Admissions Office. Obviously, more than the promise of a 'good education"
is needed to attract top high school debate talent. Tulane debate looks to a stronger future next
year with a core of experienced debators plus new members drawn by the hope for debate
scholarships.

Debate

Soccer

- '^-... '• ^g''-'*-''y^''-.-^t.''.;.^*^ i''-'p"'!---'--

Since its establishment in 1962, the
Tulane Soccer Team has posted nine
consecutive winning seasons. It has
progressed from a small club playing
exhibition-type, promotional games, to
a team of over 30 members competing
in full-scale collegiate competition.

Five times in the last six years, Tulane
has carried off the championship
trophy for the Gulf Coast Soccer
League. The last four years have pro-
duced a cumulative record of 42 wins,
nine losses, and seven ties.

After a rather slow start which pro-
duced frustrating ties in three of the
first five matches, the fortunes of the
team progressed steadily until its rec-
ord was 1 1 wins, two losses, and three
ties. Both losses came at the hands (or
feet, rather) of non-collegiate oppo-
nents.

Although the Soccer Team enjoys its
identity as an athletic club, its lack of
funds forces the members to pay for
equipment and traveling expenses from
their own pockets. In addition, the club
must often scrounge or wait for a field,
rating a mere third place behind both
intramural and fraternity endeavors. In
spite of these usual problems, however,
the team does promise another suc-
cessul season next year.

—Fred King

PAGE 74 / Club Sports

front:

PAUL MATLIN
MARK ROGERS
TONY BONO
MUHAMMED BIZANTI
JIMMY STONE
VICTOR LUNYONG
CARLOS BAUMANN
AGELI ELMERI
IVAN DIAZ
MARK FELL
FRED KING. COACH

back:

DON SOMMERS
TIM HUMMEL
REINALDO CASTILLO
STEVE KORBECKI

ROBERTO OWEN
REINER ERNST
SEAN GALVIN
RICK HEBLER
BOB ABRAHSON
RICHARD HARRIS
STEVE TROXLER
JIMMY SAN MARTIN
FELIPE WOHL

COULDN'T MAKE (T

VINCENTE CALABRESE

PAUL SILLS

ROB BURRILL

ALI RIAHI

INGO FORTH

DENIS DIEGO

~ ... -KNEElWG)-"--.;- ■■ - "■'■

.. -JyllKE KEYES , • ;
dHARLIE--MONNpT.

f'RiTKf-'EtLl'S- .-'.'
■/DENIflSWUICH"

■BOB EDMUNDS ON

-GEpR

y^i^3■EAN^REZ - ■^;.. --i'.;;' , "-
' CHA_B^LES"-SE-_Sfr.CROI-X"
:-aOB W-A-GMA'rT~- ■
-•■BRIAN .TRA-viSr . : -; ■-
V 'AM'Ofp.DaPISANI-'^ ;.

J.OiJNMERRILl?--^-
'MIKE MARRITi: "• Vi'-i

■' - '■-:^a©HN:"'HOV^ELli. ^i^J-ii--^' '.,
. ' ■■|;'E^■■LAtl):^E■R"■^/;'Jt7;i.-,$~^:^■-
lB bDMUNUi;0_N ■■ •.--- , 'Htti.N.uLu.uuKi&Ai\ir '__■-._■:"'-- ^H^^:^S'^Qj^,':':>''t^-'.;^^,-^--
PRGE'STELLINSS<-" .:---:;^.>:^ -STAN SMITH V. "^ _?^^.;■■,.- ■•-"i.-^-'".aWP?'BiJGHE^;-^^j-v>,,> ..

The Tulane Rugby Team brought its season to a
close with a successful record of 12 wins and four
losses. Tulane's team was well-seasoned with veterans
this year. With the anchors of a strong scrum, averag-
ing six feet and 200 pounds each, the scrum utilized
effective ball control, allowing the backs to exhibit
strong running, speed, and depth. On the whole, Tu-
lane fielded one of its best balanced teams ever, as
evidenced by its winning record.

Significant victories included an 11-3 win over
archrival LSU. a gruelling 6-0 victory over the inventors
of the game, the British from the H.M.S. Jupiter, and
finally taking a second place in the highly competitive
Mardi Gras Tournament, over such teams as Houston.
Waterloo (Canada), University of Toronto, Clemson,
Memphis, and the University of Wisconsin. With its
impressive record, Tulane finds itself in the top 20
teams in the nation.

The rugby team has a bleak future unless it can
recruit a significant number of undergraduates to fill
the ranks of the 20 or so veterans leaving in the next
two years. With the concerted effort of a recruiting
program next September, hopefully Tulane will be able
to field two teams where everyone who joins will play.
With better organization next year, and an extensive
publicity campaign, the merits of next year's team will
be spread on campus and throughout the city.

— Rudick Murphy
A&S 74

Rugby

/ PACE 77

Pan-hel

Basketball— Zeta Beta Tau; Bowling— Zeia Beta Tau;
Touch Football—Sigma Alpha Epsilon; Go/f— Sigma
Nu; Handball— Kappa Sigma; Softball— Zeta Beta
Tau; Trac/c— Sigma Nu; Siv/mm/ng— Sigma Alpha
Epsilon; l/o//eyba//— Alpha Sigma Phi

Intramurals

CAMPUS & DORM LEAGUE CHAMPIONS:

Badminton-Jay Schiller (A & S), Gary Rosmarin

(Phelps); Basketball Free Throws— Kenny Davis

(Navy R.O.T.C), Will Rodriguez (Irby);

Basketball-LasN School, Irby; Bowling— ACT, Irby;

CA7ess-Michael Ballotti (A & S), Eric Jones

(Derickson); Cross Counfry-Bill McCray (Air Force

R.O.T.C), Mike Willoughby (Phelps); Duplicate

Br/dge-Anthony Ng and Alvin Aubry (Med School),

Arnie Ricker and Ron Beelman (Creighton); Field

Goal Kicking— Ken Ducote (New/man), David

Hollander (Phelps); Touch Football-Navy R.O.T.C,

Phelps; Go/f-Charles Rosen (Navy R.K.T.C), Gary

Saginor (Irby); Hanc/da//-Robert Thompson (A & S),

Tom Assad (Irby); Poo/— Hugh Manson

(Engineering), Gary Saginor, (Irby);

Soccer-Engineering, McBryde; Soffda//-Navy

R.O.T.C, Irby; Squash— Russ Mericle (Business

School); Dan Nash (Ayres); Siv/mm/ng-Medical

School, Irby; Table Tennis-Jetf Wiener (A & S),

Bob Griffin (Derickson); Tenn/s-Steve Foldes (Law^

School), Gary Rosmarin (Phelps); 7ug-0-l/Var-Navy

R.O.T.C, Phelps; Vo//eyba//— Newman Club, Irby.

PAGE 78 / Club Sports

/ PACE 79

- 1

Rugby

t»-'

Sailing

WOMEN'S NATIONAL INTERCOLLEGIATE
SAILING CHAMPIONSHIP

ANNAPOLIS, MD.
BALDWIN WOOD

NEW ORLEANS, LA. Isl

DOUGLAS CUP

LONG BEACH, CAL. 1s1

NEW YORK INTERSECTIONAL,
NEVINS TROPHY

GREAT NECK. N.Y. 1111

TEXAS A. & M. INVITATIONAL

HOUSTON, TEX. Isl

S.E.I.S.A. KEELBOAT CHAMPIONSHIP

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 7tl

SUGAR BOWL

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 2n(

WINDJAMMER

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 1sl

ST. PETERSBURG INVITATIONAL

ST. PETERSBURG, FLA. 2n(

KENNEDY CUP

ANNAPOLIS. MD. Isl

WESTERN ELIMINATIONS,
S.E.I.S.A. DINGHY CHAMPIONSHIPS

FORT WORTH. TEX. Isl

S.E.I.S.A. DINGHY CHAMPIONSHIP
k NEW ORLEANS. LA. 1s1

T.U.

OPPONENT

PENSACOLA

SPRING HILL

H.M.S. JUPITER

HAMMOND R.F.C.

L.S.U.

HAMMOND R.F.C.

SPRING HILL

L.S.U.

SPRING HILL

HAMMOND R.F.C.

LOYOLA

2ND

MARDI GRAS TOURNAMENT

CLEMSON

MEMPHIS

PALMER

Soccer

T.U.

OPPONENT

RICE

L.S.U.

LOYOLA

U. SOU. MISS.

L.S.U.

L.S.U.N.O.

«H.M.S. JUPITER

«OLYMPIA SOCCER CLUB

DELGADO

L.S.U.N.O.

'PENSACOLA N.A.S.

DELGADO

L.S.U.N.O.

DELGADO

L.S.U.N.O.

DELGADO

("Non-league Exhibition matches]

student Senate

A major concern of the 1 970-71 Student Senate has
been that of communications within the University
community. At the level of communication among
the students themselves, the Senate's primary
weapon was the "Yellow Lorries," a one-page publi-
cation of the Student Senate Office distributed sev-
eral times monthly. Besides giving notice of the
various Student Senate activities, the "Yellow Lor-
ries" contained items of community and national
concern which were felt to be of interest to the
students. Another approach to this student-to-
student contact was the development of working
relationships between the Student Senate and the
student governments of the 11 colleges of the Uni-
versity, especially with those such as University Col-
lege which, prior to this year, had had no organized
student government.

At the level of communication between the stu-
dents and the other groups of the University, the
Student Senate initiated the "University Forum"
series and strove for greater student participation
in the University governance process. The forums,
held once each week, allowed the students to air
their gripes about chronic University problems and
to discuss them with various members of the faculty
and the administration; topics such as University
Food Services, housing, the Health Service, the drug
situation nn campus, and the University's financial
crisis were typical.

Students, this year, also found themselves with
a greater voice in University governance. For the
first time, students, through three non-voting repre-
sentatives, were given direct access to the Board
of Administrators. Students served as voting
members of 13 University Senate committees, and
four students, elected from the Student Senate,
served as voting members of the University Senate.
Through such representation, the Student Senate
was able to communicate its views on all matters
of concern to the University and especially those
having to do with student life. The five student rep-
resentatives on the University Senate Committee on
Student Affairs were able to hammer out agreements
concerning the student Senate's and Student Wel-
fare Committee's recommendations concerning the
co-residence dorm and the 24-hour visitation pro-
posals; the Student Senate in conjunction with the
Student Affairs Committee also helped draft a new
Student Conduct Code. The Student Senate's traffic
and parking proposals, aimed at discouraging un-
necessary parking on campus, were dealt with fa-
vorably by the University Senate Committee on Traf-
fic and Security. As a result of action taken by a
student representative on the Committee on Aca-
demic Ceremonies, President Longenecker has
agreed to consult with various student body leaders
in the selection of future commencement speakers.
A last effort made by the Student Senate in attempt-
ing to deal with the problem of communications
between students and the administration was the
sponsoring of arrangements whereby various
members of the Board of Administrators had break-
fast with students at C.R. and Bruff before their May
6th meeting.

What else has the Student Senate done this year?

1) brought the campus a 5C; Xerox machine,

2) sponsored Clothing and Blood Drives,

3) made its views known (to "Big John", the N.O.
City Council, etc.) about the proposed Missis-
sippi River Bridge,

k 4) donated $50. to the Kent State Legal Aid De-
fense Fund,

5) sponsored (in conjunction with LSUNO) an Ed-
ucational Reform Conference,

6) sponsored a student body referendum on the
Peoples' Peace Treaty,

7) donated $60. to help the campaign for passage
of the city bond issue for the construction of
a new Parish Prison,

8) sponsored on May 5th a Memorial Service on
the quad in memory of those killed in Vietnam,
at Kent State, and at Jackson State,

9) provided free food for several thousand Mardi
Gras guests, provided sleeping space on the
quad and under the stadium, provided student
marshals to assist the extremely cooperative
Security Force, provided daily Mardi Gras infor-
mation bulletins, and kept the Student Senate
Office open and operative 24 hours a day during
the Carnival period, and

10) sent Spiro T. Agnew a thesaurus.

—Jane Zimmerman

PAGE 82 / Club Sports

OFFICERS:

President:

Ralph Wafer

V.-P Administration:

Leon Trice

V.-P. Finance:

Ken Levine

Secretary:

Jane Zimmerman

U. C Board President:

Sonny Wiegand

C-A.C.T.U.S. Chairman:

John Carey

SENATORS;
Architecture:
Alvin Cox
George Miller
A & S:
Brian Bash
Bruce Berger
Jerry Clark
Bruce Feingerts
Mike Florie
Rony Fontana
Chuck Leaness
George Nelson
Steve Schuster
Hugh Taylor
Gary Weiss

Engineering:
Lea Crump
Jim Koontz
Jack Laborde
Dave O'Brien
Graduate Business:
Chuck Gazanek
Jim Hansen
Graduate Medicine:
Geoff Land
Diane Mordaunt
Ken Olander
Graduate School:
Bob Albergotti
James Edson
Bonnie Keller
Brian Moran
Bob Raich
Law:

Glenn Bradford
Dan Del Priore
John Landrem
Medicine:
Scott Kellermann
Bill LaCorte
J, T. McOuitty
Jack Roniger
Newcomb:
Barbara Dickson
Daniele Dutry

Jill Ehrenburg

Susan Fife

Barbara Hall

Cathy Nelson

Carole Swaney

Marion Shostrom

Public Health & Trap. Medicine:

Dr. John Harreil

Roseann Losklll

Social Work:

Sue Kingston

Karen Lewis

University College:

Richard Berry

Frank Jones

Dale Ladnier

Norman Pendergrass

Eve Valentine

Yvonne Vonderhaar

Steve Welsh

COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN:
Academic Affairs— John Barnett
Alumni Relations— Sonny Wiegand
Awards— Jim Lee
£/ecf/ons— Dan Del Priore
Publicity— David Bauman
Special Projects— M\ke Weinstock
Student IVe/fere— Chuck Leaness

/ PAGE 83

iHlB Wb

Brotherhood throughout the fraternity

system has taken on added meaning

as each fraternity has closely

scrutinized and re-evaluated its

ideology. As a result, the social base

upon which every fraternity was

founded has been broadened to

embody the academic, political, and

cultural dimensions which are so

important to our time. Fraternity is no

longer a social entity, but a vital

complement to university life.

In an age of war and social unrest,

fraternities afford students a home

away from home: a sounding board

upon which opinions can be shared,

and convictions confirmed. The

individual, his needs, his likes, and

his dislikes have become the focal

points of fraternity policy. For this

reason, the microsocial environment

that fraternity offers has been

instrumental in establishing a

meaningful direction for its members

whose bewilderment and frustration

has resulted in apathy. Fraternity is

remarkably sensitive to change, a

change that each individual member

can effect.

Recognizing the need for individual

autonomy on the fraternity level, the

Interfraternity Council has abandoned

its role as a governing body, and has

established itself as a service

organization. We believe that the

laissez-faire atmosphere under which

the fraternities now function is vital

to their relevance as a social

brotherhood. ^

— Gregory Bertucci

Chairman, Tuiane I.F.C.

SEATED:

PAT HERRINGTON 'SIGMA NU

BENNY EICHHOLZ/ZETA BETA TAU

DR. K. RIESS, ADVISOR

JEFF KINSELL SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON

STEVE WEBB 'SIGMA PI

DAN MAUTHE/SIGMA PI

STEWART KEPPER/SIGMA CHI

SID MARLOWE/SIGMA NU

GREG BERTUCCI SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON

ALAN STEWART'DELTA KAPPA EPSILON

ALAN LAX/PHI KAPPA EPSILON

JOHN BRADLEY/PHI KAPPA EPSILON

CHUCK BRENT BETA THETA PI

BOB GREENSTEIN'TAU EPSILON PHI

JIM WITHERSPOON/KAPPA SIGMA

BEN BIALICK/ALPHA TAU OMEGA

STANDING:

GEORGE MCGOWIN/ALPHA SIGMA PHI
MIKE CLADWELL/KAPPA SIGMA
CHUCK MAGILL/ALPHA TAU OMEGA

IN absentia:

JEFF ARMITAGE/SIGMA CHI
JOHN BAEHR/DELTA TAU DELTA
BRUCE BERMAN/SIGMA ALPHA MU
BOB IRUINE/DELTA TAU DELTA
SANDY WEBB/PI KAPPA ALPHA
BILL WEBSTER/KAPPA ALPHA

JEI

Newcomb Panhellenic

FRONT:

JEAN BEUTNER ALPHA DELTA PI

BONNIE MOULTON PHI MU

NANCY SWIREN SIGMA DELTA TAU

MARCIA BENNETT PI BETA PHI

KAREN MEADER PHI MU

RONA SIMMONS PHI MU

back:

CARMEN CRAMER PI BETA PHI

JOAN CLONINGER KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA

FRANCES PAPPAS ALPHA OMICRON PI

ANDI SERVOS SIGMA DELTA TAU

PATTY HAUSER KAPPA ALPHA TAU

BETSY KEYES ALPHA OMICRON PI

MIMI SCHAUB ALPHA OMICRON PI

DALE DANE CHI OMEGA

CATHY BOUDREAUX ALPHA DELTA PI

PATSY FRIEDLER ALPHA EPSILON PHI

PAT PRINS ALPHA EPSILON PHI

KAREN CONLEY PI BETA PHI

ANDREA RICARDS CHI OMEGA

JENNY JACKSON KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA

BETH CHILDRESS KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA

KAREN LAUTZ KAPPA ALPHA TAU

Individualism is the emphasis— saying

what you want to say, doing what's

right for you. being

yourself— conformity being ostracized

and rejected. Verbal expression and

action are expected of todays

students. Each issue demands a

stand; the war. ecology, abortion.

drug control. The perpetual question

is "what do you think?"

This continuous bombardment and

exposure to new ideas necessarily

precipitates a striving toward

self-knowledge and understanding.

achieved most readily through

casual, impromtu discussions. The

sorority house affords the friendly

atmosphere needed for discovering

and developing oneself. Expressing

how and what you feel without great

apprehension, having a feeling of

belonging and a warmth away from

home, and of primary significance.

the absense of apathy, only

accomplished by individuals working

together

Newcomb Panhellenic Council exists

only to coordinate sorority activities

through cooperation Restrictions on

behavior and ideas are not the

purpose of the Panhellenic,

Panhellenic's aim is the development

of interpersonal relationships. As

long as individuals seek friendships.

sororities will survive.

-Frances Pappas

Vice-President.

Newcomb

Panhellenic

-- -ii..- ".:,^.'fct"=^ ■-" ■

-'«»>'"

tSi»."^-^i

:"^^^g^^i^^ m^:'-:b

JAMBALAYA 1971

EDITOR
MATT ANDERSON

PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLICES

FRANCISCO ALECHA, WYHE DAWSON,

PATRICIA HOPKINS, CAYLE LETULLE,

AND SHEILA SILVER

CONTRIBUTORS

DANA ABBOTT. WAYNE ANDERSON, GREG BERTUCCI.
RILL BROWN, FLOYD BURAS, BRUCE DANNER, JILL
DUNCAN. TONY FONTANA. JIM HARVEY, KATHY KEIM,
FRED KING. TONY LANASA, GAYLE LETULLE, RUDICK
MURPHY. FRANCES PAPPAS, KEN WEIL, SYLVIA YOUNG,
AND JANE ZIMMERMAN.

PHOTOGRAPHY

MATT ANDERSON/' cover, S, 6-9, 12-13, 16-19, 24, 26-
27. 28-29 (top & bottom), 30 (top), 31-33, (top,
niicl-riglil), & color), 35 (color, & bottom left), 36
(top). 38-41, 43-53, 55 (bottom), 56-57, 61, 66, 68-
73, 74 (right), 75-78, 82-85. BUDDY brimberg/ 67.
FARRKLL iiockmeier/ 2, 54, 55 (top), 58-59, 60,
62-63, 64-65, 79, 80-81, 86-7. JOHN JAMES/ 10-11,
14-15, 20-21. 28 (middle), 30 (color), 34 (mid-
Icfl), 35 (middle. & bottom right), 36 (color), 37.
STAN I.ONCF.NECKER/ 29 (color). DR. WINSTON

RiEHL/ 22-23. MIKE SMITH/ 25, 74 (left), 88.

nS71

TULANE

IME\A/

VOLUME

JAMBALAVA

UNIVERSITY

LOUISIANA

BOOK 4

'One must not tie a ship to a single anchor,
nor life to a single hope-
tor no human condition is ever permanent,
so do not be overjoyed in good fortune,
nor too sorrowful in misfortune."

—Ronald S. Bertucci

Ronald S. Bertucci, Arts and Sciences 71

Dr. Ann Fischer. Newcomb

Stephen Huffman, Engineering 71

Dean John W. Lawrence. Architecture

Roberta Stuart, Newcomb 74

Dr. David Topping, Arts and Sciences

-■i^

fi / TnCOTTFTTT LOW— WHERE>TR HE MAY BE
14/ THE TULANIANS— OH, HAPPY DAY!
ir? BEAUREGARD SQUARE

18 / SOMETHING "TO NIBBLE ON"— DIRECTION '71
32 / JOHN W. LAWRENCE: THE MAN AND HIS REGION
36 HONORARIES

40 ARTICHOKES. MAGNOLIAS, AND THE NEW SENSIBLES
44 / THOSE WHO HAVE MADE IT, 1971
58 / PARANOIA

60 / THE GUMBO— "A DEAD NUDE ISN'T SO BAD .. ."
62 / BUT WHO WAS PAULINE TUUANT:?

RoecRT c. Low. M. D.

Frank M. Phillippi. M. D. E. O. Schahnitiky, M. D.

Robert L. Haves, M. D.

E. L. •niANDKl.L. M. D

The brewtdn Medical Center

McMruLAN Ave.
BREWTON, ALABAMA

Randolph M. McDowell
business manager

May 28, 1970

Dr. Herbert E. Longnecker

President ^^

Tulane University of Louisiana

Tulane University Station

New Orleans, Louisiana 70118 y.

Dear Dr. Longnecker:

I hate to disturb you with this letter but feel
that I must speak out about certain activities at Tulane
University. My first reaction when I viewed the notorious
picture of Tulane University students burning President
Nixon in effigy, which was in Time Magazine several weeks ago,
was one of disbelief. I did not believe that the
administrators and president of such a great university would
allow such to go on. Disregarding whether or not President
Nixon is liked or disliked by the vast majority of students,
the office of the President of the United States is the
highest office to be held in this country. The office itself
demands the respect of the entire nation, and the man who
holds this office is there because of the mandate of the
people of this country. Disrespect to this office is comparable
to gross disrespect to our flag, and to our nation and what it
stands for. Unfortunately you are held responsible for the
actions of the University and for the actions of its students.
It is hopeful that I have been misinformed about certain other
things going on at Tulane but until I understand the situation
better, I am withholding further contributions to this University
Of course my contributions are small and will not be missed, but
as an interested alumnus of our University I felt that I had to
speak out.

Very truly yours ,

REL:k
cc :
cc:
cc:
cc :

Robert E. Low, M.D.
H., Medicine Class, 1946

Chairman, Board of Administrators
Chairman Alumni Fund
President, Tulane Alumni Assoc.
Tulane Hullabaloo

TO ROBERT LOW-
WHEREVER HE MAY BE

The letter which appears on the opposite page, when
I first read it more than a year ago, seemed to contain
the rather commonly held opinion of a typical alumnus
who had lost touch with his University. But, as I found
out recently, the Robert Low of 1971-while maintaining
his concept of resolute respect for national symbols-
proved to be a supporter of student ■Tights," an envious
admirer of those students today who have more courage
than students had in his 'day' to stand up to faculty
members and administrators. But more important, Robert
Low revealed that I was the first person from Tulane to
respond directly to his letter. True, he had received two
very impersonal form letters from the University, but in
the interim, neither helped in any way to placate his
distress over the events that occurred last spring.

Who should be blamed for the lack of communication
with Robert Low, and for that matter, all the Robert Lows
from the class of 1946, or 1926, or 1966? I would deduce
that all of us here at Tulane in 1971, as well as all the
Robert Lows out there, all 40,000 of them, are all partially
at fault. To the students and the "nine to five-rs" who
run the University, 1 would suggest that we can or should
go out of our way to find, question, and correct wherever
necessary, the misnomers and misconceptions which
others might have about this University, about the 'stu-
dent movement' concept, and how it relates to Tulane.
But more than that, I would hope we would approach
the Robert Low's with a willingness to seek out and
understand their philosophies and their concepts. Like-
wise, the Robert Low's should not let their questions go
unanswered. If they believe that they are mismformed.
as this Dr. Low hoped that he was. they should also seek
out the truth from other sources; to be frustrated by
silence, as Dr. Low was for over a year, can only breed
further misgivings.

On the following pages, we have presented the opinions
of five writers, two students, two faculty members, and
one administrator, all of whom have set about to explain
what has occurred in the past 20 months at this institu-
tion. Their opinions are not intended to be taken individ-
ually as the correct interpretation: rather, we would hope
that the articles would stimulate each reader to formulate
his own interpretation of what has occurred here. Then
seek out a Robert Low or two; as an exercise of the
intellect, it may be a worthwhile endeavor.

—Matt Anderson

June, 1971

-■'-' ^-■^-— '^ >j---*^ >. . ^'.«_:

/ PAGE 7

^Ri

^^^»

#A«lft /

.-^

-y ■"

Why were there quite literally only one-tenth
the number of campus disturbances this year as
compared to last? Why did Tulane have no dif-
ficulty this year? What has changed?

I suppose everyone on this and other cam-
puses has asked those or similar questions. And
the answers, if they can be found, will be impor-
tant, for the only way to make reasonable guesses
about the future is to have evolved intelligent
conclusions about the past.

It would be satisfying to say that the campuses
are so different because tfie world is so different.
Yet the horror of Vietnam continues. The Galley
trial and the current official investigations of 55
other Americans— including a general— for atro-
cities must have heightened our awareness of
the cost of war to the American living as well
as to the Vietnamese and American dead. Prob-
lems of race continue. Read Harold Sylvester's
statement in Book One of this Jamb. Oil spills,
mercury poisoning, and the death of the eagles
document the continued defacing and befouling
of our earth.

The national issues are still here. And even the
local issues of substance remain. The Dubinsky
affair— the most inflammatory issue of a year
ago— is sufficiently unresolved to have been use-
ful this spring to anyone who sought to promote
a confrontation.

The difference is not in issues. The difference
is in people. On this campus at least, people are
dealing with people in a manner markedly dif-
ferent from the manner of last year. A number
of people have said that communication is better.
And it is, but that's not all of the explanation.
"Good" communication exists when meaning is
clearly conveyed. The vituperation associated
with the TLF movement of last spring accurately
conveyed meaning. It also made rational reso-
lution of disagreement difficult.

This year people are hearing other people. To
hear someone— to really hear him— is to admit to
him that we are less than certain that we have
the answer, to tell him that perhaps he can help
in the resolution of the difficulty, and to involve
him actively in developing a solution, I like the
term Robert King Merton used in his com-
mencement address: "the new sensibles."
Somehow, the place has become nearly overrun
with "sensibles" this year.

Where did the "sensibles" come from? Actu-
ally, nearly all of us were here last year. We
changed. Tom Ireland in the first Book of the
Jamb gives significant credit to the Tulane Sum-
mer Conference. Doubtless, the Conference was
one of a number of things that convinced us that
if we take Tulane seriously, we had better take
each other seriously. Though the TLF "libera-
tion" of the University Center last spring may
have begun in the revolution-should-be-fun spirit
of Jerry Rubin's Do It. it ended with rumors of
violent counter-liberation and an awareness that
revolution can be dangerous.

