(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Jambalaya [yearbook] 1971"

Digitized by the Internet Archive 

in 2010 with funding from 

Lyrasis IVIembers and Sloan Foundation 



http://www.archive.org/details/jambalayayearboo76edit 



AMBALAVTV 



NIVERSITY 



LOUISIANA 



OOK 1 



^1A 



L^vil 



t 




The automobile license plates label the state as the 
"sportsman's paradise," but common sense and or 
a few months' observation would lead one to think 
of Louisiana as a paradise for the sociologist or the 
photographer. By living in New Orleans for any length 
of time, one can easily detect the contrasts along the 
major arteriel streets, absorb the facial expressions, 
the structural facades, both wooden and crystaline, 
that frame those same faces, and realize that the stra- 
tification in the parish is nearly complete. 



But where does that put Tulane University and its 
students? Perhaps we too are part of the New Orleans 
syndrone. On a day to day basis, it is fairly easy to 
overlook the problems of this area by staying near the 
uptown campus during the day, or by selecting Clai- 
borne or St. Charles over Freret when using public 
or private transportation to travel to the Vieux Carre 
or the central business district. In our own way, we 
have created our own form of paradise, our own little 













J"' •-<f ***- " *•* 



Utopia on our precious tract of land in the "university 
section." What better place is there to forget about 
national or global problems, or the slum conditions 
that are just a few blocks away on Freret Street? 

In our own sphere of influence, that is, in New Or- 
leans, and at Tulane, each of us have to make a choice. 
As individuals, or in groups, we can be content to 
educate ourselves, or we can try to educate and in- 
teract with the community and the University for the 



betterment of both parties. Relaxing on the U.C. squad 
may have its benefits, but there are better things to 

be done. 

As for the "sportsman's paradise," and the Utopian 
life style— try Biloxi. 

Matt Anderson 

Editor. 

Jambalaya 1971 






\i\ 






^ J5 • < ^ 



■P'^; ft 



Hi-, '^'-' 









U: 



K 



\ : 




Uf 



/ 



y 



t*''^"' 

B.^*^:::' 










rv ; 









U 



^'i*---.^- 




iC*^^ 






• .-.• ¥-.^-??aiSiS>a'Ss. 



m m-^ 



r*f^ 



fi^**'. 






3^ 






iii^^ ^ . 



^^..^ 



;rl 



15^ - 






S55 ;8' 



ll« 





iis -•;'>^' 






v^ 5, 






«, ^* 



,:.- .Vi 






8 / SOW THE SEED 

10 / BUCKPASSING 101 

14 /A COUPLING 

16 / MAGAZINE STREET 

24 / THE TALE OF NINE RATS 

38 / A CRISIS' 

40 / THE BIRTH OF A MUSHROOM 

44 / FOR THE LOVE OF SCIENCE 

48 / AN EDITORIAL 

50 / WHO SHALL GOVERN, WHO SHALL RULE 

56 / JAZZ: DISCOVERY AND DIFFUSION 

64 / DORMS 

72 / THE COLONEL 

76 / C.A.C.T.U.S. 

82 / STOPPING TO THINK ABOUT IT . . . AGAIN 

88 / LOOKING BACK: J.Y.A. 

94 / LAW AND THE PUBLIC 

98 / ARCHITECTURE: EVOLUTION BEYOND ALL PRECEDENT 
102 / FREE UNIVERSITY 
104 / A SNACK BAR 
106 / RUSH 

110 / FRATERNITIES: HOW LONG WILL THEY BE ABLE TO STAY? 
114 /IT'S ALL RIGHT 
118 / FROM THE VILLAGE TO THE DALE 
122 / THE TULANE ATHLETE. CIRCA 1971 
126 / RELIGION AD HOC 
128 / ODE TO A NEWCOMB GIRL 
130 / THE NEWCOMB IMAGE 

136 / HOMECOMING COURT 1971 BEAUTY AND THE BEAST 
140 / SUNDAY AFTERNOON 
148 / "POETS AND THEIR WORDS" 
152 / OCTOBER 24 
158 / DICK GREGORY 
162 / THE U.C. BOARD 
166 / MEDIA 

180 / THE HOLLYWOOD FORMULA 
182 / MONTACHINO AND SmiMER LYRIC 
186 / CAMPUS NITE SEVENTi'-ONE 
188 / KUYPERS AT 70 
190 / A CAPPELLA CHOIR A C4PPELLA 
192 / TULANE UNIVERSITV THEATRE 
196 / OH WHAT A LO> ELY WAR! 
200 / R.O.T.C. 
204 / MESSAGE FROM SEOUL 




PAGE 8 / 




sow the seed 



The growth of the consciousness within the university is like a tree. Tulane 

has matured a great deal in the last tew years. Some of this growth has 
been painful. Students and faculty felt the chill of a new season, and were 
blown from the branches of the University. Some felt that the school had 
lost its sap. and others viewed the tree as bare. A few leaves fell to the earth 
to produce fodder for the winter season and to replenish the tree. 

Underground, the students and the faculty organically broke down to feed 

the tree, while other forces from without felt the best way to improve the 
University would be to bulldoze it into shape. The science complex sprung 
up after a tree had been bulldozed, so that ideas could blossom from the 
building. That tree had flourished on campus due to the special soil and 
climatic environment, and because a doctor had taken care to plant a 
special seed. This seed was one of two that had been sent by a colleague 
with the hope that the species, which was near extinction, would survive. 
Only six seeds were known to exist, and two were sent to Tulane. One of the 
seeds grew next to the old history department, but both gave way to a 
scientific computer card. 

That tree was one of the casualties on the great wheel of life. But its brother 
grows tall between Richardson Memorial and Dinwiddle Hall. And in that 
tree, about three quarters of the way up. one could see on the vernal 
equinox, nestled among the branches, a basket of twigs. 

And so it is in the arms of the University that we build our consciousness in 
which we will nestle our off-spring until they are strong enough to fly away 

on their own. 

— r. Collins vallee 
march 1971 



/ PAGE 9 




buck 
passing 



torn 
Ireland 



Whenever there is a spark of originality 

Whenever there is a gleam of hope, 

As long as there is life, 

Wherever there is the spirit of living, 

In whatever possible form, 

It must be crushed by committees. 

— Paul Schulman (A & S '69) 



This University is dedicated to the proposition that all problems can be 
"dealt with" by committee. Besides increasing the frustration of 
people who try to do things on this campus, this type of committee 
system has two other important drawbacks. An idea is frequently aged 
and distorted beyond usefulness or recognition through the committee 
process. A good idea, even if it were to come out of the committee 
intact, is generally so old that it no longer carries the piquancy and 
relevancy it once had. 

Also, an idea, once approved by a committee, becomes an 
institution — it can only be changed or modified by repeating the same 
process of committee consideration. Minor repairs require just as 
much effort as a total overhaul. 

By mid-fall of 1969, there seemed to be no solution to the problem. 
Then, during the T.L.F. uprising of the following spring, it became 
painfully apparent to everyone that something had to be done to speed 
up the decision-making process. 



PAGE 10 / 




N r^jx^<? '^ H 



/ PAGE 11 




PAGE 12 / 



The University's Academic Council suggested 

a conference of all segments of the University 

Community to try to answer some of the critical 

questions the University faced; and somehow, 

the 1970 Summer Conference got off the 

ground. For three days, students, faculty, 

administrators, alumni, and others sat opposite 

each other and "talked" (or shouted, or argued, 

or accused, or denied). 



The members of the Board of Administrators 

claimed that they were only businessmen and, 

consequently, amateurs at handling academic 

affairs. They specialized in handling the 

University's money and had hired the president 

and all the other administrators to handle 

academic affairs, they said. The administrators 

feigned shock at the paralyzingly slow process 

of change in the University and said they only 

wanted to handle matters affecting the financial 

situation of the University. 

An idea began to take root: lower-level 
administrators could make decisions and act on 
them without having to endure the stifling 
committee process. Students, faculty, and 
administrators began changing the decision- 
making process of the University so that the 
buck would stop with them. New constitutions 
and by-laws flourished. Changes began to 
occur in less than a year, less than a semester, 
sometimes even less than a month. 
Administrators were beginning to have a 
function besides trying to placate and further 
delay students already infuriated by frustration. 

And now that administrators could actually 

DO things, another new idea began to take 

shape: it actually does some good to talk to 

people; something might actually get done even 

if no demonstrations take place. Students, 

faculty, and administrators began to talk to 

each other and things started getting done. 

An outgrowth of the same ideas that created 

the Summer Conference also created the 

weekly University Forums. Originally, the 

Forums were designed to increase the amount 

of contact between the president and the 

student body. However, during the early 

Forums, the president almost invariably 

referred questions to one of the "lower-level" 

administrators in the audience in whose special 

province the question fell. The students soon 

caught on. By second semester this year, the 

Forums consisted largely of students grilling all 

of the administrators, alerting each of them to 

problems in his specific area. 

Action-producing conversations are now 

taking place on a "lower-level" and things are 

getting done. The result? For the first time in 

many years at Tulane, a president of the student 

body has said that there is good communication 

between the students and the administration. 




/ PAGE 13 





L*^.:i.2« 




V 



PAGE 16 ti 



\'-.-;\--' 


- V-' V 


"^^ 


I 


1 


■'.'.'■>; 


'&. 






i 


■ ■'< y 


' ' ■ " 'i'' 


^ *' 


j^' 






".' -':■<' 


^"^^ i.ti 


•4" 


■■,i 


j> ; 


''■'V''i 


• -' .••: 


.',;-- 


-^,-, 




r.-va 


^Hj 


M 


ri 



'^.y^j 




0(J11/T 



nf iQu 






PAGE 18 / 





Old, blind, and lonely for those summers whose 

slack now gathers as wrinkles in their skin, their 

apathetic fingers throb numb with the idleness of 

sixty false winters. The soft deadness in their eyes is 

sometimes mistaken for that darkness which falls as 

a shadow from the prophet's brow and they are 

called Immortal. 

But the dust of grave's first layer, the mark of 

earth's own, clings snowlike to their old-rolled 

trousers and time-whitened heads, and waits like 

Fate upon their breasts making each breath more 

like those drawn through the lips of the dead. 

The children roll like quarters down the nickel- 
coloured sidewalks. But here value lives not m 
simile, but in the novelty of the old wood and iron- 
stoppered bottles which the Immortals sell to buy 
false teeth and coffin nails. 

— Farrell Hockemeier 





/ PAGE 19 




I 



PAGE 22 / 



Dirty old storefronts. 

So peacefully quiet inside. 

A welcome rest 

From the continuous traffic 

and screaming children. 

Dusty bottles and rotting furniture 
Echo the age of the street. 
Storekeepers' faces express 
Their most frequent complaint: 

"Business is slow." 

It all seems so useless. 

The irony, of course. Magazine Street 

Is essential to New Orleans. 

— Tom Lee 






/ PACE 23 



the rat of 
the tale of 



tales 




PAGE 24 / 





v*,*^ 






tales by 
jim dalfares 



illustrations by 
rusty Josephs 



In recent years. Tulane has been most adept at at- 
tracting certain students who seenned to have formed 
definite campus cliques. It is not our desire here to in- 
form the world of the characters Tulane seems to be 
currently plagued with: on the other hand, they cannot 
simply be ignored. We imagine that the preemment 
success Tulane has had in this regard is a simple case 
of "build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a 
path to your door." 

And you might catch a few mice while you're at it. For 
despite rumors about "rats deserting a sinking ship." it 
is known that several species of rats are currently still 
attending the University. No immediate cause for alarm. 
but we think we should perhaps pause now and reflect 
on who plagued the universities of Europe in 1349 with 
their mysterious "black death". (Sounds like the title of 
a Flash Gordon thriller, doesn't it?) 

It is now. of course, de rigueur to attack such a clas- 
sification of campus types. After all. isn't everyone now 
doing his own thing, and doesn't "doing your own 
thing " preclude doing it like everyone else? We think 
not. though we admit we might well be forced to defend 
our essay with all the fierceness and tenancity of a cor- 
nered rat. 

The world-renowned scholar Arthur Koestler. in his 
book The Ghost in the Machine, attacks what he calls 
the philosophy of "ratomorphism' . In previous times. 
man committed the error of anthropomorphism — or at- 
tributing to animals and objects human qualities. With 
the present emphasis of psychology and behavioralism 
however. Koestler feels that the opposite fallacy is 
coming to the foreground — ratomorphism. or at- 
tributing to humans only animal characteristics. Thus. 
Koestler deplores the fact that Pavlov counted the 
drops salivating from a dog's mouth, and from this, dis- 
tilled a philosophy of mankind. 

Certainly we would deny a desire to support a belief in 
such a Kafkaesque metamorphosis. In a true sense 
however, all Tulane students are caged rats in an ex- 
periment, and it is not by any means unpredictable that 
so many will turn out to be neurotic, to have behavior 
pattern fixations. They have perhaps been constantly 
conditioned to act so. having no more real freedom 
than a citizen in 1984. And Winston Smith in that novel 
perhaps realized, in his absolute horror of being placed 
in a cage full of rats, that he was no more free than 
they. 

So. on we persevere in our attempt to depict several 
easily recognized campus species, knowing all the 
while how easily we might be proved guilty of not being 
completely serious in our endeavor. At the same time, 
we hope only that our voices are not as completely 
quiet and meaningless "as wind in dry grass or rats' 
feet over broken glass in our dry cellar' . 



/ P.\GE 25 



the dorm-ouse 

When awake, usually between 6 
p.m. and 6 a.m., the Dorm-ouse 
feels safe within his womb, hiding 
in his room, encased within his 
tomb. College is to while away four 
or five or six years learning how to 
be a slob. Class is that rare ritual of 
diversionary activity — finding 
another place to rack out 
occasionally. Registration is to 
schedule your classes between one 
and three in the afternoon, and to 
see that you never have to walk up 
a flight of stairs or cross Freret 
Street. Luckily, Eddie's is just on 
this side of your self-set territorial 
limits. 

In any case, you don't go outside at 
all if the temperature is below 60° 
or if it looks like rain. You just 
remain inside your room — your 
pride and joy, your warm mother, 
your lover, your wife. Your new 
lady friend lives in. She has ample 
knobs and she's colored. Her name 
is Zenith. When you're bored with 
Zenith, you go and console your 
friend General Electric, who really 
likes to open up. The General is full 
of the good things in life — like 
food. Or 500 hits. And last, but not 



least, is your bed, with whom you 
share your most intimate moments. 
She says you talk in your sleep but 
only use four-letter words. 
If you can manage to stay in bed all 
day, you figure you've just about 
broken even with life. 

Life is also an all-night bridge 
game. 

You do emerge from your cocoon 
to fly high every Friday and Sunday 
night. No matter how bad, boring 
or bloody it might be — come rain, 
or sleet, or dark of night — you 
cannot miss seeing a free flick. As 
everyone knows, the show must go 
on. At least until you light up. 

You've been in the same room for 
five years. Advisors come and 
advisors go, but you live on. 
Tacked to your door is a sign 
stating, "I am Who Am." People 
walk by silently and reverently. . 
They respect you and occasionally 
come to you for advice. Especially 
at registration time. You know the 
secret love life of every professor 
on campus. You can get a 
freshman's car registered, a library 
fine erased. You know when the 
next bust will be. The Greenie cops 



call you by your first name, the 
ladies at Bruff give you an extra 
helping, and Herbie knows you well 
enough to grimance as he walks 
past you. 

You are a lurker. If you are up 
during the day, there is nothing 
better to do than to go over to the 
U.C. and lurk for five or six hours. 
Your booth is the second from the 
jukebox, unless you retire to one of 
the tables to play bridge. You know 
Fast Freddie and Manny down in 
the pool hall; they reserve table 
five for you. 

Basically though, you are a child of 
the night. You love dark corridors, 
gloomy skies, hard blues. Your 
favorite book is Dracula. 
Other people on your corridor don't 
know your real name. They refer to 
you by silently shaking their heads. 
You do have a nickname the whole 
dorm knows though, pointing out 
your peculiar idiosyncracies. It 
might not be "Birdman" or "White 
Rabbit" or "The Alien", but it is 
recognizable enough. 

10:30 p.m.: Pretzels and beer and 
"It Takes A Thief." 



PAGE 26 / 



L 



the frat rat 



Like the other rats, you — the frat 

rat — have your own distinctive 

costume, which you believe is a 

signal flag to members of the 

opposite sex that you are the type 

of man who reads ■Playboy" — i.e.. 

a real plastic swinger. From your 

fashion-collared pocket-stayed 

Gant shirts to your weejun boots. 

you are in the height of style. 

Those of you frats who are rich, but 
don't want to be particularly 
ostentatious or engage in 
conspicuous consumption, own 
only a regular Cutlass instead of a 
442. Even so. it is equipped with a 
vinyl roof, black vinyl interior, a 
stereo tape deck with a four- 
speaker system, and bucket 
seats — with the middle hump 
covered by a pillow so you and 
your date can. thus neutralizing 
one of the most effective means of 
birth control today. To create your 
own rhythm, you can also use your 
variable-speed windshield wiper. 

Booze and boobs used to be your 

staple. On big outings, you were 

always ready with a bottle in the 

car as soon as your date got in. 

When fixing a date for one of your 

brothers, the greatest compliment 

you can pay a girl is, "Like, man, 

you'll really dig her: she can drink 

me under the table." For you know 

you have to pour drink after drink 

down the almost-insatiable 

Newcomb gullet before you can 

hope for some ACTION. 

In the liberated Tulane of today 

though, grass has assumed all the 

mystique of a fifth of Scotch or 

Bourbon. Now when you pick up 

your date, you often just ask. ■'Hey. 

baby, ya' wanna turn on? ' In one 

way or another though, you are still 

looking for your Southern Comfort. 

You sucker pledges into joining the 

fraternity because they pay the 

dues. They are greeted by the 

Face — the rush chairman with the 

$100,000 smile. Funny how all you 

big brothers, who promised the 

freshmen to get them dates and to 

tutor them, now either ignore them 

completely once they are pledged. 

or go to them on a Friday before a 

football game with a "Hey, Sam, I 

PAGE 28 / 




bet you know a lot of freshman 

girls in your classes." Your 

brothers are your real pals until 

they get the paddle into their hand, 

with a sadistic gleam to their 

eye — then watch out! When drunk 

though, you form your collective 

womb, and hold hands, and sing. 

and stomp through the beer sludge 

while your dates look on. 

Cute, isn't it? 

Your greatest possible pleasure is 

a football weekend. If you want to 

be true to your name as a frat rat. 

you must already be bombed at the 



pre-game cocktail party. The 

purpose of the football game itself 

is to get your date excited, to yell 

obscenities and to thereby parch 

your throat. And after the game 

there is the glorious dance, more 

appropriately called the ball. 

You have Playboy nudes on all four 

walls and your bible is the Frosh 

which comes out every year just in 

time for you to call up prospects to 

inquire. "Say, do you look as neat 

as your picture? And would you 

like a date with a real live Frat 

Rat?" 




minnie mouse 

It is hard to characterize the 
thoroughly modern Minnie. You are 
rapidly changing your image from 
that of the villager-clad, weejun-shod, 
well-bred filly (sired by Who's Who 
out of Social Register). In accord with 
the changing trends of fashion, you, 
the Newcomb co-ed are now sporting 
faded blue jeans, tie dyed T-shirts 
(sans bra), and an occasional maxi- 
skirt: the midis never did quite make 
it on campus. The coiffure has 
remained basically unchanged: with 
the exception of an occasional shag, 
you still grow your mane long enough 
to be able to shake it in the breeze. 

Socially our young lady finds 

herself in quite a quandry. The 

frat man just isn't movmg swiftly 

enough to keep pace with her 

liberated attitudes. But that only 

leaves the REAL FREAKS! And 

everybody knows that in addition to 

being dirty, and smelly, and addicted. 

they are also victims of various 



unmentionable sexual diseases. This 

leaves you no alternative but to 

demean yourself on Friday and 

Saturday nights and to don your Dior 

originals and make the scene at the 

Top of the Mart (capitalism is really 

disgusting isn't it?). But after all. 

Mommy and Daddy didn't shell out 

516,000 to have you graduate 

ringless. 

Another traumatic problem which 
confronts the "new " Newcombite, is 
the old sorority hang-up. Like it or not 
girls, it is still part of the 'status- 
quo' . Thus even the girl who is trying 
desperately to become part of the 
•Now" generation must subject 
herself to pangs of Rush. Although 
the emphasis is not quite as heavy 
(girls no longer transfer to LSU for a 
semester to pledge Chi Omega there, 
and the suicide attempts when the 
Kappa rejection list comes out are not 
quite as prevalent), the bidding is still 
very important. 



The sexual revolution is not quite the 
scene at Newcomb yet. Although it 

has been rumored that there has not 

been a virgin Newcomb grad since 

before the days of Sophie herself, 

Nancy cannot quite bring herself to 

fornicate on the quad. Drugs? Well. 

everybody is smoking now. I mean 

even some of the straight people 

engage m illicit marijuana activities. 

But hard dope? Do you think I would 

do that to My bod? They cant prove 

that the pill is medically harmful you 

know. 

Alas everybody knows that the Real 

world isn't very interested m what the 

"Now" generation is doing to change 

the Newcomb co-ed. After four years 

as a fashionable freak you will 

obviously have released all of your 

hostilities and surrender. You will 

take your place among the ranks of 

other "educated ' housewives. 

/ P.\GE 29 



mighty mouse 

Life is like a game of football. 
And football develops mature, 
responsible young men. That's why 
you need bed check and study hall. 

But all work and no play makes 
Jock a dull boy. You have two main 
recreational activities — machine 
smashing and queer bashing. 
Bystanders might be appalled at 
first to see you singlehandedly 
reduce a sparkling new candy 
machine into a squeaking hulk of 
junk before their very eyes. But to 
watch a wild beast in anger is a 
beautiful thing. 

The philosophic undertones of your 
actions are apparent moreover, to 
anyone who has studied the 
Luddite movement or the risings of 
the German Handwerker in 1848. 
You stand as the unsung hero of all 
those unable to cope in the 
increasingly technological, 
complex world of today. You use 



only your brute instincts for 
survival, bringing back ancient, 
fond memories of an earlier era. 

For college has taught you that 
"intellectual means ineffectual. 
Isn't that what your whole 
education has been about? 

As for queer bashing, you define a 
queer as anyone who has long hair 
or who stands under six feet in 
height and who (horrors) doesn't 
care to work out with weights daily. 
Or who (worst of all) perhaps even 
likes classical music. It's enough to 
make a decent American sick. 

After all, there's nothing really 
wrong with roughing up a few 
"queers." So roll on. Green Wave. 
Violence is as American as apple 
pie. 

It's not that football glorifies 
violence or ir-rat-ional solutions to 
your problems, whether you're 
blitzing in on defense or tossing 
the long bomb. It's not that football 



PAGE 30 / 




overemphasizes blind obedience to 
your leader and fascistic 
discipline. But what ever happened 
to the old Statue of Liberty play? 

Actually, the campus has a 
disturbing'tendency to lump you 
together with all the others who 
live on the upper floors of Sharp, 
whereas, you might not have all that 
much in common with your 
floormates. You might be in college 
to study primarily and to play 
sports only secondarily. You might 
even be a weekend hippie. 

But the campus does group all of 
you together, for they come into 
little contact with you, thinking that 
there are two entirely separate 
cultures living side by side, 
speaking separate languages and 
having little regard for each other. 
Thus, your language is thought to 
be marked by the extensive use of 
monosyllablization and by the use 
of a different system of morphemes 
and phonemes than the rest of the 
campus — in short, your speech is 
blunted, stunt6k:l, grunted. 

And the almost superhuman 
initiation rites intiSlx3(SKeiom prevent 
the plebeian student from ever 
being admitted into your august ^ 
SQclety. And on youftpwtfyojj do " \ 
jpbt care to mingle with the scholar. 

In facj^you strangely enough 4 
engage in foraging raids into the 
scholarly community only in 
January and May, for reasons asufi 
yet undetermined. Like uphill | 
Indisin tribes who annually raid.fj^e 
lowlands in search of salt however, 
your raids are thought to be^;^^^'-^ 
caused by the need for sq. 
commodity you are ordinaril 
unable to naturally produce 




Mens sane in corpore sano^ 
be an excellent classical 
educational dictum, but the student 
sometimes feels it becomes 
ludicrous if the administration 
promotes a sound mind in an 
entirely separate and distinct 
group frorh those whose sound 
body it glorifies and immortaliz 
in the annals of sports history. 
Somehow, the student gets the 
feeling that, given a time door to 
ancient Greece, the University 
would not even try to retrieve Plato 
or Aristotle or Pericles but rather 
turn its sole attention to the 300 
Spartans who held back the 
\mmortals of Xerxes at Thermopoli; 

Imagine them with shoulder pads 
on, clad in the old olive and blue! 




the pack rat 

You denizens of the Quad, you 

Frisbee freaks, dance to the beat of 

a different drum. You wear 

designer clothes — army surplus 

originals, with sandals and beads. 

It's your uniform. 

You also grow your hair long and 

frizzy because hair is all protein, 

life's essence, and the more hair 

you have, the greater your life 

essence. Frizzy hair also acts as 

receptor antennae for the dark 

interplanetary forces, cosmic rays, 

emanating from heavenly bodies in 

the zodiac belt and giving you 

power. 

You say you need neither food nor 

water to survive, only the scent of 

wildflowers. 

It's not that you believe in 

astrology, but it never does one 

harm to consult one's daily 

horoscope, does it? You were born 

on the cusp of the third house. You 

no longer toss a coin when you 

take multiple-choice tests; 

consulting your ouiji board is. after 

all. much more scientific. 

Hard-core freaks live in the 

Quarter or in their Volkswagen 

vans (very high status). And then 

there's Cherokee Street, the zoo 

and Creighton House. You do not 

live on twelfth floor Monroe. You do 

find splendour in the grass 

(Shakespeare's words, not ours) at 

the Festival of Life, every Sunday in 

the park. You move frequently, and 

your forwarding address reads 

simply "parts unknown." The same 

could be said of your hair. 

You sit on the U.C. steps, eight-by- 
two abreast. 

"What we have here is a failure to 

communicate. " So the warden tells 

Cool-Hand Luke. Your own 

conversation at times fails to get its 

message across to those over 

thirty, who — you complain — never 

can talk to us. Like, man, ya know 

what I mean? Real heavy, 

otherwise a bummer. All you can 

talk about is how high you got last 

night, which shows your superiority 

over the frat man whom you 

degrade. They only can talk about 

how bombed they got last night. 

You can also rap about what a 

lousy, stinking, rotten place the 

U.S. is. constantly criticizing and 



carping the straight society. Let he 

who is stoned cast the first. 

Anyway, you're soon migrating 

(you fly very high). Crete is a great 

place this time of year, almost as 

good as Morocco, though not quite 

as good as Nepal or Sikkim. 

You are ingenious. Who would 

have guessed that the best place to 

hide your lid is in the elevator 

shaft, between third and fourth 

floor, or in the hung ceiling? 

You drop out. College, after all. is 
just subsidized by the military-in- 
dustrial complex to turn out those 
half-human products that they use 
as tools to meet their needs. Who 
needs it? That's why a lot of you go 
only part-time and hang around 



here. If you work really hard at it. 

you can manage to do absolutely 

nothing all day long, except maybe 

listen to the great vibes from your 

set. And then there's the 

Warehouse on the weekend. 

If you are going full-time, you are a 

drama or psychology major. The 

real weirdos go m for philosophy. 

You are definitely, definitely not a 

freak if you read the Jamb. After 

all. Marshall McCluhan says you 

have turned away from the Western 

tradition of a visual culture to 

audio-tactile one. And you know 

that's true. 

Marshall McLuhan said it. 





PAGE 32 / 



the king rat 

Suave and slick, you are on an ego 
trip of your very own as a student 
politician. Neatly groomed, you 
wear wing tips and flair trousers 
(you wouldn't be caught dead in 
anything as wild as bell bottoms). 
You stand in the front at senate 
meetings while delivering your 
prepared impromptu speech 



worrying whether or not your fly is 
open. 

You are a schemer — an insipid, 
immature, colorless manipulator, a 
weasel, a worm. Student politics 
for you is only a stepping stone to 
greater deeds. "Today student 
senator, tomorrow . . . ?" 

Student government could be an 
effective way of getting things done 
around here, but you must 
formalize and impersonalize it to 
such an extent that it stagnates 
under the weight of your created 
inertia. You transfer all the errors 
of national government — unwieldy 
in its stifling mass of 
bureaucracy — to student 
government, which should be much 
more effective in transferring 
desires into practice because of its 
size. 

Under the facade of legal 
procedure, you thwart such goals 
and see to it that only your plans 
are enacted. On your nightstand, 
Robert's Rules of Order is your 
daily inspiration. You read it 15 
minutes a day, before retiring. You 
want to be a Big L. 

You either cop out to the 
administration daily or you "go to 
the people" and tell them that you 
are going to be a different kind of 
representative by getting everyone 
involved in improving the campus 
academia and campus 
atmosphere. "I'm not talking about 
having 30 or 40 really involved 
people on campus; I'm talking 
about having two or three thousand 
people up in arms over what is 
happening to Tulane." In any case, 
plastic radical or not, your fourth 
year you cut your hair short for 
your job interview with Scott Paper 
Co. 

You have a firm, dry handclasp and 
nothing up your sleeve; you use 
Chapstick (because you talk so 
much) and Lysol Breath Spray and 
Glorets gum and the all-new Hot 
Comb. 

Some people respect you because 
they think you know how to pull 
strings to accomplish your goals. 
More often than not, though, you 
are yourself a puppet on a string. 
You do have contacts, though; they 
look so much better than glasses. 

You also have the gift of gab. Too 
bad Pandora let it out of the box to 
plague mankind so. 




lere is 
more satisf 

jWT^., 30.-^0 

glcks^_ Mouse,'" the 

you, "but wait until you get into the 

R^ALARMY." :'— > _ - ■ 

/hat he doesn't tell, you -feth' 



rople who have been" in the ser- 

,vice, whether army or navy or air 

|fDrce. for 20 years have yet to scale 

v&'Dove the MicKe^j^ous|^hat is 

peitinent h^fc^TowevPr is to 

discuss where you can find the 

REAL ROTC. 

It is hard to find you right now, 
for it is no longer acceptable to be 
in ROTC on campuses throughout 
the country. Rumor has it, though, 
that you are alive and well and liv- 
ing in the barracks. You slink over 
to the Stadium to drill on Tuesdays, 
11 a.m. All this reeks of a clandes- 
tine operation, which is a shame 
really. For as long as the armed 
services must exist, the officers 
might as well come from liberal 
enlightened campuses as from 
isolated military enclaves of 
"higher education." The hassle 
students give you is just to remind 
you that not everyone agrees with 
the military propaganda you have 
to daily imbibe, to make you aware 
that not everyone blankly accepts 
and supports all of the military's 
policies. 

But you do go to drill and march 
around like mmdiess automotons 
or carefully crafted androids. The 



later has to give you courses 

|litary Iq^dt^rship and initiative 

in revive any lifelike 

fhe warm bodies it has 

fostered. 

mow nothing. You only 

follow orders. You do not question. 
This is the connection ROTC has 
/ith an inquisitive liberal e(i,uca-/, 
tion. Too bad, even so, your trai 
thought doesn't run on time. 

If you are an underclassman in 
ROTC, you are a real fanatic. "I'-Q^ 
going to go airborne armor," you 
say, "because on your dress uni- 
forms, you get to wear not only a 
long, sharp, shiny sword, but also 
silver spurs on your low quarter 
dress shoes." 

You buy cold beer at Eddie's, 
and then put it into your footlocker 
for three hours to let it warm up 
because "that's the way they drink 
it in Nam." Some of the more hip of 
you might even smoke pot, unbe- 
knownst to your ROTC leaders, but 
even then, it's only because you're 
in combat training for Nam and 
want to experience battlefield con- 
ditions. 

If you go to airborne school you 
don't even have to make five jumps 
to get your wings. You just have to 
complete four. If you don't make it 
down in one piece the fifth time, 
the army will mail your wings (reg- 
ular postage) home to mother. 

If you are an upperclassman, you 
might not be quite so fanatic 
because you have been caught 
signing your life away before the 





The lptter^3{^ects all of you 
tremendously. Some really gung-ho 
idQvil dogs drop out of ROTC once 
they learn their number is too high 

r them ever to be ^p^ to se, 
,nd some of you a^^^n r' 
lecause your numbe/'s up. a( 
'ou gotta go, go as an officer 
it's a good exercN 

pocricy. And off in the di§?ance 
you hear the s^ken sTrar»ds of 
Uncle Sam singing "r,v§j^^Your 
Number. " You certairTiynope he 
has some for you: it's pleasant to 
have at least some amenities that 
far from civilization. 

And after all, where would this 
country be without the military-in- 
dustrial complex? So kill for a 
better America. 

Some of you don't really have 
blood lust though: that's why you 
backed President Nixon when he 
sent forces into Cambodia and 
Laos to show the Hanoi govern- 
ment our great desire for world 
peace. 

And then some of you are only in 
ROTC to learn a good trade. One 
might even qualify to get a com- 
mercial pilot's license, or a river 
pilot's one. After all, what can one 
do with just a B.A. but drive an ice 
cream truck? At least in the armed 
forces, you can learn something 
that will be beneficial to you once 
you get out — if you get out. Like 
maybe: you could become a mer- 
cenary. 



the yat b-rat 

If you can remember when Eddies 
was called Kollege Korner, and the 
Hob Nob was Casamento's, you 
qualify as a neighborhood b-rat. 
You learned how to walk and skate on 
the oak-tree lined tennis courts where 
Butler House now is. You rapidly 
grew up to become the terror of the 
campus, the Creature from Audubon 
Park Lagoon, racing around on your 
Vroom bicycle, tripping up college 
students, acting generally obnoxious. 

After school every day, you used to 
rush straight over to Kollege Korner 
(remember?), drop your first quarter 
into the machines, and light your first 
Marlboro simultaneously. You 
practiced in front of a mirror for 
fifteen minutes a day to make sure 
you let your ciggie droop at precisely 
the correct angle. Kookie on "77 
Sunset Strip" was your idol. 

Then you'd go over to Newcomb quad 
to play football, knowing that the 
passing Newcomb girls (whom you'd 
like to make a pass at — "Where y'at, 
dawlin' ") were secretly eyeing your 
bronzed bod as you cocked your arm 
back for a pass, letting them furtively 
glimpse at the newly-grown tuft of 
underarm hair that proved you were 
now ALL MAN. 



Upon puberty, you, the neighborhood 
b-rat, can qualify as a Yat. As a young 
adult Yat, you are fairly easy to spot 
with the naked eye. Generally 
speaking, the male Yat is usually 
attired in faded blue jeans, the waist 
of which is placed between twelve 
and fifteen inches from the neck. 
Furthermore, a male Yat-in-heat is 
often seen carrying a pink or blue 
hair bruah which protrudes from the 
back pocket of his jeans. Generally, 
the male Yat will wear (along with his 
jeans) a chic Ban-Lon shirt with an 
alligator stitched on. Often though, 
male Yats can fool even the 
experienced Yat-watcher, for they 
may on rare occasions, be dressed in 
coat and tie. If by chance, the sight of 
eight feet of axle-greased, combed- 
straight-back hair doesn't give one an 
inkling that this may be a Yat, he may 
look for the minor trademark: white 
socks, usually worn with dark suits. 

The female Yat, though somewhat 
less colorful, is fairly easy to detect. 
One definite giveaway is fourteen feet 
of teased hair in combination with six 
falls (pronounce "Fawls"). But if she 
is not chewing gum (Juicy Fruit) or 
teasing her hair even more, she may 
not be a Yat at all, but rather just a 
Loyola student. 



Once you are accepted at Tulane, you 
try to deny your heritage by 
condemning everything you have 
NEVER been ashamed of. Your 1957 
metallic blue Chevrolet with mag 
rims, dual exhausts, Mardi Gras 
beads hanging from the rear-view 
mirror, defunct St. Christopher on the 
dashboard, and "Hell no, we ain't 
forgettin' " licence plates must give 
way to a Corvette or a Cougar at the 
least. Now the real transition; all your 
clothes must be altered. Your mother 
has to buy "Gant" labels for all your 
shirts, including the alligator Ban- 
Lons. Not only do you have to get rid 
of your white socks, you have to get 
rid of socks altogether. 

Next comes the complete personality 
take-over: you have to find a place on 
your head to put a part. The brush 
goes, and eventually the "security 
comb" you carried your first few 
months as a freshman. And then (the 
most unkind cut of all) you will be 
forced, by ridicule, to renounce your 
favorite chant, "Where y'at, ya 
motha?" "Where y'at?" is reserved 
for upper-class Westchester County 
residents who alone can make fun of 
this saying. Worst of all, you have to 
sneak in to .the Saints games so none 
of your new friends will see you. 




PAGE 34 / 



and the mole 

"I study, therefore I am." 
As a mole, you are very accustomed 
to night life. Not on Bourbon Sreet or 
in Eddie's or in any of the other 
symbols of the pseudo-decadence of 
New Orleans, but rather, locked up in 
your room, pouring over the delights 
of your medical or law tracts. 

Hauntmg, enchanting the little 
bald mole 

Are dim-lit halls, musty stalls. 
Sacred spell of book-smell. 

Undergraduates, or apprentice moles, 
can learn the basic techniques of 
your rare art easily — an utter disdain 
for fellow students (groundlings), a 
blank stare on your sleepless face as 
you gaze out at the world through 
your myopic haze, an almost 
complete inability to communicate 
with others. Who wants to talk about 
tort cases in loss of consortium or of 
the crisis of the aristocracy in 17th 
century England all the time? 

Your ability to criticize all aspects of 
the University are simply amazing. 
You criticize, but never participate in 
anything going on at Tulane. If you 
are a med student, you might go to 
football games: otherwise, you may 
as well be in Timbuktu. You live in a 
different world; more appropriately, 
cloud nine. You are already studying 
intently to become an absent-minded 
professor. 

What is really amazing about your 
dislike of the plebian student is that 
going to Tulane might be a step up 
for him and only a resting place 
before going on to a better graduate 
school, while your very being at 
Tulane in most of the graduate 
departments and professional 
schools usually means that you have 
been a failure elsewhere. 

You did go out on a date once — you 
remember, don't you? You brought 
her home right after the opera and 
rushed back to your room because 
you knew you could still get in 
another four or five hours of serious 
booking before turning in. 

You inhabit the library: some people 
think you just crawl out of the 



woodwork. You are not one of the 

regular second or third floor 
socialites, who go there only to make 
dates for Friday night or xerox 
someone's notes in the 
photoduplication room or flit around 
generally or go to the water fountain 
or the bathroom every fifteen minutes 
to spec out the new chicks who are 
also wandering around looking for a 
date for Friday night. Instead, you 
thrive in the carrells, in the rear 
typing stalls, on the fourth floor. 

You are not completely straight. You 
take speed — not to fly high, but to 
cram better. 

A hallmate once remarked of you, 
"This is the stuff professors are made 



of. " Strangely enough, you took it as 

a compliment. 

You would not degrade yourself by 
studying anything useful: if you are an 
expert in Chinese Ming dynasty vase 
distribution in the East African 
highlands, society should find a niche 
for you to fit in. After all. it is the duty 
of the scholar to research and to 
write: it is the duty of the society to 
accept those revelations the scholar 
deems fit to make. Unfortunately, this 
policy of yours has somewhat 
backfired. Last week, you placed an 
ad in the Times-Picayune: 

"For sale: One Philosopher. Cheap. 
Can Carp and can speak with pebbles 
in mouth. 865-771 1 , ext. 420." 







k 



^^ 



^'^♦' 










<l 



•N 



4 




, S 



v;. \ 



QO^ 



^:-i^ 



\< ^ 




emsis 




As Tulane University entered the 1970's, the 
outlook for its future seemed, in many ways, 
bleak. Tulane was not unique in having 
problems, of course. "The crisis of the 
private university" had already become a 
cliche during the late 1960's, as even the 
wealthiest schools began finding red ink 
on their ledgers. Costs for faculty salaries, 
staff wages, building construction, library 
purchases, student housing, etc., had 
increased much faster than the ever-rising 
tuition payments could match. The Vietnam 
war limited the amounts of Federal aid 



available after 1965, and the recession of 
1970 caused a further tightening of both 
Federal and private contributions. Tulane's 
endowment was much smaller than those of 
other leading Southern universities. 

In addition, of course, the student disruptions 
at countless schools, beginning about 1965, 
caused many more problems for all American 
higher education — physical destruction, 
hostility between students, and faculty, and 
administrators, polarization of opinions, and 
over-politicalization of education. At Tulane 
the amount of actual destruction and 
disruption was small; and in this respect the 
school was more fortunate than many richer 
and more famous institutions. But even here, 
the antagonisms created between various 
parts of the University community (especially 
over the case of mathematics Associate 
Professor Edward Dubinsky, fired in 1969 for 
his part in several campus disturbances) 
were often deep and divisive. (Moreover, 
alumni unhappiness over campus unrest, and 
over the entire youthful "counter-culture," 
was unlikely to increase their willingness to 
make the large contributions Tulane badly 
needed.) 

The effects of the financial squeeze at Tulane 
were evident — cutting back on the number of 
graduate degree programs, limiting the 
number of new instructors and professors, 
restricting the purchase of new equipment. 
Yet the nature of the crisis at Tulane, on the 
threshold of the 1970's, went deeper than just 
the lack of money. 

One aspect of the crisis could be seen In the 
results of the 1969 survey of graduate 
programs, sponsored by the American 
Council on Education. Of 24 Tulane graduate 
departments rated, none received either of 
the top two (out of six) possible ratings, and 
only four received the third highest rating, 
"Good". Most of Tulane's departments were 
graded only "Adequate" or "Marginal". In 
short, despite the reputation this University 
had long enjoyed as one of the foremost 



PAGE 38 / 



educational institutions in the South, the 
quality of its educational offerings was just 
not rated very highly by fellow professionals. 
And there could be no denying that during 
the 1960s, the quality of several important 
departments had deteriorated noticeably. 

A second aspect of the crisis could be seen 
in the report of a special committee of the 
American Association of University 
Professors, sent to Tulane to investigate 
whether standards of academic freedom had 
been violated by the dismissal of Professor 
Dubinsky. 

On the basis of the report, issued in 
December, 1970, it seemed unlikely that 
Tulane would be censured for its actions, but 
the committee was critical of the procedures 
followed by President Longenecker and the 
Board of Administrators in overriding faculty 
recommendations in the matter. More 
important perhaps, this outside committee 
found that the case had "Produced 
dissension and antagonism among different 
groups within the faculty, and on the part of a 
substantial portion of the faculty toward the 
administration and the governing board." and 
that this dissension had been "further 
aggravated by decisions on other matters." 
such as the graduate program reductions, the 
intensified athletics program, etc. 




"In our view," the investigating educators 
said, "if this dissension continues, it can have 
grave consequences for the effectiveness of 
Tulane University as an institution of higher 
education." 

Its financial problems alone did not seem 
likely to destroy Tulane, particularly if 
increased Federal aid should be resumed in 
the 1970's. Those problems could be faced 
and overcome, if the whole University 
community were to work together. But first 
there had to be a community. The 
disaffection among many faculty members. 



both old and young: the consequent 
departures of many outstanding teachers and 
scholars: the inability to attract top-caliber 
graduate students and administration: the 
growing isolation of the President from the 
rest of the University, both faculty and 
students — these and other related problems 
struck at the very life of the University. If not 
corrected or ameliorated before long, they 
indeed seemed able to plunge Tulane into a 
possibly fatal crisis. 

— Bruce Eggler 



/ PACE 39 






Seeds for the student owned and operated bookstore 

were planted somewhere in the midst of the spring 

events of the Tulane Liberation Front. More an 

attitude than actuality, the Mushroom sprang up 

impromtu in Student Senate Room B of the University 

Center. Its main attraction was low priced used 

books and records. Its purpose: to offer an 

alternative to the University bookstore. Routine 

returned after the dismissal of classes, but the 

Mushroom did not fade away. 








During the calm of the summer, the Mushroom was 
permanently located in Zemurray Hall in a former 
trunk storage room. Settled and recognized in 
September as an authorized student activity, the 
Mushroom, expanded and thrived. And 
establishment did not sour the attitude. 




Limited only by space and the restriction against 
selling new textbooks, the student manager and staff 
aim to serve the entire Tulane community. The 
atmosphere is informal: music plays as the customer 
browses for his books, records, film, threads, 
paraphenalia. Nobody is pressured. People who drop 
in to talk or to see what's new are as welcome as the 
student who dashes in just before closing time. 
Orders are placed for items which are not stocked. 

Despite a hesitancy within certain elements of 
Tulane to take advantage of the Mushroom's 
potential, a profit was recorded by the end of first 
semester. So, prices were further reduced and in 
early spring, air conditioning was installed. Cool 
attitude complemented by cool temperature — an 
unbeatable combination. 

Working through the Housing and Finance Office, the 
student-run operation can rely on the backing and 
the facilities of the University for assistance. The first 
managerial change comes up this summer, but no 
alteration of the store's character is anticipated. The 
Mushroom is now one year young; that must make it 
a perennial? 

—Pat Parks 
Newcomb '73 



PAGE 42 / 




/ pa«;e 4.3 



[DII1II[ 

iov[ or 











I 



"It was a vertical slab . . . perfectly sharp-edged and symmetrical, it was so black It seemed 

to have swallowed up the light falling upon it; there was no surface detail at all. It was 

impossible to tell whether it was made of stone or metal or plastic — or some material 

altogether unknown to man." 

Thus Arthur Clarke described the monolith in his book, 2007.- A Space Odyssey. It was around 

this crystalline slab that sub-human primates performed their first rituals which would for later 

man, become the techniques for realizing the Universe. How could such a shapeless form 

create within man the potential for exploring the Universe? 

The question could very well be asked about the very monolith which has deposited itself with 

tombstone precision across our campus. How can such a giant and featureless slab inspire 

scientists engaged in creative research to seek greater understanding of such a varied 

Universe? 

Affectionately termed the new science center, this structure spans the length of the campus 
along Freret Street and graces the entire academic Tulane campus with its imposing five 



PAGE 44 / 



stories. Effectively it slices the academic campus from the non-academic, not unlike a wall with 
several gates. As one architect commented, "Its a nice place to walk through." 

Historically speaking, the idea of improving science facilities at Tulane has been around since 
World War II. Not until 1964 however, did serious planning begin. With prospective funds in 
sight, two buildings which were to form a science complex were considered. What followed 
seems to be little more than bad planning and bad luck. In the absence of a campus 
development plan, a site was chosen, which proved to be aesthetically as well as structurally 
unsound. One University official estimated about a year's delay as a result of the relocation. 
Inflation and labor drain caused by Hurricane Betsy sent construction prices sky-rocketing. 
The plan for two units was dropped, and the new site on Freret was selected. 

The 1968 undergraduate bulletin showed the artist conception of the building, by then under 
construction, with the completion date listed as 1969. The building was not to be completed 
until two years later. Completion was set formally as March 1, 1971, but incomplete construc- 
tion and delays in furniture and equipment installation caused problems which resulted in 
delaying use of the building until the fall of 1971. By this time, a frightening financial situation 
had caused the University to cut back a number of items including an auditorium, a green 
house, an elevator, several environmental chambers, quite a few fume hoods, architectural 
concrete for the ends and second floor of the exterior, and some of the intercom, clock, and 
thermostat systems. Plans are still indefinite about the building of two more additional stories, 

which the foundations were laid to support. 

This varied and unfortunate history doubtlessly had a number of effects on the monumental 
design of the building, inside and out. Physics department Chairman Robert Morris believes the 
interior exhibits a distinct lack of design. Chemistry Professor William Alworth partially agrees. 
Alworth says even though the faculty was originally consulted about the lab design, the 
teachers were not consulted again after their plans had been revised. The chemistry 
researcher blames this as the reason for much of the superfluous equipment and furniture 
which complements a lack of other more essential items. 

One of those mostly responsible for the faculty input that went into the design is a biology 
professor, who today is considerably upset by the building. He is Dr. Frank Sogandares, who 
will be leaving this year partially because of the new science complex. "It's an insult, " he 
claims. "The move to the new building will be a move to mediocrity." Sogandares has been 
here 12 years, and served as coordinator for science planning before construction. He believes 
the building can only adequately accommodate two departments; but persistent deans, not 
familiar with scientific laboratories, have tried to "give everybody a piece of the cake." The 
well known biologist went on to say that the government may withdraw some of their support 
because of the building's inadequate animal facilities and substandard cages. 

Sogandares is understandably upset. If he were to move into the new building from his newly 

renovated lab in Richardson Memorial, he would lose nearly two-thirds of his present 
space — "a physical impossibility," he calls it. 

One of the departments which was moved in at the last minute was Physics. The entire 
department with the exception of Riverside facilities, a machine shop, lecture rooms, and a 
Newcomb departmental office will move into the building. Dr. Morris explains the new facilities 
are adequate; a great improvement over the present research facilities. The Physics 



/ PAGE 45 



department, with its departmental office, four undergraduate labs, and several advance 
research areas will cost the Chemistry department six research labs and an office. Chemistry 
will retain its freshman labs and lecture room in the chemistry building. 

Psychology, the fourth of the science quartet, is rather happy to find a consolidated home for 
its scattered department. Nevertheless, departmental Chairman Jack Buel intends to hold on to 
other psychology space currently held by that department. 

What then, considering these shortcomings, did Tulane get for its $6.8 million? Obviously since 
$5 million of that is Federal money, and the government only buys research labs, Tulane got a 
lot of lab, teaching, graduate, faculty, and research facilities. In fact, it is just a little astounding 
that the first academic building on campus since the 1930's has no class rooms. Architecture 
Professor Bill Turner explained what this means: Something less than desirable area is serving 
as renovated classroom facilities for Tulane. "But makeshift classrooms are the penalty we 
pay, until the government decides to start subsidizing them," he said. 

Aside from the labs, little money is being spent on new equipment, according to several 

teachers. "We will be sitting in nice new labs, but working with outdated equipment," 

complained one biologist. The Physics department gets no new equipment to speak of, 

according to Dr. Morris, who claims an eye will tiave to be kept on the old equipment brought 

in to make sure it's not outdated. Again, Sogandares comments, with limited janitorial service, 

old furniture, equipment, and overcrowded conditions, the place will resemble a slum. 

But where then, did the $6.8 million go? Another professor explained, "The designers told the 

architecturally-minded persons that the money was going into providing good labs and 

equipment, and they told the science professors that it was going to make an attractive 

exterior." There are some who feel neither was accomplished. Professor Turner describes the 

building as being "anonymous," having no great attraction, but also no great offense. "It's 

rather neutral," he claims, and he adds, "the best thing about it is the hole." Referring to the 

pedestrain plaza. Turner feels it is the only graceful thing about the structure. Graduate School 

Dean and University Provost David Deener likes the design. "The building represents the 

sciences." he once told a University forum. "It looks like a big computer card." Few would 

disagree on the last point. The temptation to paint "IBM" on the corner of the building is great. 

Despite its contemporary architecture, (or more likely, the lack of it), the building does have a 

number of good features. Tulane Resident Architect Edmond Bendernagle likes the staggered 

windows (including the ones assigned to the dark-rooms). The pastel interiors are nice, and 

each floor has a different color to help one distinguish the rather non-descript halls from each 

other. Turner likes the flexibilities which the design gives. 

Unlike the specialized buildings which rapidly become outdated, the center is as useful as a 

warehouse. Even Sogandares thinks the building is the most functional in Southeastern United 

States. Chemist Dr. Dwight Payne finds the slate topped benches, the wooden cabinets, and 



PAGE 46 / 



the new offices very attractive. However, it is perhaps Dr. Morris who found the most attractive 

aspect of the building: it offers an excellent opportunity for unity in the sciences; hopefully by 

co-operation among departments with similar inter-disciplinary interests. "Besides." he 

continued, "I've seen worse." 

Despite the debate about the design, it is obvious that the space can be nothing but a most 

welcome addition to an already overcrowded campus. It is unfortunate that a number of 

territorial disputes will accompany this building. This however, is not uncommon for any 

construction which fails to satisfy the needs of all the departments concerned. Perhaps the true 

test of the building will be its ability to unify the quests of man, and stress this co-operation 

over the imperfections of structure and space. Only when the structure of the "monolith" can 

be ignored and more introspection given to human achievment. can mankind begin to realize 

the Universe. 

— Robert Thompson 

A & S 73 



n 




II 



Ji li 



111 



AN EDITORIAL 



"A political resource is a means by which one person 
can influence the behavior of other persons; political 
resources therefore include money, information, food, 
the threat of force, jobs, friendship, social standing, 
the right to make laws, votes, and a great variety 
of things." 

— Robert A. Dahl, Modern 
Political Analysis 




The Tulane Board of Administrators is historically a self-perpetuating 
body composed of men who have represented the same relative power 
positions in the New Orleans business, civic, and social worlds since 
Tulane 's inception in 1882. They have consistently possessed the 
political resources necessary to influence the behavior of other 
persons. Inter-acting with each other in numerous firms, organizations, 
and activities, they have established interlocking relationships that 
allow them to communicate, influence, work, and associate with each 
other. Because of this inter-action, the channels for collective 
political action have been established. However, despite the potential, 
the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund do not act collec- 
tively and cohesively as the Tulane Board on political issues. Since 
these men possess the political resourecs to exercise individual power 
through other outlets, the Tulane Board is but a collective political 
power in dormancy. 




— Taken from "Power in Dormancy: 
A Study of the Tulane Board of 
Administrators as a Political 
Power," a research paper pre- 
pared for the Department of 
Political Science by Mark Davis 
and Steven Felsenthal. 



PAGE 48 / 



A Board Chart* 







V 


V 








V 




X 






y 






X 


METROPOLITAN AREA CO?.MITTEE 






X 


V 






X 


y 


X 






X 


y 








CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 






y( 


V 


X 






X 










V 




X 




COUNCIL FOR A BETTER LOUISIANA 








X 




X 














X 








BOARD OF LIQUIDATION CITY DEBT 






X 


X^ 






V 










y 


X 






^ 


INTERNATIONAL HOUSE 


X 


X 


V 


X 






X 










y 










UNITED FUND 






X 


y 
















X 


y 








OCHNER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL BOARD 








"x 














X 




X 


X 






AMERICAN RED CROSS 








V 


X 










X 














BUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH 








X 


















X 








SEWAGE AND WATER BOARD 






V 










X 












X 






METARIE PARK COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL 






X 








X 










y 










EDUCATIONAL T.V. FOUNDATION 








X 
















X 










INTERNATIONAL TRADE MART 




X 


X 


V 








V 


X 


X 






y 






X 


BOSTON CLUB 








X 






X 


X 










X 




X 




NEW ORLEANS COUNTRY CLUB 












V 












y 










TIMBERLANE COUNTRY CLUB 












X 












X 










LAKEWOOD COUNTRY CLUB 
















X 




X 






X 








LOUISIANA CLUB 


X 






V 






X 




















PICKWICK CLUB 








X 












X 














SOUTHERN YACHT CLUB 








X 








— 1 














X 




PLIMSOL CLUB 


in 

< 
< 

K 
W 
O 


o 

(-1 
Q 

o 

• 

Q 


W 

a 
w 

s 

K 
< 

Q 


a 

Q 
< 
o 

t-H 


a: 
o 

Q 
W 

« 

>-■ 

CQ 

w 
a: 


• 

>-^ 
K 

< 


►^ 

O 

a 

K 

P 

< 


W 

w 
w 

>-■ 

■3; 

tr 


W 

W 

< 

n: 

a 
w 

E-l 


>^ 
a 
a 

w 

a: 

Q 

a 

;^ 

Q 
W 


W 

M 

a 

a 


<s 



a 
< 

w 
a 

w 

(K 



Q 

to 

1— ( 


CO 
W 

a 


Eh 

o: 
tn 


W 

rc 

E-l 

HH 
10 
LO 

< 

C.I 


l-i 
w 

EH 
CO 

IX 

< 


Q 
W 


(X 

w 

:x 
u 
w 

< 

E-l 





* or — A Chart of the Board, or Who Belongs to What? 



/ PAGE 49 



\ 



^■^'(r^ ;•< 



Kfftf-^.! 



n-- ■♦■■ 



\ 





Who governs the university? Who 

should govern the University? The 
answer has yet to be established 
after almost 1000 years of the Uni- 
versity as an institution. In fact, the 
state of university governance is 
perhaps as much embroiled in con- 
troversy now as it has ever been. 
The controversy stems mainly from 
the desire of students to have a 
voice in the affairs of governance, 
a voice commensurate with the 
students' numbers, concern, and 
involvement. Inevitably, sugges- 
tions of such a radical departure 
from tradition give rise to heated 
feelings in the camps of all those 
intimately involved and makes res- 
olution of the question that much 
more difficult. 

Even as the controversy rages, 
though, it should be pointed out 
that the question of university 
governance is not one of over- 
riding concern to a great many 
persons, including students. In- 
deed, to the vast majority, the mere 
problem of determining just who 
makes the decisions now, is a dif- 
ficult enough question. Trying to 
understand the governance proce- 
dures of the University can best be 
described as an exercise in futility. 
Opinions vary from one that says the 
University is a hopeless bureau- 
cracy that is totally unresponsive to 
the needs of its members, to one 
that says the University is an effec- 
tive, although troubled, institution 
that is attaining new heighths. 
solving new problems, and re- 
sponding to calls for reform. 

The lack of interest on the part of 
students in the method of operation 
of the University stems primarily, I 
believe, from the fact that students 
have had so little involvement in 
university governance that they are 
not aware of the importance that 
student involvement can have in 
gaining not only student rights and 
freedoms, but also a voice in other 
university decisions that have been 
previously determined without 
benefit of student input. 

Until very recently, students en- 
tered college duly conditioned and 
programmed to the fact that they 
were to have little, if any, input into 
the operation of the institution. The 
job of governing and running the 
University was in the hands of pro- 
fessionals with elements of "de 
facto" control vested in the faculty. 
The student accepted such condi- 
tions on face value and for years 



blissfully ignored the entire state of 
affairs. That day is past. 

Students everywhere are beginning 
to assert their right to be involved 
in the decision-making process 
within the university, and students 
at Tulane are, again, no exception. 
After years of leaving the task of 
decision-making to others within 
the university, American students 
have realized that it is their own 
education that is hanging in the 
balance, and feel that it is time for 
student voices to be heard in the 
formulation of university policy. 

With the initiation of the movement 
for student participation in deci- 
sion-making, the structure and 
form of university governance 
systems have come full circle. It 
has taken 900 years for a fully 
cooperating form of governance to 
be proposed in universities. It is 
small wonder that higher education 
is constantly in crisis when one 
views the history and the 
development of university 
governance. The first western 
university was founded in Bologna, 
Italy, during the final years of the 
twelfth century. At the University of 
Bologna, the student guild 
controlled all aspects of institution 
except the determination of those 
persons eligible to teach. Beyond 
this one prerogative held by the 
teachers, students held an 
all-encompassing power 
that lasted for centuries, and 
although the teachers began to 
form guilds themselves, they were 
powerless to overcome the student 
guilds. By the sixteenth and 
seventeenth centuries, though, the 
resentment of the teachers, public 
pressure, and the availability of 
funds from sources other than 
students made it possible for the 
power to be transferred from the 
student to external governing 
bodies such as the Church or the 
city. In England at the same time, 
another pattern was emerging. 
There, power was transferred from 
the civic and church officials who 
had founded the educational 
institutions to the faculties of these 
institutions. Such a transfer of 
power meant that the faculty was in 
complete control of the institution, 
including the control of student life. 
Institutions founded in America, 
though, followed the example of 
the Scots and added another 
source of power and control, a 
governing body of laymen. The new 
American institutions left control of 



\A/HO 

SHALL 

GOVERN, 

NA/HO 
SHALL 

RULE? 

BY RALPH WAFER. 

STUDENT SENATE PRESIDENT, 

JUNE 1. 1970 to MAY 31, 1971 

student life in the hands of the 
faculty, but vested control of the 
institution in a board of laymen. 
Since that time, "de facto" power 
of the faculty has increased to the 
point where they effectively 
controlled the forming of academic 
policies. Concurrent was this rise 
in power of the faculty, the state of 
the student declined. Institutions of 
higher education took on a 
paternalistic air as the role of the 
student became more like that of a 
child, a ward of the institution. In 
such a patriarchial and autocratic 
environment the student was 
powerless to exert influence in any. 
but the most indirect methods. 
Finally by the end of the nineteenth 
century, students were being 
allowed to think and act for 
themselves, but only in their non- 
academic lives. In 1971 students 
are still fighting for control of their 
own lives, both in the academic 
and non-academic sphere. The 
resistance on the part of 
administration and faculty is not 
nearly so great, but until such 
power IS gained, there will be 
continuing pressure for reform. 

The goal of the student movement 
in this sense is not only student 
control of student lives, but also 
student voice in decision-making 
for the university. The goal is to 
have all constituencies of the 
university determine policy and 
goals rather than have any one 
constituency make determinations 
for the other. Justification for 
student involvement in the 
university decision-making process 
can be made in several ways. Dr. 
Earl McGrath, in Should Students 
Share the Power, provides six 
basic rationales for student 
participation in decision-making. 

/ PAGE 51 



WHO 

SHALL 

GOVERN, 

WHO 

SHALL 

RULE? 



One, if education is so important to 
life's well-being, and if students 
are to be recipients of the benefits 
of education, they should have a 
voice in determining its character 
and quality. Two, because of 
increased concern with their own 
education and concern over 
inadequacies of many university 
processes, student participation in 
governance offers much in the way 
of potential for the reform of higher 
education. Three, providing 
students opportunities for 
participation in university 
governance is a logical concept 
when considered in light of the 
purposes of a democratic society 
and the purposes of institutions of 
higher education within that 
society. Four, providing students a 
voice in academic bodies could 
bring instruction closer to what 
contemporary society requires that 
students learn and make higher 
education more relevant to the real 
needs of people. Five, students 
should have the right to govern 
their own lives, which can be 
provided by student participation 
in governance and the abolition of 
"in loco parentis." Six, because 
students are in such a unique 
position for the observation of 
teaching, they are perhaps best 
prepared to judge the teacher's 
fulfillment of his professional 
duties and obligations; therefore, 
the student's role in the evaluation 
reform of teaching should be a 
major one. 

In addition to Mr. McGrath's 
reasons, there are others, one of 
which is that the shared 
responsibilities of students, faculty, 
and administration of a joint 
authority creates a vehicle for freer 
communication and by including 
students, creates a much greater 
likelihood for responsible student 
involvement in university affairs. 
Another reason is that the 
increased communication inherent 
in cooperation between all groups 
generates better understandings 
and better feelings all around and 

PAGE 52 / 



significantly lessens the chance for 
misunderstanding. Thirdly, joint 
efforts at decision-making 
engender a community feeling 
which arises from participation in a 
common enterprise. Joint effort 
makes cooperation necessary; 
tolerance and respect for other 
groups and their opinions are 
required in order to make the 
concept work. An important 
underlying concept that supports 
student participation in university 
governance, though, is the concept 
that in a free society all those 
affected by a social policy have a 
right to a voice in its formulation. 
This concept is applicable to the 
formulation of policy and to the 
decision-making processes within 
institutions of higher education. 

The symbolic workhorse of 
university governance at Tulane is 
the University Senate, a body made 
up of administrative officers and 
deans, faculty members, and 
students. The total number of 
voting members is 48, with the 
largest group represented being 
the faculty with 30 members. There 
are four student members in the 
Senate, the 11 college deans, and 
the three top administrative 
officers of the University. In the 
origanizational structure of the 
University, the University Senate is 
the legislative body through which 
legislation must pass on its way to 
the President and the Board. 

The highest authority within Tulane 
is the University Board of 
Administrators, whose power is 
established by an act of the 
Louisiana State Constitution (Act 
43, 1884). The Board delegates 
authority to the President of the 
University, who in turn delegates 
much of his authority to other 
officers of the University, such as 
matters of admissions to the 
Director of Admissions, academic 
matters to the Deans of the 
respective college, athletics to the 
Director of Athletics, and financial 
matters to the Business Manager 
and Comptroller. 

The University Senate is 
empowered to make 
recommendations to the 
administration on all matters of 
general University concern as well 
as the right to review actions of any 
division of the University. If a 
Senate recommendation is not 
acceptable to the Board of 
Administrators, the Board must 



notify the Senate in writing of the 
reasons for its decision. All 
changes in academic policy that 
are of general University concern 
must be submitted to the Senate 
for consideration. The Senate may 
in turn delegate matters within its 
jurisdiction to its standing or its 
special committees. 

The committee structure of the 
University Senate is one of the 
wonders that is Tulane. There are a 
total of 20 standing committees, 
ranging from the Committee on 
Faculty Academic Freedom, 
Tenure, and Responsibility, to the 
Committee on Patents, to the 
Committee on Student Affairs, to 
the Committee on Admissions, to 
the Committee on Committees. 

Every conceivable function of the 
University is covered by a 
committee of one sort or another. 

True to the sense of bureaucracy 
by which all universities operate, 
the University Senate is not all 
adverse to referring things to 
committee. 

Students have direct input to 13 of 
the 20 University Senate 
committees by way of student 
members who are nominated and 
elected by the Student Senate. The 
Student Senate, by way of quick 
definition, is the duly elected 
governing body for the students at 
Tulane. It is comprised of 53 
senators, who are elected by a 
proportional representation system 
to represent the 1 1 colleges of the 
University. The Student Senate, 
although quite large, is not nearly 
so bogged down in procedure as 
the University Senate. The Student 
Senate has eight standing 
committees which it uses rather 
infrequently, choosing to conduct 
most of its business on the floor of 
the Senate. As a result, the Student 
Senate is guilty of some extremely 
long meetings, but because the 
meetings are generally informal 
and Robert's Rules are largely 
ignored. Student Senate meetings 
are not nearly as stultifying as 
those in the University Senate. The 
Student Senate's relationship with 
the University Senate, other than 
the four student members of the 
University Senate, is through the 
Student Affairs Committee. This 
committee, a group of 15 faculty 
and staff and five students, is 
advisory to the Dean of Students 
and to the University Senate on 
matters dealing with student 
affairs. By playing this role, the 



committee is constitutionally 
empowered to deal with many 
matters that come out of the 
Student Senate involving such 
things as conduct, housing, and 
student organizations. 

A redeeming factor of the 
committee system of the University 
Senate is the frequent 
independence of some of the 
committees in regard to issues or 
questions over which they feel they 
have jurisdiction. In many cases a 
committee will consider a matter 
on its own initiative, or on the 
request of another party within the 
University. The more traditional 
method of placing a matter before 
a committee is for it to be referred 
by the University Senate. The more 
industrious committees do not wait 
for such a referral from the Senate 
to begin work as they strive to find 
their own issues to consider. Other 
committees are not so eager to 
work and are quite content to do 
nothing until the Senate requests 
them to act. 

A non-redeeming factor of the 
University Senate committee 
system lies with those inactive 
committees that seem determined 
to meet as infrequently as possible 
and to steer clear of any and all 
controversial matters. In several 
cases the inaction of a committee 
is due to the fact that it might deal 
only with an annual event, such as 
the awarding of honorary degrees, 
the aegis of the Committee on 
Honors, or graduation and 
commencement, the aegis of the 
Committee on Academic 
Ceremonies. But in many other 
cases the inaction is the result of a 
resolution by the committee to 
meet rarely and to do nothing. 

Student participation on University 
Senate committees has had 
noticeable effect in many 
committees, in the sense of helping 
create a more active committee. 
The primary reason any committee 
is active is due to the desire for 
involvement of the chairman, but 
probably the second most 
prominent reason is the desire for 
participation and activity of the 
student members. Unfortunately, 
the enthusiasm of student 
members is quite limited due to the 
very small number of students on 
University Senate committees. The 
majority of committees with 
student membership have only two 
student members, with a typical 
faculty membership of about ten. 



Such a minority of students makes 
it very difficult for effective student 
participation, especially when the 
rest of the committee wants to 
meet as infrequently as possible. 
Basically, though, such a 
proportion of students to faculty is 
really nothing more than tokenism 
masquerading as student 
participation. 

The problem of determining the 
proportion of student membership 
on any committee of the University 
Senate is a difficult one. At present 
there is no rationale at Tulane for 
determining the student proportion 
on committees. On those 
committees which have student 
representatives the average 
proportion is 20 per cent. The most 
student on any committee is five on 
the Student Affairs Committee, 
which is 25 per cent of that 
committee, but two is the more 
common number. 

One proposition that is put forth by 
some theorists in the field of 
university governance is the 
concept of "one man, one vote," 
for the basis on which to determine 
the make-up of university 
governing bodies. This theory is 
based on the notion that in a 
completely democratic society in 
which all electors are 
presumptively qualified to cast 
their ballots, the Supreme Court 
doctrine of one man. one vote is 
the doctrine to follow. Realistically, 
though, in a university setting the 
doctrine of "one man, one vote" is 
inherently unfair as it would 
transfer the power from the Board, 
the administration, and the faculty 
to the students, or as some others 
might submit, to the alumni. 
Several other reasons can be 
submitted to invalidate a proposal 
such as one man, one vote in the 
university setting, but vesting all 
the power in students, who are by 
definition a transcient group, 
violates the stability necessary for 
the operation of a university. 

Another proposition that is put 
forth concerning university 
governance does have much 
credibility is the abolition of the 
concept of "student 
government "as it applies to 
modern colleges and universities. 
The connotation of "student 
government" is inconsistent with 
the present conception held by 
students of their role m the 
governance of an institution. The 



concept of "student government" 
accentuates the mythical 
separation of education taking 
place outside of the classroom as 
well as inside. "Student 
government" perpetrates an 
artificial separation between two 
aspects of a student's life that 
should not be separated, that is. 
his life inside the classroom and 
out. The concept of "student 
government" and the practice of it 
violates the whole concept of 
community. A proponent of student 
participations strongest argument 
is based on the concept that all 
members of the University 
community have a right to share in 
the formulation of the rules and 
laws under which they shall live. 

Taking into consideration what has 
been said so far and the 
implications it has for Tulane. the 
logical conclusion is that there is a 
need for a master plan for student 
participation. To date students are 
included on many University 
committees, but there is no reason 
for the number of students on each 
committee. Students are members 
of the University Senate, but in 
such a small minority that the mere 
numbers of faculty and 
administration present can be a 
very numbing experience and can 
make effective participation 
extremely difficult. The other 
conclusion that becomes apparent 
is the great desirability of creating 
at Tulane a community 
government, suited to Tulane. and 
abolishing in name and symbolic 
importance of "student 
government" or. for Tulane. the 
Student Senate. The Student 
Senate will almost always be 
needed to serve as a forum for 
opinion of the students as well as 
coordinator of student activities, 
but for the purposes of 
government, hopefully the Senate 
will no longer be needed. The new 
form of government for Tulane 
would be nothing more than 
putting on a sound basis the 
concept of student participation in 
University government. To effect 
the change in government requires 
two things; one. an infusion of 
students, and two. a basis for the 
proportion of student membership. 

The proportion of students on 
University committees varies 
greatly at Tulane. The highest 
proportion is 40 per cent on the 
Committee for the Academic 
Freedom and Responsibility of 

/ PAGE 53 



WHO 

SHALL 

GOVERN, 

WHO 

SHALL 

RULE? 



students, and the lowest is 15 per 
cent on the Committee on Health 
Services. Of course there are many 
committees where the proportion is 
zero per cent because there are no 
student members. Due to the fact 
that many committees have 
functions that are not directly 
concerned with students, it makes 
sense not to have the same 
percentage of students on all 
committees. Those committees that 
have the greatest degree of 
relevance to students should have 
the largest percentage of student 
membership, but that percentage 
should be established. 

There are three committees whose 
functions deal almost solely and 
directly with students: the 
Committee on Student Affairs, the 
Committee on Housing and Food 
Services, and the Committee on 
Academic Freedom and 
Responsibility. A 40 per cent 
student membership already exists 
on the latter committee, and using 
that as a basis, student 
membership on the other two 
should be increased to equal 40 
per cent of the membership. 
Student membership on the 
Student Affairs Committee should 
continue to increase beyond the 40 
per cent established here because 
that committee is the most 
important one when it comes to 
dealing with University rules 
affecting students' lives. 

There are a great many other 
committees within the University 
Senate structure that should have 
increased student participation. 
The percentage of student 
membership proposed for these 
committees is 33 per cent. The 
basrs for this comes naturally from 
the tripartite make-up of the 
committees, but attempts to 
equalize the divisions somewhat 
At present the University Senate 
constitution states that fulltime 
research and teaching faculty must 
comprise 75 per cent of a 

PAGE 34 / 



committee membership, exclusive 
of voting student members, and 
where otherwise not provided for in 
the by-laws. This ruling could still 
stand and absorb the new concept 
for determining proportion of 
student membership. Committees 
that would fall under the 33 per 
cent rule would be such 
committees as the Committees on 
Libraries. Admissions. Educational 
Policy, Health Services, and others. 

For those committees that have 
only an indirect effect on students, 
student membership equal to 25 
per cent is proposed. The basis for 
this is that 25 per cent of a total 
committee membership would go 
beyond the current token student 
memberships that now exist on 
many committees, but would not 
necessitate a complete shift in the 
make-up of the committee. 
Committees that the 25 per cent 
would apply to are: Committees on 
Academic Ceremonies. Budget 
Review. Physical Facilities, and 
Honors. On one University Senate 
committee, the Committee on 
Faculty Tenure, Freedom, and 
Responsibility, a student 
membership of two, or 17 per cent 
is proposed. The small student 
membership is determined by the 
importance of the committee in 
regard to faculty rights. The 
student voice is required on the 
committee for the reasons given 
earlier, specifically those relating 
to the students' unique opportunity 
to observe the performance of a 
faculty member as a teacher. There 
are other committees on which a 
small percentage or perhaps even 
no student membership is 
proposed. Committees such as the 
Committee on Faculty Benefits, 
Committee on Patents, and the 
Committee on Research might 
have two "token" students in 
recognition of the prerogative of 
faculty rights, but also in keeping 
in mind the need for student 
participation in faculty affairs just 
as faculty participate in student 
affairs. 

In the University Senate itself, it is 
proposed that student membership 
be increased from the present four 
to 20. This large increase is 
dictated by the need for 
representativeness and for 
effectiveness. The system that 
would be established for electing 
students to the University Senate 
would be a proportional 
representation system operating 



within the Student Senate. Based 
on the number of fulltime students, 
just as faculty are elected based on 
fulltime faculty, the proportional 
representation system would place 
the emphasis on the college or 
division, rather than the Student 
Senate at-large. The Student 
Senate would be an important 
element in the selection process, 
but the concept of the Student 
Senate being the students' only 
legitimate spokesman would be 
dispensed with by putting the basis 
of power back in the separate 
colleges. The Student Senate 
would then serve to bring the 
colleges together, but not to usurp 
their positions. The basis for the 
college's representation would be: 
one to 500 fulltime students — one 
representative; 501-1500 fulltime 
students — two representatives: 
1501-2500 fulltime students — three 
representatives. This would 
produce 16 representatives. In 
addition the Student Senate will 
elect three members of the Student 
Senate Executive Cabinet to serve 
on the University Senate. (The 
Executive Cabinet is the four 
officers of the Senate plus the 
Chairmen of CACTUS and the 
University Center Programming 
Board.) The Student Senate will 
also elect one member of the 
Student Senate Coordination 
Board to serve on the University 
Senate. (The Coordination Board is 
made up of the chairmen of the 
seven Student Senate standing 
committees). The total number 
elected to serve would then be 20. 
In comparison, there are 30 faculty 
members on the University Senate, 
11 deans, and three University 
administrative officers. With the 
addition of 20 students the total 
Senate membership would become 
64, giving students just over 30 per 
cent of the membership. This is in 
line with the concept of committee 
membership that would fluctuate 
from 25 per cent to 40 per cent. 

Ten of the persons elected to serve 

on the University Senate would 
also serve on the University Senate 
Committee on Student Affairs. The 
reason for this is the fact that a 
great percentage of the legislation 
that comes from the Student 
Senate must go to the Student 
Affairs Committee and thence to 
the University Senate. Hopefully 
this outmoded method of dealing 
with student decisions will be 
discarded in favor of letting 
student decisions be made by 




students or by the appropriate 
University official. By effecting 
such a change in policy, the 
Student Affairs Comniittee would 
not spend the better part of a year 
debating a matter such as 
dormitory visitation hours, which 
then had to go to the University 
Senate, and then to the Board of 
Admmistrators. The four persons 
elected from the Executive Cabinet 
and the Coordination Board to 
serve on the University Senate 
would automatically serve on the 
Student Affairs Committee as 
would six of the 16 other University 
Senators. The six would be elected 
by the Student Senate after the 
elections for positions in the 
University Senate had taken place. 
The elections for the University 
Senate might also take place in the 
Student Senate, but only among 
the senators from a respective 
college rather than the Senate at- 
large. The other possibility is that 
when each college holds its 
elections for the Student Senate a 
provision be made to determine the 
senators for the University Senate 
at the same time. 

Without question this proposal 
constitutes a radical change in the 
form of University governance 
employed at Tulane. Without a 
need for constitutional change, 
though, an effective operating 
community government can be 
installed to take the place of a 
government that approaches the 
concept of community, but falls 
woefully short. The improved 
communications made possible by 
including students in decision- 
making has shown its worth this 
year. To stop the process now 
would have negative effects in the 
very near future. What needs to be 
done is to go forward with the 
community government concept 
and install it at Tulane. The 
benefits of showing such a 
confidence in the abilities of the 
student body would certainly be 
shown in increased responsibility 
on the part of students. When 
students know the stakes at hand 
and are allowed to carry their 
share of the load, their perspective 
of the institution and its problems 
changes, and a total community 
effort to improve the quality of 
institution can ensue with much 
fewer obstacles to overcome than 
if students are cast in the role of 
second class citizens not eligible 
for full citizenship such as now 
exists at Tulane. 





/discovery 
and 
diffusion/ 



It usually starts In Preservation Hall, 
one door away from Pat O'briens. In 
many cases, the initial jazz encounter 
occurs during the same week that a 
student first arrives in New Orleans. But 
when and where the student finds or 
pursues the music during his years in 
New Orleans and at Tulane will depend 
on his own curiosity, on luck, and often 
on the development of his own interest 
and understanding of the musical form 
and its traditions . . 




... In the city, the situations where 
the music is played and the reasons 
for playing it will vary, A brass band 
will turn out for a convention, a festival, 
a funeral, or to welcome the Delta 
Queen at dockside (for what was to 
have been her last visit to New Orleans. 
A recent federal dispensation, however, 
has allowed the riverboat to continue 
its service along the Mississippi). The 
New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Fes- 
tival, held each spring, will bring out 
the silver-haired Bill Russell, the former 
curator of the Museum of New Orleans 




PAGE 58 / 







Jazz, to entertain in Congo Square The 
same festival will also feature a concert 
aboard another riverboat with the most 
articulate drummers in New Orleans. 
Lovig Barbarin . . . 

. . . and perhaps the smoothest clarine- 
tists in the person of Pete Fountain. 
Emcee for the evening, a Georgian 
named Allen . . Back in Congo 
Square, one can find the unique Bongo 
Joe, switching his role to piano, while 
Dizzy Gillespie assists on the oil drum 
Further, one will meet a man named 
■Fats", with a derby & a sash that's 
labeled "Olympia." 



/ PAGE 59 




... On the Tulane Campus, variety 
is again the password. On the right 
night, one can catch an earful of Ger- 
man Jazz in der Rathskellar. or the "big 
band" sound of Lee Hoppes Tulane 
Stage Band. But live performances 
don't have to be limited to a stage; 
Somehow, WTUL managed to get Dizzy 
Gillespie into their studio for a live in- 
terview in April. Recorded interviews 
and other historical data can be found 
in the Jazz Archive on the fourth floor 
of the Howard-Tilton Library. There, 
one will again meet Richard Allen, who 
serves as the curator for the archive. 

But to reach a greater awareness of 
the entire jazz theatre in New Orleans. 
try sitting in on the Music department 
course. "The History of Jazz." Taught 
by John Joyce, the class (and its two 
sections) have been averaging over 70 
students in each section; although the 
course has many complexities, the 
main result which Joyce strives for is 
an awareness of musical "perception 

. . Perhaps the best way to under- 
stand the New Orleans jazz tradition is 
to meet and talk with a member of one 
of the brass bands (usually a member 
who is over 55 or 60 years old). Cur- 
rently, the man to see on the Tulane 
campus is Matthew "Fats" Houston, an 
employee for the Physical Plant since 
1946. The same "Fats" Houston leads 
almost every major jazz parade or fu- 
neral as the Grand Marshal for the 
Olympia and Eureka brass bands. 

"Fats" can recall the jazz rage back 
in the "horse and carriage" period, but 
began to get involved in jazz groups 
in the mid-forties: 

"I began to organize my band at the 
end of World War II. I played from one 
group to another until I organized my 
own band. I played with Louis Dumaine, 
and after he died. I organized the group 
that was left into Matthew Fats' Hous- 
ton's Dixieland Jazz Band. I played up 
here in the University vicinity, at the 
different fraternities, the SAE. the ATO. 
the Kappa Sigma. I played Dixieland 
Jazz until rock and roll broke out. When 
that happened, every job that I bid on, 
they would tell me, I can get two rock 



/ PAGE 61 



I 

I 





PAGE 62 / 



and roll bands for the price that you 
want, Fats' I said, ■Well, you can get 
the rock and roll!' So that's when I took 
my drums and put them up in my living 
room, on the side. They're still stored 
there. 

After that, I started to grand marshal. 
I grand marshalled with the Eureka. We 
buried Picou first, then Papa Celestin 
died. (Papa Celistan had the biggest 
funeral, then Picou had the next big- 
gest funeral that I grand marshalled 
with the Eureka.) Then Bill Matthews 
died— he was one of the Eureka. Then 
the trombone player died. He was an- 
other one of the original Eurekas. And 
we buried Kid Clayton. Finally, so many 
died out— there were only one or two 
left. There was Percy Humphery, he 
was the leader. He would sometimes 
borrow some of the men from the 
Olympia, and would make up a band. 
He would bring them together for a 
special show or occasion. But after 
that, I joined the Olympia myself, and 
on up to now, I'm still with the Olympia 

. . . Jazz is still part of my life, and 
I love it. I will love it until I die. I want 
to be put away with the next biggest 
funeral that we have in New Orleans. 
The last big one was with Cap'n Handy. 
We buried him in Pass Christian. Be- 
tween seven and nine thousand people 
participated in that parade . . . 

. . . The jazz funeral means the old 
tradition that if you pass, you want to 
be waked. At the church we march out 
with a dirge, and if the cemetery's 
close, we'll march on for a few blocks 
with a dirge, then we'll turn the proces- 
sion loose, and let it go When they get 
about three blocks out of sight, that's 
when they start the rejoicing. 

With a boom, boom, boom, they start 
playing 'When the Saints Go Marching 
In. The old folks still feel the same way 
about jazz but the young-folks they go 
for the new feelings in their rock and 
roll and modern jazz . . . 

... My whole life, I've been playing 
jazz. I still love jazz. I expect to die. 
and want to be buried with a traditional 
jazz funeral ..." 

Matt Anderson 

Engineering '71 




/ PAGE 63 




DORMS 



^ 



# 



PAGE 64 / 




Nearly half the dormitory residents in men's 
housing are freshmen. The other residents live on 
campus because it is more convenient and possibly 
more financially reasonable. This year all men 
above the freshman level were given the option of 
living off-campus. Because many already "lived" in 
fraternity houses and elsewhere off-campus, and 
because off-campus housing is generally scarce and 



expensive, there was no giant exodus. Men's housing 
was operated at capacity level all year. 

Dormitory residents who complain about their housing 
are usually freshmen. "Its a drag.' The visitation hours, 
which prescribe times during which women can visit in 
the rooms, have been restricted to Friday. Saturday, and 
Sunday evenings from noon until 2 a.m. This has been 
the biggest frustration of the residents. To some extent 



/ P.4GE 65 



these frustrations will be removed when more liberal 
hours and weekday privileges are put in effect. 

Other "hassles" in dormitory living include excessive 

noise and dope. For the most part noise levels are 

moderate, and students are able to study in their rooms. 

Residents seem fully capable of putting pressure on the 

low noise level deviant and there are few problems. 

Dope is another bag of its own. Generally speaking, 

men have not smoked in the dorms. After the early fall 

Conduct Committee cases resulting in stiff fines and 

probation, there was little discernable activity in the 

rooms. Besides, watching the stars on the University 

Center quadrangle while turning on appears to make 

people much happier. The dorm room is too confining 

and an adviser might get nasty. Rumor has it that there is 

one hall in Monroe where it's all a different story. . . . 

Campus living can be as good, or as bad, as the 

residents want to make it. The mechanism and financing 

are available for a variety of social events. Advisers, 

being students themselves, generally are aware of 

student problems. They can be especially helpful to the 

freshman, not so much as an answer man, but more as a 

"where-you-can-find-out" man. 

If a student lives in a dorm because that is what he wants 

it is not unpleasant. If one lives on campus because he 

has to live on campus, there results a frustrated resident. 

Frustrated residents only frustrate other residents. There 

are more than enough frustrations as a student, and 

dormitory living should not add to the list. 

— Richard Bretz 

G.B.A. 72 





PAGE 66 / 




/ PACE 67 




"The residence halls of Newcomb College continue to be a part of the 

organizational structure of the College. . . . Regulations for the Newcomb 

residence hall . . . are matters of special concern of the 

College. . . . The Senate Committee on Student Affairs may inquire and 

recommend to the Senate concerning policies in student life matters 

throughout the University; consideration of any recommendation affecting 

Newcomb College should include recognition of the concern and structure 

that exists for these matters within the College." 

University Senate Resolution 
March, 1971 



PAGE 68 / 



Newcomb dormitory regulations 
change, but not with the times. 
Since the members of the Class of 
1971 passed the compulsory 
examination on the rules and 
regulations of resident student in 
the fall of 1967. many of the 
restrictions with which the 
examination was concerned have 
been eliminated, but the principle 
upon which the rules — and the 
tests — are based, continue 
unchanged. According to the 
constitution of the Resident 
Government Association, one of 
the purposes of the restrictions is 
the "regulation of social activities 
in order to protect the welfare of 
each student and to obtain 
development of individual honor 
and the best result in scholarship." 
The Newcomb woman must be 
looked after. 

The changes, as listed, sound very 
impressive. Instead of the weekday 
1 a.m. curfew, upperclassmen now 
have self-regulated hours, and 





most own keys to their dormitories. 
They are no longer required to sign 
in and out every time they wish to 
leave the dorms after 8 o'clock. 
Freshmen curfews have been set 
back two hours, so that on 
weekdays, they may return at 1 
o'clock instead of having to check 
in at 1 1 p.m. Men are allowed into 
the women's rooms on week-ends, 
within the hour limits set by the 
college. 

Yet it becomes necessary to ask 
why the rules are there in the first 
place. They are not needed. 
Newcomb women are mature 
individuals. By the time they enter 
the University, their personalities 
are basically developed, and their 
character already formed. If their 
interests in Newcomb are not 
academic, no rules will ever 
change that. And if they intend to 
make their years in the college a 
fulfilling intellectual experience, 
they will know how to find the 
resources needed for this without 
having to be directed to them. 



/ P.VGE 69 





PAGE 70 / 



There has been, in fact, no 
noticeable change in the individual 
honor or the academic output of 
Newcomb students since the 
relaxation of the dormitory 
regulations. The Newcomb 
administration, in allowing the 
reforms, showed confidence in the 
women's maturity and 
responsibility, and have found out 
that their confidence was not 
misplaced. But there are still rules, 
too many rules, which prove only 
that the administration's trust is 
only partial. And the administrators 
have made it clear that new 
changes are not likely to occur in 
the next two years. 

If the need is felt for social as well 
as academic guidance for 
Newcomb students, especially 
freshmen, then the administration 
should look to the dormitory 
adviser program, not to dormitory 
regulations, as a positive way of 
providing it. If a student has 
problems, she will not find the 
solution for them in a set of rules, 
but in a set of well-trained, 
capable, responsible individuals 
willing to respond to their needs. 
The adviser system, in the past 



year, has been reworked to do just 
that. The rules, as they stand, are 
superfluous and, for the most part. 
they are resented. 

Ironically, some of what may be 
considered the strictest regulations 
imposed upon the women are 
almost impossible to enforce 
efficiently. It takes little skill to 
devise methods of entering and 
leaving the dormitories without 
ever needing to sign in or out. The 
sign out sheets, on the other hand, 
help no one by stating that the 
student is "in town " or "on 
campus." and create only even 
more useless paper work. 

Often the rules are confusing. 
Freshmen are allowed two key 
nights a week, a regulation which 
has led the house mothers often to 
wonder whether a particular 
Sunday key night should be 
counted with those of the week the 
Sunday ended, during which the 
student took no key nights, or with 
those of the week which the 
Sunday began, in which the 
student took two. Should the 
student be punished with countless 
calldowns for taking an illegal 



keynight. or congratulated for 
keeping her numbers straight? Or, 
to ease the complex situation, 
should Sundays be made 
independent entities and no part of 
the week at all? 

The time is overdue for 
reevaluation and redefinition. 
Newcomb College is not now what 
it was five or even two years ago. It 
is educating a new breed of 
students who do not particularly 
want to think of Newcomb as one 
of the "Seven Sisters of the South." 
They wish the emphasis to be 
placed on student-faculty- 
administration communication, not 
condescention. 

Slowly, the past years have seen 
the parental walls of the Newcomb 
fortresses tumble. Like all solidly 
built medieval institutions, 
however, the structure is not easy 
to destroy. Before reconstruction 
can begin. Newcomb students, it 
seems, will have to wait until 
erosion overcomes the remaining 
walls. 

— Ileana Oroza 

Newcomb 71 






for: fiirfh control infcrn.afiC 
Or -fo Kau* Ol prtqnancu -k 
- Qo "h) Dr. SeasTrunck;^ <m 
rt^c second, floor' of -H^t 
f4«CLlt-h Center' — ihe. 



' Counceii'>^Ci J FSyCh.alr.t 
Seciion ^-- call eni. 2SI 
Onrt ask for hin] 

^ fJoT go +* ih€ reaular 
nwdtcaL c/paK .' 




^auLtl\i'\, OMcL discuss Jui. 






'■ 



"V 



I '.'* ' 



/ PAGE 71 





f TlIENEWOKLEAI«SCatOiJI>,in.iMi»^ MI^IXON 

f ''VICTIMS ©F DUTViA-^"-"^"") 

I iMVIL II Ihrwifh :». >l«l)ll:i rxrrpt Mnmlny * Wnliit-Mli»; mrulo OiUI RM. 

it terwllTh|i*In-*i»V«.i«iurT<mSl.l%««'»HT«>rlrr«..V^«rt™i»« 

I adndHdwdXJe a<adnuji«I.IHt rmrmulowiXK>'«7IX.IX«Mi-l«MIKM. 




Like most major universities in the United States, 

Tulane lias had its share of campus unrest. Unlil<e 

other campuses, however, Tulane has yet to witness 

bloodshed or over-reaction by campus or municipal 

authorities. The man responsible for keeping the 

peace on the Tulane campus. Director of Security 

Robert Scruton, has won the admiration of students, 

the respect of most faculty members (in itself, no 

mean accomplishment), and consideration of his 

viewpoint by the University administration. 

The Colonel, as he is called, is a study in complexity. 

He's a retired army officer who rose from the ranks; 

he's an accomplished tennis player; he won a 

shipboard costume contest by dressing as Tiny Tim; 

he's a man with a theatrical sense of timing that can 

provide good copy for any campus newspaper 

reporter. 