In sum, I think a number of events of last spring
and summer made many of us just flat scared
for Tulane; and that made us "sensibles."

One wonders how well we learned our lessons.
Tacked to one of my bookshelves is an epigram
inscribed on a large scratch pad by one of the
Summer Conference participants: "Once upon
a time there was a fairy princess . . . but she
didn't last." I kept it for what I think the young
lady is saying about me and my generation and
for what I think it says about her. But does it
say something about Tulane of this year and
next?

—Dr. Edward Rogge,

Director of Admissions
and Financial Aid

The kaleidoscopic turmoil that swept
across college campuses last spring
was followed this spring by a myste-
rious calm as the dominant mood at
Tulane and most universities. A
combination of outrage at President
Nixon's announcement of the Cam-
bodian invasion and the shock of the
shootings at Kent State and Jackson
State had sent students into a severe
wave of gut-reaction violence or
protest on many campuses in 1970.
Thousands of students who con-
verged on Washington in May to
protest the war threatened to be-
come one of the most potent political
froces in the nation.

But despite great hopes for thrust-
ing the university, as an institution,
into the American political process,
the campuses remained relatively
quiet in 1971. Tulane tended to fol-
low this national pattern. The spring
of 1970 brought the fiery destruction
of one of the barracks, the takeover
of the University Center, the anti-
Cambodian demonstrations, the
hanging of Nixon in effigy, the flag-
pole incident. The next fall Tulane
floundered through its normal winter
hibernation en route to predicted
trouble in the spring. The question
was, what would "it" be this year?
"It never happened.

But why were the campuses calm
this past year despite America's
continued involvement in Southeast
Asia and the constant student con-
cern over our domestic problems?
Some point to the absence of shock-
ing events like Kent and Jackson
State, the decline of attacks on stu-
dents by Spiro T., the loss of glamor
of extremism, or even the frustration
of students with the lack of success
of protests. The "movement" has

definitely strayed away from its for-
merly nihilistic tendencies.

Each campus has its own individ-
ual combination of reasons for the
quiet. Tulane's reasons were proba-
bly as complex as any, and any
speculation is almost purely guess.
Could it have been the successful
"Year of the Green"? or how about
the completion of the "Memorial to
an IBM Punch Card" (better known
as the new Science Center)? A more
realistic explanation may be that
considerable progress was made
here to increase the voice of stu-
dents in University governance.
Placing students on the Board of
Administrators, the University Sen-
ate, and vital committees was a move
in the right direction.

Still another reason for the calm
may have been the realization that
to show hostility toward the uni-
versity because of policies of the
national government simply does not
make sense. The university should
be a rallying point for constructive
change rather than a martyr for dis-
placed aggression.

Hopefully, next year students will
continue to avoid violence. But Tu-
lane students and students all over
the country should assert them-
selves to bring about necessary
change. Students can, collectively
and individually, apply effective
pressures for constructive change in
our society without unnecessary
disturbances. Let's hope our pleas
for progress are not ignored be-
cause of the lack of thunder and
lightning.

—Bruce Feingerts

A & S '72

One can easily come forth with a
string of cliches to answer the ques-
tion, "Why has the campus been so
quiet this year?" Maybe the cliches
are right. And maybe the fact that
the cliches are right is the nub of
the students' problem in 1971. So-
ciologists like myself make a busi-
ness of analyzing the social world,
an enterprise formerly the domain of
youth feeling their way into identities
of themselves and their world. There
are too many of us sociologists
around, and we have too many an-
swers (all of which seem to be at
least a little bit right). Worst of all,
most of our answers carry a sort of
sadness about the plight of being
human and the dehumanizing con-
tingencies of having society forced
upon us. This sort of realism can be
learned too early; there is an advan-
tage in stumbling into the facts of
loneliness and powerlessness rather
than having them anticipated. Igno-
rance can be bliss. Be that as it may,
today's students are exposed to their
own fallibilities too early and too
much.

Despite my own warnings, 1 will try
to provide my own analysis of this
question, more from the viewpoint of
the professor than of the sociologist.
A first answer is that the Tulane
campus was quiet because it has
always been quiet. Maybe the events
of last year were not really events-
over and over we hear the statement
that only a miniscule proportion of
the student body was involved in the
"uprisings"; this seems largely cor-
rect. Furthermore, we can say that
nothing really happened; the occu-
pation of the U.C. and the flagpole
incident may have been non-events
in terms of their consequences.
Thus, if nothing happened this year
or last year or the year before last
year, what is there to explain? But
that conclusion really isn't much fun;
we surely can find something to ex-
hume and dissect.

The students of 1970 were re-
vulsed with their country more than
they were with Tulane University.
Tulane happened to be a handy rep-
resentative of American society, and
consequently provided a stage for an
attempted happening. Tulane was
and is representative of the larger
society in many respects: elitism,
rising "taxation" with few visible
benefits, credibility gaps, and an iso-
lation of the business of governance
from the "people." These are all de-
scriptive of Tulane to a certain de-
gree, but are equally descriptive of
oiher American universities. The
acted-out revulsion seemed to have
some effects locally. The weekly
forums with administrators seem to

be a usefully symbolic result; likewise
the Mushroom has been a most val-
uable addition to the University, al-
though there may be some question
as to whether it might have been
established "anyway." But these
"concessions," if they can rightfully
be called such, are really not much.
But neither were the demands.

Maybe the 1971 student body was
"cooled out" by these concessions.
But this seems too simple and too
wrong. These were not the changes
that were desired. What was wanted
was an end to the powerlessness of
the people in American society. But
the past year has seen this power-
lessness grow in new and unex-
pected ways. In my mind, the action
of the grand jury in Ohio in response
to the Kent State tragedy provided
a clear and final answer to the ques-
tion of the worth of protesting. Thus
the quietude.

Another facet in explaining this
year's "peace" is the decline in
health of Mother Tulane. Not only
threatened with repudiation and
permanent insult from the AAUP, she
has also been reduced to an almost
bare cupboard and a tattered frock
in terms of the financial future. It just
seems unfair to beat on the old girl
when she's really down. In my expe-
rience I have never seen a student
body or faculty that was so self-
flagellating about the quality of its
university as the Tulane community.
This has been greatly tempered this
year; those who can't leave her may
not love her, but at least have put
up with her to a greater degree than
before. This change in attitude per-
haps reflects the national insecurity
of universities in general; the events
of 1 970 clearly informed the powerful
that the universities were one citadel
of the enemy. Consequently we are
being starved into shaping up.

Finally, I must put forth my own
eccentric view that students have
turned away from protest and revo-

lution because of the way most of
them were brought up. The pseu-
do-psychiatric strategies advocated
by Dr. Spock ef al. have obliterated
that ancient and blessed potential of
humankind which I would call ego
strength or ego integrity. We all went
through various forms of protest and
self-defense when we were kids, but
sooner or later we "came around"
to the "correct" discovery that what
really wrong was us. This is the con-
sequence of the "threat of withdra-
wal of love" childrearing strategy
employed by the enlightened middle
class for the past 25 years or so.
Thus to replace the protest groups
we have encounter groups. Here the
individual can find the real source
of his troubles and complaints: him-
self. The University Health Service's
psychiatric service boomed this year
as it never did before; the flow of
prescription psychiatric drugs ap-
peared almost to equal the fun-drug
traffic. This is where the myth of the
counter-culture is really stripped
bare: this generation has been
taught to "adjust" at any cost; the
fear of rejection runs so high that
friendship will be purchased from a
psychiatrist or In an encounter group
as the first resort rather than the last
resort. Despite words to the contrary,
we don't trust the reality of worth of
our own being; we seek to change
ourselves instead of changing the
social structure, insuring an ever-
flowing supply of love and accep-
tance. With this value so deeply en-
grained in the youth generation, with
drugs seen as the only route to a
better reality (more explicit than the
elders' climbing into their martinis),
the status quo has little to fear now
or in the future.

This is a terrifying prognosis and
explanation for the quiet campus. I
hope it's wrong.

Dr. Paul Roman

Sociology,
Newcomb

TTwmms

Jelll-ni^i

jf IH ir 11

in III nil 11

The class of 71 lived through probably the most exciting,
exhausting, exhilarating, and anguished four years in
Tulane's history. Conflict between the students and the
faculty, between the students and the administration,
between the students and the community reached a high
point in the spring of 1970. Nearly everyone expected
the troubles to continue to accelerate into the fall of 1970,
but quite the opposite happened. The academic year
1 970-71 has been as peaceful as any even in the suddenly
fashionable 1950's. I have been asked to speculate why
this peace fell. Naturally, no one can be sure, but listed
below are my best guesses. Since the same thing hap-
pened all over the country, the emphasis will not be on
persons and issues unique to Tulane.

(1) The recession. Revolutionaries need money and
leisure, strange as it may seem. Students began to worry
about getting a job when they graduated— the seller's
market of the 1960's disappeared and there was even
some indication that parents would be less generous.
There was a shift in atmosphere from expansiveness and
high rhetoric to more direct and immediate matters. Rev-
olutions come out of depressions, sometimes, and more
often, out of rapid expansions; but never out of reces-
sions.

(2) Faculty and administrative resistance. Punishment
began to be meted out to disruptive faculty and students.
Just as the recession saw the end of the decade-long
expansion of student economic power, so the sanctions
saw the end of the equally long expansion of student
freedom of behavior. Personal behavior will probably
continue to be largely unrestricted, but direct political
action will be limited.

(3) 7/76 loss of glamor of violence and direct action.
There was both a fascination with and aversion to vio-
lence during the late Sixties. Deaths at Kent State and
the University of Wisconsin tipped the balance against
violence. Many of the leftist leaders also lost the charisma
and moral influence that they previously had.

(4) Tfie cfiance of a student having to fight in the
Vietnam War and the uncertainty as to whether he would
be called were decreased. The war declined in scope
and severity and the lottery draft system took away a
large degree of uncertainty as to whom would be called.

(5) The race question became less involved in campus
politics. White students became disillusioned with Black
students. Black students became disillusioned with White
students. The inward turning of Black students lessened
all types of contact, including confrontation.

(6) Students gained more control over their personal
life. Many restrictions unrelated to students' academic
behavior were relaxed. This increased freedom eliminated
a variety of strongly felt grievances and also diverted
students from political issues.

(7) Students gained a larger voice in university govern-
ment. This is not only last, it is also very much least.
Students actually have very little more influence over the
running of the university in 1971 than in 1961. Although
"Student Power" was much talked about, students never
had much interest in running the university.

—Dr. Robert S. Robins

Political Science,
A & S

PAGE 12 /

From anathema.
Ill

to dialogue

to consciousness

This past spring most colleges and universities experi-
enced an unexpected calm on their campuses; the recur-
ring question, "Why was the campus quiet this year?",
haunted everyone from parents to the university pres-
idents, themselves. Tulane, not to be an exception by
any means, was equally free from the demonstrations,
marches and speech rallys which were so commonplace
in the spring of last year. This is not to say that the
students at Tulane had forgotten about the war in South-
east Asia, the Cambodian invasion or the atrocities at
both Kent and Jackson State. For reasons which I will
attempt to explain, the student interest and energies,
nationally as well as at Tulane, took a new and unan-
ticipated direction this past year.

On the national scene the politically committed leaders
were tactically and helplessly at ends. After everything
had failed, they could not think of much else to do. The
two alternatives open for them were, either to commit
themselves to long term projects (which, practically
speaking, did not look very bright) or they could just give
up. It is easy to see how the end result could be nothing
but frustration. When the politically involved student fol-
lowers are faced with frustration and are not committed
to full time action, they get bored very easily. Their only
alternative is to get back into themselves, to withdraw
from the political arena, and to return to their private
lives for reconciliation. The students involved in the
spring-wars of 1970 were just plain tired; tired of violence
and tired of repeating their unaswered call for a new way
of life.

On the local scene at Tulane, there were some very
definite reasons for the radical change in campus climate.
The first, and probably the best, explanation for the
change in mood was the absence of Tulane's radical
leaders. For various reasons, about which there is some
speculation, these leaders of last spring were not to be
found at fall registration. The second and most visible
reason for the turn about this year was the efforts made
by those students still concerned in bringing about mean-
ingful change, and by those few administrators sincerely
involved in bringing about increased and better com-
munications within the Tulane community. Their con-
certed attempt could be seen in the weekly university
forums, set up by Student Body President and ex-campus
radical, Ralph Wafer, to increase the dialogue between
the administration and the students. This effort in better-
ing communications was further aided by the increased
student representation on the Board of Administrators.
Finally, to get more student participation in the bodies
directly affecting the life of the student, the University
Center Governing Council was created with a student
elected as chairman.

It is important to point out that, if newly created efforts
to increase communication within the university commu-
nity are to work, the students must vigorously and actively
confront the administration with any and all changes
necessary for the improvement of their educational insti-

tution. As past events at Tulane, especially those most
recent, the spring of 70, have clearly indicated, if Tulane
is to move ahead as a viable and changing institution
of higher learning, the students will have to take a more
active and instrumental role.

Finally, a word must be mentioned here for what I think
is the new student activism going on behind the scenes
at Tulane. Because of our changing youth culture, and
because of the genuine frustration with national issues
and priorities, many students are putting their efforts to
work on a more personal level. Smaller groups are form-
ing on campus with more emphasis being placed on
personal growth and inter-personal relationships. This is
evident in the increased participation in encounter, and
so, called sensitivity groups. Students are looking inwards
for many of the answers which they could not find in
mass demonstrations. This renewed inner life, which
Charles Reich calls "Consciousness III," will be what is
needed for a new and better community and world.

—Lee Trice

Architecture '72

/ PAGE 13

the tulanians
oh, happy day!

The Spring calendar at Tulane usually allows for a
campus riot, a deluge of rain, and the Tulanians' Spring
Show; this year (as mentioned in the previous articles),
no one showed up for the riot, and it failed to rain.
The Tulanians' however, attracted over 2700 people
to Dixon Hall over a three night stretch.

The Tulanians' popularity can be attributed to the
wider range in music the group now sings. Eleven years
ago when the organization was formed, light pop was
the only music sung. Much of the credit for this change
toward a wider variety in music and for the new ar-
rangements from original popular songs is due to the

PAGE 14 /

J J

ANOS: Irene
ell, Betsy Keys,
e Klllebrew, Debra
;iein, Gussie Morris,
and Mary RIckard.
ALTOS: Marldel Allen.
Jenny Jackson. Katy
Kostka. Janey Lazarow,
Nancy Seaver, Terry
Terrlll. TENORS: Andy
Allen, Keith Hooks.
Roger Longtx>tham.
and Jim Merrell.
BARITONES: Rick
Drake. Jim Farr. and
Jimmy Sheats.
BASSES: David
Bauman, and Mark
Wagner. PIANO: Stella
Jones. DRUMS: Rick
Mackie. GUITAR:
Randy Seybold, and
Mike Vargon. STRING
BASS: John Gray.

group's director, Leiand Bennett. Many have seen him
and his group seemingly mouthing words as they prac-
tice in the fish-bowl (the large listening room in the
University Center). Their work is not, however, unre-
warded—over an eight week period from March to May,
they performed at alumnae educational conferences
in Jackson and Biloxi, Mississippi, a three night stand
in Der Rathskeller, the Spring Show, and the Bob Hope
Show in Municipal Auditorium.

To refresh one's memory as to the type of music
which the Tulanians have "popularized" with their own
following, here are some of the songs which high-

lighted this year's spring performances; Sad Lisa (Cat
Stevens), Close to You and We've Only Just Begun
(the Carpenters), My Sweet Lord (George Harrison).
Save the Country (Laura Nyro), Requiem for the
Masses (the Association), Sunday Will Never Be the
Same (Spanky and Our Gang). Midnight Cowboy, Ev-
erybody's Talkin'. Jesus Christ Superstar, and Oh
Happy Day.

—Diane Burnside

Newcomb 71

/ PAGE 15

PAGE 16 /

PAGE 18 /

"... and because I believe brevity is the soul of wit, I only want
to make a couple of random comments. First, the Direction program
has become and will continue to be a timely and a sought-after forum
for some of America's most distinguished individuals. I think that we
all can be very proud of that fact. Second, the emphasis this year
in Direction has been an attempt to increase the interaction between
the speakers, the students, and the faculty. To do this we have created
the Direction "Living Room," which will be located on the second
floor of the University Center and which we sometimes know as the
Kendall Cram Room. And here I invite you, in fact I encourage you
to go over, to take your shoes off. to sit down— we have carpets over
there, there are a few things to nibble on ... to eat .. . sandwiches
. . . and I encourage you to— establish ... a relationship with some
of the speakers who have come— brevity sure is the soul of wit and
I'd better stop— a long way not to talk at you but to communicate
with you . . ." '.

—Clark Durant, Chairman, Direction '71

Wednesday, april 21st

PAGE 20 /

William f.
buckley, jr.

"What is it tiiat inappens when the gov-
ernment undertaites to do something?
They are saying now in Europe 'You
itnow what would happen if the Com-
munists took over the Sahara desert?'
to which the answer is one, 'nothing
for 50 years'— and two, 'there would be
a shortage of sand.' It seems that the
government has for reasons not fully
understood, an extraordinary capacity

(a) to accomplish nothing at all, and

(b) when it does end up In accomplish-
ing something, it is more often a nega-
tive than a positive.

". . . when the government addresses
itself to a particular problem, it seldom
seems to explore the strategic conse-
quences of it. So it is when we deal
with a farming problem, public hous-
ing, and with education. Plainly, we
have to recognize that that particular
amaigan of power and idealism tends
to be presumptively the most danger-
ous enemy not only of people who
desire to be efficient but of people who
desire to be free."

KODAK S'A F t T y

enoch
powell, m.p.

"It is human to wish to believe what
is pleasant and to disbelieve what is
unpleasant. Men are still prone to say
of those who tell them unwelcomed
truth, 'He hath a devil.' However, there
is also an active principle at worl< in
combating the admission of those facts
which would enable error to be
avoided. This is make-believe . . . Re-
sistance to the shattering of make-
believe is reinforced by a curious moral
phenomenon. It appears to those sus-
taining make-believe that they are
somehow performing a moral duty so
that willful blindness to facts or sup-
pression of facts is sanctified . . . Once
again, perhaps a trace of the primitive
magical belief in the power of words
to cause events: Don't say it, it won't
happen; don't mention it, it won't be
there."

BIT

-"""^

.■ ^

C
CM

^^-^^

>N ^

Li^

5^7^

><^^^

■ ■■

'^^^>

\/\ \

" ^

"IH

1^^

'^^

^ .-^*^-

M^tisi^

1^^^

thursd

HPr

W^'

"^v

^^'

". . . okay, this isn't the way the war all is, nobody Is suggesting that. There are a lot of good soldiers
there, there are a lot of good programs. But an awful lot of this stuff goes on. Anybody that doesn't
think so, just remember, the Pentagon itself said they knew nothing. General Westmoreland received
no word of My Lai-they announced this last fall-he had absolutely no word, no inclination of My
Lai until Arnold Ridenhour wrote his letter. I'll take their word on that ... but it leaves them open
to the inevitable charge that when something this serious, this traumatic, can go on and they have
no Inclination . . . It's not even a question of being easy to believe. It's a question of how prevalent
such attitudes are. I think it's much more prevalent than we've wanted to believe . . .

"... I guess I'll iust conclude with a sad story from a vet . . . One of them was telling me the
other day-a lot of them are angry at me because they think I popularized the myth of the average
Gl as being an atrocity man-they think the responsibility goes much higher. One of them was telling
me the other night-he was trying to explain why he wasn't such a bad guy. And he said he had
been on a long range reconnalsance patrol for three or four days in the field. They were coming
back on the outskirts of their landing zone, and they saw somebody, some Gl raping a Vietnamese
woman. And he said 'Man, we blew them both away.' I don't want to be too subtle. Remember his
point was. We just might kill a gook but this time we took the guy with her.' I did ask, 'Why did
you kill the woman? " And he said, 'She wouldn't have been much good anyway.' But mind you,
that's the way they are-they need a lot of help psychologically, et cetera . . ."

friday
april 23rd

jerrold
footlick:

"Could each of you gentlemen
assess why you think the cam-
puses have been quiet, or ap-
parently quiet this year, as op-
posed to some of the previous
years?"

dr. russell kirk:

"I think the main reason Is that on many a campus, the students
feel that they've been used by various forces. I'll give you one sam-
ple—after the Kent State affair last year in Ohio, the staging ground
for protest throughout Ohio, and indeed throughout a larger region,
was Oberlin. The SDS and other organizations came in there and
used dormitories and other buildings as a staging ground for protest
across the country. Well, Oberlin had a rally about a week or so
ago with an eminent radical speaker coming. In contrast to the pre-
vious year, only about 150 turned out, and of those 150, many were
highly critical, very suspicious, and they made it clear they weren't
going to march on Washington. Clearly, the sentiments were that
they had been used at Kent State and elsewhere and don't intend
to have their heads bashed in any more for some ideologue, whose
motives they question."

dr. harold taylor:

"The campuses have become in a sense emotionally and politically
exhausted . . . and a lot of the students who organized things last year
have graduated; there is a new chemical compound in this year's student
body. But just looking at it from the outside first, the situation is one
in which the efforts by students to act politically on a national scale
were in a sense defeated. The actual involvement of students in politics
in the November election quite often resulted in getting the vote out,
but then the voters would vote for the wrong man (which is discouraging
for a new worker in the field of politics); the political situation wasn't
one which lent itself to the wishes and ambitions of students to gain
more political importance.

"On the campuses, I think two things have happened: the students
have seen more clearly the direct relationship between educational and
social reform, and being activists, they wish to work at particular projects,
which students have tried out in one place or another. This is more
absorbing to them and more satisfying than either the demonstrations
and protest which, after all, is merely a limited social instrument for
achieving limited objectives. You can't keep on demonstrating-it loses
any effectiveness which it can have as rhetorical theatre— because the
people have seen the act before. And people are not responding to
demonstrations in the same way that they used to when it was more
of a novelty, and more a demonstration of the excitement of students
and their wish to improve the society. I think the energy then, has been
diverted into practical educational reform projects and away from stan-
dard techniques of dissent and demonstration, either on war or on educa-
tional programs."

dr. george roche:

"I suspect that the change which has occurred on the
college campuses within the past year— and it is a very
marked change, obviously— centers on the fact that the
students have begun to perceive that there's a difference
between power and authority. The rhetoric of as recently
as one year ago assumed 'all power to the people,' mean-
ing the students, that the university was a power center
which could be taken over, and that power could be used
to have certain reforming changes within society. Well,
this hasn't worked out that way at ail because the uni-
versity in fact never possessed that kind of power. The
only thing that the university has been successfully able
to project in the long run is a kind of authority. If you
need to spank a child, that's the exercise of power. But,
if in fact, you're able to handle him without doing that,
because he respects you, because he lends credence to
what you're telling him— that's authority. The universities
at one time had that authority, but students mistook it
for power, and now they discover that neither power nor
authority exist in the present disjointed, confused, poii-
ticalized academic community."

dr. Clark kerr:

"Let me say . . . two reasons which I don't think
fit. One is that students have been used by ideolo-
gues in the past. My contact with students indi-
cates that they usually know what they're doing,
that the problems of May a year ago were kind
of welled-up in thousands and almost nlillions of
students; they weren't being misled by some peo-
ple for ulterior purposes. I don't think students
can be used, very many of them, for very long.
So I don't agree with that solution. Second, I don't
think we have less trouble this year because stu-
dents are any less alienated, or any less dissatis-
fied. We still have the same problems around— of
Vietnam, of poverty, of racial discrimination— and
my feeling, if anything, is that the students are
perhaps even more dissatisfied with certain things
than they were one year ago. So, you can't say
that all of a sudden, dissatisfaction and disaffec-
tion disappeared.

"My answers would be this: first of all, if you
look at the whole history of student movements,
they've been very volatile. They go to high peaks
and they drop down into low valleys. Last year
was a high peak; this year is a low valley. I don't
think that you can draw too much either from the
peak (that it's leading to revolution) or a valley
(that you're going back to the '50s and the apa-
thetic generation). One of the reasons I think we
have this valley Is that a lot of people did get turned
off by a lot of the violence which occurred last
year, and summer. I also think that there is some
additional sophistication by students as to how
you really can approach the public and get con-
structive results and also how much they are will-

^^^^P ^ ^

Hft^f ■

mtw

^P^'f >^'' ^

^^n^^

! 1 L*

^^^HI^^^^^^H^^^^^I

ing to accomplish. You can pledge yourself in May
to work for elections in November, and when No-
vember comes along, you're doing something
completely different.

"If anyone is reaching the conclusion that just
because there hasn't been any trouble this year,
that there never would be again— I think they're
absolutely wrong. I think the conditions are there
of dissatisfaction and disaffection, so that it could
break out again if there is sufficient provocation.
I just personally hope that the problems now facing
America get solved quickly enough and well
enough so that it doesn't break out again. But so
long as this nation faces the major problems which
are now unsolved, I think we have to expect, from
time to time, there will be major waves of student
dissent and even student disruption."

/ PACE 25

^"^^

■t^

«"S

mayor carl stokes:

"I happen not to be mayor of a black city. It's
a white city. There's 63% of Y^^i people there
(turned that one around, huh?) Now, this is signifi-
cant because the only way that it could be done
was obviously by some kind of coalition. If there
were only 35% black people there, Americans think
that only white people vote for white people and
black people vote for black people— I couldn't have
gotten elected— right? So what we did was, we put
together the black minority, we put Puerto Rican,
we put the poor white and then we put together
the fair-minded middle class and— I don't want to
call him a liberal— just the fair-minded guy. It hap-
pened that each time I'd run, I'd run against a
slob. So my campaigns didn't test whether you
were liberal or not— they just tested whether you
had good sense or not . . .

". . . I've always understood about white people
who hate black people, and I've always understood
the game the aristocracy of the South played
against the white Southerner and the black South-
erner. He put them at one another's necks while
he exploited both of them. So I understood that
class exploitation. But do you know that I have
never really understood that middle-class black
people did not like lower-economic black people?
I never got any more hate from any group of people
against me in Cleveland than when I moved low
income black people into middle-income black
neighborhoods. And let me tell you the kinds of
reasons that they raised to me as to why I should
not do this. In the first place they would say, 'Now
we're all black, so you know that we don't have
anything against these people, Stokes. But, it
would overcrowd our schools. They have a lot of
children. They have not had the opportunity to be
prepared well, so it would lower the quality of our
schools. The large number of people that would
move in with these families would put an extra
load on the sewers and the children would pose
traffic hazards and overall they would contribute
to the crime and delinquency rate of the commu-
nity. And, finally, it's just the fact that when you
get poor people in your neighborhood, it affects
your property values!' That was a hell of an educa-
tive experience for me . . ."

michael harrington:

"We have to begin to think socially. I suggest to you-but
this is a piece of wisdom that does not require you to become
a socialist to understand-the invisible hand of Adam Smith
will not save our cities or our civilization. Our brains will do
it if we can spend the quantities of money with some kmd
of qualitative intelligence to deal with the problem of housing
that is destroying the cities, is locking the poor up in them
and is destroying not only the lives of the poor but, I tell
you, is destroying the lives of every one of us in this society,
if we lock poor people and black people and Chicanes up
in cities, then those of us who are white and affluent are also
jailers. And that's intolerable."

dr. edward
banfield: ,

"We're not arguing about whether
some people are poorer than
others— or whether poverty is de-
sirable. The crucial fact of the mat-
ter is that we live in an enormously
productive economic order, it's
unbelievable how much it pro-
duces and how at compound inter-
est, so to spealt, its productivity
increases despite the stupidities of
the way we run things. When you're
talking about poverty you're not
looking forward twenty or thirty
years-you're looking back twenty
or thirty years. The problems are
essentially not ones of getting the
material requirements of a good
life-the problems are of inculcat-
ing the standards and values and
tastes and ways of life that will
make a good life for those who
have the material requirements.
And that Is infinitely more difficult."

daniel p.
moynihan:

"You can't solve the problem of life,
of love, of humanity— everybody dies
sooner or later, which is kind of aw-
ful—these things won't go away. But
poverty can. We ought to be clear. M ike
Harrington and i were together in those
days when we drafted the poverty bill
(the OEO bill in 1964), and i think we
^.^^^ had a fairly clear idea: among other

^^ things we were defining a problem

which included everybody. One of the
nice things about the word "poverty"
is that it includes whites as well as
blacks and they're together ... I would
disagree with one point (made Carl
Stokes)— that the people don't starve
quietly— people do starve quietly.
They've been starving quietly out there
in the boondocks of the South for the
^^- last 100 years. The only consolation
they've got out of their politicians has
been a certain kind of ugly racism that
meant you may t>e as poor as a man
could be, but somehow you could
^ always be better than someisody else
just because your neck was red and
his neck was black . . .

. . we're talking about this problem
of evolution or revolution— you've got
to understand, this is not something
you'd like me to say to you. I can tell
you that I really know how to stand on
my head and make you feel wondertui
about how wonderful we ail are and
how we're going to go out there and
change that roffen system and smash
the state! You're not! You're going to
go out, and get married, and have kids,
^a^m^tam ^"^ wonder how'd it happen so fast?"

dr. benjamin rogge:

"This discussion tonight could have gone in any number of directions.
The city is a multi-faceted operation and set of problems. We could
have moved in that directlon-we could have talked about crime-
there are any number of directions. We talked a great deal about
poverty. We have solved no problems for once and for all. I think
what we have demonstrated here, though, is the kind of process that
gives us hope for the American society, and that is the process of
rational discourse. It is this kind of rhetoric that gives hope for the
long run survival, the long run viability of this society of ours."

Saturday, april 24th
/ george mcgovern

"At this point, the counter-culture,
or the youth culture, is probably the
most potent single force in Ameri-
can political life. I don't say it's the
only force, but I think it's the most
innovative and dynamic force
that's now operating in American
politics. That doesn't mean that the
young people are going to decide
the next President of the United
States, but it does mean that their
values, their questioning of the war
policy, their deep concern about
the destruction of the environment,
their greater sensitivity to the
problems of hunger and injustice
and poverty, their tendency to
question materialism as over
against the quality of life, the spir-
itual values of life— all of those
things will exert a very important
role over the next decade. And I
think they're more closely asso-
ciated with young people, perhaps,
than they are with the older gener-
ation, although there are many
older people who are very sensitive
to those same values.

"I read Mr. Reich's book, The
Greening of America, from cover
to cover; I didn't agree with all of
his observations, but I kept thin-
king as I read that book, when he
talks about the importance of lov-
ing one another— and of reverence
for bureaucracy and the demands
of our material society, and trying
to go beyond that to concern about
our fellow humans— I kept thinking
that's what I learned in Sunday
school and what I learned from my
mother and father. I think it's sort
of New Testament doctrine. It was
not too suprising, when I got to the
third or fourth page from the end
of that book, that Charles Reich
said what I'd been trying to say
here: We really need to live the
Judeo-Christian ethic. We really
need to apply the gospel of broth-
erhood and love for our fellow
humans, and I believe in that. I
think that's what we need to do."

PAGE 28 /

/ PACE 29

Whenever McAlister Auditorium is packed to capac-
ity for four consecutive days, tiie particular event
that drew those crowds must be considered a suc-
cess. And indeed, Direction '71 was viewed by most
who participated as the most highly stimulating,
interesting, successful program since Direction's
beginnings four years ago.

The institution of the Direction "Living Room'
enabled many interested students and faculty
members to delve further into the distinguished
minds of the Direction speakers on a head-to-head
basis. The forum-style presentations in McAlister
brought to light differing opinions of speakers, and
provided a more thought-provoking discussion than
past Direction speeches offered. And, of course, the
themes of the sessions were relevant and diverse
enough to attract listeners from all corners of the
University.

Nevertheless, as with everything done by mere
mortals. Direction 71 was far from perfect, as critics
have been quick to point out. Several major criti-
cisms center on the choice of speakers. Margaret
Blain, former Hullabaloo editor and well-known
anti-sexist, said in speaking for these critics, "1
refuse to believe that there is not a woman in the
country who is fit to sit on a platform with George
Roche." The absence of any speaker on the pro-
gram who could be classified as "radical" also pro-
voked some comment. ("Can you imagine watching
Abbie Hoffman and William Buckley fight it out on
the stage of McAlister?" Miss Blain quipped.) And,
indeed the presence of these interesting people on
future Direction panels may indeed result in a good
time for all. But is this what Direction is for?

Perhaps it is the title "Direction" that holds the
answer. These programs are designed to stimulate
our thought, to get us aroused, to get us worried,
to get us concerned, to give us direction. Then,
hopefully, we will take it upon ourselves to actually
go out and put to use the ideas that have been
tunneled into our heads.

—Rick Streiffer

A & S '73

/ PAGE 31

The death of Dean John W. Lawrence brought to an
early and untimely end the life of a man who applied the
elements of reason and compassion to the practice of the
profession of architecture, who taught and transmitted
these same values to his students and contemporaries,
and who strove to impress them upon those public officials
to whom he so often addressed himself. John Lawrence
was an eloquent man, an eloquent thinker and writer, and
a profound observer and analyst of the environment by
which he was surrounded.

I know of no other man who could feel as deeply and
as personally as John Lawrence. His affection for the
persons and objects he loved knew no bounds; the disap-
pointment that overtook him when his trust and affection
were violated was equally great. Problems of an infinite
variety became his concern and all were treated with the
depth of feeling that set John Lawrence's abilities, as an
architect, teacher, dean, and keen observer of the plight
of man in the city, above those of all his fellow men.

The amorphous object for which he perhaps held the
most affection was the city of New Orleans itself. From
the innumerable hours I spent in the presence of Dean
Lawrence, it was obvious that his love for this city was
incalculable. He rejoiced in the city's cultural and ethnic
variety, its scale and proportion, its pace and way of life,
its history and its river. He was also deeply hurt and ou-
traged by the destruction wrought upon it by carelessly
planned expressways, by incessant economic exploitation
of the Vieux Carre, by the vulgarity of unplanned and
unsympathetic suburban development, by the lack of con-
cern for rectifying the terrible state of New Orleans hous-
ing, by the continued non-recognition of any means of
transport save the automobile, by the pursuit of a ques-
tionable "progress" at the expense of the city's true mean-
ing and reason for existence. John Lawrence's cry— for
creating a sane and livable urban environment, for pre-
serving and rehabilitating those elements of it that can
be saved, and in all cases for striving for quality and
excellence— was at many times a lonely cry. Yet his positive
influence has been successful in many instances; unfortu-
nately, it has been ignored in many more.

The School of Architecture, of which he was dean, was
another beneficiary of John Lawrence's affection. As a

John W.
Lawrence

1923-1971

The Man

and
His Region

student in that school I have felt that affection very per-
sonally. The philosophy Dean Lawrence had for the School
of Architecture, and for all higher education, was to cul-
tivate feelings and emotions within the student that would
make him capable of understanding and of developing
empathy for the problems that confront us all. At the Tulane
Summer Conference in July, 1970, Dean Lawrence made
a beautiful response to the question of "What are Tulane's
priorities in goals and functions?" He said the goal of the
University should be the "development of sensitive people
by (1) education and (2) the transmittal of learning, includ-
ing new learning." He spoke to the need for instilling "a
strong ingredient of compassion" within all people. Dean
Lawrence had those qualities within himself, and he
showed them in all endeavors that he undertook. He con-
stantly strove to understand his students, and if at times
he failed, it was not because he was lacking in concern,
but because of the genuine differences in men. Never-
theless, the time he devoted to students and the concern
he had for their welfare provide ample evidence to show
that he was a truly sensitive and responsive teacher and
human being.

My own life has been very much enriched by my friend-
ship with Dean Lawrence: his counsel and advice, his
example, and his inspiration strengthened me no less than
they strengthened others. He pointed to a better way of
life and he taught how it could be achieved. His death
left us with a challenge to continue the teaching.

Ralph Wafer, June 1971

Editor's note:

On the following pages is the text of a paper, entitled
"The Face of the Region," presented by Dean John W.
Lawrence to the Goals Foundation Council task force for
Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard Parishes on January
9, 1971. The paper is a broad and all-encompassing state-
ment by Dean Lawrence regarding his impressions of peo-
ple's attitudes in the New Orleans region and his feelings
about the direction of the region's future. What Dean
Lawrence says in the paper shows well the depth of con-
cern and the love he held for this region.

THE FACE OF THE REGION

It is taken for granted that one
cannot be entirely objective about
some one or some thing he loves.
I cannot, therefore, claim
objectivity as I try to share with
you some of my views and
impressions of a city, and its
environs, which was my birth-place
and which has alternately
nourished and offended me for
most of my adult life.
Also heavily subscribed to is the
notion that we hurt the ones we
love— out of a distorted emotional
concern for their welfare. My
remarks shall certainly not be
without emotion, but I hope will
not hurt. They are not intended to
do so.

What follows is a highly personal
portrait. It is best that way, I think.
Another, or an infinity of others,
with different backgrounds, values
and vantage points, would have as
many different portraits, even
totally opposite. I have purposely
avoided a statistical approach— for
one reason, that I am not a
statistician— and for another, they
can be most unreliable and indeed
deceptive indications of reality.
When Gross National Product, for
example, counts the tearing down
of good old buildings as a plus in
the same way that it counts the
building of bad new ones, or when
armaments production has the
same value as education or
housing or health, we see how
inadequate such devices really
are. Gross National Product or
Gross Regional Product can tell us
only that we may be doing a lot of
things, but it can tell us nothing
about whether we are doing the
right things. Reality is too
meta-physical for statistics.

Is there an identifiable Region
about which we are speaking
today? I think there is. We are
talking about a metropolitan area
of somewhat over a million people
(a third of the state's people)
which under the protocols of the
Regional Planning Commission
encompasses Orleans, Jefferson
and St. Bernard Parishes. The
Commission itself recognizes that
it is incomplete without St.
Tammany Parish. But that can be
remedied.

It is a region whose geography is
dominated by one of the world's
great rivers and a remarkable
collection of lakes and streams,
natural beauty and more than its
share of nature's abundance. The
family arguments now taking place
in our regional house disclose, if
nothing else, that political

boundaries and the governments
described by them are inherently
incapable of dealing with issues of
geographic and cultural regional
significance. These boundaries are
wholly artificial— historical
accidents— and increasingly
operate against regional integrity.
The issues with which we must
deal today have nothing to do with
these kinds of boundaries.

The region has many faces and
there are many components in a
description of its anatomy: the
land, our natural assets (and
liabilities) the man-built
environment and its cooperation or
lack of same with nature, our
institutions (education, health,
religious, recreational, business,
cultural, etc.), but most of all the
region is its people, with their
attitudes, traditions, aspirations
and inspirations— Garden District
blue-bloods and trappers, aspiring
Garden District blue-bloods and
gentlemen hunters, half-black, half
white, down and out aristocrats
and nouveau riche— what a
splendid mix! Who would want to
change it? Our ethnic richness,
with all the inputs it invites, is one
of our greatest assets. The
composite is unique, and it is on
this we must build.

This is not to say that all is well
with our people. Far from it.

If I were reduced to choosing only
one word to describe our people, I
believe it would be tolerant.
Squares and hippies tolerate each
other better than in most places.
Although it may be an historical
accident, we are the most
geographically racially integrated
city in the united States of
America. 1 shall have more to say
about this later.

But tolerance can have its abuses,
and for us it is most apparent in
that we have lost our capacity for
outrage. And I have in mind
especially our capacity to be
outraged by low levels of
governmental performance and the
sheer callousness of some
officialdom. It is not cause for
concern that a man prominent in
government remains a major
legislative spokesman for an
industry from which he earns more
than a quarter of a million dollars
a year? Or again another, who is
supposed to be "like us" in
conservative outlook, whose
political career has been built
upon the fight against "creeping
socialism" but who has been
earning more than a hundred
thousand dollars a year for not
planting cotton? One wonders who

are the creeps and who are the

socialists?

Who can fail to wince when one
sees lobbyists pressing legislators'
voting buttons in our state
legislature, or, despite the
ingredients of comedy, a state
official passing out candy and
campaign buttons at a most
unpropitious moment?
It is not a question of law-breaking
so much as the monumental
insensitivity which wounds us
more, I think, than we sometimes
realize. Public officials are the
curators of our public dignity and
we must stop having our dignity
abused by them. We need not be
a humorless people in demanding
an end to it. Certainly these are
the kinds of things which Patrick
Moynihan had in mind when
recently upon taking leave of the
President's cabinet he said, "What
was once primarily a disdain for
government has developed into a
genuine mistrust". Our government
must appear to be trustworthy
before it can be. It is, after all, the
only instrument for the orderly
improvement of our social and
cultural welfare, and the key to
what is called quality of life.

Closer to home there is a war
going on. (I am not talking about
the longest and second largest
war in our history, and the only
one not engaged in according to
constitutional prescription.) I am
talking about the war between
Jefferson Parish and the City of
New Orleans. The bridge
controversy is merely a skirmish in
the larger war— a mere footnote on
the whole story.

At the moment, Jefferson Parish
can flourish or appear to prosper
only at the expense of New
Orleans. The lure of no taxes is
irresistible. What will happen, of
course, and is happening, is that
the racial balance in New Orleans,
one of our greatest assets, will be
destroyed and become irreversible
about the time Jefferson Parish
taxes must inevitably become
competitive. But the damage will
have been done. And God help us
if this region becomes what so
many in the north have become— a
white doughnut with a black
center!

There is a certain organic quality
about our region. You can't find
Los Angeles, even with its twelve
million people. But here, there is a
strong, identifiable center which of
course is the historic City of New
Orleans. The suburban parishes'
fate is inexorably linked to that of
New Orleans and if New Orleans

goes down so will they.
There must be an end to petty
parochial jealousies and offenses
taken for alleged affronts.
Consider these issues:
A virtually bankrupt City of New
Orleans pays to the state seven
times as much in property taxes as
Jefferson Parish. That's bad
enough. But Jefferson Parish gets
back from the state five times as
much as New Orleans! (Relying on
my memory, my numbers may not
be exact.) Now I ask you, who can
believe in government like that?
One can only hope that the City's
suit for redressing this patent
injustice will be successful. What it
amounts to is that the people of
New Orleans are paying the taxes
of the people in Jefferson Parish.

But when the Mayor of New
Orleans proposed that a tax be
levied on those who sleep in
suburbs but make their living in
New Orleans and use its services,
and that the suburban parishes
have a similar and reciprocal tax,
the same spiteful legislative
paraphernalia which kept Urban
renewal out of this city for twenty
years went into high gear.

And then there is the mess about
property assessments. Here each
parish has its own version of an
intolerable situation. By high
mimillage and low assessments,
Jefferson Qarish exacts more than
its rightful share of revenue from
the rest of the state, including New
Orleans. In New Orleans it is more
a matter of inequality of
assessments. The matter has been
talked to death.

It is a problem of state-wide
porportion— assessors brazenly
ignoring the law they swear to

uphold. (Incidentally, how's that
for another side of the law and
order issue?) It will be settled in
the courts, and soon, we can
hope— though not perhaps without
constant and continuing public
exposure. In the meantime, cracks
are showing up in the no-tax,
low-tax paradise, and without
regional equality in taxation, will
recur with greater frequency and
be more serious in nature.

This all suggests to me that
without effective and cooperative
metropolitan government, the
problems will get worse. New
Orleans, Jefferson, St. Bernard
and St. Tammany comprise a
metropolitan whole, and to repeat,
prosperity of one part at the
expense of another, can only be
transient. The kinds of problems
which exist today— in
transportation, housing, racial
distribution, pollution and
environmental harmony— cannot be
solved within arbitrary lines or
maps.

One face of the region is its

physical face. An interstate
highway roars through our center,
trampling on a stable
neighborhood of houses and
shops and businesses. In the
process, we destroyed what was
perhaps the most beautiful grove
of oak trees in Urban America— an
irreplaceable luxury. We must
never let this happen again. We
seem to have developed
something of a specialty for
removing trees. Not only are trees
beautiful, providing shape and
texture and color and shade, but
they are necessary to the
sustaining of life, since they are
very much involved with the
oxygen-carbon-dioxide equilibrium.

Our sub-division planning has
been very poor, removing mature
trees by the thousands— making a
desert of an oasis— and replacing
a few of them with nursery
saplings. I know that you can't fill
low land around trees and have
them survive, but I also know that
sub-divisions can be planned in
such a way as to preserve clumps
and groves. And who says all
houses must be on slabs which in
turn rest on fill? Working with the
land and its natural features can
give us something that other
envy— the potential enriching of an
indigenous architectural tradition.

And speaking of tradition, how sad
it is to see it perverted by shutters
nailed on the wall, by patronizing
scraps of ironwork and by
mini-versions of plantation houses.
There are obscenities other than
the four-letter kind. We must face
up to the fact that there has been
an appallingly low level of public
taste operative in our area. This
can best be changed by a new
commitment to quality— and the
logical place to start is in public
building. The design of a public
building should not be a prize for
a faithful or politically helpful
friend, but should follow after a
most careful consideration of the
talent and other resources
available. And this city has greatly
neglected some of its best talent.
It would be very much a step in
the right direction if each division
of government would publish
explicitly how it hires architects
and engineers, for example.

No civilization in all history has
created such ugliness as we see
on a drive from the airport to the
center of New Orleans. Weeds,
shells, trash, terrible buildings and
thousands of worse signs. It must
surely cause a visitor to wonder if
this is indeed a city which forgot
to care. But what does it do to us?
We die a little every time we pass
through it— numbed though we
have been to this assault on our
senses. By contrast, the more
recent efforts to beautify some of
the major boulevards in Jefferson
Parish is a very hopeful
development.

In Eastern New Orleans, there is a
road proposed which is
dangerously close to two historic
Indian mounds. There is still time
to make a regional asset of these.

The presence of the past is a
priceless advantage. Man cannot
live only with an ever-fleeting
present and an unknown future.
Visible remnants of our past are

necessary to see what and where
we have been. It is necessary for
our sanity. The Vieux Carre is the
region's best known and its most
important man-made artifact. It is
as important for its description of
a vital style of urban living as it is
for its historical significance, yet
we blandly go on building stage
sets, caricatures of reality. Our
capacity for editing history seems
boundless. Neither philosophical,
artistic nor historical impulses are
served in the process. As
Professor Bermard Lemann has
observed, "flaccid historicism is
worse than other forms of
dustruction".

But the Vieux Carre and the
Garden District are not all we have
in the way of rich environmental
fabric. Neighborhood after
neighborhood as catalogued
throughout the city by Professor
Lemann have unique stores of
vernacular architecture. Moreover,
these are places where people
want to live.

The entire community must find
ways to re-habilitate these houses
where necessary and to make
them once again joyful places for
black and white. It cannot be done
without the help of government
and the financial community. In
Pittsburgh, banks have set aside a
certain percentage of their
reserves for these purposes with
remarkable results. Why can't we
do the same?

A community in which more than
40% of the houses are dilapidated
or otherwise sub-standard is in
deep trouble. Some few voices
have been trying to alert us to this
growing problem for a long time.
The cost of housing is rising to the
point where only one-fourth of the
American public can now afford

the median house cost of $26,000.
The housing crisis is spreading
rapidly to the middle class. This is
one reason why we must look as
much to renewal as to new
construction. And through renewal
we retain a city with depth and
historical dimension.

I am placing much hope in the
Mayor's just announced plan to
give the housing situation a whole
new look. The other parishes of
the region should be joined in this
enterprise, for like most everything
else, housing is a metropolitan
matter and not merely a New
Orleans problem. And it cannot be
solved by the professional
bureaucracy alone.

We must reclaim our river for
much more public use. The lake
must be cleaned up. Let's make
Canal Street beautiful. We can
start with trees and paint, taking
off in the process, some of the
instant architecture that's masking
facades of character and
distinction. A woman with beautiful
hair doesn't wear wigs. Of course,
most of the signs must go, or
we're wasting our time. We have a
hang-up about signs in this city.
We even came in for prominent
inclusion in a famous book on
environmental atrocities.

I have not mentioned the port, but
quite obviously, it is our most
important economic asset and a
source of historical pride. It
reminds us of why we are here.
Others can particularize better
than I can.

Now is it all bad?

Of course not.

If it were, why would I or any of us
be here? What's wrong can be
remedied, if we will it to be, and
what's right can be made better.

I was struck the other day when
three former students visited the
School on a Christmas holiday.
Highly sophisticated young men,
one is working as an architect in
Amsterdam, another as a VISTA
volunteer in New Hampshire, and
the third is a graduate student at
UCLA. If there wasn't something
good for them about New Orleans,
they wouldn't have been here.
They lived here long enough to
know the city and came to
appreciate its qualities enough to
come again. There are many
others like them.

What is the source of this appeal?
If it were easily described it
wouldn't be worth having; and to
describe it adequately is more than
I can do. We can be sure it is
compounded of the excitement of
a great port, beautiful treed
streets, layers of sophistication
and naivete, a sense of place and
identity, a civilized pace, charming
neighborhoods which offer hope
that the suburban antiseptic is not
the only option, and perhaps it is
even enriched on occasion by our
colorful and pragmatic politics. Of
one thing we can be certain— it is
not based upon bigness. San
Francisco is rejoicing because it
has slipped from California's
second to its fourth city in size.
Venice is not large but the world
comes to its door. The modest
Mediterranean cities of Aries,
Aix-en-Provence and Antibes are
highly civilized places.
Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami
need not be our models. They are
one thing, we another. If we set as
our goal the making of a city
which we want to live in— a decent
and civilized place— and are willing
to pay for it with money,
imagination and energy, there will
be no shortage of tourists.

Cities' roles change in history. A
narrow preservationist aloofness
which fails to comprehend the
dynamics of contemporary life will
not do. Nor will the speculator who
thinks the problem is to satisfy
intricate government regulations
instead of human needs do
anything but harm. A sense of
wholeness is needed by all. and
along with it an uncompromising
subscription to quality.

From this alone, miracles can
happen.

John W. Lawrence, FAIA

Professor of Architecture and
Dean, Sctiool of Architecture,
Tulane university

9 January 1971

PACE 36 /

Alpha Omega Alpha: Richard Thomas Anderson, Thomas Brandt Anderson, Laurence Warren Arend, James
Stewart Bonnet, Jr., Isaac William Browder, Archie Watt Brown, Jr., Ronald Wilfred Busuttil. Benita Synar
Carson, Stanley David Carson, Joseph Alan Chiapella, Harriette Anne Clay, Clifford Loren Coleman. David
Michael Jarrott, Robert Joseph Kaminski, Glenn Earl Lambert, Jr., Douglas Mann Landwehr, Robert Alar
Lipson, Charles Gordon Long, Jack Colbert Morgan, III, Arthur Joseph Nussbaum, William Ellis O'Mara
John Edward Rea, III, Robert Edward Roybal, and Andrea Lynn Starrett. Alpha Sigma Lambda: Richard
P. Berry, Alma Blasini, Barbara Bouden, Karen Jahncke, Frank A, Jones, Jr., George W. MacArthur, John
E. May, Ronald J. Ragas, Jack W. Randolph, and Betty Russell. Assets: Martha Azar. Irene Briede, Mary
Carrigan, Mimsy Fitzpatrick, Karen Meador, Paula Perrone, Kay Sampson, Diane Sanderson, Sheelah Strong,
and Louise Wolf. Beta Gamma Sigma: Jerome T. Broussard, John M. Caldwell, Maj. Joseph C. Conrad,
Maj. Merle Freitag, Maj. Noel D. Gregg, Maj. Jack H. Griffith, Jr., Maj. John C. House, Johnnie M. Jackson,
Jr., Paul F, Livaudais, David J. Manifold, George A. McCammon, Capt. James F. Mullen, Capt. Walter L.
Perry, Maj. John L. Rafferty, Jackson S. Robbins, Ashton J. Ryan, Jr., Capt. Melvin E. Schick, Jr., Richard
L. Simmons, Gerardo ten Brink, and Capt. Jay E. Vaughn. Kappa Delta Phi: Andrew W. Allen. Bruce Feingerts
John McCarron, Jr., George Nelson, Jr., Robert B. Schwartz, Leon M. Trice, Eric William Vetter, and Ralph
E. Wafer. Mortar Board: Margaret Blain, Claudette Campbell, Shelley Dorfman, Muffet Fonte, Lynn Freeman,
Sandra Hartley, Laurel Malowney, Jill Myers, Pat Prins, Cynthia Stevens, Anna Wade, Juanita Weisbach.
and Jane Zimmerman. Omicron Delta Kappa: Leiand P. Bennett, Gregory Bertucci, Richard H. Bretz, Jr..
Floyd A. Buras, Jr., Alvin James Cox, Michael B. Farnell, Bruce L. Feingerts, Edmond G. Feuille, Jr., James
B. Florey, Stephen M. Henry, Jac D. Irvine, John Kuypers, Keith D. LaRose, Sidney G. Marlow, Jr., Claude

A. Mason, John D. McCarron, Jr., George D. Nelson, Jr., Sidney H. Phillips, Jr., Lehman K. Preis, Jr., Mark

B. Steepler, Robert H. Thomas, Thomas W. Twiford, John H. Walsh, Robert A. Warriner, III, Robert V. Wiggins,
Wayne S. Woody, and Alan J. Yesner. Order of the Coif: William Edward Brown. Robert Reisch Casey,
Anita Hamann Ganucheau, David Arthur Kerstein, Geoffrey Herr Longenecker, David Anthony Marcello,
Malcolm Andrew Meyer, Joseph Leon Parkinson, Lyie Robert Philipson, Donald Alan Shindler, Judy Nicholas
Tabb, and Walter Chillingworth Thompson. Jr. Phi Beta Kappa: Randall Kirk Albers, Charles William Allen,
Jr., John William Audick, James Daly Austin, Joseph Edward Baggett, Thomas Donald Barton. Nancy Dale

/ PACE 3'i

Berk, Sidney Joseph Bertucci, Charles Walter Brown, Diane Burnside, Sheliey Lee Citron, Susan Faye Clade,
William Henry Cummings, III, James Gardner Dalferes, Shelley Fonda Dorfman, Nell Ann Duncan, Harris
Gregory Effron, Alton Lynn Ellison, Jr., Steven Bruce Feder, Steven Allen Felsenthal, James Henry Fife,
Sharon Leslie Flashman, Katharine Fraser, Carol Ann Freeman, Lynn Foster Freeman, Jacqueline Friedman,
James Rufus Garts, Jr., Ted Wayne Gay, Raymond Phillip Gordon, Dennis Gerard Gregoire, Jay Eduard
Gruber, Barbara Bolton Hall, Patricia Doran Hanks, Virginia Harris, Stephen Michael Henry, Rose Marie
Hom, Richard Povi^ell Hoover, Martha Igert, Margaret Lamb Johnson, Julie Diann Kampen, Dennis Kasimian,
May Kay, Monty Krieger, Lee Hamilton Latimer, Richard Dana Lester, John Graham McCarron, Jr., Mary
Jane McClintock, Michael Kenneth McClure, Clyde William McCurdy, Jr., Mary Edie Meredith, Gayle Louise
Monroe, Deborah Gail Morris, Edward James Moskowitz, lleana C. Oroza, Arthur Franklin Paulina, Harriet
Louise Porzig, James Piercey Price, Jo D. Bounds Reed, Eleanor Conway Siley, James Michael Riopelle,
William Alan Robinson, Louis James Rovelli, Charles Sanford Ruark, Jr., Robert Edward Ruderman, William
Terrence Schreier, Sarah Culbertson Scott, Charles Marshall Sevadjian, Tamra Sindler, Shari Dianne Sobel,
Martha Jane Stein, Cynthia Ann Stevens, Dennis Ronald Stewart, Mark Benjamin Stoopler, Rose Marie
Smith Strain, Justin Tally, Katherine Ann Templeton, Dorothy Carroll Toby, Cristine Marie Traxler, Stephen
Vann, Russell Moreland Weaver, Alison Weinberg, Riki Pauline Weinstein, Henri Wolbrette, III, and Martha
Jane Zimmerman. Tau Beta Pi: Ashton Benjamin Avegno, Jr., Jeb Stuart Baumann, Lionel Michael Cobo,
Jack Carl Detweiler, Richard Charles Dusang, Hugh Henry Fuller, III, Daniel Paul Garcia, Michael Francis
Hein, Michael Allan Knapp, Robert Joseph L'Hoste, Jr., Hugh Joseph McClain, Jr., Stephen Anthony Murphy,
Helen Corinne Pattison, Ted Steven Silver, Philip Nathan Styne, James Clark Tudor, and Thomas William
Twiford, Jr. Who's Who: David Bauman, Bill Behrenett, Marcia Bennett, Nancy Berk, Margaret Blain, Claudette
Campbell, Sharon Carrigan, Claude Clayton, Mark Davis, Kenneth Ducote, Clark Durant, Mike Farnell, Bruce
Feingerts, Sharon Flashman, Mike Florie, Muffet Fonte, Cory Frantz, Barbara Hall, Sandra Hartley, Mike
Henry, Mac Hyman, Jim Koontz, John Laborde, Lucy Lane, Chuck Leaness, Richard Lester, Sallie Lowenstein,
Irwin Mandelkern, Randy Marcus, Jill Meyers, John Mueller, George Nelson, lleana Oroza, Rusty Palmer,
Pat Prins, Charles Redmond, Kenneth Sanderson, Terry Schreier, Dick Sharpstein, Marian Shostrum, Shari
Sobel, Cynthia Stevens, Mike Stropler, Robert Thomas, Lee Trice, Thomas Twiford, Jr., Anna Wade, Michael
Wall, Gordon Weil, Riki Weinstein, Alice Wilbert, Carolyn Woosley, Stephen Zagor, and Jane Zimmerman.