Scruton's a difficult man to work for. Many officers 

have quit the force in disagreement with the Colonel 

or his policies. Students faced with multiple traffic 

offences get a taste of his "sting 'em a little" 

policy — reducing the fine so that it still hurts, but it 

does not bankrupt the student for the rest of the 

semester. The vast majority of Tulane students, when 

involved in a security matter, come away impressed 

by the fairness and helpfulness of the security 

department. 
PAGE 72 / 



From Tulane's first anti-ROTC demonstrations 

staged by the theatre department, to the 

Dubinsky — ROTC demonstrations to the birth of the 

Tulane Liberation Front and the ROTC barracks fire 

in the spring of 1970, Scruton has competantly and 

efficiently handled the situation without recourse to 

excessive force. Scruton's calmness and good sense 

are credited by many with saving the day during the 

T.L.F. occupation of the University Center. He was 

the one voice of moderation who would not close the 

U.C. and evict the demonstrators. 

Observing the Colonel is a study of a man under 

pressure. The nature of his job subjects him to 

pressures from faculty, staff, students, 

administration, alumni, and the community. As such, 

he is perpetually out on a limb. Only his flexible 

attitude and uncanny sense of what each special 

interest group will tolerate has kept Scruton's 

position reasonably secure. When asked what he 

would like to be remembered for after he leaves 

Tulane, Scruton replies: "well, I think the biggest 

accomplishment would be simply having been able 

to survive in this job with all the pressures on me." 



-Bill Klinkenstein 

G.B.A. '71 




SCRUTON ON TULANE STUDENTS: "Tulane students are much smarter, less 
docile, they want to know why and wherefore, far more curious . . . they don't 
like a lot of bullshit and crap thrown at them.' 



SCRUTON ON THE SECURITY DIVISION:". . . a force of ten or twelve 
seasoned officers can serve the University well. The word "seasoned" bears repe- 
tition. Seasoned." (Tulane Self-Study. 1967-1968) 



SCRUTON ON SCRUTON: "Fortunately. 1 can see the funny side of everything, 
no matter how serious a situation can be. A sense of humor is a saving grace to 
keep you going in this job. . . . As long as I'm here (and this is a natural thmg) 
theforce will represent what I want it to be. . . . A great part of my life was 
devoted to dealing with young people — not young students, but young soldiers— 
basically they're not much different. They can spot a phoney at a thousand 
yards. . . . I've always said, that when I do quit, its going to be under the most 
favorable conditions when things are going smoothly and everything is runnmg 
right so I can turn over a going organization to my successor." 



/ PACE 73 




THE GOMPLEAT 



. . . at Tulane, a campus officer needs to be 
competent in 17 different skills. He must be prepared 
to exercise his competence at any time, so varied are 
the situations he must contend with. 

He must be taught enough practical law so that he 
does not ensnarl the university in a legal action 
because of his ignorance. He must be taught the 
rights of others in police procedure. 

He must be taught how to handle a wild drunk or a 
deranged person, male or female. Such techniques 
are not learned overnight. Neither are the special 
ways of dealing with teenage deliquents. 

He must be shown how to put out a fire, and when 
to call the fire department, and what to do when the 
engines arrive, and how to deal with toxic smokes 
generated by fires. 

He must know about drugs and narcotics, the 
stimulants and the depressants— enough so that he 
can recognize abnormal behavior and the reason for 

it. 

He must know how to help an injured person, what to 
do for that person and where to take him. 

He must be taught how to write a proper parking 
ticket and a speeding ticket. And he must be shown 
how to investigate an accident. 

He must be shown how to write a proper report, 
factual and objective, why reports are important and 
why they should be reasonably literate. 

He must be taught to understand the nature of young 
people, young students, and why some are perhaps 





not as orderly as they should be. He must be trained 
to be neither over-harsh nor over-easy in dealing 
with their pranks and high jinks. He must be taught 
to understand that matters are not always black or 
white but often are "gray" and hard to define. It must 
be explained to him that some persons make a 
practice of baiting or insulting police, and that this is- 
aimed not so much at the officer as a person, but at 
the symbol of law and order in general. 

He must be taught courtesy — a firm politeness under 
any and all conditions. He must be shown that an 
officer who descends to rudeness and brutality even 
in dealing with human trash is a poor officer and a 
liability to his unit. 

He must be trained to deal witl;i sexual deviates, to 
know that often such people are less criminal that 
"sick" in mind. He must be shown about fingerprints, 
how to lift them from evidence and transfer them to 
photographs or tape for comparative purposes. He 
must be taught the techniques of elementary 
investigation and interrogation, and the rights of 
persons undergoing questioning. He itiust be taught 
how to operate the high-speed camera equipment 
used to make identification cards, and he must know 
how to make background checks of persons seeking 
employment with the University. 

He must be taught how to use and fire his gun, that 
an officer may use his gun only to save his life or that 
of another, beyond reasonable doubt in a Court of 
Law. 

He must study the Division Policy Manual and the 
University Traffic Regulations, and he must know 
these documents as he would the alphabet and the 
multiplication tables. He must be shown how the 
university is organized and the names and functions 
of its principal officals. It must be explained to him 
that his unit is but a part of a complex organization 
and that its primary purpose, aside from the 
numerous chores and services assigned to it, is the 
protection of property and people. 

Finally, the officer must be periodically examined to 
determine his proficiency and to aid in the decision 
whether he should be discharged or retained and 
given recognition in the form of a pay raise or 
promotion in rank 

— Robert A. Scruton 

Tulane University Self-Study, 
1967-1968 



PAGE 74 / 




/ PACE 73 




*" ""- "'i-,. 'ci.'^/,, %. % 'Jj; Si. .# :«^ ^ .a"- .<o -.o'^ 



'°«c, 



jaykaysergeofgekee-K/o,^^^ °<:n,p^^ 



'^iiyk 






••■"Pp* 



"'"'We 



o*"^' 






«ti^"' 



*v^^ 






^e^^^t..^ 



-'*^:^cxx:e^^o^^^^s^^...^ .„^<^=^^^^ 



baAarahickingbotlomandyWcldmanmarg,e,,„„^^ "'"ncferdhen ™*;;'--''Pla„ja„„;^PW 4=«'SBa«<n8««''-''"'"""""'"'^'='"J^"^l"'ea2leymeryibccker 



guerardpgi 
marciagumpe 



!!;:!!^^^'".'e;si-fi-"::r:S^-::e>- 



riosM' 



griccca,hygnrr,srredgrubisswaltB™ndyrongubac4"f„7,"';7'^A'rsc/,^,";i^^^^^^^^^ , ^Us.abemsuomannebeu' 

„i.Ubro«"''-bl,ckma„cvabl,ck™„,,,,„,bookoscli.abe'hboycrfeL«envana„nallern,,c 



iclalanbeychokcharlouerbeycr 



biW8« 



„„eUssabtammeT>a. 



■lollendebbiedmi 



I u,,r,nop^rpThver';bcnnvai;ame!anncaredojohnccarcymarchandersonjoanarboiiraniiearnoldbotsiaro(isi>iirayatiaiiasiobetsybatdridgeshei!abaloIstevebancrofI 
lencbuchallercourtneyburgesanaraouniigtsL'-iLrjvi j 





- 




{ 

• 


i^i^ 


\ 


^^ 




4 



'CACTUS: A Thorn m the Side of Indifference. 



Although many of us cringe today when we hear this rather 

dated slogan, it is still a valid description of what CACTUS 

does and what CACTUS hopes to do in the future. Over the 

past few years the thorns may have changed direction, and 

the sides may not be the same ones as before, but the 

premise behind CACTUS still exists unchanged: that a 

college education cannot and must not be limited to a 

classroom — an awareness of ones environment and 

participation in it is necessary for an education and the 

understanding and betterment of one's world. 

It is for this reason thatCACTUS exists: to provide students 

with opportunities to learn about their surroundings while 

applying their knowledge to help the community, be it city, 

campus, or both. 





'^t*'.-L:^i:>» 



^^:c5j^t^i^^^^^• 






Although CACTUS has had programs 
operating in the New Orleans community for 
many years, a campus direction is new for 
the organization. It was decided over a year 
ago that if a group is to be an effective lini< 
between the campus and the community then 
it must be a viable force on campus as well. 

For this reason, Campus Projects was 
established to investigate the opportunities 
for CACTUS involvement on campus, and to 
develop programs of on-campus activity. As 
an initial task. Campus Projects has 
undertaken a comprehensive study of student 
attitudes at Tulane. The results of this 
research will be available to anyone, and it 
will enable CACTUS to better evaluate the 
desires and needs of our students, leading to 
the development of campus programs. 

In addition. CACTUS, in co;>f5eration with 
the Sub-Committee on IVlmority Employmen 
is preparing a booklet fo(r distribution to all 
wage and staff employees at the University. 
This booklet will contain 
obtaining such commun 
aid. health care, and farr 



information on 

ty resources as legal 

ily assistance. 



In the community as we as on campus 



CACTUS is expanding to provide types of 
involvement different from those that have 
been offered in the past. This year CACTUS 
was allowed direct input into a citizen's 
planning group when it was given a seat on 
the Regional Planning Forum. This year a 
major part of the Forum's activities revolved 
around the controversial fvlississippi River 
bridge crossings. Hopefully, opportunities for 
direct student participation in decision- 
making bodies in the community will increase 
in the future. In another new type of 
involvement for the organization. CACTUS 
worked with Tulane law students in the 
setting up and operation of the Legal Referral 
Service of the Mardi Gras Coalition. 
providing legal assistance to hundreds of 
people during the holiday period. In addition. 
Volunteer Clearinghouse, a new CACTUS 
program, is providing students to fill 
specialized volunteer positions throughout 
the city. 

These are but a few of the many new 
directions that CACTUS has explored and 
must continue to explore in the future. The 
possibilities for different types of student 
involvement and input into the community 
and campus are great. 




Recently CACTUS has been emphasizing its new 

directions. These are, of course, important to the 

organization, equally important are the regular 

programs in which a majority of the CACTUS 

members participate. These projects have proven to 

be worthwhile for both the Tulane students as well as 

the recipients of the aid, and are continued because 

they can effectively fill needs. Project Opportunity, 

CACTUS' first program, graduated its first group of 

high school seniors last year. 32 of the 33 seniors 

currently attend college, and these seniors were able 

to generate $45,000 in first year financial aid. 

Project DARE, expanded this year to include two 

schools, McDonogh 15 in the French Quarter as well 

as Henderson Dunn in the Desire Area, is beneficial 

to and enjoyed by the children, and parents and 

school officials believe it is a great experience. 

CACTUS volunteers to Kingsley House have 

provided tutorial and recreational services needed 

by this settlement house in the Irish Channel. 

In CACTUS' earliest days, many people expected 

infant mortality to strike the organization at any time. 

However, during the early stages of the group, there 

were enough people dedicated to the CACTUS 



concept to see that this potential problem was 

overcome. Since then, involvement in CACTUS has 

grown at a rate to insure its continuance. But this has 

caused many problems to arise in the organization. 

Solutions to very mechanical problems, such as 

maintaining good volunteer records, are easy to 

implement; the most difficult problems arise in the 

fact that CACTUS programming involves 

interpersonal relationships, where motivational 

factors, expectations, dedication, and personality 

differences all come into play. Progress has been 

made in being able to employ these factors to the 

benefit of the organization, but often a conflict arises. 

This is the organization problem to which CACTUS 

must continue to direct itself, in order to be as 

effective as it possibly can. 

The time of hard decisions is not over for CACTUS. 

CACTUS must continue to be self-critical to work for 

better programs and be searching for new ideas 

which meet needs of the campus or community, and 

fit student interests. By its very nature, CACTUS must 

continually change in order to achieve its goals. In 

ten years CACTUS may still be using "The Thorn in 

the Side of Indifference" as its slogan, but the thorns 

and the sides will be different — if they weren't, 

CACTUS would not exist. 

— John Carey 

A&S'71 





PAGE 82 / 





NE score and two years ago, I played Doctor-Dan-the-Band- 
age-Man and decided, in a moment of ridiculous grandiosity, 
that I wanted to be a physician. 



Two years later, I underwent some interviews that were 

pregnant with foreshadowing. A favorite question at these 

"talks" was always why I wanted to be a doctor. At the time, 

the answer that that's what my daddy did seemed quite adequate. Another 

point which appeared to impress my judges was that I had instigated 

original research into Little Golden Books, built my own log cabins, and 

even experimented with handwriting. 

Needless to say, (pardon the pretention) I was easily accepted that year to 
the P.S. 38 Queens Kindergarten (it may be that the letter of Rec. from the 
Chief of Nursery School helped a little), and began the arduous graded 
educational journey culminating with, as I Freudianly slipped often in later 
years, med stool. 

I turned to find my hand below my waist and the surgical scrub nurse yelling 
at me to quickly divest, depressurize, and desist the "Field," or something. I 
informed her that I was an expert puzzle-fixer. She asked (exclaimed!) 
"Where'd YOU go t' skewl, bo-eh? ' I answered proudly, "P.S. 38." Later, 
the surgeon supported my ego by reassuring me that he felt I had the hands 
of a psychiatrist. 

I began to perceive that time had not been at all quantized, for the years of 
primary, secondary, tertiary, and the first three years of quaternary amentia 
had obiously congealed and clotted in my mind. Only scattered were debris 
of a spelling bee, swim meet, high school play, physics instructor vague 
football games, a dismembered corpse in the lab, == ■==>-■ -h for the obev 
snoring in boredom of the dog, grey-yellow nights > and neck-a 

midnight mornings with needles, noise and nu 
in a fetid fecal-odored ward, writing and achii.. 
enduring professors who didn't believe in psychiatry or abortions. 
Newcomb girls who didn't believe in God or fellatio. 

Of a sudden, it is all interesting cocktail clack t, whatever your 

favorite metaphor, is gone, the long proverbia eryone always talked 

about lies more in the crevasse that follows e. ^tep. The future may 

not be quantized, eith ' "cially the next fou; .l' icn years, which I will 
spend in further train n the everpresent. non-belabored hope that I 

am not squandering the best years of my life in preparation for the worst. 



/ PAGE 83 



HISTORY NIGHTMARE 



¥: 




\ 



Doctor: Hello there. What's the trouble? 
Patient: That's for you to find out, ain't it, Doc 
Doc: Yes. Uh-huh. What I mean is, how you feelin'? 



Doc: Where? 

Pt: All over. 

Doc: Any specific pain? 

Hi; uri no. I jusi nun irom my head to my toes. 



PAGE 84 / 



Doc: Can you describe the pain? 

Doc: How long have you been feeling this way? 

Doc: What I mean is, how long have you had this pain? 

Pt: Oh, I'd say since about the time when I got sick. 

Doc: And when was that? 

Pi. Auoui the same tune as rny sistei J. 

Doc: Well, how old is the child now? 

Pt: Poorthinci died in childbir 

Doc: OK. Let's try another approach — Are there any members of your 

family who are or have been sick with this type of thing? 
: .. _ - Liy Miuvv. naveii l i^en none ui uiein since i 

Doc: Have you ever been in this hospital before? 

3 about four years old. 
Doc: Why was that? 

arxc^o, yuu cApect me to reriici, c. 

Doc: Excuse me a moment. 
Pt: What's the trouble? 
Doc: I have a headache. 

.. .-^..^ ..^.^ y^-^ oeen feelin' this way? 



'Written in Sophomore year, while on the wards 
awaiting instructor the first day of Physical 
Diagnosis. We were to begin that day to apply the 
history-taking method we had been taught to real 
people. 



ft 







Q 



/ PACE 8.5 



ll 



LOVE 

The chimera fibrillates 

On a filionyx agar 

And flaunts its papillary nebulae 

At the mediastinal flaw. 

The arytenoid emanates 
A deep pleural spasm: 
A cataplectic murmur 
From philiogenic entombment. 

As anarthria bows 
To pterygoid transmutation 
Of the ablated embolus, 
The sceptre speaks. 

10/30/67 




GOODBYE, ZEAL. 

When digitalis left me cold, 
I tried an hour of Donne; 
And realized, thus, anon, behold: 
That school just is not fun. 

As basic sciences are pedantic 
and bore for factuality, 
So the humanities crawl in semantic 
Paradox and generality. 

I thought — To transcend Medicine! 
— The world of live or die . . . 
In novel class, I found but Sin, 
Reality, and Why. 

Oh sad, that after years to train 
Through studies long and grueling, 
To come to terms with one's own brain 
That's learned to loathe all schooling. 

4/4/69 



REFLECTIONS ON A 1-DAY VACATION. 

Fastly free 
fixed at anonymity 
in the tornado of time 

Ecstatically alea 
with unit homonymity 
and indulgence of prime 

Diseased of delight 
fever of nothingness 
convulsant with relief 

Triumphantly trite 

afloat in the meaningless 
devoid of belief 

One pillow-case-calm night; 
then back to parading 
the plague of ambition 

In the prescribed rite 
of Thirst mascarading 
with false deglutition. 

1/70 



PAGE 86 / 



SUTURING LEON 

Drugged and lacerated 
Bundled like a bunny 

in a straight-jacket of stupor 

and silent pain 
he sleeps. 

O Mother, 
thou wouldst leave little bunting for 
an obscene phone call 
Leave him to the merciless guilt-laden hands 
of the amateur seamster 

equipped with hypo and masked with gown. 

In a tile torture cubicle 
seeming punishment 

for defending Quijote 
this chamber of screams 
incongruity intrinsic 
poverty prolific 
ignorance staple 

the eye meticulously mended 
the Selvage rebeckons 

needle-tracks 

drunken-auto gash 

stab to the stomach 

hatchet to the head 

bullet to the groin 
O, Mother 

for which atrocity 

in his personal melodramic 
will he next call. 





Emergency Room, 
Charity, 5/19/70 



/ PAGE 87 





^<ing back 





It is a year to know loneliness: to feel it envelope 
you in the chill romance of more light rains than you 
thought possible, or to recognize it through the 
incomparable joy of meeting up with a friend and 
the two of you setting off to visit cities you may still 
feel you had no right to see: for the cities were 
there long before you and will not change with your 
coming, and there is something profane in your 
American newness and glitter which you wish you 
could shake, leave hidden in an Austrian snow or 
up in the room in your pension. 
But then again, the cities are too grand to be 
harried by your small vulgarity. 
-And, strangely enough, it is a year to feel the 
surprise in yourself when you look at the stone 
turned into a man by a mere man, and a cathedral. 



god, the cathedrals, and a painting, and you fight 

the tears and the awe in admitting that there had to 

be something somewhere, some glorious 

meaning— maybe in the artists themselves, or maybe 

they knew what it was. and maybe you're closer to it 

now for being closer to them. You do know, and 

you feel yourself becoming so very much greater 

and smaller as you realize, and your interests 

increase five fold and your emotions ten. 

And then, if you're lucky and if you're willing, and 

we all were, you have become a part of it all and 

you can see the difference between you and the 

visitors, and you're proud and humble, and 

independent, and so much older, and some of It 

even remains through the beating you take in 

coming home. 

—Rick Drake, A & S '71 

University of Hamburg 
1969-1970 



I 




poem written in paris caf^ 

sitting in a cafe 
rue Dante 
parispicturesque 
the thing 

to do 

you know 
writing a poem 
bitchy mood 

couldbeanywhere 
sitting alone in pariscafelife 
writing a poem 
the thing 

you know 

to do 

doing nothing 

only wasting paperthoughts 
sitting alone in pariscafelife 
writing a poem about: 

writing a poem 
you know 
the thing 
to do 



cafe select, blvd. montparnasse 

sipping days 

hours 
blinks 

afternoon poured by sighing 

into mist of hot wine thoughts 

eyeing through cafe-window passing 

in and out of cafe-world 

to streetworld 

some never voyaged near our land 

we scanned the universe 

of us 

touching very little 

maybe even then too much 

of what never has an answer 

we did not save the world 

nor try to save ourselves 

the trouble 

of asking the question 

only our empty wineglasses know 



PAGE 90 / 



champselyseeseyes 



champselyseeseyeslife peopling through eyemind 
parisdrunk on peoplesights impressions 
heavy air-incensed jasminemist 
greenjade-screened city 
mystery-clung spectred lovestoned city 
walking down champselysees 

fractionglimpsed eyes of one whom i loved splitsecondly 
rushdistance crowdfaced hypnotized 

unspeakable 

ohiloveyou champselyseeseyes 

forever 
I'll search everywhere for your holygraillove 
craning through street-throngs metrobodies 

until i find you 
or 

something approximate 



la pubeile 

below 

boul' miche street 

so winterbarren yesterday 

is today 

springreened of monet tints 

leafbrushed thickly 

on canvasbarked branches 

splotched yellow sometimes 

blossoms 

dogs shit on sidewalks 

for unwary pedestrians 

bereted frenchmen pee in pissoirs 

one can whiff it in the parisair 

perfumed with channel or st. laurent 

and from my windowseat 

i see irontip of eiffel tower 

peek above parisgray rooftops 

as i spysecretly on sunset pinktinge 

a whitebent man with 

red-and-green-plaid sack 

crookedly rumages in garbage can 

across the street 

for something 

he doesn't find 

so leaves 

without 

putting back the lid 

-Nancy Harris. Newcomb 71 
Sorbonne, 1969-1970 




/ PAGE 91 



I spent my first two years at Newcomb learning to be a clocl<- 

watcher. Having to cram five courses into 960 minutes of my 

working day, my life ran on a schedule so that not one 

productive moment would be lost. With such efficiency. I 

became what was demanded of me, an academic machine of 

mass production. Not until my Junior year abroad in England 

did I bury my clocks and discover people. 

"Man should not live by the clock alone." This is perhaps 

the most valuable lesson I learned from the English. Time 

became dependant not on the passing of minutes, but on the 

experiences that occurred within those minutes, 

experiences that transcended the purely academic sphere 

and involved "living in the moment with people." 

Such experiences were possible in an educational 

environment that placed more emphasis on independant 

studies than required assignments, more emphasis on 

creative thinking than memory skills; a system where 

pressure is an American word. I do not mean to idealize the 

English system, for in several areas it is weak. But I do think 

the confidence given to the student to create his own 

learning schedule promotes a much healthier attitude 

towards time. 

The British students seemed to place as much importance 

on hours spent in discussion during coffee breaks as on 

hours spent in the isolation of books and the library. As a 

consequence, the learning experience became not a mere 

compartment of one's life, buta total activity. Returning to 

New Orleans. I can feel myself being caught up again in the 

clockwork machinery. One hopeful note is that the clocks in 

the library are never on time. 

— Nora Riley, Newcomb '71 

University of East Anglia. 

1969-1970 




HI- 




PAGE 92 / 




Each returning Junior Year Abroad student returns to 
Tulane his senior year with his own set of memorabilia. 
Each underwent a separate and unique experience, 
and I can only talk about how living abroad affected me 
personally. 

First of all. you notice the differences in the 
educational system. The British system encourages 
much more initiative on the part of the student. He is 
not constantly deluged with bi-weekly quizzes or mid- 
terms in each subject. Indeed, many students in the 
liberal arts, like myself, had only one battery of 
examinations (in May and June), covering the course 
work for the entire year. The students thus have much 
more opportunity to ration their own time, and can, for 
instance, spend a few weeks going into depth in just 
one of his courses he is interested in following up. 

All final examinations are essay, giving the student a 
wide range of questions from which to pick. It is 
assumed that he will have a basic understanding of his 
course; so rather than examining a superficial 
knowledge of the entire course, finals test students in 
several particular aspects of the course which the 
student himself picks to study. 

Instead of quizzes, term papers are stressed and 
tutorials are offered with specialists in your field. 
Extensive outside reading is required, but you don't 
notice how much you are reading because you are 
picking out the books you want to read, rather than 
having a single textbook you have to memorize the 
night before a test. 

You are not as dependent on the professor for learning 
his interpretation of a work of literature or of a period of 
history. Instead, you are forced into making your own 
interpretations and defending them In your papers and 
in your discussions with your tutor. Thus, individual 
research is stressed, and not simply copying down a 
lecturer's notes and memorizing his own point of view 
and his own bias. 

You emerge from your year of study with a feeling that 
perhaps you have not learned more individual facts or 
picky details that you can recall at a moment's notice. 



but that you have certainly made your own opinion, 
formed your own interpretation. This gives you a much 
greater pride of accomplishment and scholarly feeling 
than you usually get in an undergraduate American 
institution. 

What, though, is it like to live in Europe for a year? First 
of all, you realize that you cannot possibly hope to 
comprehend a foreign culture, to immerse yourself in it 
completely and to understand it fully without living 
there for an extended period of time. You can truly 
understand neither Shakespeare nor the British general 
election without having experienced England. Indeed a 
year seems really so short! But how much better it is 
than simply going over in the summer, travelling around 
with other Americans, rapping with them, visiting the 
typical American college summer tour haunts: 14 
countries in 21 days! You can understand English 
history and politics. English literature — indeed, the 
English themselves — only by being constantly 
bombarded by the same impressions and feeling the 
same pressures they do, on a day-to-day basis, 
certainly not by staying at the London Hilton for a week. 

The University hall is a great place to meet people. You 
actually get to know all the people in the hall. Mine was 
a typical example. I was the hall Yank. The rest of the 
residents were English, about 160 of them, together 
with about 20 Scots, two Nigerians, a Syrian, two 
Melanese, a Welshman and a Russian. The hall is much 
more of an integral unit in England than the dormitory 
is here in the U.S. We ate out meals together, we 
studied and played together. There was no cer 
campus at my university (typically so in Englar 
was a 20 minute walk to the classroom buildmgs and 
the halls themselves were separated from each other. 
You gradually become Anglicized after about live or six 
months there. On weekends we would roam the 
Yorkshire moors. 

I miss it all. 



Jim Dalfares, A. & S. 71 

University of Sheffield. 

1969-1970 



/ p.vcE 93 



r ^ 




fs. 



Law students are often accused of living in oblivion 
to the community and the campus. Yet, two of the last 
three presidents of the Tulane Student Senate were 
law students. This year's head of the University 
Center Board is a law student. And the Direction 
program was conceived, organized, and still is 
staffed in important roles by law students. 

More dramatic, however, are law students' activities 
off campus. For example, this year they created a 
Consumer Protection Clinic, under the auspices of 
the Law School, to help wage the consumers' war for 
better products and less abuses. At present, the 
Clinic involves only law students, but soon it will 
include students from other schools in the University. 
Already, it has valuably aided many harried 
consumers and, in the process, afforded students 
practical experience in a widening area of law. 

The most important work by law students this year 
came via the internship some clinic members served 
with the New Orleans Legal Assistance Corporation. 
Through this organization, students worked in 
neighborhood offices, advising consumers of their 
rights and remedies for certain problems. In another 
area, other students formed a research team to study 
and evaluate data on specific consumer problems. 
This team focuses upon a particular area each year, 
and in its first year has analyzed credit practices and 
debt collection measures in New Orleans. 




PAGE 94 / 




In the future, Clinic members will move into 
consumer education, hoping to make people more 
aware of comparison shopping, and of typical fraud 
practices, and of what they can do to fight them. 
Finally, the Clinic will examine existing legislation to 
help draft new laws. This work comes from careful 
economic and legal research, and may prove a 
useful tool in guiding local legislative action. 




/ PACE 95 



r ^ 



r^l 



s?: 




While consumer problems occupy some students, 
others work in programs aimed at securing the due 
process rights of the poor. The Release On 
Recognizance program has helped many people 
charged with crimes to secure bail for which they are 
eligible, but too poor to afford. The Constitution 
assures a quick trial and a fair judicial process; both 
assurances however, are abrased when they must sit 
in jail for weeks and even months awaiting trial, 
merely because they could not afford bail. 

Under tightly supervised government procedures, 
students help to secure the release, on their 
recognizance, of some of these indigents. To qualify, 
the indigent must show ties to the community strong 
enough to insure a high chance that he will turn up at 
his trial. To date, the program has proved a large 
success. 



^ 

1 



I i 



In another dramatic development this spring, the 
Louisiana Supreme Court ruled to permit students an 
opportunity by which they can tell prospective 
employers they've had actual courtroom experience. 
Under the supervision of practicing attorneys, 
seniors can now work in civil cases that do not 
involve a fee, and in some criminal cases. In the 
criminal area, they can work for either the defense or 
the prosecution. This program is a unique 
educational venture that should also aid defendants 
whose cases require close attention, but who cannot 
afford a good lawyer. It will be run under the 



PAGE 96 / 



J Y L/L- , I g/// 7 0/''-''' ^' • 




4 

5. 



You have the right to use the telephone . 

You need not make any statement i thot is. you have a 
right to remain silent ■• 

Anything you say may be used against you in +ria\ . 

You have a right to consult UJrth ond obtain the advice of an 
attorney , before ansiuering any questions . 

\f you cannot afford an alforncy . the court \3S\\\ obtdvn 
on attorr\ey io represent you and advise you . 

You have a right to have your ottomey or an appointed aHorney 
present at the time of any questioning or giving of ony statements . 

If you are charged Luith a -felony, you have a right to reauest 
pref/minary examinotion by a magistrate ■• 



DEPARTMENT OF POLICE 
CITY OP NEW ORLEANS 



JOSEPH \. G\^^RUs.so 

SUPEMNTENDENT 



auspices of the law school and the Moot Court, and 
honors organization that provides training and 
experience in trial w/ork. 

These activities represent a shift from what law 
students have long been taught to do. Obligations to 
scholarship are not. however, less today. But when 
the Law School moved this fall into its new quarters 
in the former library building, it moved also into a 
new era. The curriculum is much expanded, and new 
programs such as these now exist to carry students 
to new steps beyond the confines of the classroom, 
affording them practical education and the 
community needed and constructive services. 

—James Farwell 

Law 71 




/ PAGE 9'J 



ARCHI 




r 



PAGE 98 / 



FECTURE 



evolution 

beyond all precedent 



|"We stand with one foot in the Renaissance and the other in a world which 
announces itself through the most profound social and technological 
revolution in man's history. It is an evolutionary revolution, but unlike any 
before, the pace of the evolution is accelerated beyond all prior 
precedent. " 

It was as an effort to respond to the changes referred to in the above by the 
late John W. Lawrence. Dean of the School of Architecture, that a reevalua- 
tion and modification of the structure of the School has occurred. Buildings 
do not exist independent of their surroundings: they must be woven into the 
intricate fabric created by an ever increasingly complex culture. 

In recent years, questions have been raised concerning the environment 
which is being created, and the needs of the people who live in it. During 
the past two years, through the efforts of both students and faculty, the 
School of Architecture embarked on its reevaluation. 

A curriculum committee consisting of students and faculty was established, 
and questionaires were distributed to help determine what courses shoud 
be added, changed or dropped to make the curriculum more relevant to the 
students' needs. Under the resulting changes, certain humanity and science 
requirements were reduced. Increased emphasis has been placed on 
conceptual sketches and drawings in the early years of study and the 
understanding of present problems, as well as some glimpse of possible 
future problems through reading and lectures. 

Technical knowledge such as structural and mechanical systems is also 
being made available at an earlier point in the curriculum, serving 
multipurpose objectives. Not only does it give the student tangible 
knowledge and materials with which to work, but it also allows more time in 

later years for investigation into other fields. 

A seminar system through which students study fields such as real estate, 

financing, urban sociology, and the use of computers in program analysis 

has been established and is on an elective basis. The seminar system also 

allows for the exchange of ideas between students and professors on a 

more informal basis. 



/ PAGE 99 



A platform system, allowing students who have completed their sophomore 
year to choose their design instructor and projects, is being tested. 

Combined, these changes present more relevant information to the student 
faster and allows more freedom in developing particular interests. 

Each problem issued in design class has a myriad of solutions, each having 

its own merits and weaknesses. By analysis of varying solutions and the 

testing and exchanging of ideas between students and professors of 

different backgrounds and experiences, students are taught to think in 

conceptual form and to make decisions without attempting to reach 

predetermined answers, hopefully developing within the student a mental 

process applicable to future problems regardless of their nature. 

The School periodically tests theories developed in the academic 

atmosphere against existing problems, such as QUARTERFRONT, a study 

of the Vieux Carre Riverfront, and takes part in community activities such as 

Metro-Link, a local Community Design Center. Under the River Front Project 

alternate designs for an expressway along the riverside of the Vieux Carre 

and the impact of each on the Quarter were studied. Through Metro-Link, 

partically staffed with Tulane Architecture students, persons who would not 

normally have access to an architects services may obtain it, and students 

hopefully acquire a better idea of problems facing the architect in the future. 

Changes in the School of Architecture came about due to the inherent 
nature of the subject, the size of the student body, the near total autonomy 




the School has within the University system, and an overall willingness, if 
not desire, on the part of the students and faculty to find and explore new 
ideas and methods for solving the problems facing the architect. The 
increased time students spend with each other and with professors is of 
major importance in that it allows for a more intense and extensive 
exchange of ideas than is found in the normal three day-a-week 
lecture. The future of the Tulane School of Architecture, as well as any 
educational institution, lies in the continuing exchange of ideas between 
students and professors, and the School's ability as a formal structure to 
remain philosophically open, allowing students and professors to project 
into the future and react in a responsible manner to the demands placed on 
them by their society. 

The School of Architecture has made a conscientious effort to update the 

structure of its curriculum relative to the current changes and needs of our 

society. If the end product of a college education is to be an informed, 

thinking individual, all schools within this University would do well to 

undergo a similar periodic reevaluation. 



PAGE 100 / 



- KnoxTumlin 






/ PAGE 101 




I 



PAGE 102 / 



SMALL group of Tulane graduate students, 

) in an effort to provide educational 
alternatives in New Orleans, organized the New Orleans Free University. 
The concept of providing information so that people couJd find new and 
more suitable educational experiences was best put forth in the first 
catalog: 



"As schools and universities respond inflexibly and unimaginatively to 
changing human needs, their unquestioned right to monopolize 
education becomes increasingly untenable. Communication between 
the growing numbers of those dissatisfied or alienated serves as 
catalyst to unite isolated efforts and thereby create a new form and style 
of education. The free school movement is an outgrowth of a new 
culture seeking to release the individual's perception from unnecessary 
constraints." 



The Free University in the New Orleans area is a means of providing 
information which will enable people of diverse interests and 
backgrounds to interact creatively. Since course moderators are not 
paid, the F.U. attracts people committed to the intrinsic rewards of the 
learning process rather than to financial gain or status. All courses are 
free and non-credit and anyone may participate as instructor and/or 
student. Involvement in the F.U., whether teaching or learning, can 
begin to penetrate communication barriers and to reorient attitudes 
toward education. 



The result of this effort so far has been the offering of courses ranging 
from film making to anarchism to transcendental meditation, and the 
involvement and interaction of students from all campuses in New 
Orleans, heads from the Quarter, and others. More than 50 people 
(though no Tulane faculty members) have taken the time to conduct 
courses. Free University is thus one of the all too scarce ways that 
Tulane extends itself as a true university should, even to those 
dissatisfied with it. 

— Ben Weathersby 



/ PAGE 103 



/VOC 



4 — 



mk' 



\ 



ei> 









'«^. 



C«:i 



o 



L_ 



((ii\4;' 



^>s^ 



^'^r 



0*^ 



-^ 



*«' • 



^; 



X 



-p 

V 



■j 






^. 



T% 



H 



aSi 



^i^U^^tf 



hM 



id a 



!:;V 



>:^ 



4'u, 



1- ,1 



VUV, 



\. 



\(M 






i>. 



O 



-Of 



e7< 



'oo, 



^ 



/ 






//, 



rci. 



-y/ 



ktl- 





I 



_ 






P 



l^^>y^^NJ>^a\X■Tw^;>y^J;^J;^^J^ 



-/ 







HOW LONG 



Fraternities have found, as have American troop 

commanders in Viet Nam, college administrators, 

and frustrated parents, that young people are a lot 

less willing to take orders without question than in 

the past. More aware, more articulate, more 

demanding than before, today's kids hesitate to 

accept established mores and authority at face 

value. They ask "why" and expect to be answered. 

Inside they are growing and gaining an 

appreciation of their own complexities. They are 

reluctant to sacrifice their beings to the goals of a 

technological society, which are unexplained, not 

understood, often "plastic," and sometimes 

worthless. "Do your own thing" is the publically 

proclaimed method for developing the total 

personality and achieving a realization of self. Those 

who prohibit the implementation of this principle risk 

rejection by the youth culture. 

The modern mood is anti-organizational because 

kids want individual freedom to create their own 

styles. But they are unsure of which direction to take. 

A few years ago, when conformity was not only 

acceptable, but necessary for social survival, 

security was available at a very small intellectual 

cost. In addition to a specified wardrobe, guaranteed 

to impress everyone on campus, fraternity men were 

provided with enough prestige and good times to 

make four years at college relatively painless. 

This is no longer adequate for today's more 

serious and thought-probing students. They have 

found the traditional kibitzing and hell-raising a poor 

substitute for the meaning they are seeking. 

Sensitive to criticisms that they are "irrelevant," 

fraternities are finding it necessary to adapt 

themselves to the changing tones. Aware of the 

antagonism towards stereotypes, the organizations 

are playing up individualism to attract new members 

and have become more tolerant of differences. They 

are trying to convince people that group 

participation does not necessarily mean a loss of 

identity. 



The stringent enforcement of norms and mores in 

the House has dissipated because the whole thing is 

more "open" now. The House is requiring less of a 

total personality involvement, instead of the with-us- 

or-against-us attitude. The hard knocks caused by 

deactivation and loss of pledges last year made 

some fraternities realize the need for change. 

Clearly the biggest problem facing the frats is the 

change in attitude of freshmen. Aside from being 

more inclined towards academics than in the past, 

freshmen are much more independent than before. 

They want to find out who they are without somebody 

telling, and they seem not to need the fraternity as an 

organization. 

The mass media have had much to do with the 

awareness of young people, causing them to "grow 

up faster." Viewing the campus as an outlet for 

political expression, some incoming freshmen are 

questioning the purpose of an organization like the 

fraternity. People are scrutinizing the 

fraternities — questioning the system, and needing to 

be convinced. There are fewer people being 

shepherded in. However, more of those who came 

through rush were commitied to joining and not just 

enjoying the parties. They were looking harder. 



Some freshmen who have joined fraternities have 

made themselves heard. The freshmen of one 

fraternity last year were responsible for a change in 

the master-pledge relationship. By this year, all the 

fraternities have revamped their pledge programs to 

accommodate the changing youth. As one fraternity's 

rush chairman put it, "The pledges are a little 

smarter now. They know more about the world than 

they used to, and we can't tell them what to do. 

That's why we have to be more reasonable with 

them." 

Apparently, the days when the pledges had to fetch 



PAGE 106 / 




WILL THEY BE ABLE TO STAY? 





matches, wash cars, do push-ups. and bounce balls 
on the end of their noses, are coming to a close. The 
trend is definitely away from the old hazing and 
personal servitude practices. The reason is 
simple — freshmen refuse to take it anymore. 

Now, in many cases, the pledge period is limited to 
approximately six weeks, after which time the 
individual becomes an associate member. During 
this stage, unlike before, he is permitted to attend 
the meetings and have a voice. Some organizations 
permit their pledges to vote. 

There was no big snow-job attempt on the part of 

fraternities this year during rush. A more informal. 
person-to-person, less expensive rush took place. 
instead of the orientation marathons of the past. The 
"hard sell" was abandoned in favor of something 
more casual and leisurely. Fraternities didn't go to 
the dorms to drag rushees out. 

Previously, the pledge training was used to fulfill 
the somewhat sadistic needs of the active members. 
It is now aimed at the needs of the pledge, with the 
emphasis on the success experience, rather than 
failure. Where before antagonism was employed to 
unify the pledges as a class, new members are now 
integrated into the chapter as indiiduals. 

The biggest change has been from the concept of 
"pledges until they prove themselves" to the concept 
of an individual within the fraternity to be educated 
in the workings of the structure. Indeed, several of 
the groups seem to be following this method. 

In spite of these efforts, rush this year has not 
been as successful as in the past. The number of 
pledges this year reaches at least 300. whereas last 
year's total was over 100 people higher. These 






/ PAGE 107 











figures are somewhat misleading in that the present 
policy of open rush permits fraternities to take new 
members all year. What's more, though there have 
been various rumors circulating that said fraternities 
are on the decline, several organizations reported 
that they have more pledges in their organizations 
than before. 

Some individuals pointed to the anti-fraternity 
literature that bombards freshmen as soon as they 
arrive on campus. The Hullabaloo, with its traditional 
editorial stand against the Greek system, was not 
popular among them. Another indicated that the 
inflationary tendencies in the National economy have 
affected the financial ability of people to join. The 
fraternity is a business organization too, and must 
have capital in order to run. At the same time, some 
point out, there was a definite reluctance on the part 
of actives last year to cough up the fees. The actives 
didn't feel they were getting enough out of it. 

There is some concern that, with fraternities losing 
their grip on the campus, they may disappear 
completely within a matter of years. Most fraternity 
members believe that fraternities will last quite a 
while longer, though perhaps, not in their present 
form. In fact, most of the organizations seem to be 
getting away from the formality and ritual. There is 
less emphasis on fraternity structure; some don't 
bother with meetings. 



One fraternity representative had some interesting 
comments to make about fraternities, aside from the 
point that he is against them. Students have gone 
through the social aspect in high school, and are 
now looking for something more, he explained. "You 
have to broaden the scope to keep them interested. 
The University should come first, and the fraternity, 
second. If the fraternity is going to be useful, it has to 
give something to the University, it has to start 
getting involved. The fraternity has been happy to be 
isolated, but it was always taking away." 



PAGE 108 / 



It seems that now, a few fraternities are interested 

in taking the ideas of their individuals and turning 

them outside to deal with the more meaningful 

problems of today. Furthermore, these fraternities 

feel that they could fulfill some important roles that 

the University should be, but isn't, taking on, like 

academic counseling, particularly in regard to class 

selection. 

Not all fraternity men feel that their organizations 

should have a deeper role in the University and 

society as a whole. Many believe that the fraternity's 

sole purpose is that of a social unit. Furthermore, the 

frats don't seem to be as progressive as all their 

stress on individualism and social awareness would 

indicate. There is some evidence of the traditional 

pranks like overturning Volkswagens, and customs 

like answering the phone Army-style, "This is pledge 

so-and-so. . ." 

But the image of fraternities has been somewhat 

updated as they all have their share of long-haired 

people who wear bell-bottoms and peace symbols. 

"In frats," as one such person says, "if you used to 

use drugs, you were a freak; now, if you don't, you're 

a freak." 

Fraternities can hardly be considered revolutionary 

with their acceptance of hairy people and trippers. 

since these are symbols of the modern age. In fact. 

it is clear that fraternities are struggling to keep up 

with the contemporary trends, rather than initiating 

any. It is difficult to measure how far fraternities have 

come from the old stereotype. What is most evident 

perhaps, is that there exists an understanding that to 

survive, they are going to have to adapt. Clearly, 

there are traces of the old image around. 

The interesting question is. "How long will they be able 

to stay?" 



— Cindy Stevens 

Newcomb 71 




/ PAGE 109 




Has the white-gloved image of 
sorority rush gotten slightly dirty? 
Has all the hand clapping become off- 
beat and the songs a little out of 
tune? Some people seem to think so. 
When rushees and actives wonder if 
it's real and pray for the day the 
whole affair will be over, it's time for a 
change. Their radical heritage is 
creeping out of the mothballs and, 
thank God, things are really 
changing. From faces and family to 
personality and intellect; from 
homogeneous milkshake 
organizations towards a diversified 
hodgepodge, the bonds of the 
goldfish swallowing days 
are fading into oblivion 
and the reincarnation of 
individualism is here. 

Individualism that requires a rush 

geared to the selection of members 

for what they are, not who they know. 

A rush that says "this is what we've 

got and are offering you" instead of 

one that announces that "this is what 

we are and you will become." The 

focus of rush has shifted from clothes 

to the person, from "she's just so 

sweet" to intelligence, talent, abilities 

and interests. 

Times have changed and people 

are concerned with finding out who 

they really are. The existence of 

sororities hinges on their part in 

helping to answer this question. It is 

to this role that the "new rush" is and 

has to be oriented. The modern 

version of rush must stress the 

freedom for growth in a sorority — that 

everyone doesn't hold their cigarette 

the same way or cross their legs in 

the identical fashion; that sororities 

want and need people who are 

different, who do question and 

sincerely want to find answers. 

Without this vitality, without these 

people who question, how can 

sororities ever find out what is real? 

Something new had to be created, 
something that would put across this 




^w"-«' J^IJJJI. 


t Ml good '^*' "- KKr ,. 


i 


J^mmm?- 


h UV.''A 


L Algoodg-* 




^^H 


wm 


1? 


"•»^ 







"i 



necessity for vitality. And so a 
new method of rusii was born — one winere tine 
emphasis is based on the individual, centered on 
finding out what makes a rushee tick, what does she 
have to offer the sorority and what can the sorority 
offer her. With birth came death — death to a great 
deal of trivia, a great deal of the superficial, the 
insignificant. Instead of the songs, skits and 
conversation have become centered around what the 
sorority has to offer, what it is and can be, why it is 
real. 




And so a metamorphosis has occurred. The 
cocoon that has encircled sororities and rush for so 
many years is beginning to crumble. What will 
emerge, only time will tell. Its form is beginning to 
appear, its wings are starting to break free from the 
bonds of the old lifeless cocoon. The change has 
occurred, but whether a butterfly or a moth emerges 
remains to be seen. 

— Karen Lautz 

Newcomb 73 




PAGE 112 / 



..■SSrtri 






LJ^^r; 







'I'i^ 



i f^-. 




\ 



BY HAROLD SYLVESTER 



It took a long time for Black people to realize 

that to actualize themselves was not to 

acculturate to White society. 400 long hard 

years have passed and finally we Black 

people can see ourselves through the 

camouflage of American Society. 

We are different. Our Black skins and 

empty pockets set us apart from other 

Americans. Black people are not a part of the 

same apocalyptic intrigue that propels the 

world from one war to the next, from suicidal 

death to suicidal death. We have our own 

cause. 



■ <r*<r 



/ PACE 115 






Black people at Tulane, as Is evident by 

the chosen seclusion of the Afro-American 

Congress, struggle as do brothers and sisters 

all over the world to build our own empires. 

Resegregation? A sick word but call it what 

you will. Realize though that it is necessary in 

order for us to establish an identity strong 

enough to break the symbiosis that we have 

had with white society for much too long. We 

have been playing pseudo-masochistic 

games with each other for too long. What we 

want to do is stop the game, but if we can't, 

then we'll just have to reverse the order. 

Being separate from the rest of society is 

nothing new for Black folks. We have been 

that way all along. The difference now is that 

we have chosen this way ourselves. We have 



PAGE 116 / 





<^v,< 



a new awareness of the fact tfiat the rest of 
society is just not that pretty. We have had a ' 
good thing going for us for a long time. Blacl< 
society is poetic. It is beautiful and dramatic. 
What we learn in a society is both good and 
bad. We sift through the mess and try to 
grasp what is good. 

Black people know two worlds and their 
preference is obvious. Also it is obvious that 
we are living in a real world where all of the 
different groups have to compromise or 
destroy each other. We are not bent on ■' 

destruction so we must compromise. Our 
compromise will no longer cause us an 
expense, for we have an Identity. 

We know who we are. 




/ PAGE 117 





W^J^^ 







S chita^rS,'^,;;^;^;-/.^-, , ,ost ny West 
looked like What a 0X0! ^ '"^° ^^^ ^^'"s. Tulane 
compared to the La Sn^ T^ supposed to, "^ 

oame. My educatforwas k' n'' '''°'^ ^^«^<^- ' 
exotement. The F?ee Soepnh '^ "'^' ^"^ ' ^^^^ '-^ 
been heard at Tulane bufT r°'^^^"t had not yet 
orth With beer and good rock an^^'/^ "'^^ ^'^^^^ 
tactics class at the arTdo^ "^ '°"- ' 'eft the 
we were in Vietnam 'St ^.f"' 1°:^°^ ^^^^^ ^hy 
classmates, along wihou^lr"'^'^^ *° '^^ 
surpass the '67 cls ' Smce thatT"°T:"^°'^^ ^^^H 
to a greater understanri^ . i^^ *"^e I have come 
^otto. My Class was the one°L'°J' ''' ^^^ ^"^ th? 
casualties in the war Bun wl f * ^'^ '" *^^^s of 
eden, clothed with a lis ' '^^^ '" -^^ S^rden of 

The first time I r-arr,^ ■ ^ 

administra^on Sr tn'" ?.°"*^^* ^1*^ the 

-as over th'i'is'e'oVa fratern^''^ *'<=^^* ^-^au. 

resulted in the imposition nf^ ^^'^^ ^^ich 

probation for my chamer ^ h^ °."^ ^^^^ ^°cial 

"ext year by a total sSpens ion' T" '°"°^^d *he 

repeat of the "DebuSp ^"f ^""''"'"''^^ for a 

fhe underground, andT^as fun ""' '"'' ''''' °f 

SL^;rsrp:rdTs£ T 

paranoia began to build With tL'^l^"^' ^^^ the 
hassle students off campu^ anHlH^"'* beginning to 
use of mind effecting intoxicant. ^ ^'"^^^ °f ^he 
ghetto began to gesta e Fnn °" campus, the 
censorship of the aHeTed 'ih?'"^ *'^" ^P'^°^e of 
P^o-graphs, the ann^afsp^^nr^:- ^^^^^^^^^^^ 



PAGE II 18 / 



•Ui 




/ PAGE 119 



•,"«! I- 



m^ 






«^**1 



V'^i 



:*^ 






W 



^■■■^ *he ACT Vibrations 

faculty committee. The on y p An^erican univers ty 

■ ,..>on which triggered ^^e Am ^^^^^ us 

handled poorly, and the ^^^^ ^^^ commemo- 

bomb was qiuhp 



^. ^.^^^^ 



I 



PAGE 120 / 




I 



/ PAGE 121 



The 

Tulane 'Jock' 

Circa 1971 




by Joel 
Henderson 



PAGE 122 / 



Situation; Jim the Jock meets Walter the Whimp on 
the sidewalks of McAlister. Immediately a stereotype 
is formulated in the mind of each party. Walter the 
Whimp makes the assumption that Jim the Jock, 
along with his short hair, white socks, forty-four inch 
chest, and Tulane T-shirt, represents the lowest of 
Darwin's evolutionary forms. This assumption is due 
primarily to the concept that every Jock, the student 
athlete, is enrolled in the University College physical 
education program. The above concept is. however, 
more myth than reality. 

In 1952, the University administrators decided to 
abolish the physical education major due to 
excessive expenditures by the Department of 
Athletics. With the abolition of the physical education 
major, Tulane began to fall to the lower rungs of the 
tough Southeastern Conference ladder. As the loyal 
supporters of Tulane football looked for a means of 
rebuilding Tulane as a football power, all roads 
seemed to lead to the reinstatement of the physical 
education major, in hopes of recruiting better 
athletes. The groups debating the issue were 
divided, it seems, into those who thought that a 
physical education program would be Tulane's 
"savior, " and those who viewed a physical education 
program as disgraceful to the academic standards of 
their institution. 

The University Self Study, completed in the summer 
of 1968. stated that "the immediate goal of the 
athletic program is to raise itself to a point of 
excellence that is compatible with the academic 
reputation of the University." Statistics prove that the 
reinstatement of the physical education major in 
1968, under the auspices of the University College, 
was neither the "savior" of Tulane football, nor a 
disgrace to the University academically. 

The question arises as to whether or not the success 
of Tulane football in 1970 was a direct result of the 
physical education major. A glance at the academic 
files of those men who made "1970: Year of the 
Green" a reality will answer the question. The 1970 
Tulane Varsity Football team included some 85 
student athletes with only 25 percent of the varsity 
team enrolled in the University College program, and 
53 percent enrolled m the College of Arts and 
Sciences. The remaining 22 percent were enrolled in 
the School of Engineermg. 

Varsity football was not the only sport in which the 
physical education major represented a minority. In 
the minor sports — golf, swimming, tennis, and 
track — there are no men on athletic scholarships 
enrolled in the University College. Of those not on 
scholarship, only one in 20 is a phys.-ed. major. In 
the other two major sports, baseball and basketball, 
similar statistics can be found. Of those athletes 
playing baseball on scholarship, only three of 17 are 
enrolled in the University College. Only two out of 16 
basketball players on scholarship are currently 
majoring in physical education. 




/ PAGE 123 



t 




The student athlete at Tulane seems to have 
been attracted to Tulane, not out of aspiration 
for a professional career, but primarily for the 
chance to receive a first-rate academic 
education in one of the University's fields of 
study. Athletes, upon arriving at Tulane, are not 
so naive as to believe that their sole purpose 
here lies in the achievement of an athletic 
career. Instead, the athlete, just as the non- 
athlete, seeks first to receive a formal 
education. 



Often the athlete perceives his role in the 
manner of the student who works his way 
through school via a part time job. A 
scholarship is not merely a gift; it encompasses 
many hours of fatiguing physical and mental 
work. Those athletes who truly wish to dedicate 
themselves to career work in the physical 
education field make use of the physical 
education program to achieve their goal. It is 
only right that such an institution as Tulane 
should offer these athletes this opportunity. The 
physical education major program is not a 
method for recruiting the less intelligent student 
athlete. Granted, there are those athletes who 
wish to study only physical education, but it is 
not true that physical education, in some form 
or fashion, is of interest to the majority in 
America's society? 



Finally, as our athletic department shifts gear 
and moves into "1971, the Year of the Green 
Plus One," it must be stated that the return of 
the physical education major at Tulane 
University was not responsible for the success 
of Tulane football in 1970. Those who believe 
that the student athlete at Tulane is a 
detrimental academic figure are neither rational 
nor realistic. The reinstatement of the program 
at Tulane has not proven to be an academic 
handicap. Instead it seems that an element of 
pride might exist in the fact that a University 
which offers a physical education program, only 
about 25 percent of the athletes choose to take 
advantage of it. The remaining 75 percent of the 
student athletes are enrolled in the other 
academic fields of study. 

The crux of the reinstatement controversy, 
however, seems to lie not in academics, but 
rather in finance. For the first time in many 
years, Tulane has tasted success on the 
gridiron, and has caught the whiff of post- 
season television revenues and gate receipts. 
There is little reason why this success cannot 
be continued. The nationwide telecast of the 
1970 Liberty Bowl was a giant stride in elevating 
athletics to a level of quality compatible with the 
general "academic reputation" of the 
University. This stride was not accomplished by 
athletes per se, but by student athletes, with 
academic, as well as athletic pride. 



PAGE 124 / 





/ PAGE 125 




RELIGION 

AD 

HOC 




Like many traditions, the close bond between reli- 
gion and man seems to be breaking. Religion has 
lost a great deal of its centrality and sacredness 
in campus life. The chaplains at Tulane, however, 
are attempting to recapture and revitalize this the- 
ological intimacy through their interdominational 
spirit. 

Their endeavor is to spread this fellowship 
among the students, faculty and community by 
different activities. The religious centers have 
many levels of operation, some more manifest than 
others, which have as their central purpose the 
spiritual well-being of people on this campus. As 
one chaplain explained, "We do things in answer 
to needs as they arise, more on an ad hoc basis 
than on some kind of standing committee basis." 
Since the Chaplains realize that students often feel 
a sense of void and emptiness, they hope that the 
services provide a sense of belonging and a feel- 
ing of being accepted. Many centers are attempt- 
ing to speak to the emotional and intellectual life 
of the students in the University in that the services 
are informal and direct. 



Saturday or Sunday worship is not all that the 
Chaplains have to offer, in cooperation with the 
health services on campus, the centers provide 
counseling for their own denominations as well 
as counseling on a non-denominational basis in 
the new Chaplains Counseling Center in the 
basement of Warren. 

Other events consist of regularly scheduled 
suppers open to campus students, and a variety 
of speaker and lecture programs. Besides these, 
the Chaplains offer seminar courses on contem- 
porary theologians and also on historical ap- 
proaches to the Old Testament. In connection with 
these courses, one chaplain said that, "A student 
might choose to accept his faith or reject it. but 
at least he wont be ignorant of it." There is a 
profound need to be Intellectually aware of religion 
in shaping our culture, as well as in the misshap- 
ing of it. independent of whether or not people 
"practice their faith." 

—Diane Burnside 

— Newcomb '71 



/ PAGE 127 




>'«^J 




n 




% 




•-*; 



A 



^ 



A 



# 



# 




ODE TO A NEWCOMB GIRL: 



We'll sing you the story 

Of Harriet Sophie 

Who diediat l^in her bed 

The grass grajt above her 

There's no on^to love her 

Now that she's buried an* dead. 

« 
\^. Sophie i;°« told « 

WSs pure as gold ■ 

<6he was alMrairs innocent and gay 
And Ihfn orfh nigli ' 
Out ofpure'Wespile 
She met Pafel Tulane att4 away. 

Now Paui he tallied sweet 
Swept her right olther (eet ^ 

IHer head w^an innocent maze 
Though J.L^^d taught her 
That she h^n't ought er 
*Poor Harriet SOphle got laid. 

Paul gave her his kisses 

If shed be his missus 

Would love her4o eternity 

But when came the dawn , 

Paul Tulane was gone 

Reaving Sophie heartbroke with v.d. 

One thing we're neglecting 
P^or Sophie was expecting 
Tbeie wasn't a thing to be done 

the coujdn't have marriag# 
<j.she had ■ miscarriage 
Instead of a t^st^ son. 

H. Sophie was weak 
But she just had to speak 
To J.L. this dying retrain 
Build a house for bthers 
The unmjrriad Inothers " ■ 
Caught in the wilds al Tul8he. 

Now there is thy stogr • 

OfHarriet Sophie 

Her fnemory shines like a pearl 

Let's follow tradition . 

AAd carry oLi her mission 

For we are the Newcomb girls. 

—Anonymous 






I'd grown too old for small towns 
and too young for tired people. With one 
trunk of jeans and another of dresses 

I came, I saw, and I put on my 
jeans. 

But then again everyone wore 
jeans — old jeans, new jeans, and jeans 
sans sorority pins. I had to wear my own 
kind of jeans though. 

No one else's fit right. 

I met the people behind the jeans 
and the ideas behind the people. The 
people change, their ideas change 
Them — time — and 1. 

— Myra Zilahy 

Newcomb '74 



PAGE 130 / 




The Newcomb girl is now in as much a state of 
change as is the school itself. Three years ago, my 
freshmen year, the campus population seemed to be 
a very homogenous group. With the exception of a 
small minority of students, the kids on campus gave 
the impression of a blend of basically unconcerned 
nothingness. In the past years, however, a new trend 
has developed; the oblivious attitude which 
dominated the campus earlier is more and more 
being replaced by a feeling of engagement. Factions 
have emerged. And although you probably disagree 
with a lot of ideas floating around here, you must at 
least respect the fact that people are coming forth 
with any ideas at all. This is just one symptom of a 
larger momentum. 

This same shift has come about in the "Newcomb 
image." The prim, proper, "Southern women's 
college" ideal has wallowed in its own vacuum long 
enough. And fortunately, a large percentage of the 
females here have begun to realize this and to do 
something about it. It's not that all the girls are 
running around getting "involved" and setting up 
women's lib clubs; the "qroupies" were here before, 



and I'm sure that they'll be around for a long time to 
come. It's more than that — more subtle. For the 
change that has occurred in the "Newcomb image" 
is a change from something that was so present and 
so obvious that it was almost tangible to something 
that exists so deeply in the girl that it is not readily 
perceived to be an image. 

For the "image" of the Newcomb girl today is a 
"personal" image, an image that adapts itself to the 
individual. And the main characteristic of this 
"image" is the very opposite of what the term 
"image" connotes. This is FLEXIBILITY. The 
Newcomb girl no longer acts only through the 
dictation of the rigid ideal which is deemed "proper" 
to the Southern tradition. She has learned to respond 
according to what she feels and has created a more 
relaxed atmosphere for herself. 

Sure, there's still a 'Newcomb image." but it's a 
different image, a more subtle image, a nicer image. 

Jane Zimmerman 

Newcomb '71 



/ PAGE 131 



.h, 
like 



/0L4»« > • • I 1 0U> 









The Newcomb image is sometimes lost amidst 

relished ideas of Southern chivalry, beautiful belles, 

and conventional stereotyping of the typical college 

coed. A woman attending Newcomb however, is 

neither, although she clings, at times, to the first, and 

usually abhors the second. Her location, style of life, 

and educational surroundings mold her into a unique 

species of coed. 

As a Black freshman at Newcomb. I find that the 

problems and pleasures are numerous. In the end, 

they balance out, and right now, I enjoy attending 

Newcomb. Contrary to popular belief, the Newcomb 

student is not as studious as she first appears, 

although at times (especially before exams) there is 

a furious flurry of study. The biggest flurry however, 

takes place on the week-end, for this is when the 

typical Newcomb woman is at her best — "date 

nights." In one respect, she is no different than her 

fellow college women across the nation — she likes 

men, and is definitely man-hunting. The fact that I'm 

Black would work as a handicap if I allowed it — there 

aren't that many Black men here; and inter-racial 

dating has not yet captured my heart. Heaven forbid I 

should ever attempt to snatch a prospective mate 

from one of my fellow classmates. 

Of the two most important items to a Newcomb 

woman, the second one must be appearance. It is 

only logical. How can one hunt, if one is not dressed 

properly? At this point, there is quite a show of 

individualism. The "typical" Newcomb student may 

be a pseudo-Freak; a jeans girl (that's me), or a real 

dresser. To label one or the other as the typical 

Newcomb image would be presumptious. 

Regretfully, I find that interest in affairs 

surrounding their lives ranks third among my fellow 

"Newcomb-ites." If the reaction to a situation isn't 

apathy, the interest shown is usually close to 

patronizing boredom. The possibilities for 

involvement are manifold for the average student, yet 

on the whole, she chooses to ignore them. 

That is what it's been like to attend Newcomb so far. 

Perhaps some will call this an unfair interpretation, 

but it is what a close look at Newcomb women has 

revealed to me. Happily enough, we black women are 

about as studious, are not losing our minds over 

men, and do care what happens around us. 

Newcomb women, we leave you Women's Lib. 




Independently Variable Newcombness. Come to 

Newcomb only to face Sorority Rush and peer 

pressure to pledge. For what or why matters little in 

the Stream of things. The Stream of Newcombness is 

a reflection of self and defies the use of "image" in a 

mass mirror sense. 

The "Newcomb Girl" is self-professed dilettante; a 
currently unmarketable figure who hassels with self- 
identification, and with the futures game. She is 
variably vulnerable, easily influenced, and ultimately, 
defensive. By the nature of her education, she is 
master of no trade, and must look to other 
involvement for self-fulfillment. She is willing to try 
anything once, if pushed, and tends to 
dabble . . . with Community Involvement; with 
Campus Politics; with Personal Affairs and 
Introspection; even with majors and minors. Quite 
often she doesn't find her niche until Newcomb is far 
behind. Yet the independently variable 
Newcombness goes with her. 

— Marian Shostrom 

Newcomb '71 



PAGE 132 / 



— Candy Capel 

Newcomb '74 







Go to the Head of the Class: A Game 

Number of players: quantity rather than 

quality: increasing annually 
Age Range: tall enough to reach the 

admissions table 
Aim of the game: To sustain the four years 

without the need to visit Dr. Seastrunk or 

the need for a brief interlude in New 

York. 
Preparation for play: braces, contact lenses, 

nose fixing, charm school, and a well 

worn copy of Sex and the Single Girl 
Rules of the game: Rules are so universally 

disregarded that you need only be 

concerned with them if you are stupid 

enough to get caught and be made an 

example of. 
How to play: Stay stoned so as to be 

unaffected by the stimulating Sophie 

Newcomb scene. 
Caution: Forfeit all points earned if God 

forbid you lack a date on Saturday night. 
Bonus: Add 20 points for the regular usage of 

"far out". 

— Cissy Pass 

Newcomb 73 



How a "Newcomb image" evolved, with no 
accompaniment of an "A & S image" or an 
"Architecture image," is another fragment from 
Newcomb's mysterious past. The Newcomb image is 
at least no monolithic picture, however distasteful 
the various segments of the image are: the finishing 
school sorority debutante: the bronzed Floridian or 
Texan sunbathers of Butler quad; the rich art 
student; the copious note-taker with a 4.0 who 
memorizes homogenized notes without considering 
their implications. 

But the Villager days are gone. And I rejoice. I am 
tired of unfair stereo-types. While they do seem to 
apply to some Newcomb students, we should all be 
nauseated at the audacity of those members of the 
community who seek to perpetuate them. 

The question must be asked however, are we 
nauseated? do we accept these descriptions of us? 
Most of all, do we Newcomb students ourselves 
perpetuate them? 

We are not fighting against the images, we do indeed 
prolong them. And the images appear to be changing 
to other equally disgusting ones. It is possible, for 
example, that the Newcomb technical virgin has 
changed from the feminine equivalent of Joe College 
to a Joe Hippie. The archaic syndrome of sorority- 
girl-turned-neo-freak is banal. It is time to repudiate 
both categories of sorority-sweet girl and no-bra- 
dope-smoking chick. Our individuality is confined 
into enclaves we did not seek and do not deserve, 
yet seem to want. 

Which brings us to another question: Structurally 
speaking, where are we positing an identity? Are we 
Newcomb students, members of Tulane-at-large. 
residents of New Orleans community? Yes. we are all 
three, and more, but in what order, what priority? 
What are our responsibilities to each and to 
ourselves? 

You see. very few of us really think about it. Very few 
of us would allow conflicts between the three parts of 
the Venn diagram. The problem as to how we define 
ourselves — not just ourselves qua ourselves, not 
merely ourselves per se — but within this rubric, this 
context, is preeminent. 

And partly because we do not define our position, we 
are more easily subject to impositions by other 
people. Unless a Newcomb student makes deliberate 
moves against it. and often even when she has, she is 
typed within quotation marks, becomes a proverbial 
Newcomb Bitch, and is other-defined. It is time for us 
to stop letting our lives be measured out 
in coffee spoons: it is time for a Newcomb 
student to be self-defined. 

— Louisa Rogers 

Newcomb 73 



/ PAGE 133 



uow- like h> 



A Recapitulation 

An artful snare, and the chauvinist Jamb editor 

chuckles behind his blueprints. Our thoughtful little 

essays vilify the old visage, reinforce the new, 

proclaim widened horizons, changing awareness, 

and a better "typical Newcomb girl". Yet we have 

failed to grasp the primary annoyance — being 

tricked into defending ourselves at all. Our vocal 

patchwork inadvertently admits that (1.) there is 

indeed a "Newcomb image" and (2.) that the 

"Newcomb image" is (or was) true. And however 

thoroughly we repudiate a stereotype, we have 

simply sewn one more tightly to our backs. 

It is hardly the time for self-defense. The only 
"Newcomb image" at Tulane was spawned by 
men — not women, and is the function of male ego, 
not female ineptitude. The Newcomb girl is a 
"Newcomb dog" — studious, plump, bespectacled, 
and unattractive — when Tulane can do without her 
(generally early freshman year while the high-school- 
stud halo lingers and male pride remains delicately 
intact.) She is suddenly a "Newcomb bitch" — gold 
digging, spoiled, conceited, cold — when Tulane's 
lopsided genital ratio becomes apparent and it is 
damned hard to get a date with her. In neither case is 

she labeled fairly. 

Nor does the usual male grumbling produce sound 

advice. The Newcomb girl is simultaneously (A.) a 

lusty manhunter playing the future game; (B.) a 

haughty, frigid, don't-touch-me chick with a virgin 

complex; (0.) a sloppy dope-smoking freak; (D.) a 

prim white-gloved slice of sorority row; (E.) a 

useless, unmarketable dabbler in experimental 

psych, Nicolas Berdyaev, and the population 

explosion; and (F.) an all-too-dedicated Women's 

Lib-er prefering careers to babies, adventurous 

creativity to cleaning the toilet. The complaints are 

clearly incoherent; the complainants superficial, 

sanctimonius — even whiney. 

It is curious indeed that no "A & S image" 
accompanies the supposedly tangible Newcomb 
one. Turnabout is fair play and defining A & S (or any 
other college at Tulane) would amuse us. But 
perhaps Newcomb girls don't choose to deal in 
stereotypes. Perhaps we see our male counterparts 
as separate human beings — fluid, indefinable, many- 
sided. Perhaps over-simplification disgusts us; we 
relate to personalities, not formulas, and our vision of 
mankind — even Tulane mankind — is 
expansive. ... In seething summation, a 
mature appraisal of the "Newcomb image" should 
cast doubt on you thimbleheads applying the term. 
Are you insulating yourselves? Sanctioning a retreat 
from the Newcomb girl? If you really knew who we 
were, you wouldn't be fingering our image\ 

— Martha Harris 

Newcomb '70 



PAGE 1S4 / 



THE 1970 HOMECOMING COURT 




^.i_«j^^ ;■ : ■»«; 



PAGE 136 / 



AND THE BEAST 



EDITOR'S JOURNAL 



Anti Sexist (?) Homecoming 



It all started at a party m Ben 
Smith's back yard. Collins 
Vallee said to me. "You know, 
about the most sexist thing 
around that school is the beauty 
contests," I said. "Yeah." He 
said, "How about running a guy 
for Homecoming Queen?" 
We never thought that the 
Alumni Relations Committee 
would accept the nomination of 
a male, but the HULLABALOO 
and Student Senate submitted 
nominations of two males each 
anyway. Eventually, I crashed 
a meeting of the committee and 
got them to change the rules. 
Collins Vallee, Paul Baxter, 
Ralph Wafer, and a fourth can- 
didate (who prefers to remain 
anonymous) were all invited to 
the selection tea held at Alumni 
House. Ralph and Collins were 
the only ones who showed, but 
they had a nice time and were 
given blue-and-green-striped 
ties with the Tulane crest on 
them. Needless to say, the 
selection committee did not 
approve our boys as nominees. 
The next step was to get our 
candidates before the public 
eye, give them a chance for 
recognition, and most impor- 
tantly, COMBAT SEXISM. We 
decided on a "guerilla booth," to 
be set up next to the "real" elec- 
tion booth. In the spirit of liber- 
tarianism and free-thinking, we 
also decided to let anyone who 
wanted to be a candidate in our 
election do it. 

Someone ran out and recruited 
some guys who were sitting 
around in the Rathskeller, and 
the show, as they say, went on. 



^^^^^^^W by (Aargaret Blain 

There was Collins with a flower 
coming out of his fly; there was 
Matt Anderson in my scarf, car- 
rying a parasol, fluttering the 
plastic Japanese fan Allen Gins- 
berg gave me, and looking like a 
mail-order bride from the prison 
farm at Angola; there was Bob 
Schwartz blowing bubbles with 
his bubble gum (getting if all 
over his moustache) and strad- 
dling a large bamboo pole. 
Eventually, there was Ken Opat. 
Ken came in wearing yippie- 
style (Uncle Sam) clothes. 
Everyone kept saying that 
someone (of the candidates) 
should take off his pants for his 
pictures. And lo and behold, 
there was Ken Opat, dropping 
trou. 

The rest is history. Ken won, 
primarily because he took off 
his pants in front of the camera. 
Now, I ask you, does that or 
does it not prove that Tulane is a 
sexist institution in a sexist 
society? 

When we put up the board with 
the pictures {fine photography 
by Bud Brimberg, Third Eye: art 
work by Leon), we labelled it the 
"Anti-Sexist Homecoming 
Court." It was sexist. Its greatest 
triumph was in actually being 
just as sexist as the establish- 
ment homecoming court (there 
were no female candidates), and 
in revealing to every liberated, 
anti-sexist one of us that we are 
just as sexist as the next guy 
(even the cliches are 
sexist . . .). 

THE TULANE HULLABALLO 
NOVEMBER. 1970 




/ PAGE 137 






Emily Barnes 
& Lory Lockwood 







^tfSJtfSna :■ 




Ji/« 



Darlene Hildreth & Maria Davis 





Judy Ross & Diane Burnside 





Sunday 
after 

noon 




FA'Gf 








/ PAGE 141 



Sunday afJternoon 





/ PAGE 143 





PAGE 144. / 



sandanr afternoon 







I PAGE 145 







PAGE 146 / 





Sunday afternoon 




I PAGE 147 



I 



"POETS AND im WORDS 



n 



I 




In October, the Fine Arts and the Lyceum 

Committees initiated a new type of 

program which was to be a three-day 

poetry symposium entitled "Poets and 

Their Words." Plans called for five 

modern poets, Denise Levertov, Allan 

Ginsberg, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, William 

Everson, and Nikki Giovanni, to do 

readings of their own works on Thursday, 

Friday, and Saturday, October 19-21. On 

Sunday afternoon, Tulane students and 

faculty were to be given the opportunity 

to read their original poetry. 

However, the result was something new 

and exciting. The symposium turned into 

an academic festival. The Tulane 

community responded to the program 

with tremendous enthusiasm, and there 

was an intellectual atmosphere which 

developed throughout the community. 

A great deal of the success of the 

program must be attributed to the poets 

themselves. With the exception of 

Levertov and Giovanni, all arrived in New 

Orleans earlier than expected. Everson 

and Ginsberg were particularly 

fascinated with the Tulane student body, 

and were more than willing to attend 

classes, parties, and discussions that 

were planned for them by the two 

committees. 

The poets, though all diverse and 

individualists in their work, generally fit 

into the category of the radical eccentric 

poet. As a result of pre-symposium 

publicity of this fact, over 2000 people 

participated in the program. On both 

Thursday night (Levertov and Ginsberg 

presentations) and Friday night 

(Ferlinghetti readings) McAlister 

Auditorium was sold out for the readings. 

However, as a result of the Soul Bowl 

held on Saturday afternoon, the audience 

for Saturday night's readings was 

considerably less in number. For those 

who did have the opportunity to view 

Saturday night's readings, many 

considered the readings by Everson to be 

the most intense and inspiring of all. 




PAGE 148 / 




/ PAGE 149 



Following completion of the program, 

many have examined the meaning of its 

success. It seems as though the 

enthusiastic support of the symposium is 

an indication of the ability of Tulane to 

accept innovative events. 

Whereas this type of program is generally 
considered commonplace in universities 
throughout the West and Northeast, it is 
relatively new to the South and especially 
to Tulane. It is the hope that such a forum 
can be accepted as a common happening 
at Tulane throughout the years to come. 

For those connected with the poetry 

symposium, it was an unforgettable 

experience. The intensity of the minds of 

the poets left lasting impressions on 

those persons in their company. The 

informal atmosphere which prevailed 

throughout enabled anyone interested to 

reach a poet with questions. From open 

interviews with Hullabaloo WTUL 

reporters, to open-house parties at 

students' apartments, to merely sitting on 

the U. C. quad during the day, the entire 

program was open and friendly. 

It has finally been realized that programs 
presented by University Center 
Programming Board committees are for 
the benefit of the students and faculty of 
Tulane, and all measures must be taken 
to insure more contact between the 
programs and the University community 

as a whole. 



—Bill Boyer 

A&S 73 






iiA 




/ PAGE 151 



OCTOBER 24 



! 




PAGE 152 / 



MOOM 
rUUXNE STADIUM 




/ PAGE 153 



OCt 24 




PAGE 154 / 



Tulane may never have seen anything like it. Six 
nationally knov\/n rock and soul music groups 
performing one after another in the middle of Tulane 
Stadium one Saturday afternoon in October. 
Headlining the show/ . . . some of the biggest 
names in Soul — James Brown, Ike and Tina Turner, 
Isaac Hayes. In the stands, and then on the 
field . . . tens of thousands of toe-tapping, swaying, 
singing, dancing Orleanians. An incredible profusion 
of colorful costumes . . . bright purple jump-suits, 
gold net see-through shirts, huge flaring orange bell- 
bottoms. There is no doubt that the staid old 
University on St. Charles Avenue received at least a 
small infusion of Soul that day. 






/ PACE 155 



OCT. 





It was. of course, a disappointment that, because of 
the huge cost of putting it on. the Soul Bowl did not 
in the end raise any money for scholarships to 
minority group and disadvantaged students — the 
purpose for which it was conceived in the first place. 

And even more disappointing to the student, 
faculty, and administration organizers was the failure 
of so many Tulane students and other local whites to 
attend, though whether out of disapproval, fear, lack 
of interest, or whatever it was hard to say. 

The most heartening aspect of the day's events was 
the large turnout by New Orleans' Black community: 
maybe at least a small start toward closer ties 
between campus and ghetto was made that day. And 
that in itself seemed a strong argument in favor of 
holding a second Soul Bowl next year, when (with 
the benefits of one year's experience) a considerable 
profit might well be made. But. in any event, there 
was obvious satisfaction among many of the 
hundreds of Tulanians who had worked to make the 
show a reality. In view of their inexperience and the 



difficulties they had faced, it was quite an 
accomplishment for the event to have taken place 

at all. 

It is true that there were some lengthy delays 
between some of the acts. And that the concessions 
ran out halfway through the eight hours. But once 
Junior Walker began blaring out the music from his 
thunderous saxophone, once Tina Turner and the 
Ikettes started shaking their fringes and wailing of 
their hopeless loves, once Isaac Hayes doffed his 
great fur cape and launched into his seemingly 
endless soliloquy on "By the Time I Get to Phoenix." 
once James Brown bounced up from a full split and 
shouted "i Wanta Make You Scream," who cared 
about minor troubles? 

The day was warm and beautiful, the crowd was 
enthusiastic, the music was infectious. 



It was an occasion not soon to be forgot. 



-Bruce Eggler 




kJ 




\y 





PAGE 158 / 




/ 




You do know Agnew finished 

college? I spend about 98°o of my 

time today on college campuses for a reason, that 
simple reason, you young folks in America, you're 
probably the most morally honest, ethically 
dedicated, committed group of young people ever 
lived in the history of this country, bar 

none We old fools have left you 

youngsters a hell of mess to clean 
up. . . ... Rockefeller spent 8 million dollars 

so he could run for Governor, again! For 8 million 
dollars. Hell, I could run for God . . . and 

win! We can not solve our problems 

confronting America today with political muscle. It 
has to be statesmanship ability Forty- 
four million Americans go to bed every night hungry. 
hmmm. Law and Order? Law and Order. 
hmmm. , . 



/ PAGE 159 




PAGE 160 / 



. . . Looks like it's going to be 
another depression. Sure is. Niggers never got out ot 

the first one I was so damn glad Nixon 

got elected . . . black folk knew for the first time 
that we didn't have a friend, that we'd have to get it 
ourselves. . . ... Only Dick Nixon could take 

the riots out of the black ghettos and into the white 
suburbs. White kids runnin' down the streets with 
signs, "Get Whitey". . . ... Respect the 

police? If the cop that patrols your community, was 
the heathen that you sent to patrol my community, 
you would only not respect him, but you would have 
wiped his ass out a long time ago. . . ... I lived 

in the black ghetto. At five years old, I knew what the 
whore looked like. At five years old, I knew what the 
pimp looked like. At five years old, I knew what the 
hustler, the bookie, and the dope pusher looked like. 
I just can't believe that at five years old I was that 
much smarter than the police. . . ... Treat a 

man like a pig, he'll onk. . . ... Dick Nixon is a 

home-grown American boy Understand 

repression. Repression is more detrimental to the 
oppressor than the oppressed. . . ... Ask five 

year old kids in the ghetto to draw a picture of 

himself, he draws an animal The 

cowboy has one fringe benefit, when he gets him a 
nigger or an Indian, and that fringe benefit is simple: 
all Indians and all niggers look 
alike. . . 

. . . Only prejudice . riots, 
hunger, — America — , could cause a comedian to 
become an enraged, philosophical reactionary. 

Phillipa Anderson 

Newcomb '73 





/ PACE 161 




gBOARD 



The University Center Board, comprised of four officers 
and the chairmen of the eight programming committees, 
is the arm of the Student Senate responsible for 
providing extra-curricular entertainment and educational 
events for the Tulane community. Due to the 
cosmopolitan nature of the campus, the great variety of 
taste, personality, and age, and to some extent the 
apathy of members of the University community, it is 
difficult to program to the approval of everyone. 

The Board is a student-run organization. Participation in 
the Program at all levels, from committee membership to 
being on the Board itself, is open to all students, and 
only students, on a voluntary basis. Each of the eight 
committees is responsible for programming a specific 
interest area and determining the type of events desired. 
The success of a committee's programming depends 
upon the input value of each committee member: his 
awareness of the desires of his fellow students, his 
knowledge of the field served by the committee, and his 
willingness to work and carry out the program. The 
results can be seen in wide range of programs offered 
this year: the Poetry Symposium, free flicks, Buffalo Bob, 
Latin American Week, TGIFs, the Bridal Fair, and 
numerous art exhibits. 



PAGE 162 / 





/ PAGE 163 



Due to inflation, however, tlie financing of programs has 
been a big problem for the chairmen. The rental cost of 
films alone has tripled over the past two years, big name 
entertainers demand $10,000 to 15,000 per performance, 
and even the price of beer has increased, limiting the 
number of free TGIFs. This has made it necessary for the 
Board to request a larger budget each year just to 
maintain programming variety and quality from the 
previous year. 

The increased activities fee, voted into effect second 
semester, lightened the financial restraints allowing 
Spotlighters to bring the New Seekers, Lauro Nyro, and 
Jeremy Storch; Lagniappes to co-host the Iron Butterfly 
with Loyola, bring higher-quality bands for the spring 
dances; and Fine Arts to sponsor three performances by 
the National Shakespeare Company. 

Such financial responsibilities require justification of per 



capita expense in determining the size and nature of 
each program. For example, Spotlighters committee 
must face the question of spending $10,000 for a concert 
in McAlister which will be attended by 1500 Tulane 
students (or fewer), or using the funds instead for weekly 
TGIFs and entertainment in the Rat, which during the 
year would reach more people. Lyceum must decide 
whether they will bring three major speakers of general 
interest, or many special interest speakers for smaller 
groups. This year, concentration has been centered on 
the big name entertainment and speakers, helping to 
build the image of the Board, and interest in the 
committees, but efforts also have been made to improve 
the quality and number of other events, such as Open 
Stage in the Rat, Lyceum's backing to bring the authors 
of TUT's spring productions, and Recreation's speaker 
on mountaineering. In addition to this, if a certain group 
of students feel that their needs are not being filled by 
one of the existing committees, they may petition to 




PAGE 164 / 



become a Programming Affiliate of the Board and 
receive financial underwriting for the program which 
they plan. There have been two Programming Affiliates 
this year: one group produced the play, Anything for a 
Rush, and the Mexican-American Student Association 
received financial backing for its programs. 

This spring, the Board rewrote its constitution and by- 
laws to allow more flexibility within the structure. Two 
new committees were created, Cinema and Travel. Other 
committees such as Hospitality and Cosmopolitan were 
redefined, allowing broader fields in which to operate. 

Some students complain that the University Center Board 
is a closed-minded, bureaucratic, self-perpetuating 
organization which takes a large "chunk" of the 
student activities fee, without yielding a proportionate 
amount of entertainment. This may have been true in the 



past, but the Board has changed and evolved with the 
new trends of student life and thought. If a student has 
complaints about the programs being offered, it is not the 
total fault of the Board, but also the fault of the student 
who refuses to offer his complaints in a constructive 
way, by taking advantage of this open, student-con- 
trolled system, and working to implement his desired 
changes, either from within through the committees, or 
from without through Programming Affiliate status. 
Hopefully, more students will take advantage of the 
experience provided by such participation and decision 
making by cooperating and working with fellow students 
to achieve a certain goal — the success of a committee in 
providing entertaining and/or educational activities for 
fellow members of the student body. 



— Sharon Carrigan 

Newcomb '71 






I PAGE 165 



media 



PAGE 166 / 




/ PAGE 167 




KEVIN ALLAIN / 1 

RONALD NIERMAN / 2 

MITCH BARBER / 3 

LEE WILKIRSON / 4 

TONY LANASA / 5 

TOM IRELAND / 6 

MIKE SIMPSON / 7 

RICKSTREIFFER / 8 

ALAN LOEB / 9 

PAT SCHUSTER / 10 

PAUL BAXTER / 11 

JUDYMOFFIT / 12 

L.M. BLAIN / 13 

LINDA WILLIS / 14 

AT THE BUREAU: 

FRANCISCO ALECHA 

FRANK COYNE 

JIM DALFERES 

BLAINE LEGUM 

CHRIS MOORE 

ILEANAOROZA 

MIKERUDEEN 

ANDI SERVOS 

CINDY STEVENS 




PAGE 168 / 



The Hullabaloo has this year, as usual, 
gone through its share of staff 
members, associate editors, editors. 
The stamina, the dedication, the sheer 
energy needed to face the pressure of 
meeting a weekly deadline each Friday 
has taken its heavy toll. 

Still, It seems that the paper has suf- 
fered little from its traditional staff turn- 
overs, success has been made in turn- 
ing out a paper of consistent high qual- 
ity The Associated College Press has 
awarded the Hullabaloo an "All Ameri- 
can" rating for the fall semester, when 
Margaret Blain took over the editorship 
from a retiring Tom Ireland. 

Miss Blain in turn handed over the 
editorship to Pat Schuster in the spring 
semester, stating that she wanted to 
establish a policy of changing editors 
according to the calendar and not the 
school year, in order that the new editor 
could benefit from "being broken into 
the office." Although only a sopho- 
more. Miss Schuster has seemingly 
taken her new position in stride, thus 
portending at least a possible success 
for the paper in the upcoming school 
year. 

Fortunately enough, both Ireland and 
Miss Blain have remained on hand to 
help the paper and its too-small staff. 
Possible friction between the old-timers 
on the staff and a large new generation 
of reporters and editors has to a large 
extent been avoided or overcome; in 
any case, next year the paper will be 
composed entirely of staff members 
who were not on hand two years and 
who will have to handle all aspects of 
putting out the paper themselves. This 
semester has been a good, and a nec- 
essary proving ground for them. 

The paper has suffered from a short- 
age of reporters who would later be 
in a position to move up onto the edito- 
rial staff. This can be attributed to a 
number of factors, not the least of 
which has been the necessity of pro- 
moting the few good reporters the 
paper did have to editorial positions 
only weeks after they had first entered 
its basement offices. Nevertheless, the 
Hullabaloo has had a larger crop of 
senior reporters who could be called 
upon from time to time to handle stories 
the rest of the staff has had no time 
for or to go into some in-depth report- 
ing on specific issues. One of the great- 
est problems in the upcoming year, 
however, will be to insure that more 
reporters, who are both good and de- 
pendable, will be writing for the paper 

This year's paper has tried to reach 
more elements of the campus commu- 
nity than it has. perhaps, in the past. 




A mark of its success in this regard has 
been the large number of letters and 
"One Man's Opinions" the paper has 
received. The student senate president 
has been given a column, as well as 
the photography editor; the editorial 
pages have been expanded; the whole 
editorial quality has been improved; 
and an excellent series of articles con- 
cerning the whole communications 
media in New Orleans has been pub- 
lished. Film Week and Scenes have 
provided drastically needed services 
forthe University community, giving the 
best list of events happening on or off 
campus that is to be found in any city 
publication. Bulletin Board continues to 
provide its needed services. 



DAVID MAGRISH 
DAVID FINKEL 
MIKE KUTTEN 



The Hullabaloo has had its share of 
problems this year. The technical qual- 
ity of the paper has dropped during the 
spring semester. Some intra-office fric- 
tion between old and new members of 
the staff has developed, thus mitigating 
the camaraderie needed to keep staff 
members working and to function as 
a well-oiled and happy unit. The Hulla- 
baloo will undoubtedly face difficult 
problems in the upcoming year. But 
then, it has always seemed to eventu- 
ally overcome whatever shortcomings 
it might have, at least until new, dif- 
ferent ones spring up. 

—Jim Dalferes 

A & S '71 



/ PAGE 169 



JAMBALAYA 



STAFF 

FRONT: 

TRICIA HOPKINS 
MATT ANDERSON 
SHELIA SILVER 

BACK; 

RICKSTREIFFER 
WYLIE DAWSON 
JON BLEHAR 



ARTISTS 

BILL CLARK 

RUSTY JOSEPHS 

FRANCISCO X.ALECHA 

TOM PELLETT 




Publication 
Photographers 



not pictured: 

Matt Anderson 

Bud Brimberg, 3rd Eye 

Farrell Hockemeier 

John James 

Mike Smith 




/ PAGE 173 



I 




Frosh 

& Student 

Directory 



JON BARNETT 
RICHARD BRETZ 




PAGE 174 / 



Tulane 

Law 

Review 



The Tulane Law Review, now completing its 45th year, is 
a scholarly legal journal published quarterly (December, 
February. April, and June) by honor students from the 
Tulane School of Law. The Review publishes articles by 
heading legal commentators — scholars, professors, 
judges, lawyers — and by students on the Review. Its 
current circulation is about 2,000, including one of the 
highest foreign circulations of any law review in the 
country. Because it is located in Louisiana, the only state 
using the Civil Law as its basic law, the Review has 
traditionally concentrated on the Civil Law and the 
Louisiana Civil Code and has become a major authority 
on the Civil Law. Comparative law and codification have 
also been of special interest to the Review. While 
maintaining its civilian traditions, the Review has in 
recent years broadened its scope into areas of the law 
that are of a more national interest and that are more 
relevant to contemporary legal, social, and economic 
problems. 

— William E. Brown 
Law 71 



1/ David F. Edwards 

2/ Bruce M. Horack 

3/ William L. Guice 

4/ Robert R. Casey 

5/ Anita H. Ganucheau 

6/ Charles B. Hahn 

7/ W. E. Noel 

8/ Cynthia A. Samuel 

9/ Joseph L. Parkinson 

10/ James A. Burton 

11/ Lawrence P. Simon 

12/ Andrew L. Plauche 

13/ Clinton W.Shinn 

14/ Walter C. Thompson 

15/ William E. Brown 

16/ William N. Kammer 

17/ Rutledge C.Clement 

18/ Edward 8. Dubuisson 



19/ Judy N. Tabb 

20/ Machale A. Miller 

21/ P. J. Stakelum 

22/ Donald A. Shindler 

23/ Sergio A. Leiseca 

24/ Helton G, Marshall 

25/ David A. Marcello 

26/ Harry A. Rosenberg 

27/ Robert E. Washburn 

28/ Irving 8. Shnaider 

29/ Thomas T. Steele 

30/ Geoffrey H. Longenecker 

31/ David A. Kerstein 

Missing: 

Gerald A. Bosworth 

Kenneth E. Meyer 

Malcolm A. Meyer 




This year's editions of the Frosli and the Student 
Directory were the efforts of primarily two people. 
Jonathan S. Barnett and Richard Bretz. Frosh '74 
provided a brief pictorial essay of student life on 
campus and in New Orleans. For the first time, 
freshmen received the publication JDrior to their 
arrival at Tulane. with a glimpse of what to expect in 
September. The Student Directory received a big 
assist from Bill Nelsen. Director of Records and 
Registration. His registration records were the 
source of the names and telephones of the 
students. As a result the Directory was the most 
accurate ever published and was available in early 
October. For the first time in many years there were 
no severe criticisms of either publication. 

-J.S.B.andR.B. 



/ PAGE 175 




PAGS 176 / 




1/ Ian Shupeck 
2/ Greg Kopp 
3/ Al Agricola 
4/ Ann O'Brien 
5/ John Ramirez 
6/ Tom Planchard 
7/ Dave Epstein 
8/ Kathi Zemann 
9/ Don Newcomb 
10/ Alan Orkin 
11/ Marty Dietelbach 
12/ Rick Calcote 
13/ Gary Gerson 
14/ Cathy Doran 
15/ Steve Bancroft 
16/ Sam Hills 
17/ Kerry Barnett 
18/ Annette Breazeale 
19/ Scott Gardner 
20/ Steve Murphy 
21/ Adrian Dickstein 
22/ Don Oliver 



23/ Bob Schwartz 

24/ Jeff Chilldon 

25/ Ladson Webb 

26/ Jerry Clark 

27/ Mary Beth Curtin 

28/ Larry Kaiser 

29/ Ed Porter 

IN STUDIO B: 

Steve Bancroft 

Bobbie Bledsoe 

Jill Ehrenberg 

Scott Gardner 

Ellie Hellman 

Amy Kotick 

Marty Nasdan 

Steve Rappeport 

Dave Ream 

Bob Ruderman 

Dynamite Slade 

Greg Stec 

Robert Thompson 




/ PAGE 177 



PAGE 178 / 



Metropolitan 
New Orleans/ 

population: 
1 .3 million/ 

two daily 
newspapers 



'news papers ; 




/ PAGE 179 



It is only natural that the cinema is the art 
form that today's student is interested in, for it 
is the Twentieth Century's major contribution 
to the field so long delineated by such 
standard art forms as the play, the epic, the 
novel, and the poem. 