PAGE 38 /

f^JZm^IL..Zm^^

jj^

!«r* «r" :^

'1 BBi

'j,rc"

t ^ — ■

■

"*^

ti^

ih^rfirrrrrii

w^-'-"***^^"

^H m -_i-» ^E

■■»ii»-""

Qnd ikfw

Nowadays, peace is "in" with pot, tine war is "out" with Weejuns,
Pony tails have parted and the letter sweater moved
to other styles and fashions that symbolized the sixties
and show the changing mood of the student generation.

Psychedelic light shows, sounds and high pitched screeches
reflect a different tempo from the fifties.
Protocol has bowed to bodies, beads and bells,
as we enter a new era of expression.

The media is serving to integrate the nation
and provide identity for groups that were apart;
students were scattered in fifty different states,
then politics and protest were presented.

Begun at Berkeley and explosively contagious,

like a chain reaction, violence was in vogue,

and riot raged the campus over civil rights and ROTC,

Til understanding rifted way past all repair.

Some marched to save the movement

and indeed, it is significant that peace is sought instead of war

and love instead of hate;
but can we weld the worlds of workers and our parents
when opinions of the young and old are opposite?

We vocalize our views out of interest and involvement:
Galley and Cambodia are objects of concern.

Students speed, but not with Spiro and are scared by our technology-
IBM computer cards, gigantic corporations threaten
individuality we've been trying to retain.

The youngest generation to take an active part

because higher education has given us an insight to the workings

of the world.
And we are taught to question and investigate the unknown
so that progress can occur.

We are concerned with the quality of country

and are seeking sets of values somewhat different from before.

Some have withdrawn to water beds and farms

along a hippie frontier of new freedoms.

And whether we are like this is a purely private issue
but at least we are aware of the trends taking hold
for through communications college has expanded beyond
beyond the quad of Newcomb and New Orleans.

The campus is a meeting ground for many varied types,
and here we learn to tolerate the others.
Each is exposed to what she never knew,
comprising the microcosm of experience.

Here we've had a healthy mix of

debutantes and activists, followers, and senate leaders,

model types and blue jeans joiners, intellectuals and the jet set,

mesh their tones and temperaments together.

White crosses on the quad to commemorate the dead,
Panty raids and football games, doughnuts in the dorm,
Pass-fail through petition, still parties with the Dean,
make for motley memories of the changing college scene.

But with all this talk of demonstrations, one must not forget
that students can cooperate and through committees settle
issues that have brought our peers
to the brink of revolution.

Newcomb has given us the chance to participate
in the decision-making process of the college,
and our administration has tried to be responsive
to student sensitivity and gripes.

On the levee by the River, jazz and Bourbon Street,
Basin blues, red beans and rice, Creoles, Cajuns, shrimp,
are vestiges of culture in crescent city history
of which we could partake.

Artichokes and white magnolias, oaks and muffelattas,

Lake Ponchartrain, the Park, the streetcar on St. Charles,

and Mardi Gras to gather beads, say, throw me something mister,

will remind us of this four-year Delta setting.

This is a rather peaceful place
where there are traces of tradition
to allow a quiet gentleness
the freedom to prevail.

We go into the seventies from our college microcosm,
sort of as a bridge, for our class has spanned two decades,
where we hope to be accepted as women, yes, but more,
as educated people who contribute what they know.

With memories of the old and ideas of the progressive,

we introduce ourselves to you Mrs. Davis.

the Newcomb Alumna.c Association and to the world of our future endeavors.

and perhaps, to the greening of America, as the class of 1971.

—Cynthia Stevens, Newcomb '71,

"Little Commencement"

Newcomb College, May 29. 1971

I PAGE 41

i:ii5|ir_-!^J>_

". . . It is a simple enough theme I want to put before
you this morning: that in these harsh and strenuous times,
we have a profound need for exercising both compas-
sionate involvement and rational detachment in dealing
with our public troubles. Concern without rationality is
inept sentimentalism; rationality without concern, callous
manipulation. Now, as often before, we have an urgent
need for both compassion and reason.

". . . It is not, I venture to suggest, a new deterioration
in the structure and practice of our society which is
producing our present discontents. Rather, it is the emer-
gence of a new sensibility. Having raised our sights and
moral expectations, we become more sensitive to long-
existing inequities in our society and to its imperfectly
realized potentials for a humane life. In growing numbers,
we Americans direct our critical attention to the weal<-
nesses of our society just as we have long directed our
admiring attention to its strengths. In this process of
collective self-scrutiny, the more we demand of our so-
ciety, the more faults we naturally find. And we are be-
coming an exceedingly demanding people and a self-cri-
tical society. What was good enough before, in the form
of convenient compromise with principle, is no longer
judged good enough today. New priorities of values are
in the making. More and more Americans, even some
of those in the halls of Congress, are stirring themselves
out of a complacency induced by the fat and prosperous

years to ask the harder questions: affluence for what?
for whom? and what beyond affluence?

". . . The new sensibility involves an enlarged sense of
collective responsibility for what takes place in society.
Above all else, it exacts increasing accountability. It re-
quires a public accounting by those who govern our
organizations and direct our institutions, for it takes with
a new seriousness the old idea that every private en-
terprise is invested with a public interest. Organizations
in every sphere— business and religion, education and
politics, science and technology— are being held ac-
countable for acts of commission and omission to a
degree not known before. And at least the most authentic
exponents of the new sensibility know that this cuts both
ways: that they, the public critics, are also to be held
accountable for their acts of commission and omission.
They do not ask for a double standard in which the others
are to be held to the standards of a ntoral discipline which
they allow themselves to escape.

"To the distant outsider, the many new sensibles are
easily confused with the small number of the new irre-
sponsibles. But there is a great difference between them,
all the difference that matters. The new sensibles know
that ends are inseparable from the means adopted to
achieve them. They know that corrupt means corrupt

PAGE 42 /

idealistic ends. They know, too, that extremists of the
right and extremists of the left in effect join forces in
an interactive cycle of destructiveness by adopting the
doctrine and the practice of 'anything goes.' They know
that those who would maintain our institutions unchanged
'at any cost' are of a kind with those who would destroy
these institutions 'at any cost.'

The new sensibles are radical in the strict sense of
trying to get to the roots of our public troubles, of trying
to get down to fundamentals. But again, this authentic
humane commitment has nothing to do with the self-
described idealists on the fringe who only exhibit in them-
selves what they condemn in others. These are the irre-
sponsibles in every aspect. Demanding accountability
from others, they refuse to be held accountable for their
own behavior, either individual or collective. For the old
irresponsibility of laissez faire, they deny others the op-
portunity to dissent from them, imposing instead the
tyranny of the crowd, with hectoring taunts drowning out
authentic dialogue. Ostensibly concerned to do away with
the vicious epithets of race and religion, they invent a
vocabulary of hate all their own. Protesting violence
abroad and at home, they take pride in their own violence,
on and off campus. Opposing racism and sexism, they
manage to create a doctrine of agism which pits the
generations against one another. The unattractive self-
righteousness of some of the old they replace by an

unattractive self-righteousness of the young. Given to
extremes, they would replace gerontocracy by juveno-
cracy, rule by the very old with rule by the very young,
unmindful that young and old. black and white, we are
all in this together . . .

". . . You of the graduating class can aptly say, in
paraphrase of Eliot's Thomas Becket: ". . . four years
is no brevity, we shall not get these four years back
again." And an occasion celebrating these years in your
lives clearly calls for a peroration. Here, then, is mine.
It is for us all to recognize the profound difference be-
tween the new sensibility, which is our hope, and the
new irresponsibility, which is our burden. Possessed by
a belief in inevitable progress, we Americans have long
been a nation of Pollyannas: we need not become a
nation of Cassandras. We need not oscillate between an
irrepressible optimism and an irrepressible pessimism.
Other options for raising the quality of civil life are open
to us. And chief among these is the option provided by
the authentic new sensibility: the option of being humane
in our commitments, critical in our judgments and com-
passionate in our practices. May we all exercise that
option for the rest of our days."

—Dr. Robert King Merton

Commencement Address

May 31. 1971

I PACE +3

Those

who

have

made

it,
1971

/ PACE 45

COLLEGE OF ARTS
AND SCIENCES

BACHELOR OF ARTS

William Alan Robinson, summa cum laude
with honors in Psychology, Leawood, Kansas.
Randall Kirk Albers, magna cum laude with
honors in English, Dundas, Minnesota.
TWO DIRECTIONS:

DIRECTION #1-
Sensitivity
Intensity
Reality
Humanity
Stifled
Struggling
Jabbed
Juggling
I am!

DIRECTION #2-

And Tulane, shining
Southern citadel,
impotent in her
illusions of past
and delusions of
future greatness

Going down as all
good Southern-
ers— with nobility.
Going down all the
same

And eight thousand
babies in her
womb crying.
Don't take me with
you— Mother.

James Daly Austin, magna cum laude with
honors in Political Science, Burleson, Texas.
Thomas Donald Barton, magna cum laude
with honors in Political Science, Omaha, Ne-
braska.

Steven Allen Felsenthal, magna cum laude
with honors in Political Science, Tampa,
Florida.

James Piercey Price, magna cum laude with
honors in Sociology, Shreveport, Louisiana.
William Terrance Schreier, magna cum laude
with honors in History, Prairie Village, Kansas.
Stephen Andrew Vann, magna cum laude with
honors in Spanish, Montgomery, Alabama.
Kenneth Wauchope, magna cum laude with
honors in Theatre, New Orleans.
Henri Wolbrette, III, magna cum laude with
honors in Economics, New Orleans.
Jerome Albert Brown, Jr., cum laude with
honors in Anthropology, San Antonio, Texas.
Mark Stephen Davis, cum laude with honors
in Political Science, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Steven Bruce Feder, cum laude with honors
in Political Science, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
"Whether universal suffrage prevails or not.

always it is an oligarchy that gov-
erns."-Vilfredo Pareto, The Treatise
Russell Duane Pulver, cum laude with honors
in History, Sulphur, Louisiana.
Russell Moreland Weaver, cum laude with
honors in English, Tupelo, Mississippi.
Gordon Weil, III, cum laude with honors in
Economics, Cincinnati, Ohio.
John Paul Campbell, III, with honors in Soci-
ology, Ruston, Louisiana.
The sword we used to kill the king now threa-
tens us. We believed we would at last be free
to possess that blank-verse of the mind so
necessary for true freedom: we can now walk
among the flowers in an ever enlarging circular
path.

Robert Christopher Goodwin, with honors in
Political Science, Bethesda, Maryland.
Phillip Harvey Hoffman, with honors in Chem-
istry, Olivette, Missouri.
Thomas Newman Ireland, with honors in En-
glish, New Orleans.

Bruce Ross King, with honors in Anthropology,
New Orleans.

John Robert Sutter, with honors in Sociology,
Marion, Indiana.

Judson Eugene Tomlln, Jr., with honors in
Sociology, Mobile, Alabama.
Roger Alan Wagman, with honors in Psychol-
ogy, Bristol, Pennsylvania.
"I saw that the meaning of life was to secure
a livelihood, and that its goal was to attain
a high position; that love's rich dream was
marriage to an heiress; that friendship's bless-
ing was help in financial difficulties; that wis-
dom was what the majority assumed it to be;
that enthusiasm consisted in making a speech;
that it was courage to risk the loss of ten
dollars; that kindness consisted in saying, 'You
are welcome,' at the dinner table; that piety
consisted in going to communion once a year.
This I saw, and I laughed."— Kiergekaard
Charles David Abercrombie, History, Semi-
nary, Mississippi.

Ralph Roger Alexis, III, History, New Orleans.
CharlesWilliam Allen, Jr., cum /aude, History,
Silver Spring, Maryland.
Arthur Moffett Allison, III, English, Versailles,
Kentucky.

Richard Royen Anderssen, Jr., Economics,
Brick Town, New Jersey.
Samuel Henry Andrews, Psychology, Citron-
elle, Alabama.

Arthur Morris Aronson, Sociology, New Or-
leans.

Joseph Edward Baggett, cum laude, Political
Science & History, Jacksonville, North Caro-
lina.

Stewart Roland Barnett, III, Economics, New
Orleans.

James Manly Barton, II, Political Science,
Shreveport, Louisiana.

Brian Alan Bash, English, Shaker Heights,
Ohio.

Charles Cassidy Bass, III, Sociology, New
Orleans.

David John Bertau, English, Ponchatoula,
Louisiana.

Ronald Stephen Bertucci, History (Conferred
Posthumously), New Orleans.
Brent Bevers Bike, English, Reading, Pennsyl-
vania.
Jon V. Blake, Spanish & Biology, Baytown,
Texas.

Robert Louis Blum, Political Science, New
York, New York.

Joe Edd Boaz, Political Science, Anson,
Texas.

Thou Shalt not kill, slaughter, execute, napalm,
attack, subjugate, hate, or prejudice human
beings as American tradition and values dic-
tate. An immediate change is required hope-
fully through process, if not, then through any
expedient form of revolution.
Lester Daniel Bockow, History, Great Neck,
New York.

David Wells Bond, English, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands.

David Coriell Booth, History, Bellaire, Texas.
"New Orleans ... a courtesan whose hold
is strong upon the mature, to whose charm
the young must respond. And all who leave
her, seeking the virgin's unbrown, ungold hair
and her blanched and icy breast where no
lover has died, return to her when she smiles
across her languid fan."— Faulkner
Ralph Stewart Bowden, English, Coral Gables,
Florida.

Stephen Wayne Boyd, History, Clovis, New
Mexico.

Robert James Brennan, Jr., cum laude, En-
glish, St. Petersburg, Florida.
John Jacob Broders, History, New Orleans.
Charles Walter Brown, cum laude. Psychol-
ogy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clifford Allen Brown, Political Science, Para-
gould, Arkansas.

Joseph Ross Brown, Jr., English, Pekin, Illi-
nois.

Joseph Glen Bruce, Economics, Kingsport,
Tennessee.

Bruce Albert Burga, Economics, New Orleans.
Johnny Lee Burns, Psychology & French,
Fayetteville, North Carolina.
Frank Robinson Burnside, Jr., History, Ne-
wellton, Louisiana.

David Arthur Bybee, Economics, New Orleans.
Clegg Caffery, Jr., English & Geology, Frank-
lin, Louisiana.

Robert Michael Caldwell, Economics, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana.

David Byron Campell, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

"Those things for which the most money is
demanded are never the things which the
student most wants. Tuition, for instance, is
an important item in the term bill, while for
the far more valuable education which he gets
by associating with the most cultivated of his
contemporaries no charge is made."—
Thoreau, 1854

John Edward Carey, II, Sociology, Chevy
Chase, Maryland.

Howard Philip Carnes, cum laude, Economics,
College Park, Georgia.
Kenneth Michael Chackes, Psychology, St.
Louis, Missouri.

PAGE 46 /

Yeu Jwo Chin, Political Science, New Orleans
Claude Feemster Clayton, Jr., Political
Science, Tupelo, Mississippi
Crawford Haralson Cleveland, Jr., English,
Gulfport, Mississippi

James Michael Collins, History, New Orleans,
Stanley James Cooper, Psychology, Prince-
ton, New Jersey,

Robert Sherod Corbitt, Music, Louisville,
Georgia

Robert Hunter Couvlllon, History, Marl<sville,
Louisiana,

Alexander Brown Coxe, History, Greenwich,
Connecticut,

Edward Edgar Crocker, Jr., History, Sante Fe,
New Mexico.

Paul Edward Crow, History, Dallas, Texas.
Stephen Charles Curtis, Psychology, Daven-
port, Iowa.

John Nicholas Cusano, Political Science,
Orange, Connecticut.

James Gardner Dalleres, cum laude. History,
Mobile, Alabama.
A-ONE, A-TWO!
A-HELL OF A HULLABALOO!
A-HULLABALOO, RAY RAY!
A-HULLABALOO, RAY RAY!
HOORAY, HOORAY!
VARS, VARS, T-AY!
TULAME!

William Francis Danaher, Political Science,
New Orleans.

Arturo Edward D'Angelo, cum laude. History,
Hubbard, Ohio,

Richard Charles Danysh, Political Science,
San Antonio, Texas.

Robert Sherwood Dawalt, Jr., Music, Cranford,
New Jersey.

Dominick Joseph Dei Carlino, Jr., Philosophy,
Haddonfield, New Jersey.
Robert Sylvester Devins, Political Science,
North Miami, Florida,
Ish bibbly often botten,
bee bop ta teeten totten,
Owls! Owls! Night Owls!
Charles Edward DeWitt, Jr., Political Science,
Houston, Texas.

George Wilfred DIggs, Jr., Biology, New Iberia,
Louisiana.

Richard B. Dobkin, Political Science, Pitts-
burgh, Pennsylvania.
"Cookie! Cookie!"

John William Dommerich, Psychology, Coral
Gables, Florida.

John Clay Dorris, English, Biloxi, Mississippi.
John Hamilton Downs, Anthropology, Cherry
Hill, New Jersey

Frederick Bradford Drake, Jr., Political
Science, Allentown, Pennsylvania,

JImmie Louis Dresnick, Political Science,

Miami, Florida

Charles Louis Duke, History, Chicago, Illinois,

William Clark Durant, III, Economics, Grosse

Pointe, Michigan.

David Floyd Edwards, History, New Orleans,

Terence David Edwards, Political Science,

Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina.

Richard Wayne Elchenholz, Psychology,

Louisville, Kentucky

Roy Steven Elkin, Philosophy, Miami, Florida,

James Sewell Elliott, Jr., Political Science,

Macon, Georgia.

Peter John Emigh, Economics, Wauwatosa,

Wisconsin.

Chris IVIcKinney Evans, Political Science,

Jackson, Mississippi

Timothy Russell Farmer, History, Naples,

Florida.

George Edward Ferguson, Economics, Fort

Worth, Texas.

Grey Flowers Feris, History, Vicksburg, Mis-
sissippi

Thomas Norling Fiddler, History, New Orleans,
Carl William Flesher, Jr., Psychology, Rock-

ville, Maryland

Leo Anthony Fox, English, Boca Raron,

Florida.

Philip Leon Frank, Jr., Economics, New Or-
leans.

Gordon Marc Gaeihe, Psychology, Metairie,

Louisiana.

James Rufus Garts, Jr., cum laude. History,

Rolling Meadows, Illinois.

Michael Roy Geerkin, Sociology, New Orleans,

An easy windy

sleepy grass

snuggles over

fresh young

blush red

bodies

in the twilight

Michael Edward Gerlnger, History, Nashville,

Tennessee,

Steven Lee Gilmer, English, Birmingham, Ala-
bama,

Alan Barry Goer, Economics, Charleston,

South Carolina,

Victor Manuel Gomez, Psychology, Call, Co-
lumbia.

James Comstock Goodwin, Theatre, New Or-
leans.

Raymond Phillip Gordon, cum laude. Political

Science, Glencoe, Illinois.

Thomas Dodge Graffagnino, Sociology, Co-
lumbus, Georgia,

Robert Earl Griffon, Economics, Cristobal,

Canal Zone,

Harvey Mitchell Grossman, Psychology,

Shawnee Mission, Kansas,
Jay Eduard Gruber, cum laude. Economics,
Memphis, Tennessee.

Edward John Gschwender, Jr., History, Fulton,
New York,

Gordon Bernard Gsell, Jr., English, New Or-
leans,

Christopher Delaney Gwin, Economics, Ada,
Oklahoma.

Martin Richard Haase, English, Ghalmette,
Louisiana.

John Wade Haley, Political Science, Bir-
mingham, Alabama,

John David Harmatz, Economics, Baltimore,
Maryland.

William Robertson Harmon, III, Political
Science, Tangier, Morocco,
Andrew Chris Heinrichs, Political Science,
Fort Worth, Texas,

The time goes quickly, but what the hell— it
was a lot of fun I'm not about to espouse any
major philosophies, but would rather spend
the time remembering all the thrills and joys
of the GREEN WAVE and the UNIVERSITY
INN-AND REMEMBER CHOICE D-WHO
GIVES A SHIT?

Edward Joseph Hemard, III, History, New Or-
leans,

Joel Jerome Henderson, Political Science,
Greenville, Mississippi.
There is more to be learned in four years of
college than what is found in books, I have
learned this—

Stephen Michael Henry, cum laude. History,
Natchitoches, Louisiana.
Thanks and a hat-tip to; H., John, Kid, Rusty,
Jake, Craig, Stan, George, Greg, David, Pat,
Joe, Coach, Terry, Duh, Sponz, Pud, Gere,
Winston, Kay, Curly, Larry, Moe, and that about
wraps it up

Robert Dale Hertzberg, Sociology, Bayonne,
New Jersey

Dale Richard Hilding, Political Science & Latin
American Studies, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho,
"Que acredito so ventura, morir querdo y vivir

loco," For II he like a madman lived, at least
he like a wise one died —Cervantes: Don Qui-
xote

Jeffrey Alan HIrsch, History, North Miami
Beach, Florida.

Fuck the games and the machine: bless the
people

Farrell Douglas Hockemeier, English & Psy-
chology, Richmond, Missouri.
"Dear Mr, Hockemeier: We are sorry to have
to report that we are unable to act favorably
on your application for admission. With ap-
proximately 3,500 applicants for our 165 avail-
able places, we have had to reject a great
many candidates of the highest caliber. We
trust that you will be successful in pursuing
a career in the law, and we regret our inability
to include you in our entering class. Sincerely
yours, Yale Law School." EAT POOP
Robert Allen Hoffman, cum laude. English.
Great Neck, New York,

Richard Powell Hoover, III, cum laude. Politi-
cal Science, Elizabeth, New Jersey.
LCNFF ILLCDS NZIDO UITDC WURVX ZSJZC
DGGKD SCWPP MFLCS ILHHH XTELB
GHYCY OPTEJ YGZEM MPPHE MCYOZ
CRHAW LUYZV HINLT YDGGK KTMZV
LESWL HOVYD ECOGA MOHTH PHYPE
UGGAZ ZHHTN LEXBS KMNPL OTFXK
SWWZX STDGL OUBBH PPYZM ANATH
AMDSL DFYSX MRYAP LUYXV This is a po-
lyalphabetic substitution using the Vigenere
tableau The keyphrase is GO TO HELL LSU
Mark Richard Horowitz, History. Niles, Illinois.
ODE TO TULANE:
If one should stick his finger in his navel

and decide the world is sick.
He also should remember where he chose

the spot his finger is to pick:
For while he sits and ponders over all the

horrors that before him lie.
He should consider soon his stomach will
begin to bleed and he shall die!
Ward Ackert Howard, Political Science, Fori
Worth, Texas.

Charles Edward Hucks, History, Jacksonville.
Florida

Robert Charles Irvine, History. New Orleans
Peter Andrew Jacobson, History, Coral
Gables, Florida

Gregg Allen Johnson, Philosophy, Claremont,
California.

Bruce Sidney Johnston, Political Science. New
Orleans,

John Paul Juhasz, History, New Haven, Con-
necticut.

George Stephen Kantor, Political Science,
Yonkers, New York.

Ronald Ivan Kaplan, Spanish. Atlanta, Geor-
gia,

Miles Butler Kehoe, Psychology, Metairie.
Louisiana.

The memory is like a tape player recording
day to day experience. May we play back from
what we remember.

Charles Francis Kelley, Jr., cum laude. Ger-
man, Plainfield, New Jersey,
Since I am in the "over-SO" age group, I feel
that I can present a slant different from that
of my younger classmates— the weather the
past four years has been great!!!
Thomas Nelson Kennedy, Jr., History, Sterl-
ing, Kentucky.

Stewart Joseph Kepper, Jr., History, New Or-
leans.

Michael Joseph Khourl, Economics. Paducah.
Kentucky.

Barney Dean King, Economics, Cliftonville,
Mississippi.

Richard Owen Kingrea, History, Seabrook,
Texas

Bruce Steven Kingsdorf, Psychology. Bala
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania.
John Christopher KIrchner, Philosophy,
McLean, Virginia.

/ PACE 47

Manuel Lisandro Knight, Economics, Wash-
ington, District of Columbia.
The Tulane Student Body is a good follower— It
eventually picks up and adopts any of the
ideas, trends, or styles popular at the time.
It does not set or start any of its own. There
are many people here who shouldn't be;
they're here for the wrong reasons, or for none
at all— just to pass the time comfortably or for
pleasure. Perhaps that's why Tulane is such
a great follower. Nevertheless, I think you can
get a fine education here, a very good one
with lots of effort and an open mind.
Christopher Lee Kocsis, English & Spanish,
Mexico City, D.F., Mexico.
Steven Charles Kramer, cum laude. History,
Dayton, Ohio.

Tulane's been up so long it looks like down
to me.