Here at Tulane, we have witnessed the birth of 
a course in appreciating films, as well as 
workshops in photography, camera technique, 
and film making. 

Students are also as interested as ever in 
attending movies, perhaps now with a slightly 
more critical eye. The movies of 1970-71, as 
shown by the major Hollywood producers, 
have indicated a desire to capture the college 
audience; to make their products "relevant" to 
today's society. In this, some have 
succeeded; many have failed. What is 
particularly deplorable are those producers 
who seem to think that a certain "formula" is 
all that is necessary to insure financial and 
critical success. 

The following review is of such a movie, 



T.H.E. 

Hollywood 

Formula 

By Jim Dalfares 




S'T'U'D — produced by Joseph E. Levine, 
directed by Stanley Kubrick, screenplay by 
Harold Robbins, adapted from the book by 
Gore Vidal, music by Burt Bacharach, starring 
Charlton Heston, Rex Reed, Clint Eastwood. 
Senta Burger, and Mickey Rooney: with 
Caesar Romero. Flip Wilson, Desi Arnaz, Joann 
Worley, Woody Allen, and the Guatemalan 
Army. A Paramount Pictures release in 
Panavision and Technicolor and color. 156 
minutes. 

S'T'U'D is an adaption of the timeless story 
of the Prodical Son, illustrating the conflict of 
the generations as well as the sociological 
process of initiation into manhood. Since 
Turgenev, modern art forms have tended to 
emphasize the political turmoil between 
fathers and sons (and mothers), and S'T'W D 
is no exception. In this tasteful adaptation by 
Harold Robbins, however, the son returns 
home not to seek forgiveness but rather to 
burn down the farm. 

If this is indeed a film for all ages, its relevance 
to the contemporary scene is soon made 
explicit. The father (Charlton Heston) is the 
President of the United States. Rex Reed 
plays his rebellious son Harvey — a liberated, 
gay, college radical. 

Father's troubles are overwhelming. Besides 
having to deal with problems of National 
Security and helping to stop a riot in the 
college his son attends, his all-precious time is 
consumed by trying to squelch rumors started 



by muckraking journalist Chill Wills (always 
on the lookout for "moral degenerates") that 
son Harvey has just been picked up by the 
vice squad on a morals charge for going 
AC/DC in D. C. with a black beauty queen 
named Geraldine. 

Harvey's troubles, across the generation gap, 
seem no less formidable. His ideological 
commitment is on the radical left, but he is not 
man enough to hold a gun and level it to a 
pig's head. He is alienated from his 
background, but his Weathermen friends soon 
ostracize him for "copping out." He can never 
take full control of a situation. 

Fortunately for Harvey, Heston rescues him 
from his internal turmoil by acting as a deus 
ex machina (he's had a lot of practice) and 
seeing to it that Harvey is conscripted into the 
army. 

Harvey tries to fail his physical by getting 
turned down on a Section 8, but to no avail. In 
a brilliantly conceived black comedy sketch, 
the Army psychaitrist (Woody Allen) lisps, 
"The United Thtates needth more tholdiers like 
you." 

The remaining 30 minutes before the 
intermission is taken up by the subplot, in 
which Heston is scheming to embroil the U. S. 
in a war so that the special forces contingents, 
which have recently returned from a war "in 
Southeast Asia" can go fight somewhere 
else — anywhere other than U.S. shores. 



PAGE 180 / 



^ 



w ^<' ^J I 1 QJ ( 



150¥3H0WlM^n I \ 




uU('lr//40l|/'Mlf///0ll///: 



Kj ^^' L.j — K^ — y,:^/ ' \^ - ^^.^.r - v.-/ 




Pulling out a C.I. A, directive for such an 
emergency, Heston learns that in the past, 
whenever the U. S. has been faced with the 
dreaded reality of the blood-lusty Marine 
returning home, she has involved herself m a 
war south of the border so she could ship out 
the Marines at first opportunity. Heston 
therefore maps out a plan for the overthrow of 
the dictator (Caesar Romero) of a Central 
American banana republic. 

As luck would have it. Harvey is assigned to 
one of the head units leading the invasion task 
force, known as S'T"U*D (so secret a 
detachment that Its full name Is never 
revealed). S*T"U"D, led by Colonel D. L. Doe 
(Clint Eastwood) is trying to place a puppet 
ruler (Desi Arnaz) in the governmental palace. 

Just before the fadeout ending the first half of 
the movie, we see that Harvey has not yet 
changed, and that it will take S'T"U*D to 
make a man out of him. Instead of practicing 
calisthenics and bayonet attacks, Harvey 
spends all his time oiling the bore of his M-16 
and rubbing linseed oil into the stock. 

By the start of the second half, we see that 
Harvey is finally becoming acclimated to 
Army life. I.e.. learning to kill with pleasure. In 
one terse scene, an exasperated Doe however, 
tells Harvey to "get thee to a nunnery." an 
order that he takes at face value. There he 
meets a winsome Sister Virginia (Joann 
Worley). and he soon puts his army training to 
good use. 



After raping the somewhat reluctant nun of 
Monterrey, Harvey feels that he is now a man 
since, as he explains, he has "made it with a 
woman." In a brilliant soft focus shot, director 
Kubrick captures Harvey's grim determination 
and his viril fortitude as he mows down a 
village of peons with his machine gun. 

In subsequent fighting around the Presidential 
palace (the one used for Bobbins' "The 
Adventurers"), Harvey's skull is grazed by a 
rifle shot, and he later wakes up in a guerilla 
jungle village with a complete memory loss. 

Nursed back to health by a demented 
Albanian dwarf in exile (Mickey Rooney), 
Harvey is fed only cornmeal and Maoist 
propaganda by the dwarf's interpreter (Senta 
Berger), since the guerilla leader himself 
speaks only the Serbo-Croat, 

His mind dazed by amnesia. Harvey is only 

the more receptive to Marxist rhetoric, and he 
is programmed by Senta Berger to lead a plot 
to assassinate the President of the United 
States; the guerillas not realizing that the man 
is, in actuality, Harvey's father. 

The irony of Harvey's relationship with his 
father Is fully realized. Before, Heston decried 
Harvey's radical attitudes and his 
unmanliness. He had him dratted to make him 
a man. Now though, Harvey has become man 
enough to become the real radical 
revolutionary who returns home to burn down 
the farm. 



Harvey quickly infiltrates the net of security 
surrounding the President, not understanding 
all the while, how he knows where the Secret 
Service lookouts are posted. 

He enters a darkened room: a light in the 
corner illuminating only a man bent over a 
large oval desk. Raising his revolver. Harvey 
is on the point of squeezing the trigger when 
the rising crescendo of his emotions. In turn 
triggers his memory, and he realizes what he 
is about to do. 

In the climatic scene which follows. Harvey 
confronts his father with all his fears, his 
frustrations, his sublimated hostilities. He 
reprimands his father for "not accepting me for 
what I am " In the tear-)erklng reconciliation 
that follows, we learn that father and son are 
not completely devoid of communication with 
each other, as Heston falls to his knees and 
embraces his son. 

In the epilogue. Harvey is found back in 
college, his lather is content once again with 
having only World War III to worry about, and 
Harvey finds eternal bliss with an assistant to 
an associate deputy undersecretary of Health. 
Education, and Welfare. 

Rex Reed certainly delivers a commanding 
performance, worthy of an Oscar nomination 
at least, Kubrick, Levine, and Robblns have put 
It all together in S'T'U'D. so if you want to 
know where it's at, this is one you shouldn't 
miss. 



/ PAGE 181 



MONACHINO 
& SUMMER LYRIC 




The Tulane Summer Lyric Theatre began in 1968 as a joint 
venture by the Department of Theatre and Speech, the 
Department of IVIusic, and the Center for Teacher Educa- 
tion. For each of the past three summers, Lyric Theatre 
has presented a series of three musicals or operettas. The 
program has grown from an experiment into a fully recog- 
nized, permanent, University program, offering graduate 
and undergraduate credit in each of the three depart- 
ments. 

The creator and director of the program is Francis 
L. Monachino, associate professor of music. The 
JAMBALAYA interviewed Monachino in December. 

Monachino joined the faculty of Newcomb College irl 
1967, coming from the University of Southern Mississippi. 
Prior to that, he had had a 17 year career as a profes- 
sional singer in New York. He has worked with such peo- 
ple as Gian Carlo Menotti, Mike Todd, Laurence Olivier, 
and Leontyne Price in the original television presentation 
of "Tosca." He appeared monthly on NBC for 12 years, 
and he has made appearances on Omnibus, and the Hall- 

PAGE 182 / 



mark Hall of Fame. In addition, he has performed with 
numerous opera companies. 

From its conception, Monachino has felt that Summer 
Lyric Theatre should be a "showcase for regional talent." 
The University is an ideal setting for this type of endeavor. 
Here one can find available, existing facilities, a base of 
community support, administrative services, and faculty 
members qualified to direct the various aspects of the 
program. In return. Lyric Theatre offers talented students 
and faculty a chance to gain valuable experience and 
work side by side with professionals, and it offers the 
community a form of entertainment that might not be 
available otherwise. 

In the past. Lyric Theatre has offered such shows as 
Carousel, The Sound of Music, The Mikado, The Pirates of 
Penzance, and The Merry Widow. Plans for the 1971 
season include Die Fledermaus, South Pacific, and The 
Vagabond King. In 1972, the program will be expanded to 
four shows, and plans now call for extending the opera 
workshop part of the program to include presentations 
during the regular school year. 




What does it take to get an audience to something like the 
Summer Lyric Theatre? 

First you have to come to an understanding of your audi- 
ence. If you decide that the purpose of your theatre is en- 
tertainment, then you put your emphasis on people, the 
people in the audience, and the people on the stage . . . 
and there is nothing to be ashamed of in that. 

Once that choice is made, then what does one do? What 
do you do here? 

You try to create an atmosphere where everyone is com- 
fortable. Up until the 1950's, people went to the theatre 
precisely to be entertained. That doesn't mean that from 
time to time a play doesn't come along to instruct — 
Winterset is a good example. Plays also have "messages, " 
but a play that is just message is not really a play. So, the 
person that has a message usually tries to cloak it in an 
entertainment package. People have stopped going to the 
theatre because they don't have a good time. No one 
enjoys going to the theatre to be instructed in their social 
consciousness. Now that's not saying that the message 
doesn't have validity; it may have all the validity in the 
world. But it is like a religious message. People aren't 
going to church either. People just aren't comfortable 
being preached to. The^e has been this change to Europe- 



an pessimism in the hands of great artists — Sartre and 
lonesco. And this change has taken place on stage, too. 
Essentially there are two ways of looking at man. through 
rose colored glasses or blue — steely blue — cold glasses. 
And right now we are looking through blue cold glasses. 

What about the New Orleans audiences? 

Strictly rosy. People enjoy commg to Summer Lyric 
Theatre. Think of the creature comforts we offer. We serve 
refreshments for practically nothing. We encourage 
children to come, which makes it easy for a man and wife 
to bring their family. And the audience has some feeling 
for what they are seeing, some familiarity. After all. the 
American musical theatre is something we are brain- 
washed in. But it is also renewing something. Doing the 
type of theatre we do is, of course, an exercise in nos- 
talgia. New York and London, for example, are renewing 
old shows. No No Nanette and The Vagabond King. Old 
movies. Laurel and Hardy, Bogart, have a wide followmg. 
even the old movie techniques are being used. It's like a 
Max Sennett comedy. But nostalgia is not the only 
influence by any means. Art moves forward rapidly. Hair is 
already passe today. Art is both a reaching back and a 
moving forward. 





■| 


■ 


■ 




^m 


W 




^Hb i '"^ 


^^gpj 


HI 


ui 









Don'i people still use this tendency towards nostalgia to 
draw crowds? 

Sure. Everyone tries to get the crowds. Anyone who thinks 
that MaratlSade isn't a crowd pleaser doesn't know what 
they are talking about. 

What do you think of what happened at La Mise En 
Scene? (This refers to the raid by the New Orleans Police 
during a performance of MaratlSade which resulted in the 
closing of the show.) 

I think it is extremely unfortunate. I had seen the Royal 
Shakespeare Company production, but they used older 
people. This production was more a gathering of young 
people. Of course, obscenity is in style now. There are 
movies in town far more obscene and they are completely 
exonerated. 

What do you think will happen with the plans to bring 
in Hair? 

I have a hunch that they are going to try to keep Hair out? 
Hair has, of course, played in many other places. But I 
think that they may have been trying to serve warning to 
the people bringing in Hair. (We are informed as of April that 
the Civic Theatre did cancel the planned engagement.) 
What can be done to improve the arts at Tulane? 
Our arts are channelled through student activities as con- 
trasted with some of the great schools of fine arts, where 
it is considered important and handled as an academic af- 
fair. 



What about bringing in the National Shakespeare Com- 
pany? Doesn't that suggest that Student Activities is 
taking a more serious approach to the arts? 

That is booking. Something like that is handled by a com- 
mittee as it should be. But that's different. No, it's difficult 
to suggest that chorus and theatre and opera workshop 
be removed from student activities. 

Do you think we need more facilities or just more money 
channelled into the old ones? 

We need both. Being realistic, new facilities are not likely. 
We need a lightning rod for money. This means that the 
programs have to expand — very carefully expand as 
we grow. 

How do you see Tulane students in relation to the arts? 

Tulane students are culturally deprived. They are exposed 
to the arts, but they come, in the main, from homes where 
the emphasis is not on the arts. They become critics too 
soon. One would hope that they would stop being critics 
for awhile and pick up a paint brush, or study an instru- 
ment for ten years or join a summer musical company. 
One would say how marvelous that they are reaching out 
and exploring, feeling and getting the sensual kicks of 
this experience. Our people withdraw into self-contempla- 
tion rather than becoming a part of these things. We 
need to do. 

Summer Lyric Theatre is a success, isn't it? 
Yes. We are now a permanent program. People in the 
community are now raising money for us, and we are in 
the black. We hope to have a little profit to put towards 
opera during the regular year. I'd like to have $5,000 for 
an opera. Old Baroque operas or modern operas which 
are not getting produced. I don't know how the students 
would buy this, but we owe it to the students, the Universi- 
ty, and the community to try. Here is an example of how 
you build an audience. I'm giving them their candy during 
the summer. Lyric Theatre is the candy store, but then in 
1972, Summer Lyric Theatre is being expanded to four 
shows, with more opera workshop performances planned 
during the regular year. 
What motivates you? 

I think it is my feeling about performers. Regional oppor- 
tunities are what is needed. The thing to do is develop a 
theatre which is not based on the star principle. People 
don't come to our performances to see a name; they come 
because they have a good time. And the cast has a good 
time and gains valuable experience. 




PAGE 184 / 




What would you prescribe for students here /n order to 
overcome their cultural deprivation? 

I would prescribe that people jom a musical organization, 
that they join the theatre, that they get involved. And this 
may strike some chords that hurt, but they should stop 
thmking automatically that they have extraordinary ex- 
pertise at the age of 18 or 19. They should be willing to 
learn from someone who is being paid to teach them. The 
idea that to get together with some friends and do the 
same thing you've always done — that this is some great 
mstructive device — is fallacious. 

You seem to have some rather unusual ideas for a 
professor. Not to put it in political terms, but you seem to 
be both liberal and conservative at the same time. 

Well. I like to think of myself as a true revolutionary. 

- Greg Ridenour & Matt Anderson 




/ PAGE 185 




campus nitei 




FIRST ROW: 

Dick Sparpstein 
Pat Lee 

SECOND ROW: 

Robby Smith 

Lie Steele 

Steve Jones 

Sondra Daum 

James Guyer 

Susie Davidson 

Hal Crocker 

Lucile Page 

David Carey 

Patti Prescott 

Punki Burghauser 

Dwight Bowes 

Alma Cuervo 

Fred Herman 

THIRD ROW: 

Jim Merrill 
Helen Sneed 



PAGE 186 / 




) 





"Confessions of a Carpathian 
Chanteuse", whicfi opened Wednesday 
night and runs through this Sunday, is a 
witty musical-comedy concerning the 
plight of a jinxed summer theater. 
The plot revolves around the director's 
(Robby Smith's) attempts at organizing 
a cohesive show under impossible 
conditions: his two stars (Punki 
Burghauser and Dwight Bowes) are a couple 
of back-biting narcissists trying to 
regain their former professional status. The 
sets delivered to the troupe are 
hopelessly mixed up. and underlying it all 
are some just as confused love affairs. 
The resulting play-within-a-play is 
an outrageous series of flubbed lines 
and upstaging, and the consequences are 
just as surprising. 

Co-authored by Don Oliver and Patrick 
Shannon, the story flows naturally, and 
the humor ranges from broad satire 
to the sharp cutting exchanges between 
Burghauser and Bowes . . . Oliver has 
also composed the musical score which is a 
high point of the production. He has obviously 
been influenced by good show music, but 
this is not to say the score is in any way 
unoriginal . . . coupled with the score are 
Annette Harper's fine lyrics. No lines are ever 
forced, and they can be funny ("The 
Innuendo Tango"), satirical ("Ah! Love!"). 
or touching ("I Guess Someone WillTell Him"). 

Flashy sets and costumes are critical 
to this type of play, and "Confessions" has 
them — thanks to Richard Gaines, The sets 
are bright and harmonious and can change 
rapidly with a minimum of distraction. His 
costuming is colorful without being gaudy. 
except in the cases of Burghauser and 
Bowes where they are suitably tawdry. 
The only flaw in the opening night 
presentation seemed to be the 
choreography. Only about one-third of the 
songs were dance numbers and these 

seemed strained as expected. 

the actors were a little shaky during the 
opening night first act. but by the second 
act they were in complete control and put on 
the steam. The cast is to be praised for 
braving the less-than-perfect acoustics 
of Dixon Hall and emerging successfully . . . 



CHRIS MOORE 



Tulane Hullabaloo 

March 12. 1971 



Kuypers 

at 

Seventy 





PAGE 188 / 



Being free from fhe obligafions 

and regimens of the musical 

profession is a state to which 

John Kuypers is not accustomed, 

but not one alien to his nature. 

However, his retirement this year 

from a 45 year career in music 

has released him into such a 

state. This imminent retirement 

caused Kuypers to become the 

subject of several articles in the 

local news media, including an 

interview broadcast by WWL-TV, 

in which he looked back over the 

first 70 years of his crowded and 

active life. 

Kuypers began teaching at 

Hamline University in 1932 when 

a cut on his hand temporarily 

forced him to quit playing the 

viola with the Minneapolis 

Symphony, a position he had 

held since his 1926 graduation 

from Carleton College, where he 

had majored in English and 

music. Since that time he has 

taught continuously, with the 

exception of one semester. 

Though his first experiences with 




i 




JHi 








^^^ 


^^H 






l^gV. ^' 




^ 


TV 



New Orleans came through the annual tour visits of the 
Minneapolis Symphony, Kuypers' first teaching job here 
was as a visiting professor at Dillard University in 1958. 
He began teaching at Newcomb in the fall of 1960 as 
director of choral activities, which involved the training 
and direction of the Tulane-Newcomb A Cappella Choir. 
In addition to his teaching, Kuypers has been very 
involved in the music life of New Orleans. He has 
directed the Concert Choir of New Orleans since 1959. 
and he has appeared as guest conductor with the New 
Orleans Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra a number of 
times. 

To his teaching, Kuypers brought a love for and 
personal involvement with his subject matter. His 
lectures were sprinkled with stories from his longtime 
study of musical history, and with anecdotes on 
conductors, fellow orchestra members, and certain 
works from his days with the Minneapolis Symphony. 
These, his thorough knowledge of the works 
themselves, and his frank comments on the life and 
problems of the professional musician combined to 
make his courses fascinating, and even thrilling. 
Apart from music, Kuypers' greatest love is the sea and 
sailing on it. He has been fascinated by the sea since 
boyhood: at the age of 13. he sailed to India from his 
native Holland as an apprentice sailor. This love for 
sailing has never diminished. He taught several people 
here how to sail and regularly spent a good deal of time 
sailing on Lake Pontchartrain. 

Upon his retirement, Kuypers is moving to Italy. He will 
spend his summers near the sea in a villa at Arpino 
which has belonged to the family of his wife, Donatella, 
for four centuries. "I have no plans for doing anything," 
he said. "I will simply follow my fancy," 

Lee Wilkirson 
A. & S. '74 



ACAPELLA CHOIR A CAPELLA 




SOPRANOS: Christine Boyer, Mary 

Carrigan, Susie Cooke, Lisette 

Hays, Jenny James, Rose 

McCabe, Margaret Miller, Peg 

Miller, Nanette Mollere, Guamnetta 

Plummer, Linda Raspolich, Shelley 

Seaman, Jan Shanhouse, Janet 

Taylor and Nancy Williamson. 

ALTOS: Stephanie Arthur, Carol 

Coleman, Jane Faulkner, Kathy 

Hagaman, Janet Hume, Ram 

Jones, Chachi Martinez, Ann 

Muller, Diana Nadas, Debby 

Olivera, Debbie Sabalot, Karin 

Swenson, and Connie Zendel. 

TENORS: Alan Hill, Ray Johnson, 

Jerry Mercier, Dick Orwig, Emmett 

Price, Bill Toups and Keith 

Wismar. BASSES: Tyler Apffel, 

David Carey, Bob Dawalt, David 

George, Lee Goodman, Steven 

Hartberg, Charlie Hill, Roger 

Longbotham, Bob Mendow, and 

Russell Weaver. 





PAGE 190 / 




CHAMBER CHOIR: Stephanie 
Arthur. Susie Cooke. Bob Dawalt. 
Lisette Hays, Alan Hill. Janet 
Hume. Pam Jones. Roger 
Longbotham. Chachi Martinez. 
Bob Mendow. Jerry Mercier. Peg 
Miller. Emmett Price. Jan 
Shanhouse. Karin Swenson. 
Russell Weaver. Nancy 
Williamson, and Keith Wismar. 




/ PAGE 191 





The Arena 
30, 31 and Nov. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, ] 


1 






o 

Br 

O 



sr 



P. 






CD 



o 

~* o 

^ ^• 

^^ ^ 

o ss 

I-- sr 

•-' o 

- s 

I— ' CO 

Ins n 



^ 



OS 



> 



o 



I 

00 




hS 









to 



CO 

>9 



PAGE 192 / 



HE SPRING OF 1967 was certainly a dark period for 
Tulane's Department of Theatre and Speech, During 
that semester, six of the nine faculty members 
resigned their positions at Tulane. Among them was 
Dr. Monroe Lippman. the man who had initiated 
theatre courses at the University in 1937. and had 
served as Chairman of the Department from the time 
it was created a few years later. Not only did the 
Department lose many of its valuable personnel, but 
it also lost the nationally known and respected 
Tulane Drama Review, a scholarly magazine devoted 
to the art of theatre. The sudden and drastic 
reduction of the faculty also necessitated 
cancellation of the doctorate program in theatre. 



Those of us who remained in theatre were 
determined, as was the University administration, 
that theatre at this institution was not to die. Of 
course, we had to reassess our capabilities in 




/ PAGE 193 




theatre education and production, and redefine our 
goals. But we knew that a valid and valuable theatre 
program was possible within our limitations, and 
under the leadership of George W. Hendrickson, we 
began to rebuild. 

One of the problems with the former Department was 
that it had, to the detriment of the undergraduate 
studies and activities, become top-heavy with 
graduate programs. When I first arrived here, the 
number of graduate students in the Department was 
almost ten times the number of undergraduate 
students. For a Department that had started out as an 
undergraduate extra-curricular activity, this result 
brought many priorities into question. 

We felt that one of our responsibilities in 
reorganizing the department was to strengthen the 
undergraduate program and make it the core of our 
activity. The two graduate programs, the Master of 
Arts and the Master of Fine Arts, would then take 
their proper place as extensions and elaborations of 
that central undergraduate core. 

To accomplish this, the undergraduate major and its 
courses were completely revamped and enlarged. 
Many of the advanced graduate courses were 
opened to undergraduates as electives. And in our 
production undergraduates became the foundation 
of the talent pool, both onstage and backstage, 
where they had once been elbowed into the 
background by graduate actors and technicians. 

While dealing with these matters "at home," we also 
had to correct the widespread notion over the rest of 
the country that Tulane Theatre had been laid to rest. 
Advertising and personal contacts helped. But such 
recent attention as our production of Oh What a 
Lovely War being chosen to represent the State in a 
National Theatre Festival is our best weapon against 
this "rumor of death." 

Where is the Department of Theatre and Speech 
today? We have a strong and varied Bachelor of Arts 



PAGE 194 / 





program with 32 majors, each getting training and 
experience in all areas of theatre with opportunities 
for advanced study in each area. We have a strong 
academic degree in the Master of Arts program. And 
we have the Master of Fine Arts programs and pre- 
professional advanced degrees in the areas of stage 
design and directing. Production activity is at its 
height, with major productions. M.F.A. graduate- 
student-directed shows, studio performances, one- 
act afternoon productions, and classroom exercises. 
Workshop series in acting and body movement are 
filled to capacity. Performers and teachers have 
come to the University for special performances and 
training sessions. 

Theatre dead to Tulane? — Don't believe it! 

—Larry Warner 



/ PAGE 195 



'*, ./*^y,.. 



^^^ 





rfOI-l'WHATA 
LOVELY WAR! 

"M'lords, ladies and gentlemen, may we present for 
'^^mmgBt- you the ever-popular War Game!" 

With these words and the crack of a whip, the eighth 

and supposedly final public performance of Oh What 

A Lovely War began. However, who of us realized on 

that evening of December 13, 1970, that this was not 

to be the culmination of five weeks (seven days a 

week, including Thanksgiving recess) of rehearsal. 

Who ever imagined that this was'not good-bye to the 

play which had once again made the Tulane 

University Theatre an integral part of the Tulane 

Campus . . . Oh What^a Lovely War was just 

beginning its career as "the show that never died," 



pa«;f. 196 / 





^H 


■ 


^^^^^^H^^^^^^B^^^^^^^^^^^^^^IP^B^^^^^^^H 




^H 


H 






H 


I 


1 


j^^Hi 


HB 


^H 




E^^ 


iJli 


1^. 




^^^B^^Bfl 



This play had been different from the very 

first day of auditions, when "experienced 

TUT actors" had been called upon to sing 

and dance in order to be considered for a 

role. There had been problems: the little 

lady in Washington, D.C., who all alone 

handled the rights to "Lovely War" in the 

United States, but who was never available 

(she only worked part-time) for information 

about the size of World War I slides; the 

posters that didn't quite mal<e it; the 

handwritten score that no one could seem 

to play; and "Uncle Roy" Longmire 

constantly wailing that we just didn't have 

any more money. 

However, there were the advantages: 

tremendous actor training stemming from 

the need to change roles about twenty 

times during the show; grueling dance 

rehearsals yielding better body control; 

and the discipline gained from knowing that 

one had to be exploding with energy for 

every performance, because pace, timing, 

and bright eyes were so important to this 

show. 

The play had cost a lot, and so we had to 
be sure to" have large audiences every 



night; that is, large audiences that would 

like and understand the show, and would 

encourage their friends to come. 



Attempts had been made in the way of 

direction to make the play more relevant to 

American college students of the Viet Nam 

era. The style of the beginning of the play 

was changed from that of a pierrot show to 

a minstrel show, a form of theatre more 

familiar to American audiences, and then, 

the viewer was gradually eased into the 

very British sort of humor — and 

history — which dominated the play. A 

very Brechtian newspanel rolled out 

statistics in Allied-Chemical style, with 

messages such as; "ALL QUIET ON THE 

WESTERN FRONT . . . ALLIES LOSE 

850,000 MEN IN 1914 . . . "Meanwhile, 

pertly dressed actors sang and danced the 

songs of that period. The contrast between 

the oblivious joy of the people and the 

deaths on the battlefield was poignantly 

displayed in this manner. 



Publicity was even different from the usual 
sort, being highlighted by a parade through 



all the cafeterias on campus (excluding 
C.R., where we were banned) during 
lunchtime on the first Friday of the play's 
run. Armed with costumes, props, and a lot 
of guts, the singing cast met applause and 
received recognition wherever it went. We 
also had full houses just about every night 

afterwards. 



Perhaps one of the greatest moments of all 

came with the arrival of a telegram from the 

American Educational Theatre Association 

on the day after we "closed" telling us that 

our production of Oh What A Lovely War 

had been selected to represent Louisiana in 

the Region V conference of the American 

College Theatre Festival. We were 

surprised and happy to hear that the 

University had responded to our need by 

offering to foot the bill. (Uncle Roy was 

elated!) 



Once again there were problems. Dance 

numbers had to be re-worked for a bigger 

stage, and two cast members had to be 

replaced. This meant a whole new series of 

rehearsals — this time in Dixon Hall and/or 




PAGE 198 / 



the Cram Room. However, despite the 

natural complaints, there was still a 

tremendous enthusiasm and unity which 

sprang up within the Department, because 

at long last, something we were proud of 

had been ostensibly appreciated outside 

the Theatre Department. 

On the morning of January 19, we all 

boarded the bus for Fort Worth, where the 

festival was to be held. That evening we 

pulled into the Worth Hotel and nervously 

awaited the upcoming performance the next 

day. 

The show went well, despite our inability to 

use the important newspanel due to 

technical difficulties. We were all awed by 

the comparative extravagance of the Scott 

Theatre (the new IVIet compared to our 

Phoenix Playhouse), as well as by the 

quality of the majority of the productions. 

Five states were represented by seven 

plays. We saw them all, made many 

friends, and gained invaluable experience 

in theatre. 

Although Tulane was not chosen to go to 
Washington for the national festival, our 



local reviews were quite good, and two 

members of the cast were given awards by 

AETA for their individual performances. Of 

the twelve such awards given, eight were 

given to actors from the winning shows. 

We brought back memories, friendships. 

and regional recognition for Tulane, as the 

kind of theatre school it had once been. 

And. happily for all concerned, TUT 

Players were able to bring to Tulane the 

director of one of the winning plays to 

conduct a weekend acting workshop for 

theatre majors as well as for the cast of 

Campus Night. 

Obviously, "Lovely War" was lovely, and 

performing once again for the alumni on 

tVlarch 28 was an honor and a pleasure. 

For Tulane University Theatre, thanks to 
.his play: 

"A little further we will go, oh, oh, oh, oh. 
Then we'll drop both our oars 
Take a round of applause 
And then we'll go, go, go." 

— Alma Cuervo 
Newcomb '73 






/ PAGE 199 



tf 



The Tulane campus acceptance 
of ROTC is another case of "isn'f's. 
It isn't militantly hostile nor 
enthusiastically supportive. In 
the wake of prior years' demon- 
strations, the worst harrassment 
the freshman cadets and mid- 
shipmen have received is good- 
natured kidding from acquaint- 
ances. At the same time, ROTC is 
no longer touted as the repose of 
the most dynamic, talented lead- 
ership on campus, even by the 
commanding officers. The mood 
now seems to be one of accep- 
tance of ROTC as a valid option to 
those who desire it, and harmless 
to those who don't. Cadets are no 




PAGE 200 / 




longer considered to be war- 
mongers, and those opposed to 
ROTC are no longer considered 
criminal anarchists. 
To the ROTC participant himself, 
things are considerably different 
from prior years. Curriculum 
changes in all three programs 
have changed the ROTC class 
from a crib "A", busywork course 
to a serious academic effort. Par- 
ticularly in the Army program, 
changes have included the insti- 
tution of history and political 
science courses taught in the re- 
spective Arts and Sciences de- 
partments, and the introduction of 
academic study of management 




and leadership in the military 
classes. As a result, the ROTC 
curricula at Tulane are consid- 
ered among the best and most 
progressive in the nation. This 
was borne out by the ROTC 
freshmen, who generally praised 
their classwork as interesting and 
challenging. Still around, howev- 
er, are regulations concerning 
hair, dress, and discipline: these 
seemed to represent the area 
which elicited the greatest 
amount of dissatisfaction among 
the cadets and midshipmen. 
One of the more sustaining 
aspects of the ROTC picture 
which is not generally known or 




1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 



AIR FORCE enrolled 

scholarships 

ARMY enrolled 

scholarships 

NAVY enrolled 

scholarships 



200 112 

(not available) 23 




appreciated is the University 
Committee on ROTC Programs. 
This year, the committee, which 
began as an ad hoc committee 
resulting frorn the ROTC demon- 
strations, was formally chartered 
as a permanent University com- 
mittee. Composed of seven facul- 
ty, two students, one adminis- 
trator, and the three senior ROTC 
officers, the committee serves as 
the governing "department" for 
the ROTC programs at Tulane. It 
is empowered to "advise the uni- 
versity ... on all matters con- 
cerning ROTC Programs at Tu- 
lane", to "review all ROTC 
courses . . . about both content 
and University credit", to review 
and make recommendations on 
all new ROTC officers proposed 
for faculty duty at Tulane (with full 



veto power over appointments), 
and to "hear appeals from 
students enrolled in ROTC on 
matters concerning their academ- 
ic standing in ROTC" (quotes 
from the Committee charter). 
These., extensive powers are a 
direct result of objections raised 
by students and faculty to the 
operation of ROTC at Tulane. 

In the spring of 1971, it seems 
more appropriate to write of what 
ROTC at Tulane isn't, instead of 
what it is. That ROTC prepares 
students for commissioning in the 
armed forces, and includes 
classes, drill, and summer train- 
ing is generally known. What is 
not known, even by many of those 
in the ROTC programs, are some 
of the profound, if subtle, changes 



which have taken place in recent 
years. 

Participation in ROTC has quite 
obviously experienced a signifi- 
cant decline. In interviews con- 
ducted with the unit senior com- 
manding officers, the consensus 
opinion was that this is due at 
least in part to the general 
decline of the image of ROTC and 
the military as a whole. Even in 
the short span of four years, the 
change in attitude from one of re- 
spect and admiration to one of 
reluctant tolerance has been 
noted by many observers. Col. 
R.W. Aronson of the Army astutely 
characterized this disenchant- 
ment with the military as periph- 
eral to the larger "national 
debate" over our goals and val- 




PAGE 202 / 




ues, which has been motivated by 
questioning of the American in- 
volvement in Southeast Asia. 
Other reasons suggested for the 
decline are lower draft quotas, 
the initiation of the lottery system, 
and the reduced activity in 
Vietnam, whereby many college 
students feel less threatened by 
the likelihood of induction. 

So why join ROTC? A number of 
freshmen related that they en- 
tered with the intention of waiting 
to learn their lottery number, and 
then continuing on to the ad- 
vanced program or dropping out 
on the basis of their number. 
Indeed, the attractiveness of 
serving one's military obligation 
as an officer rather than as an in- 
ducted enlisted man was the most 



frequently cited reason for joining 
ROTC. The scholarship programs 
offered by ROTC also attracts 
some participants. The number of 
scholarship recipients, who re- 
ceive full tuition and fees, 
increased while the total enroll- 
ments decreased. In fact, for the 
academic year 1970-1971, Tulane 
received approximately $330,000 
in scholarship tuitions from 
ROTC. Proposed legislation rela- 
tive to establishing an all-volun- 
teer armed force would almost 
double the total number of schol- 
arships available nationwide, as 
well as increasing the monthly 
stipend paid to each recipiant 
from $50 to $100, in order to at- 
tract more participants. Tulane is 
one of the few universities to still 
offer its student body a choice of 



all three ROTC programs. Next 
year, pending university adminis- 
tration approval. Air Force ROTC 
will begin accepting women in the 
advanced program, leading to a 
commission in the Women's Air 
Force. 

Perhaps ROTC will not survive at 
Tulane, especially if selective ser- 
vice is eliminated. But for now. 
ROTC offers a choice to those 
who desire it. brings considerable 
scholarship monies to Tulane. 
and is attempting to improve and 
bring the ROTC programs up to 
the academic level and responsi- 
bility expected of any other 
department in the University. 

—WALTER LAMIA 




/ PAGE 203 







\ 







(^ ^ — _ ' -i' 



k , 



4X' 




^ 



^ 

N 















1 



v\ 



.!)'■ w y 




^ n (» 




I 



» .■ t 



Qrrnr-j 

^-^^ ^ c^ ._^ ...a^ ^ ^ .^ ^.< . ^ ---^- Y 

, / ^..„^.. -- ^^~— ^ ^ ^^' -' 6 ' 



V*MrN_<[^ 



'^^^ ^ iJ «-) -^^o->^ ■f^'-r-^ -.<v— ^- , T^I^ cO 







x^s^-^A^ 



I PAGE 205 



i^s^^o 



^ ^ Yt. ^^ ^' ^j^-— (^ CM .Ur <U^ l^i^t^ ■ '-^ ^ 




u-^i. -fe ^ --3 •/-- -^--- -^-' ^^,^ p-uu -. .^ ^ 

Jt 4 —J- -<U -UV -i--!^ '— ^-A^--'' "^- "• iK' 



V ^^-^ --- ^—^ -^ ^^' ^-.t'-^ 












cUj 



PAGE 206 / 




Matt, 

It would appear that I have been quite negligent in conveying 
any thoughts to you, but the situation is always one of confusion 
and general chaos. I suppose that you have heard by now that 
I'm stationed in Korea. I've never been so cold. Seoul is one of the 
most polluted cities in the world, and they just started to industri- 
alize in the late 50's. Without the U.S., Korea would be one big 
garbage heap. We are greeted here with open palms and very 
little else. A couple of generations of Koreans have learned to 
play on the sympathy of the average G.I. Away from home and 
with few friends, the G.I. usually searches for a little entertain- 
ment. The clubs here play American music, the prostitutes dress 
like American girls, and the G.I. winds up spending his paycheck. 
I am keeping away from all that because it's just not for me. I'm 
angered at the double standard of many who come over here. 
They write home about the hardships and loneliness, yet they 
keep what is called a "moose" for about $100 a month. What she 
is, is nothing more than a steady whore. Americans are ob- 
noxious as hell and try to push a lot of these people around. 

You would love the attitude of a lot of guys here. They all con- 
sider the Army a great big joke. We go to work each day and 
forget it after 5 P.M. Everyone plays the Army game for what it 
is. There is always a lot of discussion and people keep their 
minds healthy. The whole peace movement has not been in vain. 

I can remember how the yearbook once was so antimilitary. 
and I wholeheartedly agreed. Being in the military now, things 
have changed a good bit. Being a soldier is a rather thankless job. 
Nobody wants to be away from their home, family, and friends. 
We agree with the objectives of the peace movements, but are 
rather limited as to what we can do. You know how the military 
judicial system works. Kids shouldn't condemn us all as if we 
were the criminals. We are fighting our own battles within the 
Army, and we have won a few concessions. The Army is scared 
of what can happen. We just don't take orders without question. 
All of us are men who think of what the situation would be like 
back home if we just followed blindly. Please try to make the 
kids back home understand how we feel. There is nothing in this 
world that we want more than peace. Whenever they see a sol- 
dier, they should try to smile and not curse at him. We have 
decided to play the game for a short while, then go out into the 
real war to change the world. School is fine and entertaining, but 
there is so much more. One has to be committed, not to a grand 
scheme, but to his fellow man. Don't be pushy about it. just be 
honest. 

I'm sending this small drawing executed during a fit. Also, it 
you want to print some of my letters, go ahead. I shall probably 
hear about it, but I must be heard. You can edit all you want — in 
other words whatever would be most dangerous to me. Let me 
hear from you. 

Peace, 
Chief 



/ PAGE 207 



.|AMII\I.AYA 1971 



MATT ANIIERSUN 



l»RIN«:iPI.K ACCMMI'I.ICES 
FRANC:iS<:<> \I.E(:iIA. JIM IIAI.FAKKS. 

wyi.ie itawson. i*atri<:ia hopkins, 
kic:k strkiffkr. am> siifii.a silvkk 



ARTW<»RK 



FRAN«:i.sf;<) Ai.E«:iiA/ 76, 98, 179. nii.i. ri.ARK/ 17. 
20. 12. RisTV josF-Piis/ 26-;{5. tom pellet/ 61, 
104. 

photography 

MATT anofrson/ rover, i, 8-9, 10-13, 46, 47, 58 
(lowtT n.). 39 (lop). 60 (loji, mill., lower left), 62, 
66 (lifl), 69 (nii.l.), 70-71. 73-7.'>, HA, 106. 109, 
110-113, 111-117, 121, 122.12.S, 126-127, 136-139. 
110-115. M6-I17 (ihhI. .-inil lioi.). 148-149. 1.50 
(l.oi.), 151 (lop), 153 (rl.), 1.56. 1.59. 160 (lop). 
161. 162-165. 169. 174. 182-191. 193-199. 201. ri<:k 

l>RAKE/ 90-91. STEVE FEPER/ 88-89. EI.LEN 

ha><:kki./ 38 (top), farrei.i. iiorKEMEiKR/ 2-3, 5, 
I 1-15. 18-19. 24. 37. 38. 41. 43, 41, 49. 58 (hot. 
Irfl), 60 (l.ol. rl.). 64, 65 (rl.), 66-67. 69 (l.fl & 
iirl.). 77. 78 (lioi.), 79, 80, 81 (lop l<fi ^ ••m-). 96- 
97. 128-129. 150 (lop), 151 (lioi.). 170-171. 17.3. 
177. 179. 202-203. .ioiin .iamks/ 146-147 (s.- 
<liiini<). damp i.AN<;sroN/ 157. t«im i.ee/ 22-23. 

AARON NAVAIl/ 100-101. «:OI.VIN NORW«»OI»/ 50, 55. 

p\T PRINS/ 92-93. MIKE smith/ 6. 45. 59 hoi.). 
63. 72.84.86-87.91-9.5, 102. 118-120. 1.30. 132-133. 
1.52-153. 154. 1.55 (lifi), 167. 168. 176, 208. Har- 
old SYLVESTER/ 160 (bol. rl.). 



'(IT" 




TULAN 



NE\A/ ORLEAN 



VOLUME 



JAMBALAVTV 



UNIVERSITY 



LOUISIANA 



4 / ARCHITECTURE 
10 / ARTS & SCIENCES AND NEWCOMB 
54 / J. Y. A. 
58 / ENGINEERING 
66 / COMPUTER CENTER 

68 DELTA REGIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER 
70 / GRADUATE SCHOOL 

84 / GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 
88 GRADUATE ENGINEERING 

92 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MEDICAL RESE.4RCH AND TRAINING 

93 / HEBERT CENTER 

94 / SCHOOL OF LAW 

100 / SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK 
104 / SCHOOL OF MEDICINE 
114 / LODGES 



Fifth Year 




PAGE 4 / Architecture Seniors 



MIKE MATASSA / 1 

CHKIS KMGH T / 2 

ROC.KK IIKOWN / 3 

.MAH^ s( IIAI IJ / 4 

UESSIE WVMA> / 5 

JERKV STEPHKNSON / 6 

PETEK SMII.KSINGER / 7 

HI I>V IIAKTO> / 8 

JOHN HA.NNA / 9 

lUHJ OEMAFU <) / 10 

JAMES SAI.MI / 1 I 

I.KWIS <,H Vf.m / 12 

I'KIUfi ( OUKI II / l.'i 

E\E VAI.KVIINE / 14 

KALI'll WAtEH / lo 

KE.N LEVINE / 16 

nil.I. STAI.EY / 17 

MI< HAKI, M IS / 18 

BOIl CAMPFIEI.I. / 19 

I.EE IRK E / 20 

MIKE <;ahiiom / 21 

lULI. UAER / 22 

RANDOLPH VON BREYMANN / 23 

MANIEI. DEI-EMOS / 24 

HENRY 1)1 PI.ANTIER / 25 

JOH HI KMVK / 26 

WYLIE HAWsoN / 27 

JEFF <.ARin / 28 

BETSY BALDRIIM.E / 29 

STEVE MANN / 30 

ON THE BIS: 

BOB FLACK 

CEORfiE MILLER 

GROVER MOLTON 

BOB RICH 




/ PACE 5 





Fourth Year 



1 / DALE ZINN 

2 / ANN QUARLES ZINN 

3 / JOAN KING 

4 / BOB FATOVIC 

5 / ALVIN COX 

6 / BRYAN THOMPSON 

7 / LEE TMCE 

8 / CHARLES MCGEE 

9 / JEFFREY ARMITAGE 

10 / DR. BERNARD LEMANN 

11 / JAMES REID 

12 / SHELDEN CANTOR 

13 / ANTHONY TAFFARO 

14 / AARON NAVEH 

15 / SAM CRAWFORD 

16 / DANIEL SIGAL 

17 / ROBERT WILSON 

18 / JOHN DRYE 

19 / RON BARLOW 

20 / HAROLD PIQUE (SKIP) 

21 / WALTER DALY 

JURY WEEK CASUALTIES; 
RICHARD BAUMANN 
WILLIAM CAMIN 
JOHN HOBBS 
JACOB KATSMAN 
GEORGE KELLY 
MARY MCELROY 
NICHOLAS MUSSO 
HENRY POTTER 



PAGE 6 / Architecture Undergraduates 





Third Year 



1 / JOHN SAIBER 

2 / DONALD BERG 

3 / WILLIAM KENDRICK 

4 / JOHN FERNSLER 

5 / MIKE MASON 

6 / BILL SEALY 

7 / BOB LE-VY- 

8 / LARRY WIZNIA 

9 / ANDY SPATZ 

10 / PALL NAECKER 

11 / STEVE NEWMAN 

12 / BRIAN SAYBE 

13 / GARY CONNOR 

14 / COLLINS HAYNES 

15 / TAYLOR BLOOD 

16 / KEITH HOOKS 

17 / LLCAS CAMBO 

18 / STEVE RICK 

19 / RICHARD REEVES 

20 / JANE EVANS 

21 / ANDRE \TLLERE 

22 / STEVE GARDNER 

23 / JIM FARR 

24 / F. L. WRIGHT 

25 / MERRILL BROWN 

26 / STEVE SOBIERALSKE 

27 / GLEN LEROY 

28 / KNOX TIMLIN- 
STUCK 1> ELEVATOR: 
ELIZABETH ACOSTA 
BETSY BALDRIDGE 
MARY CINNINGHAM 
DEAN JOHNSON 
CHARLTON JONES 
MIRIAM LEMANN 
JERRY LEMANN 
SALLY NETTLETON 
HARRIET SEIDLER 
ROBERT TOM 

ERIC VAN REED 
KAREN WIZMA 



/ PAGE 7 



Second Year 



1 / GILL JAFFE 

2 / THOM JEIVKS 

3 / TIM FRECH 

4 / FRANK RIEPE 

5 / SUE VAN HART 

6 / LEO WIZNITZER 

7 / TERESITA CASTELLANOS 

8 / HARRY B. SMITH 

9 / LARRY HESDORFFER 

10 / MIKE HOWARD 

11 / CHRIS BENTON 

12 / CLAUDE BEAUDREAULT 

13 / JOHN BRADLEY 

14 / STEVE ROBBINS 

15 / SONNY SHIELDS 

16 / J. AUSTIN 

17 / CAL JONES 

18 / MARTY CYBUL 

19 / PETE SMITH 

20 / CARLOS CESPEDES 

21 / CHARLES MONTGOMERY 

22 / FRANK MASSON 

23 / MIKE STEIN 

24 / STEVE KITKO 

25 / JAMES REINHART 





26 / CLIFF ROSS 

27 / MARK MILLER 

28 / CHUCK MCKIRAHAN 

29 / MARK BADGER 

30 / AL MARTINEZ 

31 / JAMES CRAWFORD 

32 / FRISCO X. ALECHA 

33 / TOM PORTER 

34 / THORN GRAFTON 

AT THE ZOO: 
ALICE EICHOLD 
SARA HILL 
PAT LAREDO 
RICHARD MASON 
TANNAZ NIZPOUR 
EUGENE OGOZALEK 
BOB TURNER 



PAGE 8 / Architecture Undergraduates 



FinsT Yeah 



1 / MARK SPELLMAN 

2 /THOMAS SAINDEKS 

3 / «:nius young 

4 / Ol It LOCAL FKIEND 

5 / DAVID «;kant 

6 / HANK LONG 

7 / NICK POWELL 

8 / PHILIP DREY 

9 / CHICK AVEHBACH 
10 / DENNIS I>RE<;0 

I 1 / JANINE COLLINS 

12 / JOHN Ronit 

13 / PETER SniPSON 

14 / ROBERT OLIVIER 

15 / CARL VIAGILL 

16 / ALEX ALKIRE 

17 / PETE BARICEV 

18 / MARSHA BROWN 

19 /.IE AN DE BARBIERIS 

20 / BOB STRIIMM 

21 / R. C. SMITH 

22 / CHARLES SPANSEL 

23 / DENISE MICHELET 

24 / DWIGHT THEALL 

25 / STEVE TOl'SEY 

26 / :M0N TY SMITH 

27 / MICHAEL RICHARDSON 

28 / JOSEPH DAVIS 

29 / ARTHl R PEDLEZ 

30 / ROBERT RICHEY 

31 / CRICKET MOORE 

32 / ROLAND FANGUE 

33 / SERENA RANDOLPH 

34 / ROBERT SCHOEN 

35 / STEVE JOHNSON 




1 28 I 29 \30 ) 31 Viz 


73 3(34 L 


V-, 


1 


('~nV \ j / \ ^ 


r~0 / U'* } / 


<^\(yY 


vXr^ 


^-fiWM^^ 


"^^ H 1 


LH 


Mr")). 


I V 


^\ 


\ ts V, /I J( 


s ^ \ 




> r1 ^ k 



OIT TO LUNCH: 
GENE BATES 
TONY BILTMAN 
KENNETH Bl RNS 
MIGIEL CARLO-COLON 
CLYDE CARROLL 
ROBERT CHAPMAN 
LAWRENCE COMISKEY 
JOHN DABNEY 

ROSS DOW mm; 

PAl 1. Dl PRIE 
lERHY KVBER 
PATRICIA FISHER 
DANIEL HALL 
TIIO-XIAS H VYDEN 
DON \I.I) HOMINGS 
SI SAN lion ION 
KENT JOHNSON 

LA^^R^:M K J(>sephson 
ciRi jorc;ens 

ANTONIO LI CAS 
ROBERT -Mi KENNON 

Rolu i<r MONs Mtn vi 

HE< roR N VD\L 
I \l RIK PETIPVS 
PEI'EH S( IIMIDT 
JOHN rVMPMN 
sIMHOS VAMVAS 
(.ERAI.D WA«;N0N 
JERRY WITHERS 
WII I I VM >\ UK. Ill' 



DAVID ABERCROMBIE 

CHUCK AtLEN 

MARTOEL ALLEN 

RICHARD K. ANDERSSEN, JR. 



SAMUEL HENRY ANDREWS 

LINDA ARONSON 

MARILYN ASHER 

JOHN AUDICK 



CECILIA AUSTIN 

JOSEPH BAGGETT 

EMAY BUCHANAN BAIRD 

VICTOR J. BARBIERI 



ROBERT B. BARBOR 

JONATHAN S. BARNETT 

STEWART R. BARNETT, HI 

THOMAS BARTON 

JEFFRY A. BASEN 

BRIAN BASH 



BERYL BECKER 

MARCIA BENNETT 

GREGORY E. BERTUCCI 

RONALD S. BERTUCCI 

DON BLACKARD 

ALEXANDER H. BLUESTONE, JR. 



LES BOCKOW 
OFELIA CRISTINA BOGRAN 

DAVID CORIELL BOOTH 
C. DE FOREST BOUDREAUX 
RALPH STEWART BOWDEN 

BARRY HOWARD BRAUN 



STEVE BOYD 

BONNIE BRODY 

CORMETT R. BROOKS 

PUDDIN BROWN 

CHARLES W. BROWN 

JOSEPH R. BROWN, JR. 



R. LEONARD BROWN, JR. 

JOSEPH BRUCE 

LILLIE BRUM 

ANDREA BUCARO 

ILENE BUCHALTER 

BRUCE A. BURGA 





^ 





PAGE 10 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors 




1)1 VNK HI H.NSIDE 
LINDA f;. CAIIAI- 

cordon ransdell cain 

«:athy cai-Isch 

.JOHN PAi I. c;ampbeli.. hi 

< I.Al DKITe' CAMPBELL 



DAVID B. CAMPBELL 
RI< IIAKD A. f:ANTOR 
JOHN E. CAREY 
H. PHILLIP CARNES 
MARKIE C:aRRELL 
SHARON CARRIGAN 



ELLEN CARTER 
SHELLEY CITRON 
SUSAN CLADE 
PEACHY CLARK 
CLAfDE CLAYTON, JR. 
CRvVWFORD CLEVELAND 



Hti li 'f n 









BILLY F. CLINCON 
JOAN CLONINCER 
ROBERT COIVILLON 



BRLCE CRAIG 
PALL EDWARD CROW- 
MARY MARTHA CVRD 



STEPHEN C. CIRTIS 
JAMES G. DALFERES 
DALE DANE 



ROBERT t . DART 
CECILIA C. DARTEZ 
SONDRV DAIM 
CWEN DAVIDSON 
KENNY DAVIS 
MARK S. DAVIS 



HECTOR DEL CASTILLO 
SIZANNE M. DEL MARMOL 
GERALDINE S. DE LONG 
SANDRA L. DENARI 
CHARLES E. DK. WITT. JR. 
RICHARD DOBKIN 



/ PAGE 11 



SHELLEY DORFMAN 

JOHN CLAY DORRIS 

JIMMIE DRESNICK 

GEORGE BRYAN DUCK 

KENNETH DUCOTE 

PRISCILLA DUNN 



W. CLARK DURANT, III 

DONNA JEAN DYKES 

JEAN B. EAGAN 

TERENCE D. EDWARDS 

RICHARD EICHENHOLZ 

JAMES S. ELLIOTT, JR. 



GENE ELLIS 

RANDALL C. ELLZEY 

CHRIS EVAJNS 

MARY FABRE 

DAVID M. FAJGENBAUM 

STEVEN B. FEDER 



STEVEN FELSENTHAL 

MARTIN FENSTERSHEIB 

THOMAS N. FIDDLER 

ELLEN FINLEY 

LORI FINN 

LOXLEY FITZPATRICK 



SUSAN FLAMM 

SHERRY FLASHMAN 

MARY FRANCES FONTE 



ELIZABETH WILL FOUTS 

PHILIP L. FRANK, JR." 

KATHERINE ERASER 



CLAY B. FREDERICK 

CAROL FREEMAN 

LOUIE D. FREEMAN 



PATRICIA FRIELDER 

CHRISTOPHER BURKE FRUGE 

JIM GARTS 




PAGE 12 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors 




■v»u ii\Ki. (;f.krke.n 

MHIN (.11.1. 
It Mill VH A (.INSni RG 
M Al(^ ANN <.I.L<.K 
ll\l(IIV GOLDSMITH 

Kt N Ml 11 ri. (.()[ lis I y [N 



JANirE I.. MARIA GONZALES 

LINDA «. ON/, A IKS 

HOIIKKI f . «.<MH)\VIN 

ULn V GORDON 

PEGGY F. i.ORDON 

RAY f;ORDON 



II \RVEY GROSSMAN 
JAY GRIBER 



WALTER GRLNDY 
EDWARD GSCHWENDER 



GORDON GSELL. JR. 
MARTIN RICH.ARD H.AASE 
GWENDOLYN C. HAGER 
JOHN HALEY 
BARBARA B. HALL 
LISA HALL 



MEREDITH A. HARPER 
NANCY HARRIS 
VIRGINIA HARRIS 
SANDRA S. HARTLEY 
STEPHANIE HAYNES 
ELISE C. HAYS 



A. CHRIS HEINRICHS 

NED HEMARD 

JOEL HENDERSON 

JEAN BARTON HENRUKSON 

MIKE HENRY 

JANET HETHERWICK 



DAI F R. H!I nING 

DEIHDKV mil 

NAN! Y «.OLDSTKIN HOFFMAN 

PHILLIP H. HOFFMAN 

CAROLYN HOLDEN 

RICHARD r. HOOVER, HI 



/ PAGE 13 



PATRICIA LOUISE HOPKINS 

MARK R. HOROWITZ 

TOM IRELAND 

ROBERT IRVINE 

SHELLY ITELD 

JOAN L. JACKSON 



MARY ELIZABETH JACKSON 

SARALYN JACOBSON 

HARRY JOE 

GREGG JOHNSON 

KAREN GAIL JOHNSON 

BRUCE S. JOHNSON 







STELLA A. JONES 

MARCIA LEE JORDAN 

KIM JOVANOVICH 

RONALD KAPLAN 

DENNIS KASIMIAN 

MARY KAY 



SAM KAYSEN 

CHARLES F. KELLEY, JR. 

THOMAS N. KENNEDY 

MICHAEL J. KHOURI 

LANA KILLGORE 

BARNEY KING 



RICARD KINGREA 

JOHN C. KIRCHNER 

RICKEY C. KIRKPATRICK 

MANUEL L. KNIGHT 

PEGGY ANN KOVEN 

KAY KRAFT 



STEVE KRAMER 

MONTY KRIEGER 

ALAN D. LAFF 

CATHY LAMPARD 

TUPPER LAMPTON 

ANTHONY V. LA NASA 






m 



t 



'% 



:- .-> 




i^ili 



^ 





m. ^"*- / 







PAGE 14 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors 



f) A f^ 





ELRCIA C. LAND, JR. 
LUCY LANE 
LEE LATIMER 
EDWARD LE BRETON 
BRLCE F. LEE 
ROBERT LEE 



RICHARD H. LELCHUK 
TERRANCE J. LESTELLE 
RICARD D. LESTER 
JAMES LELNC 
ROBERT N. LEVINSON 
GARY ■MORTON LEVISON 



CLIFFORD J. LE\'Y' 
LESLIE ALL LEWIS 
RANDOLPH G. LEWIS 
LORAINE A. LOCKWOOD 
DALE C. LONG 
PETER A. LOPEZ 



ALBERT S. LOW, JR. 
SALLIE LOWENSTEIN 
STEPHEN P. LIKIN 
MICHAEL H. LLTZ 
WILLIAM B. MABRY 
MICHAEL MACWILLIAMS 



MICHAEL L. MAGEE 
LAUREL L. MALOWNEY' 
IRW^N MANDELKERN 
KAREN MANEMANN 
SANDRA MANSOm 
ROBERT L. MARCUS 



LEON E. MARTINY 
MARY MATHEWS 
MARYANNE MC ALPIN 
JOHN C. MC CARRON, JR, 



MARY J. MC CLINTOCK 
ED MC CORD 
GEORGE F. MC COWIN 
LEO MC KENNA 



MARY MC KINNEY 
EUGENE B. MC LEOD. JR. 
JAMES R. MC NEAL 
DAML MERDES 



/ PAGE 15 



MARY MEREDITH 

JILL J. MEYERS 

MARGARET MILLER 

PATRICIA MILLER 

STEPHEN A. MOGABGAB 

PATRICIA ELSE MONACO 



FRANCIS M. MOORE 

RON MOORE 

MARGO C. MORET 

EILEEN DWYER MORRIS 

MARCIA G, MORTENSEN 

EDWARD J. MOSKOWITZ 



MELINDA MOSS 
PHYLLIS MURPHY 
GEORGE MUSHKIN 



MARGARET N. MUSSER 

JOHN C. MUTZIGER 

FRED B. NEGEM 



JULIE ANN NGUYEN 

ANDREW G. NICHOLS 

ELAINE NODEN 



WALTER NORTON 

ELLIOTT NOVY 

PHYLLIS NUGENT 

ILEANA OROZA 

CHERYL A. PALERMO 

RUSSELL PALMER 



MURIEL S. PALMGREN 

ARTHUR F. PAULINA, JR. 

JOHN R. PEMBERTON 

SUSAN POLACK 

H. LOUISE PORZIG 

JAMES P. PRICE 



PATRICIA E. PRINS 

DANIEL E. RASKIN 

CHARLES H. REDMOND, II 

PAM REICH 

A. L. RICE, in 

EDWARD C. RICHARD 





%J^/' 




^^[ 





PAGE 16 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors 





i^M 



FAV AYfeX K RIDDLE 
<;HK<,0H\ p. ItlDt.NOLR 
XHIA KII.EV 
A.N.NK HISER 
LEWIS S. ROACH 
E. HOBERSON 



WILLLIAM A. ROBINSON 
KATHLEEN L. ROi.GE 
E. < VTHERINE ROSE 
LOUS HOVELLI 
CHARLES S. RIARK. JR. 
RORERT RIDERMW 



CLIFFORD NEIL SACINOR 
JOHN SALSTONE 
FERNANDO SANCHEZ 
K. DICK SANDERSON 



MIKE SANFORD 
SAM SCELFO 
JAY SCHILLER 
TERRY SCHREIER 



NANCY- JO SCHWARTZ 
SHELLEY A. SCOTT 
JOH. W. SE,VRCY 
RAYMOND C. SECHERS 



THOMAS SENETTE 
PAMELA JANE SHAW 
STEVE E. SHAW 
DONNA SHERH)CK 
H. EDWARD SHERMAN 
MARIVN SHOSTROM 



CYNDI SHOSS 
JERRY E. SIMS 
TAMARA SINDLER 
BETH SINGLETON 
RANDLOW SMITH, JR. 
ROSE SMITH 



SHVRMAN S-MITH 
STl \RT S'^lll s 
VI \ I> H. >(>! OMON 
DON \l.D .). SOMMERS 
W\1.TER SOMMERS 
V\ VN It. s(1l I y. IR. 



/ PAGE 17 



CHARLES L. SPENCER 

STEVE SPOMER 

LOUIS J. STANLEY 



DIANE STASSI 

WILLIAM D. STEGBAUER 

PEGGY STEINE 



CYNTHIA STEVENS 

RONNIE STEWART 

SUSAN STINE 



D. KIRK STIRTON 

MARK STOOPLER 

MELVIN V. STRAHAN 



TERENCE K. SULLIVAN 

JOHN R. SUTTER 

CAROLE SWANAY 

HAROLD SYLVESTER 

BETTY SUE TALBOT 

JAMES P. TATUM 



FRANK TEDARDS 
RICHARD TELLER 



KATHERINE TEMPLETON 
DOROTHY TOBY 



JUDSON E. TOMLIN, JR. 

SHELBY TOMLINSON 

JOSEPH F. TOOMY 

CRIS TRAXLER 

ANDREW M. TREICHLER 

LAURA TURNBULL 




PAGE 18 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Seniors 




STKPIIAME L. TWII.nECK 
IIHlMAS K. VAN IJt sKIItK 
SIKI'HKN A. VANN 
< AI«»LI>K VINCENT 
JOAN D. VI NOT 
ANNA WADE 



SI SAN ,1. W VDE 
RO<;En W \<,M VN 
SI SAN W\(,NKR 
JOSKI'H M. \V VI.KER 



VASCO WALTERS 
JACQl EI.YN K. WARR 
ROBERT H. WATSON 
STEPHERN B. WEBB, HI 



CRAIG WEIL 
RIKI WFINSTEIN 
RITH E. WEINSTEPS" 
ROBERT r. WESSLER 



DEBORAH WHALLEY 
CASSANDRV WHEELER 
DIEDRE P. WHITE 
MILDRED WIENER 
ALICE WILBERT 
A. SHERRY WILENSKY 



JOHN WILLIAMS 
JOHN S. WILLIAMS 
LINDV WILLIS 
TV^T VR \ WINTER 



CAROLYN S. WOOSLEY 
ERK WORRVLL 
C. K. H. WRI(;HT 
WILLIAM WRIGHT 



MARt.ARET YANIS 
STEPHEN ZAGOR 
SISAN ZELINGER 
CONSTANCE ZENDEL 
M^RTHV JVNK ZIMMERMAN 
ROBERT Zl RC HER 



/ PAGE 19 



4 



WILLIAM ABERMAN 
CONSTANCE V. ABRAHAM 



BILL ABRAMOWTTZ 
LAWRENCE M. ABRAMSON 



GALE ADAMS 

PATRICIA ADKINS 

BONNIE ADLER 

AL AGRICOLA 

STEPHEN AKIN 

CHRISTY ALLEN 



DANIEL ALLEN 

VAVANN B. ALLEN 

MICKEY ALLWEISS 

JORGE ALVAREZ 

THOMAS AMADIO 

JEFF C. ANDERSEN 



BEVERLY ANDERSON 

CRAIG ANDERSON 

DOUGLAS W. ANDERSON 

LAURA ANDERSON 

DENNIS M. ANGELICO 

JAY ANTIS 



TYLER APFFEL 

EDWARD B. ARCHBALD 

BILLIE ARMSTRONG 

NEIL ANN ARMSTRONG 

STEWART ARMSTRONG 

RONALD J. ARONOFF 



ELIZABETH P. ARONSON 

JO ARPIN 

STEPHANIE ARTHUR 

PAUL ARVITES 

MICHELE ASMUTH 

NEVAH ANN ASSANG 



RAY ATTANASIO 

YUK LUN AU 

TAYLOR AULTMAN 

GIL AUST 

ROBERT H. AUTENREITH 

JIMMY ALTIN 




n 



PAGE 20 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 








M Ml III \ A/AH 
< mils M. A/IIILL 
MIIIN .1. II\KIII(. Ill 
llfM(^ I. IIVIIK 
KOIIKKI II. II\II.KY 
\I.A> K, IIAIHD 



DIANK IIAI.KI.N 

< IIAKI.KS W. nAI.I. 

"NI \II(. \IIK I It M.IKNf.KH 

MI< II VKI. t . IIM lOiri 

slIKI.IV llVl.tll 

l>OI<.l.\s MIC IIKI. IIAKIiKR 



MAUI IN II\RI.s 
DALE BARKEN 
ItVRIlVHl IIVRNVRD 
l( VKII VH V II \ltNt s 
PMII.V I.. II VHVKs 
KEHHV A>> HAHNETT 



(.VII. l.'iNNK IiAK(JlL)I 
MINDY BARRAR 

nvwN nvRRios 

Win.! VM T. H VRRV 
JOHN BARTHELL 
K. B. BASTIAN 



I) Win A. BATEMAN 
DAMP BATT 
DAMD C. BAVMAN 



MKRHII I 11 VI M V> 
srE\ E II VI M VN 
CARLOS A. BAVMVXN 



k VHKN II VI M<. VKTF.N 
K VM>I II VI MM f IN 
,1 V>E HE V/.I.f/l 



Isk V < . BECK 

1. 1 HII VHI> UK KER 

I Iss V K. IlEKHs 

I IIOM vs IIHI.III KV 

KKMV llEll. 

(.EOEKREV r. UELLAH 



/ PACE 21 



DAVID P. BELLAMY 

CHRIS BELLARD 

BEV BENNETT 

LISA BENNETT 

KATIE BENTON 

STEVE BENZULY 



AL BERCER 

BARBARA BERGIER 

HOW^ARD C. BERMAN 

GARY BERNARD 

ROLAND LOUIS BERNELL 

SUE BERNIE 



MARILYN J. BERNSTEIN 

RICHARD BERNSTEIN 

ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN 

MELISSA BERNSTROM 

EARL BERTRAND 

FRANCES BETHEA 



JANE BETTS 

ROBERT F. BIGHAM 

MIKE BILLINGSLEY 

DONNA BILTON 

DOAK BISHOP 

TtD BISKEND 



BRUCE J. BIVONA 

ROBERT C. BLEDSOE 

JIM BLENDER 

CATHY BLEVINS 

EVA BLICKMAN 

SANDY BLUMENFIELD 







I^^HBP^ 





3t, ^ 



ANNE BODENHEIMER 

LUCILE BODENHEIMER 

BRUCE BOLYARD 



BETH BONART 

ALBERT S. BOND, II 

ROBERT M. BONO 



TONY BONO 

GLENN BOQUET 

BARRY S. BORDENAVE 

THOMAS BORNSTEIN 

JOSEPH BOUCHE 

ANN BOUDREAUX 




^ 




X .1 :. 





i 




1 

I 



t 



PAGE / 22 Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




ANN \ MMIIf IIOI Itl.KOIS 
J. \MI.I.I \M nut Hi 
KI.I/.AIIKIII ItO^KK 
PAT BOYLSTON 





i 


\ 




II Mill M( V nil Mil lll(l) 
IIHIIX.KI IlKMllft 
Mf I !«.>> \ 111! \MMKK 

^^ II I 1 \ M I . iin wdes 



NEAI IIHVVTLEV 

\NNK I I K iiHt \/y: \i r 

\MI,I I \M I. I11(K MIH.. JH. 
I'M I liltK.M \N 



NANf;^ T. BRES 
MARGARET BRETZ 
BRICK BRODNfiV 
STEVE BROOKsHER 
RI(H\RI) ItH()\Vl)\ 
BEN BIKJWN 



ELLEN BROWN 
H. WILLIAM BROWN 
MARTHA BROWN 
PAIL BROWN 
ROBERT DROWN 
RISSELL I.. BROWN 



SISAN BROWN 
SrSIE BROWN 
BEVERLY K. BRINSON 
BONNIE BRYAN 
KOHKRT I.. BH^ \N 
I'l I in l>. BR^ DEN 



ALOISE Bl CKLEY 
JEAN E. Bl KTrNER 
JOE BILL VRI) 
ELIZBETII Bl NTON 

1 I ll^ I) V. Bl R vs 

(111 KINE^ Bl RGE 



rt NM III RGHAl'SER 
.1 VNF 1 HI RNEV 
■M \U\l/\ N Bl RRl S 
\I \N Bl HTON 

ixn t.i vs ^I. innNFS 

N VM \ I . t VDK 



/ PACE 23 



JAMES CAIRE 

IRENE CALDWELL 

BARBARA CALI 

BETSY CAMPBELL 



MARTHA CAMPBELL 

DANIEL CAPLAN 

DAVID CAREY 

WILLIAM C. CARLIN, JR. 



PATRICIA CARLOCK 

GAYLE D. CARP 

MICHAEL CARRICO 

MARY CARRIGAN 



CAROL CASPAR 

DENISE CASSENS 

MICHAEL J. CASTEIX 

DEBORAH CAVANAUGH 



TONY O. CHAMPAGNE 

JANE CHAPMAN 

ROBERT CHAUVIN 

MISSY CHEESEMAN 

CAMILLE CHERBONNIER 

SONIA T. CHIAL 



MAURICE G. CHIDESTER 

ALFRED B. CHILDS, III 

WILLIAM P. CHISHOLM 

ROBERT B. CHOATE 

EMILE F. CHOPIN 

MICHAEL P. CHRISTIANSEN 



ERANKLIN CHU 

MAUREEN CLANCY 

DAVID F. CLAPP 

BILL CLARK 

CATHY CLARK 

JERRY CLARK 



STUART G. CLARK, IV 

EVELYN L. CLAUSNITZER 

PAT CLOSE 

LEONARD L. COHAN 

ALBERT COHEN 

CYNTHIA J. COHEN 




PAGE 24 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




GARY rOIIEN 
HOHKFn I.. <:f)HEN 
N \ TAI-IA rOKINOS 
JKANNE <:OLAIIAN 
< HARI.ES CULEE 
J K ANNE COLEMAN 



SA>DRA COLLIE 
M Mfi vrxniE rOLONEV 
IIAKIIAKA ((JMEAIX 
KAHE.N CONLEY 
srSAN J. fOOKE 
.JAME <:0()PKR 



JEKHtK^ It. ( OOPERMA.N 

1.(11 coors 

DKMSK COFM.ON 
I'EGCY COPI'ERSMITH 
MIKE rORNELILS 
BRICE ANN CORNELL 



THOMAS J. CORNELL 
ALBERT J. «:ORNinE 
SANDRA >I. CORRVO 
MARY MARGARET COIRT 
EMANIEL COIVILLON 
FRANK COYNE 



CARMEN CRAMER 
1> V> ID » K VND\LL 
M<»HHI> ( HISIKR 
HAl. 1 1U)( KKH 
TRl DY t Ht)M 
ALMA E. CIEHVO 



D V\ IK « I 1 \\ ELL 
VI I \ (I VMN(.lliM 
M \lt^ HI I II < I HTIN 
I) V\ ID D VI I V 
UK VDEOKI) DALLAS 
Sll IRON DALOVISIO 



/ PACE 25 



CATHY DALTON 

JACK DAMPF 

MOLLY DANIEL 

STEPHEN DANNER 

WILLIAM H. DAUME 

PATRICIA DAVENPORT 



ISABEL DAVIDSON 

SUSIE DAVIDSON 

MARIA J. DAVIS 

NUBBIN DAVIS 

SCOTT DAVIS 

MARY ANN DAY 



LEE A. DAYNE 

JOSEPH DE FR_4ITES 

LAN DE GENERES 

LAURA DEL PAPA 

ANN DE MONTLUZIN 

KYLE DENNIS 



ANDY DESALVO 

MARTIN DETTLEBACH 

TERRI DIAZ 

GINGER DICKEY 

BARBARA DICKSON 

DONNA DICKSON 



KEITH DIFFENDERFFER 

MARGIE DI JOHN 

ELIZABETH DILLON 



MARGARET L. DILLON 
JAMES DI RIENZO 
GLENN DISMUKES 



LISA DIXON 

WARD DIXON 

FREDERICK S. DOBARD, JR. 

WESLEY DOBBS 

STEVE DOBRINIC 

ERIC DOERRIES 



DAVID R. DOLKART 

MARTIN A. DONOVAN, III 

CATHERINE DORAN 

KATHERINE DORRIS 

SUSAN DORSEY 

MIMI DOSSETT 




PAGE 26 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




MAHIHA I)f)VF:R 
JKAN'MK IXJWI.IX, 
MICHAEL DOYLE 



I.F.K.II DH^KE 
.JA\ [ll(f>KI> 



TEDDY DRLSS 
lUCIIARD L. DLCOTE 

ciiiLDS E. Dr>n\n. in 



JII.I. Dl.NCAN 
RAY DINN, JR. 
JAMES DINMGAN 



COLEMAN DLPRE 
MILTO M. DLREAl, JR. 
DA.MELLE M. DITREY 
DEBORAH DITTON 
HOLLY EARL 
HAND! ECHOLS 



ALBERT F. EDWARDS 
JEFF EDWARDS 
MARGIE EDWARDS 
BENNY S. EICIIHOLZ 
nol <;i.AS ELHART 
kVIHY ELLIOTT 



KYI.F FLI.IS 
nvRIIVRA ELM\N 
VNGELI F. EL MERI 
PA»;E ELMORE 
N VI II VN R. EI.SON 

jFi F enc;el 



NOFI. KNCEMOEN 
FHON H. EPSTEIN 
UK II VIM) EPSTEIN 
rnllN H. FRNST 
M \H1 FNF FsKIM) 
FENN II. El 11 VNK> 



/ PACE 27 



FLORA EUSTIS 
MICHAEL E. EVANS 

PAULA EVANS 



NICHOLAS F. EWING 

BETH EXUM 

PHILIP A. FANT 



REID FARMER 

SIDNEY C. FARMER, III 

JANE M. FAULKNER 



GREGORY J. FAVRET 

CHARLES FECHTEL 

BRUCE FEINGERTS 

ROBERT FELL 

RONALD FELLMAN 

WILLIAM C. L. FENG 



JUDITH E. FERENCZY 

MARY FERRARA 

BARBARA FERTEL 

CHARLES FETZEK 

BRUCE FIERST 

LIZ FINK 



SUZANNE FIFE 

VANCENE FINK 

NATHAN FISCHMAN 

JOHN S. FITZGERALD 

MIMSY FITZPATRICK 

MARSHA FLANZ 



JEFF FLATER 

THOMAS FLETCHER 

DAVID FLOWERREE 

MARGARET E. FLYNN 

ANTHONY J. FONTANA 

JULIE ANN FORB 



BRUCE OMAR FORD 

DAN M. FORESTIERE 

STEPHEN FORRESTER 

PAULA S. FORWARD 

RICHARD FOUILLE, JR. 

FLORENCE FOWLKES 




PAGE 28 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 





RiniAItl) KRA>ro 
JA.NK I). F><\>K 
I' AM KHANK 
TIIOM A. KHANKLI.N 
rORIK FRANZ 
< . KirtK f RASKR 



KI(H\Rr> \. FR\SER. Ill 

HI I II f HA/.IOR 

» Ml V fREKDMW 

MM IIVKI. I.. FREEMAN 

PETER I). FREEMAN 

<;KFf;OHY I. FREIMKN 



SISAN FRERE 
KATHH^N FREY 
ROBERT « . FREV 
SISAN FREY 
MAX FRIDMAN 
ROM)V FRIEni. ^NDER 



ELLEN FRIEDMAN 
STEPHANIE FRIEFIELD 
SHELLEY FROCKT 
MARY E. FICET 
JAMES K. FILLER 
DE>rARClS CADDIS 



BETH CADDY 
DEBBIE CADDY 
R\NDI CALANTI 
Bl BBA CALLANDER 
SEAN CALVIN 
SCOTT CARDINER 



AMY CARDNER 
BECKY CARDNER 
WILLIAM T. CARLANT) 
<.WEN CARNER 
SANDRA CVRRiRD 
%VAYNE CVRRFTT 



VLVN RFID C\RTENHOrSE 

K \ltF\ (; VRTNFR 
IlRl ( K H. CAYNES 



< HVRLES CELLEH 
mniK *. CEOCHECAN 
DARYL CERBER 



/ PACE 29 



SHERYL E. CERBER 

FILLIS GERSGN 

GARY GERSON 

JOSEPH L. GETTYS, JR. 

PAM GIBBONS 

PAM GIBSON 



RILEY LEE GIBSON 

TIMOTHY C. GIBSON 

PETER R. GILLESPIE 

RICHARD P. GILMAN 

SCOTT K. GINSBURG 

DAVID GLADDEN 



MARCIA GLASS 

ROBERT GLASSER 

STEVEN M. GLAZER 

R. BRADLEY GLENDENING 

STEVEN L. GLICK 

MARK GLIMCHER 



STEVE GODWIN 

DENNIS GOERNER 

ELLEN GOLD 

LISA GOLDBERG 

WENDY GOLDBERG 

GRANT GOLDENSTAR 



MELVIN L. GOLDIN 

PAUL GOLDSMITH 

DEBBIE GOLDSTEIN 



ESTHER GOLDSTEIN 

JEROME ERIC GOLDSTEIN 

SANDRA GOLDSTEIN 



HAROLD T. GONZALES, JR. 

RANDY GONZALES 

GEORGIA A. GOODELL 



JAMES K. GOODLAD 

DAVID GOODMAN 

DEBORAH L. GOODMAN 










M^^i __\ 




PAGE 30 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




KOIIl.K I I.. (.(JOIlMA.N 

«»vu.>KY (;<><)i)Ki(:ii 

l)C»NN \ (,Ot SS 

UK II \riii \ I \ N i.oi'ss 

Mil II VKI. s. (.KADCS 
V \I<()N <.i<AT/. 



I)A\ 11) (.H VVK^ 

ttr.v.n onAVES 

Mf Ki f.nFKvnFnr. 

I(I( H Mtl) I . (.Hit I IN 

< MiiMiiNf «.nu US 

I.IMtV M. (.Hlf HTH 



HOItFRT D. GROSSMAN 
(ULCK GRLLL 



RON GCBA 

DENIS M. GtlLLOT 



PATRICK D. GlILLOT 
MARCIA GVMPERTZ 
JANE GVRTMAN 
JOHN C. GISTIN 
ANDREW CITERMAN 
LESTER GIT-M VN 



PHVI LIS GITTERMAN 
M ^H(.\RET H \( KLEY 
NAN( \ H \( KNK^ 
Vl( KIE HVDinNHORST 
CATHERINE HAGAMAN 

K \iin II VI ntiwKn 



ion HVLE 

M>|)U II VI.L 

imt s V H \I PIN 

I JU)M \> 11 VMIU RCER 

PAl L F. HANLON 

V7II I H VNSEN 



MI< H \EI P. HANTEL 

I iiin^ II vnniN 

J \>E H VRDER 
KENNETH HARMON 
M ^RK H\RNER 

JOSEPH M. TivnniNCTON 



/ PACE 31 



JAMES E. HARRIS 

KIM HARRIS 

ROSLYN HARRIS 

WANDA HARRIS 

WILLIAM R. HARRIS 

STEVEN HARTBERG 



JOHN W. HARTLEY 

RODNEY T. HARTMAN 

DEBRA E. HARTZMARK 

ELIZABETH HARVEY 

JAMES H. HARVEY, JR. 

JOHN HASPEL 



TOM HASTINGS 

JOCENTA L. HAWKINS 

MARK HAWKINS 



SUZANNE HAYDON 

KENNETH HAYES 

GEORGE ANN HAYNE 



CHRISTINA K. HEABERLIN 

DEBERAH ANN HEABERLIN 

KAREN HEAUSLER 

ROBERT F. HEBELER 

DAVID B. HEBERT 

KIRK J. HEBERT 



GLENN HEDGPETH 

ELLIE HELMAN 

GLENN S. HELTON 

AHMED M. HEMEIDA 

RICHARD HENDLER 

JOE HENDRIX 



MARION HENLEY 

JOHN RICHARD HENRY 

ADRIAAN R. J. HERKLOTS, H 

CAROL HERMAN 

GILBERT L. HERMAN 

JUDY HERMAN 



NICOLAS HERNANDEZ 

JAMES HERNQUIST 

ELIZABETH HEROD 

PATRICIA A. HERRING 

PATRICK HERRINGTON 

STEVEN HERRON 




PAGE 32 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




WAITER IIFIER 
LAI HIK IIKWIIT 

SISA> HKwn-r 

J«)H> A. HKYMAN 
IIAiniAII\ UK KrNGBOTTOM 
MK.IIAKL UK KOK 



VNVF. Hir.r.INS 
riNDV HK.MVS 
Willi \M I. HUBERT 
I)AHI.E>E HIIIIKKTH 
HRI<;E \. Hill. 
DOLGLAS W. HILL 



GEORGE D. HILL 
JEFFREY im I. 
WILLIAM W. IIINKHEY 
SrZA>NE IIIRSfH 
ERir A. HITCIirOCK 
PETER HITT 



MARILYN MODES 
PAM HOLBROOK 
MITCHELL H. HOLLEB 
DONAD HOLMES 
FLIP HOMANSKY 
CLIFFORD HORNBACK 



EMILIE C. HOWARD 
JIDY HOWARD 
MARD HOWARD 
EDDIE HOWELL 



SALLY HOWELL 
.JIIIVNNF III RER 
WILLIAM HIRER 
CHARLES HICKS 



W. CAMBELL Hn)SO>, III 
STEVE HIMCKE 
JAMES J. lURLEV 
PATRICIA HIRLEY 



JAMES M. in -Nl V> 
JOHN W. IIYSI av 
SISIE ILI.INGWORTH 
DAN IMMI>C 



/ P\GE 33 



DONAU) E. OIPSON 

DEBRA IXKLES 

ai. ISR-4EL 

SHARLENE J. JACKSON' 

GLENNA C. JACKSON 

HEATHER A. JACKSON 



JENNY JACKSON 

JLDI JACOBS 

LARRY JACOBS 

SIDNEY JACOBSON 

ANITA JARRETT 

JUDITH ELAINE JEE 



RONALD M. JEWELL 

JOSE L. JIMENEZ 

TOMAS JIMENEZ 

KATHERINE A. JOHNSON 

S.AR-4H JOHNSON 

WEBB JOHNSON 



FLELTl JOHNSON-MVLLER 

ERIC JONES 

GARY A. JONES 

HENRY B. JONES 

KAREN JONES 

IVnCHAEL JONES 



PAMELA JONES 

SAMLEL A. JONES 

STE-VEN JONES 

SUSAN' H. K_AHLMUS 

PAUL R. K.\HN 

ANDREW J. KALLOK 



RICH.ARD KANFER 

BARB.AEl.\ KAPLAN 

MICHAEL KAPLAN 

SH.ARI K-4PLAN 



ROSALYN K-4PLAN' 

MRTIN KASDAN 

JAMES KATULA 

EDDIE KATZ 



RICHARD KATZOFF 

SCOTT KAUFFMAN 

JAMES ROBERT KAY 

LILA KAY 




I 



PAGE 34 / .\rts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergr-aduates 




UK II \HI) I . KAV 

Ml< II VKI .1. KKEFFE 

<.K)H<,f. KLK.N 



DOROTHY KfENAN 
KIKT y. KKKSLER 
KAim KLI.M 



MERRILEE ANN KELL 
VAX V KER> 
RONALD J. KERR 



DAVID L. KERSHAW 
ROBERT KERSHAW 
CHARLES KESSLER 
BETSY KEYS 
BRYAN EARL KIEKE 
ERIC L. KIESEL 



JANICE KILLEBREW 
GINNY KIMZEY 
FRANK M. KINDER 
LtCIE M. KING 
RAYMOND KINNEY 
DEBBIE KIRSCHENFELD 



JACQIELINE KIRVEN 
ELIZABETH KLAFF 
KAREN KLEGER 
DEGRA LEE KLEIN 
JENNY KNAPP 
AMY SI E KNIGHT 



DAVID J. KNIGHT 
IIEDV I. KNOFF 
KVIHIFKN TVIFH KNOPH 
TONI KNORR 
SALLY KNOWLTAN 
JANE KOCHANSKI 



.1 VMFS Konv 
(.KOHGF KOHN 
ROSVIIK M. KOLB 
(.IIFGORV A. KOPP 
I> VNIEL H. KOREM 
WENDY KORNECAY 



^r«j 



/ PA«.E 35 



AMY R. KOTIC 

EVE KOVEN 

DAVID KRACHE 



LINDA KRAMER 

SUE KRANTZ 

THOMAS A. KREFFT 



ROBIN E. KRIEG 

SEVEN L. KRINGOLD 

GEORGE G. KUBACH 

ARTHUR F. KUEHN 

JAMES KUNTZELMAN 

MITCHELL KUSHNER 



MELANIE KUSIN 

MICHAEL JAY KUTTEN 

JIM KWIATKOWSKI 

J. SCOTT KYLE 

DAVID LA CLAIRE 

KENNY LA COUR 



PAUL LACROIX 

JONATHAN M. LAKE 

ANTHONY LAMEY 

STEPHEN LANDIS 

LYNN LANDRUM 

EDMUND C. LANDRY, JR. 



J. MICHAEL LANDRY 

NAN LANDRY 

KIM LANDSMAN 

LEE LANIER 

PAUL LASKY 

SUNIE LASKY 



MARK LASSITER 

SARAH T. LATHAM 

SHARON LAUFER 

KEITH E. LAURIE 

STEVEN LAUSELL 

KAREN LAUTZ 



STEVE LAVEN 

CAROL LAVIN 

JIM LAVIN 

JORGE LAW 

H. HILLIARD LAWLER, III 

ELIZABETH LAWLOR 




^■^^ "^T^ 






I 



PAGE 36 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




ROBERTA B. LAWRENCE 
STEWAKT LAWRENCE 
ALAN R. LAX 
LALRA LEACH 
GREG S. LEAF 
CHARLES LEANESS 



ELEANORE LEAVITT 
BRYAN P. LE BLANC 
StZANNE M. LE BLANC 
JAMES LEE 
BLAINE LEGLM 
LYNN LEHNHARDT 



PATRICIA LEIB 
ALICIA LEONARD 
STEPHEN LEPLEY 
SHELDON LERMAN 



CINDY' LESTER 
RICHARD LEVENSTEIN 
BARRY LEVINE 
STAFANIE LEMNSON 



ELYSSE LEvnrov 

DEBBIE LEVY 
ANN LEWIS 
BETH LEWIS 



DENNIS LEWKA 
RENEE LIEBER 
ELIZABETH J. LINDSAY 
VERNA LINDSAY- 



SARAH R. LINES 
CAROLYN LIPSON 
DEBORAH LIPSTATE 
CIRTIS LU 
CARY D. LIVINGSTON 
MICHAEL R. LOCKWOOD 



ALAN P. LOEB 
JA>1ES LOGAN 
HELEN LOKER 
JOANNA LOMBARD 
DANIEL A. LONG 
DEBIE LONG 



/ PAGE 37 



JOHN LEE LONG 

ROGER LONGBOTHAM 

ERIC LOWE 

RALPH MICHAEL LOWENBAUM 

KIT LOZES 

FRED LUERA 



MARLENE LURIE 

REIDY M. LUSTIG 

WILLIAM LYON 

LYNNE LYONS 

HARRY J. MACEY 

ELIZABETH MACKAY 



RICK MACKIE 

KIERAN MAGGARD 

GALVIN MAH 

PAUL MAIER 



CAROLYN MANN 

PEGGY MANNING 

RAY MANNING 

STEVEN J. MARCELLO 



NORMAN MARCUS 

JOHN W. MARKHAM 

GEORGE MARKS 

JIM MARKS 



ALICE MARQUEZ 

ELIZABETH MARSAL 

DAVID MARTIN 

FREDERICK W. MARTIN, III 



HOLLY S. MARTIN 

LYNNE MARTIN 

SANDY MARTIN 

BETH MARX 

JOEL D. MARX 

PHILIP E. MASQUELETTE 



PATSY MATHIEU 

DANIL MAUTHE 

BARBARA MAXWELL 

BETH L. MAXWELL 

CATHERINE MAYER 

JOYCE MAYERS 





^ 




i 
I 



PAGE 38 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




NANCY ANN MAZIR 
KATHERINE MC AKTHIH 
FIOSK A. Mr. CABE 

HosN.N.NA M«; <:affrey 

Mll.onV Mf; TALIP 
JAMES I.. MC CLLLOCH 



JOHN M<; CLTCHEN 
DANNY MC DAMEL 
WVRREN I.. MC FERRAN 
EI. K WOK II. MC fiAHEY 
CAROL MC CEEHAN 
DONALD MC GLY.NN 



MIKE MC GLIRE 
CARLCS MC INERNEY 
JOHN MC INTYRE 
MICHAEL MC INTYRE 
ROBERT MC KAY 
MICHAEL .MC KEEVER 



JAMES A. MC KEIVER 
JOHN MC LEOD 
JOAN -MC Ml LLEN 
JOHN MC >U RTREY 
ANTHONY MEADOW 
HLGH MEAGHER 



VINCENT T. MEIS 
JERRY MELTON 
ELAINE MENDEL 
MIMI >IETHVIN 
DOUG MEYER 
STEVE MEYER 



PAl LA MICHAEL 
ROBIN A. MICHAELS 
JO\N ^IICHELSON 
BETTY MILES 
BRIAN >IILLER 
MARGARET MILLER 



Ml SYDNEY R. MILLER 

MmiK MIIIOY 



K VREN MILZER 



/ PACE 39 



SARAH MINARD 

LOUIS MIRON 

CLARISSA MITCHELL 

DAVID MITCHELL 

TRACY MITCHELL 

BARRY MITTENTHAL 



DEBORAH MOBBERLY 

SUSANNA MOBLEY 

JUDITH ANNE MOFFITT 

PAM MONAST 

MONICA L. MONICA 

KENT W. MONIER 



BILL MONNET 

KATHE MOON 

RAYMOND E. MOON 

CHRISTOPHER G. MOORE 

REINALDO MORE 

GREG MOREY 



DEBBIE MORRIS 

JEFFERY B. MORRIS 

SCOTT MORRISON 

CHARLIE MOSS 

PAT MOSS 

JOSLYN MOUCH 



GORDON W. MOUGHON 

BONNIE CAROL MOULTON 

THOMAS MURDICK 

CAROLINE MULLEN 

ANN MULLER 

COLLEEN MUNDS 



JEANETTE MURDOCK 

FRANK MURPHY 

RANDY MUSE 

JANIS MYER 

ROBERT MYERS 

JACK NAFTEL 




ti 4 



PAGE 40 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 



I 




,11 VN I.. \ \M\ 
M MIK «. NKKUHAM 
I) VM» M. >KIL 
•ATHY NELSON 



GEORGE D. NELSON. .JH. 
VIRGINIA F. NELSON 
ALBERT V. NELTHROPP 
HARRIETT NETTLES 



nON NEWCOMB 

WILLI \M S. NEWSOM, III 

JILIANNK MCE 

SCOT! MfHOLAS 

HOOPER NICHOLS 

RONNIE NIERMAN 



SUSAN E. NILES 
SLELLEN NIXON 
MARILYN NOBILE 
GREGORY J. NOLAN 
JLLIE A. NORMAN- 
JIM NORRIS 



EDWARD NORVELL 
CHERYL D. NOVAK 
JOHN M. OBERG 
ANN H. o'BRIEN 
CHARLES o'BRIEN 
MARIA I. o'BYRNE 



john o hearn 
john c. oldfield 
<;erry o'leary 
peter m. oleck 
don \ld oliver 

DEBOR VH OLnXRA 



STLART L. OLNEY- 
PETER o'MALLEY 
KENNETH OPAT 
PAl L M. ORDOCNE 
CI RRIE OVERBY 
ROBERT \ OWEN 



TOM OWEN 
VNNK I.. PACKER 

M \n\ n. p vrKER 

ALLVN S. PADAWER 
CATHY PAINE 

JOSE PVNnv 



/ PAGE 41 



JAMES PANIPINTO 

CATHERINE S. PANNILL 

FRANCES PAPPAS 

MARIA A. PARADELO 

PAM PARDUE 

PAMELA C. PARKER 



ISABEL B. PARKS 

JANIE PARTIN 

SUZY PASCH 

L. CISSY PASS 

WILEY A. PATTERSON 

HELEN C. PATTISON 



WILLIAM T. PAULL, JR. 
PAUL W. PAUSTIAN, JR. 