Alan Dean Laff, English, Englewood, Colorado.
A Sunset Brighter:

The Painter pulled His palette

And His brush and tubes of pink and blue

The pigment pink of cotton clouds

The powder blue of weathered ink.

Upon the canvas bare of life

He drew a sunset pale

The pink itself was not enough

To give His painting life.

He threw His canvas to the ground

And put another in its place.

A glowing globe He formed of blue

And yet this, too.

Was not enough.

He pondered on for six long days

And just when he was wont to yield

This canvas which was His life's quest

His mind was siezed with painful joy.

He took the palette from the shelf

And once again the pink and powder blue.

Into a sparkling crystal jar

He emptied both His tubes of oil.

He stirred them with His marten brush

And watched the colors 'gin to merge:

The swirls of blue enclosed in pink

The pink encased in blue

The separate colors merged in one

No longer pink or blue-
But new.

More full than ever seen before.

A nouveau hue

He used to paint

A sunset brighter

Than the true.

—Denver, August 8, 1970
David Murrie Leal<e, History, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Edward Francis Le Breton, English, New Or-
leans.

Robert Edward Lee, History, Rye, New York.
Wayne Joseph Lee, Political Science, New
Orleans.

Terrence Jude Lestelle, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

Richard Dana Lester, cum laude. Economics,
Houston, Texas.

James Shih Kwong Leung, Sociology, Brook-
lyn, New York.
Loneliness was first my fate
it tormented me and wasn't great
now and then I became a friend
deeply rooted it was to grown and blend
alas, what is most to grow is my love for:

amelicka da bewteefoo,

bevrteefoo amelickan democlacy,

plotestan etic,

me sing too you bullshit,

look around,

turn around.

DO IT. . . .
Robert Norman Levinson, Spanish, Atlanta,
Georgia.

The Vulgar "we"— A thought & poem
Heads in the sand, feet toward the sky,
They read the words, meaning unknown
Stature erect in coat and tie
Who can guess the winds their hearts have
blown?

Sam Laib Levkowicz, Sociology, New Orleans.
Clifford Jon Levy, Sociology, New Orleans.
"Society highly values its norman man. It edu-
cates children to lose themselves and to be-
come absurd, and thus to be normal . . . We
are not able even to THINK adequately about
the behavior that is at the annihilating edge.
But what we think is less than we know; what
we know is less than what we love; what we
love is so much less than what there is. And
to that precise extent, we are so much less
than what we are."— R. D. Laing
Walter Edmond Levy, English, New Orleans.
Stephen Robert Lewis, Jr., Economics & Polit-
ical Science, Galveston, Texas.
William Sproull Lewis, English, Warren, Ohio.
Ray Theodore LIuzza, English, Arabi, Loui-
siana.

Dale Gordon Long, Psychology, Grosse Point,
Michigan.

Peter Andrew Lopez, Political Science & Latin
American Studies, Victoria, Texas.
Albert Sheley Low, Jr., History, Houston,
Texas.

William Barry Mabry, Economics, New Or-
leans.
The crowd applaudes for the magnificient

catch.
They cheer for a Sayers-like run.
They watch in awe as giants match
Their fists in what's more than fun.

But the hero isn't the quarterback, or halfback,
Or coach who stands above them all.
The hero is a pig, without whose skin
There would be no ball.
David Toby Magrish, History & Political
Science, Cincinnati, Ohio.
John Robert Mahon, History, Miami, Florida.
Irwin Mandelkern, Political Science, Tallahas-
see, Florida.

Robert Louis Marcus, Economics & English,
Shreveport, Louisiana.

Mark Francis Marley, English, Bellevue, Wis-
consin.

What can I say about a girl who sat on a tuffet?
Ernest Grover Martin, III, Political Science,
Gulfport, Mississippi.

Leon Eugene Martiny, History, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Michael Frederick Marvin, Philosophy, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana.

Jon Grant Massey, History, Jackson, Missis-
sippi.

John Graham McCarron, Jr., cum laude, Eco-
nomics, Warrington, Florida.
Edward Miller McCord, Political Science, Ok-
lahoma City, Oklahoma.
Charles Edwin McElwain, History, Washing-
ton, District of Columbia.
George Franklin McGowin, Economics, Pine-
wood, Louisiana.

Eugene Belton McLeod, Jr., Political Science,
Pinewood, South Carolina.
Yesterdays are memories, tomorrow is a dream
and today is hell.

John Hall McManus, History, Atlantic Beach,
Florida.

Jules Hampton Mercier, Music, Metairie,
Louisiana.

John Gammons Merrill, Political Science,
Washington, District of Columbia.
Richard Kendrick Mersman, III, English, St.
Louis, Missouri.

Michael Powell Minette, Philosophy, Pelham
Manor, New York.

Jeflrey Michael Mishkin, English, Mamaron-
eck. New York.

William Doyle Mize, Classical Languages, Tu-
scaloosa, Alabama.

Stephen Anees Mogabgab, Economics, New
Orleans.

Ronald Roy Moore, Political Science, Tripoli,
Libya.

Michael Harvey Moskowitz, History, New York,
New York.

John Wright Muery, Political Science, New
Orleans.

John Joseph Murphy, Jr., Political Science,
New Orleans.

Freddie Bernard Negem, Jr., English, Jones-

boro, Louisiana.

Andrew Gage Nichols, Political Science, West

Newbury, Massachusetts.

Alton Willard Obee, Jr., Political Science, New

Orleans.

Wayne Melvin Ondiak, Political Science, New
York, New York.

Russell Stuart Palmer, History, Selma, Ala-
bama.

Patrick Michael Patterson, Philosophy, Pen-
sacola, Florida.

John Hodgeland Pemberton, History, Milwau-
kee, Wisconsin.

David Thomas Pence, English, Decatur, Illi-
nois.

William Clifton Penick, III, Economics, New
Orleans.

Viktor Vaclav Pohorelsky, Economics, Lake
Charles, Louisiana.

Edward Butts Poitevent, II, History, Gretna,
Louisiana.

Elon Abram Pollack, Sociology, Millburn, New
Jersey.

Albert Miles Pratt, III, Economics, New Or-
leans.

Robert Ray Punches, History, Natchez, Mis-
sissippi.

Daniel Ellis Raskin, Political Science, Savan-
nah, Georgia.

Charles Henderson Redmond, II, Sociology,
Delmar, New York.

There's too much money in this preppy little
school.

Joseph Scott Reeves, History, Nashville, Ten-
nessee.

Atwood Lumberd Rice, III, History, New Or-
leans.

For what does it profit a man if he getteth a
Tulane diploma? . . . Can he gain the whole
world? . . . Shall he loseth his soul? . . . Wist
ye not, ye shall soon find out— but only God
knows for sure . . . Tune in and let the Son
shine.

Charles Richard, Economics, Flossmoor, Illi-
nois.

Never has anything taken so long to obtain!
James Everett Richardson, Spanish, New Or-
leans.

Lamar Merriott Richardson, Jr., Frankllnton,
Louisiana.

Robert Louis Rines, Political Science, Bel-
mont, Massachusetts.

Bradford Lee Roller, Economics, Beachwood,
Ohio.

Richard Steven Rosen, English, Charleston,
South Carolina.

Louis James Rovelli, cum laude, Political
Science, Albany, New York.
Fernando Sanchez, Jr., History & Latin Ameri-
can Studies, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Sam Paul Scelfo, Jr., Economics, New Iberia,
Louisiana.

Jay Bayard Schiller, Mathematics, Fort Worth,
Texas.

OF A POEM:

Visit a school every day for four years,
Take notes in class and copy your friend's

when you don't go.
Try hard on tests and keep a high average.
Then go out and try to make some money.
(I should of probably of known to major in

English.)
Edwin Otto Schlesinger, History, New Orleans.

PAGE 48 /

Henry George Schmidt, Jr., Art New Orleans.

Donald Bolcum Scott, Jr., History, Wauwatosa.

Wisconsin

Thomas Charles Senette, History, Franklin.

Louisiana

Charles Marshall Sevadjlan, cum laude. An-
thropology & Biology, Fort Worth, Texas.
In each of the following sequences, cross out
the one word or phrase which does not belong:

1. icecream Dubinsky motion sickness
drama pointer

2. height yes Irving/ Ban Antiperspirant/
Monk Simons

3. tripod Eddie Price's/ knot/ how/ burl/
it's

answer: Everything should be crossed out.

including the directions, the rest of

this page, and the word shit wherever

it is encountered.

Paul Charles Sills, English, New York. New

York.

Walter Alan Sommers, Philosophy. Atlanta.
Georgia.

Evan Ragland Soule,'Jr,, cum laude. Art His-
tory, New Orleans.

"Tis a pity that man remains in a semi-barbaric
state, ironically clinging to the concept that
freedom through government is possible. Per-
haps in some enlightened moment yet to come,
civilized man will break these mythological
chains that bind him and realize for the first
time in his brief history that freedom comes
only from within.— TanstaafI
Scott Preston Spector, History, Skokie, Illinois
Stephen Lee Spomer, History. Cairo, Illinois.
Louis Jerome Stanley, History, New Orleans.
Andrew Jay Stillpass, English, Cincinnati,
Ohio.

Arthur Wendel Stout, III, History, Houston.
Texas

Looking at some of my classmates, I can see
why many people say Tulane is going down

Melvin Vernon Strahan, Political Science &
Spanish, Bogalusa, Louisiana.
Douglas Martin Sweet, Anthropology, New
Orleans

Louis Edward Tanner, Jr., English, Marathon,
Florida.

James Perry Tatum, History, Anderson, Mis-
souri.

Dean Edward Taylor, English, New Orleans.
"My sword I give to him that will succeed
succeed me in my pilgrimage, and my courage
and skill to him that can get it. My works and
scars I carry with me to be a witness for me
that I have fought his battles who will now be
my rewarder." (from Pilgrim's Progess)

O where is John Gait?
Frank Randolph Tedards, cum laude. Political
Science, Greenville, South Carolina.
"Which way do we go from here?" said Alice
to the Cheshire cat. That depends a good deal
on where you want to go," said the cat. "Oh,
that really doesn't matter . . . , " said Alice.
"Then, it doesn't really matter which way you
go," said the cat. "As long as I get some-
where," said Alice, by way of explanation. "Oh,
you're sure to do that," said the cat. "if only
you walk far enough."— Carroll, Alice in Won-
derland

Richard Eric Teller, Philosophy & Political
Science, Great Neck, New York.
Robert Holland Thomas, Political Science,
Metairie. Louisiana

Christopher Dickson Thompson, History,
Houston, Texas.

James Powers Thompson, Economics,

Franklin. Tennessee.

Robert Eugene Thompson, Jr., History. Fort

Worth, Texas.

Samuel Berry Thompson, Jr., English. Little

Rock, Arkansas

Ronald Stephen Tllley, Political Science,

Shreveport, Louisiana.

Max Nathan Tobias, Jr., Political Science. New
Orleans.

Steven Alan Tolle, History, Rizal, Philippines.
Joseph Francis Toomy. 11, Economics, Gretna.
Louisiana

William Richard Trant, Sociology. Oak Lawn,
Illinois.

Andrew McLean Treichler, History, Wiliams-
burg, Virginia.

Richard Gorman Verlander, Jr.. Economics,
New Orleans

David Lee Walker, History, Fort Lauderdale,
Florida

Robert Harvey Watson, History, De Ridder,
Louisiana.

One is necessarily grateful to his Alma Mater
for her solicitous care. As a son cognizant of
how hard it is being a mother nowadays, I wish
her well, wish her better, and the best
(mother's liberation?).

Craig Bryon Well, History, Highland Park, Illi-
nois.

Robert Cardon Wessler, History, Gultport.
Mississippi.

John Albert Williams, Political Science. Mont-
gomery. Alabama

Paul Raymond Williams, III. Sociology, Tulsa,
Oklahoma

Chris Patrick Winter, Economics, New Or-
leans

Robert Allen Wlssner, English, New Orleans
Keith Douglas Wood, History, New Orleans.
Charles Randol Harper Wright, Jr., History,
Nassau. Bahamas

William Everard Wright, Jr., Economics, New
Orleans

Stephen Howard Zagor, Political Science, New
York. New York

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE

Monty Kreiger, summa cum laude with honors
in Chemistry. New Orleans.
My thanks to Dr. Aguiar. Dr. Cusachs. and Dr.
Fritchie for stimulation, many opportunities,
and all of their encouragement. I am indebted
to my JYA friends, the kind of people universi-
ties were meant for. To those who would de-
stroy the university, this "scheme of barbarous
philosophy . . is the offspring of cold hearts

/ PACE 49

and muddy understandings, and is as void of
solid wisdom as it is destitute of all taste and
elegance." "Believe me. sir, all those who try
to level, never equalize,"

Clyde William McCurdy, Jr., summa cum laude

with honors in Chemistry, Stone Mountain,

Georgia.

William Henry Cummings, ill, magna cum

laude with honors in Psychology, San Antonio,

Texas.

Harris Gregory Etfron, magna cum laude with
honors in Biology, Great Neck. New York.
James Henry Fife, magna cum laude with
honors in Mathematics, Avondale Estates,
Georgia.

James Michael Riopelle, magna cum laude
with honors in Psychology, Covington, Loui-
siana.

Marie Benjamin Stoopler, magna cum laude
with honors in Biology, Great Neck, New York.
Lehman Kullman Preis, Jr., cum laude with
honors in Psychology, Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Raymond Clarence Seghers, cum laude with
honors in Psychology, Jacksonville, Florida.

I have had a great four years here and I had
a great time living them. I will always remember
the antics of freshmen year, the appled door
of sophomore yeaar, math classes of junior
year, and norel of senior year. Not to mention
Mardi Gras of all four years— or at least what
I remember of them.

Dennis Ronald Stewart, cum laude with honors
in Physics, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Alan Marvin Wagner, cum laude with honors
in Psychology. Cincinnati, Ohio.
About Tulane— there are times when I doubt
if I would do it again— there are also times
when I'm sure I would.
About the rest— have a peace of it.
Jeffrey Alan Basen, with honors in Psychology,
Houston, Texas.

"If on each occasion instead of referring your
actions to the end of nature, your turn to some
other nearer standard when you are making
a choice or an avoidance, your actions will
not be consistant with your princi- ■
pies."— Epicurus

Anthony Vincent LaNasa, with honors in Biol-
ogy. New Orleans.
As sports afficiando supremo I predict that

Tulane will be "the" athletic powerhouse of
the 70's. In addition to starting a football dy-
nasty, the Wave will establish a regime in
basketball and monopolies in baseball, track,
tennis, and swimming.

Henceforth, the "Harvard of the South" will
be known as the "Notre Dame of the East
Bank".

John Charles Mutziger, with honors in Anthro-
pology, Natchez. Mississippi.
Steven Bruce Aclcerman, Biology, Hallandale,
Florida.

Stephen Perry Allen, Mathematics, St. Louis,
Missouri.

Patrick Joseph Ande, Biology, West Palm
Beach, Florida.

Arnold Edward Applebaum, Psychology, Fort
Worth, Texas.

John William Audick, cum laude. Psychology,
Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Robert Baron Barbor, Biology, Meridian, Mis-
sissippi.

Jonathan Scott Barnett, Psychology. Great
Neck, New York.

Gregory Emile Bertucci, Biology, New Orleans,
There were a thousand sensations, tastes,
loves, hates, joys, disappointments, accom-
plishments, failures and sleepless nights that
made up my college experience. As my file
gets neatly lost among all the others, I can
recount the lessions that only time could teach
me: to smile is to breath; to laugh is to grow;
to love is to live; to dope is to die a little.
Sidney Joseph Bertucci, cum laude. Chemis-
try, Metairie, Louisiana.
Don Edward Blackard, Geology, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana.

The Plague agrees: "Whenever you see a
public building with Gothis fenestration on a
sturdy backing of Indian concrete, you may
be certain that it is another university, with
anywhere from 200 to 20.000 students equally
ardent about avoiding the disadvantages of
becoming learned and about gaining the social
prestige contained in the possession of a B.A.
degree."— Sinclair Lewis
Cormell Robert Brooks, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

Roy Leonard Brown, Jr., cum laude. Physics
& Mathematics, Atlanta, Georgia.
The purpose of "higher" education is not just
memorization of facts we didn't learn in high
school; rather, we came to Tulane to learn
how to think for ourselves. Thus, we should
no longer be willing to exist by memorizing
the formulae of our existence as given by
others. WE can and must exist by our own
minds.

Gordon Ransdell Cain, Psychology, Lake
Providence, Louisiana.

Albert Bradford Calhoun, Jr., Psychology,
Chickasaw, Alabama.

Edward Fenton Carter, III, Biology, Tampa,
Florida.

James Aldon Colvocoresses, Biology, Fairfax,
Virginia.

Carl Allan Cozine, Psychology, Fort Myers,
Florida.

Bruce Lance Craig, Biology, Syosset. New
York.

To be hung up is human, to care about other
people's hang ups is divifte.
Alvin Stanley Cullick, cum laude. Chemistry,
Shreveport, Louisiana.

Richard Darreli Cunningham, Biology.
Springfield, Missouri.

Kenny Dale Davis, Geology. Gulfport, Missis-
sippi.

Don Gordon DeCoudres, Psychology, Syla-
cauga, Alabama.

Drake Anthony De Grange, Biology, New Or-
leans.

James Henry Diaz, Biology, New Orleans.
David Bruce Dodd, Biology. Metairie, Loui-

PAGE 50 /

Glad it's almost over. I feel Tulane is a good
school, but could be a great schiool Many
areas need improving (e.g. student-faculty
relations) Newcomb and Tulane could be bet-
ter integrated I feel Southern Romanticism Is
holding the University down and until the Uni-
versity becomes autonomous, no appreciable
progress will be made

AndrewOllverDonelson, Chemistry, Memphis,
Tennessee

William George Donnellan, Jr., Chemistry.
Winter Park, Florida,

Lawrence Joseph Dries, cum laude. Buccino,
Louisville, Kentucky,

Kenneth James Ducote, cum laude. Mathe-
matics, Metairie, Louisiana.
While going through four years at Tulane, I
felt that little was worthwhile. However, upon
looking back, I see that I have benefitted from
the curricular and extracurricular offerings. I
guess the more you put in the more you get
out

Randall Clyde Ellzey, Chemistry, Alexandria,
Louisiana

David Moniek Fajgenbaum, Chemistry. Trini-
dad, West Indies.

Entropy Personified— Tulane students— It was
great, but thank God its over.
Erasmus Eugene Feltus, Mathematics, New
Orleans.

George d'Artenay Fender, Jr., Chemistry, Gro-
ton, Connecticut.

Joe Wedeles FIxel, Psychology, Quincy,
Florida.

William Harold Fleming, III, Biology, Dallas,
Texas.

Kenneth Charles Fortgang, Mathematics, Nat-
chez, Mississippi

Adventure'' Drama'' Comedy? FARCEM
Richard William Fothe, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

Clay Bruce Frederick, Biology & Chemistry.
Arlington. Texas.
"No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant

to be . . .
Deferential, glad to be of use.
Politic, cautious, and meticullous;
Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;
At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—
Almost, at times, the Fool."

— Prufrock
Louis Donell Freeman, Physics. Irving, Texas.
Joe Lagrange and Bill Hamilton were pretty
sharp guys, but time integrals are nonetheless
a pain in the neck.
Gregory Lloyd Garvin. Biology, Bettendorf,

Iowa.

Ted Wayne Gay, cum laude. Psychology, Har-
vey, Louisiana

Robert Michael GIngold, Mathematics, Great
Neck, New York

Barry Jay Goldsmith, Psychology, Atlanta,
Georgia.

William Leroy Goss, Psychology, San Antonio,
Texas

Dennis Gerard Gregoire, cum laude. Psychol-
ogy, New Orleans.

Howard Alcida Grenier, Biology, New Orleans.
Walter George Grundy, Anthropology, Okla-
homa City, Oklahoma.
Neal N. Haber, Psychology, Miami, Florida.
Edwfin Clayborn Harris, Biology. Joplin, Mis-
sissippi

Michael Oates Harris, Geology, San Juan,
Costa Rica

Charles Edward Herlihy, Jr., Biology. Bir-
mingham. Alabama,

John Young Hess, Psychology. Massillion.
Ohio.

Richard Gene Hibbs, Jr., Biology. New Or-
leans

Waters Merrill Hicks, Jr., Psychology. Green-
wood. Mississippi.

Robert Scott Howard, Biology. Knoxville, Ten-
nessee.

George Eli Howell, II, Biology. Meridian, Mis-
sissippi-
Thomas Newman Ireland, Psychology, New
Orleans.

Harry Joe, Mathematics, Clarksdale, Missis-
sippi.

It's a hell of a long way up only to find yourself
at the bottom of the ladder again.
Dennis Kasimian, cum laude. Biology, Indio,
California.

Sam Joseph Kayser, III, Psychology, Mobile,
Alabama,

Rickey Crawford Kirkpatrick, Chemistry,
Suger Land. Texas,

Raymond Lawrence Knecht, Jr., Chemistry.
Levittown. Pennsylvania,
James Howard Kravetz, Biology. Dallas,
Texas.

Bruce Edward Krell, Mathematics, Hatties-
burg, Mississippi.

Stan Joseph Kwiatkowski, Biology, Glynco,
Georgia.

Eurgia Charles Land, Biology, Donaldsonville,
Louisiana.
Lee Hamilton Latimer, cum laude. Chemistry,

Dallas. Texas.

"A man has three faces— the one he shows,
the one he has. and the one he thinks he
has "—Old Spanish Proverb The same can
be said many times over for this university.
Bruce Fongsie Lee, Biology. Mobile. Alabama.
As I lay here almost asleep my mind
At ease, not caring what will happen next.
My life has not been what I had in mind.
But I am pleased with life but still perplexed.
Have I done what is wrong, have I done right?
Would I have been more pleased if I were
great?

Does it mean anything? Because who writes
About a simple man. who cares his fate?
No prize, no lame, no glory I have won.
But happy I have been a simple man.
No cares, no worries but a lot of fun.
With good and bad things I have lived hand

in hand.
Now wonder if I have lived at all!
How many lived like me. just lived, that's

all?
Dwight Augustus Lee, Biology, Mankato, Min-
nesota.

Richard Harris Leichuck, Psychology, Miami.
Florida.

Gary Morton Levison, Biology. Nashville. Ten-
nessee.

Randolph Gates Lewis, Psychology. Tallahas-
see Florida

Eric Donald Lucy, Biology. Metairie. Louisiana.
Stephen Philip Lukin. Biology. Dallas. Texas.
Michael H. Lutz. Physics. Canton. Mississippi.
Michael Lanham Magee, Chemistry & German,
Blackwell. Texas

Mark Leonard Marbey. Chemistry. Miami.
Florida.

Robert Devers McDonald, Psychology, Salli-
saw, Oklahoma.

John Paul McGlynn, Biology, New Shrews-
bury. New Jersey.

Leo John McKenna, III, Mathematics, Metairie.
Louisiana.

James Robert McNeal, Biology. West Palm
Beach. Florida.

Daniel Ward Merdes, Physics, New Orleans.
Many people are like tugboats; they toot loud-
est in a fog.

Hugh Douglas Miller, Chemistry. Fern Park.
Florida.

Francis Marion Moore, cum laude. Mathe-
matics. Metairie, Louisiana.
Irvin Wilmer Morgan, Jr., Mathematics. New
Orleans,

Edward James Moskowitz, cum laude. Biol-
ogy. Long Island City. New "york.
Robert Carlton Nail, Biology. Foley. Alabama.
Walter Edward Norton. Biology, Pineville,
Louisiana,

Elliott Ray Novy, Psychology. San Antonio.
Texas.

Arthur Franklin Paulina. Jr., cum laude. Math-
ematics. Lincrott. New Jersey.
Michael Jackson Pentecost, Mathematics, De
Funiak Springs. Florida,
Walter Peter Raarup. III. Biology, Darien. Con-
necticut,

Edward Blake Reese, Jr., Mathematics. Elm-
hurst, Illinois.

Atwood Lumberd Rice, III. Chemistry. New
Orleans.

Lewis Spencer Roach, Psychology. Nashville.
Tennessee.

Edward Paul Roberson. Biology. Lafayette,
Louisiana,

In case any prospective college student should
be reading this—

"If you get a chance to attend Tulane—
DON'T'

Eric Mark Rockstroh, Psychology. San An-
tonio. Texas.

/ PAGE 31

Charles Sanford Ruark, Jr., cum laude. Math-
ematics, Decatur, Alabama.
Robert Edward Ruderman, c urn laude, Biology,
Glencoe, Illinois.

John Bernard Salstone, Biology, Glencoe,
Illinois.

Jon Wilkins Searcy, Psychology, Gulf Breeze,
Florida.

The only thing I've learned in four years at
this institution of higher learning is that "there
are answers". It was fun, but I wouldn't do
itagain. Gottago now— I think I hear my mother
calling, or is that Uncle Sam? But I don't wanna
go! I'm too young . . .

Jerry Eugene Sims, Biology, Monroe, Loui-
siana.

Randlow Smith, Jr., cum laude. Chemistry,
Houston, Texas.

Alvin Roy Solomon, Biology, Helena, Ar-
kansas.

Donald James Sommers, Chemistry, St. Louis,
Missouri.

Leonard Donald Stein, Psychology, Atlanta,

Georgia.

David Kirk Stirton, Biology, Houston, Texas.

Terence Kevin Sullivan, Biology. Los Alamitos,

California.

Tulane, you've come a long way; but you're

not there yet. It's been real.

Thomas Frederick Van Buskirk, Psychology,

Shawnee Mission, Kansas.

Stephen Bernard Webb, III, Biology, New Or-
leans.

Richard Louis Weinberg, Biology, New Or-
leans.

Ronald Merrill Weiss, Biology, Scarsdale, New

York.

Eric Hamilton Worrall, Geology, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia.

Matthew LeeZettI, Anthropology, Pepper Pike,

Ohio.

Robert James Zurcher, Mathematics, Mercer

Island, Washington.

H. SOPHIE NEWCOMB
MEMORIAL COLLEGE

BACHELOR OF ARTS

Katharine Fraser, summa cum laude, with
Honors in English, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Sharon Leslie Flashman, summa cum laude.
Psychology, Miami, Florida.
Sarah Culbertson Scott, summa cum laude,
Italian, New Orleans.

Dorothy Carroll Toby, Summa cum laude,
English, Summit, New Jersey.
Jo Derrickson Bounds, magna cum laude, with
honors in Art History, Salisbury, Maryland.
Diane Burnside, magna cum laude, with
honors in Sociology, Miami, Florida.
MaryJaneMcClintock, magna cum /aude, with
honors in Economics, Baytown, Texas.
Gayle Louise Monroe, magna cum laude, with
honors in Theatre, New Orleans.
Ileana Oroza, magna cum laude, with honors
in English, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Harriet Louise Porzig, magna cum laude, with
honors in Philosophy, Tavares, Florida.
Shari Diane Sobel, magna cum laude, with
honors in Political Science, Muncie, Louisiana.
Shelley Lee Citron, magna cum laude. Soci-
ology, Amarillo, Texas.
Susan Faye Clade, magna cum laude. History,
New Orleans.

Shelley Fonda Dorfman, magna cum laude.
Sociology, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Carol Ann Freeman, magna cum laude, Soci-
ology, New Orleans.