ALBERT PAVY 
JOHN B. PAYNE 



SHARON PEARHNE 

CRAIG S. PEARLMAN 

ROBERT S. PEARSON 

STEVEN S. PEDEN 

CRAIG PEDERSEN 

JANE C. PEELER 





if' 


^Bjt 


LANDON C. PENN 




^' "^ 


READ PENSON 




WH -^ 


EDITH S. PEPPER 






LIZABETH PEPPO 






E. S. PERRETCK 




J^ 


LEILA PERRIN 







PAULA A. PERRONE 

GAIL PERRY 

L. DELIA PERRY 

JOANNE PESSA 

BARBARA A. PETERSON 

MARY M. PFLUMM 



MARY C. PHILIPS 

SIDNEY H. PHILLIPS, JR. 

ERAN PICKENS 

KEENAN PICKERT 

MILLIE PILIE 

MICHAEL PINNOLIS 



■i 




^ 


i 




1 


3. 


l^'a 


k 




PAGE 42 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 





( If 










3^ 



i^^ ^ 








.V a<-> 



I ItlstvN I'lNZON 

noimi I'iSAN 

IIAKIIMIA N. PISANKO 
ll\l(l(\I(\ PITTS 
KMIIKIIINK I'LAlCIli 
MAFtV PLALtHE 



« UIU^TOPUKR POLIZZI 
DKIIOKAIi POLLACK 
MKVK POLLARD 
>Vn.I.IAM n. POPE 
( I.Ari)L\ POTTS 
THOMAS POUNDS, JR. 



<.>iK(; powF.i.i. 

.10 V\ POWKI.L 

M vm HELEN POWELL 

KICKY POWELL 

EI>I>IE PRATT 

«;aIL PRATT 



KENT S. PRATT 
WILLLVM H. PRATT 
MONTY PREISER 
PATRICIA C. PRESCOTT 
CLAIDI PRICE 
NED PRICE 



jane pritchard 
:marcia prosser 
a. pall protos 

BOBBIE PROVOSTi' 



PATRICIA PRIETT 
ANN QIVVE 
■VI VI KEEN (11 EBEDAU 
M AKK W. yiH;LEV 



PVTKICK J. QIINLIVAN 
M VH^ KADFORD 
KI( II Vltl) RAFES 
KKNEK KVFFALOVICH 



STEPHANIE RAGLAND 
< \llKOLL n. RALEY 
I \l <,)l F R WIEY 
JOHN HA-VIIREZ 



/ PAGE 43 



ELAINE RAPHAEL 

JEFF RAPOPORT 

STEVE RAPPEPORT 

ROBERT RASKIN 

LINDA RASPOLICH 

RICHARD K. RATHBUN 



AIDA RAVERTA 

BECKY RAY 

DAN RAYMOND 

RANDY READ 

ANNE REARDON 

DEIBY O. REELE 



BARBARA REGENSTEIN 

W. H. REINBOLD 

JOHN REINSCH 

HOWARD REISMAN 

JEROME REPHAN 

IRVEN RESNICK 



PATRICIA RICH 

PATRICIA RICHARD 

CATHERINE RICHARDSON 

DEBORAH A. RICHARDSON 

ARNOLD RICHER 

JERRY RICHMAN 



SARAH I. RICHTER 

MARY RICKARD 

JOHN RIGNEY 

DEBORAH J. ROBERTSON 

DANA ROBINSON 

NEIL H. ROBINSON 



GREGG ROCK 

CAMILLE A. ROGERS 

LOUISA ROGERS 

JOHN L. ROKOVICH 



MARLEEN S. ROOSTH 

GAY ROPER 

SHARON ROSE 

CATHERINE ROSEN 




J^jgj^ ' ' r-*>- 







PETER ROSENBAUM 

ELLEN ROSENBLOOM 

HENRY B. ROSENTHAL 

GARY ROSMARIN 




PAGE 44 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




STKVE ROSNER 

C AM>V HOS!i 

KAIUAHINK ROSS 

C.K.N KKN <:. ROTH 

SrSA.V ROZANSKI 

JODY ALAN HLbE.NSTEIN 



JEFFREY RIBI.N 
SANDRA Rl KIN 
BEMTA Rl BINETT 
EILEEN Rl BMTZ 
MirilAEI. H. HLDEEN 
ANN RLDOLPH 



PETER A. RIST 
JOHN G. RUTH 
DIAN L. RYAN 
JOHN F. RYAN 
RANDY RYAN 
JAMES SAADI 



DEBORAH A. SABALOT 
MELAME SALE 
THOMAS SALYER 
SUE SALZ 



PATRICIA SAMMONS 
KAY SAMPSON" 
MAUREEN SAMUELS 
STEPHEN" SAMUELS 



VICKI SAMUELS 
SCOTT SAMUELSON" 
ANA MARIA SANCHEZ 
ROBIN K. SANDACE 
MARTHA SANDERS 
BRUCE SANDERSON" 



DIANE SANDERSON 
CHRISTINE M. SANTHIN 
JAMES D. SATROM 
JACK SAUL 
LINDA J. SAUL 
ANN SAVAGE 



PHILIP A. SAVOIE 
SALLIE A. SCAN LAN 
JOHN SCARPINATO 
MITCHELL SCHACK 
FREDERICK SCHATTMAN 
CATHY SCHATZ 



/ PAGE 45 



PETER SCHAUMBERG 

SAMMIE SCHENKER 

MITCHELL SCHER 

HAROLD SCHERR 

BOR SCHIESS 

STEVEN SCHIFF 



FREDRIC C. SCHLESINGER 

KATHERINE SCHNEIDAU 

DAVID SCHIVELL 

MARY ELLEN SCHOENBERGER 

STEVEN H. SCHOENBERGER 

KENNETH SCHUBB 



LITT SCHULINGKAMP 

MARTHA SCHULL 

MARTIN A. SCHULTZ 

STEPHEN SCHULZ 

J. STEPHEN SCHUSTER 

PAT SCHUSTER 



S. SCOTT SCHWAB 

JULIE SCHW^AM 

MAURI SCHWARTZ 

PHILLIP H. SCHWARTZ 

LYNNE SCHWOTZER 

MARY LOIS SCOFIELD 



ISABEL S. SCOTT 

ROSALYN ANITA SCOTT 

CYNTHIA SEALE 

MELVIN SEARS 

SAMUEL I. SEHNERT 

ALLAN SEIBEL 



RICHARD A. SELAKOVICH 

MARTHA SELLERS 

CAROL SELONICK 

ANDI SERVOS 

DEBORAH SHACKLETON 

SARA SHACKLETON 



LAWRENCE B. SHAFFER, III 

MARY JO SHAFFER 

JAN SHANHOUSE 

STEPHEN SHANKS 

RUTH SHAPIRO 

DONALD SHARP 



DICK SHARPSTEIN 

BEN SHAW 

CLAUDE SHAW 

JOSEPH L. SHEA 

JIMMY SHEATS 

STEVEN SHELLEY 




PAGE 46 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




LEOPOLD SHER 
SIIAHT SIIERiriAN 
I. \l HKI. SIIKKMA> 
IlKIIIlIK Mlf.KKII.L 
VI( lOHIA SIIKKUOL'SE 
KENNETH SHINBAL'M 







.lElNETTE n. sHIPMAN 
■VIARV SII.VEHMAN 
HDIJERT SIMEONE 
VMTA SIMMONS 
<.V\ SI'M'MONS 
KONA l>. SIMMONS 



/ pm;F 4-7 



STEVE SIMONE 

SUSAN A. SIMONTON 

MICHAEL T. SIMPSON 

SALLY SIMPSON 

BRENDA SIMS 

LAWRENCE J. SINDEL 



GLENN SINGER 

CAROL SIR 

TIM SLAUGHTER 

NANCY A. SLOAN 

SCOTT SLONIM 

JOSEPH M. SMAZAL 



ANDREW M, SMITH 

ARTHUR C. SMITH 

CARL M. SMITH 

DARNISE MARIE SMITH 

DIANE SMITH 

EUGENIA E. SMITH 



JAMES F. SMITH 

KATIE SMITH 

MARLIVE SMITH 

NANCY SMITH 

PAXTON J. SMITH 

ROBERT M. SMITH 



WILLIAM R. SMITH 

BETTY SMOLKIN 

HELEN E. SNEED 

MARILYN SNOOK 

ERNEST C. SNOW, JR. 

GLEN G. SOBEY 



SARAH JANE SOGIN 

DANIEL SOKOLOFF 

BETTY SOLNIK 

BARRY SOMERSTEIN 

JANICE SOMMERS 

DAVID C. SOROE 



JOEL SOROSKY 

KAREN I. SOTO 

MARY SCOT SPAAR 

JEFFERSON SPANN 

PETER SPANN 

GLENN SPEAR 



DON SPECK 

JOHN SPENCE 

RALPH SPINDOLA 

JOHN M. SPOTTSWOOD, JR. 

CAROL SQUARCY 

CHRIS STEED 











^ 


\ 






A 





mj m 


' — - 


^^V'^ 


_, 


^ ^ 


^. 


K" . 





PAGE 48 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




KO.^ALIE STLELE 

STANLEY H. STEIN 

A HUE STEI.M.E 

MIKE VIEHN 

PEr;(,V JEANNE STERNBERCER 

EMILY STEVENS 



ALICE STEVENSON 
BARBARA STEWART 
fllAHI.ES STEWART 
l*ATRI(.I\ STEWART 
IMUSriLLA STEWART 
JOAN STILLMAN 



LINDA STINNETT 
MARY LEE STINSON 
NANCY E. STOCKBRIDCE 
BEN STOKELEY 
CAROL RLTH STONE 
JIMMY STONE 



MARK STONECIPHER 
MARCO STOWERS 
ELLEN STRAVS 
RICK STREXFFER 
GARY STRELAL 
MARK STRIDER 



JIM STROHM 
SHEELAH STRONG 
JILL STIART 
ROBERTA STUART 



HARRY W. SlLLnAN, JR. 
RETT SlLLrVAN 
ERIC T. SWANSON 
RACHAEL SWEIG 



DEAN SWEITZER 
KARIN SWENSON 
JACK D. SWETLAND 
DE DE SWIFT 



ANNE TALBOT 
\RTni R TALLEY 
t AMPnEIl TALLY 
GRFC TVMBLYN 
ESTHER TVNNENBAIM 
LEON TARANTO 



/ P\CE 49 



GIN TAYtOR 

HUGH TAYLOR 

JANET TAYLOR 

SUZANNE E. TAYLOR 




BECKY TEETER 

CLIFFORD TEICH 

BILL TEMPLETON 

C. LAUCHLIN TENCH 



ROBB S. TENNANT 

TIMMY T. TERREBONNE 

CATHY TERRY 

SEAN TERRY 



RICHARD A. THALHEIM, JR. 

THOMAS R. THIBODEAUX 

DOUGLAS THIEL 

THOMAS M. THIELE 



STAN THOMAS 

HOLLY THOMISON 

JAMES E. THOMPSON 

KRISTINA THOMPSON 

DON THORNBERRY 

JAMES D. THRASHER 



ANDY TITEN 

PAM TITLE 

KATHRYN TOMBERLIN 

RONALD TOMPKINS 

LYNNE TORBERT 

ARLENE TORBIN 



WILLIAM I. TOUPS 

SUSAN TOTZKE 

CRAIG S. TRAMPIER 

WARREN E. TRASK 

MARY MARGARET TRAXLER 

STANLEY TREITLER 



ORRIN M. TROUM 

PETE TSCHUMI 

WILLIAM L. TUCKER 

BRENDA TUDOR 

LINDA TUERO 

NOREL TULLIER 







£ 




jK^ 4(rM 






^ 












K'' 





I 



PAGE 50 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




JOAN r. TLLLMAN 
HKHT TLRNER 
MARY A. TIRNER 
I'HII.IP TIRNKR 
MARTHA TIRRE.NTINE 
JANET LDE.N 



BRECK ULE 
MARV LMLAND 
DAVID INCER 
ANNE VADEN 
Jf)E \ AMGORSKY 
LLtlE VAN METER 



TAMARA VANNOY 
MICHAEL VARCON 
K. NEIL VAICHAN 
VIRGIL C. VALGHAN 
LESLIE VENNERS 
STEVE G. VENTLRATOS 



GLESE ANN VERLANDER 

WAYNE VIAL 

MARY MARGARET VIATOR 

STEPHEN C. VOSS 

STEVE WADE 

THOMAS D. WADE 



GEORGE WAGNER 
J. MARK WAGNER 
MARTIN WAGNER 
WADE WAGISEPACK 
CHARLES R. WALDRON 
CONNIE WALKER 



ERIC WALLACE 

J (IF WALLACE 

M\RV ELLEN WALLACE 

J \NET WALLER 

SANDRA WALLICK 

WENDY WALLNER 



/ PAGE 51 






MAUREEN WALSH 

VANNA WARMACK 

WILLIAM P. WATSON 

PENN WAUGH 

JULIA J. WEBB 

BETH WEBER 



JOHN WEBRE 

WILLIAM H. WEBSTER 

STEVE WEHRLE 

PAUL WEIDENFELD 

ALICE WEIL 

KENNETH C. WEIL 



JAMES WEINACKER 

GUY L. WEINBERG 

BARRY WEINER 

MICHAEL WEINSTOCK 

ANN WEISLER 

GARY WEISS 



BONNIE WEITZENKORN 

GORDON WELLER 

JOHN S. WELLES 

ANDREW WELLS 

BRUCE WELLS 

JOY WELLS 



SAYRA WELLS 

CONNIE WERNER 

MELINDA WEST 



MARINA Y. WESTERSTROM 

JUDY WESTON 

ELIZABETH WETZEL 



PAULA S. WEXLER 

SUSAN WEXLER 

RONALD WHEAT 

JEDDA WHITE 

ANNE WHITED 

LOYD WHITLEY 



lONE WHITLOCK 

BECKY WHITTEN 

KENDRICK O. WHITTINGTON 

DOUGLAS M. WIEDER 

HEATHER WIGGINS 

ROBERT V. WIGGINS 




PAGE 52 / Arts & Sciences and Newcomb Undergraduates 




A LAN P. K. WILD 
A.NDV WII.K 
A.NC;ELA WILKES 
LEE T. WILKERSON 
l(I( HARD WILKOF 
UAMU M. WILLIAMS 



DEBBIK WILLIAMS 
IRVI> J. WILLIAMS 
LIZ WILLIAMS 



GEORGE T. WILLIAMSON 
NANCY SCOTT WILLIAMSON 
CLARENCE L. WILLIS. Ill 



THEON WILSON 
DIANE WINGO 
BARRY WINN 



DIANA WINOKER 

KEITH M. WTSM.\R 

BRIAN S. WTTKOV 

LOLTSE WOLF 

RITA WOLFF 

MARY FREIDA WOLFSON 



JOAN WOLKIN 
DAVIS WOODS 
BRANDON WOOL 



LIZA WRIGHT 
RICHARD W1-DE 
MARC YELLIN 



JOANNE YIANILOS 
MKI YIAMLOS 
SYLVIA J. YOING 
MATTHEW ZALE 
CHARLEY ZEANAH 
KATHIMARIE ZEMANN 



M>RA ZILAHY 
RANDAL ZIPSER 
SHKRRY ZOX 
MINTA S. ZILKEY 
WAYNE ZWICK 
MIKE D. ZYGMINT 



/ PAGE 53 



GARY LEE ADAMS/ UNIV. OF YORK 

LINDA J. ALTENBERG/ UNIV. OF PARIS 

GARY E. BAIR/ UNIV. OF HULL 

RHONDA J. BALDINGER/ UNIV. OF SOUTHHAMPTON 



GARY M. banks/ QUEEN MARY COL. 

EDWARD R. HERMAN/ UNIV. COL. LONDON 

ARTHUR S. BERNSTEIN/ BEDFORD COL. 

LEE K. BOOCKER/ LONDON SCHOOL OF ECON. & POL. SC. 



WILLIAM D. BRIZZEE/UNIV. OF HAMBURG 
DEBRA KAYE BROWN/ UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL 



MICHAEL F. BRUTON/UNIV. OF GLASGOW 
JANICE L. BUCHSTANE/ UNIV. OF PARIS 



DON A. BUKSTEIN/uNIV. OF SHEFFIELD 
THOMAS H. BURGUIERES/uNIV. COL. LONDON 



MARY SUE CAMPBELL/uNIV. OF LIVERPOOL 
DENIS A. CLEGG/UNIV. OF BIRMINGHAM 




PAGE 54 / A. & S., Engineering, and Newcomb J.Y.A. Undergraduates 



^ik 




I.INDA K. fOFFFH/lMV. f)F PAFUS 

.ia<;k k. coiien/ iMv. <»j heading 

DIANA SUE COPEI-ANo/yiEEN MARY COL. 
JAMES M. CITSHAW/lMV. fOI.. LONDON 



DONNA A. DALFEHES/l NIV. OF MADRID 
CARLOS DE LA VEGa/lNIV. OF PARIS 
ETTA JANE DOVITH/iMV. OF MANCHESTER 
JOAN SYDNEY ENGLAND/ L NIV. OF MADRID 



GAIL FEINBERC/lNIV. OF BRISTOL 

MICHAEL F. FINK/i NIV. OF BRISTOL 

STEVEN M. FISCHER/ IMV. OF MANCHESTER 

ARTHUR G. GRIMSAL/WALES & MONMOITHSHIRF ' VRDIFF 



EDMUND S. cross/ UNIV. COL. OF WALES ABERYSWYTH 
KENNETH W. HVGAN/iMV. OF H VMBURG 
DEBORAH A. II\WKI>s/lMV. OF T VRIS 
BARBARA JO HEI>l/lNIV. OF >.HEFFIELD 



^Ji\h 



KAREN M. heller/ INIV. OF P \RIS 

WIIIIVAT M. nFMETFn/lNn. OK SOI THH\MPTON 

JON. K. H<Htlls/lM\. OK inKKI'MOI 

<.FK\III II. JOHNSON/ I MN. COI . OF SWANSEA 



PACE 33 



SHIRLEY C. KIRKCONNELL/UIVIV. OF BIRMINGHAM 

DAVID H. KLINGENSMITH/uNIV. OF PARIS 

ERLING LARSON, IIl/UNIV. COL. OF NORTH WALES, BANGOR 

JAMES W. LEATHERMAN/UNIV. OF ABERDEEN 



JAMES A. LINDERMAN/uNIV. COL. OF SWANSEA 

SCOTT G. MARKOFF/uNIV. OF PARIS 

BRIAN J. MARKS/UNIV. OF EAST ANGLIA 

TIMOTHY A. MARKUS/UNIV. OF PARIS 




JAMES M. MCCREADY/UNIV. OF PARIS 



WILLIAM F. MCDONNELL/ UNIV. OF SUSSEX 



PAULA JEAN MCKENZIE/ IMPERIAL COL. 



MICHELE AMME METZ/uNIV. of PARIS 



JOE elkins moore/westfield col. 

PHYLLIS M. POTTERFIELD/UNIV. OF NOTTINGHAM 
FRED D. prentice/ UNIV. OF HULL 
JOHN W. RANKIN/ UNIV. OF LEEDS 



KALMON M. RENOV/UNIV. OF READING 

MARK E. REYNOLDS/ UNIV. OF WARWICK 

RALPH Z. RICHARD/ UNIV. OF EDINBURGH 

JEAN E. RIOPELLE/ UNIV. OF PARIS 




PAGE / 56 A. & S., Engineering, and Newcomb J.Y.A. Undergraduates 




/ 1 

' f 

f <;i.KN.N I. HONES/UNIV. OK KDINIil R(;|I 



CATII^ SUE SALIMAN/i M\. OI I'VIIIS 



ROBIN C. SILVER/l'MV. OF MADRID 



KATHY S. SLOCOMBE/LMV. OF ST. ANDREWS 
DAVID A. SLOSKY/lMV. OF LEEDS 
EDRIE B. SOWELL/uNIV. OF PARIS 
JANIE M. stone/ tNTV. OF PARIS 



BARBARA LYNN VAN EATON'/ LONDON SCHOOL OF ECON. & 

POL. SC. 

MICHAEL G. ward/ LNIV. OF BIRMINGHAM 



i^W\^ v' PATRICIA J. WATSON/LNIV. OF WALES ABERY 
Y^ *^i JERRY W. WEBSTER/ LNIV. OF LEEDS 



STWATH 



RICHARD H. WEISLER/ INIV. OF GLASGOW 
WILLIA^l H. wheeler/ IMV. OF P VRIS 



KATHIE LOl WILLIAMS/lMV. OF M VOHIll 
MICHAEL WOSCOBOINIK/i NIV. OF PARIS 



/ PAGE 57 




Chemical 
Engineering 

ARNOLD FERGUSON / 1 

E. A. MAUTERER, III / 2 

DAVID FONTAINE, III / 3 

HUGH MCCLAIN / 4 

REINALDO CASTELLO-VARGAS / 5 

MIKE FARNELL / 6 

JOHN MORRIS / 7 

SAMUEL TILDEN / 8 

CARLOS SAUREZ / 9 

PAUL MALLON / 10 

MARK EVERS / 11 

FINESSED: 
VINCENT PROVENZA 



PAGE 58 / Engineering Seniors 



Civil 
Engineering 

1 / CHRIS SHERIDAN 

2 / JOHN GRAY 

3 / BIFF BLRK 

4 / MIKE ENGLER 

5 / WARD PIRDUM 

6 / MA'IT ANDERSON 

7 / JACK LABORDE 

8 / III GH BLAIN 

9 / DIDLEY RICHTER 

10 / DOl'G WILLIAMS 

11/ JOE «;endron 

12 / TONY FRI<;iLS 

l.'i / int. JOHN MKLAl'S 

11 / "rHE < HIEF." WALTER BLESSEY 
1.1 / «;eRRY HANAFY 

16 / WILL CHARBONNET 
I 7 / STEVE WALTON 
\i\ I JOE CALI 
I*) / IMC H DISAN<; 

20 / MIKE HEIN 

21 / STEVE LEBLANC 



1M)F.TEBMINANT: 

<;ynthia 
john flanagan 
ron >icginnis 
j»»h> stewart 




STEVE HIFFMAN 

1948-1971 



/ PAGE 59 



Electrical Engineering 




n 




Hfini'^^' \m 


li 

10 1 


n 






^ r 


^/ 


^\fim 


>H 


)a 


) S 


(M ur 


T^- 


' V-S?i '^ A 


/^ \ 


/i5 ^ n / 


(V/' 


11. 




u 


f\ vl'^'k 




/ 






')% 


IM 


/ ib \ 




Vv. 


r 


U^j/ I"* } 


IMli 


\J 



ERNIE CESPEDES / 1 

TOM PLANCHARD / 2 

DAVID PEREZ / 3 

MIKE BOLTON / 4 

DAN GARCIA / 5 

WAYNE JOHNSON / 6 

TOM SMITH / 7 

JOEL PENICK / 8 

TILDEN CHILDS / 9 

T.H.E. DOUBLE 'e' SHAFT / 10 

BILL MCCRAY / 11 



LANSING EVANS / 12 

LEON PESSES / 13 

JULIAN KOCH / 14 

TOM LAZA / 15 

DAVID CASTANON / 16 

ROBERT MENDOW / 17 

JOHN KRUPSKY / 18 

I.E.E.E. OFFICERS / 19 

IN THE LAGOON: 

GEORGE PLAKOTOS 

VICTOR WALZ 



PAGE 60 / Engineering Seniors 



ROGER SCHR,\i\II\I / 1 

DOUG GROG AN / 2 

DANIEL LEWIS / 3 

DAVII) MILES / 4 

IVIICHAEL COBO / .1 

CHRIS CHURCH / 6 

TKI) SILVKK / 7 

WALTER LA^IIA / 8 

DOUGLAS ROBINSON / 9 



M0H«;AN JONES / 10 
RICHARD WAVELL / 11 

MOONLICIITINC: 
ROBERT (;REENE 
ROBERT HYMAN 

STEVE ki:mble 

JIM KOONTZ 
RICHARD STRAIN 









c:-.:jst-i^^mmT~\, .-.* 



Engineering Curriculum 




JOHN MUELLER / 1 

HUGH MANSON / 2 

TOM TWIFORD. JR. / 3 

CARV CO>IARDA / 4 

CARR LEE FLETCHER / 5 

LUIS MALDONADO / 6 

JIMMY Y VRTER / 7 

GERALD <:1IAMPAGNE / 8 

DUDLEY SMITH / 9 

III <;il I ri.I.ER / 10 

MAURY riCIIELOUPE / 11 



PHILLIP SUTHERLAND/ 12 

TED LONG / 13 

ItWDY CASSERLEIGII / 14 

l> TlIK SHOP: 

riM III "VIATEL 

ROBERT Kl BLANDER 

LESTER PALLISER. JR. 

DENNIS RIDDLE 

STEVE SZYAllRSKI 

JOHN WUST. JR. 



Mechanical Engineering 




/ P VCF 61 



JOHN GARNET ABBOTT 

JERRY F. ADAMS 

ROBBIE J. ADAMS 

CHRIS ALBRECHT 

THOMAS E. ALLISON 

CHARLES AMANN 



DONALD ASPELUND 

ASHTON B, AVENGO 

JEFF AYCOCK 



MATT BAKER 

FRED A. BASHA 

EVERETT L. BEASLEY, JR. 



ART BECKER 

FREDERICK L. BELL 

ALAN BEYCHOK 

JOHN BIVONA 

MOHAMED SADIK BIZANTI 

PHIL BOOGAERTS, JR. 



WILLIAM H. BRUNDIGE 

WILLIAM J. BURKETT 

PETER CALI 

WILLIAM W. CAMERON 

THOMAS A. CANALE 

VIC CARRIERE 



ANTOINE CHALHOUB 

CRAIG CHANEY 

JOHN CHERAMIE 

RICHARD B. CLARK 

VICTOR C. CRANE 

EILEA CRUMP 



JOSEPH CUTRO 

JOHN CVEJANOVICH 

MOHAMED DAHAB 

JAMES DALY 

GORDON S. DANN 

KENT B. DAVEY 



OMEER C. DAVIS 

LEO DIBENEDETTO 

DENNIS DUCOTE 

JAC DUDENHEFER 

DOUGLAS V. DUVIGNEAUD 

DAVID EBERT 




I 



PAGE 62 / Engineering Undergraduates 




M MU.IAI. FAf;iO 
JOHN L. FEGLEY 
KOIX.KR FIKI.nS 
IIKIUIKKT <.. flSIIKR 

Dvv \. fi.a>ac;a> 

MI* IIAKI. KfXiARTy 



KO.N (.ASH«» 
FRA>K A. CEISEL 
DAVE GERSTENGERGER 
DE.VMS GIESEMANN 
HFGHAKr) T. GI.\M\NO 
JAMES B. GODWIN, III 



DAVID GRIENER 
CLIFTON E. GRIM, HI 
G. BRLCE GRIMES 
GARY B. GRISHAM 
FRED GRLBISS 
RONNIE GLZMAN 



JOHN M. HARLAN, JR. 
JOSEPH T. HARMLTH, III 
GLENNON J. HARRISON 
DAVID HEBERT 
ANTHONY C. HENRIQIEZ 
NICHOLAS HERNANDEZ 



DARJIYL J. HICKMAN 
RICHARD HIRSCH 
JEFF HODGES 
REX M. HOLMLIN 
DANIEL HOM 
DALE HUNN 



GEORGE INDEST 
JOHN JAMES 
PERRY >V. JENNINGS 
JERRY WAYNE KEEL 



THOMAS KENNA 
TANVEER SAMI KHAN 
W. A. KLEIN 
MICHAEL ALLAN KNAPP 



nORERT P. LACLEDE 
DAVID LANDRY 
JAMES B. LANE 
DAVID I.ANGSTO:< 



/ PACE 63 



MICHAEL F. LARKIN 

GARY LARSEN 

DOUGLAS R. LAWRENCE 

HENRY LEE 

THOMAS LEE 

CARL LEEDY 



ROBERT A. LEESON, JR. 

JOHN LOCANTRO, III 

JOHN T. MAHONEY, JR. 

ROBERT W. MAHOOD 

JOHANNES J. MARKUS 

BEN MARTIN 



ARTHUR MARTINEZ, JR. 

CARLOS MATA 

BRYAN S. MC GINNIS 

JOHN MELLO 

ROLANDO MENENDEZ 

CHARLES L. MOORE 



RICHARD J. MOSS 

ROBERT JAMES MOTCHKAVITZ 

JAMES B. MULLIS, III 

WAYNE NAIMOLI 

DANIEL R. NASH 

CARLOS NEUARES 



PETER NEWHOUSE 

MICHAEL S. NOBLE 

CORT O'BRIEN 

JACOB PLICQUE 

LAWRENCE OERLING 

ALAN ORKIN 



JOHN ORR 

JAMES ORTH 

WILLIAM PAYER 

JAMES L. PERREIN 

LOUIS JOS PETRIE 

H. PICARDI 



BRUCE I. PRINTZ 

HARRY F. QUARLS 

GARY QUENAN 

MICHAEL L. RACHELSON 

DON M. RANDOLPH, II 

GARY W. RAUBER 



PHILLIP W. RAUSER 

DENNIS V. RAYMOND 

ALI RIAHI 

GEORGE ROBINSON 

WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ, JR. 

LEON J. ROGERS 



(^^^^ F-^ ^/ 




PAGE 64 / Engineering Undergraduates 




S. MARK HOWE 
STEPHKN SAI.LMAN 
.JIMMY I,. SAN MARTIN 



ERIC SAWYER 

WILLIAM D. SEILING, JR. 

ROBERT SILVERMAN 



DAVID M. SIMS 
WILLIAM SLOAN 
SANDER SMILES 



ED SMITH 

JAMES A. STANCZAK 

SAMUEL J. STOKES, HI 



MIGUET A. SLAU 
DANIEL J. SULLrVAN 
MARK SYTtOR.A 
LEE TERRELL 
BARNELL J. THIBODEAl-X 
MALRICE G. THIELE, JR. 



CHRISTOPHER J. TIMKEN 
LARRY P. TOIPS 
STEPHEN A. TROXLER 
JOHN TURNER 
ROBBERT W. VORHOFF 
JOSEPH WALL 



GEORGE M. WEBB. JR- 
ALAN S. WEBER 
DAVin E. WEIDNER 
W. n. WEIDNER 
THOMAS W. WEST 
WARREN W. WHITE. JR. 



GORDON >IILLER WIECAND, H 

STEVE WOLFE 

FELIPE WOLL 

JOHN VOING 

OTIS WINGO YOING. JR. 

MARK ZEITVOGEL 



/ PAGE 65 



ll 




PAGE 66 / Computer Center 




/ PAGE 67 










-TV 1- 


»1^':« 




i 



i 

1 



PAGE 68 / EteLTA Regional Primate Research Center 




/ PACE 69 



Anthropology 



SEATED : 

DAVID POTTER 

JACQUELYN DAY 

JOHN CARROLL 

ALTHEA TESSIER 

KAY HUDSON 

BRENDA SAUNDERS 

MALCOLM SHUMAN 

STANDING: 

MAURICE ONWOOD 

CURTIS BUCK 

DALE REES 

DON DONHAM 

JEANNE EVANS 

NEWELL WRIGHT 

JACK SAUNDERS 




* 



PAGE 70 / Graduate School 




vKATFIl: 

H Mill \II \ AMIKKSON 

STAMIINC: 

PROF. DONALD ROBERTSON 

f.i:r»Rf;F. mani>zv< k 

ItOC.KR i.RKKN 

SI SAN lURKNIIM'M 

HANABA >Tl NN 

PROF. (; VK<:iI.IA DAVIS 

TKRRY SI.M^IONS 

PROF. JE.SSIE POESCH 

M \!n I.Ol ISE HENDERSON 

< Anoi. <;o^in»;ton 

I.IRKING AT DF.I.CADO: 

SI SAN GRADY 

•MARY KLAASEN 

>IARY LAWSON PENDLETON 

LINDA MILLER 



Art/History 




Art Studio 



FRONT: 

BILL MCCLARY- 
STEPHEN LOWRY 
WILLIAM SELANDER 

MIDDLE: 
DELAN BLSH 
HAROLD SWAYDER 
JESSEE POIMOELF 
MART POLDMETS 

BACK: 

DEMSE Y'ALLON 
MICHAEL O'BRIEN 
PATRICIA JESSEE 
SAM JOHNSON 
ALBERT H. SMITH, JR. 
STEPHEN WILSON 
JOANN CREENBERC 
ROBERT PARKS 

Ll-RKINC ELSEWHERE: 

SISTER SANDRA ARDOY'NE 

ROBERT EVANS 

JACK GATES 

ROBERT LEWIS 

RI< HM«1ND STIBBS 

LINDA WALKER 



/ PAGE 71 



FRONT HOW: 

DR. ARTHUR WELDEN 

JOYCE VERRETT 

DR. RICHARD LUMSDEN 

DR. ALFRED SMALLEY 

BARBARA CLARKE 



DR. 



SECOND ROW: 

DR. JOHN SEED 

DR. RICHARD MILLS 

WILLIAM MCDONALD 

KENNETH ROUX 



TBIBD ROW: 

EDWIN POWELL 

LINDA VACCA 

DR. ROBERT GROOVER 

JOHN CONNER 



♦ 



FOURTH ROW: 

JOYCE LEVINGSTON 

DR. ERIK ELLGAARD 

DR. DENNIS NEW 

DENNIS DUPLANTIER 

FIFTH HOW: 

JUDY ZETTERGREN 

FLORENCE ROSE 

LESLIE ZETTERGREN 



STANDING: 

DR. E. PETER VOLPE 

DR. JOHN BARBER 

AUSTIN FITZJARRELL 

JAMES TURPEN 

CLAUDIA DEGRUY 

DR. JOAN BENNETT 

DR. S. MERYL ROSE 

GERALD DOLLAR 

CARL MOHRHERR 

DR. MERLE MIZELL 

PHILLIP MOUNT 



Biology 




PAGE 72 / Graduate School 




Chemistry 



SEATED: 

ACHYIT KIKADE 
MICHAEL KEENAN 
WILLIAM THORN 
EDWARD GAVSE 
MOHI>DER CHATTHA 
MARY FRANCES WINKLER 
SHIRLEY YANG 
SHEIE Lf 
JIN-RONG CHANG 
HAVEN SCOTT ALDRICH 
MILO HASSLOCK 



STANDING: 
CARL DOIMIT 
EDITH ONG 
VRAJESH TIWARI 
SI NG-PING CHEN 
ROBERT VIGNES 
PETER LOSAVIO 
EDWARD DAVIS 
ROBERT BENNO 



INOnCANIC : 

GWENDOLYN MORRIS 
TIMOTHY R0<;ERS 
JOHN WILLIAMS 
HEIT-KENG YEH 




DR. JOE POE 
MATT HOGAN 
BRUCE SNYDER 
LISA COVINGTON 
BRIAN MORAN 



Classics 




Economics 



MARY MALCHOW 
DONALD KEMP 
JULES LEBON III 
PETER JACXSENS 
MASAHIKO HORIE 
JAIME POMBO 
HANS FLICKENSCHILD 
OLIVER HORD 



I 



PAGE 74 / Graduate School 




'uiT^I v.-i.<^e^>: --i->c.,-*^'>.v,««rt'-:'^i»». 




Education 



/ PACE 75 



WANDA SAKOWSKI 
DR. WEBER DONALDSON 
VIRGINIA TICE 
NELL BORAH 
MARY MARQUARDSEN 
HOLLY MORGAN 
LUCILLE BOILARD 
BETH MOUNT 
CAROL TELFORD 
MERRIT BLAKESLEY 
BONNIE KELLER 
STEPHEN KATZ 
SUSAN FITCH 
JOE LACOUR 
SANDY MUTINA 
MARGARET ROSE 
MARILYN WOLF 
EILEEN o'NEIL 
LYNN FRANK 
KAREN JANSSEN 

PARMI LES ABSENTS: 
SANS NAHNYBIDA 
JEAN RUELLO 
STEPHANIE SIGAL 
MARIE LOUISE RAPHALEN 
ROSS DONNELLY 
JOANN KLING 
BECKY CLOUDMAN 



English 



LARRY NORWOOD 

DIANA DUVALL 

CHRISTINE MORTENSEN 

DAN PHILLIPS 

DAVID ARNETT 

LOUIS BAUGNON 

ALICIA ALDAYA 

REV. JAMES HURLEY 

ALICE RUSBAR 

DR. PURVIS E. BOYETTE 

BARBARA MELITZ 

RICHARD MARSHALL 




French and Italian 




PAGE 76 / Graduate School 




Geology 




LUCY PERROIV 
RUSSELL GODWIN 
SUSAN OGDEN 
NORMAN KEUL 
DIANE KUIVIPF 
AUBREY FORD 
GENE BARR 
ROBERT DEWELL 
HEIDI HEADLEY 
GLENN DELATTE 
BOBBY POARCH 

NICHT IM DAS PHOTO: 
MARIELnSE CHAMPAGNE 
DWIGHT LANGSTON 
ANN MARTIN 
ALBERT FINK 
BRIGITTE MAY 
DIANA NEWTON 
MICHAEL NIEBERGER 
WILLIAM ODOM 
SAMUEL OSBORNE 
WERNER SCHROEDER 
.1. T. THORNTON 



COfNTERCLOCKWlSE : 

BILL WILBERT 

DR. RONALD PARSLEY 

DR. H. E. YOKES 

MANDY HUNT 

LORILEE MCDOWELL 

JOHN MCDOWELL 

KRISHNA KUMAR ROY 

H. C. SKINNER 

DR. HAMILTON JOHNSON 

NOEL ANDRESS 

JOACHIM MEYER 

ELLY ROLAF 

JIM EDISON 

SCOTT SN^TIER 

W. L. WELLS 

MANECK G. CHICHGAR 

WILLIAM E. DAUGHDRILL 



German 



/ PAGE 77 





History 



Latin 

American 

Studies 



SEATED: 

KATHY DYER (M.A.T. ) 

RUDOLPH HAMMACK 

STANDING: 

ARTHUR WHITE 

NANCY F. ANDERSON 

RAYMOND NUSSBAUM 

GERALD CARPENTER 

ROCER SUBLITT 

ANDERSON CHILD 

PAPPY 

SYLVIA FREY 

TRACY ROMERO ( M.A.T. ) 

WILLIAM L. HOGAN 



TOM FIEHRER 

DON COERVER 

HILDA TEN BRINK (L.A.S. ) 

TONY BRUTON 

ERIC GORDON 

JAMES RAMSEY ( L.A.S. ) 



SEATED: 

MARILLA FURCOLOW 

DR. ALBERT VAZQUEZ 

DR. RICHARD GREENLEAF 

NANCY WINGATE 

STANDING: 

JOHN EVANS 

BEN AGUIRRE 

PHILLIP THOMPSON 

SISI DI LAURA 

JOHN CUNNINGHAM 

KATHLEEN GAMBLE 

LOIS VENDITTO 

JANET BENDER 

SHELLEY BOWEN 

LARRY BOYER 

ANNE ARNOLD 

CYNTHIA SMITH 

LANNY JOHNSON 

ON A SLOW BOAT: 

OLIVIA P. KEETH 

EILEEN KIRK 

MARY C. STRETCH 

HILDA TEN BRINK 




PAGE 78 / Graduate School 




Mathematics 



SEATED; 

PATRICK KELLEY MEEHAN 

WILLrAM WILFONG 

JOHN YUAN 

JOE HENDRICKSON 

LARRY CAMPBELL 

BILL JONES 



STA>'DI?fG: 

MIKE VON KlILENBERC 
PETER DEPAEPE 
ALONSON TAKAHASHI 
BRINO WICHNOSKI 
ROGER TISHLER 
DAVID WALLACE 
DIETRICH HELMER 
TUCKER HATHORN 
GUS GINSBURG 
FRITZ KRAUSS 



Music 




SEATED: 

nONME ZAKOTNIK 
( II \KLES RLANCy 
JOHN JOYCE 

STA>DI>C: 
WILMWI M \Y 
(.KR\I niNK HI nnELL 
KI.IZVIIKI'H S(HWARZ 
P VTRK I V WOOnvRD 
KITH FALCON 
THOMAS RUSHING 

I>' THE PIT: 

itKTi^ III. vn<:q 

H) HHOl SSVRD 
I I IsK < \MIMJN 
l)\\ II) DKVI'KR 
M VR^ H\T(HFTTE 

WAVNF iionns 

■M VKGARET JOHNSON 
H\V 1.1 PER 
slSAN M( ni FFEE 
KLLEN PI.VTVMONE 
(.1 VMNETT\ PI.l >IMER 

M vin i(>rtorh:h 



/ PACE 79 



Philosophy 




JAMES O. BENNETT 
JAMES N. LANGHOFF 
WILLIAM J. COSKREY 
VAZKEN N. ASADOUKIAN 
JOHN L. HOLLEMAN 
HENRY J. FOLSE 
EDWARD G. BALLARD 
MICHAEL E. ZIMMERMAN 
ROBERT I. JUHASZ 
VAUGHANA MACY 
CHARLES R. SCHMIDTKE 



Physics 



FRONT ROW: 

JACK MEEHAN 

BILL MEY 

BRADLEY ELFMAN 

ALAN JOHNSON 

TERRY SONNONSTEINE 

SECOND ROW: 

BILL PAPAIOANNOU 

RALPH LINN 

JOEL AXT 

JOHN HICKS 

DON MOREL 

MASAO NAGAO 



THIRD ROW: 

NGUYEN HANH 

MARVIN JONES 

CRUSE MELVIN 

TOM RUSSELL 

BOB HILL 

POLARIZED: 

CLIFF BOASSO 

VERNON COTTLES 

DARRELL GALDE 

DEEPAK GUPTE 

BARRY HAINDEL 

RICHARD HARRISON 

KAI-LI KO 

SAL LONGO 

JOE PENG 




PAGE 80 / Graduate School 



SEATED: 

bill avery 

i.kk i)owt)y 

doik; youngren 

larry moore 

standing; 

earl bender 

glen nighols 

britt pearlman-ahlferd 

paul iierrick 

cathy harmon 

ladom wong-nom albergotti 

chris miller 

steve fisher 

dave collins 

willie walf 

don dickson 

in a smoke filled room: 

david bethlne 

margaret gates 

tim gibbons 

diane jennings 

candy' perchan 

frank petrusak 

dennis schill 



Political Science 





PSYCHOLOGY 



KNEELING: 
SHARON CARLTON 
J. C. RILEY 
LAIR\ KAUFMAN 
DICK NASH 

STANDING: 

BARBARA MCCLINTON 

TOM SPRINGER 

CHRISTINE CALDWELL 

PAT EDSON 

TOM o'bRIEN 

FE LAI GH LIN 

SALLY DIVELY 

TIM ROSEN 

JOAO OLIVEIR-A 

TOM HEEBINK 

MARTY WAITE 

DAN MIRPHV 

DAN MORIARTY 



/ PAGE 81 




Sociology 




SEATED: 

BARBARA GIULLARY 
FLORA BLACKSTOCK 
SALLY SEAMAN 
ROBERT TERDEMAN 
CLARK CROPP 
PAMELA POISSONT 

STANDING: 

DR. THOMAS KTSANES 

MEYER REED 

JOHN MCCALLUM 

JACK KRON 

BILL CAMPBELL 

GEORGE HOAG 



Spanish and 
Portuguese 



I 



FRONT ROW: 

MARC MENEGHINI 

DAVID WARREN 

PROF. DANIEL S. WOGAN 

MARIA LAGO 

SECOND HOW: 
JAMES RAMSEY 
CRISTINA JOHNSON 
CAROLINE MASSEY 
JORGE REYES 
MIRIAM PERRICONE 
RON MULLER 
JOSE VILASUSO 

THIRD ROW: 
CLAIRE MORRISON 
MERCEDES TIBBITS 
CARLOS ROMO 
MARY STRETCH 
NORKA DIAZ 

NO ESTAN PRESENTE: I 

MAS DE LA MITAD DEL DEPARTMENTC 



PAGE 82 / Graduate School 



I 




Theatre 

CENTER STAGE: 

PATRICIA LAZARO 

L. J. DECriR 

MARI WEBER 

MICHAEL WRIGHT 

MAKIKO TAKACI 



IN THE WINGS: 

CLUNTON CLEAVER 

JOHN GALBREATH 

MAY WELLS JONES 

QIEALY KEYES 

CORA LEE PHILLIPS 

ROBERT MOYER 



/ PACE 83 




A. W. ALLEN 

JAMES WILLIAM ARMBRUSTER 

STEPHEN MARK HERMAN 

RICHARD H. BRETZ 

STEPHEN A. BRINKMAN 

JEROME THOMAS BROUSSARD 



MICHAEL W. BRYANT 

STANLEY K. BRYDE 

WILLIAM W. BURSON, JR. 

GLENN PHILIP CARSON 

JOHN WARD CARSON 

HENRY LAWRENCE CHANIN 



ALLEN RYAN CHRISTENSEN 

CHARLES BURTON CLARK 

DANIEL DAVID CLARK 

LOUIS HOLT CLOUD 

ROGER W. COLLINS 

MICHAEL JAMES CONNOR 



CHRIS CONRAD 

GREGORY JAMES COTTER 

ROBERT W. CROSBY 

NORMAN JOHN CURRIER 

CHARLES R. DAUL 

JACQUES F. DEBORSBLANC 



JEAN PIERRE DECORMIS 

TODD L. DEMPSEY 

RICHARD P. DIEHL 

BALAJI DORAISWAMY 

PHILIP J. DORSEY 

WAYNE A. DOWNING 



HUGH M. DURDEN 

PAUL EDWARD EBEL 

ELROY WALTER ECKHARDT 

STANLEY E. ELLINGTON, JR. 

SAMUEL W. ENFIELD 

WALTER CLARENCE FARMER 




i 




i 


\ 


•J 




:\ 




1 



PAGE 84 / Graduate Business Administration 




ex 




^ ..J.n 


k 


mm: 


INDUSTRIAL »-•""«= 
MANUAL ""^ 

JULY *""'■ 

19B9 1969 


fj 




^^^^ 







♦T 










A 











t >. 



RALIMI FRANCIS FELDER 
MICHAEL FERMAN 
WILLIAM ROBERT FINNECAN 
.JOHN R. FLINT 
JLLIAN CHARLES FREEL, JH. 
MERLE FREITAC 



JOHN MASON FRYE 
JOSEPH T. GADDIS 
RICHARD W. GARFINKEL 
CHARLES C. CAZAREK 
GEORGE N. CIACOPPE 
RICHARD HOWARD GOLDSMITH 



FORREST V. GRAVES 
JACK H. GRIFFITH, JR. 
DAN S. GRIMES 
GREGORY KENT GROVE 
JAMES LAWRENCE HANSEN 
WILLARD ENGENE HARRISON 



JEFFREY' K. HARTMAN 
GEORGE P. HIGDON, JR. 
OLIVER A. HORD 
JOHN C. HOUSE 
LEAMON E. HOWELL 
WILLIAM MCCAW HL'GHES, JR. 



RICHARD E. HULL, JR. 
CHARLES A. HUTST 
STEVEN G. JAHNCKE 
MARVIN A. JEFFCOAT 



ERIC V. JOHNSON 
GARY D. JOHNSON 
JEFFREY HIRST JOHNSON 
SCOTT A. JOHNSON- 



JERRY W. JOHNSTON 
OWEN L. JONES, JR. 
WILLIAM A. JONES 
PETER DE KANWrr 
CHESTER E. KEITH, JR. 
ALLEN R. KELLER 



AUGUST L. KE1TES 
NELSON J. KIESWETTER 
DAVID n. KI.INGENSMITH 
WILLIAM KLINKENSTEIN 
EDWARD M. KNOFF, JR. 
RICHARD A. LACQUEMENT 



/ PAGE 85 



BRUCE THOMAS LAMMERS 

KEITH D. LAROSE 

DICK TURNER LECtERE 

ALBERT R. LEPAGE 

SUSAN P. LEVIN 

MIKE LEVY 



JOHN L. LINDARS 

JOHN A. LOSSE, IH 

THOMAS W. LOTT 

KAM HOONG LYE 

EMANUEL P. MAIMONE 

JERRY W. MANGRUM 



DAVID J. MANIFOLD 

MARCUR F. MARKS 

JAMES P. MARTINEK 



MICHAEL J. MATT 

JAMES L. MATTHEWS 

GEORGE A. MCCAMMON 



DAVID K. MCDUFFIE 

JOHN L. MCHALE, in 

BRIAN M. MENZEL 



RUSSELL A. MERICLE, JR. 

EDWARD H. MILER 

ALBERT J. MILLER, JR. 



WILLIAM E. MILLER 

GEOFFREY S. MOAKLEY 

CHARLES L. MONNOT, III 

RUSSELL F. MOON 

JAMES F. MULLEN 

DON H. MURDOCK 



WALTER L. MURFEE 

HUDSON R. NICHOLS 

WILLIAM G. O'CONNOR 

TAYLOR A. ONCALE 

NIHAT A. OZAN 

JOHN R. PAGE 




* 



PAGE 86 / Graduate Business Administration 



f Nj^T' >?i|. p«7.' 

1^ 



1 




RICHARD R. PACE 
NICHOLAS H. PARKER 
RALPH E. PARKHOUSE 
MELVI.N C. PAYNE 
JAMES M. PEEPLES 
ROBERT H. PEERY 



LUIS A. PEtLICER 

JOSE M. DE OLIM PERESTRELO 

NANCY B. PINSON 

JAJVIO CASH POWELL 

ROBERT >I, POWERS 

JOHN L. RAFFERTY 



JOSEPH RAFFIANI, JR. 
BRAD C. REYNOLDS 
JACKSON S. ROBBINS 
CHARLES H. BOEDER 
JOHN C. ROTH 
LOUIS K. ROTHBARD 



ASHTON J. RYAN, JR. 
JORGE A. SARRIA 
CHARLES H. SEAL 
CATHERINE E. SEARCY 
JOHN R. SHERBLTINE 
RICHARD L. SIMMONS 



EDWARD W. SKINNER 
VINCENT L. SLACEL 
WILLIAM E. SNEEL 
ALV.4RO G. SOLERA 
JOANNE R. STERBENZ 
DEXTER STEVENS 



DONALD G. SYLVESTER 
RALPH S. TAGGART 
WILLIAM L. TARNEV 
DAVID C. TATO>I 
JERRY TENBRINK 
PETER D. THACHER 



BRUCE A. THOMAS 
KENARD N. TURPIN, HI 
JAY E. VAUGHN 
REBECCA V. WARD 
DWICHT C. WEST 
ANDREW T. WHITLEY 



DAVID A. WIENER 
HENRY G. WILLIAMS 
WILLIAM WILLOUGHBY' 
WAYNE J. WILSON 
MARC C. ZAVADIL 
ROBERT W. ZIIFLE 



/ PAGE 87 



Chemical Engineering 




RElVOtD S, YU 
CHING-YUAIV HSIEH 

C. U. PATEL 
JIM FORD 

V. D. PRABHU 

PAUL WILLIAMS 

ROBERT GIARDINA 

TSIN-CHAN LI 

GEORGE SWAN 

D. D. DOSHI 

ON THE RIG: 

JAMES BISHARA 

MIRIAM E. JOHN 

MARVIN K. JONES 

ALLEN LAMBERT 

LEWIS MAYARD 

JULIUS NEUMEYER 

MILES C. SEIFERT 

MICHAEL TROSCLAIR 

G. VILLAFANE 

FRANZ VOGT 



PAGE 88 / Graduate Engineering 



Civil Engineering 




CLOCKWISE: 

NAVICHANDRA PATEL 
RAJMIKANT AMIN 
JERRY SCHROEDER 
DAVE STEVENS 
BILL POWELL 
PERCY FREEMAN 
LARRY MICKAL 
SUDHIR MEHTA 

UP A CREEK: 

SAHABETTIN ALGANATAY 

ALBERT COOCH 

BEN HANEY 

ROLLAND MURA 

HERBERT ROl'SSEL 

CLIFFORD STREET 



/ PAGE 89 



I 



WILLIAM E. BARKMAN 

POPAT D. MAKADIA 

R. P. KUMAR 

SOHRAB D. CHOKSEY 

GOKALDAS GAJARIA 

SYED MOINUDDIN 

YIH-YOUNG CHEN 

DU-TOIV DOUNG 

SHEIH HSEIH 

GREGORY MCGAR 

VIKRAM SESAI 

M. P. JANI 



Electrical Engineering 



i 

f 

I 

I 




PAGE 90 / Graduate Engineering 



I 



KANA PAREKH 
DHIRAJ KOTHARI 
MAGAN KANSAGRA 
WAYNE MORSE 
CHUCK WAUGAMAN 
FREDERICK J. BROWIV 
ED MOFFATT 
DA>1D J. GARLAND 
HANK GLINDMEYER 
LOUIS O. SMITH, JR. 
WARREN WHITE 
FRED PARTUS 
DOUGLAS BOY'LAN 
WALLY GRANT 
JOHN HUERKAMP 
GOPAL SUTHAR 
JAGDISH PATIDAR 



UNDER THE TABLE: 

BOB CHAN 

JWO-MIN CHEN 

CHARLES H. GOODMAN 

DAVID HALL 

ADAM HARRIS-HARSANYI 

DAVID HEGEDUS 

PRAKASH KARKAL 

RAHMAN KHAN 

SAM LIN 

PAUL MUNAFO 

HE MAN PATTANI 

UWE PONTIUS 

PANKAJ SHAH 

SKIP SMITH 

YI-LUNG SU 

PATRICK TOU 

FRITZ WILL 



Mechanical Engineering 




/ PAGE 91 



Riverside 

Research 

Laroratories 




t 



PAGE 92 / Hebert Center 



International 

Center 

For 

Medical 

Research 

And 

Training 

At 

Cali, 

Columbia 




NOT PICTURED: 
CALI, COLUMBIA 



I. C M. R. & T. / PAGE 93 



Seniors 




1 / MEG RITCHEY 20 / 

2 / MAX TOBIAS 21 / 

3 / ED SCHLESINGEK 22 / 

4 / JOHN LANDREM 23 / 

5 / JOHN STEINER 24 / 

6 / PAT SHELDON 25 / 

7 / HARRY HENDERSON 26 / 

8 / CLAYTON RAMSEY 27 / 

9 / ED CASTAING 28 / 

10 / TOM BARR 29 / 

11 / STEVE SHARBER 30 / 

12 / MIKE COSSEY 31 / 

13 / PHIL MONTELEPRE 32 / 

14 / BEN HATFIELD 33 / 

15 / JOHN DEVLIN 34 / 

16 / WALLY QUINN 35 / 

17 / ERNIE CARRERE 36 / 

18 / BOB GREEN 37 / 

19 / FRANK PARRATT 38 / 



JOHN POINDEXTER 39 / 

BOB CASEY 40 / 

BUD NOEL 41 / 

BILL DEMARS 42 / 

DAVID KERSTEIN 43 / 

EARL MCCOLLAM 44 / 

ALEX ASHY 45 / 

JON MASSEY 46 / 

CHARLIE LECHE 47 / 

LENNY BOUZON 48 / 

RICARDO BILONICK 49 / 

GEORGE CROUSE 50 / 

RONNIE COX 51 / 

HARRY ANDERSON 52 / 

ED MCCLOSKEY 53 / 
RICHARD CHRISTOVICH 54 / 

PETER KEENAN 55 / 

MIKE o'keefe 56 / 

WAYNE ANDERSON 57 / 



DAN DELPRIORE 58 / 

RUBEN FREIDMAN 59 / 

COURTNEY WILSON 60 / 

MIKE HUGHES 61 / 

JOHN MANARD 62 / 

ABBOTT REEVES 63 / 

COLLINS VALLEE 64 / 

HENRY JUMONVILLE 65 / 

CHARLIE GRUBB 66 / 

DENIS BANDERA 67 / 

DAVID OESTREICHER 68 / 

FRED BLANCHE 69 / 

DON SHINDLER 70 / 

IRVING SHN AIDER 71 / 

BILL WHITE . 72 / 

DON PICKNEY 73 / 

MIKE FITZPATRICK 74 / 
JOEL LOEFFELHOLZ 
GERALD BOSWORTH 



DAVID CRAIG 

KENNY MEYER 

ALAN BOOKMAN 

BRAINERD MONTGOMERY 

ROBERT MAHONY 

JERALD BLOCK 

DAVID MARCELLO 

HENRY BERNSTEIN 

LYLE PHILIPSON 

JUDY TABB 

ANITA GANUCHEAU 

CHARLES HAHN 

DEE DRELL 

SERGIO LEISECA 

HARLEY CLUXTON 

JOHN HOLMES 

PETER EVERETT 




BARRISTER BRAWL 
CASUALTIES: 

HERBERT ALEXANDER 
BILL T. ALLISON 
PAUL ANDERSON 
AL L. ANDREWS 
PHIPPIP AZAR 
KEITH BELL 
LEONARD BEUINS 
RON BERTRAM) 
JACQUES BEZOU 
HAROLD BLOCK 
RICHARD BOITALL 
JOHN BRODERS 
BILL BROWN 



HUGH CHERRY 
RUTLEDGE CLEMENT 
TIM CLOUDMAN 
DAVID <;OMBE 
MICHAEL EI.IAS 
JIMMY FARWELL 
GREY FERRIS 
DAVID <;II.I.IS 
EDITH (;OMES 

JOE «;rant 

JOHN GROUT 
RONALD <;i RTLER 
HARRY HAHDIN 



JAMES HAYES 
ROBERT HEARIN 
JAMES KAMBUR 
HAROLD KUSHNER 
ROBERT LEE 

GEOFFREY LONGENECKER 
IRv\ MARCUS 
LOUIS MARRERO 
ELBERT MARTIN 
MALCOLM MEYER 
CHESTER PARKER 
JOSEPH PARKINSON 
RONALD POyi ETTE 



LIONEL PRICE 
DONALD RICHARD 
JAMES ROSS 
JOHN SCHOEN 
PHILIPP SEELIG 
STEPHEN SKI.AMBA 
DIANE SPIES 
HELEN SI LLIVAN 
WALTER THOMPSON 
LOUIS TRENCHARD 
JEFFREY VICTORY 
RALPH WHALEN 
JAMES WHEELER 
MICHAEL WOLFSON 



School of Law / pace 95 




1 / MO LEGARDEUR 


18/ 


2 / BARRY PERCH 


19/ 


3 / BRUCE HORACK 


20/ 


4 / JOHN BEATON 


21/ 


5 / JIM BURTON 


22/ 


6 / HAL SCOTT 


23/ 


7 / MIKE KATZ 


24/ 


8 / ANDY PLAUCHE 


25/ 


9 / JERRY SAPORITO 


26/ 


10 / ST. PAUL BOURGEOIS 


27/ 


11 / GIL STAMP LEY 


28/ 


12 / WES SHINN 


29/ 


13 / JOHNNIE CLAYTON 


30/ 


14 / GAYLE MARSHALL 


31/ 


15 / SIMON ODERBERG 


32/ 


16 / HARRY ROSENBERG 


33/ 


17 / DAVID EDWARDS 


34/ 



DOUG WALKER 35 / 

ED DUBISSON 36 / 

WILEY LASTRAPES 37 / 

SONNY WIEGAND 38 / 

DAW DELPRIORE 39 / 

BOB PEARSON 40 / 

FRAZIER RANKIN 41 / 

JEFF SEIDMAN 42 / 

RAINER LORENZ 43 / 

P. J. STAKELUM 44 / 

BOB CAUDLE 45 / 

DON BERNARD 46 / 

DONNA GUSTAFSON 47 / 

BOB TRACHMAN 48 / 

TOM SLINGLUFF 49 / 

RICK VERLANDER 50 / 

GUS MANTHEY 51 / 



GERALD HADDICAN 52 / 

MARCELLA ZIIFLE 53 / 

DAN SCHEUERMANN 54 / 

BILL KAMMER 55 / 

TOM MAHFOUZ 56 / 

ROGER ODGEN 57 / 

PAUL GAROFALO 58 / 

SKIP ORDEMANN 59 / 

BILL BRUMFIELD 60 / 

GAYLE LETULLE 61 / 

BILL GUISE 62 / 

BILL AXSON 63 / 

GLENN BRADFORD 64 / 

TOM STEELE 65 / 
BRAINERD MONTGOMERY 66 / 

JAMES WALLEY 67 / 

DAN RESTER 68 / 



JIM POPHAM 
BOB HACKETT 
THE "op" 
CYNDY SAMUEL 
NICK PIZZOLATTO 
PARKER DINKINS 
GREG GR.U)Y 
DAVE HERMANN 
ALAN PARR 
ANDY DORA 
CHARLES NESTOR 
ERNIE BARROW 
FLIP WILSON 
ERNIE SMALLMAN 
ROGER ROMBRO 
GENE KATZ 
MAC HANCOCK 



Second Year 




AT COFFEE: 

LARRY ABBOTT 

.1. D. ALVERSON 

DARRYL D. BERGER 

ANDRIS BLOMKALNS 

FREDRICK BOESE 

CHARLES BOURG 

ERNEST CARRERE 

RON CARROLL 

DAN <.ARl SO 

HARLEY CLliXTON 

KATHRYN COLBERN 

CLARENCE DOYLE 

DIEGO GIORDANO-ECHEGOYEN 



JEFFREY HACKER 
BARBARA HIRSCH 
LUCIIS HORNSBY 
ROBERT HIGHES 
GARY JOHNSON 
LAWRENCE JONES 
CHRISTIAN KEEDY' 
JEANNE KRIEGER 
JOHN LIPANI 
CHARLES LOZES 
ROBERT MANARD 
PATRICIA IMATHES 
DAVID MCGOWAN 



ED MCLLHENNY 
LEE MCMILLAN 
ERIC MEIERHOEFER 
MACHALE >IILLER 
RONALD NABONNE 
JOHN NICHOLSON 
COLVIN NORWOOD 
JOHN ROBBERT 
JOSEPH ROl SE 
LEON RIDLOFF 
RICHARD SALLOIM 
JOHN SAINDERS 
JAMES SCARLVTA 



DAN SCHEIERMANN 
KEVIN SCHOENBERGER 
LARRY SIMON 
JOHN SNELL 
ELLIOT SNELLINGS 
WILLIAM STAHL 
ROBERT SITHERLIN 
ROYAL Till RSTON 
GEORGE TROXELL 
ROBERT WASUni RN 
ALBERT WATSON 
LEROY WATSON 
ADRIENNE WESSLER 



School of Law / page 9' 



First Year 




FRONT ROW: 

BOB MORGAN 

WALDEN HINGEL 

CARL TRIESHMANN 

BOB HOFFMAN 

KERRY MASSARI 

CHARLIE DUFFY 



SECOND ROW: 

HERNAN FRANCO 

RICK EPSTEIN 

GAIL HAFNER 

GERRY WASSERMAN 



DON SHLIMBAUM 

CHARLES BRENDT 

AMY KENNON 

SANDRA GOLDSMITH 

THIRD ROW: 

EARLE BLIZZARD 

HENRY DEVENS 

BILL POUDRIER 

LARRY LOMBARDO 

NED KOHNKE 

DAVID WEIGEL 

BRIAN SONDES 

JERRY ALBUM 

JIM STOVALL 

FOURTH ROW: 

BORRIS UDDO 

MIKE PAWLUS 

IAN HIPWELL 

ROUMI GONZALEZ 



ROGER LANDHOLM 

JIM KNUDSON 

DON TAMBURO 

ROBERT LAKEY 

BILL WARD 

FIFTH ROW: 

TOM NOSEWILZ 

ALFONSO ARIAS 

ROGER SIMS 

MARSHA FEINBERG 

JIM RYAN 

MILTON LORENZ 

RON FAHRENBACHER 

PETER PICCIONE 

RON HARRIS 

BRIAN BEGUE 

DICK NORWOOD 

LENNIE GEYER 

SUSAN KORNS 

CRAIG KELLERMANN 




PAGE 98 / School of Law 



FRONT ROW: 
RALPH ALEXIS 
WALTER STUART 

SECOND ROW: 
STAN IRVIN 
WARREN MIGUEZ 
JOE NOLLY 
JIM CUNNINGHAM 
JEFF SAKAS 
HENRY BERTHELOT 

THIRD ROW: 
RONNIE HARRIS 
DAVID GOLIA 
DAN ELROD 
WAYNE CRESAP 
JOHN PICKRON 
JANICE GONZALES 
FRANK BARRY 
CALVIN FOX 

FOURTH ROW: 
DAVID SPENCER 



GEORGE GRAVES 
HARRY MORGAN 
TOM CARRAWAY 
RICH BURKE 
ED BURCHELL 
GEORGE BYRNE 

FIFTH ROW: 
EARLE BLIZZARD 
JIM WHITTENBURG 
HOWATT PETERS 
ROWLAND HEIDELBERG 
FRED BOYNTAN 
NED KOHNKE 
ROGER SIMS 
FRANK BURNSIDE 
BASILE UDDO 

SIXTH ROW: 
FRANK YOHAN 
DWIGHT NORTON 
LARRY DEAN 
PATRICIA ANN HAIR 



SF.VENTII ROW: 
MIKE WELLFORD 
GEORGE PEREZ 
TUCKER MELANCON 

F.ICHTH ROW: 
CINDY WEGMANN 
LENNIE FISHER 
DAYTON BAKER 



IN THE STACKS: 
JOSE ACOSTA 
JOHN ALBANESE 
FRANCOIS ALLAIN 
PAUL BARICOS 
JOHN BAUM 
MARK BEYER 
ROBERT BIRTEL 
HERBERT BOWERS 
FRED BRADLEY 
RANDALL BROOKS 



ANDREW BROWN 

PORTEUS BURKE 

LARRY CAMPBELL 

BILL CHERBONNIER 

GREG EATON 

GREG EATON SHIRLEY ECAN 

SHIRLEY EAGEN 

ROBERT ELLIS 

PATRICK FANNING 

ALFRED FARRELL 

DAVID FORSYTH 

WALTER FRIEDERICHSEN 

CLYDE GIORDANO 

GARY GOCHNOR 

KATHERINE GOLDMAN 

KENNETH GOLDSTEIN 

RAYMOND HAEUSER 

MORRIS HILL 

LUTHER HORTON 

CHARLES JENSEN 

JON JOHNSON 

DAVID KESLER 

HENRY KINNEY 




FRONT HOW: 
TRAN HUU DINH 
SANGUAN LEWMANOMONT 
FRANCOISE PECCOUD 

SECOND ROW: 
KATHY PIERSON 
BRIAN JONES 
JEFF KING 
BRAGG WILLIAMS 
PAUL MINOR 
JERRY o'KEEFE 

THIRD ROW: 
MICHAEL CUCULLU 
TERELL BROUSSARD 
GLEN FIELTON 
RONALD HARRIS 
MICHAEL KULCZAK 
DENNIS LARUSSA 
JIM SCUTTI 



FOURTH ROW: 
ROBERT FISHER 
FRANCOIS JOUVEL 
JACK ROBINSON 
LARRY BUCHTEL 
PAUL LEBAS 
ELMER GIBBONS 
BILL BENHAM 
PHIL ALLEN 
TOM SPROTT 

FIFTH ROW: 
LEE WALLACE 
STEVE LUNDSTROM 
MIKE COLEMAN 
RUTH ELLEN REVZEN 
CHARLES H. DE ST. CROIX 
PEGGY BERCK 
JOY BROWN 
RICHARD FELDMAIV 
JOSEPH RAULS 



TORGER OMDAHL 
GUY HUARD 



SIXTH ROW; 
JOE HANSEN 
GLENN ABEL 
LAMAR RICHARDSON 
RALEIGH OHLMEYER 
DAVID DAUME 
NORMAN WEAKER 
BARBARA JACKSON 
EARLE BLIZZARD 

SEVENTH ROW: 
CHARLES DUKE 

EIGHTH ROW: 
MITCH EX 
KEVIN WEIN 



IN THE STACKS: 

JESSE LEBLANC 
OCTAVE LIVAUDIAS 
BAHMIN LOFTI 
KEITH MAY 
BILL MORGAN 
IRA MOSS 
JOSEPH MYERS 
ADAM ORTEGO 
BRIAN PERRY 
MIKE PIPER 
THOMAS PIXTON 
ELON POLLACK 
LEO POORT 
LEONARD RADLAl ER 
BILL RANDS 
TIM ROMGER 
VALENTINE SCHEIRICH 
RICHARD SHERMAN 
JAMES WADLEY' 
SID WALTON 



/ PAGE 99 



ELLEN MAYO / 1 

SYLVLA. MINOR / 2 

LYNN HARRISON / 3 

DORINDA NOBLE / 4 

ESTHER MCBRIDE / 5 

KAREN COMMARATO / 6 

MARTHA HUGHES / 7 

STELLA NARCISSE / 8 

KAREN LEWIS / 9 

KAREN HEDDEN / 10 

PAULETTE COTHREN / 11 

GAIL RUBIN / 12 

HERMAN GATES / 13 

HOWARD STANTON / 14 

ANN MUSICK / 15 

ROBERTA GILL / 16 

BILL PETTY / 17 

ROSEMARY MCCRAHAN / 18 

LEWIS KECKLEY / 19 




PAGE 100 / School of Social Work 




20 / SARAH RAHAIM 

21 / DOUGLAS POSEY 

22 / JACK MARTIN 

23 / STELLA BROWN 

24 / SHELIA FLO^T) 

25 / CAROLINE DOTSON 

26 / ELAINE LORD 

27 / KAY GRANT 

28 / JAMES FRANK 

29 / LOUISE CATE 

30 / BOB DUET 

31 / SHARON CHUDY 

32 / JOE BRYAN 

33 / MARY HART 

34 / LYNN STURGEON 

35 / ANTONIO LUHAN 

36 / GLEN MCQUAGE 

37 / BEV SCHNEIDER 

38 / FR. JOHN NOONE 



39 / SUSAN KINGSTON 

40 / BARBARA JONES 

41 / SIS. MARY ANNE FRANK 

42 / JEWELL TURNER 

43 / KAREN THORNTON 

44 / KAYSEY SANCHEZ 

45 / MARY CORYN 

46 / PEGGY RICHARDS 

47 / DOUG HOLT 

48 / PENNY SHOLARS 

49 / THOMAS DEMARTTNI 

50 / HENRY LEE 

51 / PATTY NEALON 

52 / GINNY NEWLAND 

IN THE FIELD: 
ROSEMARY BARNHARDT 
DEWAIN BELGARD 
SUSAN BLATCHFORD 



PAMELA BUCHANAN 
MURIEL BURNSTEIN 
DAVID CARLETON 
CORA ALL CHANDLER 
SARA ANN CRAWFORD 
CONSTANCE CULBREATH 
MILO FAUSTERMANN 
BARBARA FEATHER 
RENNA GODCHAUX 
LINDA GRAVATTI 
CAROLYN HARDEN 

MALCOLM HESS 

ELAINE JOHNSON 

WILLIE KELLER 

EILEEN KRAUSS 

ANDRINA MCCAFFREY' 

EVA MCLEOD 

GAY MINES 

JAY NIEMAYAR 



GORDON PAGE 
DONALD PIERSON 
SUSANNA RENO 
RUTH STAM 
ANDRE E THIBODEAL'X 
REBEKAH VANHOOSER 
MARY VANOSTENBERG 
EARLEEN WAGNER 
GARY WHELCHEL 
DAN WILLIAMS 
BARBARA WOLITZ 




/ PAGE 101 




ANN JOHNSON / 1 

PAM WOOTEN / 2 

REITA TROUM / 3 

GEORGE INGLE / 4 

BILL SCHOOF / 5 

JOHN KING / 6 

EILEEN DAVIS / 7 

JAQULYN KENT / 8 

BRENDA BOCAGE / 9 

YUPA TUMPRAYOT / 10 

JUDY ROSS / 11 

DIANNE DRINKER / 12 

BARBARA LAUGHLIN / 13 

JACQUELINE SIMONEAUX / 14 



RUTH WELK / 15 

ELWOOD KLINE / 16 

ANNE ROBERTSON / 17 

EDWARD WOJNAROWSKI / 18 

DIANE LAMBLY / 19 

BEN KNOTT / 20 

ROBERT COOPER / 21 

JERRY CLARK / 22 

JAMES BROUSSARD / 23 

KAY KEMBLE / 24 

DON BOBO / 25 

LINDA JONES / 26 

ADA YOUNG / 27 

EVA MAE BOWIE / 28 

DAVID NIEMAN / 29 

EVELYN HOLT / 30 



SALVATORE CARUSO / 31 

EDWARD BUVENS / 32 

BRENDA KELLEY / 33 

VICKIE WILLIAMS / 34 

PHYLLIS HEATON / 35 

KATHY GRAFF / 36 

MIKE WHITE / 37 

BARBARA SMITH / 38 

MARY DEE FAIRCHILD / 39 

PATRICIA REED / 40 

JEANETTE LEWIS / 41 

WILMA DUNCAN / 42 

JEAN RINGLER / 43 

JUDITH FAUST / 44 

SHIRLEY HASPEL / 45 

CAROL CHANDLEE / 46 




PAGE 102 / School of Social Work 




/ PAGE 103 



JOHN ALSTON 

ROGER ANASTASIO 

ROBERT ANCIRA 

RICHARD ANDERSON 

THOMAS ANDERSON 

WINSTON ANDERSON 



LAURENCE AREND 

HENDRICK ARNOLD 

RONALD BARBIE 

STEPHEN BINNS 

JEROME BLACKMAN 

STEVEN BLACKWELL 



DAVID BONHAM 

JAMES BONNET 

ISAAC BROWDER 

ARCHIE BROWN 

SHERMAN BROWN 

GEORGE BURGESS 



RONALD BUSUTTIL 

HARRY CAZZOLA 

JOSEPH CHIAPELLA 

GEORGE CHU 

DELLIE CLARK 

STEPHEN COCHRAN 



GLORIA COKER 

CLIFFORD COLEMAN 

KENNETH COMBS 

JOHN CURTISS 

GARY DANOS 

RISE DELMAR 




PAGE 104 / School of Medicine — Seniors 






DALTON DIAMOND 
JON EDWARDS 
GERY EPLER 



REAVIS EfBANKS 
RICHARD EVANS 
MICHAEL FINN 



JACK FLEET 
BARRY FRAME 
JAN FRIEDMAN 










MARC FRIEDMAN 
LAWRENCE GALINKIN 
MICHAEL GALLIGAN 
PETER GOLDMAN 
MILES GRABER 
SANDRA GRABER 



JAY GRIMALDL 
CHARLES HADDAD 
RICHARD HALL 
CHARLES HANES 
GEORGE HARRIS 
WILLIAM HELVIE 



JEREMIAH HOLLEMAN 
JA>IES HOOKER 
RXNDOLPH HOWES 



%t% 



WALTER JAMES 
JOHN JOHNSTON 
JOHN JONES 



GERALD JOSEPH 
ROBERT KAMINSKI 
SCOTT KELLERMANN 



/ PAGE 105 



JAMES KNOEPP 
CONRAD KBEBS 



IRIS KRUPP 
IVRI KUMIN 



GLENN LAMBERT 
DOUGLAS LANDWEHR 



WAYNE LARRABEE 

CHARLES LILLY 

ROBERT LIPSON 

CHARLES LONG 

ALFRED LOTMAN 

DONALD LUEBKE 



ARTHUR MATTHEWS 

RICHARD MAY 

JOHN MCCABE 

THOMAS MCLURE 

JAMES MCQUITTY 

JAY MERTEN 



FLOYD MEYER 

BRUCE MEYERS 

MICHAEL MOORE 



TED MOORE 

JACK MORGAN 

JAMES MOROCK 



HAROLD NEELY 

DALE NICKEL 

PETER NIELSON 

JAMES NORTHINGTON 

DONALD NOVICK 

ARTHUR NUSSBAUM 




PAGE 106 / School of Medicine — Seniors 






C^ ^- ^; 






/ 




c3> ^ c^ 

{'^ U^f 1^ 







WILLIAM o'MARA 
MHHAEL RAYBECK 
JOHN REA 
JOSEPH ROMGER 
ROBERT ROYBAL 
JAMES SAALFIELD 



RANDOLPH SEYBOLD 
ROBERT SHAW 
JAMES SHELLEY 
HOWELL SLAIGHTER 
JAMES SMITH 
JOSEPH SOSNOW 



ANDREA STARRETT 
HENRY STELLING 
TOMMY SWATE 
LAURENCE TANAKA 
THADDELS TEAFORD 
WILLIAM THOMPSON 



PAUL TIBBITS 
TIMOTHY- TRICHE 
LAWRENCE TRUE 
JEFFREY TUCKER 



JOHN VAN BODEGOM 
M.AX VAN GILDER 
WILLIAM WALSH 
RICHARD WARD 



PHYLLIS WICGERS 
THOMAS WILDES 
DAAin WOLF 
JOHN YOUNGBERG 



/ PAGE 107 



Third Year 




Medicine 



31 / MARVIN SMITH 

32 / JIM WATTS 

33 / BRUCE SAAL 

34 / CHRIS SKINNER 

35 / DR. HANS WEILL 

36 / PETE GOTH 

37 / MIKE MASCIA 



1 / ARTHUR HADLEY 


11 / BRIAN TRAVIS 


21/ 


2 / BEVERLY MATTHEWS 


12 / CARL SOLOMON 


22/ 


3 / BILL GARRETT 


13 / FRED WOOD 


23/ 


4 / HARRIETTE CLAY 


14 / STUART MAY 


24/ 


5 / KARL KARLSON 


15 / WOODY SANDERS 


25/ 


6 / KEN ROY 


16 / GARY JANKO 


26/ 


7 / HERBERT HENRY 


17 / JOHN TURBA 


27/ 


8 / JOHN DALTON 


18 / GARY HOLT 


28/ 


9 / JOHN COOPER 


19 / ELTON MCAMIS 


20/ 


/ CRAIG MAUMUS 


20 / JOYCE ISAACS 


30/ 



RON CYGAN 
JIM PATTERSON 
PETER MEYERS 
BILLY FRIEDMAN 
LAUREL SCHULTZ 
ANDY SCHWARTZ 
GEORGE FERENCZI 
STAN CARSON 
DONALD MAHONEY 
JOHN HOWE 



MAKIIVG HOUNDS: 
STEPHEN BRINT 
BILL BUFFAT 
DAN DOHERTY 
COLLINS FINNEY 
JAMES JOST 
RICHARD NESS 
P. J. ROSS 
MELVIN SCHULTZ 
GEORGE SMITH 
JAMES WHITE 




PAGE 108 / School of Medicine 



Pediatrics 



EUGENE CARPENTER / 1 

TOM DAVIS / 2 

PETE PROSSER / 3 

LARRY ANGLIN / 4 

PRESLEY JACKSON / 5 

WILLY ORR / 6 

BRENT AIN / 7 

DAVID WRIGHT / 8 

THOMAS WRIGHT / 9 

JACK HOBBS / 10 

LOWELL BAREK / 11 

HOWARD WEISS / 12 

PHIL POTH / 13 

DAVID JARROTT / 14 

BOB ANCIRA / 15 

HAROLD JURAN / 16 

ROGELIO MENENDEZ-CORDOVA / 17 




DAVID MCFARLING / 18 

STAN SMITH / 19 

JOHN STOVER / 20 

LARRY SPRATLING / 21 

STEVE ABSHIRE / 22 

ALVIN AUBRY / 23 

JOE BLINDERMAN / 24 

BILL BUTLER / 25 

JUM HURST / 26 



JOE GARVIA-PRATTS / 27 

DON GALE / 28 

MIKE ZOLLER / 29 

IN THE WARD: 

PAUL BEST 

BONITA CARSON 

JOHN COLEMAN 

HUGO ENGELHARDT 



JEFF GORDON 

JONATHAN LORCH 

ROGER MCCLELLAN 

MADELYN MANNING 

LARRY MATSUMOTO 

TOM MORRIS 

RANDY PARKER 

RON RIEFKOHL 

RON RITCHEY 




/ PAGE 109 



Third Year 




1 / BRUCE PATTERSON 11 / 

2 / DREW LOGUE 12 / 

3 / RANDY BUCHANAN 13 / 

4 / FRED OCHSNER 14 / 

5 / FRANK REED 15 / 

6 / BEN GUIDER 16 / 

7 / RICHARD EPSTEIN 17 / 

8 / JAMES GOODNER 18 / 

9 / ELDA HOGUE 19 / 
10 / LYLE MASON 20 / 



SUSAN BOSTON 21 / 

PAUL GULBAS 22 / 

MILES BRETT 23 / 

FLIP SMITH 24 / 

CALEB HERNDON 25 / 

JAY KRAVITZ 26 / 
MICHAEL MCCLINTON 27 / 

JIM BOOKMAN 28 / 

MICHAEL DESHAZO 29 / 

STEVE SORGEN 30 / 



DAVID PLOTNER 
KEN BREWINGTON 
MIKE MAFFETT 
LESTER MARION 
BILL AUSTIN 
BUDDY PERROTT 
BILL WRIGHT 
JOHN SALISBURY 
TED KLOTH 
BILL BETHEA 



Surgery 



31 / MARK STRAUSS 

32 / RICHARD SMITH 

33 / PHIL MCKINLEY 

34 / BILL TURNER 

35 / CRAIG WINKEL 

36 / JAY MAGGIORE 

37 / BOB HOLZHAUER 

38 / CHRIS ROBINSON 

39 / ALLAN MELMED 

40 / LYNN GREELEY 

41 / DAVID WILENSKY 

42 / BRUCE HUGHES 

43 / FURMAN WALLACE 

44 / DAVID SORENSON 

SCRUBBING UP; 
JOHN BOURGEOIS 
LOUIS JEANSONNE 
DAVID SANDERSON 




PAGE 110 / School of Medicine 









Second 
Year 



1 / BETTY SMITH 

2 / MIKE BOFF 

3 / MARCILLE MAHAN 

4 / BICK FERRYMAN 

5 / ANN FERGUSON 

6 / DAVID ELIZARDI 

7 / CHARLIE JOHNSON 

8 / MARK WARSHAW 

9 / RICHARD SABATIER 

10 / JAMES BERGMAN 

11 / DICK MITCHELL 

12 / JOHN LUBER 

13 / BILL CARRIERE 

14 / ED DAPREMONT 

15 / BOB MILLER 

16 / FRED SCHERT 

17 / PAUL MORRIS 

18 / DAVID HAFT 

19 / ED SHAHEEN 

20 / JOSE PORTUONDO 

21 / BOB RUSSO 

22 / VINCENTE LAGO 

23 / BRITT WEST 

24 / JOHN GURDIN 

25 / IRVING JOHNSON 

26 / RENNIE CULVER 

27 / JOHN SIMMONS 

28 / MARK AVERBUCH 

29 / JIM CHANGUS 

30 / BILL CLARK 

31 / TOMMY HAWK 

32 / HOWARD MOORE 

33 / ELLIOTT COULD 

34 / MAURICE NASSER 

35 / HOWARD MILLER 



36 / GARY GOLDBARD 71 / 

37 / JOE DALOVISIO 72 / 

38 / TERRY HABIG 73 / 

39 / GARY MAYES 74 / 

40 / BILL GARTH 75 / 

41 / JIM NUNLEY 76 / 

42 / GARY MORRISON 77 / 

43 / PAT PERKINS 78 / 

44 / JAMES JOHNSTON 79 / 

45 / JOHN WELLS 80 / 

46 / CRAIG KESSLER 81 / 

47 / CHARLES O'MARA 82 / 

48 / JOE MCCRARY 83 / 

49 / JEAN JEW 84 / 

50 / MARSHALL SCHREEDER 85 / 

51 / DAVID DUNN 86 / 

52 / CHUCK STEWART 87 / 

53 / DAVTD BROMBERG 88 / 

54 / LESSA PHILLIPS 89 / 

55 / BILL RASKIN 90 / 

56 / BROBSON LUTZ 91 / 

57 / HARRY CREEKMORE 92 / 

58 / DICK WOOD' 93 / 

59 / BOB BASS 94 / 

60 / BILL REED 95 / 

61 / CATHY SAMPLES 96 / 

62 / PAUL CAMPBELL 97 / 

63 / GEORGE DESORMEAUX 98 / 

64 / NICHOLAS SELF 99 / 

65 / JOEL COHEN 100 / 

66 / JOHN SAARI 101 / 

67 / BOB GRIFFITH 102 / 

68 / WARREN HAGAN 103 / 

69 / RICK CALVIN 104 / 

70 / NICK PETRELLI 105 / 



BOB CUMMINGS 

GLEN LIBBY 

RON WENDER 

MONTE IKEMIRE 

JOHN HOBART 

ED LAYNE 

BOB RYCHLY 

LARRY MAZZOTTA 

JOHN MARTIN 

JOHN WINTER 

BOB TOFTE 

PETER RABIN 

BILL HOCKING 

ART CHANG 

BILL RAWLINGS 

BRENT JOSEPH 

JANET YOUNG 

TERRY MARKS 

BOB HOSEA 

KENNY SMITH 

KEN MULLEN 

ARNOLD FINKELMAN 

JOEL ROSENBERG 

BOB BLANKENSHIP 

DON ROSENBLUM 

MIKE RAIFE 

DAVID LUBIN 

ULLA JO ULE 

ROBERT FREEDMAN 

PETE LEVINE 

HAL ROSENBLATT 

TOM HARPER 

TONY NG 

CRAYTON CIBOROWSKI 

MONTY BELL 



106 / RICHARD AIBHART 

107 / VIRGINIA WILLIAMS 

108 / MARTIN EVANS 
109 /bill OLSON 
110/ JEFF LAU 

111 /tom steffen 

112 /adrian dean 

113 / cuff crafton 
114/ joe hobton 

115 / craig colman 

116 / bruce iteld 

117 /donlacrone 

118 /ED lUFF 

119/ JAMES LABORDE 

120 / JIM AVERS 

121 / TOM GWMSTAD 

122 / GREER MCHETSON 

123 / BARRY NAGEL 

124 / MIKE MOSER 

125 / BOB TANNER 

126 / RICHARD BRINNER 

127 / JEFF MABMELZAT 

128 / RICK LUKASH 

129 / DAVID BOUBHEAUX 

130 / ANN LOVITT 

131 / MIKE FITZSIMMONS 

132 / ROCKY KENT 

133 / DWIGHT LEE 

134 / JIM WEAVER 

135 / PAULINA ROGNONI 
OFF FAEX HUNTING: 
STEVE HENSON 

BILL LONG 

BOB MERIWETHER 

MIKE VOLSKY 




/ PACE 111 



PAGE 112 / School of Medicine 



First 
Year 





Second 
Year 



1 / PAUL HUNT 

2 / ART MCLEAN 

3 / ALTON HOMEBO 

4 / GEORGE HOFFMAN 

5 / JAY BOHN 

6 / VAN DAVroSON 

7 / JIM OWEN 

8 / MICHAEL GOLDBEBG 

9 / BONALD WYCHE 

10 / MOBBIS MANN 

11 / STEVEN TAYLOB 

12 / HAHVEY MARICE 

13 / MIKE HUNT 

14 / HENRYNNE LOUDEN 

15 / COBDON HEALEY 

16 / W. R. COLLIE 

17 / DAVID CABNEB 

18 / PAUL PACE 

19 / SHEBBY BBAHENY 

20 / C. B. SKINNEB 

21 / KEBMIT WALTEBS 

22 / DAVID MCLAIN 

23 / BICHARD OTTS 

24 / WILLIAM CALDWELL 

25 / MICHAEL TOOKE 

26 / MICHAEL MCFADDEN 

27 / JIM BEAN 

28 / HEATHER BUTLER 

29 / DENNIS SUICH 

30 / J. E. JOHNSON 

31 / CAROL TIPTON 

32 / KENNETH GORDON 

33 / ROBERT BAXTEB 

34 / THOMAS HOWABD 

35 / LABBY OSBUBN 

36 / PAT DOLAN 

37 / STEVE HEABD 



38 / LOUIS MOBGAN 

39 / JIM FLOBEY 

40 / EBMAN RAWLINCS 

41 / JOHN MEYEB 

42 / DENNIS BADEMACHEB 

43 / GEBBY DEFRAITES 

44 / JOHN EICK 

45 / IRA UDELL 

46 / MIKE LUNDY 

47 / BOB CALDWELL 

48 / BBUCE SAMUELS 

49 / HANNAH CLABK 

50 / MITCHEL THABIT 

51 / STEVE BAHOU 

52 / WHITNEY BEADEB 

53 / CHABLES SIMONSON 

54 / BALPH ASBUBY 

55 / HENBY KWONC 

56 / TOM WATSON 

57 / JANICE BLUMENTHAL 

58 / CANDICE BOHB 

59 / BOD BABNHABDT 

60 / STEVE HABBISON 

61 / JIM MUBPHY 

62 / STANLEY WATSON 

63 / GBETA HERMAN 

64 / ART FOUGNER 

65 / ROBERT CLARK 

66 / CRAIG FERBELL 

67 / BICHABD STBOBACK 

68 / ABTHUB GBEEN 

69 / DAN JACOB 

70 / BOB FLANDBY 

71 / LEE WINELAND 

72 / ACE JONES 

73 / J. p. ELLISON 

74 / BOBERT JEFFERS 



75 / STEVEN KLEIN 

76 / CHABLIE FISCHMAN 

77 / LABBY BARNES 

78 / TOM REED 

79 / MIKE KELLY 

80 / E. K. BLYTHE 

81 / EBIC GEWOLB 

82 / BILL LACOBTE 

83 / MABK STEIN 

84 / JAMES COOK 

85 / MICHAEL MCDONALD 

86 / DAVID OLSON 

87 / EUGENIA GABY 

88 / PAUL CATBOU 

89 / MICHAEL HICGINS 

90 / MARTHA SLATER 

91 / DOUG WAGNER 

92 / CAROL DUNN 

93 / STEPHEN HARRIS 

94 / LELAN SILLIN 

95 / JUDY CIOLITTO 

96 / STUABT AGBEN 

97 / STOKES DICKINS 

98 / STEPHEN HOBWITZ 

99 / BABBABA DENAIS 

100 / JOE MARNELL 

101 / DON FISICHELLA 

102 / VICTOR GARCIA-PRATS 

103 / PHILLIP KELLY 

104 / ROBERT CABD 

105 / DAVID ABBOTT 

106 / PAUL ZELNICK 

107 / BOB PATYBAK 

108 / MIKE WILENSKY 

109 / BBUCE WALLACE 

110 / BICHARD SILVER 
111/ LOUIS BONITA 



112 / ED SPITZ 

113 / FRED JACQUES 

1 14 / J AN KAUFMAN 

115 / MARC ARMSTBONG 

116 / LINDA KESSLER 

117 / JASON SMITH 

118 / STANLEY LEONG 
119/ STEVE SOTMAN 

120 / JUD SHELLITO 

121 / JOSEPH LOCICEBO 

122 / SAM WATERS 

123 / BICHABD PABKINSON 

124 / ANDY CAHTEB 

125 / BAND SPENCEB 

126 / BARBY SIMON 

127 / JAYNE GUBTLEB 

128 / ARNOLD SPANJERS 

129 / RICH WESTFAL 

130 / GEORGE RODCERS 

131 / KIRK BELLAKD 

132 / TRAVIS KENNY 

133 / JOHN HESS 

134 / GARY SANDER 

135 / GENE BOSENBEBG 

CADAVER BALL CASUALTIES: 
NICHOLAS CAMPO 
WILLIAM COLEMAN 
MABGABET GUSTAFSON 
STEPHEN HARBISON 
JOHN HUDNALL 
NEIL MANOWITZ 
CHABLES PERBINE 
KAL SHWABTS 
LAWBENCE VINIS 
PATBICIA WEBSTEB 
GEOFFREY WIEDEMAN 




First 
Year 



PAGE 114 / Lodges 



Alpha Delta Pi 




1-7 / SEVEN LITTLE DWARFS 

8 / CORIE FRANTZ 

9 / JANE BETTS 

10 / LAUREL MALOWNEY 

11 / MEGAN KELLY 

12 / MARGARET MILLER 

13 / KAREN SMITH 

14 / JOAN JACKSON 

15 / CINDY ECKERT 

16 / SARAH MINARD 

17 / JOANNA PESSA 

18 / CATHY BOUDREAUX 

19 / ELAINE NODEN 

20 / MARY ADORE COLONEY 

21 / BETZIE PEPPO 

22 / JUDY MOFFITT 

23 / DEBBIE SABALOT 

24 / KAREN ABBOTT 

25 / JEANNE COLEMAN 

26 / JEAN BUETTNER 

27 / LINDA HELMAN 

28 / JANET TAYLOR 

29 / PAT DAVENPORT 

30 / BECKY DOZIER 

31 / BUTCH GOLDENSTAR 



PAGE 116 / Lodges 




§ ^ 



w.. ^-^ 



^p^.^^ 


11 


Wl ' 


M 


^ — 1 






M 


^IPI^% 


IP 


K-:: . «, 


iBv 


^^m 


■:^ 



.-^^t 



v^/ 



I 



I 







1 / BETH MAXWELL 

2 / EDIE PEPPER 

3 / VICKI KEIKES 

4 / ELLEN FRIEDMAN 

5 / MARILYN BERNSTEIN 

6 / MARLENE ESKIND 

7 / SUSAN FORSYTH 

8 / DERBY KLEIN 

9 / CINDY COHEN 
10 / STEPHIE FRIEFIELD 

11 /DEBBIE GOLDSTEIN 

12 / PAM TITLE 

13 / BLAINE LEGUM 

14 / PAULA SHAPIRO 

15 / ARLENE TORBIN 
16 / RUTH SHAPIRO 

17 / LOUISE WOLF 

18 / KAY SAMPSON 

19 / ILENE DOBROW 

20 / ELLEN GOLD 

21 / DEE ALTFATER 

22 / SHERRY' ZOX 

23 / PAM FRANK 
24 / CAROL HERMAN 

25 / PAULA WEXLER 

26 / VICKI SAMUELS 

27 / LINDA KRAMER 

28 / LIZ FINK 

29 / TRICIA RICH 

30 / PATTI RICHARD 

31 / JOAN ROSENFELS 

32 / PAT PRINS 

33 / IRENE CALDWELL 

34 / JUDY ROSS 

35 / PATSY FRIEDLER 

36 / MARSHA FLANZ 

37 / CAROL LAVIN 

38 / CAROLYN LIPSON 

39 / LINDA SAUL 

ELSEWHERE : 

DALE BARKEN 

MINDY' BARRAR 

BARBARA BRIN 

SHELLEY' DORFMAN 

FILLIS GERSON 

JANET GETZ 

BARBARA GINSBERG 

SUSAN GOLDFADEN 

BETTY GORDON 

SARALYN JACOBSON 

MADELON JAFFE 

MELANIE KUSIN 

BETH MARX 

JOAN MICHELSON 

JANE MOOS 

MARGO MORET 

PEGGY MORRISON 

CISSY PASS 

SHARON PEARLINE 

ELLEN ROSENBLOOM 

SUE SALZ 

PATSY SEWEL 

BRUCIE SILVERMAN 

PEGGY STEINE 

CAROL STONE 

SUSAN WAGNER 

DIANE WALKER 

RIKI WEINSTEIN 

CONNIE WERNER 

SUSAN WEXLER 



Alpha Epsilon Phi 




Lodges / page 119 



I 



Alpha Omicron Pi 



24 



12.6 



20 



1-5 



'30 



22. 