Barbara Bolton Hall, magna cum laude. Soci-
ology, Alexandria, Louisiana.
Eleanor Conway Riley, magna cum laude.
Sociology, Savannah, Georgia.
Cynthia Ann Stevens, magna cum laude, Po-
litical Science, Scarsdale, New York.
Katherine Ann Templefon, magna cum laude,
French, Terre Haute, Indiana.
Riki Pauline Weinstein, magna cum laude.
History, Houston, Texas.
Martha Jane Zimmerman, magna cum laude.
Political Science, Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Leia Margaret Blain, cum laude, with honors
in English, Beaumont, Texas.
Kathleen Marilynn Ferguson, cum laude, with
honors in English, Houston, Texas.
[*see pg. 15]

Patricia Doran Hanks, cum laude, with honors
in English, Kaplan, Louisiana.
Tamra Sindler, cum laude, with honors in Art
History, New York, New York.
Cristine Marie Traxler, cum laude, with honors
in Economics, Baytown, Texas.
Carol Valentine Coleman, with honors in Psy-
chology, Melbourne, Australia.
Nancy Christina Harris, with honors in English,
Greenwood, Mississippi.
Saralyn Fran Jacobson, with honors in En-
glish, Galveston, Texas.
Jeanne Kinsella Abrams, English, Brighton,
Massachusetts.

Regan Anne TullyAlford, English, Washington,
District of Columbia.

Maridel Allen, Political Science, Jenks, Okla-
homa.

Isabel Phyllis Alper, Psychology, West Palm
Beach, Florida.

Carol Anne Antosiak, Philosophy, Brookfield,
Illinois.

Joan Arbour, English, New Orleans.
Linda Faye Aronson, History, Dayton, Ohio.
Marilyn Ann Asher, Sociology, Bogalusa,
Louisiana.

Emay Buchanan Baird, Anthropology, New
Orleans.

Janice Lynn Bartley, Speech, New Orleans.
Meryl Robin Becker, English, Garden City,
New York.

Marcia Louise Bennett, English, Largo,
Florida.

Nancy Dale Berk, cum laude. Sociology &

Speech, Miami, Florida.

Charlotte Robinson Beyer, Political Science,

New Orleans.

Deborah Jewel Biber, American Studies,

Gainesville, Florida.

Judy Laurance Black, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

Otelia Cristina Bogran, Economics, Teguci-
galpa, Honduras.

Catherine DeForest Boudreaux, French, New

Orleans.

Bonnie Sue Brody, English, Miami, Florida.

Carolyn Sue Brown, Sociology, Ada, Okla-
homa.

Lillie Helen Brum, Psychology, New Orleans.

Andrea Inez Bucaro, History, New Orleans.

Carolyn Holden Burga, English, Metairie,

Louisiana.

Gilda Armstrong Butler, Psychology & Soci-
ology, New Orleans.

Sarah Jane Cannon, History, Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania.

Marguerite Elizabeth Carrell, cum laude,

Spanish, Maitland, Florida.

Sharon Elizabeth Carrigan, English, Pasa-

dena, Texas.

Stephanie Ellen Carter, Art History, New Or-
leans.
Elizabeth Ann Childress, History, New Or-

leans.

Alida Blanche Clark, Political Science,
Clarksdale, Mississippi.
Joan Marie Cloninger, English, Beaumont,
Texas.

Rina Cohan, English, Miami, Florida.
Elizabeth Genel Cokinos, English, Beaumont,
Texas.

Mary Martha Curd, Psychology, St. Peters-
burg, Florida.

Sondra Anita Daum, Sociology, Miami, Florida.
Mary Gwen Davidson, Art History, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana.

Vivian Joan Davila, cum laude, Latin American
Studies & Political Science, New Orleans.
Carolyn May Davis, French & Linguistics,
Montgomery, Alabama.
Geraldine Suzanne DeLong, Sociology, Dade
City, Florida.

Carol Lynn Demuth, Sociology, Metairie,
Louisiana.

Sandra Lois Denari, Psychology, Timonium,
Maryland.

Judith Zatarain Dinwiddle, Economics, Me-
tairie, Louisiana.

Bonnie MacHauer Dyer, English, New Orleans.
End The War Now

Donna Jean Dykes, cum laude, Spanish,
Crockett, Texas.
Jean Blaise Eagan, American Studies, New

Orleans.

Gene Ann Ellis, Sociology, Waco, Texas.

Beverly Ann English, French, New Orleans.

Judith Eve Fagin, Art History, New Orleans.

Marie Dennette Farwell, Geology & History,

New Orleans.

Ellen Frances Finley, Spanish, Carthage, Mis-
souri.

Loretta Tobe Finn, History, Houston, Texas.

Loxley Childs Fitzpatrick, English, Jefferson-

ville, Georgia.

Lucy Arrington Flack, Art History, New Or-
leans.

Mary Frances Fonte, cum laude. History, New

Orleans.

Elizabeth Will Fouts, Anthropology, Monroe,

Louisiana.

Maxine Fran Frawley, French, New York, New

York.

Patricia Friedler, American Studies, New Or-
leans.

Sarah Cooper Garvin, cum laude, English,

New Orleans.

Kathy Jean Glick, Psychology, Milwaukee,

Wisconsin.

Cheryl Evelyn Golasinski, Psychology, New

Orleans.

Susan Barbara Goldfaden, cum laude. Soci-
ology, Houston, Texas.

Janice Leigh Gonzales, Political Science, Me-
tairie, Louisiana.

How doth the little crocodile
Improve his shining tail,

And pour the waters of the Nile
On every golden scale!

How cheerfully he seems to grin.

How neatly spread his claws.
And welcome little fishes in

With gently smiling jaws.

—The Crocodile, by Louis Carroll
Betty Jane Gordon, English, Pittsburgh, Penn-
sylvania.

Barbara Anderson Gott, Political Science,
Lookout Mountain, Tennessee.
Betty Antoinette Gray, English, New Orleans.
Ellen Jervey Hanckel, English, Charleston,
South Carolina.

Virginia Harris, cum laude. History, Shreve-
port, Louisiana.
Sandra Jean Hartley, Political Science, Mem-

PAGE 52 /

phis. Tennessee.

Mariha Elizabeth Hartman, Latin American
Studies & Spanish. McAllen. Texas.
Eleanor Clark Hasselle, Psychology, Memphis,

Tennessee.

Stephanie Waguespack Haynes, History, New

Orleans

Jean Barton Hendrickson, Anthropology, New

Orleans

Janet Ellen Heatherwick. History, Shreveport,

Louisiana

Rose Marie Horn, cum laude, English, New

Orleans,

Patricia Louise Hopkins, Economics, New

Orleans.

"Give instruction to a wise man, and he will

be yet wiser; teach a just man, and he will

increase in learning."— Proverbs 9:9

Barbara Lynn Houk, English, Albuquerque,

New Mexico.

Janet Louise Hume, Anthropology & History,

Loraine, Ohio.

Martha Elizabeth Igert, cum laude. Art History,

Paducah. Kentucky

Mary Elizabeth Jackson, Spanish, New Or-
leans.

Karen Gall Johnson, French, Tulsa, Okla-
homa

Lynne Johnston, Art History, New Orleans.

Marcia Lee Jordan, History & Latin American

Studies, Mobile, Alabama.

B A.'s are made by fools like me.

But only a maniac would go after a Ph.D.

Peggy Ann Koven, Spanish, North Miami,

Florida.

Catherine Ann Lampard, Anthropology, New
Orleans.

Tupper McClure Lampton, Sociology, Colum-
bia, Mississippi.

Lucy Ellen Lane, Art History, Jonesboro, Ar-
kansas.

Sandra Stream Lawry, Psychology, New Or-
leans.

Leslie Ann Lewis, English, Salt Lake City.
Utah

Marguerite Crow Lewis, French. Bryan, Texas.
GeLone DuConge 'Lombard, Sociology, New

Orleans

Karen Suzanne Manemann, French. Blloxi,

Mississippi

Sandra Kay Mansour, French, Chicago, Illi-
nois.

Linda Miriam Mauskopf, English, Portsmouth,

Virginia

Mary Anne McAlpin, English, Gulf Breeze,

Florida.

Ann Marie McCormick, Sociology, Gulfport,
Mississippi.

Ann Prince Merritt, Anthropology, Baton

Rouge. Louisiana.

Jill Jacqueline Meyers. Political Science. New

York, New York.

Patricia Else Monaco, cum laude. German,
New Orleans.

Charlotte Giles Montague, English, Lookout
Mountain, Tennessee.

Margo Candace Moret, Sociology, Atlanta,
Georgia.

Eileen Dwyer Morris, Sociology, Denver, Co-
lorado.

Marcia Geraldine Mortensen, Economics,

Mobile, Alabama.

Carol Melinda Moss, Art History, New Orleans,

Phyllis Anne Murphy, American Studies, New

Orleans

Margaret Norman Musser, American Studies.
New Orleans

Elaine Elizabeth Noden, History, Largo,

Florida.

Mercedes Aline O'Connor, American Studies,

New Orleans.

Alice Roberta Oram, Political Science, Atlanta.
Georgia.

Susan Polack, French, Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Susan Lee Porter, cum laude. Art History.
Louisville, Kentucky.

Jacqueline Rice Pyle, Theatre. Richmond.
Virginia.

Pamela Anne Reich, Sociology, Jacksonville,

Florida

Ann Leary RInes, English, New Orleans.

Virginia Anne Riser, Art History, LaPlace,

Louisiana

Deborah Ranler Roberts, History. Lake

Charles, Louisiana

Kathleen Louise Rogge, History & Political

Science, New Orleans

Eleanor Catherine Rose, cum laude. Art His-
tory. New Orleans

Anne Wllensky Schneider, English, Miami,

Florida

Nancy Jo Schwartz, English. Nashville. Geor-
gia.
Shelley Agatha Scott, Spanish. El Paso. Texas.

Shelley Ann Seaman, Music. Midland. Texas.
Pamela Jayne Shaw, Anthropology. Pitts-
burgh, Pennsylvania.

Donna Shierlock, Psychology. Fort Lauderdale.

Florida.

Cynthia Renee Shoss, cum laude. English,
Cape Giradeau, Missouri.

Marian Lenore Shostrom, History. River

Forest, Illinois.

Donna Frances Sir, History, Fayetteville, Ten-
nessee.

Sharman Sue Smith, Psychology, Coral

Gables, Florida

Peggy Weil Steine, English, Nashville. Ten-
nessee.

Carole Elizabeth Swanay, English, Huntsville,

Alabama.

Edith Susan Tabor, cum laude. Anthropology,

Tylertown, Mississippi.

Betty Sue Talbot, Philosophy. Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Men must demonstrate the qualities of hu-
man-ness to other men so that they will feel
comfortable in their human nature. For in his
nature is man's power, and in his ineptness
with it is his downfall.

Men must be taught to be social beings. This

/ PACE 53

is a responsibility of man to man. But— the
individual as a curious, groping living, excit-
able, fearing, hoping, artistic, mystical, absurd,
laughing creature is the most important ele-
ment in the earthly universe.
Justine Tally, cum laude, Spanish, Gadsden,
Alabama.

Shelby Lowrey Tomlinson, History, Burnt
Corn, Alabama.

Laura Anne Turnbull, Art, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Stephanie Lynn Twilbeck, Anthropology, New
Orleans.

Ara Pat Vidos, American Studies, Lake
Charles, Louisiana.

Caroline Charlene Vincent, Anthropology,
Chatsworth, California.
Joan Dauterive Vinot, English, New Orleans.
Anna Gwendolyn Wade, cum laude. Political
Science, El Dorado, Arkansas.
Susan Wagner, French, Dallas, Texas.
Sandra Alice Walker, English, New Orleans.
Deborah Gardner Whalley, History, Tulsa, Ok-
lahoma.

Jane Cassandra Wheeler, English, Orlando,
Florida.

Newcomb is like New Orleans— interesting and
different because of its faults— both places are
unique. I would not have wanted to go to
school anywhere else.
Alice Herlihy Wilbert, History, New Orleans.
Cindy Felice Wile, cum laude, English, Glen-
coe, Illinois.

Gwendolyn Baptiste Williams, Sociology, New
Orleans.

Linda Cheryl Willis, English, New Orleans.
Tamara Alicia Winter, English, Plainview,
Texas.

Carolyn Shaddock Woosley, cum laude. His-
tory, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
Carol Mossy York, French, Houston, Texas.
Susan Meryl Zelinger, Spanish, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia.

[*see pg. 18]

Constance Ann Zendel, History, Tuckahoe,
New York.
Each travels on a path that intersects with

many others
But no two ways run parallel for long
To accept this truth is to accept life itself
And to deny it is to be hurt at every parting.
Linda Lee Zisper, English, Tampa, Florida.

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE

Lynn Foster Freeman, magna cum laude.
Mathematics, New Orleans.
Jacqueline Friedman, magna cum laude. Bi-
ology, Houston, Texas.
Mary Edie Meredith, magna cum laude. Math-
ematics, Biloxi, Mississippi.
You're twenty or thirty years away from me
now, Meredith, you ole Hag. Don't go blaming
me for any of your sorrows, for it's not my
fault if you don't profit from my mistakes. Don't
thank me for your joys either, for happiness
is what you're making, not what you've had
or will have.

Deborah Gail Morris, magna cum laude, Biol-
ogy, Denver, Colorado.
Rose Marie Smith Strain, magna cum laude.
Psychology, Coral Gables, Florida.
Marcia Carol Spiegel, cum laude, with honors
in Biology, Miami, Florida.
Peggy Fridstein Gordon, with honors in Psy-
chology, New Orleans.
Juanita Marie Weisbach, with honors in Psy-
chology, Beaumont, Texas.
Claudette Renee Campbell, Mathematics,
Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Dale Marie Dane, Mathematics, New Orleans.
To Sophie Newcomb I must say
College was hard, I did play.

How I made it through, I'll never know.
But a B.S. in math I have to show.
Now I wish I could find a job!
Ann Boylston Farnell, Biology, Houston,
Texas.

Elaine Garcia, Psychology, Miami, Florida.
Barbara Dale Ginsburg, Biology, New Castle,
Pennsylvania.

Roberta Susan Gordon, Psychology, Miami,
Florida.

Gwendolyn Claire Hager, Psychology, Me-
tairie, Louisiana.

Deirdra Carlen Hill, Mathematics, Paoli,
Pennsylvania.

Jaclyn Dolton Hoelzer, Biology, New Orleans.
Nancy Goldstein Hoffman, Psychology, New
Orleans.

Rachelle Glenda Iteld, Psychology, Miami,
Florida.

Joan Laura Jackson, Biology, New Orleans.
Margaret Lamb Johnson, cum laude. Biology,
Alexandria, Virginia.

Stella Anne Jones, Chemistry, Memphis, Ten-
nessee.

May Kay, cum laude. Mathematics, New Or-
leans.

Aileen Marie Killgore, Psychology, Covington,
Louisiana.

Marion Leigh Malloy, Psychology, Cheraw,
South Carolina.

Laurel Lee Malowney, Mathematics, Tulsa,
Oklahoma.

Mary Barnes McKinney, Biology, Fort Worth,
Texas.

Mona Wilma Morgan, Mathematics, Gretna,
Louisiana.

Phyllis Jean Nugent, Psychology, Baytown,
Texas.

Muriel Signe Palmgren, Biology, Metairie,
Louisiana.

Nancy Ann Nelson Patterson, Biology, Hous-
ton, Texas.

Fay Aycock Riddle, cum laude. Mathematics,
Atlanta, Georgia.

Elizabeth Anderson Singleton, Psychology,
Galveston, Texas.

Trust in yourself above all things; Reality is
to be found in one's self.
CarolynRoseStallings, Biology, West Orange,
New Jersey.

Diane Lynn Stassi, Biology, New Orleans.
Susan Marie Stine, cum laude. Biology & Ger-
man, Miami, Florida.

Rometta Betti-Jean Thomas, Psychology, New
Orleans.

Barbara Kientz Thompson, Biology, New Or-
leans.

Fontaine Smith Wells, Mathematics, Montgo-
mery, Alabama.

Deidre Paige White, Psychology, Fayette, Ala-
bama.

Mildred Caroline Wiener, Psychology, Jack-
son, Mississippi.

Margaret Yanus, Biology, New Orleans.
In the beginning God created the heaven and
the earth.

And the earth was without form, and void; and
darkness was upon the face of the deep. And
the spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.

And God said. Let there be light: and there
was light.

—Genesis, I, 1-3

BACHELOR OF FINE ARTS

Barbara Ann Baer, magna cum laude, with -
honors in Art, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Marilyn O'Quinn Moore, magna cum laude,
with honors in Art, New Orleans.
Sallie Claire Lowenstein, magna cum laude,

Art, Bethesda, Texas.
Jann Terral Ferris, Art, New Orleans.
Susan Rhona Flamm, cum laude. Music, At-
lanta, Georgia.

"Thoughts on Tulane, a microcosm":
A mosaic of faces and beings, themes with
hundreds of variations, the frustration of
structures, the misdirection of psychic energy,
love's light lost, intensifications and distortions
of Living.

Marjorle Dorothy Fleischer, Art, Akron, Ohio.
MeredithAnnetteHarper,Art, Columbia, South
Carolina.

"If I expire without a name.
There'll be nobody else to blame.
I've gotta show them all just what I can do-
Make them stop hearing my name and asking

"Who?"
Haven't you wondered what happens to the

guys
Who just lean back and expect the Pulitzer

Prize?
Worshipful crowds at their door?
It's not that way any more!"
Henrietta Lucy Harwig, cum laude. Music,
Dallas, Texas.

Loraine Ann Lockwood, Art History, Briarcliff,
New York.

Margaret Joyce Miller, Music, Memphis, Ten-
nessee.

Patricia Eldridge Prins, Art, St. Louis, Missouri.
When I try to sit down and write about Tulane
or how Tulane has effected me after 3'/2 years
it only seems to come out sounding like a bad
epigram. Even in prose I find it very difficult
to distance myself sufficiently to reflect upon
my "educational environment" and say what
I really think about myself in relation to Tulane
and/or Tulane in relation to myself. What can
you say about a 21 -year-old girl who just grad-
uated?

Gail Anderson Singleton, Art, Galveston,
Texas.

One must learn to laugh at oneself. It is the
secret of all successful men and all happy
hearts. Life is a continuous learning process
— laugh — learn — love — lift — be receptive
to change and ride on.
Cynthia Anne Wegmann, Art History, New
Orleans.

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

BACHELOR OF ARTS

Melva H. Adam, Elementary Education, Lafitte,
Louisiana.

Reva Lupin Berins, Social Studies, New Or-
leans.

Alma Nydia Blasini, Spanish, Gretna, Loui-
siana.

Barbara Bouden, English, New Orleans.
Raymond Neil Calvert, English, New Orleans.
Amber Williams Chick, English, New Orleans.
Aletha Marie De Camp, Elementary Education,
Lafitte, Louisiana.

Jeremiah Duke, Science, New Orleans.
Bethany Baker Ewald, History, New Orleans.
Andree Cecile Gallicher, French, New Or-
leans.

Leslie Owen Hayes, English, Lafayette, Loui-
siana.

Priscilla Welch Hendren, Social Studies, Me-
tairie, Louisiana.

Karen Blomberg Jahncke, Spanish, New Or-
leans.

Rebecca Sue Kerlin, English, New Orleans.
Mays Lawrence Lacour, English, New Orleans.
Patrick Morrison McCausland, History, New
Orleans.

Lester Gerard Oufnac, Social Studies, New
Orleans.

PAGE 54 /

Betty Joyce Russell, English, New Orleans.
Edward Joseph Schaefer, English. New Or-
leans

Arllne Frohling Strelcher, English, Metalrie.
Louisiana,
Pierre Michel VIguerle, History. New Orleans.

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE

Lucas Joseph Bacino, Jr., Mathematics, Me-
taine, Louisiana

Marvin Edward Cooper, Mathematics, Me-
talrie, Louisiana.

Mary Carolyn McGehee Hermann, Biology,
New Orleans,

Carol Ruth Wendell HIrsch, Psychology, New
Orleans.

Dorothy Nyman La Borde, Biology, New Or-
leans.

Jose Antonio Ladra, Mathematics. New Or-
leans.

Edward Travis Lafferty. Mathematics. New
Orleans.

Robert Hale Reardon, Mathematics. New Or-
leans,

George Edward Shilllngton, Chemistry, Me-
talrie, Louisiana.

BACHELOR OF
BUSINESS STUDIES

Carmel Lucy Arthurs, New Orleans.
Stephen R. Berthelot, Luling, Louisiana
Henry Frederick Calongne, New Orleans.
Delia Ann Varn Drohan, Fort Meade, Florida.
Patrick Michael Jewett, New Orleans
Frank Ashley Jones, Jr., New Orleans.
Kurt Lange, Metalrie, Louisiana.
Lawrence Aymami Macaluso, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

George Newton McAlister, Jr., New Orleans.
Clarence E. Michel, New Orleans.
Donald W. Oliver, Slidell, Louisiana.
Donald John Radovlch, New Orleans.
Leonard Joseph Schwartz, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

BACHELOR OF
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY

Linda Joyce Gonzales, New Orleans.
Cheryl Ann Palmero, New Orleans.
Virginia Marie Schneldau, New Orleans.

BACHELOR OF ARTS

IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Linda Brown Bower, Metairie. Louisiana.
Bartlett Edward Graves, Marshall. Texas,
George Joseph Ray, New Orleans.
Steven Edward Shaw, Houston, Texas.

SCHOOL OF
ARCHITECTURE

BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE

William Allen Baer, St Louis, Missouri
Loyas Rudolph Barton, Jr., Clewiston, Florida.
Jon Bloss Blehar, Dallas. Texas.
"Tulane is a multi-college university in the
classic sense, contributing to and benefiting
from the exciting cultural and intellectual en-
vironment of its home city. New Orleans. Loui-
siana, one of the most gracious of cities in
the United States. "—(Tulane University Bulle-
tin, 1971-1972)

James Roger Brown, Jr., Cohasset. Massa-
chusetts

Robert Thomas Campbell, New Orleans.
Michael Joseph Carboni, Metairie. Louisiana.
Perry Cecil Colield, Jr.. Jacksonville. Florida.
Wylle Patterson Dawson, Kirkwood. Missouri
If anything, college has taught me that we
really don't know what is happening and we're
all faking like hell to make it look good.
Manuel Antonio deLemos Zuazaga, Santurce.
Puerto Rico,

Robert Allen DeMarco, Schenectady, New
York.

Henry Charles Duplantler, Chalmetle, Loui-
siana.

Robert Frank Flack, New York. New York.
Jeffrey Michael Garth, Hicksville, New York
Lewis Adolphus Graeber, III, Marks, Missis-
sippi.

John Carl Hanna, Maplewood, Louisiana,
Christopher Murry Knight, Short Hills, New
Jersey.

It has been a memorable experience and for
that I am grateful.

Kenneth Charles Levine, Memphis, Tennes-
see.

Bruce George Levy, New Orleans.
Stephen Thomas Mann, Hempstead. Texas.
George Roland Miller, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Grover Ernest Mouton, III, Lafayette. Loui-
siana.

Michael David Nius, Louisville, Kentucky
Robert White Rich, Clarksdale, Mississippi.
James Carl Salmi, Denver, Colorado.
Mary du Bols Schaub, Gambrills, Maryland.
William Maurice Staley, Sherman Oaks, Cali-
fornia.

Randolph Figuero von Breymann Acosta, San
Jose, Costa Rica.

Ralph Eglin, Wafer, Shreveport, Louisiana.
. . . it's . . . been a long train ride, but I've
enjoyed it. Peace and love to everybody.

Bessie Campbell Wyman, West Point. Missis-
sippi.

SCHOOL OF
ENGINEERING

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE
IN ENGINEERING

Michael Neal Bolton, with honors in Electrical
Engineering, Houston, Texas.
David Alfred Castanon, with honors in Elec-
trical Engineering, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Christopher James Church, with honors in
Engineering Curriculum, Fort Worth, Texas,
To Dr, Karlem Reiss, Advisor to Fraternities:
How about initiating a new fraternity for all
those graduates who:

1. have received no forms of financial aid
and have paid their bills promptly for four
years,

2. have lived in Tulane dormitories for four
years.

3. have eaten Bruff Commons' cooking for
four years.

But would I be the only one to qualify?
Lionel Michael Cobo, with honors in Engi-
neering Curriculum, Key West, Florida.
Pearl Mesta Award, 4

Michael Browning Farnell, with honors in
Chemical Engineering, Mobile, Alabama.
Robert Louis Mendow, with honors in Elec-
trical Engineering. New Orleans.
David Addison Miles, with honors in Engi-
neering Curriculum. Orange Park, Florida.
"There is nothing so stupid as an educated
man, if you get off the thing he was educated
in,"— Will Rogers

Richard Edgar Strain, Jr., with honors in Engi-
neering Curriculum, New Orleans.
To my wife Rose Mane Smith Strain— you have
too many names Smckoo.
To the ladies in the Dean of Engineering's
Office, thank you.

To George Webb, thanks for the advice.
Samuel Joseph Tilden, with honors in Chemi-
cal Engineering, New Orleans.
Matthew Anderson, IV, Civil Engineering,
Miami. Florida.

. . . this time we almost made the pieces fit,

didn't we'' Didn't we

William Richard Burk, III, Civil Engineering,
New Orleans

Joseph Charles Call, Civil Engineering, Me-
tairie, Louisiana

Relnaldo Castillo-Vargas, Chemical Engi-
neering, Palmares, Ala)uela, Costa Rica.
Ernesto Raul Cespedes, Electrical Engi-
neering, New Orleans

Gerald Edward Champagne, Mechanical En-
gineering, New Orleans
Will Gibbons Charbonnet, Civil Engineering,
New Orleans

Tilden Lafayette Childs, III. Electrical Engi-
neering. Fort Worth. Texas.
Cary Stephen Comarda, Mechanical Engi-
neering. New Orleans

Richard Charles Dusang, Civil Engineering.
Chalmette. Louisiana.

Michael Rhett Engler, Civil Engineering.
Corpus Christi, Texas

Lansing Brumley Evans, Electrical Engi-
neering, Katonah. New York.
Edwin Mark Evers, Chemical Engineering,
New Orleans

Carr Lee Fletcher, Mechanical Engineering,
Fort Lauderdale. Florida.
Patrick Cook Flower, Civil Engineering, New
Orleans,

David Fontaine. Ill, Chemical Engineering.
New Orleans

Antonio Ernesto Friguls-Casas, Civil Engi-
neering. Rio Piedras. Puerto Rico.
God grant me the serenity to accept the things

I cannot change . . ,
Courage to change the things I can . . .
And wisdomto know the difference.
Hugh Henry Fuller, III, Mechanical Engi-
neering, Spanish Fort, Alabama.
Daniel Paul Garcia, Electrical Engineering.
Chalmette. Louisiana.

Robert M. Greene, Engineering Curriculum.
Lincolnwood, Illinois

Douglas Reid Grogan. Jr.. Engineering Cur-
riculum, Irving, Texas,

Gerald William Hanafy, Civil Engineering. New
Orleans.

Michael Francis Hein, Civil Engineering. Arabi.
Louisiana.

Stephen James Huffman, Civil Engineering
(Conferred Posthumously). Kenner. Louisiana.
Robert Lee Hyman. Engineering Curriculum,
Mobile. Alabama.

Wayne Daniel Johnston, Electrical Engi-
neering. New Orleans.

Morgan Andrew Jones, Engineering Curricu-
lum. Abilene. Texas.

Steven William Kimble, Engineering Curricu-
lum. Metairie. Louisiana.
"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the
shadow of Death.

I will fear no evil; for I am the evilesi son of
a bitch in the valley, " Vietnam. C. 1965
For the Seniors, from an anonymous author:
"Education is what you have left over when
you have forgotten everything you have
learned," Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. I4lh
Ed. p 1104 b

Julian Charles Koch, Electrical Engineering,
Birmingham, Alabama.

/ PACE 55

Jimmy Dale Koontz, Engineering Curriculum,
Hobbs, New Mexico.

John Walter Krupsky, Electrical Engineering,
New Orleans.

Robert Alan Kurlander, Mechanical Engi-
neering, Beachwood, Ohio.
John Peter Lalwrde, Civil Engineering, New
Orleans.

Waiter Michael Lamia, Engineering Curricu-
lum, New Orleans.

". . . and so it ends, not with a bang but with
a whimper, and a lingering, chaffing doubt-
now that it's over, have I got what I came to
seek, or has the search taken on new possi-
bilities not considered before, so that it is with
reluctance rather than enthusiasm that I must
forsake the hunt just when I've gotten a
glimpse of the White Rabbit's tail? . . . ."
Thomas Edward Laza, Electrical Engineering,
Dayton, Texas.

Steven John Hoa LeBlanc, Civil Engineering,
New Orleans.

Daniel Montgomery Lewis, Jr., Engineering
Curriculum, New Orleans.
I would like to thank my mother for getting
her little son into Tulane and also for loving
me so much. Also, I would like to thank Dean
Martinez for his kind assistance throughout my
four years. If it wasn't for him, I probably would
have ended up at L.S.U.N.O. Finally, I would
like to thank all the brothers in A.T.O. for four
wonderful years.

Theodore William Long, Mechanical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Michael Brian Maher, Chemical Engineering,
Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Luis Fernando Maldonado, Mechanical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Paul Joseph Mallon, Chemical Engineering,
Roselle, New Jersey.

Hugh Provosty Manson, Engineering Curricu-
lum, New Orleans.

Hugh Joseph McClain, Jr., Chemical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

"Universities become such great storehouses
of knowledge because the freshmen enter with
so much and the seniors leave with so little."
William Mossman McCray, Electrical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

John Hilary Morris, Chemical Engineering,
Butte, Montana.

John Edward Mueller, Mechanical Engi-
neering, Prairie Village, Kansas.
Joel Hersh Penick, Electrical Engineering,
Miami, Florida.

An electrical engineering department, which
fails to give its students a clear view of their
responsibilities to employers, the environment,
and themselves and which fails to instill in its
students basic self confidence, does not de-
serve to be called an electrical engineering
school and should be eliminated from the
Tulane University system.
David de Jesus Perez-Arrifola, Electrical En-
gineering, Park Side, Puerto Rico.
Leon Ronald Pesses, Electrical Engineering,
New Orleans.

Maurice Joseph Picheloup, IV, Mechanical
Engineering, Metairie, Louisiana.
George Panagiotis Plakotos, Electrical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Thomas Anthony Planchard, Electrical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Dudley Cole Richter, Civil Engineering, Miami,
Florida.

Dennis Lee Riddle, Mechanical Engineering,
Monono, Wisconsin.

Douglas Rufus Robinson, Engineering Curric-
ulum, Houston, Texas.

Roger Weldon Schramm, Engineering Curric-
ulum, Houston, Texas.

Christopher Robert Sheridan, Jr., Civil Engi-
neering, Macon, Georgia.

Ted Stephen Silver, Engineering Curriculum,
Miami, Florida.

Thomas Saunders Smith, Electrical Engi-
neering, Houston, Texas.
Carlos Francisco Suarez, Chemical Engi-
neering, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
I believe I have received very much from Tu-
lane in only two years: A B.S. and a wife.
Philip Charles Sutherling, Mechanical Engi-
neering, Norfolk, Virginia.
Steven Richard Szymurski, Mechanical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Thomas William Twiford, Jr., Mechanical En-
gineering, Houston, Texas.
Tulane, home of the Wave, Hullabaloo, Free
flick. Jamb, Herbie, Bruff, C. R., Rat, Cafeteria,
Scruton, Eddie's, Whopper, Yuk, Mushroom.
SOS, DSD (?), Yats, Quarter, Dixie, Newcomb
lovelies, and all other pleasantries of N.O.
What more could one ask?
Stephen James Walton, Civil Engineering,
Metairie, Louisiana.

Victor Martin Walz, Jr., Electrical Engineering,
Merritt Island, Florida.

Richard Brooke Wavell, Engineering Curricu-
lum, Winter Park, Florida.
Douglass John Williams, Civil Engineering,
Eustis, Florida.

If you don't know how to lose you don't deserve
to win.

Jimmy Allen Yarter, Mechanical Engineering,
Bellaire, Texas.

An old Indian once said— When a man's heart
is on fire, sparks fly out of his mouth— GO TO
HELL LSU.

MASTER OF ENGINEERING

Carl Frederick Will, Mechanical Engineering,
New Orleans.

MASTER OF
OPERATIONS RESEARCH

Dan Spence Grimes, Winchester, Indiana.
Cornelius Cole Holcomb, Jr., New Orleans.

THE GRADUATE

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION

MASTER OF

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

James William Armbruster, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael Henry Barnes, Oklahoma City, Okla-
homa.

Stephen Anthony Brinkman, Tyler, Texas.
Jerome Thomas Broussard, St. Martinville,
Louisiana.

Glenn Philip Carson, LaJunta, Colorado.
John Martin Caldwell, St. Louis, Missouri.
Charles Burton Clark, Anniston, Alabama.
Louis Holt Cloud, Birmingham, Alabama.
Joseph Christian Conrad, Fairfax, Virginia.

Charles Reems Daul, Convent Station, New
Jersey.

Jean-Pierre de Cormis, Paris, france.
Ralph Francis Felder, Beaumont, Texas.
Michael Ferman, St. Louis, Missouri.
Dennis Don Rint, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
John Roderick Flint, Richmond, Virginia.
Merle Freitag, Huron, South Dakota.
George Nunzio Giacoppe, Fitchburg, Massa-
chusetts.

Eugene Albert Grasser, Jr., New Orleans.
Forrest Virgil Graves, Garden Grove, Califor-
nia.

Noel Delmas Gregg, Butler, Tennessee.
Jack Henry Griffith, Jr., San Antonio, Texas.
Dan Spence Grimes, Winchester, Indiana.
Howard Hamilton Hampton, II, Lakewood, Co-
lorado.

Eugene Harrison, Springfield, Mis-

Kent Hartman, Lancaster, Pennsyl-

South

Willard

souri.

Jeffrey

vania.

George Philip Higdon, Jr., Charleston,
Carolina.

Oliver Armstrong Hord, Jr., Hattiesburg, Mis-
sissippi.

John Clinton House, Robersonville, North
Carolina.

Leamon Eugene Howell, Live Oak, Florida.
William McCaw Hughes, Jr., Morgantown,
West Virginia.

Johnnie Morgan Jackson, Jr., Hampton, Vir-
ginia.

Allen Corson Jaggard, Pitman, New Jersey.
James Franklin Jancik, Caldwell, Texas.
Jerry Wayne Johnston, Hopkinsville, Ken-
tucky.

Owen Lambert Jones, Jr., New Orleans.
William Adrian Jones, Los Angeles, California.
Peter David Kanwit, Fairfax, Virginia.
August Leander Keyes, Torrington, Wyoming.
William Leonard Klinkenstein, Miami, Florida.
Edward Murphy Knoff, Jr., Memphis, Tennes-
see.

Julio Rot>erto Lago, New Orleans.
Bruce Thomas Lammers, Baxter Springs,
Kansas.

Robert Marion Leaman, New Orleans.
Albert Regis Lepage, Auburn, Maine.
Charles Michael Levy, New Orleans.

Leonard Thomas Lilliston, Jr., Onancock, Vir-
ginia.

Paul Francis Livaudais, Metairie, Louisiana.
David James Manifold, Leiand, Mississippi.
James Paul Martinek, Lyons, Illinois.
Michael Josef Matt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
George Arthur McCammon, Jr., Springfield,
Illinois.

Russell Francis Moon, New Orleans.
James Marshal Moorehead, New Orleans.
Gerard Morales, Miami, Florida.
James Francis Mullen, Quincy, Massachu-
setts.

Nihat A. Ozan, Istanbul, Turkey.
Adelma Lucy Park, Nyack, New York.
Melvin Claude Payne, Jr., Newton, Mississippi.
James Marvin Peoples, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jose Manuel de Olim Perestrelo, Niteroi, Bra-
zil.

Walter Leo Perry, Salem, New Hampshire.
Clement Francis Perschall, Jr., New Orleans.
Nancy Bailey Pinson, Greensboro, North
Carolina.

John Leo Rafferty, Scranton, Pennsylvania.
Charles Francis Bradford Reynolds, Fort
Smith, Arkansas.

Jackson Stephens Robbins, Birmingham,
Alabama.

Charles Howard Roeder, New Ulm, Minnesota.
Jorge Alberto Sarria, Harahan, Louisiana.
Jorge Alberto Sarria, Bogota, Columbia.
Melvin Edward Schick, Jr., Elgin, Illinois.
Richard Lawrence Simmons, Wyoming, Ohio.
Earnest David Simshauser, Slidell, Louisiana.
William Edward Snell, Jr., Vineland, New Jer-
sey.

John Elbert Stack, III, Meridian, Mississippi.
Joanne Ruth Sterbenz, New Orleans.
Dexter Stevens, III, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

PAGE 56 /

David Cameron Tatom, Dothan, Alabama.
Gerardo ten Brink, Houston, Texas.
Tommy Lee Trumbie, III, Lumberton. Missis-
sippi,

Kenard Newton Turpin, Hi, Miami, Florida.
Donald Hugh Tyler, Watonga, Oklahoma.
Jay Eldon Vaughn, Maryville. Oregon.
Gerald Pini<ham Ward, Oil City, Pennsylvania.
William Howard Willoughby, Jr., Ventura. Ca-
lifornia.

Wayne Joseph Wilson, New Orleans
Marc Georges Zavadil, Geneva. Switzerland
Robert William Zllle, Jr., New Orleans.

THE SCHOOL OF LAW

JURIS DOCTOR

Hertjert Roman Alexander, Jr., New Iberia,
Louisiana.

William Travis Allison, New Orleans.
Harry Stiles Anderson, Clarksdale, Mississippi.
Wolfgang Paul Andersson, New Orleans
Alvin Lee Andrews, Davison, Michigan.
Alexander Raymond Ashy, II, Eunice, Loui-
siana.

Philip Leslie Azar, Jr., Belleville. Illinois.
Denis Gerard Bandera, New Orleans.
Thomas Barr, IV, New Orleans
Keith Edward Bell, Sharon, Pennsylvania.
Leonard Marty Berins, New York, New York
Henry Bernstein, New Orleans.
Ronald Joseph Bertrand, Lake Charles, Loui-
siana.

Jacques Francois Bezou, New Orleans.
Ricardo Antonio Bilonici<-Paredes, Panama,
Republic Of Panama.

Frederick Alexander Blanche, III, Baton
Rouge. Louisiana.

Harold Martin Block, Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Jerald Paul Block, Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Alan Bart Bookman, New Orleans.
Gerald Arthur Bosworth, Thibodaux, Loui-
siana.

Leonard Nicholas Bouzon, Metal rie, Loui-
siana.

John Jacob Broders, New Orleans.
William Edward Brown, Rochester, New York
Robert Reisch Casey, New Orleans
Edward Joseph Castaing, Jr., New Orleans.

Hugh Erskine Cherry, Anderson. Indiana.
Richard Kearney Christovich, New Orleans.
Rutledge Carter Clement, Jr., Danville, Vir-
ginia

Timothy Kimball Cloudman, New Orleans.
David Alfred Combe, New Orleans.
Michael Duson Cossey, New Orleans.
Ronald David Cox, Napoleonville, Louisiana.
David Frederick Craig, Jr., New Orleans.
George Paull Crounse, Jr., Paducah, Ken-
tucky.

William Bertram DeMars, Jr., Casper, Wyom-
ing.

John Michael Devlin, Houston, Texas.
Dee Dodson Drell, New Orleans
Michael Thomas Ellas, Laurel. Mississippi.
Peter Everett, iV, New Orleans.
James Panfield Farwell, New Orleans.
Grey Flowers Ferris, Vicksburg. Mississippi.
Michael Kevin Rtzpatrick, New Orleans.
Rueben Isidore Friedman, New Orleans.
Anita Hamann Ganucheau, New Orleans.
David Norman Gillis, Fayette. Mississippi.
Edith Rhodes Gomes, New Orleans.
Joseph Bailey Grant, Monroe, Louisiana.
Robert Morris Green, New Orleans.
John Clifford Grout, Jr., New Orleans.

Charles Carr Grubb, Metairie. Louisiana.
Charles Byron Hahn, Jr., North Augusta, South
Carolina.

Harry Simms Hardin, III, New Orleans.
Benjamin Franklin Hatfield, Indianapolis, In-
diana.
James Alison Hayes, Lafayette, Louisiana.

Robert Matlock Hearing, Jr., Jackson, Missis-
sippi.

Joseph Harrison Henderson, III, Alexandria,

Louisiana.

John Sharp Holmes, Jr., Yazoo City, Missis-
sippi.

Michael Lawrence Hughes, Grand island,
Florida.

Henry Joseph Jumonville, III, New Orleans.
James George Kambur, New Orleans.
Peter Crump Keenan, New Orleans.
David Arthur Kerstein, Eunice. Louisiana.
Harold Beryl Kushner, Montgomery, Alabama.
John Luther Landrem, Jr., Shreveport, Loui-
siana,
Charles Eustace Leche, New Orleans.

Robert Allen Lee, Metairie, Louisiana.
Sergio Alfredo Leiseca, Jr., Bethesda, Mary-
land

Joel Phillip Loeffelholz, New Orleans.
Geoffrey Herr Longenecker, New Orleans.
Robert Murray Mahony, Chappaqua, New
York

John Poston Manard, Jr., New Orleans.
David Anthony Marceilo, Thibodaux. Loui-
siana.

Ira Jeffrey Marcus, Chicago. Illinois.
Louis Herman Marrero, IV, New Orleans.
Jon Grant Massey, Jackson. Mississippi.
Earl Raymond McCallon, III, Metairie. Loui-
siana.

Edward Joseph McCloskey, New Orleans.
Kenneth Edward Meyer, Shaker Heights, Ohio.
Malcolm Andrew Meyer, New Orleans.
Philip Montelepre, New Orleans.
Brainerd Spencer Montgomery, Jr., New Or-
leans.

Wllbert Evans Noel, New Orleans.
David Oestrelcher, II, Salisbury. North Caro-
lina.

Michael Roy O'Keefe, ill. New Orleans
Chester Allen Parker, III, Orlando, Florida
Joseph Leon Parkinson, Blackfoot. Idaho.
Lyie Franklin Parratt, Jr., Metairie, Louisiana,
Lyie Robert Phillpson, New Orleans
Donald Joseph PIckney, New Orleans.
Johnny Atton Polndexter, Houston. Texas.
Ronald Gordon Poquette, Eau Claire. Wiscon-
sin.

Lionel Franklin Price, Slidell. Louisiana.
Wallace Clarke Quinn, New Orleans.
Clayton Gethin Ramsey, Monticello. Georgia
Tulane? ... Gaveaf emptor.
AI>bott Jay Reeves, Providence. Rhode Island.
Margaret Maraist RItchey, Morgan City. Loui-
siana.

James Henry Ross, Jr., Burlington, North
Carolina.

Edwin Otto Schiesinger, New Orleans.
John Garic Schoen, Jr., New Orleans.
Philipp Albert Seelig, New Orleans.
Stephen Bennett Sharber, Mayfield. Kentucky.
Patrick Roy Sheldon, Huntsville. Alabama
Donald Alan Shindler, New Orleans
Irving Bernard Shnalder, New Orleans
Stephen Gerard Sklamba, Metairie. Louisiana.
Diane Wllp Spies, Mandeville. Louisiana.

*i«ii«

/ PAGE 57

John Stephen Steiner, University City, Mis-
souri.

Helen Ludeweka Sullivan, Shreveport, Loui-
siana.

Judy Nicholas Tabb, New Orleans.

Walter Chlllingworth Thompson, Jr., Harahan,

Louisiana.

Max N. Tobias, Jr., New Orleans.

Louis Bartholomew Trenchard, III, New Or-
leans.

Robert Collins Vallee, New Orleans.
Jeffrey Paul Victory, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Ralph Shirley Whalen, Jr., Lake Charles, Loui-
siana.

James Logan Wheeler, New Orleans.
William Hobart White, Jr., Terre Haute, In-
diana.

John Courtney Wilson, Metairle, Louisiana.
■Michael Philip Wolfson, New Orleans.

MASTER OF CIVIL LAW

Horacio Fernando Alfaro Arosemena, Pan-
ama, Republic of Panama.

MASTER OF LAWS

Tran Huu Dinh, Saigon, Vietnam.
Francois Jouvel, Marseille, France.
Sanguan Lewmanomont, Bangkok, Thailand.
Francolse Peccoud, Chambery, France.
Henricus Johannes Maria van Bronkhurst,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

SCHOOL OF MEDICINE

DOCTOR OF MEDICINE
WITH HONORS

Richard Thomas Anderson, New Orleans.
Thomas Brandt Anderson, Moorhead, Min-
nesota.

Isaac William Browder, New York, New York.
Ronald Wilfred Busuttil, Temple Terrace,
Florida.

Clifford Loren Coleman, New Orleans.
Robert Joseph Kaminski, Lafayette, Louisiana.
Glenn Earl Lambert, Jr., New Orleans.
Douglass Mann Landwehr, New Orleans.
Robert Alan Lipson, North Miami Beach,
Florida.

Jack Colbert Morgan, III, Stratford, Texas.
Arthur Joseph Nussbaum, Alison Parks,
Pennsylvania.

William Ellis O'Mara, Jackson, Mississippi.
DOCTOR OF MEDICINE

John Frazier Alston, Cedarburg, Wisconsin.

Roger Michael Anastasio, Hamden, Connec-
ticut.

Charles Russell Anderson, Denver, Colorado.

Winston L. Anderson, Jr., Winchester, Kansas.

Laurence Warren Arend, Austin, Texas.

Hendrick Jackson Arnold, III, Arkadelphia,
Arkansas.

Ronald Neel Barbie, St. Peters, Missouri.
Stephen Phillips Binns, Sarasota, Florida.
Jerome Scott Blackman, Roslyn, New York.
Phyllis Suzanne Wiggers Blackwell, Dubach,
Louisiana.

Steven Jeffrey Blackwell, New York, New
York.

David Warren Bonham, Enid, Oklahoma.

James Stewart Bonnet, Jr., Lafayette, Loui-
siana.

Archie Watt Brown, Jr., Morgantown, North
Carolina.

Sherman Ira Brown, Van Nuys, California.
George Evans Burgess, III, New Orleans.
Harry Joseph Cazzola, Albuquerque, New
Mexico.

Joseph Alan Chipella, Chico, California.
George Jenhua Chu, Hong Kong.
Dellie Howard Clark, Jr., Rosefield, Louisiana.
Stephen Riley Cochran, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Gloria Battle Coker, Metairle, Louisiana.
Kenneth Lee Combs, Lexington, Kentucky.
John Charles Curtiss, Port Arthur, Texas.
Gary Jude Danos, Metairle, Louisiana.
Rise Delmar, New York, New York.
Dalton Evan Diamond, Sardis, Mississippi.
Jon Hope Edwards, San Angelo, Texas.
David Martin Elwonger, Victoria, Texas.
Today is the first day of the rest of my lite.
Gary Robert Epier, Bozeman, Montana.
Reavis Thayer Eubanks, Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Richard Arthur Evans, Houston, Texas.
Michael Charles Finn, Washington, District of
Columbia.

Jack Fleet, Jacksonville, Florida.
Barry Dean Frame, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jan Marshall Friedman, Alton, Illinois.
Marc Phillip Friedman, Metairle, Louisiana.
Gail Marie Fuller, Salem, Oregon.
Lawrence Jay Galinkin, Flushing, New York.
Michael Lawrence Galligan, Canton, Minne-
sota.

Peter Michael Goldman, West Orange, New
Jersey.

Miles Jay Graber, New York, New York.
Sandra Shroder Graber, New Orleans.
Jay Frederick Grimaldi, Citrus Heights, Cali-
fornia.

Charles George Haddad, Metairle, Louisiana.
Richard Allen Hall, Jeffersonville, Illinois.
Charles Robinson Hanes, III, Mobile. Alabama.
George Marion Harris, Jr., Laurel, Mississippi.
William Wallace Helvie, Caracas, Venezuela.
Jeremiah Henry Holleman, Jr., Columbus,
Mississippi.

James David Hooker, Hobbs, New Mexico.
Randolph Michael Howes, Ponchatoula, Loui-
siana.

Walter Simeon James, III, Moultrie, Georgia.
John Blassingame Johnston, St. George,
South Carolina.

John Marcus Jones, Houston, Texas.
Gerald Feitel Joseph, Jr., Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Alan Scott Kellermann, New Orleans.
James Driscoll Knoepp, Alexandria, Loui-
siana.

Conrad Krebs, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Iris Marie Krupp, New Orleans.
Ivri Matthew Kumin, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Wayne Fox Larrabee, Jr., Omaha, Nebraska.
Charles John Lilly, Jr., New Orleans.
Charles Gordon Long, Tallahassee, Florida.
Alfred Carl Lotman, Short Hills, New Jersey.
Donald Clifton Luebke, New Orleans.
Arthur Morris Matthews, Jr., Gulfport, Missis-
sippi.

Richard Herman May, San Antonio, Texas .

John Scott McCabe, Ellensburg, Washington.

Thomas Caryle McLure, III, Alexandria, Loui-
siana.

James Thomas McQuitty, Jr., New Orleans.

Jay Leonard Merten, Monroe, Louisiana.
Floyd Paul Meyer, Jr., Elmgrove, Wisconsin.
Bruce Paul Meyers, Bloomfield, Iowa.
Michael Rex Moore, West Plains, Missouri.
Theodore Albertus Moore, III, Minden, Loui-
siana.

James Andrew Morock, Alexandria, Louisiana.
Harold Roland Neely, Albuquerque, New Me-
xico.

Dale Edward Nickel, Shatter, California.
Peter Gregers Nielsen, Bakersfield, California.
James Wright Northington, Florence, Ala-
bama.

Daonald Nathan Novick, Akron, Ohio.
Raymond Latanae Parker, Jr., Miami, Florida.
I would like to thank all those who have helped
me during these past four years, especially
my close friends. I hope now that from this
the beginning of my medical career to the end
I will remain dedicated to the betterment of
my fellow man.

Michael Joseph Raybeck, Danbury, Connec-
ticut.

John Edward Rea, III, Norman, Oklahoma.
Joseph John Roniger, Jr., New Orleans.
Robert Edward Roybal, Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

James George Sallfield, Toledo, Ohio.
Randolph Cochrane Seybold, Houston, Texas.
Robert Harris Shaw, Houston, Texas.
James Mason Shelley, Jr., Pensacola, Florida.
Howel William Slaughter, Jr., Mobile, Ala-
bama.

James Reilly Smith, Houston, Texas.
Joseph David Sosnow, Freeport, New York.
Andrea Lynn Starrett, East Point, Georgia.
Henry George Stelling, Jr., Atlanta, Georgia.
Tommy Ernest Swate, Cotton Valley, Loui-
siana.

Laurence Ken Tanaka, Bonita, California.
Thaddeus Lamar Teaford, Americus, Georgia.
"Coo Coo and Twitty" April 17, 1971; A Fan-
tastic Happening and the Beginning of a Won-
derful Experience.

William Horace Thompson, Jr., West Co-
lumbus, South Carolina.
Paul Andrew Tibbits, New Orleans.
Awaken early,
To lengthen life's day.

Timothy Junius Triche, Dearborn, Michigan.
Lawrence Dashiell True, Washington, District
of Columbia.

Jeffery James Tucker, Houston, Texas.
John Schuyler Van Bodegem, Portland, Ore-
gon.

Max Frederick Van Gilder, Paris, Illinois.
William Michael Walsh, Decatur, Georgia.
Richard Edward Ward, New Orleans.
Thomas Oliver Wildes, Rice Lake, Wisconsin.
David Lindsey Wolf, Tyler, Texas.
John Arthur Youngberg, Concord, California.

SCHOOL OF
PUBLIC HEALTH AND
TROPICAL MEDICINE

MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH

James Harold Ammons, Montgomery, Ala-
bama.

Richard Ralph Ashbaugh, New Orleans.
Richard Paul Brown, Gretna, Louisiana.
Joseph Donaldson Buck, New Orleans.

PAGE 58 /

Daisy Greenwood Campbell, Metairie, Loui-
siana

Stuart Alan Capper, Silver Spring, Maryland
Robert Paul Caudlll, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee
Bundit Ctiunhaswasdikul, Bangkok, Thailand.
William Stephen Collins, Devon, Connecticut
RadclKfe John Coyle, Giendale, California.
John Emanuel Cutts, Mobile, Alabama.
Anne Mae Doran, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Therese Luclta Paget, New Orleans.
Beverly Bernadetle Fasulio, New Orleans.
Carole Nancy Furman, Miami, Florida.
Walter Daniel Galanowsky, Clifton, New Jer-
sey.

Bachtlar GIntIng, Bindjai. Sumatera, Indone-
sia.

Nydia Helena Gordillo-Gomez, Cordoba, Ar-
gentina.

Judy Willis Gulllory, New Orleans
Dan Edward Hammack, Hemet, California.
Barbara Parrlsh Hanks, Metairie, Louisiana.
Stalin Hardin, Sarawak, East Malaysia.
John Allen Harrel, Jr., Little Rock, Arkansas.
Ella Mae Herriage, Lubbock, Texas.
Bui The Hoanh, Thi Nghe. Saigon, Vietnam.
Philip Webb Laird, Jackson, Mississippi.
James Anthony Lobo, Maharasthra, India.
Margaret Anne Neveux, New Orleans

George Wesley Newburn, Jr., Mobile, Ala-
bama.

Thassanee Pornpiboon Nuchprayoon, Bang-
kok, Thailand.

Uton Mughtar Rafel, Bandung, Thailand.
George Lawrence SandKer, Columbia, South
Carolina.

Vernon Donald Selfert, New Orleans.
Sue Ann Boynton Servoss, Lincolnwood, Illi-
nois.

Edgar Haviland Sllvey, Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Sanguan Sirinam, Songkhla, Thailand
Dolores Vergeau Smiley, St. Louis, Missouri.
Joe Purser Smith, Jr., Fort Worth, Texas.
David Edgar Stewart, New Orleans.
Robert Fulton Stott, New Orleans.
Duong Trong Thieu, Saigon, Vietnam.
Florence M. Washington, New Orleans.
Adin Richard Webb, Concordia, Kansas.
Theodore Jay Weinberg, Springfield, Massa-
chusetts.

Peggy Louise Wheeler, Rock Glen, New York.
Joyce Otford Wildes, Rice Lake, Wisconsin.
Marc Jay Yacht, Norristown, Pennsylvania.

MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
AND TROPICAL MEDICINE

Helen F. Berquist, Youngstown, Ohio.
Wilfred Sei Boayue, Bunadee. Liberia.
Phaira) Desudchit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jagjeet Singh Gill, Kuala Lumpur, West Ma-
laysia.

Louis Fitzhenry James, Salt Lake City, Utah
Donald Carter Kaminsky, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Eliot Jacobs Peariman, Brookline, Massachu-
setts.