16 





K 


^ 


• L 






/ 




r 





^1§^ 



N 



Xv 



cy 



^^^ 



1 / PETER PONTCHARTRAIN 

2 / TOMMY TWO-LANE 

3 / ANDY AUDUBON 

4 / FRANCES PAPPAS 

5 / TOMMY 

6 / BETH FOUTS 

7 / MIKE SCHAUB 

8 / FLORA EUSTIS 

9 / KAREN MANEMANN 

10 / KAY WARR 

11 / LISA HALL 

12 / JOAN KING 

13 / MIKE 

14 / LINDA GURTLER 

15 / NAN LANDRY 

16 / BETSY KEYS 

17 / CATHY GRIFFIS 

18 / GEORGE 

19 / ADELE SALZER 

20 / CHERYL PALERMO 

21 / KATHY SCHNEIDAU 

22 / LESLIE LEWIS 

23 / AMY KNIGHT 

24 / STEPHANIE TWILBECK 

25 / PRIS MIMS 

26 / SUZANNE TAYLOR 

27 / VIRGINIA SCHNEIDAU 

28 / MARTHA SELLERS 

29 / LEAH STRAUB 

30 / BRUCIE CORNELL 

31 / DIANE RYAN 

32 / SUSAN VAN HART 

33 / GWEN HAGER 

34 / COLLEEN MUNDS 

35 / BETH SINGLETON 

SOMEWHERE ELSE: 
JAN GONZALES 
LINDA GONZALES 
KATHLEEN LAMBERT 
GUSSIE MORRIS 



PAGE 120 / Lodges 



^ '4 






-'^'^ -^^^ 



It" 



'K^ 


I^^BgjSI ^ili 





F««« ^ 



1! .J-. 



-> 



F 



y 



\ 



1 / MIKE HICKOK 

2 / STEVE REILLY 

3 / DAVE MARTIN 
4 / DAVID PEREZ 

5 / JIM REED 

6 / GEORGE MCGOWIN 

7 / PHIL DEPP 

8 / TIM FRECH 

9 / DAVID C.ASTANON 

10 / MIKE JAMES 

11 / ART PAULINA 

12 / JOHN MARKHAM 

13 / BERT TURNER 

14 / ROCK PAULL 

15 / JACK BURKETT 

16 / JOHN PEMBERTON 

17 / GARRY LARSEN 

18 / TOM ALLISON 

19 / GLEN GREINER 

20 / BOB LACLEDE 

21 / KEITH PYBURN 

22 / DICK SALKIN 

23 / FRED SCHLESINGER 

24 / DAVE EBERT 

25 / KYLE DENNIS 

26 / ROB PETERSON 

27 / PHIL DOMINGUEZ 

28 / CHARLIE SNOW 

29 / LEONARD BROWN 

30 / CHARLES RUARK 

31 / SID FARMER 

32 / FARCH ANDERSON 

33 / SAM ROBINSON 

34 / CHICK CALDWELL 

35 / ALEX ASHY 

36 / GLENN ABEL 

OUT BACK: 

JIM AITIN 

JEFF AYCOCK 

DAVE BEI.LVMY 

MIKE COLLINS 

TO>I GREY 

MAC HYMAN 

DAY JIMENEZ 

DENNIS K\SIATI VN 

MILES KEHOE 

RAY KINNFY 

HIM, KLEIN 

JOHN KRl PSKY 

WAYNE I.OI.AN 

JERRY MCGLOTHLEN 

KENNY MCNEIL 

FRED MONTERl BIO 

JAY SHAI K.ri 

BOB WHITEMVN 



Alpha Sigma Phi 




Lodges / page 123 



Beta Theta Pi 




1 / WOODIE 

2 / RICHARD ATWOOD 

3 / DAVID FLOWERE 

4 / CHUCK BRENT 

5 / MILES PRATT 

6 / MORGAN JONES 

7 / GEORGE LARSEN 

8 / CHARLES HARRISON 

9 / HARRY QUARLLS 

10 / BOB MCKINNON 

11 / MARK BADGER 

12 / DAVID SYMS 

13 / JIM WILBERT 

14 / YAT COLOMB 

15 / JOHN MCCUTCHEN 

16 / NICK POWELL 

17 / JOHN DOWELL 

18 / BOB MYERS 

19 / RICK RICHDUX 

20 / THOM FRANKLIN 

21 / JIM REES 

22 / JIM GOODLAD 

23 / DOC MEHURIN 

24 / CY BOWERS 

ABSENT: 

RICK DRUMMOND 

NED HEMARD 

CHUCK MCGEE 

LOUIS GURVICH 

SPARKIE 

STEVE VONBEVRON 

RICHARD WEINBERG 

WOOGLIN 



PAGE 124 / Lodges 



,:-?^. 







\\ 




^ m 



'^^\ 




X 




^v 




f 



.>~i!!^ 



^fr' : 



■■«*•* 



■^' 



^ 



^^^ 








^^▼>. 



;^^%.' 


















%;->vv.;^'^. 




'4 





1 / DALE DANE 

2 / CANDY ROSS 

3 / C;WEN GARNER 

4 / NANCY HALL 

5 / SrSAN DORSEY' 

6 / .lANIE AFFOLTER 

7 / <;k«)R«;e ann iiayne 

8 / deidre white 

9 / karen russi 

10 / tricia hopkins 

11/ kit lozes 

12 / SrZANNE LE BLANC 

13 / NEIL ANN ARMSTRONG 

14 / CAROLYN NELSON 

15 / HOLLY EARL 

16 / ANN BOIDREAUX 

17 / LESLIE ALBERTINE 

18 / MARGIE BOOKER 

19 / BETH WEBER 

20 / SHARON CARRIGAN 

21/ SALLY SIMPSON 

22 / ANDREA RICARDS 

23 / DANIELLE Dl'TREY 

24 / KATHY PLAICHE 

25 / BETTY MILES 

26 / BECCA ODOM 

27 / MARY CARRIGAN 

28 / CATHERINE HAGAMAN 

29 / SALLIE SCANLAN 

30 / LAN DE GENERES 
31 / DONNA DICKSON 

32 / BECKY RAY 

33 / PATTY ADKINS 

34 / MIMSEY FITZPATRICK 

35 / MARTHA DOVER 

36 / O. B. O'BRIEN 

37 / B. B.'S BOYFRIEND 

38 / MIMI METHVIN 

MISSING IN ACTION: 

GAIL ADAMS 

MARIDEL ALLEN 

LOGAN BYRNE 

CRAIG CHRISTENSEN 

MOLLY DANIEL 

MIMI DOSSETT 

PAGE ELMORE 

NOEL ENGOMEN 

INDIA FLEMING 

KATHY FREY 

BARBARA HALL 

JANET HEVTHEHWICK 

ITNDA HI<;«;iNS 

MEB JACKSON 

SL'SAN KAHI.MIS 

KATHY KNOPH 

KATY KOSTKA 

LICY U\NE 

sally lines 

tibby penn 

«;ail perry 

bobbi petersen 

mary beth plaiche 



KATHY POSEY 

JACZIE RAMEY 

KATHY ROSS 

PEGE STERNBERGER 

MISSY TENCH 

CHRIS TRAXLER 

MARY' MARGARET TRAXLER 

CARRIE VINCENT 

VANNA WARMACK 

CANDY WEGENHOFT 

DIANE WINGO 

BARRY WINN 

SYLVIA YOUNG 



Chi Omega 




Lodges / page 127 



f ^^ 



W^'^- 






MM 









iO«-i, 




hS V 




^ 


SS9 






■ 














^« 


^^— -U 


*^'-|H- 


i 




vi^Nfl 




PJH 




■HMjy^y^ 


iMkM 


mr 




"iKi fl 


0(V ■,■--. - 




— 




«:'.,a 


El 


Li: 


.SIM*- 


.y L,^ 


' 




Mk.'. -fl 




^B~-_ 


-w- 




^KB ~ K ' 






ml 




■ : 




"^ ^fiT^. 


S-l 






am i"W 


■ 


■ 

'St.rr-itea 


B 


B 


■ 


r 


■J 






^i^H^H^^HS^^^^^^^^^^E 






.■^«#w««^a 



1 / STEVE GILMER 

2 / CHARLIE IMONTGOIVIERY 

3 / ROBBIE FAUST 

4 / BILLY GRACE 

5 / DAVID L'HOSTE 

6 / ALAN SEWART 

7 / HARDY RICHARDSON 

8 / JOHN KANE 

9 / WILLIE WHITE 

10 /ANN 

11 / SPARKY WELLES 

12 / DAVID FAUST 

13 / GORDON GSELL 

14 / JOHN DANE 

15 / ROBIN PUNCHES 

16 / RITA 

17 / BOB VORHOFF 

18 / DORA 

19/ ANDY EDWARDS 

20 / GEORGE RIVIERE 

21 / INDIA 

22 / BILLY' WYNN 

23 / STEVE FORRESTER 

24 / JOHN CROSBY 

25 / BILL BRUNDIGE 

26 / OSCAR GWIN 

27 / DAVID WILLIAMS 

28 / CHARLIE MACKIE 

29 / RICHARD HAEUSER 

30 / PETER ASMUTH 

31 / COP PEREZ 

32 / CALVIN JONES 

33 / SONNY SHIELDS 

34 / CHARLIE MILLER 

ON LEA^I: 

CARL ANDRY 

DINKY AITENREITH 

TEDDY BARKEKDING 

STAN DENEGRE 

JACK DENIS 

DAVID DE(;RI!Y 

JO JOACHIM 

SANDY LOWE 

HANK LONG 

BAHHY ■VIAKRY 

BILL M ALLOY 

FERNANDO SANCHEZ 

CI RT SEH'ART 

RIC THISTLE-THWAITE 



Delta Kappa Epsilon 




Lodges / page 129 



Delta Tau Delta 




1 / JOHN BAEHR 
2 / JOHN MAHONEY 
3 / DON SHARP 
4/ BOB LEE 

5 / DAVID WALKER 

6 / PETE EMIGH 

7 / BRUCE DANNER 
8 / STEVE DANNER 

9 / DANNY MCDANIELS 

10 / BILL PETERSON 

11 / BUDDY ERASER 

12 / JIM BARNTHOUSE 

13 / DON FREEMAN 

14 / DOUG MILLER 

15 / PETE KWIATKOW^SKI 

16 / RICK CALCOTE 

17 / GORDON STONE 

18 / BILL FONES 

19 / RON NEV^'TON 

A.W.O.L.: 
HANK BARTON 
DAVE BATT 
JOE BOAZ 

MILLARD BOSWORTH 
PAUL CROV*^ 
DAVID DOLKART 
KIM FROSELL 
TOM HAYDEN 
BOB IRVINE 
LEE MOWE 
LLOYD MUTTER 
EDDIE PRATT 
TOM VAN BUSKIRK 
DAVID WELLEN 
SONNY WHEELAHAN 



PAGE 130 / Lodges 










^,<,-.^,.iM»»y.«yg:ssaiiJy' W i j. ii VTi-taaift i 



1936 




i/» -J* 



,^- 



X 



' f 




W. 


iitl 


r?" 


.' 1 


m 


ti»*i 


• • 

• • 




In 


■ c 




P 


'. 1 


6 




•»- - - ^!|l ^ 


^^jr 


■*;- 


« 






Kappa Alpha 



1 / CHRIS R. SHERIDAN 

2 / CHUCK WICKSTROM 

3 / ROCKY ROCKSTROH 

4 / JIM LANE 

5 / LITTLE WILLIE 

6 / CHRIS WHITTY 

7 / JACK DAMPF 

8 / WESLEY DOBRS 

9 / OMER DAVIS 

10 / JIM FULLER 

11 / HOOPER NICHOLS 

12 / JOHN PAUL FLEMING 

13 / RICHARD FOSTER 

14 / SEWELL ELLIOTT 

15 / TATHAM HERTZBERG 

16 / CRIS BENTON 

17 / JOE SCHWARTZEL 

18 / VIRGIL FOX 

19 / BERRY THOMPSON 

20 / JIMMY SHEATS 

21 / MARSHALL ORDERMANN 

22 / MEADE GRIGC 

23 / CLARK CROMWELL 

24 / RANDY SMITH 

25 / JOE HENDRIX 

26 / SCOTTY MILHAS 

27 / BILL WEBSTER 

28 / RUSS NOLAN 

THUANT: 

BOB BIRTEL 

BUDDY BLUE 

TOM CROSBY 

JOHN DAVIS 

TOM FABACHER 

PANCHO FLEMING 

WARD HOWARD 

BRET LEBRETON 

RANDY LEWIS 

KING LOGAN 

DIXSON "MONTAi.UE 

EDDIE ORDERMANN 

DICKIE POL< HON 

BEN SLATER 

CHRIS STEG 

RICK TAMPl.IN 

ROLY VON KUUNATOWSKI 

BILL WIIK.VT 




Lodges / page 133 



Kappa Alpha Theta 




1 / EMMY BARNES 

2 / HEATHER WIGGINS 

3 / MARILYN MILLWEE 
4 / FANNY 

5 / CHRIS 

6 / JANE ZIMMERMAN 

7 / JANIE PARTIN 

8 / ANNE MULLER 

9 / JENNIFER JAMES 

10 / KAREN HEAUSLER 

11 / MARGO STOWERS 

12 / MARTHA CAMPBELL 

13 / CATHY SMALL 

14 / BARB DICKSON 

15 / ANNE PACKER 

16 / MARTHA AZAR 

17 / LYNNE TORBERT 

18 / BONNIE BRYAN 

19 / NANCY CASSADY 

20 / CATHY CLARK 

21 / PEGGY DILLON 

22 / SUSIE FRERE 

23 / BETH EXUM 

24 / CRICKETT MOORE 

25 / SUE SIMONTON 

26 / SUELLEN NIXON 

27 / BUSS PACKER 

28 / PATTY HOUSER 

29 / BETTY DILLON 

30 / OZ HANSEN 

31 / PAT BOYLSTON 

32 / SALLY NETTLETON 

33 / ALICIA LEONARD 

34 / PEGGY BARNES 

35 / BETH SMITH 

36 / TREVI PEARSON 

37 / LIZ WETZEL 

38 / MARY SCHOENBERGER 

39 / LEILA PERRIN 

MISSING: 

PEGGY ABRAHAM 

CLAUDETTE CAMPBELL 

JANE CHAPMAN 

MARY MARGARET COURT 

DERRY HILL 

MARTHA JORDY 

ANN KAPLAN 

KAREN LAUTZ 

LORY LOCKWOOD 

JOANNA LOMBARD 

CAROL PIPER 

DONNA SHERLOCK 

KATIE SMITH 

GLESE VERLANDER 

LAURELLE VERLANDER 

MELINDA WEST 

MINTA ZULKY 



PAGE 134 / Lodges 



|HHIH 


k 


1 


m n 









«^' 





»^, 






^ 



^ 






^:s; 



'^i 



i 



-A>1 



M 



0^n 




•»//-< 






# -^ . > 




I / BETH CHILDRESS 
2 / JANICE KILLEBREW 

3 / SCOTTY SPAAR 

4/ KARIN SWENSON 

5 / CATHY DALTON 

6 / ANN LEWIS 

7 / JULIA WEBB 

8 / MARTHA SCHULL 

9 / JENNY JACKSON 

10 / BEV ANDERSON 

II / TERRY TERRILL 
12 / KATHY ELLIOT 

13 / LUCY VAN METER 

14 / PAM PARKER 

15 / PAULA PERRONE 

16 / CINDY' AVEGMANN 

17 / REGAN ALFORD 

18 / MARY UMLAND 
19 / SUZANNE HAYT)EN 

20 / MARY' MARTHA CURD 

21 / SHIRLEY PRATT 

22 / SUSAN BRADLEY 

23 / MARTHA SANDERS 

24 / ROSIE MCCABE 

25 / DEBBIE HEABERLIN 

26 / PATSY' MATHIEU 

27 / PEACHY' CLARK 

28 / BOBBIE LAWRENCE 

29 / BARBARA GOTT 

30 / KREIS BAILEY 

31 / JANET WALLER 

32 / LU ANTHONY' 

33 / DIANA FOX 

34 / SIDNEY' GOODRICH 

35 / BOBBIE PROVOSTY 
36 / MARCIA PROSSER 

37 / LAURA WHITNEY 

38 / BRIDGET BRADLEY 

39 / ALICE HOLLER 

40 / CHRIS HEABERLIN 

41 / MARY LOIS SCOFIELD 

42 / JOANIE CLONINGER 

CLOSET CASES: 

JOAN ARBOUR 

KATIE BENTON 

CHARLOTTE BEYER 

SUSAN BROWN 

BETSY CAMPBELL 

TRICIA CARLOCK 

COURTNEY' CURTIS 

JEANNIE DOWLING 

KATHY HALBOWER 

ELLEN HANCKEL 

JUDY' HOWARD 

SALLY HOWELL 

LY'NNE JOHNSTON 

LANA KILLGORE 

SARAH LATHAM 

GAY' LEBRETON 

LIBBY MAHORNER 

PEGGY MANNING 



ALICE MARQUEZ 

MUFFIN MAYER 

BARRY MCGAHEY 

MARCIA MORTENSON 

PATTY' NEALON 

DONNA PIERCE 

SHELLY' SCOTT 

JANIE STONE 

GIN TAYLOR 

SUSAN TUCKER 

DEBBIE WILLIAMS 

BETSY WHITTEY 



Kappa Kappa Gamma 




Lodges / page 13' 



Kappa Sigma 




1 / JACK NAFTEL 

2 / STEVE NEWMAN 
3 / STEVE KORBECKI 

4 / JOHN ERNST 

5 / RON BERNEL 

6 / BOB COHEN 

7 / JOHN HANKINS 

8 / MERRILL BROWN 

9 / BOB MCBRIDE 
10 / JOHN NELHOFF 
11/ GERRY GATO 

12 / ROBERT OLIVIER 

13 / STEVE VOSS 

14 / CHRIS HALL 

15 / STRETCH LEWIS 

16 / SKIP FALGOUT 

17 / ANGELO MATTALINA 

18 / STEVE SALMON 

19 / BOB NIEMERA 

20 / JACK LABORDE 

21 / BAIRD ARCHBALD 

22 / MIKE CALDWELL 

23 / JERRY SKINNER 

24 / PETE OLIVIER 

25 / JIM WITHERSPOON 

26 / RICH.ARD GRIFFIN 

27 / STEVE SHULTZ 

28 / FRED MARTIN 

29 / BRUCE GRIMES 

30 / CHRIS THOMPSON 

31 / CHIP DEWITT 

32 / DAN KIESLING 

33 / PEPE SAAVADERA 

34 / JOEY FAVALORO 

LOST: 

JOE BL'LLARD 
STL CLARK 
PAT DIAL 
TERRY EDWARDS 
ROBERT FLEMING 
JOE GENDRON 
SCOTT HEAPE 
SCOTT KAUFMAN 
DAVID KNOX 
STEVE MARCELLO 
NICK MUSSO 
JOHN MUTZIGER 
DOUG ROBINSON 
JIM THOMPSON 
KEVIN WALSH 



PAGE 138 / Lodges 



^^^^^^^^^^H 


^^^^^HH^ 




r- 




— i 










-% 






-J 


■■- 


1 






"^ 1 






1 






n 






li 







1^ 



^. 



.4 



— '^ 




\&i 




w 






i 


m 


-X- — 


: 




. .^^ 


■•*.T 


-t 


O '^-^ 


■1 


mm. 


A 


Wm. 


n 


m 



^ ^ Su^ r 



^•if- 






\ 



- .^1 



-^fe*:«jli/ii^? 



V. 



> J 



p»«»l 







-4 






ti^l>01 



afc=r ? 


•^'if^^KjiJM 






■Tm^f^ 


i^fotM^ 


— '3?^ 


r-'\ 


"^ 


r%J 



^ 



;!;? 



I - 




■ • I — . 



m 







jfD'jumvWf 



INN 





'S 






ll 



ifri 




i-^^ 
















■■-v'^< 






■"^^^; 



m 



">^- 






.^-Cf'.- ■ 






* 



■■>i:v^ 





Phi Kappa Sigma 



1 / ED FEUILLE 

2 / GLENN HELTON 

3 / RAY MOON 

4 / CLIFF CAMP 

5 / PETE GRIFFIS 

6 / BILL PRATT 

7 / TOM KENNA 

8 / SANDY WRAY 

9 / JERRY KEEL 

10 / HERB VALLON 

11 / LEE ROGERS 

12 / CHUCK MCKIRRIHAN 

13 / JOHN BRADLEY 

14 / ALAN LAX 

15 / john mccarron 

16 / tom pounds 

17 / jeremy belong 

18 / leo varlander 

19 / bob wiggins 

20 / ducky riess 
21 / john kirchner 

22 / clark dur,vnt 

23 / david wade 

24 / randy pick 
25 / kim podkulski 

26 / steve faller 
27 / dickie feuille 

28 / david fabre 

29 / pan arvites 
30 / alex cunningham 

31 / rob oklesian 

32 / dean switzer 

33 / curt jurgens 
34 / :mark holt 

35 / john beatty 

36 / lke bruner 

37 / chris heinrichs 

38 / mark lassiter 

LACKING: 

JACK BONNER 

BEN BROWN 

CARL FOSTER 

BILL GORDON 

JIM >ic<:ready 

REGGIE MORE 
ARTIE RASKIN 




Lodges / pace 141 



Phi Mu 




1 / JANE PEELER 

2 / DEBBIE HERRING 

3 / PHYLL NUGENT 

4 / DENISE CASSENS 

5 / MARY MEREDITH 

6 / MILLIE PILIE 

7 / LILI HOWARD 

8 / WENDY KORNEGAY 
9 / KAREN MEADOR 

10 / ANN RUDOLPH 

11 / SUSAN NILES 

12 / ANN CARTER VADEN 

13 / LYNNE MARTIN 

14 / JUSTINE TALLY 

15 / CAMILLE ROGERS 

16 / CURRIE OVERBY 

17 / IBBY PARKS 

18 / JAN SHANHOUSE 

19 / SUZANNE BARRERE 

20 / LYNN LEHNHARDT 

21 / GINNY KIMZEY 

22 / LISETTE HAYS 

23 / BETSY MARSAL 

24 / SUSAN ROZANSKI 

25 / GAY SIMMONS 

26 / KELLY JACKSON 

27 / lONE WHITLOCK 

28 / LYNNE SCHWOTZER 

29 / NANCY KERN 

30 / TAMARA VANNOY 

31 / NOREL TULLIER 

32 / BONNIE MOULTON 

33 / MAUREEN WALSH 

34 / DOROTHY KEENAN 

35 / GAIL BAROUDI 

36 / ANNA WADE 

37 / BECKY REY 

38 / LYNN LANDRUM 

39 / MARIANNE LIPSCOMBE 

40 / KATHY' TOMBERLIN 

41 / EMILY STEVENS 

42 / CATHY TERRY 

43 / BEAU BOOZER 

NOT PRESENT: 
MICHELE ASMUTH 
HELEN BAILEY 
Z. BOURGEOIS 
SUSAN COOKE 
GWEN DAVIDSON 
JANE DOVITH (JYA) 
BARBARA ENSENAT 
NANCY ESCHETTE 
GENI MERRITT 
ANN METRAILER 
STEPHANIE RAGLAND 
SARAH RICHTER 
ROMA SIMMONS 
KATHY SLOCOMBE (JYA) 
LINDA STINNET 
PATTY WATSON (JYA) 
ALICE WILBERT 
NANCY WILLIAMSON 
LINDA WOODSON 



PAGE 142 / Lodges 



11! 





z^^^w 



't'A^^-tr 






♦ • /> f r. . ^^.-^ 



/ 



r's-ii 






;? f^. 



1^ "^i 



r> ' 



1 



»>. 



-m^ 



\~.-~- ^ :?C£f 



^ 



^ki 



L<^i 



l<55>. 






1 / CATHY NELSON 
2 / ANNE TALHOT 
3 / LISA nENNETT 
4 / >IARY ANN DAY 
5 / SUGAR COKINGS 
6 / MARCIA BENNETT 
7 / ELLEN CARTER 
8 / KAREN CONLEY' 
9 / KATHY TEMPLETON 
10 / KATHY' FERGUSON 
11/ MARY MCKINNEY 
12 / JEANIE EACAN 
13 / RECKY' WHITTEN 
14 / IRENE BRIEDE 
15 / CARMEN CRAMER 
16 /KIM HARRIS 
17 / MARY HELEN POWELL 
18 / BETH LEWIS 
19 / MARY MARTIN 
20 / TRICIA RAMSEY 
21 / BOBBIE MAXWELL 
22 / TRUDY CROW 
23 / DEBBY GADDY 
24 / BETH GADDY' 
25 / TONI OWEN 
26 / JAN SHIPMAN 
27 / DEBIE LONG 
28 / ERAN PICKENS 
29 / JOAN MCMULLEN 
30 / JOAN POWELL 
31 / LOU ANNA COOTS 
32 / SALLY JOHNSON 
33 / MARY ELLEN WALLACE 
34 / SUZY FIFE 
35 / SUSALEE NORRIS 
36 / RANDI ECHOLS 
37 / MARY' PLAUCHE 
38 / SHARON DALOVISIO 
38 / TRICIA SAMMONS 
40 / ANNE STRACHAN 
41 / BARBAR.V BARNARD 
42 / KATHY JOHNSON 
43 / ANNIE SANCHEZ 
44 / DIANE SANDERSON 
45 / MARY RICKARD 
46 / PAM IVIONAST 
47 / DANA ROBINSON 
48 / GAIL PRATT 
49 / ISABEL JUNCO 
50 / ELEONORE LEAVITT 

UNDISCERNIBLE: 

STEPHANIE ARTHUR 

NANCY BACKUS 

BEVERLY BENNETT 

TERRY BOS WELL 

SUSIE BROWN 

COURTNEY BURGE 

JANET BURNEY 

NATALIA COKINOS 

LAIRA DEL PAPA 

DEBBIE DUTTON 

DONNA DYKES 

MUFFET FONTE 



FONCIE FOWLKES 

SANDY GARRARD 

VIRGINIA HARRIS 

ANNE HIGGINS 

NANCY LANDRY 

MIMI O'CONNOR 

MARIA PARADELLO 

DELIA PERRY 

CATHY ROSE 

LAURIE SALE 

HELEN SNEED 

MISSY' WEBER 

LINDA WILKINSON 

LIZ WILLIAMS 



Pi Beta Phi 




Lodges / page 145 



Pi Kappa Alpha 




1 / GENE TOMLIN 

2 / SKIP BEASLEY 

3 / TRICKY DICK SANDERSON 

4 / DAVE DAUME 

5 / RANDY GONZALES 

6 / STEVE SHANKS 

7 / MIKE CHRISTIANSEN 

8 / GEORGE MARKS 

9 / INNOCENT BYSTANDER 

10 / JOHN GARISON 

11 / FRITZ KNARR 

12 / BOB BLEDSOE 

13 / HECTOR DEL CASTILLO 

14 / ED ROBERSON 

15 / LENNY CAROTA 

16 / STEVE CURTIS 

17 / STEVE SPOMER 

18 / PETE SPANN 

19 / JOHN HARLAN 

20 / ANDY ANDREW^S 

21 / JOHN AGNONE 

22 / AL CHILDS 

23 / BOB BIGHAM 

INDISCERNIBLE: 
STEVE AKIN 
GARY BANKS 
VIC BARBIERRI 
JOHNNY LEE BURNS 
BILL BUSH 
BILL DAUME 
HAROLD GONZALES 
CHAMP HOLLAND 
JIMMY DALE KOONTZ 
PAUL MALLON 
JIM MCNEAL 
VIC MISTRETTA 
BILL MIZE 
GENE PIQUE 
STEVE ROMIG 
CAM TALLY 
SANDY W^EBB 
RICK WORRAL 
KEVIN WRIGHT 



PAGE 146 / Lodges 










■■■- --M/ 

'«v>;... 



1 / MRS. EMILE BERTlCri 

2 / TIIOM <;ONZALEZ 

3 / HAL DECELL 

4 / HILLY WESSLER 

5 / TIM FARMER 

6 / SAM BANKS 

7 / LISA 

8 / GEORGE NELSON 

9 / BOB BROWN 

10 / ALEX WOOLDKIDGE 

11 / ERNEST MARTIN 

12 / MARTY DRAMUS 

13 / LARRY JACOBS 

14 / ART SMITH 

15 / MIKE FLORIE 

16 / JACK SPOTTSWOOD 

17 / STUART SMITH 

18 / BOB JOHNSON 

19 / BOB BARBOUR 

20 / JOE BRUCE 

21 / LEA CRUMP 

22 / TOM SMITH 
23 / BILL MCGREGOR 

24 / JERRY HILL 

25 / BILL ANDERSON 

26 / STEVE MUNRO 

27 / BILL HINCHY 

28 / CREW CLEVELAND 

29 / RICK RATHBUN 

30 / GEORGE BAKER 

31 / PAXTON SMITH 
32 / MIKE BERTUCCI 

33 / ERIC SWANSKN 

34 / FRAN NEWBERGER 

35 / HUGH MEAGHER 

36 / BILL BAILEY 

37 / RON BERTUCCI 

38 / STEVE PEDEN 

39 / DAN FORESTIERE 

40 / HILLIARD LAWLER 

41 / ACE MULLER 

42 / TOBY HECHT 

43 / TY TAYLOR 

44 / SAM JONES 
45 / RICHARD HENRY 

46 / B. J. LYON 

47 / JEFF KINSELL 

48 / MARK WAGNER 

49 / HUGH TAYLOR 

50 / PEIE BRYDEN 

51 / STEVE ROBINSON 

52 / CHARLEY FECHTEL 

53 / JOHNNY WILLIAMS 

54 / JIMMY LEE 

55 / MIKE MASON 

56 / ROBIN SANDAGE 

57 / CARLOS MCINERNEY 

58 / JACK SWETLAND 

59 / JIM MERRELL 

60 / HARRY MOON 

IMPEHCEPTIBLE: 

MIKE BILLINGSLEY 

CLAUDE CLAYTON 

STEVE CORTELYOU 



BOB DART 
GEORGE FERGUSON 
JOE GETTYS 
JOHNNY GILL 
RONNIE GUZMAN 
CHUCK HERLIHY 
CHARLES MOSS 
CRAIG PETERSON 
HENRY POTTER 
BILL ROBINSON- 
CLAY SPENCER 
BILLY WEIDNER 
BOBBY WESSLER 
JOHN WESSLER 



Sigma Alpha Epsilon 




Lodges / page 149 



Sigma Alpha Mu 




1 / BARRY WEINER 

2 / RICHARD SCHLAISGER 

3 / JIJMMY DRESNICK 

4 / BRUCE BERMAN 

5 / HEFF EFFRON 

6 / FRED KERSTEIN 

7 / HOWIE HOFFMAN 

8 / HUGH RAWN 

9 / STAN SHAPIRO 

10 / MIKE SHTEAMER 

11 / ELLIOT NOW 

12 / MIKE ROBBINS 

13 / MIKE FREEMAN 

14 / STEVE LUKINS 

15 / PAUL SILLS 

16 / MIKE LEWIS 

17 / SANDY BERNES 

18 / ROBERT KURLANDER 

19 / BOBBY HIRSCH 

20 / RICHARD WEINMAN 

21 / TRACY ROSEN 

22 /JEFF RUBIN 

23 / RICHARD BROWDY 

UNAPPARENT: 
CHUCK AUERBACH 
ROBERT BENNO 
ALBERT COHEN 
PAUL ELLENBOGEN 
ALAN GOER 
BARRY GOLDSMITH 
HOSS HERTZBERG 
MERRIL HICKS 
LARRY KARP 
STEVE KRINGOLD 
RICKY LEVENE 
JOHN LEVINE 
ROBERT LEVY 
RICHARD LICHTBLAU 
ALLEN RICHARD 
RICHARD MILLER 
JEFF PETERMAN 
BRAD ROLLER 
JOHNNY SALSTONE 
JOHN SCARPINATO 
DANNY SAKOLOFF 
KENNY SUTTMAN 
ANDY WILK 
TED ZELMAN 



PAGE 150 / Lodges 




\^-.- 



:^ 




Mi 





\- 



^ 



I 



<> 



V 



•A. 



r\ 



W' 




-i -.- 






1 / WIESS LEVERT 

2 / LEHMAN PREIS 

3 / STEVE KRAMER 
4 / MARTHA KLEY 

5 / ALBERT LOW 

6 / RAY BARNHILL 

7 / DAVID "L.D." gladden 

8 / GOLDEN GARVIN 

9 / CHARLEY ZEANAH 

10 / TERRY GUILFORD 

11/ SIGMA ALPHA EVERYBODY 

12 / STEWART KEPPER 

13/ BERNIE CHILL 

14 / MARC STONECIPHER 

15 / PAUL MOGABGAB 

16 / STEVE WOLFE 

17 / S'i'D MILLER 

18 / BILL WRIGHT 

19 / STEVE BROOKSHER 

20 / NORMAN VINN 

21 / DON SOMMERS 
22 / FRED LFVAUDAIS 

23 / HUGH "flame" BLANCHARD 

24 / STEPHEN MOGABGAB 

25 / JOE BROWN 

26 / JEFF ARMITAGE 

27 / CARL LEEDY 

28 / STEVE MEYER 

29 / BRIAN MUELLER 

30 /RICK WHITTINGTON 

31 / BOB CHAPMAN 

32 / ELI HOWELL 

33 / GUITAR RAY 

34 / MIKE STANTON 

35 / REED FARMER 

36 / MANNING CURTIS 

37 / JERRY CLARK 

38 / KENNY MARTINEZ 

39 / WALT GRUNDY 

40 / FRANK BURNSIDE 

41 / DABNEY EWIN 

42 / JOHN MUELLER 

43 / WENDEL STOtFT 

44 / PHIL SCHWARTZ 

45 / BILL SEALY 

46 / RICK SMITH 

47 / DAVIS WOODS 

NON-APPARENT: 

BOB FATOVIC 

jrvr CARTS 

BILL HEMETER 

TIM HUMMEL 

DAVEY MATTISON 

BILL MCDONNELL 

LARRY SHEA 

MACKIE SHILSTONE 

STEVE SLADE 

MONTY SMITH 

ALAN SPROWELS 

LEE TERRELL 

RONNIE TOMPKINS 



I 



SiCMA Chi 




Lodges- / pace 153 



Sigma Delta Tau 




1 /ANDY SERVOS 

2 / ELYSSE LEVITOV 

3 / DEBBIE POLLACK 

4 / PHYLLIS GUTTERMAN 
5 / SUZY PASCH 

6 / JOANNE BERLIN 

7 / CLAUDI PRICE 

8 / ALICE WEIL 

9 / NANCY SWIREN 

10 / KAREN BAUMGARTEN 

11 / ANITA JARRETT 

12 / BONNIE WEITZENKORN 

13 / DEBBIE SHACKLETON 

14 / SALLY SHUSHAN 

15 / LIN CHURNEY 

16 / JUDY HERMAN 

17 / DEBBY GOODMAN 

18 / CAROL SHURE 

19 / SHERRY BENDER 

20 / SUSAN SACKS 

21 / DEBBIE RACHLIN 

22 / LAURIE SHERMAN 

23 / JAN DRESKIN 

24 / RONDA FRIEDLANDER 

25 / JAYCE MAYERS 

26 / JEAN EICHENBAUM 

27 / JULIE FORB 

28 / DEBBY HARTZMARK 

29 / CAROL SELONICK 

30 / PEGGY BLACKMAN 

31 / SARA SHACKLETON 

32 / DONNA GOUSS 

33 / SUNIE LASKY 

34 / EVE KOVEN 

35 / AVA SEGAN 

36 / DEBBIE INKLES 

57 / SANDY BLUMENFELD 

38 / JAN JACKERSON 

39 / KAREN MILZER 

40 / BETTY SOLNICK 

41 / JUDI JACOBS 

42 / JUDY WESTON 

43 / BARB KAPLAN 

44 / RIEDY LUSTIG 

45 / LYNN HODES 

OUT OF SIGHT: 
PUDDIN BROWN 
BARBAR ELM AN 
WENDY GOLDBERG 
ELLIN GOODMAN 
ROBBIE GORDON 
PEGGY KOVEN 
PAULA MICHAEL 
MILLIE PELOFSKY 
GAIL ROSOFF 
GENIE ROTH 
CYNDI SHOSS 
STEPHANIE SWERDLIN 
SHERRY WILENSKY 



PAGE 154 / Lodges 



1 / TOM HARMOUTH 

2 / HUDSON SMITH 

3 / HARRY MACEY 

4 / BILL STECBAUER 

5 / STEVE JONES 

6 / DAVE CAREY 

7 / BABBETT 

8 / ST. ANN 

9 / HOLLY 

^0 / JOHN IIYSLOP 

11 / KIT 

12 / LESLIE 

13 / CAROL 

14 / SID JACOBSON 

15 / PHIL FANT 

16 / JOHN MILLER 

17 / SID MARLOW 

18 / PAT HERRINGTON 

19 / KEN VOSS 

20 / LANSING EVANS 

21 / TIM RATHBUN 

22 / ANN 

23 / MIKE VERON 

24 / LARRY COMISKY 

25 / ROSALIE 

26 / WES DOBRIAN 

27 / JOE WALLACE 

28 / SALLY 

29 / WILEY PATTERSON 

30 / STEVE JOHNSON 

31 / MIKE BOONE 

32 / DOUG JOHNSON 

33 / SCOTT DERICK 

34 / JIM TUDOR 

35 / GLEN MCELROY 

36 / SCOTTY 

37 / LEWIS ROACH 

38 / BETSY 

39 / ERIC DOERRES 

40 / LADSON WEBB 
41 / TONY THOMAS 

42 / HAL CROCKER 

43 / KATHY' 

44 / GORDON CAIN 

45 / ANN 

46 / CLIFF HORNBACK 

47 / FRANK KINDER 

48 / NANCY 

49 / BUTCH BAKER 

50 / MITCH SCHER 
51 / MIKE RICHARDSON 

52 / ROB STUIVI 

53 / MARY 

54 / JACKIE 

55 / JOHN DRYE 

56 / RICHARD LESTER 

57 / TOM SINKS 

NOT IN SIGHT: 

DANA ABBOTT 

MIKE CUTSHAW 

DOAK FOSTER 

SCOTT GARDNER 

BILL KRUCKS 

BRIAN MCGINNIS 

RON MCGINNIS 

SAM MILNE 

RUDY MURPHY 

P. J. PAPALE 

KEVIN PYLE 

PHIL SAVOLE 

ED WOLFF 



Sigma Nu 




Lodges / page 157 



Sigma Pi 




1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 
10/ 
11/ 
12/ 
13/ 
14/ 
15/ 
16/ 
17/ 
18/ 
19/ 
20/ 
21/ 
22/ 



MITCH BARBER 

TIP THIEDEMAN 

TAYLOR BERRY 

MARK KARPOFF 

DON RANDOLPH 

JERRY STAHLER 

JOHN YOUNG 

TOM MEACHAM 

CHARLES TERRACINA 

STEVE WATKINSON 

PETE BOCK 

LAWRENCE CHISOLM 

RON CARO 

NORMAN MATSUZAKI 

CHRIS MODENBACH 

MRS. GEORGIA WILLIAMS 

DAVE RUBIN 

DAN HORTON 

PAM GIARDINA 

STEVE WEBB 

DRUE WANDS 

DAN MAUTHE 



UNAVAILABLE : 
DENNIS DERBES 
STEVE GALE 



PAGE 185 / Lodges 






>i>fe 








. -V > 






a 



iT 



\ 



'i~^ 




■•-•.•t«*i 



/-^/^^ 'i 



N 



^ .^r 



< \ N-I . 'V,:^*;. 









■^•■'ii 




FrTini 

III BF 






aei^ «^ 



^H 




■ --- 


^^B -~..._^,- ■ 


B^^^- — ' 


^H'' 


^H 1 




JSliifi 






h:^E 


~-fr ■ ■ ^R 




-r 



,rL 



^y 



l^5B»l 



ri 





^ r- 


«^ 


' ^ >.-J 


■■■• 1^ 


T^J 






gajagj',. ■, 



I / SKIP HURLEY 
2 / JEFF GARTH 

3 / RICK WEISS 

4 / ALAN WAGIVER 

5 / MIKE ISRAEL 

6 / ERIC SAWYER 

7 / LOIV GOODMAN 

8 / SETH MICHELSON 

9 / LIN FARMER 

10/ (crazy) DALE HILDING 

II / STEVE KATZ 
12 / RANDY WINN 

13 / LEE GOODMAN 

14 / DOUG WILDER 

15 /KEN SIMONS 

16 / BOB GREENSTEIN 

17 / PETE SCHAUMBERG 

18 / NORM MARCUS 

19 / SCOTT ELLIS 

20 / BILL BEHRENDT 

21 / FRED SUSSMAN 

UNSEEN: 

JEFF BASEN 

AL BERGER 

CHARLIE DUKE 

BRUCE FINK 

PAT FLORY 

MEL GOLDIN 

JEFF HACKER 

JOHN HEYMAN 

PETER JACOBSON 

GARY KAPLAN 

ANDY KASSMAN 

BRUCE KRELL 

JIM MARKS 

JOEL MARX 

ELON POLLACK 

JIM RICHELER 

AL SWARTZBACH 

SCOTT SLOMIN 

SANDY SMILES 

SIDNEY S. SUNTAC 

ANDY WELLS 

LEO WIZNITZER 

ALAN YESNER 

STEVE ZAGOR 

STEVE ZETLEY 



Tau Epsilon Phi 




Lodges / page 161 



^rr 



1 / B. J. HARRIS 
2 / SUNNY 

3 / MARK DAVIS 

4 / JAY GRUBER 

5 / CRAIG WEIL 

6 / RANDY MARCUS 

7 / LARRY AND BOURBON SLUNG 
8 / DON WORLY 

9 / JAY ANTIS 

10 / STEWART ARMSTRONG 

11 /TOM SAUNDERS 

12 / "whoosh" FISCHER 

13 / BRUCE HILL 

14 / DAVID SILVERS 

15 / BOB BONO 

16 / ERON EPSTEIN 

17 / JIM LEWIS 

18 / RON FELLMAN 

19 / MARTY BARIS 

20 / CRAIG PEARLMAN 



Zeta Beta Tau 




21 / BOB LEVY 

22 / JEFF PERLMUTTER 

23 / ALAN BEYCHOK 

24 / STEVE BENZULY 

25 / ALAN BERGER 

26 / MICHAEL WEINSTOCK 

27 / STEVE CAVALIER 

28 / LARRY HAMBURG 

29 / "HOLLYWOOD" SOMERSTEIN 

30 / JOHN BAUM "F.M." 

31 / BARRY "p.m." ARGINTAR 

32 / RANDY GALANTI 

33 //DAVID ROSS 

34 / RICKY KANFER 

35 / RICKY HIRSCH 

36 / STEVE "fro" LAVEN 

37 / TED BISKIND 

38 / RANDY UNGAR 

39 / BOB DIAMOND 

40 / ALAN ORKIN 

41 / GARY JONES 

42 / "MILHUNKIE" SCHWAB 

43 / BENNY EICHHOLZ 

44 / HOWARD REISMAN 

45 / SCOTT GINSBURG 

46 / BOB GROSSMAN 



INDISTINGUISHABLE : 
RONNIE ARONOFF 
DAVID BAUMAN 
STEVE BAUMAN 
ALAN BURTON 
SHELDON CANTOR 
MARTY DETTELBACH 
RICK DOBKIN 
BRUCE FEINGERTS 
DAVID FINKEL 
FLIP FRANK 
IRA FRANK 
MAX FRIDMAN 
JOHN HASPEL 
DOUG HERTZ 
DAVID HESDORFFER 
LARRY JOSEPHSON 
LARRY KAISER 
EDDIE KATZ 
GLENN KATZ 
JAY KAYSER 
PAUL LASKY 
CHUCK LEANESS 
WALTER LEVY 
LEE LEVINSON 
DON LINSKY 
PAUL LUBIN 
DAVID MAGRISH 
LEON MARKS 
RUSTY PALMER 
STEVE PORDY 
NED PRICE 
DANNY RASKIN 
JAY SCHILLER 
JIM SNIDER 
MIKE STERN 
PHIL STYNE 
MICKEY WALL 
GORDY WEIL 
KEN WEIL 
GARY WEISS 
MATT ZALE. 



PAGE 162 / Lodges 



M>.> 



itii- 



.Ulinif 



TV 



5 ci: Millilk'j-MSff^if'^ ' 



-ifc^ 




) 



>«v. 



^**^ 



4i 









V 










^ 



u 


- 




•^.J 




•J 


;!^- 


1 




>^.f*fe>' 




r-*'- 








% » 







•-•••' k .'■!«, 



„m Actio" "^"S"" 



SECOND 



PRINI 



The 
Problems 

and 
Prospects 

of 

LSD 



IHOM«llMf'ff«J'i 



;^'^--".'"'r„Tr««-" ; 



t-ruA ct'-* iwt*^' 



^ ,. w» t«» •" ""r; d -which "*• 



CH*«l« C rw.»*s 



^r. »■"■ '"•' "^ »^ *• "^ 





^il. 






<r 



NON-MEDICAL 
« -^ OF DRUGS 



■^ 



\ 



l!f 








Phi Alpha Delta: 



IIORACIO ALFARO AROSEMENA 
ERNEST E. BARROW 
WILLIAM T. BENHAM 
RICARDO A. BILONICK 
EARLE L. BLIZZARD 
GLENN E. BRADFORD 
MICHAEL D. COSSEX 
DANIEL R. DEL PRIORE 
ANDREW F. DORA, JR. 
SHIRLEY EGAN 
RICHARD L. EPSTEIN 
RONALD J, FAHRENBACHER 
CALVIN L. FOX 
DAVID E. GOLIA 
WALDON M. HINGLE 
CHARLES B. HAHN, JR. 
EUGENE M. KATZ 
JEANNE F. KRUEGER 
HAROLD B. KUSHNER 
JOHN L. LANDREM, JR. 
ROBERT A. LEE 
HELTON G. MARSHALL 
PATRICIA A. MATHES 
WILLIAM R. MORGAN 
MICHAEL T. PAWLUS 
ROBERT A. PEARSON 
JOHN A. POINDEXTER 
ABBOTT J. REEVES 
DANNY K. HESTER 
HARRY A. ROSENBERG 
JAMES V. SCARLATA 
STEPHEN B. SHARBER 
DAVID B. SPENCER 
HELEN L. SULLIVAN 
WALTER C. THOMPSON, JR. 
GEORGE H. TROXELL, III 
JAMES M. WALLEY 
JAMES C. WILSON 



Phi Delta Phi 





PHILIP ALLEN 


WILEY LASTRAPES 




WILLIAM ALLISON 


C. LAYTON 




HARRY ANDERSON 


CHARLES LECHE 




ALEXANDER ASHY 


FRANK LOMBARDO 




PHILIP AZAR 


GEOFFREY LONGENECKER 




BRANK BARRY 


CHARLES LOZES 




JOHN BAUM 


ROBERT MANARD 




BRIAN BEGUE 


JON >IASSEY 




DARRYL BERGER 


EARL MCCALLON 




LEONARD BERINS 


EDWARD MCCLOSKEY 




HENRY BERNSTEIN 


EDMUND MCILHENNY 




EARL BLIZZARD 


MALCOLM ME-i-ER 




HAROLD BLOCK 


MACHALE MILLER 




GERALD BOSWORTH 


BRAINARD MONTGOMERY 




JOHN BRODERS 


RICHARD MONTGOMERY 




RANDALL BROOKS 


B. NOEL 




ROBERT CASEY 


RALEIGH OHLMEYER 




EDWARD CASTAING 


JEREMIAH O'KEEFE 




WILLIS CAUDLE 


MICHAEL O'KEEFE 




HUGH CHERRY 


TORGER OMDAHL 




RUTLEDGE CLEMENT 


MARSHALL ORDERMANN 




RICHARD CHRISTOVICH 


LYLE PHILLIPSON 




GEORGE CROUNSE 


JOHN PICKRON 




INMOND DEEN 


n. POUDRIER 




DEE DRELL 


WALLACE QUINN 




DAVID EDWARDS 


JAMES ROSS 




PETER EVERETT 


JERRY SAPORITO 




jim:\iy farwell 


JOHN SAUNDERS 




MICHAEL FITZPATRICK 


DAN SCHEUERMANN 




PAUL GAROFALO 


EDWIN SCHLESINGER 




DIEGO GIORDANO-ECHEGOYEN 


KEVIN SCHOENBERGER 




JEFF HACKER 


DONALD SHINDLER 




HARRY HARDIN 


ERNEST SMALLMAN 




RONALD HARRIS 


IRVIX; SIINAIDER 




ROBERT IIEARIN 


THOMAS SPROTT 




HARRY HENDERSON 


JOHN STEINER 




HENRY JUMONVILLE 


LOUIS TRENCHARD 




WILLIAM KAMMER 


LEE WALLACE 




DAVID KERSTEIN 


ROBERT WIEGAND 




k<m;fk landhol:m 


.) WIKS WILSON 




JOHN I.ANDREM 


1 KVNK VOHAN. JR. 



Lodges — School of Law / page 165 



Phi Chi 



DAVE ABBOTT 


GARY EPLER 


AL LOTMAN 


GREER RICKETSON 


RICHARD ANDERSON 


CHARLIE FISCHMAN 


MIKE MAFFETT 


GENE ROSENBERG 


TOM ANDERSON . 


ROB FLANDRY 


NEIL MANowrrz 


JIM SHELLEY 


HANK ARNOLD 


JACK FLEET 


JOE MARNELL 


CHRIS SKINNER 


RALPH ASBURY 


BARRY FRAME 


ART MATTHEWS 


CLAY SKINNER 


ALVIN AUBRY 


JOE GARCIA-PRATS 


CRAIG MAUMUS 


JASON SMITH 


JESSE AUSTIN 


VIC GARCIA-PRATS 


PAUL MEYER 


JIM SMITH 


STEVE BAHOE 


BEN GUIDER 


LEE MCAMIS 


STEVE SORGEN 


RON BARBIE 


PAUL GULBAS 


HOWARD MOORE 


JODY SOSNOW 


BOB BAXTER 


DICK HALL 


TED MOORE 


GEORGE STELLING 


KEN BREWINGTON 


TOM HARPER 


JIM MOROCK 


DENNIS SUICH 


BILL BUTLER 


JOHN HESS 


KEN MULLEN 


BOB TANNER 


STAN CARSON 


BILL HOCKING 


MAURICE NASSER 


BILL THOMPSON 


RICH CAVIN 


JERRY HOLLEMAN 


HAL NEELY 


BOB TOFTE 


ART CHANG 


GARY HOLT 


DON NOVICK 


LARRY TRUE 


JOE CHIAPELLA 


PRESLEY JACKSON 


ART NUSSBAUM 


JOHN TURBA 


GEORGE CHU 


DAN JACOB 


BILL OLSON 


MIKE WALSH 


BILL COLEMAN 


CHARLIE JOHNSON 


DAVE OLSON 


JIM WATTS 


KEN COMBS 


BOB KAMINSKI 


JIM OWEN 


JIM WEAVER 


JIM COOK 


ROCKY KENT 


LAT PARKER 


BRITTON WEST 


JOHN COOPER 


CRAIG KESSLER 


JIM PATTERSON 


LEE WINE LAND 


JOHN CURTISS 


WAYNE LARRABEE 


LOU POPEJOY 


CRAIG WINKEL 


DALTON DIAMOND 


JEFFREY LAU 


BILL RAWLINGS 


JOHN WINTER 


JON EDWARDS 


BOB LIPSON 


JOHN REA 


JOHN YOUNGBERG 


DAVE ELWONGER 


CHARLIE LONG 


WHIT READER 





Alpha Kappa Kappa 



Phi Delta Epsilon 



PETER BREIDENBACH 
MICHAEL DESHAZO 
WAYNE HENRY 
DREW LOGUE 
MIKE LUNDY 
JOE MCCRARY 
MORRIS MANN 
LARRY MATSUMOTO 
JOHN STOVER 
LARRY SPRATLING 



Nu Sigma Nu 



LOWELL BARECK 


GARY JANKO 




JEROME BLACKMAN 


JAN KAUFMAN 




JANICE BLUMENTHAL 


IVRI KUMIN 




RICHARD EPSTEIN 


HAL ROSENBLATT 




LARRY GALINKIN 


DONALD ROSENBLUM 




ERIC GEWOLB 


S. ANDREW SCHWARTZ 




MICHAEL GOLDBERG 


RICHARD SILVER 




PETER GOLDMAN 


RICHARD STROBACH 




KEN GORDON 


STEVEN TAYLOR 




DAVID HAFT 


DAVID WILENSKY 




MICHAEL HIGGINS 


MICHAEL ZOLLER 




GEORGE HOFFMAN 







LAURENCE AREND 


ART FOUGNER 


WILLIAM LACORTE 


BILL REED 




LARRY BARNES 


BOB GRIFFITH 


JAY MAGGIORE 


JAMES SAALFIELD 




RODNEY BARNHART 


THOMAS GRIMSTAD 


DONALD MAHONEY 


RICHARD «ABATIER 




STEPHEN BINNS 


WARREN HAGAN 


HARVEY MARICE 


WOODY SANDERS 




BOB BLANDENSHIP 


GEORGE HARRIS 


JOHN MARTIN 


DAVID SANDERSON 




STEPHEN BRINT 


STEVE HARRIS 


PHIL MCKINLEY 


FRED SCHERT 




RANDY BUCHANAN 


STEVE HARRISON 


DAVID MCLAIN 


MARSHALL SCHREEDER 




WILL BUFFAT 


THOMAS HAWK 


BOB MERIWETHER 


RANDY SEYBOLD 




BILL CALDWELL 


JOHN HOBBS 


HOWARD MILLER 


JOHN SIMMONS 




BOB CARD 


ROBERT HOSEA 


ROBERT MILLER 


BILL SLAUGHTER 




BOB CLARK 


THOMAS HOWARD 


GARY MORRISON 


KEN SMITH 




BILL CLARKE 


JOHN HUDNALL 


JIM MURPHY 


MARVIN SMITH 




RONALD CYGAN 


PAUL HUNT 


CHARLES O'MARA 


ARNOLD SPANJERS 




GARY DANOS 


WALTER JAMES 


WILLIAM O'MARA 


BILL SPENCER 




THOMAS DAVIS 


ROBERT JEFFERS 


RICHARD OTTS 


LAMAR TEAFORD 




GEORGE DESORMEAUX 


WILLIAM JOHNSON 


PAUL PACE 


TIM TRICHE 




PAT DOLAN 


JIM JOHNSTON 


ROBERT PATYRAK 


JAMES TUCKER 




REA VIS EUBANKS 


SCOTT KELLERMANN 


RICHARD PERRYMAN 


BILL TURNER 




RICHARD EVANS 


JAMES KNOEPP 


PETE PROSSER 


ROBERT WALLACE 




BRICE FISICHELLA 






RICHARD WESTFAL 





PAGE 166 / Lodges — School of Medicine 



V 



'•N 



h 



.■y '• 



^/f • .£j^ ^^ 



..^' 



\ 



r ^ 

I 



•><*1_- 



»>^- 



-,v 





^^ 




1 --^ 




f 4 


't. 




i 


•1^ 


1 


I^H 


^Im 


^iy^ 




^v-' 


1 




m 





^•t??l 



"'Sait, ] 



J 



JAMBALAYA 1971 

EDITOR 
MATT ANDERSON 

PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLICES 

FRANCISCO ALECHA, WYLIE DAWSON, 

PATRICIA HOPKINS, AND SHEILAH SILVER 

HELPING HANDS 

LISA BENNETT, JOHN BLEHAR, ANNE BOUDREAUX, 
DIANE BURNSIDE, GAYLE CARP, MISSY CHEESEMAN, 
JEAN COLEMAN, MARIA DAVIS, JIM DUNNIGAN, 
TERRY EDWARDS, ELLEN HANCKEL, JOHN JAMES, 
LUCY LANE, KAREN LAUTZ, SUZANNE LEBLANC. 
SUZANNE LIGHTER, DEBIE LONG, KIT LOZES, AARON 
NAVAH, PAULA PERRONE, SANDY' RUBIN, TAMMY 
SINDLER, AND KATHY TEMPLETON 



PHOTOGRAPHY 

MATT ANDERSON/ cover, 2, 4, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 23, 
26, 30, 33, 36, 39, 44, 45, 47, 67, 70, 72, 73, 74, 76 
(bottom), 77, 78, 79 (bottom), 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 
89, 90, 104, 105, 106 (top), 107 (bottom), 115, 
121, 122, 125, 126, 132, 136, 139, 144, 152. 
BUDDY brimberg/ 22, 34, 62, 65. jim dunnigan/ 
15, 21, 24, 38, 40, 63, 68 (sequence), 69. farrell 
hockemeier/ 10, 11, 12, 18 (lop), 27, 29, 35, 37, 
41, 49. JOHN JAMES/ 31, 32, 58, 60 (top), 80 (bot- 
torn), 91, 117, 155, 160. PAT PRINS/ 16, 54-57. 
MIKE SMITH/ 6, 7, 8, 9, 25, 28, 42, 50, 51, 52, 53, 
59, 60 (bottom), 66, 68 (middle), 71, 75, 76 (lop), 
79 (top), 80 (lop), 81, 88, 89, 92, 94, 96, 98, 99, 
100, 103, 104, 105, 106 (bottom), 107 (top), 108- 
113, 118, 128, 131, 135, 140, 143, 147, 148, 151, 
156, 159, 163, 164, 167, 168. georce welch/ 43. 




^STI 



UL 




1 



AIMS 



I 



JAMBALAWV 



UNIVERSITY 



LOUISIANA 



I 




4 / THE YEAR OF THE GREEN: 
FRO>I LIBBOCK TO >IE.^IPHIS 
38 / BASKETBALL 
44 / GYMNASTICS 
46 / S\^ liVnHNG 
50 / TRACK 
54 / TENNIS 
58 / GOLF 
60 / BASEBALL 
64 /VARSITY SCORES 
66 / SAILING CLUB 
70 /BARRACUDA CLUB 
71 / SCI BA CLIB 
72 /NATIONAL >IOOT COURT 

73 /DEBATE CLUB 

74 / SOCCER CLUB 
76 RT GBY 

78 INTRA>Il RALS 
78 PAN-HEL SPORTS 

80 CI n? SCORES 

82 SIT DENT SENATE 

81 I.F.C. 

8.^ PAN-HELLENIC 




In case you 

did not happen 

to notice any of 

the 20,000 decals, 

8,000 window posters, 

50,000 bumper stickers, 

150,000 schedule cards, 

50,000 lapel pins, or 500,000 

billing stutters, 1970 was the 

Year of the Green. The success 

enjoyed by the Green Wave on the gridiron 

in 1970 was anticipated by a mammoth publicity campaign 

that proclaimed that 1970 would be the year the drought ended. The advertising program was a success 

because interested alumni and local media officials donated freely of their time, talent, and facilities. 

During the summer, the slogan proclaiming that 1970 was the Year of the Green appeared on billboards, 
public transit, and radio and television broadcasts, all of the space and time donated to the University 
at cost. The fact that the drought did end in 1970 is a tribute to Tulane's football team; the fact that 
it did not go unnoticed is a tribute to a group of dedicated alumni and citizens concerned with the future 
of their University. 



• 



-G. P. L. 
April 27, 1971 



PAGE 4 / Varsity Sports 




From Lubbock 
to Memphis 

By 

Gayle Patrick Letulle 
& Matt Anderson 



/ PAGE 5 



-t 




"We have to win 



. we neech§p, 






,000 in the Stadium next weeit." 

—Dr. Rix Yard 

s^^ Director of Atlij^y^^ 



'] 




> 





'-^ 






X 



<Ti,.....-'-7'."Ky.5^ 






PAGE 6 / Varsity Sports 




^ 




The Year ot the Green moved \fom the practice field to 
Texas Tech's pHush artitical turit on September 12. 1970. 
The jitters normally present lor the opening o( a new 
season were multiplied on this mugg^5ummer evening 
by the importance of this particular sea^n to the future 
o( Tulane football. Quite a bit o( time and energy had 
been expended in the promotion of this TulaW football 
team as a legitimate winner and the time had cdnie to 
prove it < 

Things looked good for a while as Tulane look a 14-74 
lead into the fourth quarter but the Red Raiders struck 
twice (in the last nine minutes of play.) to lake a 21-14 
victory. "We were a desperate football team after that 
loss to Texas Tech," linebacker Ricky Kingrea 
reminisced after the season. "Before the game we 
didn't leel that anyone could beat us . . . but that fourth 
quarter collapse brought us down to earth, and we were 
a better football team (or it. Tailback David At>ercrombie 
picked up 117 yards running (rom the Green Wave's 
newly installed "I " lormation and the defensive unit 
looked sharp as Joe Bullard picked off the, first two of 
an eventual team record 28 Interceptions "ruiane would 
make during the season. " » 

-G.P.L. 



Tulane Stadium /September 19th 




"It's going to be a little wet out there tonight. The grass Is wet. The footing seems real good. 
So, relax and try to take care of the football. Take care of that football when you're getting hit 

and when you're catching the football. 

The main thing we need to do, men, is go out there and play our game of football. Our 

aggressive, balls out game of football. This is the way we've practiced; this is the way we should 

play. And the thing about is— we ought to go out there and have a lot of fun. Let's not go out 

there and take chances. Let's go out there and have a lot of fun and knock those bulldogs' tails 

off. We'll get some points on that scoreboard! And then we'll have a hell of a lot of fun! Right? 

This is the only way to play the game. Go out there and have a lot of fun and 

get after their ass and keep at it for the entire 60 minutes. We can't for one minute let down. 

And remember as I told you yesterday: should a break go against you, and they get something 

good happening to them, it is a 60 minute ballgame, and we're going to play it for 60 minutes 

this week. Do all of you agree that you are going to play for 60 minutes? {Team: "Yes, sir!") 

Alright! Let's go out there and get them!" 

—Coach Pittman 




PAGE 8 / Varsity Sports 




i'^'k ''«^,^«^ 








'*.■■ ■■ » 


k-J^ - Jrp 1 * *■ "^Cmi^^lH^^^H 


k 






^ 



Rix Yard had to settle for a crowd of 30,000 
fans, but nonetheless, the Year of the Green 
began to pick up steam as the Wave opened 
its home stand with a 17-14 victory over 
Georgia The Bulldogs did all of their scoring in 
the first half on a 62 yard punt return, a two 
point conversion and a pair of field goals. 
Tulane scored only once in the first half on the 
first play after rover Joel Henderson recovered 
a Georgia fumble which had been forced by a 
fierce punt rush. Fullback Bob Marshall raced 
Into the end zone from 11 yards out for the 
score. 

The Green Wave continued to peck away at 
the Bulldog lead in the third quarter, with 
heads-up defensive play figuring prominently in 
the comeback. An interception by sophomore 
linebacker Glenn Harder at the Bulldog 27 on 
the second play of the period set up the tying 
touchdown, scored by quarterback Greg 
Gleason on a one yard sneak seven plays later. 
Joe Bullards third interception of the season 
came a bit later in the third quarter and set up 
a 26 yard field goal by Lee Gibson that proved 
to be the margin of victory. Things got a bit 
heated in a scoreless fourth period, as the 
Green Wave successfully fought to insure that 
a 35-0 licking administered by the Bulldogs the 
previous season would be properly avenged. 



-G.P.L. 




/ P.VGE 9 



Memorial 
Stadium/ 

September 26th 

A wet, wintry day greeted the kickoff 
of the Tulane-lllinois game in Cham- 
paign, but the off track did not bother 
Joe Bullard. The junior defensive 
back forged into the national leader- 
ship in interceptions as he picked off 
three lllini passes to raise his season 
total to six. He then capped off an 
already sensational performance 
with an unbelievable 77 yard punt 
return that insured a 23-9 Tulane 
victory. The game film revealed that 
Bullard evaded no less than eight 
Illinois tacklers as he swept down the 
sidelines en route to paydirt and an 
award of the game ball from his 
teammates. 

A field goal and a one yard sneak 
by outstanding Illinois sophomore 
quarterback Mike Wells staked the 
lllini to an early 9-0 lead, but Tulane 
wiped that out with a 32 yard field 
goal by Lee Gibson at the close of 
the first half, and a 20 yard touch- 
down scamper by Abercrombie at 
the beginning of the third period. The 
fourth quarter opened with Tulane 
on the march, climaxing as quarter- 
back Greg Gleason tossed a one 
yard touchdown pass to tight end Art 
Ledet, standing alone at the rear of 
the end zone. Bullard's punt return 
later in the fourth period put the final 
nail in the lllini coffin. The following 
Tuesday, Tulane's name appeared 
for the first time on the Associated 
Press' list of the top thirty teams in 
the nation. 

-G.P.L. 





Nippert Stadium /October 2nd 




■>*ssersrVT 




The Green Wave made it three wins in a row with a heart-stopping 6-3 
victory over the surprisingly tough Cincinnati Bearcats. Tulane amassed 
its highest offensive yardage total of the season in the contest, but all 
assaults on the Bearcat goalline failed until sophomore quarterback Mike 
Walker came off the bench to guide his mates on a 75 yard march to 
paydirt midway through the fourth period. Walker completed five of six 
pass attempts during the drive, hitting split end Mike Paulson with a 
23 yard strike for the winning score. Dame Fortune notwithstanding, 
an unyielding defense (that wound up sixth in the nation) merited most 
of the praise for the Green Wave's three game win string. 

-G.P.L. 




'*W* w*r« f«al lodurut* lo com* ofl 
thai fWd lonighL bvcaus* w* dktnl 
pl«T wflll We made way too many 
mistahvt- We |u*t wefen'i rea<ty to 
play and make (bote hind ol 
mistake* We were real lucky thai we 
won the lootbali game Now. a wm • 
a win. txjl you can b«l your att. that 
we're nol ready to play rveil we efc . 
when we go lo Cdofado Springs . . . 
or we're goir^ to be a tad group. 
They ve got a hell ol a lootbali leam. 
that's rated ten in the nation We 
were real lorlunale tonight, and il 
you want lo g«l a lot of altonlion jutl 
step up there ar>d choose one ol 
those learns in the top ten arxJ 
knock their asses oft And III 
guarantee you that you wtN get all 
kifKJs ol f«cogntttor\,'* 

—Coach PIttman 



/ PACE 11 



Falcon Stadium 
/October 10th 



"We've got a challenge out there today, and 
of course, as I told you earlier, the hat ought 
to be on those people because they're the 
ones who are nationally rated. We came in 
here to take that away from them. That's 
the only reason we came up here, to get 
at them and play the good ball game that 
we're capable of playing, free of mistakes. 
If we do this for the entire 60 minutes, men, 
well, then we can win this football game . 

. . . Don't worry about the weather. The 
only thing that we're concerned about is 
those people across the line of scrimmage 
from us. . . . As talked about it earlier, you 
might get winded the first minute or two of 
the ball game, but we'll come back. Don't 
worry about that. We've practiced a hell of 
a lot of afternoons. We've run a lot of sprints 
when It was hard to breathe, haven't we? 
And we've always managed to run one or 
two more. So this is where you've got to 
suck it up, and then that air will come back 
to you. . . ." 

—Coach Pittman 



Tulane's mid-season clash with unbeaten 
and nationally ranked Air Force provided the 
Green Wave with an opportunity to grab a 
little national acclaim for itself, not to men- 
tion a chance to impress bowl selection 
committees. The Green Wave blew that 
chance in a disappointing 24-3 loss. From 
this point on. the pressure continued to build 
as each succeeding contest became crucial 
to the team's hopes of a post season invite. 









'■|'ifyu^.y^^w, 




^J>k^ ^ ^^ ^ 





Tulane's defense in the loss to Air Force was almost as 
good as its offense was bad and that's saying a lot. With two 
offensive line starters out with injuries and number one rusher 
David Abercrombie playing sparingly because of an attack of 
influenza, the Green Wave's offensive unit sputtered to its 
lowest output of the season (131 yards), fumbling eight times 
in the process. 

The Falcons came into the game with the number one pass- 
ing attack in the nation, but managed only 159 yards through 
the air against 'Bullard's Bandits." Safety Paul Ellis accounted 
for two of the Green Wave's four interceptions. The Falcons, 
however, did manage to complete the only touchdown pass 
thrown against Tulane in 1970. but the Wave defense showed 
It could hold Its own against the best. Another thing the Air 
Force loss showed was that Tulane, without David Abercrom- 
bie, was a team without an effective offense, a fact that became 
painfully obvious two weeks later in rainy Atlanta. 

-G.P.L. 

/ PAGE 13 



Tulane Stadium 
/October 17th 




Sophomore quarterback Mike 
Walker got his first collegiate 
starting assignment against the 

North Carolina Tar Heels and 
made good, passing the Green 
Wave to a 24-17 victory. The win 
was an important one since a 
second consecutive loss would 
probably have eliminated Tulane 
from consideration for a bowl 
invite. Walker got a little help 
through the airways from tailback 
David Abercrombie, who threw a 
74 yard option pass to wingback 
Steve Barrios on the second play 
from scrimmage, staking the Green 
Wave to an early 7-0 lead. North 
Carolina used the running of 
All-American Don McCauley to tie 
it up and then went ahead by 
converting a fumble recovery into 
a 20 yard field goal. But Walker 
came back with a strong air game 
that brought the Green Wave 
down to the Tar Heel goal line and 
finally snuck over from the two 
yard line to give Tulane a 14-10 
halftime lead. 

Walker's 28 yard strike to split end 
Mike Paulson set up a 21 yard 
Tulane field goal in the third 
period, but the running of 
McCauley led to another Tar Heel 
touchdown and a 17-17 deadlock. 
A 42 yard pass from Walker to 
Barrios and a one yard plunge by 
David Abercrombie accounted for 
a 43 yard drive that produced the 
winning score for Tulane. North 
Carolina came back with a 
desperation drive down to the 
Tulane five yard line in the dying 
minutes of the contest but the 
Green Wave made a stand to 
preserve the victory. The 
emergence of Walker as an 
offensive leader marked a turning 
point in the effectiveness of a 
Tulane passing attack that 
heretofore had been a sore 
disappointment. 



-G.P.L. 



PAGE 14 / Varsity Sports 




/ PAGE 15 




Grant Field 
/October 24th 



". . . Men, the weather conditions aren't the best in the world, but it is the 
same for Georgia Tech as it is for us. The thing we want to do is take care 
of the football . . . the kicking game is going to be a real important phase 
of this game under these conditions, so we have got to play our kicking game 
right up to the hilt. We've got to handle the kicking situation with a lot of 
poise and a lot of confidence . . . 

. . . men, we've got a lot at stake out there, and we've got the ability to 
go out there and get it. All that it amounts to Is that real fine effort. Let's 
go out there and play a tough one and get after their ass. Let's take it on 
out . . ." 

—Coach Pittman 




PAGE 16 / Varsity Sports 




The bowl pressure continued to mount as Tulane and Georgia Tech, both 
with 4-2 records, met in a game that would virtually assure the winner of 
a post season invitation, 

A devastating downpour greeted this clash between the two top ranked 
Independents in the South, and the two teams sloshed into the fourth quarter 
in a scoreless deadlock, Tulane seemed to have the upper hand in the 
fourth quarter when, with a fourth and 11 to go at the Tech 39 yard line. 
Ken Sanders dropped back to punt for the Green Wave. The snap from 
the center sailed far over Sanders' head, and when he retrieved it on his 
own 30 yard line, he was clobbered by a host of Yellow Jacket rushers. 
The ball popped into the air where it was picked off by a Tech defensive 
back Rick Lewis— remember that name— who carried in for the score. 



Down 7-0 with the field conditions worsening. Tulane had to throw the 
wet football if it hoped to win. On the first play after the kickoff. Lewis picked 
off an errant Mike Walker pass, returning it 56 yards for Tech's second 
score within a 30 second period Three minutes later. Lewis picked ol( a 
pass thrown by substitute quarterback Greg Gleason. and returned it to 
the Tulane 23 to set up the final Yellow Jacket score. 

Gleason took the Green Wave on a 67 yard scoring march after the ensuing 
kickoff. but if was obviously too late to get Tulane back in the tiall game. 
David Abercrombie rushed for 70 yards in the second half of the contest. 
after being held out of the first half with a bruised thigh Without Abercrombie. 
Tulane managed only 19 yards rushing in that first half. 

-G.P.L. 




/ PAGE 17 






Dudley Field/october 31st 






PAGE 18 / Varsity Sports 



Defensive back David Hebert's 

interception in tine end zone during 

the final minute of play thwarted a 

desperation drive by plucky 

Vanderbilt and preserved a 10-7 

Tulane victory. David Abercrombie 

returned to the starting lineup 

against the Commodores and added 

101 yards to his season rushing total, 

scoring the Green Wave's only 

touchdown on a 21 yard sweep of 

his right end early in the first quarter. 

Vanderbilt got on the scoreboard 

with a 55 yard drive early in the 

second half that knotted the score at 

7-7. Later on in the third quarter 

quarterback Mike Walker hit fullback 

Bob Marshall with swing passes that 

gained 16 and 12 yards and got the 

Green Wave close enough for Lee 

Gibson to boot a 40 yard field goal 

that proved to be the margin of victory. 

That three point lead didn't look very 

healthy late in the fourth period when 

Vandy quarterback Denny Painter 

(whose 79 yard touchdown pass had 

given the Commodores a 26-23 

victory in the final minute of play the 

year before) completed four of five 

passes in a drive that reached down 

to the Tulane ten yardline. Hebert 

stepped in front of Painter's next 

toss, however, and the Vandy threat 

ended right there. 

-G.P.L. 






raiRi 


^^^flOTSw 


A --.r<«5 


r^^^SH i^HjHi \b9?^^ ~^ 




/ PAGE 19 



E 


£ 


3 


r^ 


•a 


^ 


(0 


d> 


(0 


qui 


0) 


0) 


c 


> 


(0 o 


3 


c 



All hell broke loose in the Tulane 

defensive secondary during the 

Miami game as "Bullard's Bandits" 

burned frustrated Hurricane 

quarterbacks for a team record eight 

interceptions. The Green Wave built 

up a 31-0 lead before Miami 

managed to score a pair of quick 






PAGE 20 / Varsity Sports 




touchdowns in the final two minutes 

of play accounting for the 31-16 

outcome. Paul Ellis and David Hebert 

each made three interceptions, while 

Joe Bullard and Randy Lee had one 

apiece as the Hurricanes just kept 

putting the football in the air. Five 

different players shared in the 

scoring as Hebert started it off with a 

32 yard interception return for a 

score Split end Mike Paulson later 

grabbed a 49 yard TD pass from 

Mike Walker to give Tulane a 14-0 

halftime lead. Short touchdown runs 

by David Abercrombie and Jim Batey 

and a 32 yard field goal by Lee 

Gibson capped off the Tulane 

scoring in the second half. The big 

win over the Hurricanes before a 

happy Homecoming throng kept alive 

the Green Waves slim hopes for a 

Bowl bid. 




-GPL. 



/ PACE 21 




S'lgwaaiaa'g^^ia 



Tulane Stadium 
/november 21st 



A record breaking rushing performance by 

David Abercrombie and shutout defense 

combined to spark the Green Wave to a 31-0 

wn over North Carolina State, prompting the 

Liberty Bowl to send Executive Director Bud 

Dudley down for a personal look at the team 

the following week, when Tulane hosted 

arch rival LSD. Abercrombie raced through 

the Wolfpack for 246 yards in 33 carries to 

wipe out the previous single game record of 

238 yards set by Eddie Price in 1949. But a 

knee injury sustained on the carry that broke 

the record, left him in doubt for the LSD 

clash. 

Tulane's defensive front nailed Wolfpack 
quarterbacks for losses 13 times during the 
evening, as North Carolina wound up with 
only 50 yards of total offense. Abercrombie 
scored three times for the Green Wave, with 
the other points coming on a one yard run 
by Maxie LeBlanc, and a 39 yard field goal 

by Lee Gibson. 

The romps over Miami and North Carolina 

State were Tulane's best efforts of the 

season, as the squad parlayed opportunistic 

offense and defensive play that literally 

frustrated anything the opposition tried into 

a pair of easy wins. More significant, 

however, was Coach Pittman's declaration to 

the team after the North Carolina State 

game. "If we don't get after those guys 

(referring to LSU) next week, I'm going to 

throw in the towel." 

^ ^ -G.P.L. 





PAGE 22 : /; ^ VKSn V J^roiTT^i 



I 



/ 




"This is {he football game that I think we've been 
waiting to tee up again, against these people, since 
a year ago. It's one that we can handle. We're ready 
to play a football game. We're ready to get out there 
and get after their tails. 

The thing that we want to do is have poise, don't 
make those mistakes that get you in trouble. Let's 
go out there and execute, and play our football game. 
Just relax. The damn pressure is on them, right? 
Let's go out there and really go after their tails . 

... As i said this morning, we have won six straight 
games on our field out there. We're going to make 
this number seven. The people that are responsible 
for this, men, are the seniors on our football team 
today. They have given us the leadership to come 
from an average football team to a winning football 
team. I think that we owe them a great deal. This 
is the last football game that they're going to play 
on our home field representing Tulane University. 
I'd like to have those seniors come over here and 
line up right against this wall, and we will all come 
over and shake hands with you." 

—Coach Pittman 





Tulane Stadium 

/november 28th 



That long awaited win over LSU eluded the Green Wave again, but the squad 
showed enough in a 26-14 loss to the Tigers to merit a bid from the Liberty 
Bowl immediately after the game. All four LSU touchdowns were set up by 
Tulane mistakes (two fumbles, a pass interception and a bad snap from center 
in a punting situation all turned the ball over to the Tigers deep in Tulane 
territory) as what once would have been considered a "moral victory" proved 
to be nothing but a bitter defeat. Tulane's touchdowns came on a 22 yard 
pass from IVlike Walker to Steve Barrios and on a one yard run by David 
Abercrombie, the first rushing touchdown by LSU had given up in 12 games. 
David Abercrombie rushed for 29 yards against the Tigers to bring his season 
rushing total to 993 yards, a figure surpassed only by Eddie Price in 76 years 
of Tulane football history. 

-G.P.L. 



After observing the emotional outpouring 

that had preceded the LSU game, and 

having witnessed the team's reactions to 

defeat on all three of the road losses, I 

really didn't l<now what to expect in the 

way of emotion as the team returned to 

the ioclter room after the game. What I 

least expected to happen, however, was 

the undiplomatic way in which one of 

the assistant coaches bodily threw John 

James and myself out of the locker 

room just prior to Coach Pittman's talk 

with the squad. That all of our camera 

equipment and our tape recorder lay idle 

while Pittman spoke to his team hurt me 

almost as much as did the loss itself. 

After the speechmaking was over, 

however, we were again permitted to 

re-enter the locker room. I was 

approached ftrst by junior tailback Maxie 

LeBlanc, who oftered what I thought to 

be an extremely sincere apology for 

what had just happened. The next few 

minutes seemed an eternity as I went 

from one side of the room to the other, 

very quietly conveying whatever words 

my already choked voice could deliver. 

The facial expressions of the players 

varied, because each probably took this 

loss ever so much more deeply than he 

had any other, and the way that it 

attacked the senses was, to me, a very 

frightening, yet moving experience. 

Finally I came to rest on the floor beside 

my cameras and the tape recorder. 

I must have stayed there for five or ten 

minutes or longer, and was enveloped 

with that same emotional draining that 

the team was going through. I then 

gathered everything together and left for 

a duration of about 40 minutes. When I 

returned I found Rick Kingrea still In 

uniform, sitting by his locker. At this 

point, I believe he was aware of the 

Liberty Bowl bid, but that couldn't have 

been what was on his mind. The Baton 

Rouge senior and team captain for two 

years running, had lost— his dream of 

beating his hometown rivals had been 

shattered. As a photographer, perhaps I 

should have taken a picture. But, the 

thought was stricken from my mind 

almost immediately, ft simply wasn't the 

thing to do. I had too much respect. 







»-^?r^*r*- tfl^.Ji^-', 



C-%'J 



I»i£f{'<' 



-M.A. 




The Morning 

After 

to the Day 

Before 



Some people didn't find out about 

it until they read the Sunday 

sports section of the Picayune that 

following morning. But word 

generally got around during the 

night that Tulane had indeed 

received an invitation to play in the 

Liberty Bowl. The news was 

received by many as though it 

were a cruel joke (the type which 

only an LSU fan would dream up), 

and by others as first aid relief 

from the pains which a true Tulane 

fan suffers after seeing another 

LSU game end with Tulane on the 

short end of the scoreboard. 





Few fans, however, would ever 
realize what a large role Lady Luck 
played in securing the invitation. 
First, one must realize that one of 
the principal teams being 
considered by the Liberty Bowl's 
selection committee, the University 
of Florida, had just barely lost to 
the University of Miami earlier that 
same day That a Gator receiver 
tripped over his own feet on 
Miami's five yard line, and a 
desperation field goal attempt 
which followed from the Miami 15 
somehow went wide must not be 
overlooked. Second, the Director 
of the Liberty Bowl Festival 
Association, Bud Dudley, after 
witnessing the North Carolina 
white-washing, had committed 
himself to attend the LSU-Tulane 
contest. Consider what Dudley 
must have thought as our defense 



denied the Orange Bowl bound 
Tigers late in the fourth quarter 
when they took over with a first 
and goal situation (when any other 
team would have probably 
succumbed.) This "Year of the 
Green " team had just stopped one 
of the strongest ground-based 
offenses in the country. Dudley 
was so impressed— he didn't even 
bother to confer with any of his 
committee members. 

Regardless of the 'if's and 'but's of 
the situation, Tulane was finally 
going to a bowl. What ensued 
during the days that followed and 
the frivolity of preparing for a 
'nationally televised game" will 
probably amuse people as much 
as the game itself would. The 
cheerleaders? They had to get new 
uniforms Of course, they wouldn't 



be ready until a few days before 
the game, so all the publicity 
photos were taken in the old 
outfits And the Alumni? They 
concerned themselves with the 
planning of a mid-winter Mardi 
Gras. While Bea Field's mystical 
krewe worked out the official 
scheduling for the upcoming 
festivities, Ted Demuth and the 
skeletal Tulane band were faced 
with the problem of putting 
together an eight-minute half-time 
show, to be seen by millions of 
sports fans everywhere! The 
resulting talent hunt swelled the 
bands' size past 70 (with many of 
the new members eventually 
staying with the band for the 
duration of the year.) 

Next came the problem of 
transportation and timing Various 
groups and organizations, 
including the Athletic Department 
Greenbackers. and the Alumni 
Association sponsored charter 
package plans via jet. bus. and 
train. 

Over at the ticket office, more than 
7.000 tickets were sold (at S7.50 
each), with more than 3,000 sales 
coming on the first day. The 
Hullabaloo determined that the 
game would, or could mean as 
much as S190.000 to the 
University, with the greatest 
portion drawn from the television 
broadcast rights The Alumni 
krewe further determined that their 
festivities would need a few extras 
to please the old grads who would 
be making the pilgrimage to 
Memphis How about an official 
"hostess? " to act as Hospitality 
Queen? Why. of course! Enter Bev 
Bennett, Homecoming Queen. And 
how about some singers to keep 
them happy during the Friday 
evening banquet and the Saturday 
morning buffet. Enter the 
Tulanians and Director Leiand 
Bennett . . 

Meanwhile, game-time 
approacheth— the students began 
to hear strange things about the 
fabled Peabody Hotel, and about 
the pet ducks that parade m and 
out of the elevators and loiter 
around the lobby fountain. By 
Friday. December 11th. a good 
portion of the University had 
disappeared from campus with 
close to 2,500 students and faculty 
adjourning to Memphis. (Few 
people, however, were able to see 
the Peabody ducks. It seems as 
though their metabolism got 
fowled up that weekend.) 

-MA. 




^F^ 


■1 


If 




■ 


■ 


^^^HHSk ' ^^ 




1 




1 


I 


f 


^ 






r^^l 


1 



Memphis 
/dec. 11th 



Tulane Football fans came out of 

the woodwork in droves to 

descend on Memphis' proud, old, 

Peabody Hotel, a 12 story 

structure that served as the 

Green Wave Liberty Bowl 

Headquarters. Alumni, faculty, 

students, and plain old gridiron 

fanatics came together and gave 

the Peabody a night of 

merrymaking that left its veteran 

staff wide-eyed in disbelief. "You 

people sure know how to have 

fun," an elderly elevator 

remarked as another mob of 

passengers debarked to join an 

already packed lobby. And the 

game hadn't even started yet. 

-G.P.L. 




PAGE 28 / Varsity Sports 



J 






/ PAGE 29 




Memphis Memorial Stadium 

/december 12th 



"It's like I told you yesterday: These people think 

that they have quite an advantage over our ball 

club. They're a big, strong bunch of people and 

they think they're a tremendous football team, but I 

guarantee you that hitting will equalize that size in 

a hurry. We've played big football teams this year 

and we've come out with the hitting edge, and 

we've won. So that's exactly what we've got to do 

out there today, is go out and get after their ass 

and play our ball game." 

—Coach Pittman 



Appropriately, the nationally ranked defensive unit 

that was largely responsible for getting Tulane into 

its first bowl game in 31 years got to start the game 

when Colorado won the toss and elected to receive. 

After an exchange of punts, the Buffaloes gained 

possession on their own 12, and cranked up a 43 

yard drive that reached into Tulane territory. With a 

first and ten situation at the Tulane 45, sophomore 

defensive end Randy Lee made one of the key 

defensive plays of the game as he nailed Colorado 

quarterback Paul Arendt for an eight yard loss 

before Arendt could pitch out. 

Colorado tried its first pass of the afternoon on 

the next play. Rick Kingrea intercepted it for Tulane 

at midfield, returning it to the Colorado six yard line 

as a partisan Memphis crowd went wild. Three 

thrusts at the mammoth Colorado defensive line left 

Tulane two yards short of paydirt and Head Coach 

Jim Pittman sent sophomore Lee Gibson into the 

game to boot a 19 yard field goal. 

The Green Wave's 3-0 lead was short-lived as 

Colorado drove 68 yards with the ensuing kickoff to 

set up a 22 yard field goal that sent the two teams 

into the locker room at halftime in a 3-3 deadlock. 




PAGE 30 / Varsity Sports 



I 



tKilf^}^JWA 



"W< 



SEC 8 



lii 



'Ifii — 




JS^. 



SEC It 



f^^ 



\i 



.■"^i 



,'C-i ^l~ 



^ i 




'■^'^ 



■^'?Stf, 



uv 



"7* 



r^^' 



^^ 



r^ 



»=^ t- is'^ijj^i" 1 





PAGE 32 / Vaksity Sposts 




Backed by a beefed-up version of Tulane's student band. Frankie 
Assunto and the Dukes of Dixieland warmed up Tulanes portion 
of the halftime show with an impromptu Dixieland jazz concert. Actor 
Ed Nelson, a Tulane alumnus, narrated the proceedings as the 
Green Waves all volunteer band whooped it up in the background. 

The Liberty Bowl Association's portion of the halftime ceremonies 
featured the usual patriotic motif, with Pat O'Brien reciting Wash- 
ington's Prayer for Our Country while the West Point Glee Club 
performed in the background. The Liberty Bowl halftime show 
always ends with a rendition of God Bless America and the waving 
of thousands of minature American flags by the fans in attendance, 
a spectacle that came over with amazing sincerity in spite of the 
fact that public display of such sentiment is not as fashionable 
as it used to be. 



/ PAGE 33 



David Abercrombie gathered in the second half 
kickoff for Tulane at his own four, headed for the 
left sideline, found daylight, and 65 yards later the 
Green Wave had the heavily favored Buffaloes on 
the run. Tulane decided to challenge the hefty 
Colorado defense on the ground and the strategy 
worked. Fullback Bob Marshall roared through the 
right side of his offensive line for successive runs 
of 16 and 13 yards, setting up a first and goal 
situation at the two yard line for the Wave. A fine 
block by Marshall cleared the path for Abercrombie 
on the next play as Tulane's tailback bulled over 
right guard, putting the Green Wave ahead to stay. 





PAGE 34 / Varsity Sports 







ikt 



1 



The rest of the third quarter turned into a tight 
defensive struggle with each team managing only 
one first down. However, Tulane changed all that 
on its first possession of the fourth period. Aided 
by a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty on the Co- 
lorado bench. Tulane took over the Buffalo 42 yard 
line and marched to paydirt as Marshall and Aber- 
crombie carried the football on all eleven plays of 
the drive. In its two remaining possessions, Co- 
lorado's offense failed to get past the Tulane 47 
yard line, and the clock ticked a 17-3 Tulane win 
into history. 

-GPL. 






/ PAGE 35 




"Men, I've got to say thank you for the greatest thing that's ever happened to me. 

I appreciate and love every one of you, and you've given us a great season. You've 

done an outstanding job for us and I love every one of you. Bless your hearts. . . . 

let's have a good time tonight!" 

—Coach PIttman 

"I can't keep this ball. This is for Tulane University. We beat the hell out of 
Colorado. Not one man did it, not two men, not three men. The whole 55 that 
dressed out, and everybody that worked all year for this. When we came up here, we 
were nothing. . . . And we showed'em we were something when we finished." 

—Rick Kingrea 




PAGE 36 / Varsity Spokts 



It was a long, slow journey back, but 
Tulane football finally arrived in 1970. 
The winning season, the bowl bid. 
and the victory over Colorado before 
a national television audience, came 
at a time when Tulane football sorely 
needed two things: money and 
friends. 

The payoff for Tuiane's participation 
in the Liberty Bowl reached well into 
six figures and the teams impressive 
performance convinced the ABC 
network to include the Green Wave's 
1971 clash with Georgia Tech on 
their regular season schedule. The 
result: another sizable extra payday, 
and a more solvent athletic 
department. 

Direct financial considerations aside, 
a successful football program is a 
rallying point for alumni, alumni with 
the resources to considerably aid the 
University's financial plight. Not many 
old grads are going to get excited 
about an academician's latest 
publication and few understand or 
sympathize with the aims of a 
student movement. But a winning 
football team can revive the spirit 
and loosen the purse strings. 
The Memphis joy ride could come to 
a screeching halt, however, if the 
football success does not continue. 
The important need to maintain 
momentum caused a good deal of 
concern when Head Coach Jim 
Pittman rendered his resignation two 
days after the Liberty Bowl and 
departed for a new job (and raise) at 
Texas Christian University. 
After a week and a half search, 
Arkansas State Head Coach Bennie 
Ellender, a Tulane Alumnus and 
NCAA small college Coach of the 
Year in 1970, agreed to take up the 
post. The squad responded well to 
Ellender and his new staff in their 
spring workouts, and it is obvious 
that the soft spoken newcomber has 
inherited a much healthier situation 
than his predecessor fell heir to in 
his first season. The 18,000 fans who 
turned out for the fvlay 1 spring game 
would indicate that things will indeed 
be much greener in the immediate 
future. 

-GPL. 




/ P.4GE 3' 





PAGE 38 / Vaksity Sports 



Basketball 





/ PAGE 39 






GEORGE FERGUSON 
HAROLD SYLVESTER 
JIM KWIATOWSKI 
MIKE BILLINGSLEY 
RICK MILLER 
JOHN SZPONAR 
MIKE DRESSLER 
MIKE HENRY 
JOHN SUTTER 
DAN IMMING 
ED HARRIS 
DAVE ALSPAUGH 
STUART KURTY 
WAYNE GARRET 





"The Year of the Green" turned pale for the 
1970-71 edition of the Tulane basketball team as 
the roundballers bounced their way to a 
deflating 8-18 season record. 

Starting off with a spurt. Tulane rode the 
scoring and rebounding of John Sutter and 
Harold Sylvester, and picked up four wins in 
their first six contests. Green Wave optimism 
was short-lived however, as the team dropped 
nine decisions in a row to watch their record 
plummet to 4-11. Doing most damage during this 
time was a disastrous road trip over the 
holidays. 

Coach Ralph Pedersons charges came out of 
their lackadaisical shells only twice the entire 
season. Playing before the home crowd on both 
occasions, the Wave took the measure of LSU 

and Florida State 

Against the Bengals. Harold Sylvester had the 
best night of his disappointing career at Tulane. 
Harold popped in 33 points and pulled down 15 
rebounds to spark the Wave's 93-86 demolishing 
of the Tigers. 

Highly-regarded independent Florida State was 
also unfortunate to catch the Greenies on a hot 
night. Inspired by the stunned home crowd. 
George Ferguson. Mike Henry, and company 
opened up an early 20 point lead and coasted to 
an easy 88-69 victory. 

Other than these two efforts, the team showed 
little class in dropping 18 games The Greenies 
seemed to lack conditioning, drilling, and 
everything else that makes a top-notch 
basketball squad. 



/ PAGE 41 



PAGE 42 / Varsity Sports 



Under fire at midseason, Coach Pederson 

made the decision to retire from coaching at the 

end of the season. The decision seemed a good 

one as Coach Pederson's heart condition and 

temperament seemed to preclude Tulane from 

ever reaching basketball excellence under his 

tutelage. 

For his replacement, the Athletic Advisory 

Board stayed at home and picked Dick Longo, 

the freshman coach. Coach Longo's credentials 

merited the shot at the top job. In the past two 

campaigns, Longo's charges have posted a 37-4 

record, including a 19-2 worksheet for the past 

season. Record-wise, the frosh team was ranked 

among the best in the nation. 

Coach Longo will be bringing a combination 

of youth, imagination, and experience to the job 

next year. In coaching for the past 12 years, the 

trademark of Longo's teams have been 

conditioning and hustle, accented by verve on 

the court. An innovator, Coach Longo has the 

talent for molding winning teams out of 

disparate spirits. 

Looking at the upcoming season optimistically. 

Coach Longo is convinced that he can not only 

bring Tulane a winner in basketball, but he fully 

expects to field a post season tournament team 

in the near future. The future looks Green for 

the basketball team. 



—Tony LaNasa 
A&S '71 




/ PAGE 43 





SEATED: 

GUY WEINBERG 

PEGE STERNBERGER 

ERIC KIESEL 

standing: 

MIKE BALLOTTI 

AZILE MANSEN 

BRUCE DANNER 

GREG SCHRAMEL 

COACH PAUL PRINCE 

BETSY ADAMS 

STEVE DANNER 

RINGERS: 

BEV ANDERSON 

GAIL PERRY 

PEGGY ROBERTS 



Since the arrival of Coacli Paul Prince in September of 

1969, gymnastics has slowly been rising in popularity on the 

Tulane campus. Today there are not only men's and 

women's gymnastics classes in the P.E. department, but 

there is also the addition of a neophyte gymnastics team, 

which has started to compete on the inter-collegiate level. 

The only factor which keep the team members going is 

the individual appreciation each member has for the sport 

and the encouragement of Coach Prince. Since the 

allocation of funds from the University Is minimal, additional 

money which Is needed to cover the team's expenses is 

earned by team members themselves through teaching and 

other money making projects. Should the Athletic 

department budget include adequate funds for the support 

of the team's development in the next season, the outlook 

for the success of the sport in the future would be much 

brighter; the key is In finding those adequate funds. 

—Bruce Danner 
A&S '72 



PAGE 44 / Varsity Sports 





/ PACE 45 





EVENT 


TIME 


TULANE RECORD HOLDER 


50 


YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 
YDS. 


FREE STYLE 
FREE STYLE 
FREE STYLE 
FREE STYLE 
FREE STYLE 
BREAST STROKE 
BREAST STROKE 
BACK STROKE 
BACK STROKE 
BUTTERFLY 
BUTTERFLY 
INDIVIDUAL MEDLEY 
MEDLEY RELAY 
FREE STYLE RELAY 


'21 4' 


^ LARRY CURRAN ' 


100 


'48.3' 


' LARRY CURRAN " 


200 


■■1^ 


' SAM MILNE ' 


500 


muam 


' SAM MILNE 


1000 


' DON BARNES 


100 


1039' 


' SAM MINE 


200 


flUBiC 


^JOHN ROUQUETTE ' 


100 


• • 


' BILLY WEIDNER ' 


200 


' BILLY WEIDNER ' 


100 


'535 ' 


' CHUCK O'BRIEN * 


200 




' CHUCK O'BRIEN ' 


200 


' CHUCK O'BRIEN 


400 


•3:42.5' 


^BILirWEIMER ■• CHliCll O'BWEII -.' 


400 


'3168' 


- scon KiuFraui ■ ■ cuis petekm ■ , 

STEVE JOHNSGK ' StM MIINE 












t- 














PAGE 46 / Varsity Sports 



Swimming 



With heavy attention focused on such sports 
as football, basketball, and baseball at Tulane. 
It's not surprising that a sport like swimming 
rarely gets noticed by people other than its own 
participants and a few close followers. It 
doesn't make money. No professional swim 
teams exist for swimmers to join after gradua- 
tion. Yet. when a team rises from the depths 
of mediocrity to a position of power among its 
peers, and does so with relatively little support 
from the school, there must be some solid 
reason for it. 

In this case, the "reason" is Coach C. Ri- 
chard Bower. Since taking the position as swim 
coach two years ago. Dick Bower has cata- 
pulted his team from a 6-6 record to successive 
season marks of 10-5. and this year 17-3, yield- 
ing only to powerhouses Alabama and Florida 
State, and a one point loss to South Florida. 

The record board has been changed 32 times 
this year and only one record out of 1 7 remains. 
Of the 16 new records, half are owned or 
shared by swimmers not on athletic aid of any 
type. That these swimmers have achieved this 
level is attributable only to Bower's ability as 
a coach. The team respects him not only be- 
cause of his even rule and discipline, but also 
because of his ability and knowledge of the 
sport. In twenty years of coaching, he has met 
with people in all aspects of the sport, stayed 
abreast of current techniques and innovations, 
and has experimented extensively with his own 
theories. 

Under Bower's training, two Tulane swim- 
mers. Scott Kaufman and Sam Milne, qualified 
for the NCAA championships this year. Several 
others iust missed the cutoff times. The team 





/ P.\GE 47 



Itself finished second behind Florida State in 
the Independent Southern Intercollegiate 
Championships this year. 

Two years ago, Tulane's team consisted of 
two returning varsity swimmers and a handful 
of good and average high school swimmers. 
Building it to Its present level of strength was 
a remarkable job, but if Tulane is to enjoy 
national prominence In swimming, we will have 
to start recruiting high school swimmers of high 
ability. Doing this will not be possible without 
additional aid In the form of scholarships. 

We have the coach and the making of a great 
team, but we'll need the better high schoolers 
to build this team into a national power, which 
can be done with additional aid. Tulane has 
the potential for gaining fame as a swimming 
power— to Ignore It would be senseless. 

—Dana Abbott 
A&S 72 




SITTING; 

SAM MILNE 

CHUCK O'BRIEN 

BILLY WEIDNER 

DANA ABBOTT 

CHAMP HOLLAND 

DONNY BARNES 

ON THE BOARD: 
SCOTT KAUFFMAN 

STANDING: 

COACH DICK BOWER 



HUDSON SMITH 

DON SPECK 

MIKE MCKEEVER 

CRAIG PETERSON 

JOHN WILSON 

ANDY SMITH 

BILL SLOAN 

WILEY PATTERSON 

JIM HARVEY 

ON THE TRAMP: 
BOBBY LANGDON 
ROBERT FLEMING 




PAGE 48 / Varsity Sports 



I 



i^fl^ir^: 






PAGE 50 / A^ARSITY- SpOKTS 




Track 



The 1971 track season has to be considered m some respects 
a great success, yet in others a failure Three individual 
school records— one mile. 4:04,4. Bill Brown; three mile. 
14:27. Taylor Aultman: and shot put. 54'1". Steve Meyer- 
were set, as well as records in the distance medley and (our mile relays Tulane 
scored its first-ever victories at both Florida and Texas Relays, with the (our mile 
relay team of Fred Basha, Jud Tomlin. Bob Sahuque. and Bill Brown winning at Flori- 
da, and Brown capturing the open mile at Texas. 

Now the disappointments: early in the season Coach Oelkers had dreams of a great 
distance medley relay. Then, at the Astrodome in February. Mark Stonecipher severely 



/ PAGE 51 



pulled a hamstring, and was lost for 
theseason. WithoutStonecipher, the 
first three legs of Sahuque, Mark 
Welch, and Brown led, but then lost 
on the anchor leg as Villanova won 
in world record time. The distance 
medley never again materialized with 
this kind of performance, and proved 
to be a great source of disappoint- 
ment for Coach Oelkers as the sea- 
son progressed. Then later, during 
the outdoor season, Harry Moon, 
long and triple jumper, finally getting 
back in shape after being the victim 
of injuries for two years, once again 
suffered a serious injury, a hyper-ex- 
tension behind the right knee, cur- 
tailing his season. At the time of this 
writing, there are several meets left, 
and everyone is hoping to improve 
their performances. Brown has al- 
ready qualified for the NCAA na- 
tionals in Seattle in June. 

On the basis of team results, the 
Greenies once again were weak. I 
feel that this warrants some expla- 
nation. Tulane, being very limited in 
funds, has never furnished enough 
money to recruit and sign a real track 
team. Therefore, Tulane's team con- 
sists of a few athletes, usually fairly 
proficient in their events, but unable 
to pick up enough points to score 




• .j&W.a'' »^^ 



well in a team meet. Tulane's team 
is, for instance, about one quarter 
the size of LSU's. What might be 
done aboutthis, I don't know; maybe 
things will remain as they are, maybe 
they will improve, or maybe track will 
eventually be phased out. 

Coach Oelkers said that he felt the 
season as a whole was fairly suc- 
cessful, despite the number of ill- 
nesses and injuries which slowed 
people down (Stonecipher, Moon, 
Kevin Hammar to injuries, B. J. Lyon 
and Welch to sickness). He added 
that he expected improvements in 
performances during the remainder 
of the spring season, and that he was 
enthusiastic about next year, with 
almost the entire team returning. 

Mark Welch added, "I think we 
need more girls out to watch track 
practice." 

— Bill Brown 
A&S '72 



an:^3t 



> si«<»fe&!ScJi>aoS3a:*— "Cufci* 



SITTING: 

BOBBY SAHUQUE 

B. J. LYON 

HARRY MOON 

STEVE BROOKSHER 

BILL BROWN 

TAYLOR AULTMAN 

FRED BASHA 

IRWIN MANDELKERN 

STANDING: 

MARK WELCH 

COACH JOHN OELKERS 

FRANK MURPHY 

STEVE MEYER 

MARK HOLT 

KEVIN HAMMAR 

JUDSON TOMLIN 

GARY WEISS 

lapped: 

MARK MARLEY 

MARK STONECIPHER 



PAGE 52 / Varsity Sports 







/ PACE 53 



Tennis 



Coach Emmett Fare's netters 

bounced back from their first 

losing season in ten years to post 

a 7-5-1 mark in 1971. The talent 

drought that has befallen the dean 

of American college tennis 

coaches in recent years was 

complicated by the loss of top 

singles player John Williams due 

to a pre-season leg injury. 

Sophomore Andy Shields came on 

to post an 8-6 record in the 

number one singles spot vacated 

by Williams. 



The brightest spot for the 1971 

squad was the play of mammoth 

Sean Terry, a six foot-ten inch 

freshman with a basketball 

grant-in-aid, who came on to 

record a 5-0 singles record and 

teamed with Alex Coxe for a 9-1 

mark in doubles play. After a late 

start due to basketball competition, 

Terry moved up to the number 

three singles spot in winning five 

consecutive matches. The ability 

wore thin after these two as Pare, 

who now has an unbelievable 

268-52-18 college coaching 

record, had to settle for another 

average season. 

— Gayle Letulle 
Law 72 



PAGE 54 / Varsity Sports 








W&^^^M 



i: 



SEATED 

ANDY SHIELDS 

SEAN TERRY 

LINDA TUERO 

ALEX COXE 

STEVE SCHULTZ 

STANDING: 

MIKE ZYGMUNT 

LEON MARKS 

JOE GETTYS 

COACH EMMETT PARE 

ROBIN SANDAGE 

MARK HARNER 




/ PAGE 51) 




PAGE 56 / Varsity Sports 




Despite the mediocre seasons which 
the tennis team has gone through in 
the last tew years, national 
recognition has once again come to 
Tulane via the tennis court. Linda 
Tuero. the first female to receive an 
athletic scholarship at Tulane. has 
won three major national titles in the 
last two years. She won the U.S. 
Women's Amateur Championship 
twice, in 1969 and 1970, and then 
added the US Clay Court Open for 
Women to her list of achievements 
last August. Although she is the 
number two ranked person in the 
National Women's Amateur ratings at 
present, she holds only the number 
eleven spot in the Women's Open 
Division (this includes professionals). 
She does have a better record 
however, than some of the women 
ranked ahead of her. 

Linda's situation is an increasingly 
difficult one in that she is one of the 
few girls playing competitively, while 
still a student. Most of the other 
women have either never gone to 
college, or have quit in order to 
devote full time to perfecting their 
game. This has been a handicap to 
Linda's national rankings because 
she must divide her time between 
studies and tennis. She loves tennis, 
but to her, it is a matter of priorities, 
and right now, she feels there are 
more important things to accomplish. 

Linda is a unique member of the 
Tulane Tennis Squad in that she is 
the only girl on it. This had 
unfortunately, affected her chances 
of playing frequent intercollegiate 
matches. Some schools refuse to 
match their boys against her, while 
others, like those within the S.E.C. or 
the Big Ten, are prohibited from 
playing girls by their conference 
rules. Because of this, Linda's record 
as a member of the Tulane team was 
three wins against no defeats this 
year, and eight wins and one defeat 
in three years. 

Being the only girl on the squad 
could present some very frustrating 
difficulties. The only people she can 
practice against are boys. Linda 
readily admits that boys are much 
better than girls because they are 
bigger, stronger, and faster. Shots 
which would have been sure scores 
against a girl, are easily returned to 
her by the boys. She must constantly 
remind herself that had she been 
playing girls, she would be faring 
much better. 





Outside of these difficulties. Linda 
has had a tremendous effect on the 
whole squad Both players and 
coach agree that she is an 
inspiration to all. Coach Pare says of 
her, "She gives up size, strength, 
and speed to nearly everyone she 
plays, yet she seldom loses She has 
a wonderful attitude, and wins 
through her concentration and her 
will to fight. I know there are times 





when this attitude rubs off on the 
rest of the squad ' 

As for her teammates, they do not 
mind playing against her at all. To 
them, she is just one of the guys 
And most would rather practice 
against her than anyone else on the 
team. She is steady, and returns 
most shots during workouts. Besides, 
playing her can often be amusing: 
she s easy to drop shot. 



-Tony Fontana 
A&S 72 



/ PAGE 57 






PAGE 58 / Varsity Sports 






•i:*. 



' '^^/>l^3t Tulane remains 
^^^/l I little more than an 
exercise in futility, quite the same 
condition that has prevailed for 
several years . . . The outlook is 
bleak." So read the description of 
the golf team in the 1969 Jamb. 
But since that time the Green 
Wave golfers have changed 
coaches, courses, and their losing 
attitude. 

With the hiring of Jim Hart, pro at 
Lakewood Country Club, golf at 
Tulane has seen a remarkable 
resurgence. With four freshmen, 
tw/o sophomores, and one senior, 
the Green Wave recorded its first 
winning season, 14-8, in several 
years. After a loss to U.S.L. in the 
early spring, Tulane golfers won 
nine of ten dual meets. The major 
highlight of the year was a tri-meet 
victory over Loyola and L.S.U.N.O. 
Although tournament golf was not 
as strong as it could have been, 
the record was extraordinary for a 
golf team that had won four 
matches in the past three years. 

Contrary to the words of the 1969 
Jamb, the outlook has never been 
brighter. 

-Ken Weil 
A&S 74 




• • fJ^ ..♦♦•• ♦♦♦♦ • ♦ 

'* * f •rz, . \ •* • ^ • • ' * 



♦♦•♦••♦♦ 
♦♦♦•♦♦ 




back: 

ALAN SPROWLS 
MAURY PICHELOUP 
SCOTT NICHOLAS 
TED BISKIND 
COACH JIM HART 

trapped: 
KEN WEIL 




Baseball 



Running into a rainless season for 
the first time in years, the 1971 
edition of the Tulane baseball 
team started and finished strong in 
posting a 16-10 season record. 
Coach Milt Retif fielded a young 
team this year, one that was long 
on experience, but short on depth. 
The only seniors in the starting 
lineup were catcher Butch Raley, 
second baseman Ned Reese, and 
third baseman Marty Donovan. 
On the mound, the Wave ran into 
deep trouble. Despite having a fine 
front line of Bobby Thomas, Chris 
Winter, and Ed Bernard, the loss 
of Steve Walton for the entire 
season left the Wave in a bind for 
relief pitching. Realistically, the 
dearth in the bullpen probably cost 
Tulane four or five victories this 
year. 

For the past two years. Coach 
Retif had been criticized for not 
scheduling more games, and thus 
losing out on the chance to 
compete in the regional playoffs 
because other teams had more 
victories. This year, the 26-game 
slate was a godsend. With only 
freshman John Ryan and outfielder 
Don Hartman available for pitching 



PAGE 60 / Varsity Sports 







FRONT: 

JOHN MUELLER 

DOUG ROBERT 

WARD PURDUM 

GARY LIVINGSTON 

STAN TREITLER 

BRUCE BURGA 

CHUCK DUNBAR 

GARY RAY 

middle: 

CURT ZIMMERMAN 

STEVE WALTON 

BOB THOMAS 

DON HARTMAN 

TOM GARDNER 



JOHN RYAN 
CARLOS CESPEDES 

BACK 

COACH MILT RETIF 

MARTY DONOVAN 

MIKE ROVAN 

GARY STRELAU 

EDDIE BARNARD 

GEORGE KUBACH 

GARY BERNARD 

BUTCH RALEY 

CHRIS WINTER 

BOB WHITMAN 

COACH ANDREW GANGOLF 

NED REESE 



/ PAGE 61 




PAGE 62 / Varsity Sports 







duty, the Wave would have been 
in dire straits with a 40-game slate. 
Defensively, the Greenies played 
adequate to good ball all season. 
One of the bright spots here was 
the double play combination of 
Ned Reese and Gary Bernard. 
Against the Miami Hurricanes, the 
pair teamed up to initiate three 
double plays in one game Overall. 
however, the Wave had poor team 
speed, and this showed up several 
times in the outfield on deep fly 
balls. 

Except for the day when they 
shelled Loyola for 20 hits and 16 
runs, the Wave bats were quiet 
most of the season. A good 
example of the ineffectiveness of 
the Tulane hitters was pitcher 
Bobby Thomas. He finished the 
year with a 5-4 record, and had to 
pitch four shutouts to do it. Three 
of Thomas' losses came when the 
Greenies failed to score a run 
against the opposition. 

One bright exception to this 
blight at the plate was the hitting 
of centerfielder Gary Livingston, 
who led the Wave with a .380 
batting average, and pummelled 
the opposing pitcher unmercifully 
during the second half of the 
season. In the Loyola series. 
Livingston had nine hits in 12 at 



bats with two home runs and six 
runs batted in. The only other 
Greenine stickman to hit over 300 
was right fielder Don Hartman. 
who hit .310 

Next year could be a tossup for 
the Wave as ace pitchers Thomas 
and Winter both graduate The 
pitching load would then fall upon 
the shoulders of John Ryan, Ed 
Bernard, and whoever Coach Retif 
can sign this summer. In the 
infield. Curt Zimmerman and Gary 
Bernard will be back to anchor the 
diamond, with Gary Livingston and 
his bat leading the outfield. 

In order to get Tulane back in 
shape to compete for national 
honors. Coach Retif will have to 
do some shoring up for the next 
season In addition to the need for 
more depth on the pitching 
mound. Retif will have to find 
some way to get more speed in 
the outfield and power at the 
plate. Finally, if he can find a 
suitable replacement for the 
departing Butch Raley at catcher. 
1972 might be a good season for 
the baseballers. 



—Tony LaNasa 
A&S 71 




TEAMS M 



™i^ 



■^ .'-^ 



BALL STMICE QUIT 



Baseball 



,V..-i 




t 






I 




football 



T.U. OPPONENT 

14 TEXAS TECH 

17 GEORGIA 

23 ILLINOIS 

6 CINCINNATI 

3 AIR FORCE 

24 N. CAROLINA 

6 GEORGIA TECH 

10 VANDERBILT 

31 MIAMI, FLA. 

N.C. STATE 

L.S.U. 

17 COLORADO 



basketball 



T.U. OPPONENT 

77 NORTHWESTERN LA. 
75 CITADEL 
100 SOUTH DAKOTA 
60 HOUSTON 
89 TEXAS A & M 
109 INDIANA STATE 
79 L.S.U. 
77 WISCONSIN 
PURDUE 
OLD DOMINION 
66 XAVIER, OHIO 
I N. CAROLINA 
I TEXAS 

GEORGIA TECH 
RICE 

FLORIDA STATE 
71 MIAMI (FLA.) 
66 MIAMI (OHIO) 
65 VALPARAISO 
93 L.S.U. 
81 UTAH STATE 
85 VIRGINIA TECH 
37 STETSON 
93 TAMPA 
^6 MARQUETTE 
74 GEORGIA TECH 



swimming 

T.U. OPPONENT 

51 L.S.U. 

52 RICE 42 
59 KENT STATE 54 
66 UNIV. of EVANSVILLE 45 
66 UNIV. OF MISSOURI (AT ROLLA) 47 
36 ALABAMA 77 
56 SOUTH FLORIDA 57 

65 MIAMI (FLORIDA) 48 
63 AUBURN 44 
55 UNIV. OF THE SOUTH 51 
62 'KENYON COLLEGE 33 

50 *SANTA BARBARA 45 

51 *MIAMI (FLORIDA) 44 

83 'FREDONIA (N.Y.) 12 
79 'BLOOMSBURG (PA.) 16 
73 L.S.U. 4e^ 
60 *E. CAROLINA UNIV. (N. Car.) 53 

66 VANDERBILT 47 
53 FLORIDA STATE 60 

84 GEORGIA TECH 26 
2nd INDEPENDENT SOUTHERN 

INTERCOLLEGIATE CHAMPIONSHIPS 

'TELEGRAPHIC MEET 



tennis 



T.U. OPPONENT 

FURMAN 
' RICE 

HOUSTON 
I TEXAS 

I SOUTH ALABAMA 
WILLIAM & MARY 
MICHIGAN STATE 
MISSISSIPPI STATE 
N.O. LAWN TENNIS 
MISSISSIPPI STATE 
I GEORGIA TECH 
1 FLORIDA STATE 

L.S.U. 
7 ALABAMA 



baseball 



T.U. 


OPPONENT 






304 


L.S.U.N.O. 


290 


311 


SOUTHERN MISS. 


290 


311 


MCNEESE 


331 


309 


SOUTHERN MISS. 


319 


308 


NICHOLLS STATE 


321 


9 


LOYOLA 


18 


3rd 


NICHOLLS QUADRANGULAR 


307 


SOUTHEASTERN 


324 


309 


SOUTHEASTERN 


305 


309 


LOYOLA 


313 


327 


L.S.U.N.O. 


307 


330 


SOUTHWESTERN 


298 


13th 


SENIOR BOWL TOURNEY 




412 


SOUTHWESTERN 


381 


396 


MCNEESE 


398 


16'/. 


LOYOLA 


lOVk 


4th 


TULANE INVITATIONAL 




401 


L.S.U.N.O. 382 S. ALA. 


407 


401 




421 


5th 


RICE INVITATIONAL 




8th 


SOUTHERN MISS. TOURNEY 


301 


LOYOLA 303 S. ILLINOIS 


308 


392 


SOUTH ALABAMA 


397 


381 


LOYOLA 383 L.S.U.N.O. 


389 


5th 


lA INTERCOLLEGIATE 





T.U. OPPONENT 

SPRING HILL 
SPRING HILL 
MURRAY STATE 
COAST GUARD ACADEMY 
COAST GUARD ACADEMY 
COAST GUARD ACADEMY 
SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI 
SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI 
SOUTH ALABAMA 
L.S.U.N.O. 
L.S.U.N.O. 
1 L.S.U. 

NORTHERN ILLINOIS 

BAYLOR 

BAYLOR 

XAVIER 

XAVIER 

MIAMI. FLA. 

MIAMI, FLA. 

MIAMI, FLA. 

LOYOLA 

LOYOLA 

LOYOLA 

L.S.U. 

CENTENARY 

CENTENARY 



*^ 



^m £GlU/f, ■* 0M6 j 



D^T F6CZ) ^/v/tt (Ja; 
THE ^HiiLS. 



C 



•gO^■'^: 





Sailing 



One of the few actively independent group; 
on campus is the Sailing Club, It's prograi 
is mainly centered on teaching interested 
students how to sail; the teachers are fello! 
students, and all plans of the club are mai 
by students under the direction of advisor 
Bob Mason. 

The training program has been quite 
effective this year. Novice sailors were 
organized into five groups with two skippei 
permanently at the head of each group. 
Wednesday night classroom instruction 
sessions were held along with weekend 
sails on the lake in Tulane boats. At the 
end of each semester the skippers 
organized a novice regatta, giving their 
students a chance to sail competitively ant 
test their training. 

Perhaps the best-known aspect of the 
Sailing Club is its Racing Team., Composet 
of the skippers who have become proficier 
enough at sailing and racing rules to quail- 
for competition, Tulane's team has been 
acknowledged as the best in the South am'' 
one of the best in the nation. The team ha 
captured the Douglas Cup and the Kennec 
Cup in 1970 and again this year, a feat 
which never before had been done by any 
school. In our own Sugar Bowl regatta, the 
Tulane team placed second only to San 
Diego State College, whose sailors 
specialize in dinghy sailing. Tulane will 
again send a team to the North American 
Dinghy Championships to be held in 
Annapolis, and also to the Women's 
Nationals at the Coast Guard Academy. 
Both contests are for national 
championships. 

—Sylvia Youj 
Newcomb ' 



PAGE 66 / Club Spokts 




1 GREG BERTUCCI 
2 /JOE JACKSON 
3 SYLVIA YOUNG 
4/TOM PLANCHARO 
5'BILLY BUDO 
6/BILL TARNEY 
7 /DAN NASH 
8/ LOUIS SWANN 
9/CAPT AHAB 
10/CLIFF GRIM 

11/POPEYE 
12'CAPT HOOK 
13/MIKE RELIHAN 
14 OLIVE OIL 
15/MARGO BRETZ 

16 VAN BOYETT 

17 MARCIA GUMPERTZ 

18 JOHN ORR 

19 PAT BOYLSTON 

20 CLAY DORRIS 

21 JOE DAVENPORT 

22 ROB ROBINSON 

23 WARREN TRASK 

24 BOB RUDERMAN 




/ PAGE 67 




^ .ri^r' 



*,^ 




At Newport. Rhode Island, the rallying cry ol the 1970 America's Cup 
was "Ficker is Quicker." It was inevitable that intercollegiate sailors 
modified that to "Dane's a Pain " Alter all. lots ol people have lathers 
.vho sail; lots ol people have lived near a lake all ol their lives: lots 
jf people have associated with some ol the top sailors in the country 
and learned Irom them, but it seems that only John Dane. Ill has used 
all ol these ellectively enough to t>e called "America's brightest hope 
for the 1972 Olympic gold medal in sailing " by everyone (rem Sports 
Illustrated to the Washington Post to our own Hullabaloo 

Sailors have been putting up with the civil engineering junior Irom Tulane 
since he won the 1967 Sears Cup. representative of the North American 
lunior sailing championship He first created waves in intercollegiate 
circles by earning regatta low point skipper in the 1969 Nonh American 
Dinghy Championship when just a freshman Since then. Dane and his 
crews from Tulane have handed bitter defeats to the top collegiate sailors 
and dominated intercollegiate large boat competition by winning the 
Douglas and Kennedy Cups for the past two years. 

The Douglas Cup. collegiate counterpart of the America's Cup and the 
intercollegiate match-racing championship, is sailed in Columbia 26's 
in Long Beach. California The record of the Tulane team in attaining 
these two championships is 14 wins and no losses. 

The Kennedy Cup is sailed at Annapolis. Maryland, in 44 foot yawls. 
and IS the symbol ol the intercollegiate big boat championship The 
two victories in this event are won over 20 ol the linest intercollegiate 
sailing teams in the country. 

But Dane is a pain as lar as the rest ol the sailing world is concerned. 
too For starters, he won the 1969 North American Soling Championship. 
the Canadian Soling Championship, and the 1970 British Soling National 
Championship He finished as runner-up in the 1970 World Soling Class 
Championship having defeated that legendary Dane. Paul Elvstrom But 
Elvstrom got his revenge when he forced our Dane to take second place 
in the Olympic preview. Kiel Week Soling competition m Germany It 
must be pointed out. however, that most people simply consider Elvstrom 
as the best sailor in the world today 

John does relax periodically, though Consider the summer of 1 969 when 
he "won the World Windmill class competition As much as anything. 
he did It for a friend who wanted to sell the championship boat Or 
there is the month he spent in Australia, all expenses paid, crewing 
for a friend in the Flying Dutchman World Championships 

It's fairly clear that John deserves his two year title of collegiate sailing 
All American and that Tulane can be justly proud of "Our Great Dane." 



-Kathy Kein 
Newcomb "72 




/ p.*cE 69 




Scuba 



The Tulane Scuba Club was formed at the beginning 

of the spring semester in 1970. The nature of the 

sport in this area made diving either inaccessible or 

prohibitively expensive except when attempted in 

fairly large groups. It was felt that formal organization 

would facilitate communication among the divers on 

campus. The club made several dives in the gulf off 

the coast of Louisiana that year, but because of the 

late start and the early end of the semester, there 

was little time to establish the necessary foundations 

for an efficient organization. 

This year, the club has expanded substantially. 

Although the membership is not large as yet, the 

present members are active and enthusiastic about 

the club and the sport. A number of diving 

expeditions took members to the Florida Coast at 

Destin, Pensacola, Tampa, and the Florida Keys, as 

well as to Florida's inland springs and rivers. In 

addition, the club has made one dive in the 

Carribbean off the coast of British Honduras and has 

another such trip planned for the end of this year. 

Aside from the recreational aspects of the club, 

however, it has a much more serious and vital 

function. Through the use of films and research on 

new techniques and equipment, the club helps keep 

its members informed about the latest advances in 

diving, making it safe to enjoy the sport. In addition 

to helping one another, the club members are active 

in assisting with scuba classes held at Tulane. This 

activity, besides aiding the novice divers, and keeping 

the club members in touch with the very latest and 

most professional information, serves as a 

promotional effort since these classes are the club's 

main source of membership. About thirty to forty 

percent of the students in the classes will become 

active club members, and by the end of the year, 

they will probably boost active membership to around 

fifty students. 




1 /JAMES MONEAL 

2/CATHY TRUSCOTT 

3/FRED BELL 

4/CARL LEEDY 

5/DOUG JOHNSON 

6/JAMES MOERS 

7/MIKE RACHELSON 

8/PHYLLIS NUGENT 

9/JAMES HARVEY 

10/MIKE KNAPP 

11 /ROGER FIELDS 

12/JEFF FLATER 

13/LISA GOLDBERG 

14/ERIC HITCHCOCK 

15/NIK BEDNARSKI 



PAGE 70 / Club Sports 



-Jim Harvey 
A&S '72 



1/TONI KNORR 

2 NANCY PATTERSON 

3 VICKY SHERROUSE 
4,PEGI BALLENGER 
5/JILL DUNCAN 

6 PRISSY STEWART 

7 JILL STUART 

8 MURIAL PLAMGREN 

9 JANE FAULKNER 

10 MUFFIN MAYER 

11 KAY HAAS 

12 VICKI REIKES 




The Barracuda Club originated in 1945 
primarily as a class in water ballet, 
emphasizing water skills such as 
synchronized stroking and floating. 
Recently, the group has been reorganized 
as a club. Competitive tryouts have 
produced greater team strength and 
enthusiasm for the art form as a means of 
creative expression. As such, the emphasis 
has moved from a "sport" club to a 
competitive team. By participating in the 
Southern Aquatic Art Symposium in 
Greenville. South Carolina, in November, 
the Barracudas worked with teams from 
other universities and were introduced to 
new ideas In synchronized swimming. 
This was a year of experimenting with 
various approaches to creative expression 
in the water. After thoroughly researching 
the history of voodoo in New Orleans, a 
seven-member team performed during the 
Easter break in the International Festival of 
Aquatic Art in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Their 
number "Voodoo Rites on the Bayou" was 
enthusiastically received by critics and 
audience alike. 

This year, funds were utilized to improve 
the program by purchasing necessary 
training equipment and costumes. The 
1971-72 program Includes several team 
competition trips and a spring show. The 
Barracuda Club Is especially interested in 
incorporating strong male swimmers for 
mixed duets and team numbers. This Idea 
will provide new challenges for the club. 

—Jill Duncan 
Newcomb '73 



Barracuda 




/ PAGE 71 



J. Wayne Anderson 
David A. Marcello 
James A. Hayes 




National 
Moot Court 



The National IVloot Court is an annual competition in whicli tine participating 
teams, representing more than 100 law schools from throughout the nation, 
argue a moot point of law before a panel of judges. The case is presented 
as an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The question for 
1970-71 involved a defamation of character suit in which a journalist claimed 
a right to withhold the names of his confidential sources of information. 

The competition is staged in two phases, the first being a series of regional 
competitions throughout the nation. This year the School of Law hosted the 
regional competition for Region VII— a region comprised of several Southern 
states. The moot court team representing Tulane advanced from the regionals 
into the final rounds of competition in New York. The team advanced to the 
semifinal round, after having been paired against Nebraska, Stanford, and 
Northwestern University. Tulane was defeated in the semi-final round by Ohio 
State, the ultimate winner of the competition. 

J. Wayne Anderson 
Law '71 



PAGE 72 / Club Sports 



In 1848. with a donation of S500 to establish an award (or outstanding elocutron on campus, 
the Glendy Burke Society was founded The donor was a local businessman, a contemporary 
o( Paul Tulane. The Glendy Burke Debate Society is the oldest debate in the South and \he 
third oldest in the nation. It has a long tradition and claims many famous alumni 

Glendy Burke began this year in a rebuilding program, but by the time mid-season came along. 
Tulane had already established itself by a strong winning trend The argumentation centered 
around the topic of Federal wage-and-price controls, with intercollegiate competition done at 
the tournament level. 

The tournaments attended this year included Middle Tennessee State. LSU. Emory. Samtord 
University. Louisiana Tech. and the Citadel. Significant among the awards received this year 
are quarter-finals at the Citadel (losing to nationally ranked West Georgia), third at Samford 
(defeating Ohio State, but then losing again to that same West Georgia team): and first at Louisiana 
Tech. Analysis and organization are stressed in the speaking, with tournament competition provid- 
ing the forum to perfect these skills 



Besides travel and competition. Glendy Burke also sponsors the Mardi Gras National Invitational 
Debate Tournament, with more than 50 teams from all over the country participating in the four-day 
session. This year's winner was Oklahoma City University, with Loyola of Chicago finishing second. 

With the teams of Hickok & Pinnolis, and Shea & Buras returning, Glendy hopes to expand 
its success by developing a program for all those interested in intercollegiate debate An important 
step in this development would be a return of the Glendy Burke Debate Scholarship now being 
withheld by the Admissions Office. Obviously, more than the promise of a 'good education" 
is needed to attract top high school debate talent. Tulane debate looks to a stronger future next 
year with a core of experienced debators plus new members drawn by the hope for debate 
scholarships. 



Debate 





Soccer 








- '^-... '• ^g''-'*-''y^''-.-^t.''.;.^*^ i''-'p"'!---'-- 




Since its establishment in 1962, the 
Tulane Soccer Team has posted nine 
consecutive winning seasons. It has 
progressed from a small club playing 
exhibition-type, promotional games, to 
a team of over 30 members competing 
in full-scale collegiate competition. 

Five times in the last six years, Tulane 
has carried off the championship 
trophy for the Gulf Coast Soccer 
League. The last four years have pro- 
duced a cumulative record of 42 wins, 
nine losses, and seven ties. 

After a rather slow start which pro- 
duced frustrating ties in three of the 
first five matches, the fortunes of the 
team progressed steadily until its rec- 
ord was 1 1 wins, two losses, and three 
ties. Both losses came at the hands (or 
feet, rather) of non-collegiate oppo- 
nents. 

Although the Soccer Team enjoys its 
identity as an athletic club, its lack of 
funds forces the members to pay for 
equipment and traveling expenses from 
their own pockets. In addition, the club 
must often scrounge or wait for a field, 
rating a mere third place behind both 
intramural and fraternity endeavors. In 
spite of these usual problems, however, 
the team does promise another suc- 
cessul season next year. 

—Fred King 



PAGE 74 / Club Sports 




front: 

PAUL MATLIN 
MARK ROGERS 
TONY BONO 
MUHAMMED BIZANTI 
JIMMY STONE 
VICTOR LUNYONG 
CARLOS BAUMANN 
AGELI ELMERI 
IVAN DIAZ 
MARK FELL 
FRED KING. COACH 

back: 

DON SOMMERS 
TIM HUMMEL 
REINALDO CASTILLO 
STEVE KORBECKI 



ROBERTO OWEN 
REINER ERNST 
SEAN GALVIN 
RICK HEBLER 
BOB ABRAHSON 
RICHARD HARRIS 
STEVE TROXLER 
JIMMY SAN MARTIN 
FELIPE WOHL 

COULDN'T MAKE (T 

VINCENTE CALABRESE 

PAUL SILLS 

ROB BURRILL 

ALI RIAHI 

INGO FORTH 

DENIS DIEGO 








~ ... -KNEElWG)-"--.;- ■■ - "■'■ 

.. -JyllKE KEYES , • ; 
dHARLIE--MONNpT. 



f'RiTKf-'EtLl'S- .-'.' 
■/DENIflSWUICH" 

■BOB EDMUNDS ON 

-GEpR 



y^i^3■EAN^REZ - ■^;.. --i'.;;' , "- 
' CHA_B^LES"-SE-_Sfr.CROI-X" 
:-aOB W-A-GMA'rT~- ■ 
-•■BRIAN .TRA-viSr . : -; ■- 
V 'AM'Ofp.DaPISANI-'^ ;. 



J.OiJNMERRILl?--^- 
'MIKE MARRITi: "• Vi'-i 



■' - '■-:^a©HN:"'HOV^ELli. ^i^J-ii--^' '., 
. ' ■■|;'E^■■LAtl):^E■R"■^/;'Jt7;i.-,$~^:^■- 
lB bDMUNUi;0_N ■■ •.--- , 'Htti.N.uLu.uuKi&Ai\ir '__■-._■:"'-- ^H^^:^S'^Qj^,':':>''t^-'.;^^,-^-- 
PRGE'STELLINSS<-" .:---:;^.>:^ -STAN SMITH V. "^ _?^^.;■■,.- ■•-"i.-^-'".aWP?'BiJGHE^;-^^j-v>,,> .. 



a 




The Tulane Rugby Team brought its season to a 
close with a successful record of 12 wins and four 
losses. Tulane's team was well-seasoned with veterans 
this year. With the anchors of a strong scrum, averag- 
ing six feet and 200 pounds each, the scrum utilized 
effective ball control, allowing the backs to exhibit 
strong running, speed, and depth. On the whole, Tu- 
lane fielded one of its best balanced teams ever, as 
evidenced by its winning record. 

Significant victories included an 11-3 win over 
archrival LSU. a gruelling 6-0 victory over the inventors 
of the game, the British from the H.M.S. Jupiter, and 
finally taking a second place in the highly competitive 
Mardi Gras Tournament, over such teams as Houston. 
Waterloo (Canada), University of Toronto, Clemson, 
Memphis, and the University of Wisconsin. With its 
impressive record, Tulane finds itself in the top 20 
teams in the nation. 

The rugby team has a bleak future unless it can 
recruit a significant number of undergraduates to fill 
the ranks of the 20 or so veterans leaving in the next 
two years. With the concerted effort of a recruiting 
program next September, hopefully Tulane will be able 
to field two teams where everyone who joins will play. 
With better organization next year, and an extensive 
publicity campaign, the merits of next year's team will 
be spread on campus and throughout the city. 

— Rudick Murphy 
A&S 74 



Rugby 




/ PACE 77 




Pan-hel 



Basketball— Zeta Beta Tau; Bowling— Zeia Beta Tau; 
Touch Football—Sigma Alpha Epsilon; Go/f— Sigma 
Nu; Handball— Kappa Sigma; Softball— Zeta Beta 
Tau; Trac/c— Sigma Nu; Siv/mm/ng— Sigma Alpha 
Epsilon; l/o//eyba//— Alpha Sigma Phi 



' 



Intramurals 

CAMPUS & DORM LEAGUE CHAMPIONS: 

Badminton-Jay Schiller (A & S), Gary Rosmarin 

(Phelps); Basketball Free Throws— Kenny Davis 

(Navy R.O.T.C), Will Rodriguez (Irby); 

Basketball-LasN School, Irby; Bowling— ACT, Irby; 

CA7ess-Michael Ballotti (A & S), Eric Jones 

(Derickson); Cross Counfry-Bill McCray (Air Force 

R.O.T.C), Mike Willoughby (Phelps); Duplicate 

Br/dge-Anthony Ng and Alvin Aubry (Med School), 

Arnie Ricker and Ron Beelman (Creighton); Field 

Goal Kicking— Ken Ducote (New/man), David 

Hollander (Phelps); Touch Football-Navy R.O.T.C, 

Phelps; Go/f-Charles Rosen (Navy R.K.T.C), Gary 

Saginor (Irby); Hanc/da//-Robert Thompson (A & S), 

Tom Assad (Irby); Poo/— Hugh Manson 

(Engineering), Gary Saginor, (Irby); 

Soccer-Engineering, McBryde; Soffda//-Navy 

R.O.T.C, Irby; Squash— Russ Mericle (Business 

School); Dan Nash (Ayres); Siv/mm/ng-Medical 

School, Irby; Table Tennis-Jetf Wiener (A & S), 

Bob Griffin (Derickson); Tenn/s-Steve Foldes (Law^ 

School), Gary Rosmarin (Phelps); 7ug-0-l/Var-Navy 

R.O.T.C, Phelps; Vo//eyba//— Newman Club, Irby. 



PAGE 78 / Club Sports 







/ PACE 79 



- 1 





Rugby 



t»-' 



Sailing 



WOMEN'S NATIONAL INTERCOLLEGIATE 
SAILING CHAMPIONSHIP 

ANNAPOLIS, MD. 
BALDWIN WOOD 

NEW ORLEANS, LA. Isl 

DOUGLAS CUP 

LONG BEACH, CAL. 1s1 

NEW YORK INTERSECTIONAL, 
NEVINS TROPHY 

GREAT NECK. N.Y. 1111 

TEXAS A. & M. INVITATIONAL 

HOUSTON, TEX. Isl 

S.E.I.S.A. KEELBOAT CHAMPIONSHIP 

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 7tl 

SUGAR BOWL 

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 2n( 

WINDJAMMER 

NEW ORLEANS. LA. 1sl 

ST. PETERSBURG INVITATIONAL 

ST. PETERSBURG, FLA. 2n( 

KENNEDY CUP 

ANNAPOLIS. MD. Isl 

WESTERN ELIMINATIONS, 
S.E.I.S.A. DINGHY CHAMPIONSHIPS 

FORT WORTH. TEX. Isl 

S.E.I.S.A. DINGHY CHAMPIONSHIP 
k NEW ORLEANS. LA. 1s1 



T.U. 


OPPONENT 




6 


PENSACOLA 


3 


8 


SPRING HILL 





13 


SPRING HILL 


8 


6 


H.M.S. JUPITER 





6 


HAMMOND R.F.C. 


5 


3 


L.S.U. 


15 


6 


HAMMOND R.F.C. 








SPRING HILL 


13 


11 


L.S.U. 


3 


9 


SPRING HILL 





5 


HAMMOND R.F.C. 


6 


14 


LOYOLA 


3 


19 


LOYOLA 


3 


2ND 


MARDI GRAS TOURNAMENT 




27 


CLEMSON 





21 


MEMPHIS 


6 


11 


PALMER 


40 



Soccer 



T.U. 


OPPONENT 


1 


RICE 


2 


L.S.U. 


1 


LOYOLA 


1 


U. SOU. MISS. 


3 


L.S.U. 


4 


L.S.U.N.O. 


2 


«H.M.S. JUPITER 


3 


«OLYMPIA SOCCER CLUB 


7 


DELGADO 


3 


L.S.U.N.O. 


1 


'PENSACOLA N.A.S. 


3 


DELGADO 


4 


L.S.U.N.O. 


3 


DELGADO 


5 


L.S.U.N.O. 


6 


DELGADO 




("Non-league Exhibition matches] 



student Senate 

A major concern of the 1 970-71 Student Senate has 
been that of communications within the University 
community. At the level of communication among 
the students themselves, the Senate's primary 
weapon was the "Yellow Lorries," a one-page publi- 
cation of the Student Senate Office distributed sev- 
eral times monthly. Besides giving notice of the 
various Student Senate activities, the "Yellow Lor- 
ries" contained items of community and national 
concern which were felt to be of interest to the 
students. Another approach to this student-to- 
student contact was the development of working 
relationships between the Student Senate and the 
student governments of the 11 colleges of the Uni- 
versity, especially with those such as University Col- 
lege which, prior to this year, had had no organized 
student government. 

At the level of communication between the stu- 
dents and the other groups of the University, the 
Student Senate initiated the "University Forum" 
series and strove for greater student participation 
in the University governance process. The forums, 
held once each week, allowed the students to air 
their gripes about chronic University problems and 
to discuss them with various members of the faculty 
and the administration; topics such as University 
Food Services, housing, the Health Service, the drug 
situation nn campus, and the University's financial 
crisis were typical. 

Students, this year, also found themselves with 
a greater voice in University governance. For the 
first time, students, through three non-voting repre- 
sentatives, were given direct access to the Board 
of Administrators. Students served as voting 
members of 13 University Senate committees, and 
four students, elected from the Student Senate, 
served as voting members of the University Senate. 
Through such representation, the Student Senate 
was able to communicate its views on all matters 
of concern to the University and especially those 
having to do with student life. The five student rep- 
resentatives on the University Senate Committee on 
Student Affairs were able to hammer out agreements 
concerning the student Senate's and Student Wel- 
fare Committee's recommendations concerning the 
co-residence dorm and the 24-hour visitation pro- 
posals; the Student Senate in conjunction with the 
Student Affairs Committee also helped draft a new 
Student Conduct Code. The Student Senate's traffic 
and parking proposals, aimed at discouraging un- 
necessary parking on campus, were dealt with fa- 
vorably by the University Senate Committee on Traf- 
fic and Security. As a result of action taken by a 
student representative on the Committee on Aca- 
demic Ceremonies, President Longenecker has 
agreed to consult with various student body leaders 
in the selection of future commencement speakers. 
A last effort made by the Student Senate in attempt- 
ing to deal with the problem of communications 
between students and the administration was the 
sponsoring of arrangements whereby various 
members of the Board of Administrators had break- 
fast with students at C.R. and Bruff before their May 
6th meeting. 



What else has the Student Senate done this year? 

1) brought the campus a 5C; Xerox machine, 

2) sponsored Clothing and Blood Drives, 

3) made its views known (to "Big John", the N.O. 
City Council, etc.) about the proposed Missis- 
sippi River Bridge, 

k 4) donated $50. to the Kent State Legal Aid De- 
fense Fund, 

5) sponsored (in conjunction with LSUNO) an Ed- 
ucational Reform Conference, 

6) sponsored a student body referendum on the 
Peoples' Peace Treaty, 

7) donated $60. to help the campaign for passage 
of the city bond issue for the construction of 
a new Parish Prison, 

8) sponsored on May 5th a Memorial Service on 
the quad in memory of those killed in Vietnam, 
at Kent State, and at Jackson State, 

9) provided free food for several thousand Mardi 
Gras guests, provided sleeping space on the 
quad and under the stadium, provided student 
marshals to assist the extremely cooperative 
Security Force, provided daily Mardi Gras infor- 
mation bulletins, and kept the Student Senate 
Office open and operative 24 hours a day during 
the Carnival period, and 

10) sent Spiro T. Agnew a thesaurus. 

—Jane Zimmerman 




PAGE 82 / Club Sports 




OFFICERS: 

President: 

Ralph Wafer 

V.-P Administration: 

Leon Trice 

V.-P. Finance: 

Ken Levine 

Secretary: 

Jane Zimmerman 

U. C Board President: 

Sonny Wiegand 

C-A.C.T.U.S. Chairman: 

John Carey 

SENATORS; 
Architecture: 
Alvin Cox 
George Miller 
A & S: 
Brian Bash 
Bruce Berger 
Jerry Clark 
Bruce Feingerts 
Mike Florie 
Rony Fontana 
Chuck Leaness 
George Nelson 
Steve Schuster 
Hugh Taylor 
Gary Weiss 



Engineering: 
Lea Crump 
Jim Koontz 
Jack Laborde 
Dave O'Brien 
Graduate Business: 
Chuck Gazanek 
Jim Hansen 
Graduate Medicine: 
Geoff Land 
Diane Mordaunt 
Ken Olander 
Graduate School: 
Bob Albergotti 
James Edson 
Bonnie Keller 
Brian Moran 
Bob Raich 
Law: 

Glenn Bradford 
Dan Del Priore 
John Landrem 
Medicine: 
Scott Kellermann 
Bill LaCorte 
J, T. McOuitty 
Jack Roniger 
Newcomb: 
Barbara Dickson 
Daniele Dutry 



Jill Ehrenburg 

Susan Fife 

Barbara Hall 

Cathy Nelson 

Carole Swaney 

Marion Shostrom 

Public Health & Trap. Medicine: 

Dr. John Harreil 

Roseann Losklll 

Social Work: 

Sue Kingston 

Karen Lewis 

University College: 

Richard Berry 

Frank Jones 

Dale Ladnier 

Norman Pendergrass 

Eve Valentine 

Yvonne Vonderhaar 

Steve Welsh 

COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN: 
Academic Affairs— John Barnett 
Alumni Relations— Sonny Wiegand 
Awards— Jim Lee 
£/ecf/ons— Dan Del Priore 
Publicity— David Bauman 
Special Projects— M\ke Weinstock 
Student IVe/fere— Chuck Leaness 



/ PAGE 83 



iHlB Wb 




Brotherhood throughout the fraternity 

system has taken on added meaning 

as each fraternity has closely 

scrutinized and re-evaluated its 

ideology. As a result, the social base 

upon which every fraternity was 

founded has been broadened to 

embody the academic, political, and 

cultural dimensions which are so 

important to our time. Fraternity is no 

longer a social entity, but a vital 

complement to university life. 

In an age of war and social unrest, 

fraternities afford students a home 

away from home: a sounding board 

upon which opinions can be shared, 

and convictions confirmed. The 

individual, his needs, his likes, and 

his dislikes have become the focal 

points of fraternity policy. For this 

reason, the microsocial environment 

that fraternity offers has been 

instrumental in establishing a 

meaningful direction for its members 

whose bewilderment and frustration 

has resulted in apathy. Fraternity is 

remarkably sensitive to change, a 

change that each individual member 

can effect. 

Recognizing the need for individual 

autonomy on the fraternity level, the 

Interfraternity Council has abandoned 

its role as a governing body, and has 

established itself as a service 

organization. We believe that the 

laissez-faire atmosphere under which 

the fraternities now function is vital 

to their relevance as a social 

brotherhood. ^ 

— Gregory Bertucci 

Chairman, Tuiane I.F.C. 



SEATED: 

PAT HERRINGTON 'SIGMA NU 

BENNY EICHHOLZ/ZETA BETA TAU 

DR. K. RIESS, ADVISOR 

JEFF KINSELL SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 

STEVE WEBB 'SIGMA PI 

DAN MAUTHE/SIGMA PI 

STEWART KEPPER/SIGMA CHI 

SID MARLOWE/SIGMA NU 

GREG BERTUCCI SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 

ALAN STEWART'DELTA KAPPA EPSILON 

ALAN LAX/PHI KAPPA EPSILON 

JOHN BRADLEY/PHI KAPPA EPSILON 

CHUCK BRENT BETA THETA PI 

BOB GREENSTEIN'TAU EPSILON PHI 

JIM WITHERSPOON/KAPPA SIGMA 

BEN BIALICK/ALPHA TAU OMEGA 



STANDING: 

GEORGE MCGOWIN/ALPHA SIGMA PHI 
MIKE CLADWELL/KAPPA SIGMA 
CHUCK MAGILL/ALPHA TAU OMEGA 

IN absentia: 

JEFF ARMITAGE/SIGMA CHI 
JOHN BAEHR/DELTA TAU DELTA 
BRUCE BERMAN/SIGMA ALPHA MU 
BOB IRUINE/DELTA TAU DELTA 
SANDY WEBB/PI KAPPA ALPHA 
BILL WEBSTER/KAPPA ALPHA 



JEI 






Newcomb Panhellenic 




FRONT: 

JEAN BEUTNER ALPHA DELTA PI 

BONNIE MOULTON PHI MU 

NANCY SWIREN SIGMA DELTA TAU 

MARCIA BENNETT PI BETA PHI 

KAREN MEADER PHI MU 

RONA SIMMONS PHI MU 

back: 

CARMEN CRAMER PI BETA PHI 

JOAN CLONINGER KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA 

FRANCES PAPPAS ALPHA OMICRON PI 

ANDI SERVOS SIGMA DELTA TAU 

PATTY HAUSER KAPPA ALPHA TAU 

BETSY KEYES ALPHA OMICRON PI 

MIMI SCHAUB ALPHA OMICRON PI 

DALE DANE CHI OMEGA 

CATHY BOUDREAUX ALPHA DELTA PI 

PATSY FRIEDLER ALPHA EPSILON PHI 

PAT PRINS ALPHA EPSILON PHI 

KAREN CONLEY PI BETA PHI 

ANDREA RICARDS CHI OMEGA 

JENNY JACKSON KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA 

BETH CHILDRESS KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA 

KAREN LAUTZ KAPPA ALPHA TAU 



Individualism is the emphasis— saying 

what you want to say, doing what's 

right for you. being 

yourself— conformity being ostracized 

and rejected. Verbal expression and 

action are expected of todays 

students. Each issue demands a 

stand; the war. ecology, abortion. 

drug control. The perpetual question 

is "what do you think?" 

This continuous bombardment and 

exposure to new ideas necessarily 

precipitates a striving toward 

self-knowledge and understanding. 

achieved most readily through 

casual, impromtu discussions. The 

sorority house affords the friendly 

atmosphere needed for discovering 

and developing oneself. Expressing 

how and what you feel without great 

apprehension, having a feeling of 

belonging and a warmth away from 

home, and of primary significance. 

the absense of apathy, only 

accomplished by individuals working 

together 

Newcomb Panhellenic Council exists 

only to coordinate sorority activities 

through cooperation Restrictions on 

behavior and ideas are not the 

purpose of the Panhellenic, 

Panhellenic's aim is the development 

of interpersonal relationships. As 

long as individuals seek friendships. 

sororities will survive. 



-Frances Pappas 

Vice-President. 

Newcomb 

Panhellenic 



I 






-- -ii..- ".:,^.'fct"=^ ■-" ■ 






-'«»>'" 






tSi»."^-^i 



:"^^^g^^i^^ m^:'-:b 



JAMBALAYA 1971 

EDITOR 
MATT ANDERSON 

PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLICES 

FRANCISCO ALECHA, WYHE DAWSON, 

PATRICIA HOPKINS, CAYLE LETULLE, 

AND SHEILA SILVER 

CONTRIBUTORS 

DANA ABBOTT. WAYNE ANDERSON, GREG BERTUCCI. 
RILL BROWN, FLOYD BURAS, BRUCE DANNER, JILL 
DUNCAN. TONY FONTANA. JIM HARVEY, KATHY KEIM, 
FRED KING. TONY LANASA, GAYLE LETULLE, RUDICK 
MURPHY. FRANCES PAPPAS, KEN WEIL, SYLVIA YOUNG, 
AND JANE ZIMMERMAN. 



PHOTOGRAPHY 

MATT ANDERSON/' cover, S, 6-9, 12-13, 16-19, 24, 26- 
27. 28-29 (top & bottom), 30 (top), 31-33, (top, 
niicl-riglil), & color), 35 (color, & bottom left), 36 
(top). 38-41, 43-53, 55 (bottom), 56-57, 61, 66, 68- 
73, 74 (right), 75-78, 82-85. BUDDY brimberg/ 67. 
FARRKLL iiockmeier/ 2, 54, 55 (top), 58-59, 60, 
62-63, 64-65, 79, 80-81, 86-7. JOHN JAMES/ 10-11, 
14-15, 20-21. 28 (middle), 30 (color), 34 (mid- 
Icfl), 35 (middle. & bottom right), 36 (color), 37. 
STAN I.ONCF.NECKER/ 29 (color). DR. WINSTON 

RiEHL/ 22-23. MIKE SMITH/ 25, 74 (left), 88. 



nS71 



TULANE 



IME\A/ 



VOLUME 



JAMBALAVA 



UNIVERSITY 



LOUISIANA 



BOOK 4 



'One must not tie a ship to a single anchor, 
nor life to a single hope- 
tor no human condition is ever permanent, 
so do not be overjoyed in good fortune, 
nor too sorrowful in misfortune." 

—Ronald S. Bertucci 



t. 



H 



I 




Ronald S. Bertucci, Arts and Sciences 71 

Dr. Ann Fischer. Newcomb 

Stephen Huffman, Engineering 71 

Dean John W. Lawrence. Architecture 

Roberta Stuart, Newcomb 74 

Dr. David Topping, Arts and Sciences 



-■i^ 






fi / TnCOTTFTTT LOW— WHERE>TR HE MAY BE 
14/ THE TULANIANS— OH, HAPPY DAY! 
ir? BEAUREGARD SQUARE 

18 / SOMETHING "TO NIBBLE ON"— DIRECTION '71 
32 / JOHN W. LAWRENCE: THE MAN AND HIS REGION 
36 HONORARIES 

40 ARTICHOKES. MAGNOLIAS, AND THE NEW SENSIBLES 
44 / THOSE WHO HAVE MADE IT, 1971 
58 / PARANOIA 

60 / THE GUMBO— "A DEAD NUDE ISN'T SO BAD .. ." 
62 / BUT WHO WAS PAULINE TUUANT:? 



RoecRT c. Low. M. D. 



Frank M. Phillippi. M. D. E. O. Schahnitiky, M. D. 

Robert L. Haves, M. D. 



E. L. •niANDKl.L. M. D 






The brewtdn Medical Center 

McMruLAN Ave. 
BREWTON, ALABAMA 



Randolph M. McDowell 
business manager 

May 28, 1970 




p' 



Dr. Herbert E. Longnecker 

President ^^ 

Tulane University of Louisiana 

Tulane University Station 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70118 y. 

Dear Dr. Longnecker: 

I hate to disturb you with this letter but feel 
that I must speak out about certain activities at Tulane 
University. My first reaction when I viewed the notorious 
picture of Tulane University students burning President 
Nixon in effigy, which was in Time Magazine several weeks ago, 
was one of disbelief. I did not believe that the 
administrators and president of such a great university would 
allow such to go on. Disregarding whether or not President 
Nixon is liked or disliked by the vast majority of students, 
the office of the President of the United States is the 
highest office to be held in this country. The office itself 
demands the respect of the entire nation, and the man who 
holds this office is there because of the mandate of the 
people of this country. Disrespect to this office is comparable 
to gross disrespect to our flag, and to our nation and what it 
stands for. Unfortunately you are held responsible for the 
actions of the University and for the actions of its students. 
It is hopeful that I have been misinformed about certain other 
things going on at Tulane but until I understand the situation 
better, I am withholding further contributions to this University 
Of course my contributions are small and will not be missed, but 
as an interested alumnus of our University I felt that I had to 
speak out. 



Very truly yours , 



REL:k 
cc : 
cc: 
cc: 
cc : 



Robert E. Low, M.D. 
H., Medicine Class, 1946 

Chairman, Board of Administrators 
Chairman Alumni Fund 
President, Tulane Alumni Assoc. 
Tulane Hullabaloo 



I 




TO ROBERT LOW- 
WHEREVER HE MAY BE 




The letter which appears on the opposite page, when 
I first read it more than a year ago, seemed to contain 
the rather commonly held opinion of a typical alumnus 
who had lost touch with his University. But, as I found 
out recently, the Robert Low of 1971-while maintaining 
his concept of resolute respect for national symbols- 
proved to be a supporter of student ■Tights," an envious 
admirer of those students today who have more courage 
than students had in his 'day' to stand up to faculty 
members and administrators. But more important, Robert 
Low revealed that I was the first person from Tulane to 
respond directly to his letter. True, he had received two 
very impersonal form letters from the University, but in 
the interim, neither helped in any way to placate his 
distress over the events that occurred last spring. 

Who should be blamed for the lack of communication 
with Robert Low, and for that matter, all the Robert Lows 
from the class of 1946, or 1926, or 1966? I would deduce 
that all of us here at Tulane in 1971, as well as all the 
Robert Lows out there, all 40,000 of them, are all partially 
at fault. To the students and the "nine to five-rs" who 
run the University, 1 would suggest that we can or should 
go out of our way to find, question, and correct wherever 
necessary, the misnomers and misconceptions which 
others might have about this University, about the 'stu- 
dent movement' concept, and how it relates to Tulane. 
But more than that, I would hope we would approach 
the Robert Low's with a willingness to seek out and 
understand their philosophies and their concepts. Like- 
wise, the Robert Low's should not let their questions go 
unanswered. If they believe that they are mismformed. 
as this Dr. Low hoped that he was. they should also seek 
out the truth from other sources; to be frustrated by 
silence, as Dr. Low was for over a year, can only breed 
further misgivings. 

On the following pages, we have presented the opinions 
of five writers, two students, two faculty members, and 
one administrator, all of whom have set about to explain 
what has occurred in the past 20 months at this institu- 
tion. Their opinions are not intended to be taken individ- 
ually as the correct interpretation: rather, we would hope 
that the articles would stimulate each reader to formulate 
his own interpretation of what has occurred here. Then 
seek out a Robert Low or two; as an exercise of the 
intellect, it may be a worthwhile endeavor. 

—Matt Anderson 

June, 1971 



-■'-' ^-■^-— '^ >j---*^ >. . ^'.«_: 



/ PAGE 7 



1 




^Ri 






^^^» 










#A«lft / 






.-^ 








-y ■" 






Why were there quite literally only one-tenth 
the number of campus disturbances this year as 
compared to last? Why did Tulane have no dif- 
ficulty this year? What has changed? 

I suppose everyone on this and other cam- 
puses has asked those or similar questions. And 
the answers, if they can be found, will be impor- 
tant, for the only way to make reasonable guesses 
about the future is to have evolved intelligent 
conclusions about the past. 

It would be satisfying to say that the campuses 
are so different because tfie world is so different. 
Yet the horror of Vietnam continues. The Galley 
trial and the current official investigations of 55 
other Americans— including a general— for atro- 
cities must have heightened our awareness of 
the cost of war to the American living as well 
as to the Vietnamese and American dead. Prob- 
lems of race continue. Read Harold Sylvester's 
statement in Book One of this Jamb. Oil spills, 
mercury poisoning, and the death of the eagles 
document the continued defacing and befouling 
of our earth. 

The national issues are still here. And even the 
local issues of substance remain. The Dubinsky 
affair— the most inflammatory issue of a year 
ago— is sufficiently unresolved to have been use- 
ful this spring to anyone who sought to promote 
a confrontation. 

The difference is not in issues. The difference 
is in people. On this campus at least, people are 
dealing with people in a manner markedly dif- 
ferent from the manner of last year. A number 
of people have said that communication is better. 
And it is, but that's not all of the explanation. 
"Good" communication exists when meaning is 
clearly conveyed. The vituperation associated 
with the TLF movement of last spring accurately 
conveyed meaning. It also made rational reso- 
lution of disagreement difficult. 



This year people are hearing other people. To 
hear someone— to really hear him— is to admit to 
him that we are less than certain that we have 
the answer, to tell him that perhaps he can help 
in the resolution of the difficulty, and to involve 
him actively in developing a solution, I like the 
term Robert King Merton used in his com- 
mencement address: "the new sensibles." 
Somehow, the place has become nearly overrun 
with "sensibles" this year. 

Where did the "sensibles" come from? Actu- 
ally, nearly all of us were here last year. We 
changed. Tom Ireland in the first Book of the 
Jamb gives significant credit to the Tulane Sum- 
mer Conference. Doubtless, the Conference was 
one of a number of things that convinced us that 
if we take Tulane seriously, we had better take 
each other seriously. Though the TLF "libera- 
tion" of the University Center last spring may 
have begun in the revolution-should-be-fun spirit 
of Jerry Rubin's Do It. it ended with rumors of 
violent counter-liberation and an awareness that 
revolution can be dangerous. 

In sum, I think a number of events of last spring 
and summer made many of us just flat scared 
for Tulane; and that made us "sensibles." 

One wonders how well we learned our lessons. 
Tacked to one of my bookshelves is an epigram 
inscribed on a large scratch pad by one of the 
Summer Conference participants: "Once upon 
a time there was a fairy princess . . . but she 
didn't last." I kept it for what I think the young 
lady is saying about me and my generation and 
for what I think it says about her. But does it 
say something about Tulane of this year and 
next? 

—Dr. Edward Rogge, 

Director of Admissions 
and Financial Aid 





The kaleidoscopic turmoil that swept 
across college campuses last spring 
was followed this spring by a myste- 
rious calm as the dominant mood at 
Tulane and most universities. A 
combination of outrage at President 
Nixon's announcement of the Cam- 
bodian invasion and the shock of the 
shootings at Kent State and Jackson 
State had sent students into a severe 
wave of gut-reaction violence or 
protest on many campuses in 1970. 
Thousands of students who con- 
verged on Washington in May to 
protest the war threatened to be- 
come one of the most potent political 
froces in the nation. 

But despite great hopes for thrust- 
ing the university, as an institution, 
into the American political process, 
the campuses remained relatively 
quiet in 1971. Tulane tended to fol- 
low this national pattern. The spring 
of 1970 brought the fiery destruction 
of one of the barracks, the takeover 
of the University Center, the anti- 
Cambodian demonstrations, the 
hanging of Nixon in effigy, the flag- 
pole incident. The next fall Tulane 
floundered through its normal winter 
hibernation en route to predicted 
trouble in the spring. The question 
was, what would "it" be this year? 
"It never happened. 

But why were the campuses calm 
this past year despite America's 
continued involvement in Southeast 
Asia and the constant student con- 
cern over our domestic problems? 
Some point to the absence of shock- 
ing events like Kent and Jackson 
State, the decline of attacks on stu- 
dents by Spiro T., the loss of glamor 
of extremism, or even the frustration 
of students with the lack of success 
of protests. The "movement" has 



definitely strayed away from its for- 
merly nihilistic tendencies. 

Each campus has its own individ- 
ual combination of reasons for the 
quiet. Tulane's reasons were proba- 
bly as complex as any, and any 
speculation is almost purely guess. 
Could it have been the successful 
"Year of the Green"? or how about 
the completion of the "Memorial to 
an IBM Punch Card" (better known 
as the new Science Center)? A more 
realistic explanation may be that 
considerable progress was made 
here to increase the voice of stu- 
dents in University governance. 
Placing students on the Board of 
Administrators, the University Sen- 
ate, and vital committees was a move 
in the right direction. 

Still another reason for the calm 
may have been the realization that 
to show hostility toward the uni- 
versity because of policies of the 
national government simply does not 
make sense. The university should 
be a rallying point for constructive 
change rather than a martyr for dis- 
placed aggression. 

Hopefully, next year students will 
continue to avoid violence. But Tu- 
lane students and students all over 
the country should assert them- 
selves to bring about necessary 
change. Students can, collectively 
and individually, apply effective 
pressures for constructive change in 
our society without unnecessary 
disturbances. Let's hope our pleas 
for progress are not ignored be- 
cause of the lack of thunder and 
lightning. 

—Bruce Feingerts 

A & S '72 




One can easily come forth with a 
string of cliches to answer the ques- 
tion, "Why has the campus been so 
quiet this year?" Maybe the cliches 
are right. And maybe the fact that 
the cliches are right is the nub of 
the students' problem in 1971. So- 
ciologists like myself make a busi- 
ness of analyzing the social world, 
an enterprise formerly the domain of 
youth feeling their way into identities 
of themselves and their world. There 
are too many of us sociologists 
around, and we have too many an- 
swers (all of which seem to be at 
least a little bit right). Worst of all, 
most of our answers carry a sort of 
sadness about the plight of being 
human and the dehumanizing con- 
tingencies of having society forced 
upon us. This sort of realism can be 
learned too early; there is an advan- 
tage in stumbling into the facts of 
loneliness and powerlessness rather 
than having them anticipated. Igno- 
rance can be bliss. Be that as it may, 
today's students are exposed to their 
own fallibilities too early and too 
much. 

Despite my own warnings, 1 will try 
to provide my own analysis of this 
question, more from the viewpoint of 
the professor than of the sociologist. 
A first answer is that the Tulane 
campus was quiet because it has 
always been quiet. Maybe the events 
of last year were not really events- 
over and over we hear the statement 
that only a miniscule proportion of 
the student body was involved in the 
"uprisings"; this seems largely cor- 
rect. Furthermore, we can say that 
nothing really happened; the occu- 
pation of the U.C. and the flagpole 
incident may have been non-events 
in terms of their consequences. 
Thus, if nothing happened this year 
or last year or the year before last 
year, what is there to explain? But 
that conclusion really isn't much fun; 
we surely can find something to ex- 
hume and dissect. 

The students of 1970 were re- 
vulsed with their country more than 
they were with Tulane University. 
Tulane happened to be a handy rep- 
resentative of American society, and 
consequently provided a stage for an 
attempted happening. Tulane was 
and is representative of the larger 
society in many respects: elitism, 
rising "taxation" with few visible 
benefits, credibility gaps, and an iso- 
lation of the business of governance 
from the "people." These are all de- 
scriptive of Tulane to a certain de- 
gree, but are equally descriptive of 
oiher American universities. The 
acted-out revulsion seemed to have 
some effects locally. The weekly 
forums with administrators seem to 



be a usefully symbolic result; likewise 
the Mushroom has been a most val- 
uable addition to the University, al- 
though there may be some question 
as to whether it might have been 
established "anyway." But these 
"concessions," if they can rightfully 
be called such, are really not much. 
But neither were the demands. 

Maybe the 1971 student body was 
"cooled out" by these concessions. 
But this seems too simple and too 
wrong. These were not the changes 
that were desired. What was wanted 
was an end to the powerlessness of 
the people in American society. But 
the past year has seen this power- 
lessness grow in new and unex- 
pected ways. In my mind, the action 
of the grand jury in Ohio in response 
to the Kent State tragedy provided 
a clear and final answer to the ques- 
tion of the worth of protesting. Thus 
the quietude. 

Another facet in explaining this 
year's "peace" is the decline in 
health of Mother Tulane. Not only 
threatened with repudiation and 
permanent insult from the AAUP, she 
has also been reduced to an almost 
bare cupboard and a tattered frock 
in terms of the financial future. It just 
seems unfair to beat on the old girl 
when she's really down. In my expe- 
rience I have never seen a student 
body or faculty that was so self- 
flagellating about the quality of its 
university as the Tulane community. 
This has been greatly tempered this 
year; those who can't leave her may 
not love her, but at least have put 
up with her to a greater degree than 
before. This change in attitude per- 
haps reflects the national insecurity 
of universities in general; the events 
of 1 970 clearly informed the powerful 
that the universities were one citadel 
of the enemy. Consequently we are 
being starved into shaping up. 

Finally, I must put forth my own 
eccentric view that students have 
turned away from protest and revo- 



lution because of the way most of 
them were brought up. The pseu- 
do-psychiatric strategies advocated 
by Dr. Spock ef al. have obliterated 
that ancient and blessed potential of 
humankind which I would call ego 
strength or ego integrity. We all went 
through various forms of protest and 
self-defense when we were kids, but 
sooner or later we "came around" 
to the "correct" discovery that what 
really wrong was us. This is the con- 
sequence of the "threat of withdra- 
wal of love" childrearing strategy 
employed by the enlightened middle 
class for the past 25 years or so. 
Thus to replace the protest groups 
we have encounter groups. Here the 
individual can find the real source 
of his troubles and complaints: him- 
self. The University Health Service's 
psychiatric service boomed this year 
as it never did before; the flow of 
prescription psychiatric drugs ap- 
peared almost to equal the fun-drug 
traffic. This is where the myth of the 
counter-culture is really stripped 
bare: this generation has been 
taught to "adjust" at any cost; the 
fear of rejection runs so high that 
friendship will be purchased from a 
psychiatrist or In an encounter group 
as the first resort rather than the last 
resort. Despite words to the contrary, 
we don't trust the reality of worth of 
our own being; we seek to change 
ourselves instead of changing the 
social structure, insuring an ever- 
flowing supply of love and accep- 
tance. With this value so deeply en- 
grained in the youth generation, with 
drugs seen as the only route to a 
better reality (more explicit than the 
elders' climbing into their martinis), 
the status quo has little to fear now 
or in the future. 

This is a terrifying prognosis and 
explanation for the quiet campus. I 
hope it's wrong. 



Dr. Paul Roman 

Sociology, 
Newcomb 





TTwmms 

Jelll-ni^i 

jf IH ir 11 

in III nil 11 




The class of 71 lived through probably the most exciting, 
exhausting, exhilarating, and anguished four years in 
Tulane's history. Conflict between the students and the 
faculty, between the students and the administration, 
between the students and the community reached a high 
point in the spring of 1970. Nearly everyone expected 
the troubles to continue to accelerate into the fall of 1970, 
but quite the opposite happened. The academic year 
1 970-71 has been as peaceful as any even in the suddenly 
fashionable 1950's. I have been asked to speculate why 
this peace fell. Naturally, no one can be sure, but listed 
below are my best guesses. Since the same thing hap- 
pened all over the country, the emphasis will not be on 
persons and issues unique to Tulane. 

(1) The recession. Revolutionaries need money and 
leisure, strange as it may seem. Students began to worry 
about getting a job when they graduated— the seller's 
market of the 1960's disappeared and there was even 
some indication that parents would be less generous. 
There was a shift in atmosphere from expansiveness and 
high rhetoric to more direct and immediate matters. Rev- 
olutions come out of depressions, sometimes, and more 
often, out of rapid expansions; but never out of reces- 
sions. 

(2) Faculty and administrative resistance. Punishment 
began to be meted out to disruptive faculty and students. 
Just as the recession saw the end of the decade-long 
expansion of student economic power, so the sanctions 
saw the end of the equally long expansion of student 
freedom of behavior. Personal behavior will probably 
continue to be largely unrestricted, but direct political 
action will be limited. 

(3) 7/76 loss of glamor of violence and direct action. 
There was both a fascination with and aversion to vio- 
lence during the late Sixties. Deaths at Kent State and 
the University of Wisconsin tipped the balance against 
violence. Many of the leftist leaders also lost the charisma 
and moral influence that they previously had. 

(4) Tfie cfiance of a student having to fight in the 
Vietnam War and the uncertainty as to whether he would 
be called were decreased. The war declined in scope 
and severity and the lottery draft system took away a 
large degree of uncertainty as to whom would be called. 

(5) The race question became less involved in campus 
politics. White students became disillusioned with Black 
students. Black students became disillusioned with White 
students. The inward turning of Black students lessened 
all types of contact, including confrontation. 

(6) Students gained more control over their personal 
life. Many restrictions unrelated to students' academic 
behavior were relaxed. This increased freedom eliminated 
a variety of strongly felt grievances and also diverted 
students from political issues. 

(7) Students gained a larger voice in university govern- 
ment. This is not only last, it is also very much least. 
Students actually have very little more influence over the 
running of the university in 1971 than in 1961. Although 
"Student Power" was much talked about, students never 
had much interest in running the university. 

—Dr. Robert S. Robins 

Political Science, 
A & S 



PAGE 12 / 




From anathema. 
Ill 



to dialogue 



to consciousness 



This past spring most colleges and universities experi- 
enced an unexpected calm on their campuses; the recur- 
ring question, "Why was the campus quiet this year?", 
haunted everyone from parents to the university pres- 
idents, themselves. Tulane, not to be an exception by 
any means, was equally free from the demonstrations, 
marches and speech rallys which were so commonplace 
in the spring of last year. This is not to say that the 
students at Tulane had forgotten about the war in South- 
east Asia, the Cambodian invasion or the atrocities at 
both Kent and Jackson State. For reasons which I will 
attempt to explain, the student interest and energies, 
nationally as well as at Tulane, took a new and unan- 
ticipated direction this past year. 

On the national scene the politically committed leaders 
were tactically and helplessly at ends. After everything 
had failed, they could not think of much else to do. The 
two alternatives open for them were, either to commit 
themselves to long term projects (which, practically 
speaking, did not look very bright) or they could just give 
up. It is easy to see how the end result could be nothing 
but frustration. When the politically involved student fol- 
lowers are faced with frustration and are not committed 
to full time action, they get bored very easily. Their only 
alternative is to get back into themselves, to withdraw 
from the political arena, and to return to their private 
lives for reconciliation. The students involved in the 
spring-wars of 1970 were just plain tired; tired of violence 
and tired of repeating their unaswered call for a new way 
of life. 

On the local scene at Tulane, there were some very 
definite reasons for the radical change in campus climate. 
The first, and probably the best, explanation for the 
change in mood was the absence of Tulane's radical 
leaders. For various reasons, about which there is some 
speculation, these leaders of last spring were not to be 
found at fall registration. The second and most visible 
reason for the turn about this year was the efforts made 
by those students still concerned in bringing about mean- 
ingful change, and by those few administrators sincerely 
involved in bringing about increased and better com- 
munications within the Tulane community. Their con- 
certed attempt could be seen in the weekly university 
forums, set up by Student Body President and ex-campus 
radical, Ralph Wafer, to increase the dialogue between 
the administration and the students. This effort in better- 
ing communications was further aided by the increased 
student representation on the Board of Administrators. 
Finally, to get more student participation in the bodies 
directly affecting the life of the student, the University 
Center Governing Council was created with a student 
elected as chairman. 

It is important to point out that, if newly created efforts 
to increase communication within the university commu- 
nity are to work, the students must vigorously and actively 
confront the administration with any and all changes 
necessary for the improvement of their educational insti- 



tution. As past events at Tulane, especially those most 
recent, the spring of 70, have clearly indicated, if Tulane 
is to move ahead as a viable and changing institution 
of higher learning, the students will have to take a more 
active and instrumental role. 

Finally, a word must be mentioned here for what I think 
is the new student activism going on behind the scenes 
at Tulane. Because of our changing youth culture, and 
because of the genuine frustration with national issues 
and priorities, many students are putting their efforts to 
work on a more personal level. Smaller groups are form- 
ing on campus with more emphasis being placed on 
personal growth and inter-personal relationships. This is 
evident in the increased participation in encounter, and 
so, called sensitivity groups. Students are looking inwards 
for many of the answers which they could not find in 
mass demonstrations. This renewed inner life, which 
Charles Reich calls "Consciousness III," will be what is 
needed for a new and better community and world. 

—Lee Trice 

Architecture '72 




/ PAGE 13 





the tulanians 
oh, happy day! 



The Spring calendar at Tulane usually allows for a 
campus riot, a deluge of rain, and the Tulanians' Spring 
Show; this year (as mentioned in the previous articles), 
no one showed up for the riot, and it failed to rain. 
The Tulanians' however, attracted over 2700 people 
to Dixon Hall over a three night stretch. 

The Tulanians' popularity can be attributed to the 
wider range in music the group now sings. Eleven years 
ago when the organization was formed, light pop was 
the only music sung. Much of the credit for this change 
toward a wider variety in music and for the new ar- 
rangements from original popular songs is due to the 



PAGE 14 / 




J J 




ANOS: Irene 
ell, Betsy Keys, 
e Klllebrew, Debra 
;iein, Gussie Morris, 
and Mary RIckard. 
ALTOS: Marldel Allen. 
Jenny Jackson. Katy 
Kostka. Janey Lazarow, 
Nancy Seaver, Terry 
Terrlll. TENORS: Andy 
Allen, Keith Hooks. 
Roger Longtx>tham. 
and Jim Merrell. 
BARITONES: Rick 
Drake. Jim Farr. and 
Jimmy Sheats. 
BASSES: David 
Bauman, and Mark 
Wagner. PIANO: Stella 
Jones. DRUMS: Rick 
Mackie. GUITAR: 
Randy Seybold, and 
Mike Vargon. STRING 
BASS: John Gray. 



group's director, Leiand Bennett. Many have seen him 
and his group seemingly mouthing words as they prac- 
tice in the fish-bowl (the large listening room in the 
University Center). Their work is not, however, unre- 
warded—over an eight week period from March to May, 
they performed at alumnae educational conferences 
in Jackson and Biloxi, Mississippi, a three night stand 
in Der Rathskeller, the Spring Show, and the Bob Hope 
Show in Municipal Auditorium. 

To refresh one's memory as to the type of music 
which the Tulanians have "popularized" with their own 
following, here are some of the songs which high- 



lighted this year's spring performances; Sad Lisa (Cat 
Stevens), Close to You and We've Only Just Begun 
(the Carpenters), My Sweet Lord (George Harrison). 
Save the Country (Laura Nyro), Requiem for the 
Masses (the Association), Sunday Will Never Be the 
Same (Spanky and Our Gang). Midnight Cowboy, Ev- 
erybody's Talkin'. Jesus Christ Superstar, and Oh 
Happy Day. 

—Diane Burnside 

Newcomb 71 



/ PAGE 15 








PAGE 16 / 





PAGE 18 / 



"... and because I believe brevity is the soul of wit, I only want 
to make a couple of random comments. First, the Direction program 
has become and will continue to be a timely and a sought-after forum 
for some of America's most distinguished individuals. I think that we 
all can be very proud of that fact. Second, the emphasis this year 
in Direction has been an attempt to increase the interaction between 
the speakers, the students, and the faculty. To do this we have created 
the Direction "Living Room," which will be located on the second 
floor of the University Center and which we sometimes know as the 
Kendall Cram Room. And here I invite you, in fact I encourage you 
to go over, to take your shoes off. to sit down— we have carpets over 
there, there are a few things to nibble on ... to eat .. . sandwiches 
. . . and I encourage you to— establish ... a relationship with some 
of the speakers who have come— brevity sure is the soul of wit and 
I'd better stop— a long way not to talk at you but to communicate 
with you . . ." '. 



—Clark Durant, Chairman, Direction '71 



Wednesday, april 21st 




PAGE 20 / 



William f. 
buckley, jr. 



"What is it tiiat inappens when the gov- 
ernment undertaites to do something? 
They are saying now in Europe 'You 
itnow what would happen if the Com- 
munists took over the Sahara desert?' 
to which the answer is one, 'nothing 
for 50 years'— and two, 'there would be 
a shortage of sand.' It seems that the 
government has for reasons not fully 
understood, an extraordinary capacity 

(a) to accomplish nothing at all, and 

(b) when it does end up In accomplish- 
ing something, it is more often a nega- 
tive than a positive. 

". . . when the government addresses 
itself to a particular problem, it seldom 
seems to explore the strategic conse- 
quences of it. So it is when we deal 
with a farming problem, public hous- 
ing, and with education. Plainly, we 
have to recognize that that particular 
amaigan of power and idealism tends 
to be presumptively the most danger- 
ous enemy not only of people who 
desire to be efficient but of people who 
desire to be free." 




KODAK S'A F t T y 





enoch 
powell, m.p. 



"It is human to wish to believe what 
is pleasant and to disbelieve what is 
unpleasant. Men are still prone to say 
of those who tell them unwelcomed 
truth, 'He hath a devil.' However, there 
is also an active principle at worl< in 
combating the admission of those facts 
which would enable error to be 
avoided. This is make-believe . . . Re- 
sistance to the shattering of make- 
believe is reinforced by a curious moral 
phenomenon. It appears to those sus- 
taining make-believe that they are 
somehow performing a moral duty so 
that willful blindness to facts or sup- 
pression of facts is sanctified . . . Once 
again, perhaps a trace of the primitive 
magical belief in the power of words 
to cause events: Don't say it, it won't 
happen; don't mention it, it won't be 
there." 



21 



wm 



y 



.^ 






# 



t 




^ 


9 


BIT 


-"""^ 


^J 




.■ ^ 








C 
CM 


^^-^^ 


>N ^ 


^ 


:^ 






CM 


^/ 


Li^ 


5^7^ 




L: 


^^ 


^\ 




V 




><^^^ 


^ 




■ ■■ 




^^ 


'^^^> 


\/\ \ 




H^ 


%^ 


^ 




a. 


%; 


" ^ 




^ 


w. 


"IH 




(0 




1^^ 


'^^ 


i^ 


^ .-^*^- 


w 




(0 


_ 


M^tisi^ 




1^^^ 








thursd 


#- 












\ 






1 


HPr 









W^' 



"^v 



^^' 



". . . okay, this isn't the way the war all is, nobody Is suggesting that. There are a lot of good soldiers 
there, there are a lot of good programs. But an awful lot of this stuff goes on. Anybody that doesn't 
think so, just remember, the Pentagon itself said they knew nothing. General Westmoreland received 
no word of My Lai-they announced this last fall-he had absolutely no word, no inclination of My 
Lai until Arnold Ridenhour wrote his letter. I'll take their word on that ... but it leaves them open 
to the inevitable charge that when something this serious, this traumatic, can go on and they have 
no Inclination . . . It's not even a question of being easy to believe. It's a question of how prevalent 
such attitudes are. I think it's much more prevalent than we've wanted to believe . . . 