Somnuek Polcharoen, Bruket, Thailand.
Sarnt Sarntlnoranont, Utaradit, Thailand.
Rupert Kurt Splllmann, New Orleans
Sri Srinophakun, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kanchana Supanthuvanlch, Bangkok, Thai-
land.

Somchai Supanvanlch, Bangkok, Thailand
Cherdiarp Vasuvat, Bangkok, Thailand

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE

Holmes Byron Bryant, New Orleans.
James Edwin Burnham, Port Neches, Texas.
John DadlanI, Arlington, Virginia.
John Michael D'AntonI, New Orleans.
Earl Stanley Dobbs, New Orleans
Dennis Ralph GalatI, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Marilyn Esther Goodrich, Milledgeville, Geor-
gia.

Erna Hotmann HoHman, New Orleans.
Elster Joseph Laborde. Metairie, Louisiana.
Wayne Fox Larrabee, Jr., Omaha, Nebraska.
Mahmud Majanovic, Milledgeville, Georgia.
Eanix Poole, Grand Ridge, Florida.
Benjamin Martin Potier, Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Warren Caudlll Shumate, Tallahassee, Florida.
Emmanuel Ademola Smith, Suru Lere, Nigeria.
Peter Matthew Smith, Anchorage. Alaska.

DOCTOR OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE
Theodore Vance Crosiey, New Orleans.

SCHOOL OF
SOCIAL WORK

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK

Saul Joseph Addison, Hammond, Louisiana.
Jane Hannon Adkinson, Gainesville, Florida.
Linda Jean Agrlmson, San Francisco, Califor-
nia.

Kay Ann Appieman, Fort Worth, Texas.
Linda Eilzalieth Beckett, San Angelo, Texas.
Harry Peter Becnei, Jr., Baton Rouge, Loui-
siana.

Charles William Belsom, New Orleans.
Titus William Bender, Meridian, Mississippi.
Napoleon O. Benoit, New Orleans.
Maureen Heaiy Benson, Hampton, Virginia.

Bettye Gardner Bohannon, Arabi, Louisiana.

Sandra Ruth Bonner, Moultrie, Georgia.

James Carl Brandt, Denver, Colorado.

Josephine Schumacher Brown, Aberdeen,

South Dakota.

Susannah Simonis Brown, Saratoga, Califor-
nia.

Marta Rodriguez Carboneil, New Orleans

Carolyn Pullin Carpenter, Paris, Texas

Niels Kurt Christiansen, Rochester, New York.

Mary Constance Christopher, San Antonio,

Texas

DeElda Lou Cotanche, Panama City, Florida.

Martha Lee Coulter, Lafayette, Louisiana.

Claire Lee Courtney, Hammond, Louisiana.

Andrea Ayo Cox, New Orleans

Jean FIke Craig, Atlanta, Georgia.

Elaine Cunningham, New Orleans.

Dorothy Ann Day, Gretna, Louisiana.

George Robert Day, Tahlequah, Oklahoma.

Elolse Doxle Dixon, New Orleans.

Delbert Michael Dorn, New Orleans.

John David Du Pre,' Marietta, Georgia.

Joseph Donald Edwards, Jr., Orwigsburg,

Pennsylvania.

Priscllia Rivera de Engolla, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Frances ElizalDeth Evans, Fort Worth, Texas.

Curtis Henry Fiesel, Oregon City. Oregon.

Theodore Arthur Foster, Kenner, Louisiana.

Donald Ray Frederick, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Diana Marie Freeland, Houston, Texas.

Michael Thomas Patrick Gannon, San Fran-
cisco, California.

Joe Hardin Ganl, Adamsville. Tennessee.
William Thomas Gibson, Williamson, West

Virginia.

William Augustus Glllaspie, 111, Jupiter,

Florida

Evanne Tyndall Goode. Gretna. Louisiana.

Margaret Montgomery Groome, Greenville.

Mississippi

Melanle Jo Hamilton, Fayetteville, Tennessee.

Diane Kay Harder, Madison. Wisconsin.

Harold Louis Harris, Metairie, Louisiana.

Michelle Taylor Naught. Boise. Idaho

Jane Schacht Haydon, Erie, Pennsylvania.

Roberl James Hayward, Jr., Red Bank, New

Jersey.

Scott Harris Hershman, Brook, Indiana.
Thomas John Higgins, Avondale. Louisiana.
Susan Asdell Hogan. New Orleans.
Ellzat>eth Patricia Hottell, Louisville, Kentucky.
Kenneth Allan Jaye. Miami Beach, Florida.
David Harris Johnson, Delphi, Indiana.
Edna Wooten Johnson, Wetumpka. Alabama.
Patricia Birch Jones, Montgomery. Alabama.
Sarah Ann Joubert, Metairie. Louisiana.
Harry Dudley Joynton, Jr., New Orleans.
Karen Rae Kelley, Louisville, Kentucky.
Joseph Dee Kimbrell, Jr., Morgan City, Loui-
siana.

William Michael King, New Orleans.
Victoria Lee Kingdon, San Francisco, Califor-
nia.

William Frank Klock, New Orleans
Donna Pruett Kranzusch, New Orleans.
Gloria Dean Laster, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Constance Frances LaVine, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Beverly Bethune Lawson, New Orleans.
Carol Jeanne Lindsey, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Luther Clyde Lusk, Jr., New Orleans.
Patricia Ann Mackey, Metairie. Louisiana.
Ann Culligan Martin, Harahan, Louisiana.

Nancy Margaret McGeorge, Pine Bluff, Ar-
kansas.

Ruth Horton McWaters, Baton Rouge. Loui-
siana.

John Andrew Merrick, Arlington. Massachu-
setts.

Carol KIngsley Miller, Madison, Wisconsin.

Charles Joseph Monlezun, Gretna, Louisiana.

Jane Clark Moorman, Altavista, Virginia.

Carol Marie Murphy, Pensacola, Rorida.

Betty Moye Myers, Metairie, Louisiana.

Glenn Alford Noblin, Dallas. Texas.

Frances Fawcett Oliver. Savannah. Georgia.

Judith Rose Owen. Memphis. Tennessee.

Sherrill Lawson Owens, Dallas, Pennsylvania.

Holley Durant Pavy. New Orleans.

Paul J. Peterson, Lehi, Utah.

Richard Nelson Potter, New Orleans.

Barbara Hurd Powell, Janesville, Wisconsin.

Howard Alvln Powell, Wheeling. West Virginia.

John Ray Powers, Jr., Baton Rouge. Louisiana.

Gordon Alfred Raley, Carthage. Texas.

Maureen Ellen Reardon, Youngston. Ohio.

Carol Turnbull Redditt, New Orleans.

Edward James Riley, New Orleans.

Mary Cecilia Roberts, Lincoln. Nebraska.

Adinah Brown Robertson, Murphy. North

Carolina.

Hazel Howell Royals, University, Mississippi.

Dora Faye Sanders, Laurel. Mississippi.

Elizabeth Perry Scott, Greenville. Mississippi.

Beryl Gay Segre, New Orleans.

Ronald Ignatius Shiloh, New Orleans.

Jimmy Neal Silver, Enid. Oklahoma.

/ PAGE 59

Barry Morris Silverstein, Westmont, New Jer-
sey.

Helen Joanna Stavros, Birmingham, Alabama.
William Freddie Stewart, Roseland, Louisiana.
John Isadore Swang, Jr., New Orleans.
Leonora Kerr Talley, Roanoke, Virginia.
Richard Leighion Tappe, Visalia, California.
Mary Glenn Thomas, Houston, Texas.
Linda Faye Todd, Winnsboro, Louisiana.
MIchele Maria Truxilio, New Orleans.
Frances Priscilla Turner, Hattiesburg, Missis-
sippi.

John Stephen Waldo, New Orleans.
Jane Louise Waller, Chicago, Illinois.
James Moore Watts, Brookhaven, Mississippi.
John David Wells, Athens, Georgia.
Connie Lynn Wennet, Capron, Oklahoma.
Thomas Earl Wiginton, Paden, Oklahoma.
Barbara Pitts Will<inson, New Orleans.
Ezar Marietta Williams, New Orleans.

DOCTOR OF SOCIAL WORK

Avrum Isaac Cohen, Glencoe, Illinois.

GRADUATE SCHOOL

MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING

Carmen Margarita Aponte, Spanish, New Or-
leans.

Catherine Lovell Dyer, History, New Orleans.

Douglas Joseph Haas, Mathematics, New Or-
leans.

Mary Manning Henshaw, Art, Lake Charles,
Louisiana.

Lawrence Joseph Pijeaux, Art, New Orleans.
Bobby Lee Poarch, German, Valdese, North
Carolina.

Alice Amelia Sherman, English, Pensacola,
Florida.

Ronald Earl Swain, French, Spartanburg,

South Carolina.

Tina Tabachnick Weil, Art, Chicago, Illinois.

MASTER OF EDUCATION

Sarah Leonard Allen, New Orleans.
Geraldine Wheeler Butler, New Orleans.
Clara Thibodeaux Byes, New Orleans.
Barbara Delia Celles Cropp, New Orleans.
Wilbur Glenn Ferris, New Orleans
Shirley John Francois, Eunice, Louisiana.
Kathleen Gallagher, Brooklyn, New York
Richard Jacl<son Gregory, Metairie, Louisiana.
Mary Holsberry Hardy, Slidell, Louisiana
Donald Edward Jenldns, New Orleans.
Ida May Kolman, Metairie, Louisiana.

The greatest total experience in graduate
school has been the complete manifestation
of man's humanity toward man, rather than
his inhumanity, in contrasting the dilemmas
of last spring's intellectual storm with the res-
pect of this spring's purposeful serenity.
Marian Gravelie Lhotal<, Mason City, Iowa.
Mary Ann Miles, Lumberton, Mississippi.
Roscoe Marit Needles, Atlantic, Iowa.
Paula Wall Pickart, New Orleans.
Paula Teles Picker, New Orleans.
Dorothy Mary Rault, New Orleans.
Sandra Lee Reynolds, La Place, Louisiana.
Susan Kathryn Sale, Haynesville, Louisiana.
Shirley Glynn Williams, New Orleans.

MASTER OF FINE ARTS

William Delan Bush, Art (Painting), Glasgow,

Kentucky.

Joann Flom Greenberg, Art (Ceramics), New
Orleans.

Geraldine Hubbell, Music (Piano), New Or-
leans.

Stephen Paul Lowery, Art (Painting), Muncie,
Indiana.

William Lee McClary, Art (Painting), Atlante,
Georgia.

Robert Everest Parks, Art (Print Making), Ok-
lahoma City, Oklahoma.
Mart Poldmets, Art (Ceramics), Manhattan,
New York.

Albert Hilliard Smith, Jr., Art (Painting), At-
lanta, Georgia.

Richmond Louis Stubbs, Art (Sculpture), New
Orleans.

John Lee Stuntz, Theatre, Garland, Texas.
Harold Lee Swayder, Art (Ceramics), Browns-
ville, Texas.

Denise Chenel Vallon, Art (Painting), New
Orleans.

Mari-Richard Weber, Theatre, Louisville, Ken-
tucky.

Stephen Dale Wilson, Art (Print Making), New
Orleans.

Patricia Faith Woodward, Music (Voice), Mo-
bile, Alabama.

Bonnie Lynn Zakotnik, Music (Organ), Wash-
ington, District of Columbia.

MASTER OF ARTS

David Leslie Arnett, English, Tucson, Arizona.
Aurora Elvira Babb-Torres, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Gomez Palacio, Durango, Mexico.
Richard John Batt, History, New Orleans.

Karen Ann Becnel, Spanish and Portuguese,
New Orleans.

Janet Rebecca Bender, Latin American Stu-
dies, Somerset, Pennsylvania.
Susan Birenbaum, Art (History), Waterbury,
Connecticut.

William Patrick Bishop, English, Alexaq^dria,
Louisiana.

Lucille Gilberte Bollard, French and Italian,
Swansea, Massachusetts.
Shelley Ann Bowen, Latin American Studies,
Winter Park, Florida.

Gary Harold Brooks, Political Science, Mc-
Comb, Mississippi.

Harvey Rowland Brooks, Theatre, Sheridan,
Arkansas.

Peter William Bruton, History, San Antonio,
Texas.

John Philip Clark, III, Philosophy, New Or-
leans.

Jeanne Schaub Classe,' French and Italian,
Scarsdale. New York.

Sarajane Jack Di Laura, Latin American Stu-
dies, Port Deposit, Maryland.
Jo Beth Barnes Eubanks, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, New Orleans.
Geneva Cherylene Evans, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Alexander City, Alabama.
John DeKlyn Evans, Latin American Studies,
Bellevue, Washington.

Margaret Ellen Gates, Political Science, Mo-
bile, Alabama.

Maria Crisb'na Quinones Guilott, Spanish and
Portuguese, Barranquilla, Columbia.
Mary Farrar Hatchette, Music, New Orleans.
Arlene Suzanne Hechter, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Miami Beach, Florida.
Charles Matthew Hogan, Classical Languages,
Long Beach, California.
John Lindsey Holleman, Philosophy, Mobile,
Alabama.

Linda Tarte Holley, English, Darlington, South
Carolina.

Neil Steiner Hyman, Art (History), New Or-
leans.

Luis Iglesias, Spanish and Portuguese, Sala-
manca, Spain.

Diane Phillips Jennings, Political Science,
Bishop, California.

Lanny Vincent Johnson, Latin American Stu-
dies, Quincy, Illinois.

Sheila Hope Jurnak, English, New York, New
York.

Frank Sheridan Kennett, History, Asheville,
North Carolina.

Eileen Elizabeth Kirk, Latin American Studies,
Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Joann Victoria Kling, French and Italian, Cu-
pertino, California.

Katharine Chapman Krebs, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Denver, Colorado.
Elizabeth Werner Lawrence, Art (History), New
Orleans.

Gary Russell Libby, English, Fort Meyers,
Florida.

Earl Franklin Luetzelschwab, English, High-
land, Indiana.

Bonnie Kaplan Lyons, English, New Orleans.
Ann Alford Martin, German, Vicksburg, Mis-
sissippi.

Cheryl English Martin, History, Buffalo, New
York.

Mary Helen Matlick, Philosophy, Louisville,
Kentucky.

Robert Samuel McGinnis, Jr., Philosophy,
Owensboro, Kentucky.

Adna Rosa Rodriguez Menendez, Spanish and
Portuguese, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Antonio Ramon Montane,' Spanish and Por-
tuguese, New Orleans.
Elizabeth Franz Mount, French and Italian,
Scarsdale, New York.

Edward John Murphy, Philosophy, Chicago,
Illinois.

George Theodore Pantos, English, Livingston,
New Jersey.

Patricia Ann Pesoli, English, Ithaca, New York.
Frank Timothy Petruszak, Political Science,
Homewood. Illinois.

Rebecca Sue Porterfield, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Montgomery, Alabama.
Joseph Earl Riehl, English, New Orleans.
Michele Helyne Risko, Spanish and Portu-
guese, Pickens, South Carolina.
Maria Clementina Ruiz, Spanish and Portu-
guese, Aguas Calientes, Mexico.
Allen Kreger Smith, Philosophy, Brooklyn,
New York,

Cynthia Elisa Smith, Latin American Studies,
New Orleans.

Linda Louise Sommerfield, German, Cleve-
land, Ohio.

John Hunter Spence, English, Camilla, Geor-
gia.

Mary Christina Stretch, Latin American Stu-
dies, St. Louis, Missouri.
Margarita Ortiz Swetman, Spanish and Por-
tuguese, Thibodaux, Louisiana.
Hilda Debora ten Brink, Latin American Stu-
dies, New Orleans.

Jorge Luis Valderrama, History, Medellin, Co-
lumbia.

Charles David Ward, Philosophy, Aurora, Illi-
nois.

Benjamin Van Leonard Weathersby, English,
McComb, Mississippi.

Charles Harrell Weathersby, Jr., English,
Amite, Louisiana.

MASTER OF SCIENCE

James Johannes Bishara, Chemical Engi-
neering, Dedham, Massachusetts.

PAGE 60 /

Clifford Joseph Boasso, Physics, New Or-
leans.
Ronald Wilfred Busuttll, Pharmacology,

Tampa, Florida

John Howard Caruso, Biology. Rutherford,
New Jersey.

tUlaneck Godrej Chlchgar, Geology. Bombay.
India

Barbar Jean Conner, Speech Pathology. Ne-

macolin, Pennsylvania.

Harold Jon Cramer, Chemical Engineering,
New Orleans.

Austin Theodore Fitzjarrell, Biology, Overland
Park, Kansas

Sarah Ann Burnett Frates, Psychology, Dyers-
burg, Tennessee

Jan iVIarshall Friedman, Biochemistry. Alton.

Illinois.

i\1ichael Edward Glowacz, Geology, Chicago,
Illinois

Deepal( (Vlanohar Guple, Physics, Bombay.
India.

David IVIichaei Hegedus, Mechanical Engi-
neering. New Orleans.

Alche Sabbagh Jasser, Pharmacology. Da-
mascus. Syria.

Pral<ash Narsing Karkal, Mechanical Engi-
neering. Bombay. India.
William Frederick LaMarfin, Mathematics,
Okeechobee. Florida.

Allan Harold Lambert, Chemical Engineering,
New Orleans. V

Jannan George Lee, Mechanical Engineering,
Taipei, Taiwan.

Joyce Ellen Krohn Levingston, Biology. Co-
lumbus. Georgia.

Joel Howard Lewis, Psychology. Houston,
Texas.

Marcllle Mahan, Anatomy. Lola. Kentucky,

Frank Hastings McKim, Pharmacology. West
River. Maryland.

William Alan Montevecchi, Psychology. Bev-
erly. Massachusetts.

Juan Bautista Pericchi, Mechanical Engi-
neering. Caracas. Venezuela.
Uwe Rainer Pontius, Mechanical Engineering.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Joann Ratton, Geology. Memphis. Tennessee.
Edward Patrick Riley, Psychology. Roselle
Park, New Jersey,

James Millard Sothern, Geology. Houma.
louisiana.

Louis Oscar Smith, Jr., Mechanical Engi-
neering. Metairie. Louisiana.
Newell Allan Smith, Jr., Mechanical Engi-
neering, New Orleans,

Shirley Nichols Sparks, Speech Pathology,
New Orleans

George Alexander Swan, III, Chemical Engi-
neering, Biloxi, Mississippi.
Martin Franz Vogt, Chemical Engineering. New
Orleans,

Martin Stuart Waite, Psychology. Springfield.
Massachusetts.

Paul Tennyson Williams, Chemical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Wilburn Holt Akers, Paleontology, New Or-
leans.

Paul James Anastasiou, Psychology. Bran-
ford. Connecticut

Peter Michael Andrews, Biology. Wheaton.
Maryland.

James Franklin Baker, History. Houston.
Texas.

Frank Vernon Barchard. Jr., History. Foley.
Alabama

Roger Daniel Bleier, Mathematics. Browns-
ville. Texas.

Margaret Nell Bond, Anthropology. Quitman,
Mississippi

Ernesto Marcelino Bonllla-Romero, Biochem-
istry, Maracaibo, Venezuela
Gearold Peter Breidenbach, Microbiology.
Kenton, Ohio

Charles Lillie Campbell, Geology, New Or-
leans

Stephen Webb Carmichael, Anatomy, Mo-
desto, California

Frederick Lamar Chapman, Theatre, Toledo,
Ohio

Sheila O'Donnell Collins, Mathematics, New
Orleans.

John Randolph Conover, English. Huntsville,
Alabama.

Malcolm Anthony Cunningham, Spanish and
Portuguese. Newton Highlands. Massachu-
setts.

William Schuyler deCamp, Political Science.
New Orleans-

James Michael DeGeorge, English. Houston,
Texas.

David Lawrence DeSha, Anatomy. San An-
tonio. Texas.

Elizabeth Mary Earley, Biology. Bala-Cynwyd.
Pennsylvania.

Kenneth Raymond Farr, Political Science.
Jackson. Michigan.

Jackson Franklin Ferguson, German. Blacks-
burg. Virginia.

Sharon Kaye File, Parasitology. Dowagiac.
Michigan.

Ferris Raymond Fox, II, Biology. New Orleans.
Michele Bailliet Frangois, Economics. Thibo-
daus. Louisiana.

David John Garland, Mechanical Engineering.
New Orleans.

Charles Henry Goodman, Mechanical Engi-
neering. Fort Worth, Texas.
Barry Jude Haindel, Physics. New Orleans.
Ralph Malcolm Hayward, III, English. Basking
Ridge. New Jersey.

Marcia Alice Herndon, Anthropology. Canton,
North Carolina.

Wayne Clanton Hobbs, Music, Metairie, Loui-
siana.

Randolph Michael Howes, Biochemistry. Pon-
chatoula. Louisiana

Adam Joseph Hulin, Mathematics, Kenner.
Louisiana.

Forrest Jack Hurley, History. Fort Worth.
Texas.

Philip Brian Johnson, History. Lee. Illinois.
Benna Kay Kime, English. Tulsa. Oklahoma.
Ben Harold Knott, Social Work, Cincinnati.
Ohio.

Mervin Kontrovitz, Geology. Trenton, New
Jersey.

Donn Maulsby Kurtz, II, Political Science.
Lafayette. Louisiana.

Anita Saffels Lawson, English. Tallahassee,
Florida.
Carolina Donadio Lawson, French and Italian,

Park Forest. Illinois

John Young Lebourgeois, History. New Or-
leans

Salvador Eugene Longo, Physics, New Or-
leans

Helene Shulman Schell Lorenz, Philosophy,
Mill Valley, California.

Jude Thomas May, History. Oklahoma City.
Oklahoma

Michael Kenneth May, Biology. Mandeville.
Louisiana.

Lewis Jerome Mayard, Chemical Engineering,
Ashland. Kentucky

Cruse Douglas Melvin, Physics. Woodville.
Texas.

Edward Adam Moffatt, Mechanical Engi-
neering. Oakland. California.
Julius Peter Neumeyer, III, Chemical Engi-
neering, New Orleans.

Martin Ottenheimer, Anthropology, Manhattan,

Kansas.

Morris Hayward Pardue, Economics, New Or-
leans.

Dabney Glenn Park. Jr., History. Houston,
Texas.

Joseph Balfour Parker, Political Science,
Crowville, Louisiana.

Fred Paul Partus, Mechanical Engineering,
Belleville. New Jersey,

Dwight Edward Phillips. Anatomy. Hilger,
Montana.

Benjamin Edward Pierce, Anthropology,
Hammond. Louisiana.

Monte Eddy Piliawsky, Political Science. New
Orleans.

Quentin Albert Pletsch, Biochemistry,
Marietta. Georgia.

Claude Wylie Poag. Paleontology. Bryan,
Texas.

Stuart Elden Rich, Chemical Engineering,
Miami. Florida.

Alwyn Rudolph Rouyer, Political Science, New
Orleans.

Mercedes Esmeralda Soberano, Biochemistry,
Bacolod City. Philippines
Gerald Douglass Stormer. Philosophy. River-
side. Illinois.

Robert Gentry Summers. Jr., Anatomy. Son-
era. California.

Alonso Takahashi, Mathematics. Call. Colum-
bia.

Chester Neal Tate, Political Science. Gas-
tonia. North Carolina.

Timothy Junius Triche, Anatomy. Derwood.
Maryland

Alexander Von Schoenborn. Philosophy. Pra-
kue. Czechoslovakia

David Michael Warner. Business Administra-
tion, Rocky Mount, North Carolina.
Charles Wittman Weston. Chemistry. Pass
Christian, Mississippi.

Elsa Louise Winsor, Parasitology, St. Peters-
burg. Florida

Roman Bohdan Worobec, Microbiology. New

Orleans

■fi^py'

paf?^noia
ofatention

man

emptv 19

©nancy duell

A Dead Nude
Isn't So Bad

This year, when they uncrated the 1 971 Gumbo there was something different
about its 520 pages— from its surrealistic cover of red, white and blue through
its pages of flashy colors and irreverent text— nude pictures had been used
for the first time.

Appearance of the book set students abuzz and prompted Baton Rouge
State Rep. Irving "Bo" Boudreaux to blast the book as containing "the
nastiest pictures he'd ever seen."

He won House approval of a bill expressing legislative disapproval of the
annual's editorial policy, reducing state funding of the publication, and calling
for appointment of an advisory council to oversee publication of the book,
a step already taken by LSU . . .

"I just think those kids need better supervision to produce a better book
next year," said Boudreaux.

—Charles Zewe

The States-Item

May 28, 1971

PAGE 64

A resolution by Sen. Ted Hickey of
New Orleans banning nudes in Loui-
siana colleges and universities was
refused a vote and sent to committee
by a 23-5 vote of the Senate last
week and died there when the Sen-
ate adjourned Tuesday.

The resolution would have
directed the LSU Board of Super-
visors and the State Board of Edu-
cation "to take all necessary mea-
sures within their authority ... to
prohibit any and all persons from
appearing nude in any classroom,
studio, theater, auditorium or public j
place on the campus of a university j
or college under the administration
of said boards, and to take all lawful
measures to enforce such prohibi-
tion."

Objecting to a "revelation of com- j
plete nudity of the human body at i
a state-supported university," Hickey ;
said allowing nudes in educational ■
classes is "immoral if nothing else."

"The police in New Orleans are
raiding Bourbon Street places
nightly for the same purposes. An
educational system does no good
that requires nudes in the classes,"

Hickey said.

Lt. Gov. C. C. Aycock, President
of the Senate, asked Hickey if the
resolution applied to medical
schools. Hickey replied, "A dead
nude isn't so bad. It's a live one that
causes temptations."

Sen J. D. DeBlieux of Baton
Rouge led the fight to send the reso-
lution to committee and told Hickey,
"If they appeared in the classes for
the same reason they do on Bourbon
Street, I v^/ould agree with you. No
one believes in morality more than
I do."

Sen. Jules Mollere of Metairie
asked Hickey, "What about Miche-
langelo?" and reminded him of the
murals showing nudes which are
displayed on the walls of the foyer
of the Capitol. Hickey replied they
were made of "stone and granite."

—Freda Yarbrough

The Summer Reveille.
June 10, 1971

PAGE 66

• .>

^ '^-4:.

/L'-%

'*;

JAMBALAYA 1971

MATT ANDERSON

PRINCIPAL ACCOMPLICES

DIANE BURNSIDE. WYLIE DAWSON. AND PATRICIA
HOPKINS.

HELPING HANDS

FRANCISCO ALECHA, MARCIA BENNETT. JON BLEHAR.
ANNE BOUDREAUX, LEE PICKETT, CAROL STONE. AND
RICK STREIFFER.

PHOTOGRAPHY

MATT ANDERSON/ cover, 4-5, 6, 7, 10-13, 14-17, 18,
20-21, (bottom), 22-23, 24 (top & bottom), 25, 26,
27 (bottom), 28 (right), 29, 30, 34, 35, 40-43, 44-
45, 46, 51, 55, 57, 60-61. farrell hockemeire/
8-9, 31, 37, 39, aaron navah/ 32. mike smith/ 3,
8-9 (inserts), 20-21 (top), 24 (middle), 28 (left),
62-63. 64.

> ,' ■'.■"^'^''- -■" -ii'k^''""' ' lift I ' vv. ' '
: ' U'*'''^.iW' j^-v'-'' !' ''■''" ;"■'■■■..

; ':;ii ;":!iM.;.

1-' J,

#:::f

y^^

wmmm

! ','rf

.- ...X

'.'i.i'''-