"... I guess I'll iust conclude with a sad story from a vet . . . One of them was telling me the 
other day-a lot of them are angry at me because they think I popularized the myth of the average 
Gl as being an atrocity man-they think the responsibility goes much higher. One of them was telling 
me the other night-he was trying to explain why he wasn't such a bad guy. And he said he had 
been on a long range reconnalsance patrol for three or four days in the field. They were coming 
back on the outskirts of their landing zone, and they saw somebody, some Gl raping a Vietnamese 
woman. And he said 'Man, we blew them both away.' I don't want to be too subtle. Remember his 
point was. We just might kill a gook but this time we took the guy with her.' I did ask, 'Why did 
you kill the woman? " And he said, 'She wouldn't have been much good anyway.' But mind you, 
that's the way they are-they need a lot of help psychologically, et cetera . . ." 



friday 
april 23rd 




jerrold 
footlick: 

"Could each of you gentlemen 
assess why you think the cam- 
puses have been quiet, or ap- 
parently quiet this year, as op- 
posed to some of the previous 
years?" 



dr. russell kirk: 



"I think the main reason Is that on many a campus, the students 
feel that they've been used by various forces. I'll give you one sam- 
ple—after the Kent State affair last year in Ohio, the staging ground 
for protest throughout Ohio, and indeed throughout a larger region, 
was Oberlin. The SDS and other organizations came in there and 
used dormitories and other buildings as a staging ground for protest 
across the country. Well, Oberlin had a rally about a week or so 
ago with an eminent radical speaker coming. In contrast to the pre- 
vious year, only about 150 turned out, and of those 150, many were 
highly critical, very suspicious, and they made it clear they weren't 
going to march on Washington. Clearly, the sentiments were that 
they had been used at Kent State and elsewhere and don't intend 
to have their heads bashed in any more for some ideologue, whose 
motives they question." 





dr. harold taylor: 



"The campuses have become in a sense emotionally and politically 
exhausted . . . and a lot of the students who organized things last year 
have graduated; there is a new chemical compound in this year's student 
body. But just looking at it from the outside first, the situation is one 
in which the efforts by students to act politically on a national scale 
were in a sense defeated. The actual involvement of students in politics 
in the November election quite often resulted in getting the vote out, 
but then the voters would vote for the wrong man (which is discouraging 
for a new worker in the field of politics); the political situation wasn't 
one which lent itself to the wishes and ambitions of students to gain 
more political importance. 

"On the campuses, I think two things have happened: the students 
have seen more clearly the direct relationship between educational and 
social reform, and being activists, they wish to work at particular projects, 
which students have tried out in one place or another. This is more 
absorbing to them and more satisfying than either the demonstrations 
and protest which, after all, is merely a limited social instrument for 
achieving limited objectives. You can't keep on demonstrating-it loses 
any effectiveness which it can have as rhetorical theatre— because the 
people have seen the act before. And people are not responding to 
demonstrations in the same way that they used to when it was more 
of a novelty, and more a demonstration of the excitement of students 
and their wish to improve the society. I think the energy then, has been 
diverted into practical educational reform projects and away from stan- 
dard techniques of dissent and demonstration, either on war or on educa- 
tional programs." 




dr. george roche: 

"I suspect that the change which has occurred on the 
college campuses within the past year— and it is a very 
marked change, obviously— centers on the fact that the 
students have begun to perceive that there's a difference 
between power and authority. The rhetoric of as recently 
as one year ago assumed 'all power to the people,' mean- 
ing the students, that the university was a power center 
which could be taken over, and that power could be used 
to have certain reforming changes within society. Well, 
this hasn't worked out that way at ail because the uni- 
versity in fact never possessed that kind of power. The 
only thing that the university has been successfully able 
to project in the long run is a kind of authority. If you 
need to spank a child, that's the exercise of power. But, 
if in fact, you're able to handle him without doing that, 
because he respects you, because he lends credence to 
what you're telling him— that's authority. The universities 
at one time had that authority, but students mistook it 
for power, and now they discover that neither power nor 
authority exist in the present disjointed, confused, poii- 
ticalized academic community." 



dr. Clark kerr: 



"Let me say . . . two reasons which I don't think 
fit. One is that students have been used by ideolo- 
gues in the past. My contact with students indi- 
cates that they usually know what they're doing, 
that the problems of May a year ago were kind 
of welled-up in thousands and almost nlillions of 
students; they weren't being misled by some peo- 
ple for ulterior purposes. I don't think students 
can be used, very many of them, for very long. 
So I don't agree with that solution. Second, I don't 
think we have less trouble this year because stu- 
dents are any less alienated, or any less dissatis- 
fied. We still have the same problems around— of 
Vietnam, of poverty, of racial discrimination— and 
my feeling, if anything, is that the students are 
perhaps even more dissatisfied with certain things 
than they were one year ago. So, you can't say 
that all of a sudden, dissatisfaction and disaffec- 
tion disappeared. 

"My answers would be this: first of all, if you 
look at the whole history of student movements, 
they've been very volatile. They go to high peaks 
and they drop down into low valleys. Last year 
was a high peak; this year is a low valley. I don't 
think that you can draw too much either from the 
peak (that it's leading to revolution) or a valley 
(that you're going back to the '50s and the apa- 
thetic generation). One of the reasons I think we 
have this valley Is that a lot of people did get turned 
off by a lot of the violence which occurred last 
year, and summer. I also think that there is some 
additional sophistication by students as to how 
you really can approach the public and get con- 
structive results and also how much they are will- 



m 


^^^^P ^ ^ 


i 


Hft^f ■ 


1 




^ 


mtw 


^P^'f >^'' ^ 


^^n^^ 


! 1 L* 


^^^HI^^^^^^H^^^^^I 



ing to accomplish. You can pledge yourself in May 
to work for elections in November, and when No- 
vember comes along, you're doing something 
completely different. 

"If anyone is reaching the conclusion that just 
because there hasn't been any trouble this year, 
that there never would be again— I think they're 
absolutely wrong. I think the conditions are there 
of dissatisfaction and disaffection, so that it could 
break out again if there is sufficient provocation. 
I just personally hope that the problems now facing 
America get solved quickly enough and well 
enough so that it doesn't break out again. But so 
long as this nation faces the major problems which 
are now unsolved, I think we have to expect, from 
time to time, there will be major waves of student 
dissent and even student disruption." 



/ PACE 25 







^"^^ 



■t^ 





«"S 



i 



V 



>0 



mayor carl stokes: 

"I happen not to be mayor of a black city. It's 
a white city. There's 63% of Y^^i people there 
(turned that one around, huh?) Now, this is signifi- 
cant because the only way that it could be done 
was obviously by some kind of coalition. If there 
were only 35% black people there, Americans think 
that only white people vote for white people and 
black people vote for black people— I couldn't have 
gotten elected— right? So what we did was, we put 
together the black minority, we put Puerto Rican, 
we put the poor white and then we put together 
the fair-minded middle class and— I don't want to 
call him a liberal— just the fair-minded guy. It hap- 
pened that each time I'd run, I'd run against a 
slob. So my campaigns didn't test whether you 
were liberal or not— they just tested whether you 
had good sense or not . . . 

". . . I've always understood about white people 
who hate black people, and I've always understood 
the game the aristocracy of the South played 
against the white Southerner and the black South- 
erner. He put them at one another's necks while 
he exploited both of them. So I understood that 
class exploitation. But do you know that I have 
never really understood that middle-class black 
people did not like lower-economic black people? 
I never got any more hate from any group of people 
against me in Cleveland than when I moved low 
income black people into middle-income black 
neighborhoods. And let me tell you the kinds of 
reasons that they raised to me as to why I should 
not do this. In the first place they would say, 'Now 
we're all black, so you know that we don't have 
anything against these people, Stokes. But, it 
would overcrowd our schools. They have a lot of 
children. They have not had the opportunity to be 
prepared well, so it would lower the quality of our 
schools. The large number of people that would 
move in with these families would put an extra 
load on the sewers and the children would pose 
traffic hazards and overall they would contribute 
to the crime and delinquency rate of the commu- 
nity. And, finally, it's just the fact that when you 
get poor people in your neighborhood, it affects 
your property values!' That was a hell of an educa- 
tive experience for me . . ." 



michael harrington: 

"We have to begin to think socially. I suggest to you-but 
this is a piece of wisdom that does not require you to become 
a socialist to understand-the invisible hand of Adam Smith 
will not save our cities or our civilization. Our brains will do 
it if we can spend the quantities of money with some kmd 
of qualitative intelligence to deal with the problem of housing 
that is destroying the cities, is locking the poor up in them 
and is destroying not only the lives of the poor but, I tell 
you, is destroying the lives of every one of us in this society, 
if we lock poor people and black people and Chicanes up 
in cities, then those of us who are white and affluent are also 
jailers. And that's intolerable." 






t^ 



dr. edward 
banfield: , 

"We're not arguing about whether 
some people are poorer than 
others— or whether poverty is de- 
sirable. The crucial fact of the mat- 
ter is that we live in an enormously 
productive economic order, it's 
unbelievable how much it pro- 
duces and how at compound inter- 
est, so to spealt, its productivity 
increases despite the stupidities of 
the way we run things. When you're 
talking about poverty you're not 
looking forward twenty or thirty 
years-you're looking back twenty 
or thirty years. The problems are 
essentially not ones of getting the 
material requirements of a good 
life-the problems are of inculcat- 
ing the standards and values and 
tastes and ways of life that will 
make a good life for those who 
have the material requirements. 
And that Is infinitely more difficult." 



daniel p. 
moynihan: 

"You can't solve the problem of life, 
of love, of humanity— everybody dies 
sooner or later, which is kind of aw- 
ful—these things won't go away. But 
poverty can. We ought to be clear. M ike 
Harrington and i were together in those 
days when we drafted the poverty bill 
(the OEO bill in 1964), and i think we 
^.^^^ had a fairly clear idea: among other 

^^ things we were defining a problem 

which included everybody. One of the 
nice things about the word "poverty" 
is that it includes whites as well as 
blacks and they're together ... I would 
disagree with one point (made Carl 
Stokes)— that the people don't starve 
quietly— people do starve quietly. 
They've been starving quietly out there 
in the boondocks of the South for the 
^^- last 100 years. The only consolation 
they've got out of their politicians has 
been a certain kind of ugly racism that 
meant you may t>e as poor as a man 
could be, but somehow you could 
^ always be better than someisody else 
just because your neck was red and 
his neck was black . . . 

. . we're talking about this problem 
of evolution or revolution— you've got 
to understand, this is not something 
you'd like me to say to you. I can tell 
you that I really know how to stand on 
my head and make you feel wondertui 
about how wonderful we ail are and 
how we're going to go out there and 
change that roffen system and smash 
the state! You're not! You're going to 
go out, and get married, and have kids, 
^a^m^tam ^"^ wonder how'd it happen so fast?" 



dr. benjamin rogge: 

"This discussion tonight could have gone in any number of directions. 
The city is a multi-faceted operation and set of problems. We could 
have moved in that directlon-we could have talked about crime- 
there are any number of directions. We talked a great deal about 
poverty. We have solved no problems for once and for all. I think 
what we have demonstrated here, though, is the kind of process that 
gives us hope for the American society, and that is the process of 
rational discourse. It is this kind of rhetoric that gives hope for the 
long run survival, the long run viability of this society of ours." 



Saturday, april 24th 
/ george mcgovern 




"At this point, the counter-culture, 
or the youth culture, is probably the 
most potent single force in Ameri- 
can political life. I don't say it's the 
only force, but I think it's the most 
innovative and dynamic force 
that's now operating in American 
politics. That doesn't mean that the 
young people are going to decide 
the next President of the United 
States, but it does mean that their 
values, their questioning of the war 
policy, their deep concern about 
the destruction of the environment, 
their greater sensitivity to the 
problems of hunger and injustice 
and poverty, their tendency to 
question materialism as over 
against the quality of life, the spir- 
itual values of life— all of those 
things will exert a very important 
role over the next decade. And I 
think they're more closely asso- 
ciated with young people, perhaps, 
than they are with the older gener- 
ation, although there are many 
older people who are very sensitive 
to those same values. 

"I read Mr. Reich's book, The 
Greening of America, from cover 
to cover; I didn't agree with all of 
his observations, but I kept thin- 
king as I read that book, when he 
talks about the importance of lov- 
ing one another— and of reverence 
for bureaucracy and the demands 
of our material society, and trying 
to go beyond that to concern about 
our fellow humans— I kept thinking 
that's what I learned in Sunday 
school and what I learned from my 
mother and father. I think it's sort 
of New Testament doctrine. It was 
not too suprising, when I got to the 
third or fourth page from the end 
of that book, that Charles Reich 
said what I'd been trying to say 
here: We really need to live the 
Judeo-Christian ethic. We really 
need to apply the gospel of broth- 
erhood and love for our fellow 
humans, and I believe in that. I 
think that's what we need to do." 



^' 



PAGE 28 / 




/ PACE 29 



I 




Whenever McAlister Auditorium is packed to capac- 
ity for four consecutive days, tiie particular event 
that drew those crowds must be considered a suc- 
cess. And indeed, Direction '71 was viewed by most 
who participated as the most highly stimulating, 
interesting, successful program since Direction's 
beginnings four years ago. 

The institution of the Direction "Living Room' 
enabled many interested students and faculty 
members to delve further into the distinguished 
minds of the Direction speakers on a head-to-head 
basis. The forum-style presentations in McAlister 
brought to light differing opinions of speakers, and 
provided a more thought-provoking discussion than 
past Direction speeches offered. And, of course, the 
themes of the sessions were relevant and diverse 
enough to attract listeners from all corners of the 
University. 

Nevertheless, as with everything done by mere 
mortals. Direction 71 was far from perfect, as critics 
have been quick to point out. Several major criti- 
cisms center on the choice of speakers. Margaret 
Blain, former Hullabaloo editor and well-known 
anti-sexist, said in speaking for these critics, "1 
refuse to believe that there is not a woman in the 
country who is fit to sit on a platform with George 
Roche." The absence of any speaker on the pro- 
gram who could be classified as "radical" also pro- 
voked some comment. ("Can you imagine watching 
Abbie Hoffman and William Buckley fight it out on 
the stage of McAlister?" Miss Blain quipped.) And, 
indeed the presence of these interesting people on 
future Direction panels may indeed result in a good 
time for all. But is this what Direction is for? 

Perhaps it is the title "Direction" that holds the 
answer. These programs are designed to stimulate 
our thought, to get us aroused, to get us worried, 
to get us concerned, to give us direction. Then, 
hopefully, we will take it upon ourselves to actually 
go out and put to use the ideas that have been 
tunneled into our heads. 

—Rick Streiffer 

A & S '73 





/ PAGE 31 




The death of Dean John W. Lawrence brought to an 
early and untimely end the life of a man who applied the 
elements of reason and compassion to the practice of the 
profession of architecture, who taught and transmitted 
these same values to his students and contemporaries, 
and who strove to impress them upon those public officials 
to whom he so often addressed himself. John Lawrence 
was an eloquent man, an eloquent thinker and writer, and 
a profound observer and analyst of the environment by 
which he was surrounded. 

I know of no other man who could feel as deeply and 
as personally as John Lawrence. His affection for the 
persons and objects he loved knew no bounds; the disap- 
pointment that overtook him when his trust and affection 
were violated was equally great. Problems of an infinite 
variety became his concern and all were treated with the 
depth of feeling that set John Lawrence's abilities, as an 
architect, teacher, dean, and keen observer of the plight 
of man in the city, above those of all his fellow men. 

The amorphous object for which he perhaps held the 
most affection was the city of New Orleans itself. From 
the innumerable hours I spent in the presence of Dean 
Lawrence, it was obvious that his love for this city was 
incalculable. He rejoiced in the city's cultural and ethnic 
variety, its scale and proportion, its pace and way of life, 
its history and its river. He was also deeply hurt and ou- 
traged by the destruction wrought upon it by carelessly 
planned expressways, by incessant economic exploitation 
of the Vieux Carre, by the vulgarity of unplanned and 
unsympathetic suburban development, by the lack of con- 
cern for rectifying the terrible state of New Orleans hous- 
ing, by the continued non-recognition of any means of 
transport save the automobile, by the pursuit of a ques- 
tionable "progress" at the expense of the city's true mean- 
ing and reason for existence. John Lawrence's cry— for 
creating a sane and livable urban environment, for pre- 
serving and rehabilitating those elements of it that can 
be saved, and in all cases for striving for quality and 
excellence— was at many times a lonely cry. Yet his positive 
influence has been successful in many instances; unfortu- 
nately, it has been ignored in many more. 

The School of Architecture, of which he was dean, was 
another beneficiary of John Lawrence's affection. As a 



John W. 
Lawrence 

1923-1971 

The Man 

and 
His Region 



student in that school I have felt that affection very per- 
sonally. The philosophy Dean Lawrence had for the School 
of Architecture, and for all higher education, was to cul- 
tivate feelings and emotions within the student that would 
make him capable of understanding and of developing 
empathy for the problems that confront us all. At the Tulane 
Summer Conference in July, 1970, Dean Lawrence made 
a beautiful response to the question of "What are Tulane's 
priorities in goals and functions?" He said the goal of the 
University should be the "development of sensitive people 
by (1) education and (2) the transmittal of learning, includ- 
ing new learning." He spoke to the need for instilling "a 
strong ingredient of compassion" within all people. Dean 
Lawrence had those qualities within himself, and he 
showed them in all endeavors that he undertook. He con- 
stantly strove to understand his students, and if at times 
he failed, it was not because he was lacking in concern, 
but because of the genuine differences in men. Never- 
theless, the time he devoted to students and the concern 
he had for their welfare provide ample evidence to show 
that he was a truly sensitive and responsive teacher and 
human being. 

My own life has been very much enriched by my friend- 
ship with Dean Lawrence: his counsel and advice, his 
example, and his inspiration strengthened me no less than 
they strengthened others. He pointed to a better way of 
life and he taught how it could be achieved. His death 
left us with a challenge to continue the teaching. 

Ralph Wafer, June 1971 

Editor's note: 

On the following pages is the text of a paper, entitled 
"The Face of the Region," presented by Dean John W. 
Lawrence to the Goals Foundation Council task force for 
Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard Parishes on January 
9, 1971. The paper is a broad and all-encompassing state- 
ment by Dean Lawrence regarding his impressions of peo- 
ple's attitudes in the New Orleans region and his feelings 
about the direction of the region's future. What Dean 
Lawrence says in the paper shows well the depth of con- 
cern and the love he held for this region. 



THE FACE OF THE REGION 

It is taken for granted that one 
cannot be entirely objective about 
some one or some thing he loves. 
I cannot, therefore, claim 
objectivity as I try to share with 
you some of my views and 
impressions of a city, and its 
environs, which was my birth-place 
and which has alternately 
nourished and offended me for 
most of my adult life. 
Also heavily subscribed to is the 
notion that we hurt the ones we 
love— out of a distorted emotional 
concern for their welfare. My 
remarks shall certainly not be 
without emotion, but I hope will 
not hurt. They are not intended to 
do so. 

What follows is a highly personal 
portrait. It is best that way, I think. 
Another, or an infinity of others, 
with different backgrounds, values 
and vantage points, would have as 
many different portraits, even 
totally opposite. I have purposely 
avoided a statistical approach— for 
one reason, that I am not a 
statistician— and for another, they 
can be most unreliable and indeed 
deceptive indications of reality. 
When Gross National Product, for 
example, counts the tearing down 
of good old buildings as a plus in 
the same way that it counts the 
building of bad new ones, or when 
armaments production has the 
same value as education or 
housing or health, we see how 
inadequate such devices really 
are. Gross National Product or 
Gross Regional Product can tell us 
only that we may be doing a lot of 
things, but it can tell us nothing 
about whether we are doing the 
right things. Reality is too 
meta-physical for statistics. 

Is there an identifiable Region 
about which we are speaking 
today? I think there is. We are 
talking about a metropolitan area 
of somewhat over a million people 
(a third of the state's people) 
which under the protocols of the 
Regional Planning Commission 
encompasses Orleans, Jefferson 
and St. Bernard Parishes. The 
Commission itself recognizes that 
it is incomplete without St. 
Tammany Parish. But that can be 
remedied. 

It is a region whose geography is 
dominated by one of the world's 
great rivers and a remarkable 
collection of lakes and streams, 
natural beauty and more than its 
share of nature's abundance. The 
family arguments now taking place 
in our regional house disclose, if 
nothing else, that political 



boundaries and the governments 
described by them are inherently 
incapable of dealing with issues of 
geographic and cultural regional 
significance. These boundaries are 
wholly artificial— historical 
accidents— and increasingly 
operate against regional integrity. 
The issues with which we must 
deal today have nothing to do with 
these kinds of boundaries. 

The region has many faces and 
there are many components in a 
description of its anatomy: the 
land, our natural assets (and 
liabilities) the man-built 
environment and its cooperation or 
lack of same with nature, our 
institutions (education, health, 
religious, recreational, business, 
cultural, etc.), but most of all the 
region is its people, with their 
attitudes, traditions, aspirations 
and inspirations— Garden District 
blue-bloods and trappers, aspiring 
Garden District blue-bloods and 
gentlemen hunters, half-black, half 
white, down and out aristocrats 
and nouveau riche— what a 
splendid mix! Who would want to 
change it? Our ethnic richness, 
with all the inputs it invites, is one 
of our greatest assets. The 
composite is unique, and it is on 
this we must build. 

This is not to say that all is well 
with our people. Far from it. 

If I were reduced to choosing only 
one word to describe our people, I 
believe it would be tolerant. 
Squares and hippies tolerate each 
other better than in most places. 
Although it may be an historical 
accident, we are the most 
geographically racially integrated 
city in the united States of 
America. 1 shall have more to say 
about this later. 

But tolerance can have its abuses, 
and for us it is most apparent in 
that we have lost our capacity for 
outrage. And I have in mind 
especially our capacity to be 
outraged by low levels of 
governmental performance and the 
sheer callousness of some 
officialdom. It is not cause for 
concern that a man prominent in 
government remains a major 
legislative spokesman for an 
industry from which he earns more 
than a quarter of a million dollars 
a year? Or again another, who is 
supposed to be "like us" in 
conservative outlook, whose 
political career has been built 
upon the fight against "creeping 
socialism" but who has been 
earning more than a hundred 
thousand dollars a year for not 
planting cotton? One wonders who 



are the creeps and who are the 

socialists? 

Who can fail to wince when one 
sees lobbyists pressing legislators' 
voting buttons in our state 
legislature, or, despite the 
ingredients of comedy, a state 
official passing out candy and 
campaign buttons at a most 
unpropitious moment? 
It is not a question of law-breaking 
so much as the monumental 
insensitivity which wounds us 
more, I think, than we sometimes 
realize. Public officials are the 
curators of our public dignity and 
we must stop having our dignity 
abused by them. We need not be 
a humorless people in demanding 
an end to it. Certainly these are 
the kinds of things which Patrick 
Moynihan had in mind when 
recently upon taking leave of the 
President's cabinet he said, "What 
was once primarily a disdain for 
government has developed into a 
genuine mistrust". Our government 
must appear to be trustworthy 
before it can be. It is, after all, the 
only instrument for the orderly 
improvement of our social and 
cultural welfare, and the key to 
what is called quality of life. 

Closer to home there is a war 
going on. (I am not talking about 
the longest and second largest 
war in our history, and the only 
one not engaged in according to 
constitutional prescription.) I am 
talking about the war between 
Jefferson Parish and the City of 
New Orleans. The bridge 
controversy is merely a skirmish in 
the larger war— a mere footnote on 
the whole story. 

At the moment, Jefferson Parish 
can flourish or appear to prosper 
only at the expense of New 
Orleans. The lure of no taxes is 
irresistible. What will happen, of 
course, and is happening, is that 
the racial balance in New Orleans, 
one of our greatest assets, will be 
destroyed and become irreversible 
about the time Jefferson Parish 
taxes must inevitably become 
competitive. But the damage will 
have been done. And God help us 
if this region becomes what so 
many in the north have become— a 
white doughnut with a black 
center! 

There is a certain organic quality 
about our region. You can't find 
Los Angeles, even with its twelve 
million people. But here, there is a 
strong, identifiable center which of 
course is the historic City of New 
Orleans. The suburban parishes' 
fate is inexorably linked to that of 
New Orleans and if New Orleans 



goes down so will they. 
There must be an end to petty 
parochial jealousies and offenses 
taken for alleged affronts. 
Consider these issues: 
A virtually bankrupt City of New 
Orleans pays to the state seven 
times as much in property taxes as 
Jefferson Parish. That's bad 
enough. But Jefferson Parish gets 
back from the state five times as 
much as New Orleans! (Relying on 
my memory, my numbers may not 
be exact.) Now I ask you, who can 
believe in government like that? 
One can only hope that the City's 
suit for redressing this patent 
injustice will be successful. What it 
amounts to is that the people of 
New Orleans are paying the taxes 
of the people in Jefferson Parish. 

But when the Mayor of New 
Orleans proposed that a tax be 
levied on those who sleep in 
suburbs but make their living in 
New Orleans and use its services, 
and that the suburban parishes 
have a similar and reciprocal tax, 
the same spiteful legislative 
paraphernalia which kept Urban 
renewal out of this city for twenty 
years went into high gear. 

And then there is the mess about 
property assessments. Here each 
parish has its own version of an 
intolerable situation. By high 
mimillage and low assessments, 
Jefferson Qarish exacts more than 
its rightful share of revenue from 
the rest of the state, including New 
Orleans. In New Orleans it is more 
a matter of inequality of 
assessments. The matter has been 
talked to death. 

It is a problem of state-wide 
porportion— assessors brazenly 
ignoring the law they swear to 



uphold. (Incidentally, how's that 
for another side of the law and 
order issue?) It will be settled in 
the courts, and soon, we can 
hope— though not perhaps without 
constant and continuing public 
exposure. In the meantime, cracks 
are showing up in the no-tax, 
low-tax paradise, and without 
regional equality in taxation, will 
recur with greater frequency and 
be more serious in nature. 

This all suggests to me that 
without effective and cooperative 
metropolitan government, the 
problems will get worse. New 
Orleans, Jefferson, St. Bernard 
and St. Tammany comprise a 
metropolitan whole, and to repeat, 
prosperity of one part at the 
expense of another, can only be 
transient. The kinds of problems 
which exist today— in 
transportation, housing, racial 
distribution, pollution and 
environmental harmony— cannot be 
solved within arbitrary lines or 
maps. 

One face of the region is its 

physical face. An interstate 
highway roars through our center, 
trampling on a stable 
neighborhood of houses and 
shops and businesses. In the 
process, we destroyed what was 
perhaps the most beautiful grove 
of oak trees in Urban America— an 
irreplaceable luxury. We must 
never let this happen again. We 
seem to have developed 
something of a specialty for 
removing trees. Not only are trees 
beautiful, providing shape and 
texture and color and shade, but 
they are necessary to the 
sustaining of life, since they are 
very much involved with the 
oxygen-carbon-dioxide equilibrium. 




Our sub-division planning has 
been very poor, removing mature 
trees by the thousands— making a 
desert of an oasis— and replacing 
a few of them with nursery 
saplings. I know that you can't fill 
low land around trees and have 
them survive, but I also know that 
sub-divisions can be planned in 
such a way as to preserve clumps 
and groves. And who says all 
houses must be on slabs which in 
turn rest on fill? Working with the 
land and its natural features can 
give us something that other 
envy— the potential enriching of an 
indigenous architectural tradition. 

And speaking of tradition, how sad 
it is to see it perverted by shutters 
nailed on the wall, by patronizing 
scraps of ironwork and by 
mini-versions of plantation houses. 
There are obscenities other than 
the four-letter kind. We must face 
up to the fact that there has been 
an appallingly low level of public 
taste operative in our area. This 
can best be changed by a new 
commitment to quality— and the 
logical place to start is in public 
building. The design of a public 
building should not be a prize for 
a faithful or politically helpful 
friend, but should follow after a 
most careful consideration of the 
talent and other resources 
available. And this city has greatly 
neglected some of its best talent. 
It would be very much a step in 
the right direction if each division 
of government would publish 
explicitly how it hires architects 
and engineers, for example. 

No civilization in all history has 
created such ugliness as we see 
on a drive from the airport to the 
center of New Orleans. Weeds, 
shells, trash, terrible buildings and 
thousands of worse signs. It must 
surely cause a visitor to wonder if 
this is indeed a city which forgot 
to care. But what does it do to us? 
We die a little every time we pass 
through it— numbed though we 
have been to this assault on our 
senses. By contrast, the more 
recent efforts to beautify some of 
the major boulevards in Jefferson 
Parish is a very hopeful 
development. 

In Eastern New Orleans, there is a 
road proposed which is 
dangerously close to two historic 
Indian mounds. There is still time 
to make a regional asset of these. 

The presence of the past is a 
priceless advantage. Man cannot 
live only with an ever-fleeting 
present and an unknown future. 
Visible remnants of our past are 




necessary to see what and where 
we have been. It is necessary for 
our sanity. The Vieux Carre is the 
region's best known and its most 
important man-made artifact. It is 
as important for its description of 
a vital style of urban living as it is 
for its historical significance, yet 
we blandly go on building stage 
sets, caricatures of reality. Our 
capacity for editing history seems 
boundless. Neither philosophical, 
artistic nor historical impulses are 
served in the process. As 
Professor Bermard Lemann has 
observed, "flaccid historicism is 
worse than other forms of 
dustruction". 

But the Vieux Carre and the 
Garden District are not all we have 
in the way of rich environmental 
fabric. Neighborhood after 
neighborhood as catalogued 
throughout the city by Professor 
Lemann have unique stores of 
vernacular architecture. Moreover, 
these are places where people 
want to live. 

The entire community must find 
ways to re-habilitate these houses 
where necessary and to make 
them once again joyful places for 
black and white. It cannot be done 
without the help of government 
and the financial community. In 
Pittsburgh, banks have set aside a 
certain percentage of their 
reserves for these purposes with 
remarkable results. Why can't we 
do the same? 

A community in which more than 
40% of the houses are dilapidated 
or otherwise sub-standard is in 
deep trouble. Some few voices 
have been trying to alert us to this 
growing problem for a long time. 
The cost of housing is rising to the 
point where only one-fourth of the 
American public can now afford 



the median house cost of $26,000. 
The housing crisis is spreading 
rapidly to the middle class. This is 
one reason why we must look as 
much to renewal as to new 
construction. And through renewal 
we retain a city with depth and 
historical dimension. 

I am placing much hope in the 
Mayor's just announced plan to 
give the housing situation a whole 
new look. The other parishes of 
the region should be joined in this 
enterprise, for like most everything 
else, housing is a metropolitan 
matter and not merely a New 
Orleans problem. And it cannot be 
solved by the professional 
bureaucracy alone. 

We must reclaim our river for 
much more public use. The lake 
must be cleaned up. Let's make 
Canal Street beautiful. We can 
start with trees and paint, taking 
off in the process, some of the 
instant architecture that's masking 
facades of character and 
distinction. A woman with beautiful 
hair doesn't wear wigs. Of course, 
most of the signs must go, or 
we're wasting our time. We have a 
hang-up about signs in this city. 
We even came in for prominent 
inclusion in a famous book on 
environmental atrocities. 

I have not mentioned the port, but 
quite obviously, it is our most 
important economic asset and a 
source of historical pride. It 
reminds us of why we are here. 
Others can particularize better 
than I can. 

Now is it all bad? 

Of course not. 

If it were, why would I or any of us 
be here? What's wrong can be 
remedied, if we will it to be, and 
what's right can be made better. 



I was struck the other day when 
three former students visited the 
School on a Christmas holiday. 
Highly sophisticated young men, 
one is working as an architect in 
Amsterdam, another as a VISTA 
volunteer in New Hampshire, and 
the third is a graduate student at 
UCLA. If there wasn't something 
good for them about New Orleans, 
they wouldn't have been here. 
They lived here long enough to 
know the city and came to 
appreciate its qualities enough to 
come again. There are many 
others like them. 

What is the source of this appeal? 
If it were easily described it 
wouldn't be worth having; and to 
describe it adequately is more than 
I can do. We can be sure it is 
compounded of the excitement of 
a great port, beautiful treed 
streets, layers of sophistication 
and naivete, a sense of place and 
identity, a civilized pace, charming 
neighborhoods which offer hope 
that the suburban antiseptic is not 
the only option, and perhaps it is 
even enriched on occasion by our 
colorful and pragmatic politics. Of 
one thing we can be certain— it is 
not based upon bigness. San 
Francisco is rejoicing because it 
has slipped from California's 
second to its fourth city in size. 
Venice is not large but the world 
comes to its door. The modest 
Mediterranean cities of Aries, 
Aix-en-Provence and Antibes are 
highly civilized places. 
Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami 
need not be our models. They are 
one thing, we another. If we set as 
our goal the making of a city 
which we want to live in— a decent 
and civilized place— and are willing 
to pay for it with money, 
imagination and energy, there will 
be no shortage of tourists. 

Cities' roles change in history. A 
narrow preservationist aloofness 
which fails to comprehend the 
dynamics of contemporary life will 
not do. Nor will the speculator who 
thinks the problem is to satisfy 
intricate government regulations 
instead of human needs do 
anything but harm. A sense of 
wholeness is needed by all. and 
along with it an uncompromising 
subscription to quality. 

From this alone, miracles can 
happen. 

John W. Lawrence, FAIA 

Professor of Architecture and 
Dean, Sctiool of Architecture, 
Tulane university 

9 January 1971 






I 




PACE 36 / 







Alpha Omega Alpha: Richard Thomas Anderson, Thomas Brandt Anderson, Laurence Warren Arend, James 
Stewart Bonnet, Jr., Isaac William Browder, Archie Watt Brown, Jr., Ronald Wilfred Busuttil. Benita Synar 
Carson, Stanley David Carson, Joseph Alan Chiapella, Harriette Anne Clay, Clifford Loren Coleman. David 
Michael Jarrott, Robert Joseph Kaminski, Glenn Earl Lambert, Jr., Douglas Mann Landwehr, Robert Alar 
Lipson, Charles Gordon Long, Jack Colbert Morgan, III, Arthur Joseph Nussbaum, William Ellis O'Mara 
John Edward Rea, III, Robert Edward Roybal, and Andrea Lynn Starrett. Alpha Sigma Lambda: Richard 
P. Berry, Alma Blasini, Barbara Bouden, Karen Jahncke, Frank A, Jones, Jr., George W. MacArthur, John 
E. May, Ronald J. Ragas, Jack W. Randolph, and Betty Russell. Assets: Martha Azar. Irene Briede, Mary 
Carrigan, Mimsy Fitzpatrick, Karen Meador, Paula Perrone, Kay Sampson, Diane Sanderson, Sheelah Strong, 
and Louise Wolf. Beta Gamma Sigma: Jerome T. Broussard, John M. Caldwell, Maj. Joseph C. Conrad, 
Maj. Merle Freitag, Maj. Noel D. Gregg, Maj. Jack H. Griffith, Jr., Maj. John C. House, Johnnie M. Jackson, 
Jr., Paul F, Livaudais, David J. Manifold, George A. McCammon, Capt. James F. Mullen, Capt. Walter L. 
Perry, Maj. John L. Rafferty, Jackson S. Robbins, Ashton J. Ryan, Jr., Capt. Melvin E. Schick, Jr., Richard 
L. Simmons, Gerardo ten Brink, and Capt. Jay E. Vaughn. Kappa Delta Phi: Andrew W. Allen. Bruce Feingerts 
John McCarron, Jr., George Nelson, Jr., Robert B. Schwartz, Leon M. Trice, Eric William Vetter, and Ralph 
E. Wafer. Mortar Board: Margaret Blain, Claudette Campbell, Shelley Dorfman, Muffet Fonte, Lynn Freeman, 
Sandra Hartley, Laurel Malowney, Jill Myers, Pat Prins, Cynthia Stevens, Anna Wade, Juanita Weisbach. 
and Jane Zimmerman. Omicron Delta Kappa: Leiand P. Bennett, Gregory Bertucci, Richard H. Bretz, Jr.. 
Floyd A. Buras, Jr., Alvin James Cox, Michael B. Farnell, Bruce L. Feingerts, Edmond G. Feuille, Jr., James 
B. Florey, Stephen M. Henry, Jac D. Irvine, John Kuypers, Keith D. LaRose, Sidney G. Marlow, Jr., Claude 

A. Mason, John D. McCarron, Jr., George D. Nelson, Jr., Sidney H. Phillips, Jr., Lehman K. Preis, Jr., Mark 

B. Steepler, Robert H. Thomas, Thomas W. Twiford, John H. Walsh, Robert A. Warriner, III, Robert V. Wiggins, 
Wayne S. Woody, and Alan J. Yesner. Order of the Coif: William Edward Brown. Robert Reisch Casey, 
Anita Hamann Ganucheau, David Arthur Kerstein, Geoffrey Herr Longenecker, David Anthony Marcello, 
Malcolm Andrew Meyer, Joseph Leon Parkinson, Lyie Robert Philipson, Donald Alan Shindler, Judy Nicholas 
Tabb, and Walter Chillingworth Thompson. Jr. Phi Beta Kappa: Randall Kirk Albers, Charles William Allen, 
Jr., John William Audick, James Daly Austin, Joseph Edward Baggett, Thomas Donald Barton. Nancy Dale 



/ PACE 3'i 



Berk, Sidney Joseph Bertucci, Charles Walter Brown, Diane Burnside, Sheliey Lee Citron, Susan Faye Clade, 
William Henry Cummings, III, James Gardner Dalferes, Shelley Fonda Dorfman, Nell Ann Duncan, Harris 
Gregory Effron, Alton Lynn Ellison, Jr., Steven Bruce Feder, Steven Allen Felsenthal, James Henry Fife, 
Sharon Leslie Flashman, Katharine Fraser, Carol Ann Freeman, Lynn Foster Freeman, Jacqueline Friedman, 
James Rufus Garts, Jr., Ted Wayne Gay, Raymond Phillip Gordon, Dennis Gerard Gregoire, Jay Eduard 
Gruber, Barbara Bolton Hall, Patricia Doran Hanks, Virginia Harris, Stephen Michael Henry, Rose Marie 
Hom, Richard Povi^ell Hoover, Martha Igert, Margaret Lamb Johnson, Julie Diann Kampen, Dennis Kasimian, 
May Kay, Monty Krieger, Lee Hamilton Latimer, Richard Dana Lester, John Graham McCarron, Jr., Mary 
Jane McClintock, Michael Kenneth McClure, Clyde William McCurdy, Jr., Mary Edie Meredith, Gayle Louise 
Monroe, Deborah Gail Morris, Edward James Moskowitz, lleana C. Oroza, Arthur Franklin Paulina, Harriet 
Louise Porzig, James Piercey Price, Jo D. Bounds Reed, Eleanor Conway Siley, James Michael Riopelle, 
William Alan Robinson, Louis James Rovelli, Charles Sanford Ruark, Jr., Robert Edward Ruderman, William 
Terrence Schreier, Sarah Culbertson Scott, Charles Marshall Sevadjian, Tamra Sindler, Shari Dianne Sobel, 
Martha Jane Stein, Cynthia Ann Stevens, Dennis Ronald Stewart, Mark Benjamin Stoopler, Rose Marie 
Smith Strain, Justin Tally, Katherine Ann Templeton, Dorothy Carroll Toby, Cristine Marie Traxler, Stephen 
Vann, Russell Moreland Weaver, Alison Weinberg, Riki Pauline Weinstein, Henri Wolbrette, III, and Martha 
Jane Zimmerman. Tau Beta Pi: Ashton Benjamin Avegno, Jr., Jeb Stuart Baumann, Lionel Michael Cobo, 
Jack Carl Detweiler, Richard Charles Dusang, Hugh Henry Fuller, III, Daniel Paul Garcia, Michael Francis 
Hein, Michael Allan Knapp, Robert Joseph L'Hoste, Jr., Hugh Joseph McClain, Jr., Stephen Anthony Murphy, 
Helen Corinne Pattison, Ted Steven Silver, Philip Nathan Styne, James Clark Tudor, and Thomas William 
Twiford, Jr. Who's Who: David Bauman, Bill Behrenett, Marcia Bennett, Nancy Berk, Margaret Blain, Claudette 
Campbell, Sharon Carrigan, Claude Clayton, Mark Davis, Kenneth Ducote, Clark Durant, Mike Farnell, Bruce 
Feingerts, Sharon Flashman, Mike Florie, Muffet Fonte, Cory Frantz, Barbara Hall, Sandra Hartley, Mike 
Henry, Mac Hyman, Jim Koontz, John Laborde, Lucy Lane, Chuck Leaness, Richard Lester, Sallie Lowenstein, 
Irwin Mandelkern, Randy Marcus, Jill Meyers, John Mueller, George Nelson, lleana Oroza, Rusty Palmer, 
Pat Prins, Charles Redmond, Kenneth Sanderson, Terry Schreier, Dick Sharpstein, Marian Shostrum, Shari 
Sobel, Cynthia Stevens, Mike Stropler, Robert Thomas, Lee Trice, Thomas Twiford, Jr., Anna Wade, Michael 
Wall, Gordon Weil, Riki Weinstein, Alice Wilbert, Carolyn Woosley, Stephen Zagor, and Jane Zimmerman. 



PAGE 38 / 




f^JZm^IL..Zm^^ 


jj^ 




!«r* «r" :^ 


'1 BBi 


'j,rc" 


t ^ — ■ 






■ 


< 




IJ 


1 


B 


"*^ 




ti^ 


S 


ih^rfirrrrrii 


w^-'-"***^^" 






^H m -_i-» ^E 



■■»ii»-"" 



Qnd ikfw 




Nowadays, peace is "in" with pot, tine war is "out" with Weejuns, 
Pony tails have parted and the letter sweater moved 
to other styles and fashions that symbolized the sixties 
and show the changing mood of the student generation. 

Psychedelic light shows, sounds and high pitched screeches 
reflect a different tempo from the fifties. 
Protocol has bowed to bodies, beads and bells, 
as we enter a new era of expression. 

The media is serving to integrate the nation 
and provide identity for groups that were apart; 
students were scattered in fifty different states, 
then politics and protest were presented. 

Begun at Berkeley and explosively contagious, 

like a chain reaction, violence was in vogue, 

and riot raged the campus over civil rights and ROTC, 

Til understanding rifted way past all repair. 

Some marched to save the movement 

and indeed, it is significant that peace is sought instead of war 

and love instead of hate; 
but can we weld the worlds of workers and our parents 
when opinions of the young and old are opposite? 

We vocalize our views out of interest and involvement: 
Galley and Cambodia are objects of concern. 

Students speed, but not with Spiro and are scared by our technology- 
IBM computer cards, gigantic corporations threaten 
individuality we've been trying to retain. 

The youngest generation to take an active part 

because higher education has given us an insight to the workings 

of the world. 
And we are taught to question and investigate the unknown 
so that progress can occur. 

We are concerned with the quality of country 

and are seeking sets of values somewhat different from before. 

Some have withdrawn to water beds and farms 

along a hippie frontier of new freedoms. 

And whether we are like this is a purely private issue 
but at least we are aware of the trends taking hold 
for through communications college has expanded beyond 
beyond the quad of Newcomb and New Orleans. 

The campus is a meeting ground for many varied types, 
and here we learn to tolerate the others. 
Each is exposed to what she never knew, 
comprising the microcosm of experience. 





Here we've had a healthy mix of 

debutantes and activists, followers, and senate leaders, 

model types and blue jeans joiners, intellectuals and the jet set, 

mesh their tones and temperaments together. 

White crosses on the quad to commemorate the dead, 
Panty raids and football games, doughnuts in the dorm, 
Pass-fail through petition, still parties with the Dean, 
make for motley memories of the changing college scene. 

But with all this talk of demonstrations, one must not forget 
that students can cooperate and through committees settle 
issues that have brought our peers 
to the brink of revolution. 

Newcomb has given us the chance to participate 
in the decision-making process of the college, 
and our administration has tried to be responsive 
to student sensitivity and gripes. 

On the levee by the River, jazz and Bourbon Street, 
Basin blues, red beans and rice, Creoles, Cajuns, shrimp, 
are vestiges of culture in crescent city history 
of which we could partake. 

Artichokes and white magnolias, oaks and muffelattas, 

Lake Ponchartrain, the Park, the streetcar on St. Charles, 

and Mardi Gras to gather beads, say, throw me something mister, 

will remind us of this four-year Delta setting. 

This is a rather peaceful place 
where there are traces of tradition 
to allow a quiet gentleness 
the freedom to prevail. 

We go into the seventies from our college microcosm, 
sort of as a bridge, for our class has spanned two decades, 
where we hope to be accepted as women, yes, but more, 
as educated people who contribute what they know. 

With memories of the old and ideas of the progressive, 

we introduce ourselves to you Mrs. Davis. 

the Newcomb Alumna.c Association and to the world of our future endeavors. 

and perhaps, to the greening of America, as the class of 1971. 



—Cynthia Stevens, Newcomb '71, 

"Little Commencement" 

Newcomb College, May 29. 1971 




I PAGE 41 








i:ii5|ir_-!^J>_ 









". . . It is a simple enough theme I want to put before 
you this morning: that in these harsh and strenuous times, 
we have a profound need for exercising both compas- 
sionate involvement and rational detachment in dealing 
with our public troubles. Concern without rationality is 
inept sentimentalism; rationality without concern, callous 
manipulation. Now, as often before, we have an urgent 
need for both compassion and reason. 

". . . It is not, I venture to suggest, a new deterioration 
in the structure and practice of our society which is 
producing our present discontents. Rather, it is the emer- 
gence of a new sensibility. Having raised our sights and 
moral expectations, we become more sensitive to long- 
existing inequities in our society and to its imperfectly 
realized potentials for a humane life. In growing numbers, 
we Americans direct our critical attention to the weal<- 
nesses of our society just as we have long directed our 
admiring attention to its strengths. In this process of 
collective self-scrutiny, the more we demand of our so- 
ciety, the more faults we naturally find. And we are be- 
coming an exceedingly demanding people and a self-cri- 
tical society. What was good enough before, in the form 
of convenient compromise with principle, is no longer 
judged good enough today. New priorities of values are 
in the making. More and more Americans, even some 
of those in the halls of Congress, are stirring themselves 
out of a complacency induced by the fat and prosperous 



years to ask the harder questions: affluence for what? 
for whom? and what beyond affluence? 

". . . The new sensibility involves an enlarged sense of 
collective responsibility for what takes place in society. 
Above all else, it exacts increasing accountability. It re- 
quires a public accounting by those who govern our 
organizations and direct our institutions, for it takes with 
a new seriousness the old idea that every private en- 
terprise is invested with a public interest. Organizations 
in every sphere— business and religion, education and 
politics, science and technology— are being held ac- 
countable for acts of commission and omission to a 
degree not known before. And at least the most authentic 
exponents of the new sensibility know that this cuts both 
ways: that they, the public critics, are also to be held 
accountable for their acts of commission and omission. 
They do not ask for a double standard in which the others 
are to be held to the standards of a ntoral discipline which 
they allow themselves to escape. 

"To the distant outsider, the many new sensibles are 
easily confused with the small number of the new irre- 
sponsibles. But there is a great difference between them, 
all the difference that matters. The new sensibles know 
that ends are inseparable from the means adopted to 
achieve them. They know that corrupt means corrupt 



PAGE 42 / 





idealistic ends. They know, too, that extremists of the 
right and extremists of the left in effect join forces in 
an interactive cycle of destructiveness by adopting the 
doctrine and the practice of 'anything goes.' They know 
that those who would maintain our institutions unchanged 
'at any cost' are of a kind with those who would destroy 
these institutions 'at any cost.' 

The new sensibles are radical in the strict sense of 
trying to get to the roots of our public troubles, of trying 
to get down to fundamentals. But again, this authentic 
humane commitment has nothing to do with the self- 
described idealists on the fringe who only exhibit in them- 
selves what they condemn in others. These are the irre- 
sponsibles in every aspect. Demanding accountability 
from others, they refuse to be held accountable for their 
own behavior, either individual or collective. For the old 
irresponsibility of laissez faire, they deny others the op- 
portunity to dissent from them, imposing instead the 
tyranny of the crowd, with hectoring taunts drowning out 
authentic dialogue. Ostensibly concerned to do away with 
the vicious epithets of race and religion, they invent a 
vocabulary of hate all their own. Protesting violence 
abroad and at home, they take pride in their own violence, 
on and off campus. Opposing racism and sexism, they 
manage to create a doctrine of agism which pits the 
generations against one another. The unattractive self- 
righteousness of some of the old they replace by an 



unattractive self-righteousness of the young. Given to 
extremes, they would replace gerontocracy by juveno- 
cracy, rule by the very old with rule by the very young, 
unmindful that young and old. black and white, we are 
all in this together . . . 

". . . You of the graduating class can aptly say, in 
paraphrase of Eliot's Thomas Becket: ". . . four years 
is no brevity, we shall not get these four years back 
again." And an occasion celebrating these years in your 
lives clearly calls for a peroration. Here, then, is mine. 
It is for us all to recognize the profound difference be- 
tween the new sensibility, which is our hope, and the 
new irresponsibility, which is our burden. Possessed by 
a belief in inevitable progress, we Americans have long 
been a nation of Pollyannas: we need not become a 
nation of Cassandras. We need not oscillate between an 
irrepressible optimism and an irrepressible pessimism. 
Other options for raising the quality of civil life are open 
to us. And chief among these is the option provided by 
the authentic new sensibility: the option of being humane 
in our commitments, critical in our judgments and com- 
passionate in our practices. May we all exercise that 
option for the rest of our days." 

—Dr. Robert King Merton 

Commencement Address 

May 31. 1971 



I PACE +3 





Those 

who 

have 

made 

it, 
1971 




I 








/ PACE 45 




COLLEGE OF ARTS 
AND SCIENCES 

BACHELOR OF ARTS 

William Alan Robinson, summa cum laude 
with honors in Psychology, Leawood, Kansas. 
Randall Kirk Albers, magna cum laude with 
honors in English, Dundas, Minnesota. 
TWO DIRECTIONS: 



DIRECTION #1- 
Sensitivity 
Intensity 
Reality 
Humanity 
Stifled 
Struggling 
Jabbed 
Juggling 
I am! 



DIRECTION #2- 

And Tulane, shining 
Southern citadel, 
impotent in her 
illusions of past 
and delusions of 
future greatness 

Going down as all 
good Southern- 
ers— with nobility. 
Going down all the 
same 

And eight thousand 
babies in her 
womb crying. 
Don't take me with 
you— Mother. 

James Daly Austin, magna cum laude with 
honors in Political Science, Burleson, Texas. 
Thomas Donald Barton, magna cum laude 
with honors in Political Science, Omaha, Ne- 
braska. 

Steven Allen Felsenthal, magna cum laude 
with honors in Political Science, Tampa, 
Florida. 

James Piercey Price, magna cum laude with 
honors in Sociology, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
William Terrance Schreier, magna cum laude 
with honors in History, Prairie Village, Kansas. 
Stephen Andrew Vann, magna cum laude with 
honors in Spanish, Montgomery, Alabama. 
Kenneth Wauchope, magna cum laude with 
honors in Theatre, New Orleans. 
Henri Wolbrette, III, magna cum laude with 
honors in Economics, New Orleans. 
Jerome Albert Brown, Jr., cum laude with 
honors in Anthropology, San Antonio, Texas. 
Mark Stephen Davis, cum laude with honors 
in Political Science, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
Steven Bruce Feder, cum laude with honors 
in Political Science, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 
"Whether universal suffrage prevails or not. 



always it is an oligarchy that gov- 
erns."-Vilfredo Pareto, The Treatise 
Russell Duane Pulver, cum laude with honors 
in History, Sulphur, Louisiana. 
Russell Moreland Weaver, cum laude with 
honors in English, Tupelo, Mississippi. 
Gordon Weil, III, cum laude with honors in 
Economics, Cincinnati, Ohio. 
John Paul Campbell, III, with honors in Soci- 
ology, Ruston, Louisiana. 
The sword we used to kill the king now threa- 
tens us. We believed we would at last be free 
to possess that blank-verse of the mind so 
necessary for true freedom: we can now walk 
among the flowers in an ever enlarging circular 
path. 

Robert Christopher Goodwin, with honors in 
Political Science, Bethesda, Maryland. 
Phillip Harvey Hoffman, with honors in Chem- 
istry, Olivette, Missouri. 
Thomas Newman Ireland, with honors in En- 
glish, New Orleans. 

Bruce Ross King, with honors in Anthropology, 
New Orleans. 

John Robert Sutter, with honors in Sociology, 
Marion, Indiana. 

Judson Eugene Tomlln, Jr., with honors in 
Sociology, Mobile, Alabama. 
Roger Alan Wagman, with honors in Psychol- 
ogy, Bristol, Pennsylvania. 
"I saw that the meaning of life was to secure 
a livelihood, and that its goal was to attain 
a high position; that love's rich dream was 
marriage to an heiress; that friendship's bless- 
ing was help in financial difficulties; that wis- 
dom was what the majority assumed it to be; 
that enthusiasm consisted in making a speech; 
that it was courage to risk the loss of ten 
dollars; that kindness consisted in saying, 'You 
are welcome,' at the dinner table; that piety 
consisted in going to communion once a year. 
This I saw, and I laughed."— Kiergekaard 
Charles David Abercrombie, History, Semi- 
nary, Mississippi. 

Ralph Roger Alexis, III, History, New Orleans. 
CharlesWilliam Allen, Jr., cum /aude, History, 
Silver Spring, Maryland. 
Arthur Moffett Allison, III, English, Versailles, 
Kentucky. 

Richard Royen Anderssen, Jr., Economics, 
Brick Town, New Jersey. 
Samuel Henry Andrews, Psychology, Citron- 
elle, Alabama. 

Arthur Morris Aronson, Sociology, New Or- 
leans. 



Joseph Edward Baggett, cum laude, Political 
Science & History, Jacksonville, North Caro- 
lina. 

Stewart Roland Barnett, III, Economics, New 
Orleans. 

James Manly Barton, II, Political Science, 
Shreveport, Louisiana. 

Brian Alan Bash, English, Shaker Heights, 
Ohio. 

Charles Cassidy Bass, III, Sociology, New 
Orleans. 

David John Bertau, English, Ponchatoula, 
Louisiana. 

Ronald Stephen Bertucci, History (Conferred 
Posthumously), New Orleans. 
Brent Bevers Bike, English, Reading, Pennsyl- 
vania. 
Jon V. Blake, Spanish & Biology, Baytown, 
Texas. 

Robert Louis Blum, Political Science, New 
York, New York. 

Joe Edd Boaz, Political Science, Anson, 
Texas. 

Thou Shalt not kill, slaughter, execute, napalm, 
attack, subjugate, hate, or prejudice human 
beings as American tradition and values dic- 
tate. An immediate change is required hope- 
fully through process, if not, then through any 
expedient form of revolution. 
Lester Daniel Bockow, History, Great Neck, 
New York. 

David Wells Bond, English, Dordrecht, The 
Netherlands. 

David Coriell Booth, History, Bellaire, Texas. 
"New Orleans ... a courtesan whose hold 
is strong upon the mature, to whose charm 
the young must respond. And all who leave 
her, seeking the virgin's unbrown, ungold hair 
and her blanched and icy breast where no 
lover has died, return to her when she smiles 
across her languid fan."— Faulkner 
Ralph Stewart Bowden, English, Coral Gables, 
Florida. 

Stephen Wayne Boyd, History, Clovis, New 
Mexico. 

Robert James Brennan, Jr., cum laude, En- 
glish, St. Petersburg, Florida. 
John Jacob Broders, History, New Orleans. 
Charles Walter Brown, cum laude. Psychol- 
ogy, Baltimore, Maryland. 
Clifford Allen Brown, Political Science, Para- 
gould, Arkansas. 

Joseph Ross Brown, Jr., English, Pekin, Illi- 
nois. 

Joseph Glen Bruce, Economics, Kingsport, 
Tennessee. 

Bruce Albert Burga, Economics, New Orleans. 
Johnny Lee Burns, Psychology & French, 
Fayetteville, North Carolina. 
Frank Robinson Burnside, Jr., History, Ne- 
wellton, Louisiana. 

David Arthur Bybee, Economics, New Orleans. 
Clegg Caffery, Jr., English & Geology, Frank- 
lin, Louisiana. 

Robert Michael Caldwell, Economics, Baton 
Rouge, Louisiana. 

David Byron Campell, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

"Those things for which the most money is 
demanded are never the things which the 
student most wants. Tuition, for instance, is 
an important item in the term bill, while for 
the far more valuable education which he gets 
by associating with the most cultivated of his 
contemporaries no charge is made."— 
Thoreau, 1854 

John Edward Carey, II, Sociology, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland. 

Howard Philip Carnes, cum laude, Economics, 
College Park, Georgia. 
Kenneth Michael Chackes, Psychology, St. 
Louis, Missouri. 



PAGE 46 / 



Yeu Jwo Chin, Political Science, New Orleans 
Claude Feemster Clayton, Jr., Political 
Science, Tupelo, Mississippi 
Crawford Haralson Cleveland, Jr., English, 
Gulfport, Mississippi 

James Michael Collins, History, New Orleans, 
Stanley James Cooper, Psychology, Prince- 
ton, New Jersey, 

Robert Sherod Corbitt, Music, Louisville, 
Georgia 

Robert Hunter Couvlllon, History, Marl<sville, 
Louisiana, 

Alexander Brown Coxe, History, Greenwich, 
Connecticut, 

Edward Edgar Crocker, Jr., History, Sante Fe, 
New Mexico. 

Paul Edward Crow, History, Dallas, Texas. 
Stephen Charles Curtis, Psychology, Daven- 
port, Iowa. 

John Nicholas Cusano, Political Science, 
Orange, Connecticut. 

James Gardner Dalleres, cum laude. History, 
Mobile, Alabama. 
A-ONE, A-TWO! 
A-HELL OF A HULLABALOO! 
A-HULLABALOO, RAY RAY! 
A-HULLABALOO, RAY RAY! 
HOORAY, HOORAY! 
VARS, VARS, T-AY! 
TULAME! 

William Francis Danaher, Political Science, 
New Orleans. 

Arturo Edward D'Angelo, cum laude. History, 
Hubbard, Ohio, 

Richard Charles Danysh, Political Science, 
San Antonio, Texas. 

Robert Sherwood Dawalt, Jr., Music, Cranford, 
New Jersey. 

Dominick Joseph Dei Carlino, Jr., Philosophy, 
Haddonfield, New Jersey. 
Robert Sylvester Devins, Political Science, 
North Miami, Florida, 
Ish bibbly often botten, 
bee bop ta teeten totten, 
Owls! Owls! Night Owls! 
Charles Edward DeWitt, Jr., Political Science, 
Houston, Texas. 

George Wilfred DIggs, Jr., Biology, New Iberia, 
Louisiana. 

Richard B. Dobkin, Political Science, Pitts- 
burgh, Pennsylvania. 
"Cookie! Cookie!" 

John William Dommerich, Psychology, Coral 
Gables, Florida. 

John Clay Dorris, English, Biloxi, Mississippi. 
John Hamilton Downs, Anthropology, Cherry 
Hill, New Jersey 

Frederick Bradford Drake, Jr., Political 
Science, Allentown, Pennsylvania, 

JImmie Louis Dresnick, Political Science, 

Miami, Florida 

Charles Louis Duke, History, Chicago, Illinois, 

William Clark Durant, III, Economics, Grosse 

Pointe, Michigan. 

David Floyd Edwards, History, New Orleans, 

Terence David Edwards, Political Science, 

Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. 

Richard Wayne Elchenholz, Psychology, 

Louisville, Kentucky 

Roy Steven Elkin, Philosophy, Miami, Florida, 

James Sewell Elliott, Jr., Political Science, 

Macon, Georgia. 

Peter John Emigh, Economics, Wauwatosa, 

Wisconsin. 

Chris IVIcKinney Evans, Political Science, 

Jackson, Mississippi 

Timothy Russell Farmer, History, Naples, 

Florida. 

George Edward Ferguson, Economics, Fort 

Worth, Texas. 



Grey Flowers Feris, History, Vicksburg, Mis- 
sissippi 

Thomas Norling Fiddler, History, New Orleans, 
Carl William Flesher, Jr., Psychology, Rock- 

ville, Maryland 

Leo Anthony Fox, English, Boca Raron, 

Florida. 

Philip Leon Frank, Jr., Economics, New Or- 
leans. 

Gordon Marc Gaeihe, Psychology, Metairie, 

Louisiana. 

James Rufus Garts, Jr., cum laude. History, 

Rolling Meadows, Illinois. 

Michael Roy Geerkin, Sociology, New Orleans, 

An easy windy 

sleepy grass 

snuggles over 

fresh young 

blush red 

bodies 

in the twilight 

Michael Edward Gerlnger, History, Nashville, 

Tennessee, 

Steven Lee Gilmer, English, Birmingham, Ala- 
bama, 

Alan Barry Goer, Economics, Charleston, 

South Carolina, 

Victor Manuel Gomez, Psychology, Call, Co- 
lumbia. 

James Comstock Goodwin, Theatre, New Or- 
leans. 

Raymond Phillip Gordon, cum laude. Political 

Science, Glencoe, Illinois. 

Thomas Dodge Graffagnino, Sociology, Co- 
lumbus, Georgia, 

Robert Earl Griffon, Economics, Cristobal, 

Canal Zone, 

Harvey Mitchell Grossman, Psychology, 

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 
Jay Eduard Gruber, cum laude. Economics, 
Memphis, Tennessee. 

Edward John Gschwender, Jr., History, Fulton, 
New York, 

Gordon Bernard Gsell, Jr., English, New Or- 
leans, 

Christopher Delaney Gwin, Economics, Ada, 
Oklahoma. 

Martin Richard Haase, English, Ghalmette, 
Louisiana. 

John Wade Haley, Political Science, Bir- 
mingham, Alabama, 

John David Harmatz, Economics, Baltimore, 
Maryland. 

William Robertson Harmon, III, Political 
Science, Tangier, Morocco, 
Andrew Chris Heinrichs, Political Science, 
Fort Worth, Texas, 

The time goes quickly, but what the hell— it 
was a lot of fun I'm not about to espouse any 
major philosophies, but would rather spend 
the time remembering all the thrills and joys 
of the GREEN WAVE and the UNIVERSITY 
INN-AND REMEMBER CHOICE D-WHO 
GIVES A SHIT? 

Edward Joseph Hemard, III, History, New Or- 
leans, 

Joel Jerome Henderson, Political Science, 
Greenville, Mississippi. 
There is more to be learned in four years of 
college than what is found in books, I have 
learned this— 

Stephen Michael Henry, cum laude. History, 
Natchitoches, Louisiana. 
Thanks and a hat-tip to; H., John, Kid, Rusty, 
Jake, Craig, Stan, George, Greg, David, Pat, 
Joe, Coach, Terry, Duh, Sponz, Pud, Gere, 
Winston, Kay, Curly, Larry, Moe, and that about 
wraps it up 

Robert Dale Hertzberg, Sociology, Bayonne, 
New Jersey 

Dale Richard Hilding, Political Science & Latin 
American Studies, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, 
"Que acredito so ventura, morir querdo y vivir 



loco," For II he like a madman lived, at least 
he like a wise one died —Cervantes: Don Qui- 
xote 

Jeffrey Alan HIrsch, History, North Miami 
Beach, Florida. 

Fuck the games and the machine: bless the 
people 

Farrell Douglas Hockemeier, English & Psy- 
chology, Richmond, Missouri. 
"Dear Mr, Hockemeier: We are sorry to have 
to report that we are unable to act favorably 
on your application for admission. With ap- 
proximately 3,500 applicants for our 165 avail- 
able places, we have had to reject a great 
many candidates of the highest caliber. We 
trust that you will be successful in pursuing 
a career in the law, and we regret our inability 
to include you in our entering class. Sincerely 
yours, Yale Law School." EAT POOP 
Robert Allen Hoffman, cum laude. English. 
Great Neck, New York, 

Richard Powell Hoover, III, cum laude. Politi- 
cal Science, Elizabeth, New Jersey. 
LCNFF ILLCDS NZIDO UITDC WURVX ZSJZC 
DGGKD SCWPP MFLCS ILHHH XTELB 
GHYCY OPTEJ YGZEM MPPHE MCYOZ 
CRHAW LUYZV HINLT YDGGK KTMZV 
LESWL HOVYD ECOGA MOHTH PHYPE 
UGGAZ ZHHTN LEXBS KMNPL OTFXK 
SWWZX STDGL OUBBH PPYZM ANATH 
AMDSL DFYSX MRYAP LUYXV This is a po- 
lyalphabetic substitution using the Vigenere 
tableau The keyphrase is GO TO HELL LSU 
Mark Richard Horowitz, History. Niles, Illinois. 
ODE TO TULANE: 
If one should stick his finger in his navel 

and decide the world is sick. 
He also should remember where he chose 

the spot his finger is to pick: 
For while he sits and ponders over all the 

horrors that before him lie. 
He should consider soon his stomach will 
begin to bleed and he shall die! 
Ward Ackert Howard, Political Science, Fori 
Worth, Texas. 

Charles Edward Hucks, History, Jacksonville. 
Florida 

Robert Charles Irvine, History. New Orleans 
Peter Andrew Jacobson, History, Coral 
Gables, Florida 

Gregg Allen Johnson, Philosophy, Claremont, 
California. 

Bruce Sidney Johnston, Political Science. New 
Orleans, 

John Paul Juhasz, History, New Haven, Con- 
necticut. 

George Stephen Kantor, Political Science, 
Yonkers, New York. 

Ronald Ivan Kaplan, Spanish. Atlanta, Geor- 
gia, 

Miles Butler Kehoe, Psychology, Metairie. 
Louisiana. 

The memory is like a tape player recording 
day to day experience. May we play back from 
what we remember. 

Charles Francis Kelley, Jr., cum laude. Ger- 
man, Plainfield, New Jersey, 
Since I am in the "over-SO" age group, I feel 
that I can present a slant different from that 
of my younger classmates— the weather the 
past four years has been great!!! 
Thomas Nelson Kennedy, Jr., History, Sterl- 
ing, Kentucky. 

Stewart Joseph Kepper, Jr., History, New Or- 
leans. 

Michael Joseph Khourl, Economics. Paducah. 
Kentucky. 

Barney Dean King, Economics, Cliftonville, 
Mississippi. 

Richard Owen Kingrea, History, Seabrook, 
Texas 

Bruce Steven Kingsdorf, Psychology. Bala 
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. 
John Christopher KIrchner, Philosophy, 
McLean, Virginia. 



/ PACE 47 



Manuel Lisandro Knight, Economics, Wash- 
ington, District of Columbia. 
The Tulane Student Body is a good follower— It 
eventually picks up and adopts any of the 
ideas, trends, or styles popular at the time. 
It does not set or start any of its own. There 
are many people here who shouldn't be; 
they're here for the wrong reasons, or for none 
at all— just to pass the time comfortably or for 
pleasure. Perhaps that's why Tulane is such 
a great follower. Nevertheless, I think you can 
get a fine education here, a very good one 
with lots of effort and an open mind. 
Christopher Lee Kocsis, English & Spanish, 
Mexico City, D.F., Mexico. 
Steven Charles Kramer, cum laude. History, 
Dayton, Ohio. 

Tulane's been up so long it looks like down 
to me. 

Alan Dean Laff, English, Englewood, Colorado. 
A Sunset Brighter: 

The Painter pulled His palette 

And His brush and tubes of pink and blue 

The pigment pink of cotton clouds 

The powder blue of weathered ink. 

Upon the canvas bare of life 

He drew a sunset pale 

The pink itself was not enough 

To give His painting life. 

He threw His canvas to the ground 

And put another in its place. 

A glowing globe He formed of blue 

And yet this, too. 

Was not enough. 

He pondered on for six long days 

And just when he was wont to yield 

This canvas which was His life's quest 

His mind was siezed with painful joy. 

He took the palette from the shelf 

And once again the pink and powder blue. 

Into a sparkling crystal jar 

He emptied both His tubes of oil. 

He stirred them with His marten brush 

And watched the colors 'gin to merge: 

The swirls of blue enclosed in pink 

The pink encased in blue 

The separate colors merged in one 

No longer pink or blue- 
But new. 

More full than ever seen before. 

A nouveau hue 

He used to paint 

A sunset brighter 

Than the true. 

—Denver, August 8, 1970 
David Murrie Leal<e, History, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Edward Francis Le Breton, English, New Or- 
leans. 

Robert Edward Lee, History, Rye, New York. 
Wayne Joseph Lee, Political Science, New 
Orleans. 

Terrence Jude Lestelle, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

Richard Dana Lester, cum laude. Economics, 
Houston, Texas. 

James Shih Kwong Leung, Sociology, Brook- 
lyn, New York. 
Loneliness was first my fate 
it tormented me and wasn't great 
now and then I became a friend 
deeply rooted it was to grown and blend 
alas, what is most to grow is my love for: 

amelicka da bewteefoo, 

bevrteefoo amelickan democlacy, 

plotestan etic, 

me sing too you bullshit, 

look around, 

turn around. 

DO IT. . . . 
Robert Norman Levinson, Spanish, Atlanta, 
Georgia. 

The Vulgar "we"— A thought & poem 
Heads in the sand, feet toward the sky, 
They read the words, meaning unknown 
Stature erect in coat and tie 
Who can guess the winds their hearts have 
blown? 



Sam Laib Levkowicz, Sociology, New Orleans. 
Clifford Jon Levy, Sociology, New Orleans. 
"Society highly values its norman man. It edu- 
cates children to lose themselves and to be- 
come absurd, and thus to be normal . . . We 
are not able even to THINK adequately about 
the behavior that is at the annihilating edge. 
But what we think is less than we know; what 
we know is less than what we love; what we 
love is so much less than what there is. And 
to that precise extent, we are so much less 
than what we are."— R. D. Laing 
Walter Edmond Levy, English, New Orleans. 
Stephen Robert Lewis, Jr., Economics & Polit- 
ical Science, Galveston, Texas. 
William Sproull Lewis, English, Warren, Ohio. 
Ray Theodore LIuzza, English, Arabi, Loui- 
siana. 

Dale Gordon Long, Psychology, Grosse Point, 
Michigan. 

Peter Andrew Lopez, Political Science & Latin 
American Studies, Victoria, Texas. 
Albert Sheley Low, Jr., History, Houston, 
Texas. 

William Barry Mabry, Economics, New Or- 
leans. 
The crowd applaudes for the magnificient 

catch. 
They cheer for a Sayers-like run. 
They watch in awe as giants match 
Their fists in what's more than fun. 

But the hero isn't the quarterback, or halfback, 
Or coach who stands above them all. 
The hero is a pig, without whose skin 
There would be no ball. 
David Toby Magrish, History & Political 
Science, Cincinnati, Ohio. 
John Robert Mahon, History, Miami, Florida. 
Irwin Mandelkern, Political Science, Tallahas- 
see, Florida. 

Robert Louis Marcus, Economics & English, 
Shreveport, Louisiana. 

Mark Francis Marley, English, Bellevue, Wis- 
consin. 

What can I say about a girl who sat on a tuffet? 
Ernest Grover Martin, III, Political Science, 
Gulfport, Mississippi. 

Leon Eugene Martiny, History, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Michael Frederick Marvin, Philosophy, Baton 
Rouge, Louisiana. 

Jon Grant Massey, History, Jackson, Missis- 
sippi. 

John Graham McCarron, Jr., cum laude, Eco- 
nomics, Warrington, Florida. 
Edward Miller McCord, Political Science, Ok- 
lahoma City, Oklahoma. 
Charles Edwin McElwain, History, Washing- 
ton, District of Columbia. 
George Franklin McGowin, Economics, Pine- 
wood, Louisiana. 

Eugene Belton McLeod, Jr., Political Science, 
Pinewood, South Carolina. 
Yesterdays are memories, tomorrow is a dream 
and today is hell. 

John Hall McManus, History, Atlantic Beach, 
Florida. 

Jules Hampton Mercier, Music, Metairie, 
Louisiana. 

John Gammons Merrill, Political Science, 
Washington, District of Columbia. 
Richard Kendrick Mersman, III, English, St. 
Louis, Missouri. 

Michael Powell Minette, Philosophy, Pelham 
Manor, New York. 

Jeflrey Michael Mishkin, English, Mamaron- 
eck. New York. 

William Doyle Mize, Classical Languages, Tu- 
scaloosa, Alabama. 

Stephen Anees Mogabgab, Economics, New 
Orleans. 



Ronald Roy Moore, Political Science, Tripoli, 
Libya. 

Michael Harvey Moskowitz, History, New York, 
New York. 

John Wright Muery, Political Science, New 
Orleans. 

John Joseph Murphy, Jr., Political Science, 
New Orleans. 

Freddie Bernard Negem, Jr., English, Jones- 

boro, Louisiana. 

Andrew Gage Nichols, Political Science, West 

Newbury, Massachusetts. 

Alton Willard Obee, Jr., Political Science, New 

Orleans. 

Wayne Melvin Ondiak, Political Science, New 
York, New York. 

Russell Stuart Palmer, History, Selma, Ala- 
bama. 

Patrick Michael Patterson, Philosophy, Pen- 
sacola, Florida. 

John Hodgeland Pemberton, History, Milwau- 
kee, Wisconsin. 

David Thomas Pence, English, Decatur, Illi- 
nois. 

William Clifton Penick, III, Economics, New 
Orleans. 

Viktor Vaclav Pohorelsky, Economics, Lake 
Charles, Louisiana. 

Edward Butts Poitevent, II, History, Gretna, 
Louisiana. 

Elon Abram Pollack, Sociology, Millburn, New 
Jersey. 

Albert Miles Pratt, III, Economics, New Or- 
leans. 

Robert Ray Punches, History, Natchez, Mis- 
sissippi. 

Daniel Ellis Raskin, Political Science, Savan- 
nah, Georgia. 

Charles Henderson Redmond, II, Sociology, 
Delmar, New York. 

There's too much money in this preppy little 
school. 

Joseph Scott Reeves, History, Nashville, Ten- 
nessee. 

Atwood Lumberd Rice, III, History, New Or- 
leans. 

For what does it profit a man if he getteth a 
Tulane diploma? . . . Can he gain the whole 
world? . . . Shall he loseth his soul? . . . Wist 
ye not, ye shall soon find out— but only God 
knows for sure . . . Tune in and let the Son 
shine. 

Charles Richard, Economics, Flossmoor, Illi- 
nois. 

Never has anything taken so long to obtain! 
James Everett Richardson, Spanish, New Or- 
leans. 

Lamar Merriott Richardson, Jr., Frankllnton, 
Louisiana. 

Robert Louis Rines, Political Science, Bel- 
mont, Massachusetts. 

Bradford Lee Roller, Economics, Beachwood, 
Ohio. 

Richard Steven Rosen, English, Charleston, 
South Carolina. 

Louis James Rovelli, cum laude, Political 
Science, Albany, New York. 
Fernando Sanchez, Jr., History & Latin Ameri- 
can Studies, San Salvador, El Salvador. 
Sam Paul Scelfo, Jr., Economics, New Iberia, 
Louisiana. 

Jay Bayard Schiller, Mathematics, Fort Worth, 
Texas. 

OF A POEM: 

Visit a school every day for four years, 
Take notes in class and copy your friend's 

when you don't go. 
Try hard on tests and keep a high average. 
Then go out and try to make some money. 
(I should of probably of known to major in 

English.) 
Edwin Otto Schlesinger, History, New Orleans. 



PAGE 48 / 



Henry George Schmidt, Jr., Art New Orleans. 

Donald Bolcum Scott, Jr., History, Wauwatosa. 

Wisconsin 

Thomas Charles Senette, History, Franklin. 

Louisiana 

Charles Marshall Sevadjlan, cum laude. An- 
thropology & Biology, Fort Worth, Texas. 
In each of the following sequences, cross out 
the one word or phrase which does not belong: 

1. icecream Dubinsky motion sickness 
drama pointer 

2. height yes Irving/ Ban Antiperspirant/ 
Monk Simons 

3. tripod Eddie Price's/ knot/ how/ burl/ 
it's 

answer: Everything should be crossed out. 

including the directions, the rest of 

this page, and the word shit wherever 

it is encountered. 

Paul Charles Sills, English, New York. New 

York. 

Walter Alan Sommers, Philosophy. Atlanta. 
Georgia. 

Evan Ragland Soule,'Jr,, cum laude. Art His- 
tory, New Orleans. 

"Tis a pity that man remains in a semi-barbaric 
state, ironically clinging to the concept that 
freedom through government is possible. Per- 
haps in some enlightened moment yet to come, 
civilized man will break these mythological 
chains that bind him and realize for the first 
time in his brief history that freedom comes 
only from within.— TanstaafI 
Scott Preston Spector, History, Skokie, Illinois 
Stephen Lee Spomer, History. Cairo, Illinois. 
Louis Jerome Stanley, History, New Orleans. 
Andrew Jay Stillpass, English, Cincinnati, 
Ohio. 

Arthur Wendel Stout, III, History, Houston. 
Texas 

Looking at some of my classmates, I can see 
why many people say Tulane is going down 

\ 

Melvin Vernon Strahan, Political Science & 
Spanish, Bogalusa, Louisiana. 
Douglas Martin Sweet, Anthropology, New 
Orleans 

Louis Edward Tanner, Jr., English, Marathon, 
Florida. 

James Perry Tatum, History, Anderson, Mis- 
souri. 

Dean Edward Taylor, English, New Orleans. 
"My sword I give to him that will succeed 
succeed me in my pilgrimage, and my courage 
and skill to him that can get it. My works and 
scars I carry with me to be a witness for me 
that I have fought his battles who will now be 
my rewarder." (from Pilgrim's Progess) 

O where is John Gait? 
Frank Randolph Tedards, cum laude. Political 
Science, Greenville, South Carolina. 
"Which way do we go from here?" said Alice 
to the Cheshire cat. That depends a good deal 
on where you want to go," said the cat. "Oh, 
that really doesn't matter . . . , " said Alice. 
"Then, it doesn't really matter which way you 
go," said the cat. "As long as I get some- 
where," said Alice, by way of explanation. "Oh, 
you're sure to do that," said the cat. "if only 
you walk far enough."— Carroll, Alice in Won- 
derland 

Richard Eric Teller, Philosophy & Political 
Science, Great Neck, New York. 
Robert Holland Thomas, Political Science, 
Metairie. Louisiana 

Christopher Dickson Thompson, History, 
Houston, Texas. 

James Powers Thompson, Economics, 

Franklin. Tennessee. 

Robert Eugene Thompson, Jr., History. Fort 

Worth, Texas. 

Samuel Berry Thompson, Jr., English. Little 

Rock, Arkansas 

Ronald Stephen Tllley, Political Science, 




Shreveport, Louisiana. 

Max Nathan Tobias, Jr., Political Science. New 
Orleans. 

Steven Alan Tolle, History, Rizal, Philippines. 
Joseph Francis Toomy. 11, Economics, Gretna. 
Louisiana 

William Richard Trant, Sociology. Oak Lawn, 
Illinois. 

Andrew McLean Treichler, History, Wiliams- 
burg, Virginia. 

Richard Gorman Verlander, Jr.. Economics, 
New Orleans 

David Lee Walker, History, Fort Lauderdale, 
Florida 

Robert Harvey Watson, History, De Ridder, 
Louisiana. 

One is necessarily grateful to his Alma Mater 
for her solicitous care. As a son cognizant of 
how hard it is being a mother nowadays, I wish 
her well, wish her better, and the best 
(mother's liberation?). 

Craig Bryon Well, History, Highland Park, Illi- 
nois. 

Robert Cardon Wessler, History, Gultport. 
Mississippi. 



John Albert Williams, Political Science. Mont- 
gomery. Alabama 

Paul Raymond Williams, III. Sociology, Tulsa, 
Oklahoma 

Chris Patrick Winter, Economics, New Or- 
leans 

Robert Allen Wlssner, English, New Orleans 
Keith Douglas Wood, History, New Orleans. 
Charles Randol Harper Wright, Jr., History, 
Nassau. Bahamas 

William Everard Wright, Jr., Economics, New 
Orleans 

Stephen Howard Zagor, Political Science, New 
York. New York 

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE 

Monty Kreiger, summa cum laude with honors 
in Chemistry. New Orleans. 
My thanks to Dr. Aguiar. Dr. Cusachs. and Dr. 
Fritchie for stimulation, many opportunities, 
and all of their encouragement. I am indebted 
to my JYA friends, the kind of people universi- 
ties were meant for. To those who would de- 
stroy the university, this "scheme of barbarous 
philosophy . . is the offspring of cold hearts 



/ PACE 49 




and muddy understandings, and is as void of 
solid wisdom as it is destitute of all taste and 
elegance." "Believe me. sir, all those who try 
to level, never equalize," 

Clyde William McCurdy, Jr., summa cum laude 

with honors in Chemistry, Stone Mountain, 

Georgia. 

William Henry Cummings, ill, magna cum 

laude with honors in Psychology, San Antonio, 

Texas. 

Harris Gregory Etfron, magna cum laude with 
honors in Biology, Great Neck. New York. 
James Henry Fife, magna cum laude with 
honors in Mathematics, Avondale Estates, 
Georgia. 

James Michael Riopelle, magna cum laude 
with honors in Psychology, Covington, Loui- 
siana. 

Marie Benjamin Stoopler, magna cum laude 
with honors in Biology, Great Neck, New York. 
Lehman Kullman Preis, Jr., cum laude with 
honors in Psychology, Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Raymond Clarence Seghers, cum laude with 
honors in Psychology, Jacksonville, Florida. 



I have had a great four years here and I had 
a great time living them. I will always remember 
the antics of freshmen year, the appled door 
of sophomore yeaar, math classes of junior 
year, and norel of senior year. Not to mention 
Mardi Gras of all four years— or at least what 
I remember of them. 

Dennis Ronald Stewart, cum laude with honors 
in Physics, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Alan Marvin Wagner, cum laude with honors 
in Psychology. Cincinnati, Ohio. 
About Tulane— there are times when I doubt 
if I would do it again— there are also times 
when I'm sure I would. 
About the rest— have a peace of it. 
Jeffrey Alan Basen, with honors in Psychology, 
Houston, Texas. 

"If on each occasion instead of referring your 
actions to the end of nature, your turn to some 
other nearer standard when you are making 
a choice or an avoidance, your actions will 
not be consistant with your princi- ■ 
pies."— Epicurus 

Anthony Vincent LaNasa, with honors in Biol- 
ogy. New Orleans. 
As sports afficiando supremo I predict that 



Tulane will be "the" athletic powerhouse of 
the 70's. In addition to starting a football dy- 
nasty, the Wave will establish a regime in 
basketball and monopolies in baseball, track, 
tennis, and swimming. 

Henceforth, the "Harvard of the South" will 
be known as the "Notre Dame of the East 
Bank". 

John Charles Mutziger, with honors in Anthro- 
pology, Natchez. Mississippi. 
Steven Bruce Aclcerman, Biology, Hallandale, 
Florida. 

Stephen Perry Allen, Mathematics, St. Louis, 
Missouri. 

Patrick Joseph Ande, Biology, West Palm 
Beach, Florida. 

Arnold Edward Applebaum, Psychology, Fort 
Worth, Texas. 

John William Audick, cum laude. Psychology, 
Colorado Springs, Colorado. 
Robert Baron Barbor, Biology, Meridian, Mis- 
sissippi. 

Jonathan Scott Barnett, Psychology. Great 
Neck, New York. 

Gregory Emile Bertucci, Biology, New Orleans, 
There were a thousand sensations, tastes, 
loves, hates, joys, disappointments, accom- 
plishments, failures and sleepless nights that 
made up my college experience. As my file 
gets neatly lost among all the others, I can 
recount the lessions that only time could teach 
me: to smile is to breath; to laugh is to grow; 
to love is to live; to dope is to die a little. 
Sidney Joseph Bertucci, cum laude. Chemis- 
try, Metairie, Louisiana. 
Don Edward Blackard, Geology, Baton Rouge, 
Louisiana. 

The Plague agrees: "Whenever you see a 
public building with Gothis fenestration on a 
sturdy backing of Indian concrete, you may 
be certain that it is another university, with 
anywhere from 200 to 20.000 students equally 
ardent about avoiding the disadvantages of 
becoming learned and about gaining the social 
prestige contained in the possession of a B.A. 
degree."— Sinclair Lewis 
Cormell Robert Brooks, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

Roy Leonard Brown, Jr., cum laude. Physics 
& Mathematics, Atlanta, Georgia. 
The purpose of "higher" education is not just 
memorization of facts we didn't learn in high 
school; rather, we came to Tulane to learn 
how to think for ourselves. Thus, we should 
no longer be willing to exist by memorizing 
the formulae of our existence as given by 
others. WE can and must exist by our own 
minds. 

Gordon Ransdell Cain, Psychology, Lake 
Providence, Louisiana. 

Albert Bradford Calhoun, Jr., Psychology, 
Chickasaw, Alabama. 

Edward Fenton Carter, III, Biology, Tampa, 
Florida. 

James Aldon Colvocoresses, Biology, Fairfax, 
Virginia. 

Carl Allan Cozine, Psychology, Fort Myers, 
Florida. 

Bruce Lance Craig, Biology, Syosset. New 
York. 

To be hung up is human, to care about other 
people's hang ups is divifte. 
Alvin Stanley Cullick, cum laude. Chemistry, 
Shreveport, Louisiana. 

Richard Darreli Cunningham, Biology. 
Springfield, Missouri. 

Kenny Dale Davis, Geology. Gulfport, Missis- 
sippi. 

Don Gordon DeCoudres, Psychology, Syla- 
cauga, Alabama. 

Drake Anthony De Grange, Biology, New Or- 
leans. 

James Henry Diaz, Biology, New Orleans. 
David Bruce Dodd, Biology. Metairie, Loui- 



PAGE 50 / 



Glad it's almost over. I feel Tulane is a good 
school, but could be a great schiool Many 
areas need improving (e.g. student-faculty 
relations) Newcomb and Tulane could be bet- 
ter integrated I feel Southern Romanticism Is 
holding the University down and until the Uni- 
versity becomes autonomous, no appreciable 
progress will be made 

AndrewOllverDonelson, Chemistry, Memphis, 
Tennessee 

William George Donnellan, Jr., Chemistry. 
Winter Park, Florida, 

Lawrence Joseph Dries, cum laude. Buccino, 
Louisville, Kentucky, 

Kenneth James Ducote, cum laude. Mathe- 
matics, Metairie, Louisiana. 
While going through four years at Tulane, I 
felt that little was worthwhile. However, upon 
looking back, I see that I have benefitted from 
the curricular and extracurricular offerings. I 
guess the more you put in the more you get 
out 

Randall Clyde Ellzey, Chemistry, Alexandria, 
Louisiana 

David Moniek Fajgenbaum, Chemistry. Trini- 
dad, West Indies. 

Entropy Personified— Tulane students— It was 
great, but thank God its over. 
Erasmus Eugene Feltus, Mathematics, New 
Orleans. 

George d'Artenay Fender, Jr., Chemistry, Gro- 
ton, Connecticut. 

Joe Wedeles FIxel, Psychology, Quincy, 
Florida. 

William Harold Fleming, III, Biology, Dallas, 
Texas. 

Kenneth Charles Fortgang, Mathematics, Nat- 
chez, Mississippi 

Adventure'' Drama'' Comedy? FARCEM 
Richard William Fothe, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

Clay Bruce Frederick, Biology & Chemistry. 
Arlington. Texas. 
"No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant 

to be . . . 
Deferential, glad to be of use. 
Politic, cautious, and meticullous; 
Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse; 
At times, indeed, almost ridiculous— 
Almost, at times, the Fool." 

— Prufrock 
Louis Donell Freeman, Physics. Irving, Texas. 
Joe Lagrange and Bill Hamilton were pretty 
sharp guys, but time integrals are nonetheless 
a pain in the neck. 
Gregory Lloyd Garvin. Biology, Bettendorf, 



Iowa. 

Ted Wayne Gay, cum laude. Psychology, Har- 
vey, Louisiana 

Robert Michael GIngold, Mathematics, Great 
Neck, New York 

Barry Jay Goldsmith, Psychology, Atlanta, 
Georgia. 

William Leroy Goss, Psychology, San Antonio, 
Texas 

Dennis Gerard Gregoire, cum laude. Psychol- 
ogy, New Orleans. 

Howard Alcida Grenier, Biology, New Orleans. 
Walter George Grundy, Anthropology, Okla- 
homa City, Oklahoma. 
Neal N. Haber, Psychology, Miami, Florida. 
Edwfin Clayborn Harris, Biology. Joplin, Mis- 
sissippi 

Michael Oates Harris, Geology, San Juan, 
Costa Rica 

Charles Edward Herlihy, Jr., Biology. Bir- 
mingham. Alabama, 

John Young Hess, Psychology. Massillion. 
Ohio. 

Richard Gene Hibbs, Jr., Biology. New Or- 
leans 

Waters Merrill Hicks, Jr., Psychology. Green- 
wood. Mississippi. 

Robert Scott Howard, Biology. Knoxville, Ten- 
nessee. 

George Eli Howell, II, Biology. Meridian, Mis- 
sissippi- 
Thomas Newman Ireland, Psychology, New 
Orleans. 

Harry Joe, Mathematics, Clarksdale, Missis- 
sippi. 

It's a hell of a long way up only to find yourself 
at the bottom of the ladder again. 
Dennis Kasimian, cum laude. Biology, Indio, 
California. 

Sam Joseph Kayser, III, Psychology, Mobile, 
Alabama, 

Rickey Crawford Kirkpatrick, Chemistry, 
Suger Land. Texas, 

Raymond Lawrence Knecht, Jr., Chemistry. 
Levittown. Pennsylvania, 
James Howard Kravetz, Biology. Dallas, 
Texas. 

Bruce Edward Krell, Mathematics, Hatties- 
burg, Mississippi. 

Stan Joseph Kwiatkowski, Biology, Glynco, 
Georgia. 

Eurgia Charles Land, Biology, Donaldsonville, 
Louisiana. 
Lee Hamilton Latimer, cum laude. Chemistry, 





Dallas. Texas. 

"A man has three faces— the one he shows, 
the one he has. and the one he thinks he 
has "—Old Spanish Proverb The same can 
be said many times over for this university. 
Bruce Fongsie Lee, Biology. Mobile. Alabama. 
As I lay here almost asleep my mind 
At ease, not caring what will happen next. 
My life has not been what I had in mind. 
But I am pleased with life but still perplexed. 
Have I done what is wrong, have I done right? 
Would I have been more pleased if I were 
great? 

Does it mean anything? Because who writes 
About a simple man. who cares his fate? 
No prize, no lame, no glory I have won. 
But happy I have been a simple man. 
No cares, no worries but a lot of fun. 
With good and bad things I have lived hand 

in hand. 
Now wonder if I have lived at all! 
How many lived like me. just lived, that's 

all? 
Dwight Augustus Lee, Biology, Mankato, Min- 
nesota. 

Richard Harris Leichuck, Psychology, Miami. 
Florida. 

Gary Morton Levison, Biology. Nashville. Ten- 
nessee. 

Randolph Gates Lewis, Psychology. Tallahas- 
see Florida 

Eric Donald Lucy, Biology. Metairie. Louisiana. 
Stephen Philip Lukin. Biology. Dallas. Texas. 
Michael H. Lutz. Physics. Canton. Mississippi. 
Michael Lanham Magee, Chemistry & German, 
Blackwell. Texas 

Mark Leonard Marbey. Chemistry. Miami. 
Florida. 

Robert Devers McDonald, Psychology, Salli- 
saw, Oklahoma. 

John Paul McGlynn, Biology, New Shrews- 
bury. New Jersey. 

Leo John McKenna, III, Mathematics, Metairie. 
Louisiana. 

James Robert McNeal, Biology. West Palm 
Beach. Florida. 

Daniel Ward Merdes, Physics, New Orleans. 
Many people are like tugboats; they toot loud- 
est in a fog. 

Hugh Douglas Miller, Chemistry. Fern Park. 
Florida. 

Francis Marion Moore, cum laude. Mathe- 
matics. Metairie, Louisiana. 
Irvin Wilmer Morgan, Jr., Mathematics. New 
Orleans, 

Edward James Moskowitz, cum laude. Biol- 
ogy. Long Island City. New "york. 
Robert Carlton Nail, Biology. Foley. Alabama. 
Walter Edward Norton. Biology, Pineville, 
Louisiana, 

Elliott Ray Novy, Psychology. San Antonio. 
Texas. 

Arthur Franklin Paulina. Jr., cum laude. Math- 
ematics. Lincrott. New Jersey. 
Michael Jackson Pentecost, Mathematics, De 
Funiak Springs. Florida, 
Walter Peter Raarup. III. Biology, Darien. Con- 
necticut, 

Edward Blake Reese, Jr., Mathematics. Elm- 
hurst, Illinois. 

Atwood Lumberd Rice, III. Chemistry. New 
Orleans. 

Lewis Spencer Roach, Psychology. Nashville. 
Tennessee. 

Edward Paul Roberson. Biology. Lafayette, 
Louisiana, 

In case any prospective college student should 
be reading this— 

"If you get a chance to attend Tulane— 
DON'T' 

Eric Mark Rockstroh, Psychology. San An- 
tonio. Texas. 



/ PAGE 31 



Charles Sanford Ruark, Jr., cum laude. Math- 
ematics, Decatur, Alabama. 
Robert Edward Ruderman, c urn laude, Biology, 
Glencoe, Illinois. 

John Bernard Salstone, Biology, Glencoe, 
Illinois. 

Jon Wilkins Searcy, Psychology, Gulf Breeze, 
Florida. 

The only thing I've learned in four years at 
this institution of higher learning is that "there 
are answers". It was fun, but I wouldn't do 
itagain. Gottago now— I think I hear my mother 
calling, or is that Uncle Sam? But I don't wanna 
go! I'm too young . . . 

Jerry Eugene Sims, Biology, Monroe, Loui- 
siana. 

Randlow Smith, Jr., cum laude. Chemistry, 
Houston, Texas. 

Alvin Roy Solomon, Biology, Helena, Ar- 
kansas. 

Donald James Sommers, Chemistry, St. Louis, 
Missouri. 

Leonard Donald Stein, Psychology, Atlanta, 

Georgia. 

David Kirk Stirton, Biology, Houston, Texas. 

Terence Kevin Sullivan, Biology. Los Alamitos, 

California. 

Tulane, you've come a long way; but you're 

not there yet. It's been real. 

Thomas Frederick Van Buskirk, Psychology, 

Shawnee Mission, Kansas. 

Stephen Bernard Webb, III, Biology, New Or- 
leans. 

Richard Louis Weinberg, Biology, New Or- 
leans. 

Ronald Merrill Weiss, Biology, Scarsdale, New 

York. 

Eric Hamilton Worrall, Geology, Norfolk, Vir- 
ginia. 

Matthew LeeZettI, Anthropology, Pepper Pike, 

Ohio. 

Robert James Zurcher, Mathematics, Mercer 

Island, Washington. 



H. SOPHIE NEWCOMB 
MEMORIAL COLLEGE 



BACHELOR OF ARTS 

Katharine Fraser, summa cum laude, with 
Honors in English, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Sharon Leslie Flashman, summa cum laude. 
Psychology, Miami, Florida. 
Sarah Culbertson Scott, summa cum laude, 
Italian, New Orleans. 

Dorothy Carroll Toby, Summa cum laude, 
English, Summit, New Jersey. 
Jo Derrickson Bounds, magna cum laude, with 
honors in Art History, Salisbury, Maryland. 
Diane Burnside, magna cum laude, with 
honors in Sociology, Miami, Florida. 
MaryJaneMcClintock, magna cum /aude, with 
honors in Economics, Baytown, Texas. 
Gayle Louise Monroe, magna cum laude, with 
honors in Theatre, New Orleans. 
Ileana Oroza, magna cum laude, with honors 
in English, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 
Harriet Louise Porzig, magna cum laude, with 
honors in Philosophy, Tavares, Florida. 
Shari Diane Sobel, magna cum laude, with 
honors in Political Science, Muncie, Louisiana. 
Shelley Lee Citron, magna cum laude. Soci- 
ology, Amarillo, Texas. 
Susan Faye Clade, magna cum laude. History, 
New Orleans. 

Shelley Fonda Dorfman, magna cum laude. 
Sociology, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Carol Ann Freeman, magna cum laude, Soci- 
ology, New Orleans. 



Barbara Bolton Hall, magna cum laude. Soci- 
ology, Alexandria, Louisiana. 
Eleanor Conway Riley, magna cum laude. 
Sociology, Savannah, Georgia. 
Cynthia Ann Stevens, magna cum laude, Po- 
litical Science, Scarsdale, New York. 
Katherine Ann Templefon, magna cum laude, 
French, Terre Haute, Indiana. 
Riki Pauline Weinstein, magna cum laude. 
History, Houston, Texas. 
Martha Jane Zimmerman, magna cum laude. 
Political Science, Thibodaux, Louisiana. 
Leia Margaret Blain, cum laude, with honors 
in English, Beaumont, Texas. 
Kathleen Marilynn Ferguson, cum laude, with 
honors in English, Houston, Texas. 
[*see pg. 15] 

Patricia Doran Hanks, cum laude, with honors 
in English, Kaplan, Louisiana. 
Tamra Sindler, cum laude, with honors in Art 
History, New York, New York. 
Cristine Marie Traxler, cum laude, with honors 
in Economics, Baytown, Texas. 
Carol Valentine Coleman, with honors in Psy- 
chology, Melbourne, Australia. 
Nancy Christina Harris, with honors in English, 
Greenwood, Mississippi. 
Saralyn Fran Jacobson, with honors in En- 
glish, Galveston, Texas. 
Jeanne Kinsella Abrams, English, Brighton, 
Massachusetts. 

Regan Anne TullyAlford, English, Washington, 
District of Columbia. 

Maridel Allen, Political Science, Jenks, Okla- 
homa. 

Isabel Phyllis Alper, Psychology, West Palm 
Beach, Florida. 

Carol Anne Antosiak, Philosophy, Brookfield, 
Illinois. 

Joan Arbour, English, New Orleans. 
Linda Faye Aronson, History, Dayton, Ohio. 
Marilyn Ann Asher, Sociology, Bogalusa, 
Louisiana. 

Emay Buchanan Baird, Anthropology, New 
Orleans. 

Janice Lynn Bartley, Speech, New Orleans. 
Meryl Robin Becker, English, Garden City, 
New York. 

Marcia Louise Bennett, English, Largo, 
Florida. 

Nancy Dale Berk, cum laude. Sociology & 

Speech, Miami, Florida. 

Charlotte Robinson Beyer, Political Science, 

New Orleans. 

Deborah Jewel Biber, American Studies, 

Gainesville, Florida. 

Judy Laurance Black, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

Otelia Cristina Bogran, Economics, Teguci- 
galpa, Honduras. 

Catherine DeForest Boudreaux, French, New 

Orleans. 

Bonnie Sue Brody, English, Miami, Florida. 

Carolyn Sue Brown, Sociology, Ada, Okla- 
homa. 

Lillie Helen Brum, Psychology, New Orleans. 

Andrea Inez Bucaro, History, New Orleans. 

Carolyn Holden Burga, English, Metairie, 

Louisiana. 

Gilda Armstrong Butler, Psychology & Soci- 
ology, New Orleans. 

Sarah Jane Cannon, History, Pittsburgh, 

Pennsylvania. 

Marguerite Elizabeth Carrell, cum laude, 

Spanish, Maitland, Florida. 

Sharon Elizabeth Carrigan, English, Pasa- 

dena, Texas. 

Stephanie Ellen Carter, Art History, New Or- 
leans. 
Elizabeth Ann Childress, History, New Or- 



leans. 

Alida Blanche Clark, Political Science, 
Clarksdale, Mississippi. 
Joan Marie Cloninger, English, Beaumont, 
Texas. 

Rina Cohan, English, Miami, Florida. 
Elizabeth Genel Cokinos, English, Beaumont, 
Texas. 

Mary Martha Curd, Psychology, St. Peters- 
burg, Florida. 

Sondra Anita Daum, Sociology, Miami, Florida. 
Mary Gwen Davidson, Art History, Baton 
Rouge, Louisiana. 

Vivian Joan Davila, cum laude, Latin American 
Studies & Political Science, New Orleans. 
Carolyn May Davis, French & Linguistics, 
Montgomery, Alabama. 
Geraldine Suzanne DeLong, Sociology, Dade 
City, Florida. 

Carol Lynn Demuth, Sociology, Metairie, 
Louisiana. 

Sandra Lois Denari, Psychology, Timonium, 
Maryland. 

Judith Zatarain Dinwiddle, Economics, Me- 
tairie, Louisiana. 

Bonnie MacHauer Dyer, English, New Orleans. 
End The War Now 

Donna Jean Dykes, cum laude, Spanish, 
Crockett, Texas. 
Jean Blaise Eagan, American Studies, New 

Orleans. 

Gene Ann Ellis, Sociology, Waco, Texas. 

Beverly Ann English, French, New Orleans. 

Judith Eve Fagin, Art History, New Orleans. 

Marie Dennette Farwell, Geology & History, 

New Orleans. 

Ellen Frances Finley, Spanish, Carthage, Mis- 
souri. 

Loretta Tobe Finn, History, Houston, Texas. 

Loxley Childs Fitzpatrick, English, Jefferson- 

ville, Georgia. 

Lucy Arrington Flack, Art History, New Or- 
leans. 

Mary Frances Fonte, cum laude. History, New 

Orleans. 

Elizabeth Will Fouts, Anthropology, Monroe, 

Louisiana. 

Maxine Fran Frawley, French, New York, New 

York. 

Patricia Friedler, American Studies, New Or- 
leans. 

Sarah Cooper Garvin, cum laude, English, 

New Orleans. 

Kathy Jean Glick, Psychology, Milwaukee, 

Wisconsin. 

Cheryl Evelyn Golasinski, Psychology, New 

Orleans. 

Susan Barbara Goldfaden, cum laude. Soci- 
ology, Houston, Texas. 

Janice Leigh Gonzales, Political Science, Me- 
tairie, Louisiana. 

How doth the little crocodile 
Improve his shining tail, 

And pour the waters of the Nile 
On every golden scale! 

How cheerfully he seems to grin. 

How neatly spread his claws. 
And welcome little fishes in 

With gently smiling jaws. 

—The Crocodile, by Louis Carroll 
Betty Jane Gordon, English, Pittsburgh, Penn- 
sylvania. 

Barbara Anderson Gott, Political Science, 
Lookout Mountain, Tennessee. 
Betty Antoinette Gray, English, New Orleans. 
Ellen Jervey Hanckel, English, Charleston, 
South Carolina. 

Virginia Harris, cum laude. History, Shreve- 
port, Louisiana. 
Sandra Jean Hartley, Political Science, Mem- 



PAGE 52 / 



phis. Tennessee. 

Mariha Elizabeth Hartman, Latin American 
Studies & Spanish. McAllen. Texas. 
Eleanor Clark Hasselle, Psychology, Memphis, 

Tennessee. 

Stephanie Waguespack Haynes, History, New 

Orleans 

Jean Barton Hendrickson, Anthropology, New 

Orleans 

Janet Ellen Heatherwick. History, Shreveport, 

Louisiana 

Rose Marie Horn, cum laude, English, New 

Orleans, 

Patricia Louise Hopkins, Economics, New 

Orleans. 

"Give instruction to a wise man, and he will 

be yet wiser; teach a just man, and he will 

increase in learning."— Proverbs 9:9 

Barbara Lynn Houk, English, Albuquerque, 

New Mexico. 

Janet Louise Hume, Anthropology & History, 

Loraine, Ohio. 

Martha Elizabeth Igert, cum laude. Art History, 

Paducah. Kentucky 

Mary Elizabeth Jackson, Spanish, New Or- 
leans. 

Karen Gall Johnson, French, Tulsa, Okla- 
homa 

Lynne Johnston, Art History, New Orleans. 

Marcia Lee Jordan, History & Latin American 

Studies, Mobile, Alabama. 

B A.'s are made by fools like me. 

But only a maniac would go after a Ph.D. 

Peggy Ann Koven, Spanish, North Miami, 

Florida. 

Catherine Ann Lampard, Anthropology, New 
Orleans. 

Tupper McClure Lampton, Sociology, Colum- 
bia, Mississippi. 

Lucy Ellen Lane, Art History, Jonesboro, Ar- 
kansas. 

Sandra Stream Lawry, Psychology, New Or- 
leans. 

Leslie Ann Lewis, English, Salt Lake City. 
Utah 



Marguerite Crow Lewis, French. Bryan, Texas. 
GeLone DuConge 'Lombard, Sociology, New 

Orleans 

Karen Suzanne Manemann, French. Blloxi, 

Mississippi 

Sandra Kay Mansour, French, Chicago, Illi- 
nois. 

Linda Miriam Mauskopf, English, Portsmouth, 

Virginia 

Mary Anne McAlpin, English, Gulf Breeze, 

Florida. 

Ann Marie McCormick, Sociology, Gulfport, 
Mississippi. 

Ann Prince Merritt, Anthropology, Baton 

Rouge. Louisiana. 

Jill Jacqueline Meyers. Political Science. New 

York, New York. 

Patricia Else Monaco, cum laude. German, 
New Orleans. 

Charlotte Giles Montague, English, Lookout 
Mountain, Tennessee. 

Margo Candace Moret, Sociology, Atlanta, 
Georgia. 

Eileen Dwyer Morris, Sociology, Denver, Co- 
lorado. 

Marcia Geraldine Mortensen, Economics, 

Mobile, Alabama. 

Carol Melinda Moss, Art History, New Orleans, 

Phyllis Anne Murphy, American Studies, New 

Orleans 

Margaret Norman Musser, American Studies. 
New Orleans 

Elaine Elizabeth Noden, History, Largo, 

Florida. 

Mercedes Aline O'Connor, American Studies, 

New Orleans. 

Alice Roberta Oram, Political Science, Atlanta. 
Georgia. 

Susan Polack, French, Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Susan Lee Porter, cum laude. Art History. 
Louisville, Kentucky. 

Jacqueline Rice Pyle, Theatre. Richmond. 
Virginia. 



Pamela Anne Reich, Sociology, Jacksonville, 

Florida 

Ann Leary RInes, English, New Orleans. 

Virginia Anne Riser, Art History, LaPlace, 

Louisiana 

Deborah Ranler Roberts, History. Lake 

Charles, Louisiana 

Kathleen Louise Rogge, History & Political 

Science, New Orleans 

Eleanor Catherine Rose, cum laude. Art His- 
tory. New Orleans 

Anne Wllensky Schneider, English, Miami, 

Florida 

Nancy Jo Schwartz, English. Nashville. Geor- 
gia. 
Shelley Agatha Scott, Spanish. El Paso. Texas. 

Shelley Ann Seaman, Music. Midland. Texas. 
Pamela Jayne Shaw, Anthropology. Pitts- 
burgh, Pennsylvania. 

Donna Shierlock, Psychology. Fort Lauderdale. 

Florida. 

Cynthia Renee Shoss, cum laude. English, 
Cape Giradeau, Missouri. 

Marian Lenore Shostrom, History. River 

Forest, Illinois. 

Donna Frances Sir, History, Fayetteville, Ten- 
nessee. 

Sharman Sue Smith, Psychology, Coral 

Gables, Florida 

Peggy Weil Steine, English, Nashville. Ten- 
nessee. 

Carole Elizabeth Swanay, English, Huntsville, 

Alabama. 

Edith Susan Tabor, cum laude. Anthropology, 

Tylertown, Mississippi. 

Betty Sue Talbot, Philosophy. Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Men must demonstrate the qualities of hu- 
man-ness to other men so that they will feel 
comfortable in their human nature. For in his 
nature is man's power, and in his ineptness 
with it is his downfall. 

Men must be taught to be social beings. This 




/ PACE 53 



is a responsibility of man to man. But— the 
individual as a curious, groping living, excit- 
able, fearing, hoping, artistic, mystical, absurd, 
laughing creature is the most important ele- 
ment in the earthly universe. 
Justine Tally, cum laude, Spanish, Gadsden, 
Alabama. 

Shelby Lowrey Tomlinson, History, Burnt 
Corn, Alabama. 

Laura Anne Turnbull, Art, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
Stephanie Lynn Twilbeck, Anthropology, New 
Orleans. 

Ara Pat Vidos, American Studies, Lake 
Charles, Louisiana. 

Caroline Charlene Vincent, Anthropology, 
Chatsworth, California. 
Joan Dauterive Vinot, English, New Orleans. 
Anna Gwendolyn Wade, cum laude. Political 
Science, El Dorado, Arkansas. 
Susan Wagner, French, Dallas, Texas. 
Sandra Alice Walker, English, New Orleans. 
Deborah Gardner Whalley, History, Tulsa, Ok- 
lahoma. 

Jane Cassandra Wheeler, English, Orlando, 
Florida. 

Newcomb is like New Orleans— interesting and 
different because of its faults— both places are 
unique. I would not have wanted to go to 
school anywhere else. 
Alice Herlihy Wilbert, History, New Orleans. 
Cindy Felice Wile, cum laude, English, Glen- 
coe, Illinois. 

Gwendolyn Baptiste Williams, Sociology, New 
Orleans. 

Linda Cheryl Willis, English, New Orleans. 
Tamara Alicia Winter, English, Plainview, 
Texas. 

Carolyn Shaddock Woosley, cum laude. His- 
tory, Lake Charles, Louisiana. 
Carol Mossy York, French, Houston, Texas. 
Susan Meryl Zelinger, Spanish, Norfolk, Vir- 
ginia. 

[*see pg. 18] 

Constance Ann Zendel, History, Tuckahoe, 
New York. 
Each travels on a path that intersects with 

many others 
But no two ways run parallel for long 
To accept this truth is to accept life itself 
And to deny it is to be hurt at every parting. 
Linda Lee Zisper, English, Tampa, Florida. 

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE 

Lynn Foster Freeman, magna cum laude. 
Mathematics, New Orleans. 
Jacqueline Friedman, magna cum laude. Bi- 
ology, Houston, Texas. 
Mary Edie Meredith, magna cum laude. Math- 
ematics, Biloxi, Mississippi. 
You're twenty or thirty years away from me 
now, Meredith, you ole Hag. Don't go blaming 
me for any of your sorrows, for it's not my 
fault if you don't profit from my mistakes. Don't 
thank me for your joys either, for happiness 
is what you're making, not what you've had 
or will have. 

Deborah Gail Morris, magna cum laude, Biol- 
ogy, Denver, Colorado. 
Rose Marie Smith Strain, magna cum laude. 
Psychology, Coral Gables, Florida. 
Marcia Carol Spiegel, cum laude, with honors 
in Biology, Miami, Florida. 
Peggy Fridstein Gordon, with honors in Psy- 
chology, New Orleans. 
Juanita Marie Weisbach, with honors in Psy- 
chology, Beaumont, Texas. 
Claudette Renee Campbell, Mathematics, 
Tulsa, Oklahoma. 

Dale Marie Dane, Mathematics, New Orleans. 
To Sophie Newcomb I must say 
College was hard, I did play. 



How I made it through, I'll never know. 
But a B.S. in math I have to show. 
Now I wish I could find a job! 
Ann Boylston Farnell, Biology, Houston, 
Texas. 

Elaine Garcia, Psychology, Miami, Florida. 
Barbara Dale Ginsburg, Biology, New Castle, 
Pennsylvania. 

Roberta Susan Gordon, Psychology, Miami, 
Florida. 

Gwendolyn Claire Hager, Psychology, Me- 
tairie, Louisiana. 

Deirdra Carlen Hill, Mathematics, Paoli, 
Pennsylvania. 

Jaclyn Dolton Hoelzer, Biology, New Orleans. 
Nancy Goldstein Hoffman, Psychology, New 
Orleans. 

Rachelle Glenda Iteld, Psychology, Miami, 
Florida. 

Joan Laura Jackson, Biology, New Orleans. 
Margaret Lamb Johnson, cum laude. Biology, 
Alexandria, Virginia. 

Stella Anne Jones, Chemistry, Memphis, Ten- 
nessee. 

May Kay, cum laude. Mathematics, New Or- 
leans. 

Aileen Marie Killgore, Psychology, Covington, 
Louisiana. 

Marion Leigh Malloy, Psychology, Cheraw, 
South Carolina. 

Laurel Lee Malowney, Mathematics, Tulsa, 
Oklahoma. 

Mary Barnes McKinney, Biology, Fort Worth, 
Texas. 

Mona Wilma Morgan, Mathematics, Gretna, 
Louisiana. 

Phyllis Jean Nugent, Psychology, Baytown, 
Texas. 

Muriel Signe Palmgren, Biology, Metairie, 
Louisiana. 

Nancy Ann Nelson Patterson, Biology, Hous- 
ton, Texas. 

Fay Aycock Riddle, cum laude. Mathematics, 
Atlanta, Georgia. 

Elizabeth Anderson Singleton, Psychology, 
Galveston, Texas. 

Trust in yourself above all things; Reality is 
to be found in one's self. 
CarolynRoseStallings, Biology, West Orange, 
New Jersey. 

Diane Lynn Stassi, Biology, New Orleans. 
Susan Marie Stine, cum laude. Biology & Ger- 
man, Miami, Florida. 

Rometta Betti-Jean Thomas, Psychology, New 
Orleans. 

Barbara Kientz Thompson, Biology, New Or- 
leans. 

Fontaine Smith Wells, Mathematics, Montgo- 
mery, Alabama. 

Deidre Paige White, Psychology, Fayette, Ala- 
bama. 

Mildred Caroline Wiener, Psychology, Jack- 
son, Mississippi. 

Margaret Yanus, Biology, New Orleans. 
In the beginning God created the heaven and 
the earth. 

And the earth was without form, and void; and 
darkness was upon the face of the deep. And 
the spirit of God moved upon the face of the 
waters. 

And God said. Let there be light: and there 
was light. 

—Genesis, I, 1-3 

BACHELOR OF FINE ARTS 

Barbara Ann Baer, magna cum laude, with - 
honors in Art, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 
Marilyn O'Quinn Moore, magna cum laude, 
with honors in Art, New Orleans. 
Sallie Claire Lowenstein, magna cum laude, 



Art, Bethesda, Texas. 
Jann Terral Ferris, Art, New Orleans. 
Susan Rhona Flamm, cum laude. Music, At- 
lanta, Georgia. 

"Thoughts on Tulane, a microcosm": 
A mosaic of faces and beings, themes with 
hundreds of variations, the frustration of 
structures, the misdirection of psychic energy, 
love's light lost, intensifications and distortions 
of Living. 

Marjorle Dorothy Fleischer, Art, Akron, Ohio. 
MeredithAnnetteHarper,Art, Columbia, South 
Carolina. 

"If I expire without a name. 
There'll be nobody else to blame. 
I've gotta show them all just what I can do- 
Make them stop hearing my name and asking 

"Who?" 
Haven't you wondered what happens to the 

guys 
Who just lean back and expect the Pulitzer 

Prize? 
Worshipful crowds at their door? 
It's not that way any more!" 
Henrietta Lucy Harwig, cum laude. Music, 
Dallas, Texas. 

Loraine Ann Lockwood, Art History, Briarcliff, 
New York. 

Margaret Joyce Miller, Music, Memphis, Ten- 
nessee. 

Patricia Eldridge Prins, Art, St. Louis, Missouri. 
When I try to sit down and write about Tulane 
or how Tulane has effected me after 3'/2 years 
it only seems to come out sounding like a bad 
epigram. Even in prose I find it very difficult 
to distance myself sufficiently to reflect upon 
my "educational environment" and say what 
I really think about myself in relation to Tulane 
and/or Tulane in relation to myself. What can 
you say about a 21 -year-old girl who just grad- 
uated? 

Gail Anderson Singleton, Art, Galveston, 
Texas. 

One must learn to laugh at oneself. It is the 
secret of all successful men and all happy 
hearts. Life is a continuous learning process 
— laugh — learn — love — lift — be receptive 
to change and ride on. 
Cynthia Anne Wegmann, Art History, New 
Orleans. 

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 



BACHELOR OF ARTS 

Melva H. Adam, Elementary Education, Lafitte, 
Louisiana. 

Reva Lupin Berins, Social Studies, New Or- 
leans. 

Alma Nydia Blasini, Spanish, Gretna, Loui- 
siana. 

Barbara Bouden, English, New Orleans. 
Raymond Neil Calvert, English, New Orleans. 
Amber Williams Chick, English, New Orleans. 
Aletha Marie De Camp, Elementary Education, 
Lafitte, Louisiana. 

Jeremiah Duke, Science, New Orleans. 
Bethany Baker Ewald, History, New Orleans. 
Andree Cecile Gallicher, French, New Or- 
leans. 

Leslie Owen Hayes, English, Lafayette, Loui- 
siana. 

Priscilla Welch Hendren, Social Studies, Me- 
tairie, Louisiana. 

Karen Blomberg Jahncke, Spanish, New Or- 
leans. 

Rebecca Sue Kerlin, English, New Orleans. 
Mays Lawrence Lacour, English, New Orleans. 
Patrick Morrison McCausland, History, New 
Orleans. 

Lester Gerard Oufnac, Social Studies, New 
Orleans. 



PAGE 54 / 



Betty Joyce Russell, English, New Orleans. 
Edward Joseph Schaefer, English. New Or- 
leans 

Arllne Frohling Strelcher, English, Metalrie. 
Louisiana, 
Pierre Michel VIguerle, History. New Orleans. 

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE 

Lucas Joseph Bacino, Jr., Mathematics, Me- 
taine, Louisiana 

Marvin Edward Cooper, Mathematics, Me- 
talrie, Louisiana. 

Mary Carolyn McGehee Hermann, Biology, 
New Orleans, 

Carol Ruth Wendell HIrsch, Psychology, New 
Orleans. 

Dorothy Nyman La Borde, Biology, New Or- 
leans. 

Jose Antonio Ladra, Mathematics. New Or- 
leans. 

Edward Travis Lafferty. Mathematics. New 
Orleans. 

Robert Hale Reardon, Mathematics. New Or- 
leans, 

George Edward Shilllngton, Chemistry, Me- 
talrie, Louisiana. 

BACHELOR OF 
BUSINESS STUDIES 

Carmel Lucy Arthurs, New Orleans. 
Stephen R. Berthelot, Luling, Louisiana 
Henry Frederick Calongne, New Orleans. 
Delia Ann Varn Drohan, Fort Meade, Florida. 
Patrick Michael Jewett, New Orleans 
Frank Ashley Jones, Jr., New Orleans. 
Kurt Lange, Metalrie, Louisiana. 
Lawrence Aymami Macaluso, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

George Newton McAlister, Jr., New Orleans. 
Clarence E. Michel, New Orleans. 
Donald W. Oliver, Slidell, Louisiana. 
Donald John Radovlch, New Orleans. 
Leonard Joseph Schwartz, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

BACHELOR OF 
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 

Linda Joyce Gonzales, New Orleans. 
Cheryl Ann Palmero, New Orleans. 
Virginia Marie Schneldau, New Orleans. 

BACHELOR OF ARTS 

IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION 

Linda Brown Bower, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Bartlett Edward Graves, Marshall. Texas, 
George Joseph Ray, New Orleans. 
Steven Edward Shaw, Houston, Texas. 

SCHOOL OF 
ARCHITECTURE 

BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE 

William Allen Baer, St Louis, Missouri 
Loyas Rudolph Barton, Jr., Clewiston, Florida. 
Jon Bloss Blehar, Dallas. Texas. 
"Tulane is a multi-college university in the 
classic sense, contributing to and benefiting 
from the exciting cultural and intellectual en- 
vironment of its home city. New Orleans. Loui- 
siana, one of the most gracious of cities in 
the United States. "—(Tulane University Bulle- 
tin, 1971-1972) 



James Roger Brown, Jr., Cohasset. Massa- 
chusetts 

Robert Thomas Campbell, New Orleans. 
Michael Joseph Carboni, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Perry Cecil Colield, Jr.. Jacksonville. Florida. 
Wylle Patterson Dawson, Kirkwood. Missouri 
If anything, college has taught me that we 
really don't know what is happening and we're 
all faking like hell to make it look good. 
Manuel Antonio deLemos Zuazaga, Santurce. 
Puerto Rico, 

Robert Allen DeMarco, Schenectady, New 
York. 

Henry Charles Duplantler, Chalmetle, Loui- 
siana. 

Robert Frank Flack, New York. New York. 
Jeffrey Michael Garth, Hicksville, New York 
Lewis Adolphus Graeber, III, Marks, Missis- 
sippi. 

John Carl Hanna, Maplewood, Louisiana, 
Christopher Murry Knight, Short Hills, New 
Jersey. 

It has been a memorable experience and for 
that I am grateful. 

Kenneth Charles Levine, Memphis, Tennes- 
see. 

Bruce George Levy, New Orleans. 
Stephen Thomas Mann, Hempstead. Texas. 
George Roland Miller, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
Grover Ernest Mouton, III, Lafayette. Loui- 
siana. 

Michael David Nius, Louisville, Kentucky 
Robert White Rich, Clarksdale, Mississippi. 
James Carl Salmi, Denver, Colorado. 
Mary du Bols Schaub, Gambrills, Maryland. 
William Maurice Staley, Sherman Oaks, Cali- 
fornia. 

Randolph Figuero von Breymann Acosta, San 
Jose, Costa Rica. 

Ralph Eglin, Wafer, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
. . . it's . . . been a long train ride, but I've 
enjoyed it. Peace and love to everybody. 

Bessie Campbell Wyman, West Point. Missis- 
sippi. 

SCHOOL OF 
ENGINEERING 

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE 
IN ENGINEERING 

Michael Neal Bolton, with honors in Electrical 
Engineering, Houston, Texas. 
David Alfred Castanon, with honors in Elec- 
trical Engineering, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 
Christopher James Church, with honors in 
Engineering Curriculum, Fort Worth, Texas, 
To Dr, Karlem Reiss, Advisor to Fraternities: 
How about initiating a new fraternity for all 
those graduates who: 

1. have received no forms of financial aid 
and have paid their bills promptly for four 
years, 

2. have lived in Tulane dormitories for four 
years. 

3. have eaten Bruff Commons' cooking for 
four years. 

But would I be the only one to qualify? 
Lionel Michael Cobo, with honors in Engi- 
neering Curriculum, Key West, Florida. 
Pearl Mesta Award, 4 

Michael Browning Farnell, with honors in 
Chemical Engineering, Mobile, Alabama. 
Robert Louis Mendow, with honors in Elec- 
trical Engineering. New Orleans. 
David Addison Miles, with honors in Engi- 
neering Curriculum. Orange Park, Florida. 
"There is nothing so stupid as an educated 
man, if you get off the thing he was educated 
in,"— Will Rogers 



Richard Edgar Strain, Jr., with honors in Engi- 
neering Curriculum, New Orleans. 
To my wife Rose Mane Smith Strain— you have 
too many names Smckoo. 
To the ladies in the Dean of Engineering's 
Office, thank you. 

To George Webb, thanks for the advice. 
Samuel Joseph Tilden, with honors in Chemi- 
cal Engineering, New Orleans. 
Matthew Anderson, IV, Civil Engineering, 
Miami. Florida. 

. . . this time we almost made the pieces fit, 

didn't we'' Didn't we 

William Richard Burk, III, Civil Engineering, 
New Orleans 

Joseph Charles Call, Civil Engineering, Me- 
tairie, Louisiana 

Relnaldo Castillo-Vargas, Chemical Engi- 
neering, Palmares, Ala)uela, Costa Rica. 
Ernesto Raul Cespedes, Electrical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans 

Gerald Edward Champagne, Mechanical En- 
gineering, New Orleans 
Will Gibbons Charbonnet, Civil Engineering, 
New Orleans 

Tilden Lafayette Childs, III. Electrical Engi- 
neering. Fort Worth. Texas. 
Cary Stephen Comarda, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. New Orleans 

Richard Charles Dusang, Civil Engineering. 
Chalmette. Louisiana. 

Michael Rhett Engler, Civil Engineering. 
Corpus Christi, Texas 

Lansing Brumley Evans, Electrical Engi- 
neering, Katonah. New York. 
Edwin Mark Evers, Chemical Engineering, 
New Orleans 

Carr Lee Fletcher, Mechanical Engineering, 
Fort Lauderdale. Florida. 
Patrick Cook Flower, Civil Engineering, New 
Orleans, 

David Fontaine. Ill, Chemical Engineering. 
New Orleans 

Antonio Ernesto Friguls-Casas, Civil Engi- 
neering. Rio Piedras. Puerto Rico. 
God grant me the serenity to accept the things 

I cannot change . . , 
Courage to change the things I can . . . 
And wisdomto know the difference. 
Hugh Henry Fuller, III, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, Spanish Fort, Alabama. 
Daniel Paul Garcia, Electrical Engineering. 
Chalmette. Louisiana. 

Robert M. Greene, Engineering Curriculum. 
Lincolnwood, Illinois 

Douglas Reid Grogan. Jr.. Engineering Cur- 
riculum, Irving, Texas, 

Gerald William Hanafy, Civil Engineering. New 
Orleans. 

Michael Francis Hein, Civil Engineering. Arabi. 
Louisiana. 

Stephen James Huffman, Civil Engineering 
(Conferred Posthumously). Kenner. Louisiana. 
Robert Lee Hyman. Engineering Curriculum, 
Mobile. Alabama. 

Wayne Daniel Johnston, Electrical Engi- 
neering. New Orleans. 

Morgan Andrew Jones, Engineering Curricu- 
lum. Abilene. Texas. 

Steven William Kimble, Engineering Curricu- 
lum. Metairie. Louisiana. 
"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the 
shadow of Death. 

I will fear no evil; for I am the evilesi son of 
a bitch in the valley, " Vietnam. C. 1965 
For the Seniors, from an anonymous author: 
"Education is what you have left over when 
you have forgotten everything you have 
learned," Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. I4lh 
Ed. p 1104 b 

Julian Charles Koch, Electrical Engineering, 
Birmingham, Alabama. 



/ PACE 55 



Jimmy Dale Koontz, Engineering Curriculum, 
Hobbs, New Mexico. 

John Walter Krupsky, Electrical Engineering, 
New Orleans. 

Robert Alan Kurlander, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, Beachwood, Ohio. 
John Peter Lalwrde, Civil Engineering, New 
Orleans. 

Waiter Michael Lamia, Engineering Curricu- 
lum, New Orleans. 

". . . and so it ends, not with a bang but with 
a whimper, and a lingering, chaffing doubt- 
now that it's over, have I got what I came to 
seek, or has the search taken on new possi- 
bilities not considered before, so that it is with 
reluctance rather than enthusiasm that I must 
forsake the hunt just when I've gotten a 
glimpse of the White Rabbit's tail? . . . ." 
Thomas Edward Laza, Electrical Engineering, 
Dayton, Texas. 

Steven John Hoa LeBlanc, Civil Engineering, 
New Orleans. 

Daniel Montgomery Lewis, Jr., Engineering 
Curriculum, New Orleans. 
I would like to thank my mother for getting 
her little son into Tulane and also for loving 
me so much. Also, I would like to thank Dean 
Martinez for his kind assistance throughout my 
four years. If it wasn't for him, I probably would 
have ended up at L.S.U.N.O. Finally, I would 
like to thank all the brothers in A.T.O. for four 
wonderful years. 

Theodore William Long, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Michael Brian Maher, Chemical Engineering, 
Basking Ridge, New Jersey. 
Luis Fernando Maldonado, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Paul Joseph Mallon, Chemical Engineering, 
Roselle, New Jersey. 

Hugh Provosty Manson, Engineering Curricu- 
lum, New Orleans. 

Hugh Joseph McClain, Jr., Chemical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

"Universities become such great storehouses 
of knowledge because the freshmen enter with 
so much and the seniors leave with so little." 
William Mossman McCray, Electrical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

John Hilary Morris, Chemical Engineering, 
Butte, Montana. 

John Edward Mueller, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, Prairie Village, Kansas. 
Joel Hersh Penick, Electrical Engineering, 
Miami, Florida. 

An electrical engineering department, which 
fails to give its students a clear view of their 
responsibilities to employers, the environment, 
and themselves and which fails to instill in its 
students basic self confidence, does not de- 
serve to be called an electrical engineering 
school and should be eliminated from the 
Tulane University system. 
David de Jesus Perez-Arrifola, Electrical En- 
gineering, Park Side, Puerto Rico. 
Leon Ronald Pesses, Electrical Engineering, 
New Orleans. 

Maurice Joseph Picheloup, IV, Mechanical 
Engineering, Metairie, Louisiana. 
George Panagiotis Plakotos, Electrical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Thomas Anthony Planchard, Electrical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Dudley Cole Richter, Civil Engineering, Miami, 
Florida. 

Dennis Lee Riddle, Mechanical Engineering, 
Monono, Wisconsin. 

Douglas Rufus Robinson, Engineering Curric- 
ulum, Houston, Texas. 

Roger Weldon Schramm, Engineering Curric- 
ulum, Houston, Texas. 

Christopher Robert Sheridan, Jr., Civil Engi- 
neering, Macon, Georgia. 



Ted Stephen Silver, Engineering Curriculum, 
Miami, Florida. 

Thomas Saunders Smith, Electrical Engi- 
neering, Houston, Texas. 
Carlos Francisco Suarez, Chemical Engi- 
neering, Guayaquil, Ecuador. 
I believe I have received very much from Tu- 
lane in only two years: A B.S. and a wife. 
Philip Charles Sutherling, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, Norfolk, Virginia. 
Steven Richard Szymurski, Mechanical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Thomas William Twiford, Jr., Mechanical En- 
gineering, Houston, Texas. 
Tulane, home of the Wave, Hullabaloo, Free 
flick. Jamb, Herbie, Bruff, C. R., Rat, Cafeteria, 
Scruton, Eddie's, Whopper, Yuk, Mushroom. 
SOS, DSD (?), Yats, Quarter, Dixie, Newcomb 
lovelies, and all other pleasantries of N.O. 
What more could one ask? 
Stephen James Walton, Civil Engineering, 
Metairie, Louisiana. 

Victor Martin Walz, Jr., Electrical Engineering, 
Merritt Island, Florida. 

Richard Brooke Wavell, Engineering Curricu- 
lum, Winter Park, Florida. 
Douglass John Williams, Civil Engineering, 
Eustis, Florida. 

If you don't know how to lose you don't deserve 
to win. 

Jimmy Allen Yarter, Mechanical Engineering, 
Bellaire, Texas. 

An old Indian once said— When a man's heart 
is on fire, sparks fly out of his mouth— GO TO 
HELL LSU. 

MASTER OF ENGINEERING 

Carl Frederick Will, Mechanical Engineering, 
New Orleans. 

MASTER OF 
OPERATIONS RESEARCH 

Dan Spence Grimes, Winchester, Indiana. 
Cornelius Cole Holcomb, Jr., New Orleans. 

THE GRADUATE 

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS 
ADMINISTRATION 



MASTER OF 

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

James William Armbruster, Cleveland, Ohio. 
Michael Henry Barnes, Oklahoma City, Okla- 
homa. 

Stephen Anthony Brinkman, Tyler, Texas. 
Jerome Thomas Broussard, St. Martinville, 
Louisiana. 

Glenn Philip Carson, LaJunta, Colorado. 
John Martin Caldwell, St. Louis, Missouri. 
Charles Burton Clark, Anniston, Alabama. 
Louis Holt Cloud, Birmingham, Alabama. 
Joseph Christian Conrad, Fairfax, Virginia. 

Charles Reems Daul, Convent Station, New 
Jersey. 

Jean-Pierre de Cormis, Paris, france. 
Ralph Francis Felder, Beaumont, Texas. 
Michael Ferman, St. Louis, Missouri. 
Dennis Don Rint, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 
John Roderick Flint, Richmond, Virginia. 
Merle Freitag, Huron, South Dakota. 
George Nunzio Giacoppe, Fitchburg, Massa- 
chusetts. 

Eugene Albert Grasser, Jr., New Orleans. 
Forrest Virgil Graves, Garden Grove, Califor- 
nia. 



Noel Delmas Gregg, Butler, Tennessee. 
Jack Henry Griffith, Jr., San Antonio, Texas. 
Dan Spence Grimes, Winchester, Indiana. 
Howard Hamilton Hampton, II, Lakewood, Co- 
lorado. 

Eugene Harrison, Springfield, Mis- 



Kent Hartman, Lancaster, Pennsyl- 

South 



Willard 

souri. 

Jeffrey 

vania. 

George Philip Higdon, Jr., Charleston, 
Carolina. 

Oliver Armstrong Hord, Jr., Hattiesburg, Mis- 
sissippi. 

John Clinton House, Robersonville, North 
Carolina. 

Leamon Eugene Howell, Live Oak, Florida. 
William McCaw Hughes, Jr., Morgantown, 
West Virginia. 

Johnnie Morgan Jackson, Jr., Hampton, Vir- 
ginia. 

Allen Corson Jaggard, Pitman, New Jersey. 
James Franklin Jancik, Caldwell, Texas. 
Jerry Wayne Johnston, Hopkinsville, Ken- 
tucky. 

Owen Lambert Jones, Jr., New Orleans. 
William Adrian Jones, Los Angeles, California. 
Peter David Kanwit, Fairfax, Virginia. 
August Leander Keyes, Torrington, Wyoming. 
William Leonard Klinkenstein, Miami, Florida. 
Edward Murphy Knoff, Jr., Memphis, Tennes- 
see. 

Julio Rot>erto Lago, New Orleans. 
Bruce Thomas Lammers, Baxter Springs, 
Kansas. 

Robert Marion Leaman, New Orleans. 
Albert Regis Lepage, Auburn, Maine. 
Charles Michael Levy, New Orleans. 

Leonard Thomas Lilliston, Jr., Onancock, Vir- 
ginia. 

Paul Francis Livaudais, Metairie, Louisiana. 
David James Manifold, Leiand, Mississippi. 
James Paul Martinek, Lyons, Illinois. 
Michael Josef Matt, Klagenfurt, Austria. 
George Arthur McCammon, Jr., Springfield, 
Illinois. 

Russell Francis Moon, New Orleans. 
James Marshal Moorehead, New Orleans. 
Gerard Morales, Miami, Florida. 
James Francis Mullen, Quincy, Massachu- 
setts. 

Nihat A. Ozan, Istanbul, Turkey. 
Adelma Lucy Park, Nyack, New York. 
Melvin Claude Payne, Jr., Newton, Mississippi. 
James Marvin Peoples, Jacksonville, Florida. 
Jose Manuel de Olim Perestrelo, Niteroi, Bra- 
zil. 

Walter Leo Perry, Salem, New Hampshire. 
Clement Francis Perschall, Jr., New Orleans. 
Nancy Bailey Pinson, Greensboro, North 
Carolina. 

John Leo Rafferty, Scranton, Pennsylvania. 
Charles Francis Bradford Reynolds, Fort 
Smith, Arkansas. 

Jackson Stephens Robbins, Birmingham, 
Alabama. 

Charles Howard Roeder, New Ulm, Minnesota. 
Jorge Alberto Sarria, Harahan, Louisiana. 
Jorge Alberto Sarria, Bogota, Columbia. 
Melvin Edward Schick, Jr., Elgin, Illinois. 
Richard Lawrence Simmons, Wyoming, Ohio. 
Earnest David Simshauser, Slidell, Louisiana. 
William Edward Snell, Jr., Vineland, New Jer- 
sey. 

John Elbert Stack, III, Meridian, Mississippi. 
Joanne Ruth Sterbenz, New Orleans. 
Dexter Stevens, III, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. 



PAGE 56 / 



David Cameron Tatom, Dothan, Alabama. 
Gerardo ten Brink, Houston, Texas. 
Tommy Lee Trumbie, III, Lumberton. Missis- 
sippi, 

Kenard Newton Turpin, Hi, Miami, Florida. 
Donald Hugh Tyler, Watonga, Oklahoma. 
Jay Eldon Vaughn, Maryville. Oregon. 
Gerald Pini<ham Ward, Oil City, Pennsylvania. 
William Howard Willoughby, Jr., Ventura. Ca- 
lifornia. 

Wayne Joseph Wilson, New Orleans 
Marc Georges Zavadil, Geneva. Switzerland 
Robert William Zllle, Jr., New Orleans. 

THE SCHOOL OF LAW 

JURIS DOCTOR 

Hertjert Roman Alexander, Jr., New Iberia, 
Louisiana. 

William Travis Allison, New Orleans. 
Harry Stiles Anderson, Clarksdale, Mississippi. 
Wolfgang Paul Andersson, New Orleans 
Alvin Lee Andrews, Davison, Michigan. 
Alexander Raymond Ashy, II, Eunice, Loui- 
siana. 

Philip Leslie Azar, Jr., Belleville. Illinois. 
Denis Gerard Bandera, New Orleans. 
Thomas Barr, IV, New Orleans 
Keith Edward Bell, Sharon, Pennsylvania. 
Leonard Marty Berins, New York, New York 
Henry Bernstein, New Orleans. 
Ronald Joseph Bertrand, Lake Charles, Loui- 
siana. 

Jacques Francois Bezou, New Orleans. 
Ricardo Antonio Bilonici<-Paredes, Panama, 
Republic Of Panama. 

Frederick Alexander Blanche, III, Baton 
Rouge. Louisiana. 

Harold Martin Block, Thibodaux, Louisiana. 
Jerald Paul Block, Thibodaux, Louisiana. 
Alan Bart Bookman, New Orleans. 
Gerald Arthur Bosworth, Thibodaux, Loui- 
siana. 

Leonard Nicholas Bouzon, Metal rie, Loui- 
siana. 

John Jacob Broders, New Orleans. 
William Edward Brown, Rochester, New York 
Robert Reisch Casey, New Orleans 
Edward Joseph Castaing, Jr., New Orleans. 



Hugh Erskine Cherry, Anderson. Indiana. 
Richard Kearney Christovich, New Orleans. 
Rutledge Carter Clement, Jr., Danville, Vir- 
ginia 

Timothy Kimball Cloudman, New Orleans. 
David Alfred Combe, New Orleans. 
Michael Duson Cossey, New Orleans. 
Ronald David Cox, Napoleonville, Louisiana. 
David Frederick Craig, Jr., New Orleans. 
George Paull Crounse, Jr., Paducah, Ken- 
tucky. 

William Bertram DeMars, Jr., Casper, Wyom- 
ing. 

John Michael Devlin, Houston, Texas. 
Dee Dodson Drell, New Orleans 
Michael Thomas Ellas, Laurel. Mississippi. 
Peter Everett, iV, New Orleans. 
James Panfield Farwell, New Orleans. 
Grey Flowers Ferris, Vicksburg. Mississippi. 
Michael Kevin Rtzpatrick, New Orleans. 
Rueben Isidore Friedman, New Orleans. 
Anita Hamann Ganucheau, New Orleans. 
David Norman Gillis, Fayette. Mississippi. 
Edith Rhodes Gomes, New Orleans. 
Joseph Bailey Grant, Monroe, Louisiana. 
Robert Morris Green, New Orleans. 
John Clifford Grout, Jr., New Orleans. 

Charles Carr Grubb, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Charles Byron Hahn, Jr., North Augusta, South 
Carolina. 

Harry Simms Hardin, III, New Orleans. 
Benjamin Franklin Hatfield, Indianapolis, In- 
diana. 
James Alison Hayes, Lafayette, Louisiana. 

Robert Matlock Hearing, Jr., Jackson, Missis- 
sippi. 

Joseph Harrison Henderson, III, Alexandria, 

Louisiana. 

John Sharp Holmes, Jr., Yazoo City, Missis- 
sippi. 

Michael Lawrence Hughes, Grand island, 
Florida. 

Henry Joseph Jumonville, III, New Orleans. 
James George Kambur, New Orleans. 
Peter Crump Keenan, New Orleans. 
David Arthur Kerstein, Eunice. Louisiana. 
Harold Beryl Kushner, Montgomery, Alabama. 
John Luther Landrem, Jr., Shreveport, Loui- 
siana, 
Charles Eustace Leche, New Orleans. 



Robert Allen Lee, Metairie, Louisiana. 
Sergio Alfredo Leiseca, Jr., Bethesda, Mary- 
land 

Joel Phillip Loeffelholz, New Orleans. 
Geoffrey Herr Longenecker, New Orleans. 
Robert Murray Mahony, Chappaqua, New 
York 

John Poston Manard, Jr., New Orleans. 
David Anthony Marceilo, Thibodaux. Loui- 
siana. 

Ira Jeffrey Marcus, Chicago. Illinois. 
Louis Herman Marrero, IV, New Orleans. 
Jon Grant Massey, Jackson. Mississippi. 
Earl Raymond McCallon, III, Metairie. Loui- 
siana. 

Edward Joseph McCloskey, New Orleans. 
Kenneth Edward Meyer, Shaker Heights, Ohio. 
Malcolm Andrew Meyer, New Orleans. 
Philip Montelepre, New Orleans. 
Brainerd Spencer Montgomery, Jr., New Or- 
leans. 

Wllbert Evans Noel, New Orleans. 
David Oestrelcher, II, Salisbury. North Caro- 
lina. 

Michael Roy O'Keefe, ill. New Orleans 
Chester Allen Parker, III, Orlando, Florida 
Joseph Leon Parkinson, Blackfoot. Idaho. 
Lyie Franklin Parratt, Jr., Metairie, Louisiana, 
Lyie Robert Phillpson, New Orleans 
Donald Joseph PIckney, New Orleans. 
Johnny Atton Polndexter, Houston. Texas. 
Ronald Gordon Poquette, Eau Claire. Wiscon- 
sin. 

Lionel Franklin Price, Slidell. Louisiana. 
Wallace Clarke Quinn, New Orleans. 
Clayton Gethin Ramsey, Monticello. Georgia 
Tulane? ... Gaveaf emptor. 
AI>bott Jay Reeves, Providence. Rhode Island. 
Margaret Maraist RItchey, Morgan City. Loui- 
siana. 

James Henry Ross, Jr., Burlington, North 
Carolina. 

Edwin Otto Schiesinger, New Orleans. 
John Garic Schoen, Jr., New Orleans. 
Philipp Albert Seelig, New Orleans. 
Stephen Bennett Sharber, Mayfield. Kentucky. 
Patrick Roy Sheldon, Huntsville. Alabama 
Donald Alan Shindler, New Orleans 
Irving Bernard Shnalder, New Orleans 
Stephen Gerard Sklamba, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Diane Wllp Spies, Mandeville. Louisiana. 



*i«ii« 




/ PAGE 57 



John Stephen Steiner, University City, Mis- 
souri. 

Helen Ludeweka Sullivan, Shreveport, Loui- 
siana. 

Judy Nicholas Tabb, New Orleans. 

Walter Chlllingworth Thompson, Jr., Harahan, 

Louisiana. 

Max N. Tobias, Jr., New Orleans. 

Louis Bartholomew Trenchard, III, New Or- 
leans. 

Robert Collins Vallee, New Orleans. 
Jeffrey Paul Victory, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Ralph Shirley Whalen, Jr., Lake Charles, Loui- 
siana. 

James Logan Wheeler, New Orleans. 
William Hobart White, Jr., Terre Haute, In- 
diana. 

John Courtney Wilson, Metairle, Louisiana. 
■Michael Philip Wolfson, New Orleans. 

MASTER OF CIVIL LAW 

Horacio Fernando Alfaro Arosemena, Pan- 
ama, Republic of Panama. 



MASTER OF LAWS 

Tran Huu Dinh, Saigon, Vietnam. 
Francois Jouvel, Marseille, France. 
Sanguan Lewmanomont, Bangkok, Thailand. 
Francolse Peccoud, Chambery, France. 
Henricus Johannes Maria van Bronkhurst, 
Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 



SCHOOL OF MEDICINE 

DOCTOR OF MEDICINE 
WITH HONORS 

Richard Thomas Anderson, New Orleans. 
Thomas Brandt Anderson, Moorhead, Min- 
nesota. 

Isaac William Browder, New York, New York. 
Ronald Wilfred Busuttil, Temple Terrace, 
Florida. 

Clifford Loren Coleman, New Orleans. 
Robert Joseph Kaminski, Lafayette, Louisiana. 
Glenn Earl Lambert, Jr., New Orleans. 
Douglass Mann Landwehr, New Orleans. 
Robert Alan Lipson, North Miami Beach, 
Florida. 

Jack Colbert Morgan, III, Stratford, Texas. 
Arthur Joseph Nussbaum, Alison Parks, 
Pennsylvania. 

William Ellis O'Mara, Jackson, Mississippi. 
DOCTOR OF MEDICINE 

John Frazier Alston, Cedarburg, Wisconsin. 

Roger Michael Anastasio, Hamden, Connec- 
ticut. 

Charles Russell Anderson, Denver, Colorado. 

Winston L. Anderson, Jr., Winchester, Kansas. 

Laurence Warren Arend, Austin, Texas. 

Hendrick Jackson Arnold, III, Arkadelphia, 
Arkansas. 

Ronald Neel Barbie, St. Peters, Missouri. 
Stephen Phillips Binns, Sarasota, Florida. 
Jerome Scott Blackman, Roslyn, New York. 
Phyllis Suzanne Wiggers Blackwell, Dubach, 
Louisiana. 

Steven Jeffrey Blackwell, New York, New 
York. 

David Warren Bonham, Enid, Oklahoma. 



James Stewart Bonnet, Jr., Lafayette, Loui- 
siana. 

Archie Watt Brown, Jr., Morgantown, North 
Carolina. 

Sherman Ira Brown, Van Nuys, California. 
George Evans Burgess, III, New Orleans. 
Harry Joseph Cazzola, Albuquerque, New 
Mexico. 

Joseph Alan Chipella, Chico, California. 
George Jenhua Chu, Hong Kong. 
Dellie Howard Clark, Jr., Rosefield, Louisiana. 
Stephen Riley Cochran, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
Gloria Battle Coker, Metairle, Louisiana. 
Kenneth Lee Combs, Lexington, Kentucky. 
John Charles Curtiss, Port Arthur, Texas. 
Gary Jude Danos, Metairle, Louisiana. 
Rise Delmar, New York, New York. 
Dalton Evan Diamond, Sardis, Mississippi. 
Jon Hope Edwards, San Angelo, Texas. 
David Martin Elwonger, Victoria, Texas. 
Today is the first day of the rest of my lite. 
Gary Robert Epier, Bozeman, Montana. 
Reavis Thayer Eubanks, Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Richard Arthur Evans, Houston, Texas. 
Michael Charles Finn, Washington, District of 
Columbia. 

Jack Fleet, Jacksonville, Florida. 
Barry Dean Frame, Nashville, Tennessee. 
Jan Marshall Friedman, Alton, Illinois. 
Marc Phillip Friedman, Metairle, Louisiana. 
Gail Marie Fuller, Salem, Oregon. 
Lawrence Jay Galinkin, Flushing, New York. 
Michael Lawrence Galligan, Canton, Minne- 
sota. 

Peter Michael Goldman, West Orange, New 
Jersey. 

Miles Jay Graber, New York, New York. 
Sandra Shroder Graber, New Orleans. 
Jay Frederick Grimaldi, Citrus Heights, Cali- 
fornia. 

Charles George Haddad, Metairle, Louisiana. 
Richard Allen Hall, Jeffersonville, Illinois. 
Charles Robinson Hanes, III, Mobile. Alabama. 
George Marion Harris, Jr., Laurel, Mississippi. 
William Wallace Helvie, Caracas, Venezuela. 
Jeremiah Henry Holleman, Jr., Columbus, 
Mississippi. 

James David Hooker, Hobbs, New Mexico. 
Randolph Michael Howes, Ponchatoula, Loui- 
siana. 

Walter Simeon James, III, Moultrie, Georgia. 
John Blassingame Johnston, St. George, 
South Carolina. 

John Marcus Jones, Houston, Texas. 
Gerald Feitel Joseph, Jr., Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Alan Scott Kellermann, New Orleans. 
James Driscoll Knoepp, Alexandria, Loui- 
siana. 

Conrad Krebs, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 
Iris Marie Krupp, New Orleans. 
Ivri Matthew Kumin, Shreveport, Louisiana. 
Wayne Fox Larrabee, Jr., Omaha, Nebraska. 
Charles John Lilly, Jr., New Orleans. 
Charles Gordon Long, Tallahassee, Florida. 
Alfred Carl Lotman, Short Hills, New Jersey. 
Donald Clifton Luebke, New Orleans. 
Arthur Morris Matthews, Jr., Gulfport, Missis- 
sippi. 

Richard Herman May, San Antonio, Texas . 

John Scott McCabe, Ellensburg, Washington. 

Thomas Caryle McLure, III, Alexandria, Loui- 
siana. 

James Thomas McQuitty, Jr., New Orleans. 



Jay Leonard Merten, Monroe, Louisiana. 
Floyd Paul Meyer, Jr., Elmgrove, Wisconsin. 
Bruce Paul Meyers, Bloomfield, Iowa. 
Michael Rex Moore, West Plains, Missouri. 
Theodore Albertus Moore, III, Minden, Loui- 
siana. 

James Andrew Morock, Alexandria, Louisiana. 
Harold Roland Neely, Albuquerque, New Me- 
xico. 

Dale Edward Nickel, Shatter, California. 
Peter Gregers Nielsen, Bakersfield, California. 
James Wright Northington, Florence, Ala- 
bama. 

Daonald Nathan Novick, Akron, Ohio. 
Raymond Latanae Parker, Jr., Miami, Florida. 
I would like to thank all those who have helped 
me during these past four years, especially 
my close friends. I hope now that from this 
the beginning of my medical career to the end 
I will remain dedicated to the betterment of 
my fellow man. 

Michael Joseph Raybeck, Danbury, Connec- 
ticut. 

John Edward Rea, III, Norman, Oklahoma. 
Joseph John Roniger, Jr., New Orleans. 
Robert Edward Roybal, Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

James George Sallfield, Toledo, Ohio. 
Randolph Cochrane Seybold, Houston, Texas. 
Robert Harris Shaw, Houston, Texas. 
James Mason Shelley, Jr., Pensacola, Florida. 
Howel William Slaughter, Jr., Mobile, Ala- 
bama. 

James Reilly Smith, Houston, Texas. 
Joseph David Sosnow, Freeport, New York. 
Andrea Lynn Starrett, East Point, Georgia. 
Henry George Stelling, Jr., Atlanta, Georgia. 
Tommy Ernest Swate, Cotton Valley, Loui- 
siana. 

Laurence Ken Tanaka, Bonita, California. 
Thaddeus Lamar Teaford, Americus, Georgia. 
"Coo Coo and Twitty" April 17, 1971; A Fan- 
tastic Happening and the Beginning of a Won- 
derful Experience. 

William Horace Thompson, Jr., West Co- 
lumbus, South Carolina. 
Paul Andrew Tibbits, New Orleans. 
Awaken early, 
To lengthen life's day. 

Timothy Junius Triche, Dearborn, Michigan. 
Lawrence Dashiell True, Washington, District 
of Columbia. 

Jeffery James Tucker, Houston, Texas. 
John Schuyler Van Bodegem, Portland, Ore- 
gon. 

Max Frederick Van Gilder, Paris, Illinois. 
William Michael Walsh, Decatur, Georgia. 
Richard Edward Ward, New Orleans. 
Thomas Oliver Wildes, Rice Lake, Wisconsin. 
David Lindsey Wolf, Tyler, Texas. 
John Arthur Youngberg, Concord, California. 



SCHOOL OF 
PUBLIC HEALTH AND 
TROPICAL MEDICINE 

MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH 



James Harold Ammons, Montgomery, Ala- 
bama. 

Richard Ralph Ashbaugh, New Orleans. 
Richard Paul Brown, Gretna, Louisiana. 
Joseph Donaldson Buck, New Orleans. 



PAGE 58 / 



Daisy Greenwood Campbell, Metairie, Loui- 
siana 

Stuart Alan Capper, Silver Spring, Maryland 
Robert Paul Caudlll, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee 
Bundit Ctiunhaswasdikul, Bangkok, Thailand. 
William Stephen Collins, Devon, Connecticut 
RadclKfe John Coyle, Giendale, California. 
John Emanuel Cutts, Mobile, Alabama. 
Anne Mae Doran, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 
Therese Luclta Paget, New Orleans. 
Beverly Bernadetle Fasulio, New Orleans. 
Carole Nancy Furman, Miami, Florida. 
Walter Daniel Galanowsky, Clifton, New Jer- 
sey. 

Bachtlar GIntIng, Bindjai. Sumatera, Indone- 
sia. 

Nydia Helena Gordillo-Gomez, Cordoba, Ar- 
gentina. 

Judy Willis Gulllory, New Orleans 
Dan Edward Hammack, Hemet, California. 
Barbara Parrlsh Hanks, Metairie, Louisiana. 
Stalin Hardin, Sarawak, East Malaysia. 
John Allen Harrel, Jr., Little Rock, Arkansas. 
Ella Mae Herriage, Lubbock, Texas. 
Bui The Hoanh, Thi Nghe. Saigon, Vietnam. 
Philip Webb Laird, Jackson, Mississippi. 
James Anthony Lobo, Maharasthra, India. 
Margaret Anne Neveux, New Orleans 

George Wesley Newburn, Jr., Mobile, Ala- 
bama. 

Thassanee Pornpiboon Nuchprayoon, Bang- 
kok, Thailand. 

Uton Mughtar Rafel, Bandung, Thailand. 
George Lawrence SandKer, Columbia, South 
Carolina. 

Vernon Donald Selfert, New Orleans. 
Sue Ann Boynton Servoss, Lincolnwood, Illi- 
nois. 

Edgar Haviland Sllvey, Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Sanguan Sirinam, Songkhla, Thailand 
Dolores Vergeau Smiley, St. Louis, Missouri. 
Joe Purser Smith, Jr., Fort Worth, Texas. 
David Edgar Stewart, New Orleans. 
Robert Fulton Stott, New Orleans. 
Duong Trong Thieu, Saigon, Vietnam. 
Florence M. Washington, New Orleans. 
Adin Richard Webb, Concordia, Kansas. 
Theodore Jay Weinberg, Springfield, Massa- 
chusetts. 

Peggy Louise Wheeler, Rock Glen, New York. 
Joyce Otford Wildes, Rice Lake, Wisconsin. 
Marc Jay Yacht, Norristown, Pennsylvania. 



MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH 
AND TROPICAL MEDICINE 

Helen F. Berquist, Youngstown, Ohio. 
Wilfred Sei Boayue, Bunadee. Liberia. 
Phaira) Desudchit, Bangkok, Thailand. 
Jagjeet Singh Gill, Kuala Lumpur, West Ma- 
laysia. 

Louis Fitzhenry James, Salt Lake City, Utah 
Donald Carter Kaminsky, Las Vegas, Nevada. 
Eliot Jacobs Peariman, Brookline, Massachu- 
setts. 

Somnuek Polcharoen, Bruket, Thailand. 
Sarnt Sarntlnoranont, Utaradit, Thailand. 
Rupert Kurt Splllmann, New Orleans 
Sri Srinophakun, Nonthaburi, Thailand. 
Kanchana Supanthuvanlch, Bangkok, Thai- 
land. 

Somchai Supanvanlch, Bangkok, Thailand 
Cherdiarp Vasuvat, Bangkok, Thailand 



MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE 

Holmes Byron Bryant, New Orleans. 
James Edwin Burnham, Port Neches, Texas. 
John DadlanI, Arlington, Virginia. 
John Michael D'AntonI, New Orleans. 
Earl Stanley Dobbs, New Orleans 
Dennis Ralph GalatI, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 
Marilyn Esther Goodrich, Milledgeville, Geor- 
gia. 

Erna Hotmann HoHman, New Orleans. 
Elster Joseph Laborde. Metairie, Louisiana. 
Wayne Fox Larrabee, Jr., Omaha, Nebraska. 
Mahmud Majanovic, Milledgeville, Georgia. 
Eanix Poole, Grand Ridge, Florida. 
Benjamin Martin Potier, Thibodaux, Louisiana. 
Warren Caudlll Shumate, Tallahassee, Florida. 
Emmanuel Ademola Smith, Suru Lere, Nigeria. 
Peter Matthew Smith, Anchorage. Alaska. 

DOCTOR OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE 
Theodore Vance Crosiey, New Orleans. 

SCHOOL OF 
SOCIAL WORK 

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK 

Saul Joseph Addison, Hammond, Louisiana. 
Jane Hannon Adkinson, Gainesville, Florida. 
Linda Jean Agrlmson, San Francisco, Califor- 
nia. 

Kay Ann Appieman, Fort Worth, Texas. 
Linda Eilzalieth Beckett, San Angelo, Texas. 
Harry Peter Becnei, Jr., Baton Rouge, Loui- 
siana. 

Charles William Belsom, New Orleans. 
Titus William Bender, Meridian, Mississippi. 
Napoleon O. Benoit, New Orleans. 
Maureen Heaiy Benson, Hampton, Virginia. 

Bettye Gardner Bohannon, Arabi, Louisiana. 

Sandra Ruth Bonner, Moultrie, Georgia. 

James Carl Brandt, Denver, Colorado. 

Josephine Schumacher Brown, Aberdeen, 

South Dakota. 

Susannah Simonis Brown, Saratoga, Califor- 
nia. 

Marta Rodriguez Carboneil, New Orleans 

Carolyn Pullin Carpenter, Paris, Texas 

Niels Kurt Christiansen, Rochester, New York. 

Mary Constance Christopher, San Antonio, 

Texas 

DeElda Lou Cotanche, Panama City, Florida. 

Martha Lee Coulter, Lafayette, Louisiana. 

Claire Lee Courtney, Hammond, Louisiana. 

Andrea Ayo Cox, New Orleans 

Jean FIke Craig, Atlanta, Georgia. 

Elaine Cunningham, New Orleans. 

Dorothy Ann Day, Gretna, Louisiana. 

George Robert Day, Tahlequah, Oklahoma. 

Elolse Doxle Dixon, New Orleans. 

Delbert Michael Dorn, New Orleans. 

John David Du Pre,' Marietta, Georgia. 

Joseph Donald Edwards, Jr., Orwigsburg, 

Pennsylvania. 

Priscllia Rivera de Engolla, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Frances ElizalDeth Evans, Fort Worth, Texas. 

Curtis Henry Fiesel, Oregon City. Oregon. 

Theodore Arthur Foster, Kenner, Louisiana. 

Donald Ray Frederick, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 

Diana Marie Freeland, Houston, Texas. 

Michael Thomas Patrick Gannon, San Fran- 
cisco, California. 



Joe Hardin Ganl, Adamsville. Tennessee. 
William Thomas Gibson, Williamson, West 

Virginia. 

William Augustus Glllaspie, 111, Jupiter, 

Florida 

Evanne Tyndall Goode. Gretna. Louisiana. 

Margaret Montgomery Groome, Greenville. 

Mississippi 

Melanle Jo Hamilton, Fayetteville, Tennessee. 

Diane Kay Harder, Madison. Wisconsin. 

Harold Louis Harris, Metairie, Louisiana. 

Michelle Taylor Naught. Boise. Idaho 

Jane Schacht Haydon, Erie, Pennsylvania. 

Roberl James Hayward, Jr., Red Bank, New 

Jersey. 

Scott Harris Hershman, Brook, Indiana. 
Thomas John Higgins, Avondale. Louisiana. 
Susan Asdell Hogan. New Orleans. 
Ellzat>eth Patricia Hottell, Louisville, Kentucky. 
Kenneth Allan Jaye. Miami Beach, Florida. 
David Harris Johnson, Delphi, Indiana. 
Edna Wooten Johnson, Wetumpka. Alabama. 
Patricia Birch Jones, Montgomery. Alabama. 
Sarah Ann Joubert, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Harry Dudley Joynton, Jr., New Orleans. 
Karen Rae Kelley, Louisville, Kentucky. 
Joseph Dee Kimbrell, Jr., Morgan City, Loui- 
siana. 

William Michael King, New Orleans. 
Victoria Lee Kingdon, San Francisco, Califor- 
nia. 

William Frank Klock, New Orleans 
Donna Pruett Kranzusch, New Orleans. 
Gloria Dean Laster, Chattanooga, Tennessee. 
Constance Frances LaVine, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Beverly Bethune Lawson, New Orleans. 
Carol Jeanne Lindsey, Little Rock, Arkansas. 
Luther Clyde Lusk, Jr., New Orleans. 
Patricia Ann Mackey, Metairie. Louisiana. 
Ann Culligan Martin, Harahan, Louisiana. 

Nancy Margaret McGeorge, Pine Bluff, Ar- 
kansas. 

Ruth Horton McWaters, Baton Rouge. Loui- 
siana. 

John Andrew Merrick, Arlington. Massachu- 
setts. 

Carol KIngsley Miller, Madison, Wisconsin. 

Charles Joseph Monlezun, Gretna, Louisiana. 

Jane Clark Moorman, Altavista, Virginia. 

Carol Marie Murphy, Pensacola, Rorida. 

Betty Moye Myers, Metairie, Louisiana. 

Glenn Alford Noblin, Dallas. Texas. 

Frances Fawcett Oliver. Savannah. Georgia. 

Judith Rose Owen. Memphis. Tennessee. 

Sherrill Lawson Owens, Dallas, Pennsylvania. 

Holley Durant Pavy. New Orleans. 

Paul J. Peterson, Lehi, Utah. 

Richard Nelson Potter, New Orleans. 

Barbara Hurd Powell, Janesville, Wisconsin. 

Howard Alvln Powell, Wheeling. West Virginia. 

John Ray Powers, Jr., Baton Rouge. Louisiana. 

Gordon Alfred Raley, Carthage. Texas. 

Maureen Ellen Reardon, Youngston. Ohio. 

Carol Turnbull Redditt, New Orleans. 

Edward James Riley, New Orleans. 

Mary Cecilia Roberts, Lincoln. Nebraska. 

Adinah Brown Robertson, Murphy. North 

Carolina. 

Hazel Howell Royals, University, Mississippi. 

Dora Faye Sanders, Laurel. Mississippi. 

Elizabeth Perry Scott, Greenville. Mississippi. 

Beryl Gay Segre, New Orleans. 

Ronald Ignatius Shiloh, New Orleans. 

Jimmy Neal Silver, Enid. Oklahoma. 



/ PAGE 59 



Barry Morris Silverstein, Westmont, New Jer- 
sey. 

Helen Joanna Stavros, Birmingham, Alabama. 
William Freddie Stewart, Roseland, Louisiana. 
John Isadore Swang, Jr., New Orleans. 
Leonora Kerr Talley, Roanoke, Virginia. 
Richard Leighion Tappe, Visalia, California. 
Mary Glenn Thomas, Houston, Texas. 
Linda Faye Todd, Winnsboro, Louisiana. 
MIchele Maria Truxilio, New Orleans. 
Frances Priscilla Turner, Hattiesburg, Missis- 
sippi. 

John Stephen Waldo, New Orleans. 
Jane Louise Waller, Chicago, Illinois. 
James Moore Watts, Brookhaven, Mississippi. 
John David Wells, Athens, Georgia. 
Connie Lynn Wennet, Capron, Oklahoma. 
Thomas Earl Wiginton, Paden, Oklahoma. 
Barbara Pitts Will<inson, New Orleans. 
Ezar Marietta Williams, New Orleans. 

DOCTOR OF SOCIAL WORK 

Avrum Isaac Cohen, Glencoe, Illinois. 

GRADUATE SCHOOL 

MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING 

Carmen Margarita Aponte, Spanish, New Or- 
leans. 

Catherine Lovell Dyer, History, New Orleans. 

Douglas Joseph Haas, Mathematics, New Or- 
leans. 

Mary Manning Henshaw, Art, Lake Charles, 
Louisiana. 

Lawrence Joseph Pijeaux, Art, New Orleans. 
Bobby Lee Poarch, German, Valdese, North 
Carolina. 

Alice Amelia Sherman, English, Pensacola, 
Florida. 

Ronald Earl Swain, French, Spartanburg, 

South Carolina. 

Tina Tabachnick Weil, Art, Chicago, Illinois. 

MASTER OF EDUCATION 

Sarah Leonard Allen, New Orleans. 
Geraldine Wheeler Butler, New Orleans. 
Clara Thibodeaux Byes, New Orleans. 
Barbara Delia Celles Cropp, New Orleans. 
Wilbur Glenn Ferris, New Orleans 
Shirley John Francois, Eunice, Louisiana. 
Kathleen Gallagher, Brooklyn, New York 
Richard Jacl<son Gregory, Metairie, Louisiana. 
Mary Holsberry Hardy, Slidell, Louisiana 
Donald Edward Jenldns, New Orleans. 
Ida May Kolman, Metairie, Louisiana. 

The greatest total experience in graduate 
school has been the complete manifestation 
of man's humanity toward man, rather than 
his inhumanity, in contrasting the dilemmas 
of last spring's intellectual storm with the res- 
pect of this spring's purposeful serenity. 
Marian Gravelie Lhotal<, Mason City, Iowa. 
Mary Ann Miles, Lumberton, Mississippi. 
Roscoe Marit Needles, Atlantic, Iowa. 
Paula Wall Pickart, New Orleans. 
Paula Teles Picker, New Orleans. 
Dorothy Mary Rault, New Orleans. 
Sandra Lee Reynolds, La Place, Louisiana. 
Susan Kathryn Sale, Haynesville, Louisiana. 
Shirley Glynn Williams, New Orleans. 

MASTER OF FINE ARTS 

William Delan Bush, Art (Painting), Glasgow, 



Kentucky. 

Joann Flom Greenberg, Art (Ceramics), New 
Orleans. 

Geraldine Hubbell, Music (Piano), New Or- 
leans. 

Stephen Paul Lowery, Art (Painting), Muncie, 
Indiana. 

William Lee McClary, Art (Painting), Atlante, 
Georgia. 

Robert Everest Parks, Art (Print Making), Ok- 
lahoma City, Oklahoma. 
Mart Poldmets, Art (Ceramics), Manhattan, 
New York. 

Albert Hilliard Smith, Jr., Art (Painting), At- 
lanta, Georgia. 

Richmond Louis Stubbs, Art (Sculpture), New 
Orleans. 

John Lee Stuntz, Theatre, Garland, Texas. 
Harold Lee Swayder, Art (Ceramics), Browns- 
ville, Texas. 

Denise Chenel Vallon, Art (Painting), New 
Orleans. 

Mari-Richard Weber, Theatre, Louisville, Ken- 
tucky. 

Stephen Dale Wilson, Art (Print Making), New 
Orleans. 

Patricia Faith Woodward, Music (Voice), Mo- 
bile, Alabama. 

Bonnie Lynn Zakotnik, Music (Organ), Wash- 
ington, District of Columbia. 

MASTER OF ARTS 

David Leslie Arnett, English, Tucson, Arizona. 
Aurora Elvira Babb-Torres, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Gomez Palacio, Durango, Mexico. 
Richard John Batt, History, New Orleans. 

Karen Ann Becnel, Spanish and Portuguese, 
New Orleans. 

Janet Rebecca Bender, Latin American Stu- 
dies, Somerset, Pennsylvania. 
Susan Birenbaum, Art (History), Waterbury, 
Connecticut. 

William Patrick Bishop, English, Alexaq^dria, 
Louisiana. 

Lucille Gilberte Bollard, French and Italian, 
Swansea, Massachusetts. 
Shelley Ann Bowen, Latin American Studies, 
Winter Park, Florida. 

Gary Harold Brooks, Political Science, Mc- 
Comb, Mississippi. 

Harvey Rowland Brooks, Theatre, Sheridan, 
Arkansas. 

Peter William Bruton, History, San Antonio, 
Texas. 

John Philip Clark, III, Philosophy, New Or- 
leans. 

Jeanne Schaub Classe,' French and Italian, 
Scarsdale. New York. 

Sarajane Jack Di Laura, Latin American Stu- 
dies, Port Deposit, Maryland. 
Jo Beth Barnes Eubanks, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, New Orleans. 
Geneva Cherylene Evans, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Alexander City, Alabama. 
John DeKlyn Evans, Latin American Studies, 
Bellevue, Washington. 

Margaret Ellen Gates, Political Science, Mo- 
bile, Alabama. 

Maria Crisb'na Quinones Guilott, Spanish and 
Portuguese, Barranquilla, Columbia. 
Mary Farrar Hatchette, Music, New Orleans. 
Arlene Suzanne Hechter, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Miami Beach, Florida. 
Charles Matthew Hogan, Classical Languages, 
Long Beach, California. 
John Lindsey Holleman, Philosophy, Mobile, 
Alabama. 

Linda Tarte Holley, English, Darlington, South 
Carolina. 



Neil Steiner Hyman, Art (History), New Or- 
leans. 

Luis Iglesias, Spanish and Portuguese, Sala- 
manca, Spain. 

Diane Phillips Jennings, Political Science, 
Bishop, California. 

Lanny Vincent Johnson, Latin American Stu- 
dies, Quincy, Illinois. 

Sheila Hope Jurnak, English, New York, New 
York. 

Frank Sheridan Kennett, History, Asheville, 
North Carolina. 

Eileen Elizabeth Kirk, Latin American Studies, 
Bridgeport, Connecticut. 
Joann Victoria Kling, French and Italian, Cu- 
pertino, California. 

Katharine Chapman Krebs, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Denver, Colorado. 
Elizabeth Werner Lawrence, Art (History), New 
Orleans. 

Gary Russell Libby, English, Fort Meyers, 
Florida. 

Earl Franklin Luetzelschwab, English, High- 
land, Indiana. 

Bonnie Kaplan Lyons, English, New Orleans. 
Ann Alford Martin, German, Vicksburg, Mis- 
sissippi. 

Cheryl English Martin, History, Buffalo, New 
York. 

Mary Helen Matlick, Philosophy, Louisville, 
Kentucky. 

Robert Samuel McGinnis, Jr., Philosophy, 
Owensboro, Kentucky. 

Adna Rosa Rodriguez Menendez, Spanish and 
Portuguese, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 
Antonio Ramon Montane,' Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, New Orleans. 
Elizabeth Franz Mount, French and Italian, 
Scarsdale, New York. 

Edward John Murphy, Philosophy, Chicago, 
Illinois. 

George Theodore Pantos, English, Livingston, 
New Jersey. 

Patricia Ann Pesoli, English, Ithaca, New York. 
Frank Timothy Petruszak, Political Science, 
Homewood. Illinois. 

Rebecca Sue Porterfield, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Montgomery, Alabama. 
Joseph Earl Riehl, English, New Orleans. 
Michele Helyne Risko, Spanish and Portu- 
guese, Pickens, South Carolina. 
Maria Clementina Ruiz, Spanish and Portu- 
guese, Aguas Calientes, Mexico. 
Allen Kreger Smith, Philosophy, Brooklyn, 
New York, 

Cynthia Elisa Smith, Latin American Studies, 
New Orleans. 

Linda Louise Sommerfield, German, Cleve- 
land, Ohio. 

John Hunter Spence, English, Camilla, Geor- 
gia. 

Mary Christina Stretch, Latin American Stu- 
dies, St. Louis, Missouri. 
Margarita Ortiz Swetman, Spanish and Por- 
tuguese, Thibodaux, Louisiana. 
Hilda Debora ten Brink, Latin American Stu- 
dies, New Orleans. 

Jorge Luis Valderrama, History, Medellin, Co- 
lumbia. 

Charles David Ward, Philosophy, Aurora, Illi- 
nois. 

Benjamin Van Leonard Weathersby, English, 
McComb, Mississippi. 

Charles Harrell Weathersby, Jr., English, 
Amite, Louisiana. 

MASTER OF SCIENCE 

James Johannes Bishara, Chemical Engi- 
neering, Dedham, Massachusetts. 



PAGE 60 / 



Clifford Joseph Boasso, Physics, New Or- 
leans. 
Ronald Wilfred Busuttll, Pharmacology, 

Tampa, Florida 

John Howard Caruso, Biology. Rutherford, 
New Jersey. 

tUlaneck Godrej Chlchgar, Geology. Bombay. 
India 

Barbar Jean Conner, Speech Pathology. Ne- 

macolin, Pennsylvania. 

Harold Jon Cramer, Chemical Engineering, 
New Orleans. 

Austin Theodore Fitzjarrell, Biology, Overland 
Park, Kansas 

Sarah Ann Burnett Frates, Psychology, Dyers- 
burg, Tennessee 

Jan iVIarshall Friedman, Biochemistry. Alton. 

Illinois. 

i\1ichael Edward Glowacz, Geology, Chicago, 
Illinois 

Deepal( (Vlanohar Guple, Physics, Bombay. 
India. 

David IVIichaei Hegedus, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. New Orleans. 

Alche Sabbagh Jasser, Pharmacology. Da- 
mascus. Syria. 

Pral<ash Narsing Karkal, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. Bombay. India. 
William Frederick LaMarfin, Mathematics, 
Okeechobee. Florida. 

Allan Harold Lambert, Chemical Engineering, 
New Orleans. V 

Jannan George Lee, Mechanical Engineering, 
Taipei, Taiwan. 

Joyce Ellen Krohn Levingston, Biology. Co- 
lumbus. Georgia. 

Joel Howard Lewis, Psychology. Houston, 
Texas. 

Marcllle Mahan, Anatomy. Lola. Kentucky, 

Frank Hastings McKim, Pharmacology. West 
River. Maryland. 

William Alan Montevecchi, Psychology. Bev- 
erly. Massachusetts. 

Juan Bautista Pericchi, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. Caracas. Venezuela. 
Uwe Rainer Pontius, Mechanical Engineering. 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 
Joann Ratton, Geology. Memphis. Tennessee. 
Edward Patrick Riley, Psychology. Roselle 
Park, New Jersey, 

James Millard Sothern, Geology. Houma. 
louisiana. 

Louis Oscar Smith, Jr., Mechanical Engi- 
neering. Metairie. Louisiana. 
Newell Allan Smith, Jr., Mechanical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans, 

Shirley Nichols Sparks, Speech Pathology, 
New Orleans 

George Alexander Swan, III, Chemical Engi- 
neering, Biloxi, Mississippi. 
Martin Franz Vogt, Chemical Engineering. New 
Orleans, 

Martin Stuart Waite, Psychology. Springfield. 
Massachusetts. 

Paul Tennyson Williams, Chemical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 

Wilburn Holt Akers, Paleontology, New Or- 
leans. 

Paul James Anastasiou, Psychology. Bran- 
ford. Connecticut 

Peter Michael Andrews, Biology. Wheaton. 
Maryland. 

James Franklin Baker, History. Houston. 
Texas. 

Frank Vernon Barchard. Jr., History. Foley. 
Alabama 

Roger Daniel Bleier, Mathematics. Browns- 
ville. Texas. 



Margaret Nell Bond, Anthropology. Quitman, 
Mississippi 

Ernesto Marcelino Bonllla-Romero, Biochem- 
istry, Maracaibo, Venezuela 
Gearold Peter Breidenbach, Microbiology. 
Kenton, Ohio 

Charles Lillie Campbell, Geology, New Or- 
leans 

Stephen Webb Carmichael, Anatomy, Mo- 
desto, California 

Frederick Lamar Chapman, Theatre, Toledo, 
Ohio 

Sheila O'Donnell Collins, Mathematics, New 
Orleans. 

John Randolph Conover, English. Huntsville, 
Alabama. 

Malcolm Anthony Cunningham, Spanish and 
Portuguese. Newton Highlands. Massachu- 
setts. 

William Schuyler deCamp, Political Science. 
New Orleans- 

James Michael DeGeorge, English. Houston, 
Texas. 

David Lawrence DeSha, Anatomy. San An- 
tonio. Texas. 

Elizabeth Mary Earley, Biology. Bala-Cynwyd. 
Pennsylvania. 

Kenneth Raymond Farr, Political Science. 
Jackson. Michigan. 

Jackson Franklin Ferguson, German. Blacks- 
burg. Virginia. 

Sharon Kaye File, Parasitology. Dowagiac. 
Michigan. 

Ferris Raymond Fox, II, Biology. New Orleans. 
Michele Bailliet Frangois, Economics. Thibo- 
daus. Louisiana. 

David John Garland, Mechanical Engineering. 
New Orleans. 

Charles Henry Goodman, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. Fort Worth, Texas. 
Barry Jude Haindel, Physics. New Orleans. 
Ralph Malcolm Hayward, III, English. Basking 
Ridge. New Jersey. 

Marcia Alice Herndon, Anthropology. Canton, 
North Carolina. 

Wayne Clanton Hobbs, Music, Metairie, Loui- 
siana. 

Randolph Michael Howes, Biochemistry. Pon- 
chatoula. Louisiana 

Adam Joseph Hulin, Mathematics, Kenner. 
Louisiana. 

Forrest Jack Hurley, History. Fort Worth. 
Texas. 

Philip Brian Johnson, History. Lee. Illinois. 
Benna Kay Kime, English. Tulsa. Oklahoma. 
Ben Harold Knott, Social Work, Cincinnati. 
Ohio. 

Mervin Kontrovitz, Geology. Trenton, New 
Jersey. 

Donn Maulsby Kurtz, II, Political Science. 
Lafayette. Louisiana. 

Anita Saffels Lawson, English. Tallahassee, 
Florida. 
Carolina Donadio Lawson, French and Italian, 



Park Forest. Illinois 

John Young Lebourgeois, History. New Or- 
leans 

Salvador Eugene Longo, Physics, New Or- 
leans 

Helene Shulman Schell Lorenz, Philosophy, 
Mill Valley, California. 

Jude Thomas May, History. Oklahoma City. 
Oklahoma 

Michael Kenneth May, Biology. Mandeville. 
Louisiana. 

Lewis Jerome Mayard, Chemical Engineering, 
Ashland. Kentucky 

Cruse Douglas Melvin, Physics. Woodville. 
Texas. 

Edward Adam Moffatt, Mechanical Engi- 
neering. Oakland. California. 
Julius Peter Neumeyer, III, Chemical Engi- 
neering, New Orleans. 

Martin Ottenheimer, Anthropology, Manhattan, 

Kansas. 

Morris Hayward Pardue, Economics, New Or- 
leans. 

Dabney Glenn Park. Jr., History. Houston, 
Texas. 

Joseph Balfour Parker, Political Science, 
Crowville, Louisiana. 

Fred Paul Partus, Mechanical Engineering, 
Belleville. New Jersey, 

Dwight Edward Phillips. Anatomy. Hilger, 
Montana. 

Benjamin Edward Pierce, Anthropology, 
Hammond. Louisiana. 

Monte Eddy Piliawsky, Political Science. New 
Orleans. 

Quentin Albert Pletsch, Biochemistry, 
Marietta. Georgia. 

Claude Wylie Poag. Paleontology. Bryan, 
Texas. 

Stuart Elden Rich, Chemical Engineering, 
Miami. Florida. 

Alwyn Rudolph Rouyer, Political Science, New 
Orleans. 

Mercedes Esmeralda Soberano, Biochemistry, 
Bacolod City. Philippines 
Gerald Douglass Stormer. Philosophy. River- 
side. Illinois. 

Robert Gentry Summers. Jr., Anatomy. Son- 
era. California. 

Alonso Takahashi, Mathematics. Call. Colum- 
bia. 

Chester Neal Tate, Political Science. Gas- 
tonia. North Carolina. 

Timothy Junius Triche, Anatomy. Derwood. 
Maryland 

Alexander Von Schoenborn. Philosophy. Pra- 
kue. Czechoslovakia 

David Michael Warner. Business Administra- 
tion, Rocky Mount, North Carolina. 
Charles Wittman Weston. Chemistry. Pass 
Christian, Mississippi. 

Elsa Louise Winsor, Parasitology, St. Peters- 
burg. Florida 

Roman Bohdan Worobec, Microbiology. New 

Orleans 








■fi^py' 



paf?^noia 
ofatention 

man 

emptv 19 




©nancy duell 




it 



A Dead Nude 
Isn't So Bad 



59 



This year, when they uncrated the 1 971 Gumbo there was something different 
about its 520 pages— from its surrealistic cover of red, white and blue through 
its pages of flashy colors and irreverent text— nude pictures had been used 
for the first time. 

Appearance of the book set students abuzz and prompted Baton Rouge 
State Rep. Irving "Bo" Boudreaux to blast the book as containing "the 
nastiest pictures he'd ever seen." 

He won House approval of a bill expressing legislative disapproval of the 
annual's editorial policy, reducing state funding of the publication, and calling 
for appointment of an advisory council to oversee publication of the book, 
a step already taken by LSU . . . 

"I just think those kids need better supervision to produce a better book 
next year," said Boudreaux. 

—Charles Zewe 

The States-Item 

May 28, 1971 



PAGE 64 



A resolution by Sen. Ted Hickey of 
New Orleans banning nudes in Loui- 
siana colleges and universities was 
refused a vote and sent to committee 
by a 23-5 vote of the Senate last 
week and died there when the Sen- 
ate adjourned Tuesday. 

The resolution would have 
directed the LSU Board of Super- 
visors and the State Board of Edu- 
cation "to take all necessary mea- 
sures within their authority ... to 
prohibit any and all persons from 
appearing nude in any classroom, 
studio, theater, auditorium or public j 
place on the campus of a university j 
or college under the administration 
of said boards, and to take all lawful 
measures to enforce such prohibi- 
tion." 

Objecting to a "revelation of com- j 
plete nudity of the human body at i 
a state-supported university," Hickey ; 
said allowing nudes in educational ■ 
classes is "immoral if nothing else." 

"The police in New Orleans are 
raiding Bourbon Street places 
nightly for the same purposes. An 
educational system does no good 
that requires nudes in the classes," 





Hickey said. 

Lt. Gov. C. C. Aycock, President 
of the Senate, asked Hickey if the 
resolution applied to medical 
schools. Hickey replied, "A dead 
nude isn't so bad. It's a live one that 
causes temptations." 

Sen J. D. DeBlieux of Baton 
Rouge led the fight to send the reso- 
lution to committee and told Hickey, 
"If they appeared in the classes for 
the same reason they do on Bourbon 
Street, I v^/ould agree with you. No 
one believes in morality more than 
I do." 

Sen. Jules Mollere of Metairie 
asked Hickey, "What about Miche- 
langelo?" and reminded him of the 
murals showing nudes which are 
displayed on the walls of the foyer 
of the Capitol. Hickey replied they 
were made of "stone and granite." 



—Freda Yarbrough 

The Summer Reveille. 
June 10, 1971 





PAGE 66 



• .> 



^ '^-4:. 



/L'-% 



©m'SQ -^Qq© 'was (S) 






IPstBflaoQ© IJoiIlaQQ© o 



'*; 




JAMBALAYA 1971 



MATT ANDERSON 



PRINCIPAL ACCOMPLICES 



DIANE BURNSIDE. WYLIE DAWSON. AND PATRICIA 
HOPKINS. 



HELPING HANDS 

FRANCISCO ALECHA, MARCIA BENNETT. JON BLEHAR. 
ANNE BOUDREAUX, LEE PICKETT, CAROL STONE. AND 
RICK STREIFFER. 



PHOTOGRAPHY 

MATT ANDERSON/ cover, 4-5, 6, 7, 10-13, 14-17, 18, 
20-21, (bottom), 22-23, 24 (top & bottom), 25, 26, 
27 (bottom), 28 (right), 29, 30, 34, 35, 40-43, 44- 
45, 46, 51, 55, 57, 60-61. farrell hockemeire/ 
8-9, 31, 37, 39, aaron navah/ 32. mike smith/ 3, 
8-9 (inserts), 20-21 (top), 24 (middle), 28 (left), 
62-63. 64. 




k 




> ,' ■'.■"^'^''- -■" -ii'k^''""' ' lift I ' vv. ' ' 
: ' U'*'''^.iW' j^-v'-'' !' ''■''" ;"■'■■■.. 



; ':;ii ;":!iM.;. 






1-' J, 



#:::f 



y^^ 









wmmm 



! ','rf 









-/ 



^ 



.- ...X 



'.'i.i'''-